be directed to answer and if he refused That the matter of the Charge be taken pro confesso And the King not owning their Authority was remanded Fol. 58. Westminster-Hall Tuesday the 23d Afternoon The King not owning their Authority was remanded and the Court Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there Resolved They would examine Witnesses Fol. 61. Painted-Chamber Wednesday the 24th was spent in examining their Witnesses Fol. 66. Painted-Chamber Thursday the 25th Afternoon They examined more Witnesses They Resolved to proceed to Sentence of Condemnation against the King And that this Condemnation be for being Tyrant Traytor and Murtherer and Publick Enemy to the Commonwealth And that the Condemnation extend to Death Fol. 68. And Ordered That a Sentence grounded upon these Votes be prepared by Scot Marten Harrison and others Painted-Chamber Friday the 26 th The draught of the Sentence Reported and agreed And Resolved That the King be brought the next day to Westminster-Hall to receive it Fol 96. Painted-Chamber Saturday the 27 th Fore-noon The Sentence being engrossed Resolved The same should be the Sentence which should be read and published in Westminster-Hall the same day That the President should not permit the King to speak after Sentence That after the Sentence read he should declare it to be the Sence and Judgment of the Court. That the Commissioners should thereupon signifie their Consent by standing up And the same day the Commons Ordered the Clerk to bring in the Records of that Judgment to the House Journal of the House Westminster-Hall the same Day After-noon The King being brought in and not owning their Authority the Sentence was read And upon the Declaration of the President That it was the Judgment of the Court they stood up and Owned it and Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there appointed Waller and others to consider of the Time and Place for Execution Painted-Chamber Monday the 29 th Upon the report of the Committee Ordered A Warrant be drawn for executing the King in the open Street before White-Hall the next day directed to Hacker and others which was done accordingly Fol. 116. 31. January 1648. Ordered by the Commons That the Lord Grey out of Haberdashers-Hall to difpose of 100 l. for the Service of the Common-wealth 2. February 1648. They Ordered in the first place to take into Consideration and Debate the House of Lords for settlement of the Government 6. February 1648. The House being seventy three And the Question put Whether that House should take the Advice of the House of Lords in the exercise of the Legislative Power The House was divided and it carried in the Negative by fifteen Voices And then Resolved That the House of Peers was useless and dangerous and ought to be abolished And Ordered an Act to be brought in for that purpose 7. February 1648. The Declared That the Office of a King in this Nation and to have Power thereof in a Single Person was unnecessary burthensom and dangerous to the Liberty Safety and publick interest of the People and therefore ought to be abolished 9. February 1648. They Ordered The Narrative of the Proceeding and Records for Tryal of the King to be forthwith brought into this House 16. February 1648. They Ordered That the Clerk of that High Court of Justice be desired to bring in those Proceedings to their House the next Day March 1648. Sir Arthur Hasilrig Reports from the Committee that Charls and James Stewart Sons of the late King should dye without Mercy wheresoever they should be found 12. December 1650. Mr. Say Reported the Proceedings of their High-Court against the King contained in a Book entituled A Journal c. which was read at large by their Clerk He likewise presented from that Court the Act for Tryal of the King and the Precept for holding the Court. The Charge was exhibited the twentieth And The Sentence Read the twenty seventh of January 1648. And thereupon they Declared That the Persons entrusted in that great Service had discharged their Trust with great Courage and Fidelity That the Parliament was well satisfied in that Accompt of the Particulars and Proceedings And Ordered That the same Records do remain among the Records of Parliament That those Proceedings be Engrossed in a Roll and Recorded among the Parliament-Rolls for transmitting the Memory thereof to Posterity And Resolved That their Commissioners for their Great Seal issue a Certiorari to their Clerk to transmit those Proceedings into the Chancery there to be on Record And that the same be sent by Mittimus from thence to other Courts at Westminster and Custos Rotulorum of the Counties to be Recorded In the County Middlesex The Proceedings at Hicks Hall Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. in order to the Tryal of the pretended Judges of his late Sacred Majesty THe Court being sate the Commission of Oyer and Terminer under the Great Seal of England was first read It was directed to the Lords and others hereafter named viz. Thomas Aleyn Knight and Baronet Lord Mayor of the City of London The Lord Chancellor of England The Earl of South-hampton Lord Treasurer of England The Duke of Somerset The Duke of Albemarle The Marquess of Ormond Steward of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Lindsey Great Chamberlain of England The Earl of Manchester Chamberlain of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Dorset The Earl of Berkshire The Earl of Sandwich Viscount Say and Seal The Lord Roberts The Lord Finch Denzil Hollis Esquire Sir Frederick Cornwallis Knight and Baronet Treasurer of His Majesties Houshold Sir Charles Barkly Knight Comptrouler of His Majesties Houshold Mr. Secretary Nicholas Mr. Secretary Morris Sir Anthony Ashley-Cooper Arthur Annesley Esquire The Lord Chief Baron Mr. Justice Foster Mr. Justice Mallet Mr. Justice Hide Mr. Baron Atkins Mr. Justice Twisden Mr. Justice Tyrrel Mr. Baron Turner Sir Harbottle Grimston Knight and Baronet Sir William Wild Knight and Baronet Recorder of London Mr. Serjeant Brown Mr. Serjeant Hale John Howel Esquire Sir Geoffry Palmer His Majestie 's Attorny General Sir Heneage Finch His Majestie 's Solicitor General Sir Edward Turner Attorney to His Highness the Duke of York Wadham Windham Esquire Edward Shelton Esquire Clerk of the Crown The Grand Jury Sworn were Sir William Darcy Baronet Foreman Sir Robert Bolles Baronet Sir Edward Ford Knight Sir Thomas Prestwick Sir William Coney Knight Sir Charles Sidley Baronet Sir Lewis Kirk Knight Sir Henry Littleton Baronet Sir Ralph Bovey Baronet Edward Chard Esquire Robert Giggon Esquire John Fotherly Esquire Charles Gibbons Esquire Thomas Geree Esquire Richard Cox Esquire Robert Bladwell Esquire Henry Mustian Esquire John Markham Esquire Edward Buckley Gent. Francis Bourchier Gent. Edward Lole Hart Cryer After Proclamation for silence was made it pleased Sir Orlando-Bridgman Lord Chief Baron of His Majestie 's High Court of Exchequer to speak to the Jury as followeth The Lord Chief Baron's Speech Gentlemen YOu are the Grand Inquest for the Body of this County of Middlesex You may
themselves an Authority to make Laws which was never heard before Authority to make Laws What Laws a Law for an High Court of Justice a Law for lives to sentence mens lives And whose Life the Life of their Sovereign upon such a King who as to them had not only redressed long before at the beginning of the Parliament all Grievances that were and were imaginable taken away the Star-Chnmber High-Commission-Court and about Shipping such a King and after such Concessions that He had made in the Isle of Wight when He had granted so much that was more than the People would have desired When these few Commons not onely without but excluding the rest of the Commons not onely without but excluding the rest but rejecting the Lords too that then sat when these few Commons shall take upon them this Authority and by colour of this their King Soveraign Liege Lord shall be sentenced put to Death and that put to Death even as their King and sentenced as their King put to Death as their King and this before His own Door even before that Place where He used in Royal Majesty to hear Embassadors to have His Honourable Entertainments that this King shall be thus put to Death at Noon-day it is such an Aggravation of Villany that truly I cannot tell what to say No story that ever was I do not think any Romance any Fabulous Tragedy can produce the like Gentlemen If any Person shall now come and shroud himself under this pretended Authority or such a pretended Authority you must know that this is so far from an Excuse that it is an Height of Aggravation The Court of Common-Pleas is the Common Shop for Justice in that Court an appeal is brought for Murther which ought to have been in the King's Bench the Court gives Judgment the Party is condemned and executed in this Case it is Murther in them that executed because they had no lawful Authority I speak this to you to shew you that no man can shroud himself by colour of any such false or pretended Authority I have but one thing more to add to you upon this head and that is which I should have said at first If two or more do compass or Imagine the King's Death if some of them go on so far as to Consullation if others of them go further they sentence and execute put to Death in this Case they are all Guilty the first Consultation was Treason I have no more to add but one Particular a few Words As you will have Bills presented against those for Compassing Imagining Adjudging the King so possibly you may have Bils presented against some of those for Levying War against the King Levying of War which is another Branch of the State of 25th of Edward the Third It was but Declarative of the Common Law it was no new Law By that Law it was treason to Levy War against the King But to levy War against the Kings Authority you must know is Treason too If men will take up Armes upon any Publick pretence if it be to expulse Aliens if but to pull out Privy Councellours if it be but against any Particular Laws to reform Religion to pull down Enclosures in all these cases If Persons have assembled themselves in a Warlike manner to do any of these Acts this is Treason and within that Branch of Levying War against the King This was adjudged in the late Kings Time in Berstead's case Queen Elizabeth's Henry the Eighth's former Times King Jame's Time much more 〈◊〉 men will go not onely to Levy War against the King but against the Laws all the Laws subvert all the Laws to set up new Laws Models of their own If any of these cases come to be presented to you you know what the Laws are To conclude you are now to enquire of Blood of Royal Blood of Sacred Blood Blood like that of the Saints under the Altar crying Quousque Domine How long Lord c. This Blood crys for Vengeance and it will not be appeased without a Bloody Sacrifice Remember but this and I have done I shall not press you upon your Oaths you are Persons of Honour you all know the Obligation of an Oath This I will say that he that conceals or favours the guilt of Blood takes it upon himself wilfully knowingly takes it upon himself And we know that when the Jews said Let his blood be on us and our seed it continued to them and their Posterity to this day God save the King Amen Amen His Lordships Speech being ended Thomas Lee of the Middle-Temple London Gentleman was called to give in the Names of his Witnesses The names of the Witnesses then and there sworn follow William Clark Esq James Nutley Esq Mr. George Masterson Clerk George Farringdon Hercules Huncks Dr. William King Martin Foster John Baker Stephen Kirk Richard Nunnelly John Powel John Throckmorton John Blackwel Ralph Hardwick Thomas Walkley Gentleman Holland Simpson Benjamin Francis Colonel Matthew Thomlinson Griffith Bodurdo Esq Samuel Boardman Robert Carr Esq Richard Young Sir Purbock Temple John Rushworth Esq John Gerrard John Hearn Mr. Coitmore Mr. Cunningham Mr. Clench Willinm Jessop Esq Edward Austin Darnel Esq Mr. Brown Thomas Tongue John Bowler Mr. Sharp Mr. Lee. Robert Ewer John King Edward Folley Mr. Gouge Anthony Mildmay Esq The Grand Jury returned the Indictment Billa Vera. Court adjourned to the Old-Bailey 10th of October The 10. of October 1660. SIR John Robinson Knight Lieutenant of his Majesties Tower of London according to his Warrant received delivered to Mr. Sheriff the Prisoners hereafter named who were in several Coaches with a strong Guard of Horse and Foot conveyed to Newgate and about nine of the Clock in the Morning delivered to the Keepers of that Prison and thence brought to the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily London where the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer were in Court assembled and where their Indictment was publickly read by Edward Shelton Esq Clerk of the Crown Sessions-House in the Old-Baily 10. October 1660. THE Court being Assembled and Silence commanded the Commission of Oyer and Terminer was again read After which Sir Hardress Waller Collonel Thomas Harrison and Mr. William Heveningham were brought to the Bar and commanded to hold up their Hands which Sir Hardress Waller and Mr. Heveningham did but Harrison being commanded to hold up his Hand answered I am here and said My Lord if you please I will speak a Word Court Hold up your hand and you shall be heard in duetime Mr. Harrison the course is That you must hold up your hand first And then he held up his hand The Indictment was read purporting That He together with others not having the fear of God before his Eyes and being instigated by the Devil did Maliciously Treasonably and Feloniously contrary to his due Allegiance and bounden Duty sit upon and condemn our late Soveraign Lord King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory and also did upon
might be taken pro confesso Court By whom Nutly By the Prisoner at the Bar if so be that he would not answer This my Lord is the substance of what I have to say against him Council Mr. Nutly pray what discourse have you had at any time with the Prisoner at the Bar concerning this impeachment Nutly Truly my Lord I knew the Gentleman well I was well acquainted with him and for the satisfaction of my own conscience for I was very tender in the business and sorry he was ingaged in it I went to him and did desire him to desist I had discourse with him for I was then a young Student in the Temple and had a little knowledge in the Laws I desired him to consider the dangerous consequences of such a proceeding I may say I did it with tears in my eyes for I had a very good respect to the Gentleman for his profession sake being learned therein truly my Lord he did answer me thus I acknowlegde it is a very base business but they put it upon me I cannot avoid it you see they put it upon me I had some discourse with him concerning the oath of Allegiance truly he was satisfied that this oath was against the business in question I saw he was troubled at it Council Can ye speak of the manner of calling for Judgement against the King Nutly That I have already answered to it was several times done the King was brought several times to the Bar and at every time he was brought he was pressed to answer whether Guilty or Not guilty Court By whom Nutly By the Sollicitor then the Prisoner now at the Bar. My Lord I remember his Majesty was pleased when he saw he could not be heard to the discourse that he did intend to make of the whole business saith the King if you will needs press me to an answer I must demur to your Jurisdiction my Lord the answer that was given to that was this Mr. Bradshaw there then President did say Sir saith he if you demur to the Jurisdiction of this Court I must let you know that the Court doth over-rule your demurrer this was said my Lord and Judgement was pressed very often Court By whom Nutly By the prisoner at the Bar. Cook My Lord may I ask him a question Court Yes Cook The first question is whether the Parchment was delivered by me unto the Court or brought into the Court by Mr. Broughton the Clerk Mr. Nutly I do encline to believe my Lord That it was brought into the Court and delivered by some hand or other to the Prisoner at the Bar I do beleive it was for I do remember it was written by one Price I was told that was his name that may be true I believe it was brought into the Court and delivered to the Prisoner now at the Bar. Council But did he exhibit it Nutly Yes my Lords Cook Did you see me set my hand to that Parchment N. No my Lords but I believe it to be his hand Cook Another Question whether Mr. Nutly did hear me say concerning the opinions of those Gentlemen what they intended to do in that business Nut. My Lords I do remember that I had often conference with the Gentleman at the Bar. I desired him to desist from the business considering the dangerous consequences of it truly my Lord I do well remember that he did say he did hope they did not intend to take away the Kings life said I if they go about any such thing do you use your utmost endeavour to preserve his life saith he I did labour to that purpose but they tell me they only intend to bring him to submit to the Parliament Cook It is said that I demanded Judgement of his life Mr. Nutly I demand of you whether I used the words of Judgement against his life but only I demanded their Judgement Nut. My Lords for that I cannot remember possibly to a syllable but Judgement was demanded Court By whom N. By this person Cook I said the judgment of the Court not against him I meant judgement for his acquital Court Did you ever hear him desire the Court that the Charge might be taken pro confesso N. That I have said my Lord it was urged by the Prisoner at the Bar against his Majesty That if he would not plead to the Charge that then the matter charged in it might be taken pro confesso But my Lord if you please to give me leave to add this one word more my Lord I did hear him say at that time he shewed me a paper that contained an order of the Court that did direct the very words that he should use when he came to deliver the Charge whether those words were in the order I do not know Cook Whether was I not directed by those Gentlemen the very words I should speak Court We are satisfied in that he saith by an order that you shewed him you were so directed If you have any thing more ask it him Mr. Farrington sworn Mr. Sol. Gen. Pray tell my Lords and the Jury what was the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at Westminster at the place they called the High Court of Justice Farringt My Lord I was present about the 20th of Jan. 1648. at that which they called the High Court of Justice and Mr. Bradshaw sat then as President so much as I remember concerning the Prisoner at the Bar I shall acquaint your Lorship This Gentleman at the Bar after the reading of the Commission and directions by the President to bring his Majesty the prisoner they called him to the Bar the King being brought after silence made and some speeches made by the President this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar having then a Parchment in his hand the substance of it was for levying War against the Kingdom he prayed that it might be read and accepted as a Charge in behalf of the good people of England It was accordingly read and afterwards being demanded to answer after his Majesty having given several reasons as to the Jurisdiction of the Court four days every day the Prisoner at the Bar demanded the judgement of the Court. And if his Majesty would not answer to the charge it might be taken pro confesso Coun. Do you know his hand if you see it Farring I have not seen his hand a long time Then the Impeachment was shewn to the witness Far. Truly Sir this is like his hand Coun. Do you believe it Far. It is very like it I do not know positively Coun. Did you hear the words pro confesso Far. Yes my Lord several times after the first day Coun. Did he interrupt the King in his discourse as to say these words that the Charge might be taken pro confesso Far. I do remember one day there was some interruption between the King and him the King laying his Cane upon his shoulder desiring him to forbear Cock You cannot say that
that blessed be God the house is purged and the Lords will be shortly pull'd out and the twenty eighth day of January which was the day after the King was sentenced at Saint James's his Chappel you took for your Text the 149. Psalm the 6 7 8 and 9 verses whereof these words were part To bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron there in the middle of that Sermon having spoken before of the King you said you did intend to preach before the poor wretch upon the 14 of Isaiah the 18 19 and 20 verses speaking of all the Kings of the nations Thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch c. he saith further you said look upon your lesser Bibles and you will find the title is The Tyrants fall There is another witness that is one Bowdler a few days before the Kings death at S. Sepulchres there you fell upon the old comparison all along you compared the King to Barabbas and that a great many would have Christ crucified and Barabbas released all along comparing the King to Barabbas One more and that was Ryder he heard this text He shall call his name Emanuel you fell to speak of news what shall become of the King and you said the King was Barabbas and a great many would rather have Christ crucified than Barabbas And then Mr. Walker he saith that after the King was first brought to his tryal he heard you say this I have prayed and preached this twenty years and now may I say with old Simeon Lord now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace for mine eyes have seen thy salvation he mentions that you made use of the other comparison of the Major and the Bishops man and inferred from thence that the King and Prince c. were not excepted out of the Scripture where it is said Whosoever sheds mans blood c. you have heard all this witnessed against you what have you to say for your self Peters These are but single witnesses Lord Chief Baron The statute is two witnesses for Treason but not two to one individual thing though there are several witnesses have proved the same thing about Barabbas and our Saviour Bind their Kings with chains c. and of your other actions there is a whole Jury of witnesses two witnesses expresly we agreed upon the Kings death and we resolved to set the King aside Pet. I do not know the witnesses Lord Chief Baron One is Sir Jeremy Whitchcot the other is Doctor Young you shall do well if you have any thing to say to invalid these witnesses to speak to it else the Jury will be sent together to deliver up their verdict Peters My Lord if I had time and opportunity I could take off many of the witnesses but because their testimony is without control I cannot satisfie my self I have no skill in the Law else I might have spoke for my self I do not know what to say more unless I had more time and counsel Mr. Soll. Gen. If the prisoner can say no more here is this in it here are five places where he did consult about the Kings death at Windsor at Ware in Colemanstreet in the Painted Chamber and in Bradshaws house and four witnesses to prove this there are two witnesses to his comparison of the K. and Barabbas and two witnesses to his text of binding their K. inchains c. proof that he hath been in action in New-Eng that he came from it with that intent and then went to Holland that he had been in arms that he called the day of his Majesties tryal a glorious day resembling the judging of the world by Saints he prays for this in the Painted Chamber preaches for it at Whitehall S. James's Chapel Sepulchres what man could more contrive the death of the King than this miserable Priest hath done the honour of the Pulpit is to be vindicated and the death of this man will preach better than his life did it may be a means to convert many a miserable person whom the preaching of this person hath seduced for many come here and say they did it in the fear of the Lord and now you see who taught them and I hope you will make an example of this carnal prophet The Jury went together and after a little consultation settled in their places Cl. Are you agreed in your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our foreman Cl. How say you is the prisoner at the Bar guilty of the Treason whereof he stands indicted or not guilty Foreman Guilty Cl. And so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Look to him Keeper Coun. We desire Mr. Cook may be brought to the Bar and that they may both have their judgement pronounced Cl. John Cook hold up thy hand what hast thou to say why the Court should not pronounce judgement for thee to dye according to Law Cook I have a few words matter of Law First there is no averment in the Indictment that J. Cook mentioned in the Act of Indempnity is the same with the John Cook mentioned in the Indictment and that I am the John Cook mentioned in both L. Ch. Bar. This will not help you in this case you have owned and have pleaded by the name of John Cook Cook The second is this that the overt acts should be particularly expressed in the Indictment L. Ch. Bar. This cannot be alledged in arrest of judgement the Jury have found you guilty of compassing and imagining the death of the King by the statute of 25 Edw. 3. and this cannot help you Cook I say it was professionately L. Ch. B. That hath been overruled already we have delivered our opinions the profession of a Lawyer will not excuse them or any of them from Treason and this hath been overruled and is overruled again Cook I humbly conceive that the remaining part of the House of Commons were to be Judges whether there was a force or not L. Ch. B. This is all past and overruled Cook Then I have no more Cl. Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand what hast thou to say for thy self why Judgement should not pass against thee to die according to law Peters I will submit my self to God and if I have spoken any thing against the Gospel of Christ I am heartily sorry Silence Commanded L. Ch. Bar. You are both persons of that ingenuous and liberal education as I hope I shall not need to tell you what it is to die you have had a great a deal of time to think of it you could not but think of this issue of your doings long ago and therefore I shall spare my labour of telling you what it is to die and of that eternity that you are to enter into only give me leave in a few words in relation to both of your professions to say something to shew the nature and hainousness of this offence the murther of the King if you were not
October 11th 1660. The Court being Assembled the Keeper was commanded to set the Prisoners to the Bar. Thomas Harrison Adrian Scroop John Carew John Jones Gregory Clement Thomas Scot were brought to the Bar accordingly After which Silence was Commanded Court You that are Prisoners at the Bar if you or any of you desire Pen Ink and Paper you shall have it and if you or any of you will Challenge any of the Jury you may when they come to be Sworn and that before they are Sworn Sir Thomas Allen being called was desired to look on the Prisoner and lay his Hand on the Book his Oath was then read to him viz. You shall well and truly try and true deliverance make between Our Sovereign Lord the King and the Prisoners at the Bar whom you shall have in charge according to your Evidence So help you God Sir Joshua Ash being next called Mr. Scroop excepted against him Sir Jeremy Whichcot Baronet being next to be Sworn Mr. Harrison excepted against him James Halley Esquire being next to be Sworn Mr. Scot excepted against him Court If you will not agree speaking to the Prisoners in your Challenges we must be forced to Try you severally Henry Mildmay Esq being called next Mr. Scroop excepted against him Court We must needs Try them severally therefore set them all aside but Harrison Court Gentlemen you that are excepted must not depart the Court. Sir Joshua Ash being again called was excepted against by Mr. Harrison Sir Jeremy Whichot Baronet James Halley Esq Henry Mildmay Esq Christopher Abdy Esq Being called again were severally excepted against by the Prisoner Court Mr. Harrison You know the Law You must say I Challenge him Mr. Harrison I shall Sir Ralph Hartley being next called and being very sick humbly prayed to be excused by the Court which was granted Arthur Newman was called next Mr Harrison May I not ask of what Quality he is Court No Sir You are to Challenge him or not to Challenge him Mr. Harrison I Challenge him Thomas Blith was next called and also Challenged Here the People seemed to laugh Mr. Harrison My Lord I must make use of my Liberty in this Case Court God forbid Then Grover Robert Clark and Richard Whalley were called and by Mr. Harrison Challenged Court Mr. Harrison you know many to Challenge If you go beyond the Number at your own peril be it Mr. Harrison My Lord pray tell me what it is Court You say very well God forbid but you should know You may Challenge five and thirty Peremptorily If you go beyond you know the Danger Mr. Harrison My Lord I do not this to keep you off from the Business William Vincent and Henry Twiford were then called and Challenged John Lisle was next called Mr. Harrison I do not know him Mr. Lisle Nor I you Mr. Harrison He was Sworn Thomas Franklin Sworn Thomas Winter Challenged Richard Nichol Sworn Moyce being sick prayed Excuse which was granted accordingly Richard Cheyney Challenged Allen Parsons Challenged Henry Edlin called Mr. Harrison I Challenge him Mr. Harrison Let him be Sworn Court No No. Whereupon he was set aside Mr. Harrison If I have any Apprehension or knowledg of them that 's the thing that leads me to it as touching this man he may be Sworn Court When he is Challenged he cannot be recalled Mr. Harrison I am content Samuel Greenhill Sworn Thomas Bide Challenged John Page Challenged Richard Rider Challenged Mr. Harrison Lest I may run into an Hazard in making use of that Liberty which the Law gives me in this Case and having not taken Notice of any Perfons Challenged I mean as to the Number I desire your Officer that takes Notice may acquaint me with the Number Court You shall know it God forbid the contrary Edward Rolph was called next Mr. Harrison Mr. Rolph is his Name Let him be sworn Sworn Francis Beal Challenged John Kirk Challenged Charles Pitfield Challenged John Smith Challenged Bell Sworn Edward Franklin Challenged William Whitcomb Challenged Samuel Harris Sworn John Collins Challenged Thomas Snow Sworn William Blunt Challenged George Rigth Challenged John Nichol of Finchley Sworn Timothy Taylor Challenged Thomas Fruin Challenged Richard Abel Challenged Thomas Morris Sworn Ambrose Scudamore Challenged Ralph Halsel Challenged George Tirry Challenged Court You have Challenged Thirty three already Mr. Harrison I pray the Names may be read to me to see if it be so Court When you come to Thirty five you shall have the Names read John Galliard Challenged Thomas Swallow Challenged Court Now read their Names to him Which were read accordingly In all thirty five Challenged George Pickering was next called and Sworn Then they were called over who were admitted viz. Sir Thomas Allen John Lisle Thomas Francklin Richard Nichol Samuel Greenhil Edward Rolph Bell Samuel Harris Thomas Snow John Nichol Thomas Morris George Pickering and Sworn Proclamation was then made If any man can inform my Lords the King 's Justices the King ' s Serjeant or the King's Attorney before this Inquest be taken let them come forth and they shall be heard for now the Prisoner stands at the Bar upon his Deliverance And all those bound by Recognizance to appear let them come forth and give their Evidence or else to forfeit their Recognizance George Masterson James Nutley Robert Coytmore Holland Simson and William Jessop Witnesse were called Court Gentlemen that are not of the Jury Pray clear the Passage The Prisoner is here for Life and Death let him have Liberty to see the Jury Clerk Thomas Harrison Hold up thy Hand Clerk Look upon the Prisoner you that are Sworn You shall understand that the Prisoner at the Bar stands Indicted by the Name of Thomas Harrison late of Westminster in the Country of Middlesex Gentleman for that He together with John Lisle c. Here the Indictment was read upon which Indictment be hath been Arraigned and thereunto hath pleaded Not Guilty and for his Trial hath put himself upon God and the Countrey which Countrey you are Now your Charge is to enquire whether he be Guilty of the High Treason in Manner and Form as he stands Indicted or Not guilty If you find that he is guilty you shall enquire what Goods and Chattels he had at the time of committing the said Treason or at any time sithence If you find that he is Not guilty you shall enquire whether he did fly for it if you find that he fled for it you shall enquire of his Goods and Chattels as if you had found him Guilty if you find that he is Not guilty nor that he did fly you shall say so and no more And take heed to your Evidence Mr. Keeling Enforced the Charge at large After whom Sir Henneage Finch His Majesties Solicitour General in these words MAY it please Your Lordships we bring before your Lordships into Judgment this day the Murtherers of a King A man would think the Laws of God and Men had so fully secured
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
speak with his Parliament I rising up one told me I must not be heard for the President was to give Judgement and said there was an order that none should speak in Court Mr. Downes did move and they did adjourn the Court and I was glad I got out Cromwell laughed and smiled and jeared in the Court of Wards I hope your Lordship will be pleased to consider I was no Contriver no Soldier that put the force upon the House that erected the Court None of the Law-makers or did any thing maliciously against the King My Lord I was looked upon with an evil eye for regarding the King's friends in the Country Gray he told me the King would not die I hope he will not said I. The next day on Monday I went to the House they were labouring to get hands for his Execution at the Door I refused and went into the House saith Cromwell those that are gone in shall set their hands I will have their hands now That night I went to the Lord Grays and he said I am afraid they will put him to death I said so also My Lord I have been a great sufferer I was drawn in trapan'd into it since being a friend to the Kings friends I am almost ruined in my estate I beseech your Lordships make the best interpretation I hope you will believe I was no Contriver I humbly lay hold upon the Kings mercy and favour I came in upon the Proclamation I pray that this Honourable Court will prefer my Petition to the King and both Houses of Parliament which the Court then received William Heveningham My Lord in 1648. we were under a force under the tyranny of an Army they were our Masters for a malicious and a traiterous heart I had not I do absolutely deny the signing the Warrant for summoning the Court and also that Warrant for execution of the King at the time of sealing I had that Courage and Boldness that I protested against it Counsel We do not question him for that but for sitting in the high Court of Justice and that upon the day of the sentence do you deny that Heveningham My Lord I cannot say positively Counsel If you deny the matter of fact it must be proved Heveningham I cannot say positively but it may be I might Counsel Either say positively you did or else let the Witnesses be call'd Heveningham Truly my Lord I think I did but my after-actions Lord Chief Baron Mr. Heveningham that shall be considered Counsel My Lord to sit upon the day of Sentence was high Treason in it self and is an evidence of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death Hev I shall lay hold of the Declaration I came in upon the Proclamation I pray your Lordships to interceed for me to the King and both Houses of Parliament I pray the mercy of this Court L. C. B. You of the Jury they have all confessed and therefore you may go together Simon Meyne My Lords I have forgot my Petition it is at my lodging I desire I may send it at night John Downes and Peter Temple prayed the like favour L. Ch. B. Do send them they shall be received The Jury having consulted together a certain time they went to their places Clerk Gentlemen are you agreed of your verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall say for you Jury Our Fore-man Clerk John Downes hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner how say you is he guilty of High Treason whereof he stands indicted and hath been arraigned or not guilty Forem Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper What Goods and Chattels c. Forem None to our knowledge And the like verdicts at the same time passed in the same manner against Vincent Potter Augustine Garland Symon Meyne James Temple Peter Temple Thomas Waite and William Heveningham Potter I hope I may be freed from Irons I am in pain and a man of bulk L. Ch. B. We can give no order in it we must leave it to the Sheriff Potter I begg it of you my Lord. L. Ch. B. We must leave it to the Sheriff Mr. Heveningham You must withdraw from the Bar. Clerk Officer bring down VValler Fleetwood Hacker Axtel Hulet Penington Marten Millington Titchborne Roe Lilburne Smith and Harvey and set them to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Hardress VValler hold up thy hand thou hast been Indicted and found guilty of High Treason what canst thou say why judgment should not pass on thee to dy according to Law VValler My Lords I am now it seems Convicted by Law and so adjudged Your Lordships the other day on my desire told me I might have liberty to speak upon my trial I must now beg the like upon a condemned person L. Ch. B. You are Convicted not Condemned Waller My Lords I was the first that pleaded Guilty I bless God that he gave me a heart to do it I find most peace in the doing of it and since there is nothing left but hopes of Mercy I humbly submit it to your Lordships to hear me in this sad condition that that may make me seem more capable of mercy I have my Lords been so unhappy to have been transplanted out of my Country these thirty years I have been but once these eleven years in England this must needs make me a stranger L. Ch. B. I must not hinder you because it is for mercy that you plead but consider with your self whether it will not be better to give it in a Petition I leave it to you we can do nothing in point of Mercy but Judgment Waller Onely this My Lord whether I am not the more capable of your mercy L. Ch. B. That you may understand it the Act of Indempnity of Parliament hath excepted you yet upon some qualifications we are to proceed according to Law that is to go to Conviction and Judgment The Act sayes that after Judgment there shall be no execution but that it shall be suspended till a further Act of Parliament to be passed for that purpose so that in the mean time we are to proceed no further then Judgment That which concerns Mercy is referred to another place If you please to say any thing to satisfie us or to go by way of Petition it must be left to you but what you say for mercy is nothing to us Waller I humbly thank your Lordships for this clear and noble dealing and withall I would beg that these people that are witnesses of my shame and guilt may know that it was a force and temptation upon me I shall not insist much I have said that I did plead guilty which was most safe to my own Conscience yet I should make it appear that I did appear more to preserve the King from Tryal and Sentence then any other Lord Finch Sir Hardress Waller I have heard of late of your sorrow which I was glad to hear of because you are my kinsman both by your Father and Mothers side and also my