probat And by him the Ordinary ought not to suffer the Executor to refuse after he hath once medled with the Goods of the Testator for if before the probat he had released a Debt and after he proves the Will this hath made the release good Walsh probat maketh the Release of the Executor made before good because it is a consummation of the Will and refers to the death Dier Chief Justice If the Ordinary commit and after the Metropolitan commit to another because the intestate hath Goods of the value of 10 l. in diverse Dioces 10. H 7.18 this disproves the authority of the first Administrator and avoids his mean Acts and by Keeble the second Administrator shall have Trespass against the first for taking of the first Goods So 7. E. 4.12 Executor pleads that he hath proved the Testament the action of the Administrator depending against him a good Bar because the power of the Administrator disproved and mean acts avoided by Probat of the Testament and the Executor which is made not knowing of it if he agree after good seems to be 3. H. 7.14 The Ordinary ought to award Proces against the Executor to come in for to prove the Testament before he commits the Administration The Probat here disproves the Administration for ever and proves the Executor to be full Executor from the death of the Testator and is not like to the cases before fol. 239. because the mean time in which no Executor and this time the Ordinary hath authority The Seal of the Ordinary put to the administration is but matter in fact and no estopple and the executor shall not be inforced to sue in the spiritual Court to recall this but shall avoid it by Plea or by matter in fact as 44. E. 3.16 A. bringeth Debt against B. as administrator and sheweth certainly how his Deed was as he ought B. saith he and another are executors Judgement of the Writ and shew forth the Testament to prove it A. offers to aver that he died intestate B. saith to it he shall not be received contrary to the Testament proved and under Seal to take the Plaintiff from his averment but that he shall have it and try it by the Country also the taking of Letters of Administration discharges not a Suit against those which were executors of their own wrong before 21. H. 6.8 2. R. 3.20 So 34. H. 6.14 in debt by the Administrator the Defendant received to avoid Letters of Administration by saying the dead made an executor and taking issue upon it Chapman against Dalton A Man makes a Lease for 21. years by Indenture and Covenants with his Lessee Tr. 7. El. in the K. B. Covenant and his Executors to make a new Lease for 21. years after the expiration of the first to the Lessee and his Assignes the Lessee dies and the Executor of the Executor brings Covenant after the first Lease determined against the Lessor and adjudged good 1. That the executor is an Assignee in Law to whom the Lease ought to be made and so the executor of an executor by the Common Law 2. That the Lease ought to be made to the Lessee if he were alive or to his Assignes in Deed and if he die Assignee in Deed then to his executor and although that the Covenant be in the Copulative in the Letter yet it shall be expounded disjunctive in sense for to avoid absurdity or impossibility 3. Admitting that the word Assignee were void or omitted out of the deed yet this shall be made to the executor for that the intent was such which shall be performed where the words could not Baber and Wray argued for the Defendant as it is abridged by Ash fol. 50. Fleetwood and another apprentice for the Plaintiff Every Covenant and Grant shall be taken most strong against the Maker and most available to the other And if the words thereof have a double sense that which is for the benefit of the Grantee shall be taken then the word Assigned here shall be drawn to so effectuall sense for the avail of the Grantee And if the word Assignee as the Councel on the part of the Defendant would have it applied to a limitation viz. in the sense of an Habendum to him and his Assignes for 21. years it is void and conveys no benefit to the Grantee because if I Lease to A. for 21. years and his Assignes shall have this as largely as I do vest this Lease in him and his Assignes because the Law gives power to him to assign it to another Assignee hath two senses in the one it signifies the person to whom the thing granted or given shall be afterwards conveyed by him which hath the thing as the Lessor Grants to the Lessee for years That he or his Assignes shall have twenty Carts of Wood annually in such a Wood Assignee there hath the sense of the person to whom he shall Assign the Lease So one warrants Land to the Feoffee his Heirs and assignes there the second Feoffee shal vouch So I sell a Horse upon Condition That if I pay 40 s. to him or his Assignees that I shall have the horse again Assignee there is he to whom he grants the horse but such Assignee is not in our case because he hath not any estate first made and such a one is Assignee after the thing granted in the second it contains the person to whom the thing which is to be made and is not made shall be made as I am bound to make a Feoffment or give a horse to you or your Assignee there the Assignee is such a person which you shall name to me to receive and the Assignee in this sense is before the things done or granted and Assignes in this sense is in the first also But with this in the first sense we have not to do here there are Assignes in Deed and Law in Deed where you name such a one to whom I shall make the Feoffment or give the horse in Law where you name no man to receive then the Executor shall have it because the Law saith That they are your Assignes to such purpose and present your person as to receive any Chattels real or personal So 27. H. 8 2. Executor is an Assignee in Law to take a Rental where the Lessee bound himself to deliver it to the Lessor or his Assignes at the end of the Term a true rental and the Lessor made no Assignee he is an ill expounder which confounds the Text. And therefore here and the Copulative shall be taken for or the Disjunctive for otherwise the sense will be absurd that the Lessee if he had been alive at the end of the first Lease should not take a new Lease until he names his Asasignee or impossible as joyning his assignee in law with him because he cannot have an Executor in his life So in our Law a copulative is taken as a disjunctive and a disjunctive as a
their Husbands is contrary to the intent of the Statute and the intent ought to be thought on because the Purviewe extends not further then the intent of the makers of the Statute as the Wife infeoffs the Father of him with whom she intends to marry for to regive the Land to them after their intermarriage for lives or remainder in tayle to the Wife the Father doth so they have issue the Wife after the death of the Husband levies a Fine to other uses their issue may not enter yet it is with in the words of the Act of 11. H. 7. because the Father gave it to them But this cometh from the Wife her selfe by circumstance And the Father was but as an Instrument of it and therefore out of the intent of 11. H. 7. which restraineth the generalty of the letter of the Statute and maketh the Cases within the words out of the penalty of the Statute by the intent of the Makers As Infants and mad Men are excepted out of the Cases of Fellonies made by any Statute so neither those nor a Fem covert shall be concluded in the intent of the Statute which maketh them accessary which shall give them Meat Drink or other ayde to them which shall commit such an Act. So if a bargaine for Land be made before a Writ brought against him and the suite depending Livery and Seisen is made It is not Champarty 19. R. 2. because he ought to performe the bargaine made upon just consideration notwithstanding W. 2. Cap. 49. and Articul super Chart. Cap. 11. So a barr fee is within the letter but not the intent of the Statute of 32. H. 6. cap. 10. because appointed to the Sheriffe in the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court for his labour and attendance when the Prisoners are brought to their delivery 21. H. 7.16 So Wreck if a Man Dog or Car escapes alive shall be kept that the party may have his goods if he claimes within the yeare by W. 1. cap. 4. is intended of such things which will endure so long and not perish in the meane time as are Lemans Oringes c. So a rent granted by tenant in tayle for a release of right in other Lands is good 44. E. 3.21 because for the benefit of the estate tayle And W. 2. De donis c. intends not to restraine that which amends the estate tayle So Parsonages and Vicarages are within the words but out of the sense and intent of 1. E. 6. cap. 14. which inlargeth the words of the Statute and maketh that Cases within the like mischeife shall be within the Purview by equity as by the Book of entrys fol. 406. a man shall recover double damages for costs sustained with force by equity of 4. H. 4. cap. 8. which gives this for disseisen of the Land So that Executor which cometh first by distresse shall answer by equity of 9. E. 3. cap. 5. which speaketh of Executors by equity of Gloucester the Lessor shall have wast against the Lessee for half a yeare or for twenty weeks which pleads yeares So 1. E. 6. cap. 12. which takes away Clergy for stealing Horses takes it away also for one Horse because included in the Plurall Number and therefore Plowden disallows 2. E. 6. cap. 33. which taketh away Clergy for the stealing of one Horse as a superfluous Statute and was made in vaine And so 1. E. 6 cannot of Law but morall vertue which reforme the Law and the other equity is Quasi equality because in the like reason in the like Law Sobye against Molins TIthes shall be payd for the Boughs of Hornebeame H. 17. El. in the Kings Bench. Attachment upon prohibition Hasell Sallows Maple and such Trees which are not fit for building and so of the Trees themselves although that the Trees and Boughs are above the age of one and twenty yeares for they are not great Trees which are exempted and priviledged of Tithes by the Statute of 45. E. 3. cap. 3. or rather by the Common Law in affirmance of which this Statute was made as appeareth 50. E. 3.10 But Tithes shall not be payd for Ashes Oaks and Elmes Beech and such like Trees which are fit for building and of the age of twenty yeares nor for the Branches of them which are of the age of twenty yeares Quere if the Branches are within such age as the Timber trees which use to be lopped and lopt if Tithe shal be payd for them and it seemeth Tithes shall be payd of them by the Book The use at this day is upon suggestion to have a prohibition that the party shall be bound by Obligation or Recognisans to the King to preferr a Bill of attachment against the party which sues in the spirituall Court if he requires it and upon it to declare and joine issue or demurr upon the right of Tithes and award consultation which Plowden held vicious First for that the Defendant is not Actor and therefore may not have consultation upon such proceedings Secondly For that the Judgement upon the Attachment ought to be to acquit or attaint the party of the Contempt and not proceed upon the right of Tithes Thirdly For that the Plaintiffe cometh into the Court voluntarily Scilicet by his Recognisans to exhibit his Attachment where he ought to be brought in voluntarily by Process Fourthly Because the suggestion of the Attachment is false Fifthly For that if the Plaintiffe will not proceed the Defendant hath no remedy but a Recognisance forfeited to the King But Plowden held it to be the best course after the prohibition that the Defendant sues out a Scire facias against the Plaintiffe Quare consultatio concedi non debeat And upon this the Plaintiffe may declare and the matter shall be tryed and the Defendant may have consultation and then he will be an Actor Sanders and Archers Case ARcher gave Poison to Sanders to Poison his Wife H. 18. El. the Report of the opinions of Dyer Cheife Justice and Barham Justices of Assises in Warw. and Sanders gives this to his Wife in a roasted Apple which did eate part of it and gave the residue to their daughter being an Infant and after the Wife recovers and the Infant dyes and it was adjudged Murder in Sanders for which he was hanged but not in Archer for he was acquit to be no accessary to this Murder First For that Sanders had an evill intent of Murder at the beginning of his Act to kill his Wife and therefore the consequent of his Act by which the Daughter dyes shall be adjudged according to the commencement So if a man shoots at one and kills another or lyeth in waite to kill one and kills another otherwise it is where he hath no ill intent of killing any as to lay poyson to kill Rats and one eates of it and dyeth Secondly The consent of Archer to kill the Woman may not bee conjectured further then he gave it
it ought to be conjoyned to certainty as 9. H. 7.3 by Fineux and 6. H. 4.7 Debt upon payment at two days whereof the one is come abates by shewing of the Plaintiff the same because he hath shewed falsity So 20. H. 6.30 one ought to reherse the Stat. upon which he bringeth Champerty for to Warrant this certainly which ought to appear alwaies to the Court but not in one manner as sometimes by the replication in Assizes sometimes by Verdict as in aquare impedit the value of the Church In Ward the value of the Marriage in Detinue the value of the goods as in 20. H. 6. Champerty was brought which was not Warranted by any Statute and there Newton said That if the party could not shew to them some Statute by which it is Warranted that they would award that the Writ should abate And for that which hath been said that he needs not to recite the Statute and therefore misrecital is not material it seemed to them That howbeit he need not yet if he recites it and there is none such then he hath failed of his substance for the Court will not aid him nor think he intendeth any other thing then what he hath shewed and by this abundance in reciting more then needs hurts the party many times And therefore in 20. H. 6. fol. 42. contrary to 8. H. 6.33 Fitz. H. Count 15. of forging of false Deeds the Writ was of Diversa facta and minimenta c. and he counted but of one onely and by assent of all the Justices it was awarded That the Writ should abate and so abundance abated the Writ And if one maketh Title in Assize in his plaint where he need not yet if it be not formall all shall abate and yet it was abundance and more then he was compelled to do So in the principal case And where it was said That the Defendants by their Demurrer have confessed such Act of Parliament as the plaintiff hath declared they held that admitting this to be a confession yet this binds nor the Court which is a third person as appears by 10. E. 4. Wherein Trespass of Cattle taken brought by the Lessee for years the Defendant said That the Lessor held of him by Rent which was Arear and he took the beasts for it the Plaintiff said nothing Arear and there although the Defendant had admitted the Writ good yet the opinion of the Justices was That the Writ should abate for that the Lord was Defendant And so if the Defendant will admit good an appeal brought by the wife of the death of her Father yet the Court ought to abate it although the party affirm it and a Demur-is a Confession of all matters in Fact but not of matters in Law For by the Demurrer he puts it to the Judgement of the Court and confesseth not the Law against himself although the King may wave the Issue and so Demur in Law and recover afterwards fol. 236. and he hath many other prerogatives yet shall he be bound by misrecitall or by misusing or misconceiving of his Action and there shall abate the Writs where he is sole party as in the case of a common person à fortiori where another is party with the King as here the Plaintiff ought to shew certainty of the Lease here by Cook by other Justices not In Decies tantum certainty of the Summ received here because he shall not recover ten times as much and may not without shewing in Champerty the certainty of the first plea here because privy to the Record So in Trespass if the Defendant pleads Franck-Tenenemt the Plaintiff intitles himself by a Lease made by him the Defendant will shew that he made a Feoffment and that he entred for Forfeiture he ought to shew the name of the Feoffee and certainty of the Feoffment because he is privy and in all cases of privies he ought to shew the certainty as 2. H. 7.6 in Bar of Dower the Heir pleaded detainer of evidences he shall shew certainty for he is privy to them that he affirms to appertain to him of a bag sealed with Charters not 18. H. 8.1 because the bag sealed is certain Indictment cujusdam ignoti good Stamford fol. 95. and after fol. 129. Statute penal here not taken by equity by all the Justices as an Attaint shall not 14. H. 7.13 nor the Statute which augments bread by evil making nor things out of the words shall not be taken by equity But the words may be expounded beneficially as Treason by the Statute 25. E. 3. for killing of a Master so of a Mistris are of one effect 19. H. 6.47 but not by equity but rather within words Plural number contains singular by Hales So here pretenced Rights and Titles as shall be punished for forging one false Deed yet 1. H. 5. cap. 3. speaks of false Deeds So for Entry into one Tenement yet 5. R. 2. cap. 7. speaks of Entry into Tenements under this word any the lesser Estate is contained in the greater as 23. H. 6.10 prohibits that a Sheriff shall Lease his County to farm in any manner shall not Lease part thereof after fol. 124. contrary by Hales This Lease here made by one in possession is out of the Statute because it is not averred to be a pretenced right viz. the bargain and Lease to be made for maintenance contrary Cook for this was the point of the Statute as 9. H. 6.26 if published onely yet the Stat. is in the Copulative for forging and publishing this within the Statute but ought to aver That it was published to trouble the possession and Title of the Plaintiff for this is the point of the Statute So here the Lease ought to be averred for maintenance for this is the point of our Statute Montague Chief Justice He that is in possession may buy the pretenced right of another he which is out of possession if he promise or bargain to depart with the Land when he shall get the possession is within the Statute and maketh it void by the Common Law wherefore the Statute affirms it and adds a greater pain to the thing done against the Common Law and the Statute shall be meant to avoid a bargain of Right when out of possession he which hath possession but one hour alwaies may sell or it shall be a hard Exposition Acts expounded against the words of the Statute because Law and Reason allows it As Tenant hanging a Precipe Infeoffs his Son and Heir 6. E. 3. fol. 274. after fol. 204. good contray to the words of the Articuli super Chartas cap. 2. because the Son may not maintain to the Father but is bound to aid his father So an Heir may abet his Mother for to bring an appeal as W. 2. Cap. 12. So a Trespass in a Park without hunting shall not be punished by a year before refers to the Clause before onely so that the Clause being in possession Reversion or Remainder
this shall remain is a limitation of time when this shall vest and not a condition by Hinde and Montague 6. Admitting that it be a condition yet a remainder may depend upon a condition By Hales Hinde and Montague and adjudged accordingly 7. The Plaintiff hath not conveyed to himself Title to have benefit of the breach of the condition if it be broken By Montague Pollard Serjeant for the Plaintiff Except that the Form of the Plea is sufficient 1 Because he doth not aver his continual residence after the Remainder happened but after his entry which may happen to be long time after and so although that he hath performed the words of the condition which hath not satisfied the intent thereof yet he hath not performed the condition because the intent was That he should have all the Mannor So 21. H. 6.10 A man is bound that his Feoffees of the Mannor of D. should grant a Rent of 40. s. to the Plaintiff He had three Feoffees and two of them grant the said Rent to him and there all the Justices said That it shall be intended all the Feoffees so that alwaies the intent of the condition ought to be as well performed as the words of the condition and here the intent of the condition appears to be That Hospitality shall be kept upon the Grange continually from the beginning to the end of the Term which is the death of the Husband and the Wife and here he hath not shewed that he entred within as short time as he conveniently could after the death of the Husband and Wife and therefore because he hath not shewed and averred this he hath not shewed the performance of the condition and therefore his plea is not good For in all cases where the time is issuable he ought also to shew it certainly and therefore in 32. H. 6. it is held That if a man plead a Lease for years made to him that he ought to shew what day the Lease was made because it is issuable So in 33. H. 6.44 In debt by an Executor the Defendant saith That the Testator made the Plaintiff and one R. his Executors at L. the which R. is alive and not named judgement of the Writ and the Plaintiff confessing it saith That after this time last assigned by the Plaintiff that the Testator made the Plaintiff his sole Executor in Middlesex and the Defendant saith That after this time last assigned by the Plaintiff that the Testator made the Plaintiff and R. his Executors after this time and the Plea of the Defendant was not held good for that the day on which the Plaintiff and R. were made Executors is uncertain So 3. H. 6.33 In Trespass the Defendant pleads in Bar the day of the retaining of the Plaintiff who traverseth the Bar and the Defendant enforced to shew the day certain Matter in Law As to the matter in Law it seemeth to him that the Remainder is void because it ought alwaies to be limited to take its effect after the partricular estate ended and not during the particular estate for if it be limited and appointed to take its effect during the particular estate then it shall be utterly void As if A. Leases to B. for life the Remainder for life and if B. dies that it shall remain over to a stranger in Fee this Remainder is void for that it is appointed to take effect immediately after the first estate for life ended for if the Remainder in Fee should commence then it shall avoid the Remainder for life so if a Lease be made to two the Remainder over in Fee after the death of the first of them this Remainder is void because the Survivor shall have the Land So in the principal case it is given to the Baron and Fem for their lives the Remainder to the eldest son for life upon conditon That if the eldest die living husband and wife that then it shall remain to the Defendant for life which cannot be for the first estate at this time continues and if the Remainder shall be good it drowns the estate of husband and wife and therefore the Remainder void and also for that it is limited to commence upon condition which enures alwaies in privity therefore if a lease for life be made rendring rent and upon condition That if the Rent be arear that then it shall remain to a stranger in Fee if the Rent be arear and not paid the remainder is void for the Remainder which commence upon condition is not good otherwise it is if an estate be made for life upon condition That if the Tenant for Life dies it shall remain over this Remainder is good because that it commenceth upon the Determination of the I state the which is certain and therefore no condition because conditions are alwaies incertain and may be performed or broken and as our Law is for to know the time certain when the things pass from one to another and namely Free-hold because the Law hath it in greater estimation then other things and so to prevent contention hath ordained Ceremonies to be used as in every Feoffment Livery and in every Grant Reversion or Rents c. That Attornment shall be made the which are points certain containing time and by them Estates pass Rules to know when Remainders are good The Law hath appointed that every Remainder shall have three things by the matters aforesaid as Notes and Rules certain for to discern when good The first is an Estate precedent made at the same time that the remainder Commences and that the particular Estate continue when the Remainder vests and that the remainder be from the Donor at the time of Livery and if any of the said three things fail the Remainder is void And therefore for the first point if the Lessor confirm the state of his Tenant for years the Remainder in Fee this Remainder is vold for that the Estate for years was made before the Remainder So if a Lessor disseise his Tenant for Life and after makes a new Lease to him for Life the remainder in Fee this Remainder is void because it is a Remitter to his Estate So an Estate precedent was not made at the time of the remainder and therefore the Remainder is void So the Heir endows his Mother Remainder in Fee by reason of Relation and so the precedent Estates are made before the Remainder appointed Secondly That the particular Estate continue when the remainder vests as 21. H. 7.12 per Frowick Lease for Life upon Condition That if he doth not such an Act that his Estate shall cease and that then the Remainder over is void because the Estate precedent is determined before the Remainder appointed and the Remainder must vest during the particular Estate Thirdly because the Remainder passes from the Lessor at the time of the delivery as Hales Hinde and Montague say and as it is proved by the Cases before cited So Perkins 12. and 19.
Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in Life passes from the Lessor presently although it vests not presently but here the Remainder passeth not presently because the Condition precedes the Remainder as 15. H. 7. 1. if A. Grant to B. That when he is promoted to a Benefice or do such an Act he shall have an Annuity there he shall shew his Promotion if he demands his Annuity because it is a Condition precedent and to him which maketh the Grant but if he Grants an Annuity until he be promoted there he shall not shew it because the Promotion is subsequent to the Annuity and will defeat the Annuity and therefore it shall be shewed by the other party which is contray So 7. E. 3.10 A Lessee for eight years rendring 10. s. yearly and if he holdeth over to him and his heirs an action of Debt is maintainable during the Term for the Rent is a Chattle because the Fee passeth not presently for that the Condition precedes the Fee So 6. R. 2. a Lease to two for years upon Condition That if the Lessee aliens within the Term or die he shall have Fee it is holden that the Fee passeth not presently because the Condition precedes it which Cases prove That the Remainder passes not out of the Lessor at the time of the Livery albeit that the Condition precede the Remainder and proves also That the Remainder Commenceth upon Condition and proves also That the Remainder is appointed to begin after the Commencement of the particular Estate the which is contrary to the grounds of Law and therefore and for the said other causes the Remainder shall be void And so for the insufficiencie of the matter of the Bar and Form also the Plaintiff shall recover Cook Serjeant to the contrary As to the two Exceptions which have been moved That the Plea is not good because he shews not that he hath been resiant after the deaths of the Husband and Wife alwaies nor what day he entred Sir I take it That it shall be taken that he entred immediately after the death of the Husband and Wife for the Defendant hath pleaded by way of Bar and if the Bar hath matter of substance and is good to a common intent it sufficeth although it be not good to every special intent and therefore in the Case of 33. H. 6. fol. 24. where the Defendant pleads That the Testator made the Plaintiff and one R. his Executor Judgement c. The Plea was good without shewing that he was made after that the Plaintiff was made sole Executor because it shall be intended after So 10. H. 7. 15. by Keble in Trespas the Defendant pleads his Free-hold good because good by Common intendment yet the Plaintiff might have an Estate for years and it may stand with his Bar and by which he may punish the default but such special matter will not be intended So 6. E. 4.1 in Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant saith That he hath done such things as was contained in the Indenture and at Issue and found for the Plaintiff and spoken to in Arrest of Judgement because the Defendant said not that the two Covenants were all and so had not alleadged the performance of all but held good because by Common intent there shall not be intended more then two Covenants if the Plaintiff shew not the contrary So 3. H. 6.4 in Formedon he gave not prima facie a good Bar because it intends a general gift and yet it may be That the Land was recovered in value and then the Plea is not apt for other Land was given So 3. H. 6.3 In Debt nothing in their hands pleaded by Executors good yet it may be that other goods first not the Testators at the day of his death are come to their hands in place instead of other goods So 21. H. 6.17 In Assise the Defendant was in by discent where he had a mean Title which tolled the Assise of the other shall not be void by the said recovery but this shall not be intended without shewing so discent and entry in Bar good yet it may be that a stranger abated and dyed seised and the Heir could not enter but if shall not be intended without shewing specially but when a thing Commenceth in respect of the time then the certainty of the time shall be shewed fol. 24.27.33 as 20. H. 7.12 by Rede A Servant which demanded 20. s. Sallary for his service by the year ought to shew the expiration of the year because the Action is given in respect of the year past and the time is parcell of the cause of the Demand and precedes the Demand but here the time pursues the Remainder and is not cause of the Remainder and therefore we ought to shew it so certainly as where time gains a thing for here it goeth in defeasance of the thing and therefore the Bar is good notwithstanding the said two Exceptions besides it seemeth to me the Remainder is good For first he hath an Estate here upon which the Remainder may be grounded here the remainder is appointed thereupon but the cause wherefore the Remainder shall not be good is alleadged in two great points viz. because the Fee passeth not presently forth of the Lessor and also for that the Remainder cannot pass upon Condition And it seems to me That the Remainder passeth out of the Lessor presently howbeit that it vests not presently as in Litl 81. A Lease for five years if he pay within the first two that then he shall have Fee the Fee passeth out of the Lessor presently so the Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in life and a Remainder may Commence upon Condition as a Lease for life upon Condition That I. S. Marry my Daughter during the state for Life which shall remain to him is good because he hath an Estate upon which it may be grounded So 34. E. 3. Devise for Life upon Condition That if the Heir to whom the Reversion discends disturbs Tenant for Life or his Executors of their Administration That then the Land shall remain to the Daughter of the Devisor and to her Heirs and dyeth Tenant for Life dyeth the Son of the Daughter brings his Formedon against the Heir because he disturbs the Tenant and also the Executors of the Tenant traverse it and at issue and upon this issue is joyned which should not have been so if the Remainder had not been good Also if Assent as 18. E. 4. 12. by Catesby ante 8. post 31. to the Diseisen made before to anothers use may Traverse the Free-hold from one to another à fortiori a condition may namely where the Franck-Tenement precedes to which a Condition may be annexed Morgan Serjeant for the Plaintiff The Plea is not good because it doth not shew the day in certain of the death of W. nor of the Husband and Wife but he argued not this Also it is not good because he shewed not the
compulsive so that he shall have prejudice if he doth not but is a thing obligable at the will of the Defendant and then his entry is not material but is at pleasure and therefore the not shewing thereof shall not make the Plea vicious Admitting that it be a Condition yet it is subsequent and in Defeasance of his Estate 30. And therefore shall not be shewed by him but by him which shall have benefit by the breaking of it So if a Condition be enlarged which may be good leaveth that out which is material because it is Surplussage Also it hath no Livery for to convey Title nor hath it enabled him any waies to take the benefit of the breach of the Condition if it were broken because he hath Demurred generally upon the Bar in which the Defendant hath not acknowledged any reversion And so it appeareth not by the Record that he is other then a meer stranger And by the Common Law no man shall take benefit of a Condition but such a one as is privy And therefore 38. H. 8.34 Pattentees of the King after 177. Also if it be a Condition during the Term it shall be intended all the Term as a man bound to perform Covenants is bound to perform all and his Feoffees fol. 30. Yet if he be sometimes absent and his Family there it is good because the Law shall have a reasonable Construction in things alwaies If W. dies then the Remainder is a Limitation and appoyntment of the time when the remainder shall vest But admitting that it be a Condition yet a Remainder may depend upon a Condition which every lawfull owner of the land may give to what person or persons and in what manner and at what time he pleaseth if his gift be not against Law or repugnant as 10. E. 3.39 A man makes to his Termor in surety of his Term a Charter of Feoffment upon Condition That if he be disturbed of any part of his Term that then he shall have Fee he was disturbed and afterwards outed and recovers in Assise which proves that the Franck-Tenant passed upon condition express to the Livery be it mediate or immediate it stales not the Remainder because his Livery shall be taken most strongly against him So 27. H. 8.24 Remainder to a stranger if the gift fail for bearing of the standard So in Plessintons case it is held That the estate of Free-hold there could not Commence upon Condition but the cause wherefore was because he had not the Free-hold upon performance of the Condition which was repugnancie So a Remainder upon condition contrary to the Law or impossible is not good because a Condition unlawfull or impossible may not obtain the thing by doing of it So if the Doâ—… aliens then it shall remain is not good because repugnant for when he hath aliened to one it may not remain to another Remainder ought to have estate precedent for that 9. H. 6.24 Lease to a Monk Remainder over void because a Monk hath not capacity and so the estate which precedes the Remainder void Remainder also ought to be of a thing in esse before and therefore a Grant of a rent out of land remainder in Fee void because the rent was not in esse before and the remainder here passeth presently by the Livery upon possibility to be afterwards performed and vests when W. dies and in the mean time rests in abeyance as 15. H. 7.10 Fee Tail passeth upon possibility That a Fem Covert and a married man may inter-marry and in the mean time the Inheritance viz. The Tail shall be in abeyance but holden there That they are seised in Tail presently and concludes that the Remainder is good and the pleading also and so the Plaintiff shall be Barred Plat against the Sheriffes of London ONe Goodlad was in Execution Ludgate upon a recovery in Debt had against him by plaint in the Guild-Hall of London 4 E. 6. In the Excheq and going with a Baston that is to say a Servant of the Gaolers attending upon him into Southwark in the County of Surrey and the Administrator of him which recovered brings his Bill of Debt into the Exchequer against the Sheriffs for the escape and adjudged that he should recover thereupon But no exceptions were taken to the Bill and the reasons of the Judgement were 1. For that the Action lyeth at the Common-Law by 45. E. 3.9 Debt against one Abbot or Prior and also for that That he had not remedy against him which escaped for by the esape he is discharged for ever against the party and the Goaler also and the Officer which suffers the escape is charged contrary to 13. H. 7.1 But the Action lay not by the Common Law by 42. ass 11. 2. Admitting that it lay not by the Common Law yet it lyeth by equity of the Statute of 1. R. 2. c. 12. which gives an Action against the Warden of the Fleet or by the equity of the Statute of Westm 2. c. 11. which gives an Action against the Gaoler which suffers an Accomptant for to escape 3. The defendants have admitted the action good by their Demurrer 4. That it is an escape because he was out of the Jurisdiction and Authority of the Sheriffs and that his Imprisonment is ended the last instant that he was in London and his escape began the first instant that he came into Southwark and so he was never in prison in Southwark for he had no guard there The effect of every suit contains and implies in it selfe 3. things First to shew the verity of the matter to the Judge thereof which is the duty of the party Secondly to have judgement to recover and execution thereupon and this is the duty of the Judge Thirdly the making of execution for to take the Defendants body and detain it in prison and this is the duty of the Officer and because he only hath offended it is reason that he be punished that is That he answer the loss to the Plaintiff for that he hath not any remedy against him which escapes nor the Gaoler never apprehended him because a personal thing once suspended is extinguished and therefore if the Debtee maketh the Debtor and another which surviveth the Debtor his Executors yet the Debt is extinct and the person of either of them discharged Therefore in respect that after the escape the Plaintiff shall not have other execution and so without any remedie against the Defendant in the first suit the Common Law which is Common Reason provides That the Plaintiff shall have an Action of Debt against the Gaoler in whose default the Execution of the Plaintiff or otherwise the Common Law will be defective in this point And therefore by 45. E. 3. 9. Abridged by Fitz. h. in Title Debt 130. which was before the Stat. of R. 2. where a Prior dative and removeable le ts one in Execution in his Guard for dammages recovered in his Court of Py-powder escape P.
imbesseling of a Habcas Corpora upon a Formedon between the Plaintiff and another holden good whithout shewing the Original and certainty of the Land and all the Record in certain because the Record is but a conveyance to the suit of Deceit and therefore for this cause cannot be gainsaid as to say Nultiel Record But where a Record is pleaded in Bar all shall be shewed certainly and is Traversable there in Conclusion or general Demurrer as petit judicium if the Plaintiff shall maintain the Action one shall have advantage of all defaults and of every thing mentioned in the Record and of every point that the Law gives him In Conclusion speciall of defaults onely alleadged in certain as here petit judicium if the Plaintiff shall maintain the action there if it be void for another cause then this which is mentioned he shall not have benefit of this of a thing void ab initio as the Obligation here because void by Statute so in avoidance of a Deed That he was not a man lettered and that it was read to him in another form So 24. H. 8. 28. because delivered as an Escrow upon Condition the Conclusion shall be so not his Deed because the matter proves that it was never his Deed of a thing voidable where it was void after because once is was a Deed the Conclusion shall be Judgement if Action because the duty is now extinct as 1. H. 7. 15. by release 35. H. 6. 18. for nonage 7. E. 4. 5. by dures When the Conclusion is nought and the matter in Law good Officium Judicis est for to give Verdict against the Plaintiff if it appeareth that he had not cause of Action howbeit that the Defendant hath lost the advantage thereof as it is here So 7. E. 4. 31. Trespass against B. and C. B. pleads not guilty C. pleads the gift of B. found guilty and found for C. no judgement for the Plaintiff because found against him So. appeal of a woman for the death of her father 10. E. 4. 7. because she shall not have an appeal of the death of any man except her husband or Trespass against the Lord by distress where nothing is in arear because the Statute is Non ideo puacatur dominus abate ex officio although the Defendant accepts the Writ good for the Plaintiff shall be barted by the Court ex officio and shall not have judgement although the Defendant admits his Title or by his Conclusion hath concluded himself of his advantage if it appeareth that he had no Title 1. The first branch is commanding and authorising the Sheriff to let to Bail persons manipernable by the Common Law viz. persons taken by Writ Bill or Warrant upon an Action personall or indictment of Trespass for it was indifferent if they were guilty or not made in affirmance of the Common Law 2. The second Branch viz. The exception was also made in the affirmance of the Common Law before for such persons which were in by condemnation execution Capias ut legat c. were not bailable before 3. The third is onely the purview which relates to the second branch as well as to the first for before refers to all this spoken of before as well the thing excepted as otherwise as a Lease for years of a Mannor except a Close rendring Rent the Lessee binds himself to perform all Covenants Grants and Agreements expressed or recited in the Indenture and after disturbs the Lessor of a thing excepted he hath forfeletd the Obligation because it is an Agreement for when he excepted the Close the other was contented with it and that the Lessor should occupy it and recited goes to the exception as to the rest 45. E. 3. 4. contained and recited goes to every Covenant in the Indenture An Act done Colore officii is extortion as if an Officer takes more for Fees then he ought And an Obligation taken of a prisoner for meat and drink is void because it is colore officii for he nor the Plaintiff are not bound to give him sustenance as he which distrains is not bound to give although he be in for Felony because 7. H. 4. 47. his goods are his untill he be attainted by the Common Law which is confirmed by 1. R. 3. c. 3. Rastal Forfeiture fol. 15. and if he dies for want of sustenance it is his own fault because that by presumption his ill demeanor bringeth him to such imprisonment The Statute of R. 3. restrains the Sheriff and other Officers to take Obligations of their prisoners except the Warden of the Fleet and the Kings Pallace at Westminster A Sheriff lets to mainprise one taken by Capias upon an indictment of Trespass which for the surety of the Sheriff makes an obligation to a stranger to keep his day is 7. E. 4. 5. held to be void because taken to another and not to the Sheriff onely according to the Statute Also there it is held if the Obligation hath not the Conditions expressed in the Statute That it is not the Deed of the party ex quo sequitur that he ought to conclude not his Deed keeping without dammage shall be intended by the generalty for all things Treasons Felonies Accounts and for all times if another thing is added by the Statute to be given it shall make all void as if a Condition be made according to the Statute and hath another thing not according to the Obligation is void So to add other words in a Formedon or Writ of Waste which are given by Statute all is void So to alien all the Land when he hath licence for part the licence is void in all by the Statute of 32. H. 8. because he hath exceeded the Authority thereby given to him The Statute saith That the Sheriff shall let persons mentioned therein to bail upon reasonable surety of sufficient persons in the plural number and because there is but one surety here the Obligation is void Also because the Statute saith That if it shall be taken in any other manner then is contained in the Statute if shall be void Also here by Plowden yet taken by one at large by the words of the first branch and those aid then third branch every person which extends to those at large nor for any person in their Ward which extends only to prisoners Kidwelly against Brand. LEease for years rendring 40. s. Rent by the year at H. out of the Land at the Feast of M. and if the Rent be behind H. 4. 5. E 6. In the Common Pleas. and not paid by the space of 40. daies after the said Feast then it shall be lawfull for him c. for to re-enter the Reversion is granted for Life the Grantee cometh to the Land 40. dales after M. to demand the Rent aforesaid but demanded it not and for not payment re-entred and adjudged lawfull 1. A Grantee for Life of a Reversio is an assignee within the Statute of 32.
Litl fol. 108. before fol. 140. two Tenants in Common grant 20. s. it shall enure as several Grants 34. ass fol. 11. Grants totum piscariam salvo stagno molendini sui yet the piscarie passes not for the stagno shall be excepted and not the piscarie because he hath a Reversion in the Propriety of the land and possession of the Ter-Tenancy The nature of an habendum is to give in large or qualifie Malitiosa juris interpretatio herere in verbis c. the words are but witnesses to the contract reversion includes land by all Brown Justice To the same intent of the Abbot and Covent and of Smith and his wife was to have the land pass as a Lease after the paticular estate ended and not otherwise and from that hour that their intent was to have the word reversion enure that way it seemed to him That the Law would warrant it for the land is included in the reversion for if it was not a man by Granting of a reversion could not have the Land in possession after the particular estate ended And a Feoffment of a Carue habendum the Mannor of D. is good if the Carue maketh the Mannor And if land is parcel of an Office it shall pass by the Grant of the office Much more he said tending to the effect to make the Lease good and so the Plaintiff shall recover Brook Chief Justice to the contrary Estate in lands includes land it self land is a generall word and contains Grantor and reversion particular words containing a Decree where one estate onely intent shall be inclined and ruled by the Law and not otherwise and intent nevertheless in certainty of words as 9. H. 6.35 Renuntiavit communium and not to whom void before fol. 122. 13. E. 3. Husband and Wife Tenants for life grant reversion of the Land that he holdeth by Homage Fealty and Castle gard the Lord grants all Services Castle gard passeth not because he granted not the Castle But in Testaments the intent shall be onely observed and rule the Law because the Teastator had not time by presumption to ordain all things according to the Law In conclusion he agreed that Judgement should be given for the Plaintiff Hill against Grange A Man maketh a Lease for years of a Messuage and an hundred acres of land appertaining to it 3. Mar in Common Pleas in Trespass c. by Deed indented the 6. of August rendring rent yearly payable at our Lady day and Michaelmas or 10 days after with clause of re-entry and after Grants the reversion and the Grantee the last instant of the 10. day after Michaelmas demands the rent and enters for not payment and it was adjudged that the entry was good for these reasons 1. Land may not appertain to a Messuage because both are things corporate simply otherwise of Advowsons waies c. which are things incorporate but things Corporate or Incorporate may pertain or be parcel of a thing compounded as a Mannor Castle Knights Fees Honors Forrests Monasterie Rectorie fol. 170. a. But here the land passes as appurtenant but by the intent and phrase of the parties as they have said usually occupied or let c. 2. The rent shall be paid at the first Feast of M. for otherwise it cannot be annual notwithstanding the other feast be first named 10. E. 3. the Abbot of Osneys case 3. The demand of the rent the last instant is good 4. That the Gantee of a Common person is an Assignee to have benefit of a Condition or Covenant fol. 173. a. and shall not be intended of the Pattentee of the King 5. That the Pattentee of the Heir and Successors of E. 6. shall take benefit of the Condition by equity of the said Stat. and not by the words Things of distinct and several natures the one is not parcel of or appendant to the other as 8. H. 7.1 by Keeble a Warren cannot be pertaining to a Leet nor a Leet to a Hundred nor one Office to another nor land to other land to a thing Compounded they may as a Mannor Knights Fee Honor Monastery Castle and a Village or to words general as are Oxgang a yard land a hide of land which contains land meadow pasture wood c. Messuage is a single word consisting of a thing special and not Compound nor a general word for that 27. H. 6.2 Land not parcel or appendant to a house and by demand of a Messuage in precipe land shall not be recovered and therefore pass not by the Grant of a House by the Serjeants on the part of the Plaintiff 23. H. 8. and 31 H. 3. by Feoffment of a Messuage with the appurtenances Land passes not a Mannor and things made appertaining to it are made by usage and continuance So 2. H. 7.28 land belonging to a Forrest and Warden of the Fleet and the house of the Master of the Rolls and divers farms to the Guardians of the Castle of Colchester and one Office to another as the custos brevium giveth one of the Offices of prothonatories and use and continuance is cause of it A man Leases a Messuage and land rendring rent be ought to demand the rent at the Messuage because most worthy Perk. 166. Meadow appertains to land 3. E. 3. by the Serjeants on the part of the Defendant Norwood against Read Action upon the case upon assumpsit made by the Testator 5. Mar â—…n K. Bench. lieth against the Executors adjudged For that the Testator could not gage his Law otherwise it is where he might gage his Law for the ignorance that the Law imputes of it to Executors and therefore there they ought to Demur but if they plead in Bar which is found against them they have lost the benefit of the Law and take Conusance of it whereof otherwise their ignorance shall excuse them 39. H. 6.19 12. H. 8.11 27. H. 8.23 Woodward against the Lord Darcie IF the Debtor make the Debtee his Executor and leaves him assets to satisfie the debt 5. Mar. Reso by the Judges of both Courts and dies the Debtee may pay himself by way of retainer by the Court 12. H. 4 21. according And in such case the Action is not utterly exstinct by the Administration for that the Law intends that he is satisfied by retainer before and so a thing in Action altered to a thing in possession by Act in Law for satisfaction of the party which hath no other remedy but if he hath not sufficient assets for to satisfie the debt the administration there extinguishes not the Action because that he cannot retain for parcel and have his Action against the Heir for the residue but ought to do the one for the other at his peril Wrotesly against Adams A Lease for 80. years of a Farm Tr i El. in Com. Pleas. Ej. firme the Lessor granted the Reversion of the Farm to a stranger to have and to hold the Farm for 60. years after the
end and expiration of the first Term of years the Lessor maketh a Lease for life to the first Lessee for years during the first Term and the second Lessee Enters and upon an Ouster bringeth Ejectione firme and by the Court it well lyeth 1. By the Law by a Grant of the reversion of the Farm the Farm and all the Demeasnes of it pass because it is nomen collectivum and certain in its self and so it was adjudged in the case of Bridges That by the Demise of the Farm the reversion and rent incident to it passeth 2. That the word Reversion shall be intended land reverting in the premisses and the habendum and not the estate in reverter which hath his continuance but in respect of the Term and during it it is a Grant of the reversion habendum the farm or land or reversion after the particular estate ended are all one 3. That the second Lease for years commencing by any determination of the first Lease whether it be in Law or in Deed and the expiration refers to the Term and not to the years Term is an estate in or for years and is finished when the estate is finished and this may finish when the years remain If a man marry with a woman Termor and the woman dies her husband shall have the Term for notwithstanding that the marriage hath not divested this out of the woman during coverture yet by her death this is given to the husband by Act in Law because it is a thing in possession and not in Action The Law is the Common use in Letters Pleas and Judgements and the Common Law is but common use by Anthony Brown fol. 195. Stradling against Morgan EXceptions alleadged in arrest of Judgement 2 El. Exchequer debt upon not guilty pleaded by the Defendant and found against him 1. The Plantiff hath shewed in his Declaration That the Defendant was then receiver c. and saith not That the Mannors were the Queens then and therefore shall be intended more strong against him then it should be to a common person and by consequence the Defendant is Baily to a common person by the Court. 2. That no receiver or Baily accomptant of a common person shall be within the Statute of 7. E. 6. c. 1 but onely of the Queen by the Court. 3. That the Action was not maintainable and the matter well alleadged lieth in the Queens Courts at Westminster notwithstanding the Statute of 34. and 35. H. 8. for Wales for that they are in the Affirmative and not in the Negative 4. That by this Statute an Action of debt by original Writ lieth for the forfeiture in the Exchequer howbeit that the party hath not cause of priviledge there 5. The Plaintiff ought to make mention of the Statute of 38. H. 8. and 7. E. 6. in his count for that the one is founded upon the other 6. He ought to shew expresly in his Count That the Queen was seized and made him her Bedel 7. Jeofails remedies not mispleadings in counts adjudged in Moon and Cliffords case In Debt the Plaintiff counts That whereas he was Bedel and Collector of certain Mannors by vertue of Letters Pattents of H. 8. and had a Fee for it the Defendant being Receiver of the said Mannor in 3. and 4. P. and M. took extortion for the payment of his Fee viz. 4. d. for every pound against the form of the Statute of 7. E. 6. the Defendant pleads not guilty and found against him And yet judgement given against the Plaintiff because the Count was incertain to whom he was Receiver and shall be intended against him then done to a Common person and a Receiver of a Common person is not within 7. E. 6. yet within the words for the intent of the makers shall be observed in the exposition of Statutes and so acts general in words have been expounded to be but particular where the benefit hath been particular As the King shall not have Wardship of lands which discends to the youngest Son but of that which discends to the heir general 12. E. 4. Stamford fol. 8. yet the Tenant dyed seized of others in Fee because the Statute of Praerogativa regis cap. 2. intends where the land is holden of the King and a Common person discended to the same Heir where one is Heir to the Tenant And Praerogativa Regis cap. 3. intends not that Soccage in capite shall give to the King primer seisen of lands holden of a Common person yet the words are general before fol. 109. Stamford Prerogative fol. 13. So Marlebr cap. 4. intends where Signiory and Tenancie are in the same County and therefore the Lord may bring a Distress taken in one County to a Mannor in another County of which the land is holden 1. H. 6.3 30. E. 3.6 before fol. 18. So Glouc. cap. 1. giveth Damages to the Disseisee against him which is found Tenant after the Disseisor for that he is Tenant by his own agreement and therefore the Disseisee shall not recover Damages against him which agrees not to a Feoffment made to him and others by the Disseisor yet he is Tenant but not Tenant by his agreement Litl Remitter fol 153. so long 5. E. 4. fol. 142. if he hath view in a precipe and afterwards abates the Writ for false Latine or for some other cause apparent he shall again have another Writ because there the Court might have abated this without motion For W. 2. cap. 49. although general intends where the Tenant abates the Writ by exception not apparent by 25. E. 3. cap. 16. by non-tenure of parcel no Writ abateable but for the quantity intends if the thing demanded be several as Acres but all the Writ shall abate where the thing demanded is entire as a Mannor before fol. 109. and the intent of the Statute never was contrary to the Text. By W. 2. cap. 25. if one fail of a Record he shall be a Disseisor yet a woman Covert shall not be 11. H. 4.50 nor infant because excepted by the intent yee in words hath included all So extenders shall not pay presently according to the words of Acton Burnel which ought to answer presently c. but shall be debtors presently with the duty and chargeable with the payment and daies payable of the rent or Revenues receiveable So by Exposition it seems against the Text of the Statute and is not because the intent of the makers guides them to it Of the part of the Defendant it was argued That the Action shall be sued there in Wales where the receipt is alleadged although that Wales is united to England by 27. H. 8. because by the same Statute Wales is divided into 12. Counties and by 34. and 35. H. 8. four Justices are appointed for wales viz. one for every three Counties and hold plea of all things within their circuit and one seal appointed for every circuit and all Actions suable there by the words of
is not lawfull but that he shall be barred by the Fine with Proclamations and the five years notwithstanding his Infancy for that the five years are once attached in his Ancestor and then they ought to incur for the pursuit of a Claim within five years is a Condition in Law which shall bind an Infant Those which argued with Stowell for the better intelligence of the Statute of 4. H. 7. ca 24. which gives five years to every stranger and of the reason of making it thought the Fines and their force at the Common Law and the incidents thereof which consists in three points 1. The nature of the Fine and the puissance of it 2. The preservation of the antient right by Claim 3. What persons may make the Claims 1. Fines are as antient as any Court of Record and at the Common Law they bind all strangers but those which have defect which Enters not or Claim within a year by 17. E. 1. So Non-claim after the year and day was peremptory upon a Fine or Recovery in a Writ of Right Executory and not Executed as is a Fine sur Conusans de droit and Render 7. E. 3.335 Because transmutation of Possession gave occasion to a stranger to take notice and to bring his Action or enter within the year and a day after Recovery in Right tryed by Battail or great Assise barred a stranger if he had not defect as Nonage was for the great notice of it because publike and more notorious then in other Actions And a Proclamation shall be made before Judgement upon a Recovery in right by default for to give notice of it And from thence use is derived to make Proclamation in formedon as it is in 7. H 4.19 upon the confessing of the Action Quaere by what Law and so Fines after Recovery in a Writ of Right was of the greatest force 2. But the avoyding of a Fine by one defeats it against all although their Right was bound before by their Nonclaim which sets at large all other Rights above them although they make not claim within the year and day 16. E. 2. As if the Lord defeats a Fine at the Common Law by deceit he restoreth the right to him which Levies the Fine And if the state which passes by the Fine be defeated the right Paramount is restored although it was barred before by Nonclaim As the Feoffee upon condition if an Abator levies a Fine one year passeth the Heir is barred by Nonclaim the Abator enters upon the condition broken the Heir now shall have Mort. d' Auncestor against him and after the Statute of 4. H. 7. an Action brought within fives years shall defeat the Fine against himself and all others having right Paramount although he hath not Judgement and Execution until seven years after Proclamation Claim is defined by Dyer to be a Challenge of the Ownership or Property that he hath not in Possession but is detained from him by wrong There are four Claims for defeating of Fines whereof two are by Record viz. Action Reall and Entry of the Claim at the foot of the Fine two by Acts in the Countrey viz. by Actuall Entry and by Claim and so notwithstanding the Puissance of Fines at the Common Law the Law hath provided those Claims for to preserve the Ancient right 3. Those which are strangers to the Fine and have present right ought to make Claim and shall avail all in Remainder or Reversion their Non-claim binds all in Remainder and Reversion because all of them have but one year by the common Law after the Fine levied And such mischief was a great cause why the Statute of 34. E. 3. ca. 16. which out Nonclaims was made But before this time W. 2. ca. 1. 13. E. 1. hath provided for the Donor and Donee that Nonclaim shall not bind them as it did before 13. E. 1. as it is like But an Infant was not bound at a time certain to make Claim by the Common Law It is proved by Implication of the Statute of W. 2. ca. 1. and 18. E. 1. de modo levandi fines observe in their Exposition because he hath not discretion to consider of his right nor to conceive what Action he shall bring nor when or how to Enter or Claim or to do Acts which require intelligence and in the same degree are Non-sane a man in prison and beyond Sea But a woman Covert was bound to make Claim by the Common Law because she is not mentioned in any of the Acts and hath a Husband which may make Claim for her And therefore Infants and such are at large always and bound to no time for to make their Claim by the Common-Law And if the Father Disseisee dyeth within a year and day after the Fine Levied before the Statute of Nonclaim his Heir within age he need not make Claim because he is not bound where the right discends to him more then he is when he hath a present right when the Fine was levied nor Infant in Remainder or Reversion is not bound by the Nonclaim of the particular Tenant And so howbeit that Fines at the Common Law were of so great force yet the former right was considered and time given for to preserve it and Infants were exempt out for this time And after when Nonclaim was repealed and outed in Fines and to make their Claims and because the Law was unreasonable that those in Remainder or Reversion should be bound by Nonclaim of particular Tenants and the Law of Nonclaim being outed in process of time Fines became too feeble and were in effect but Feoffments of Record whereby the security of Inheritance was taken away which was cause of great Contention between Subjects and therefore the Statute of 4. H. 7. intending to reform three things First to magnifie Fines againe Secondly to preserve the Ancient Right if it be pursued within a certain time Thirdly of not binding of persons of defect nor feme Coverts unless they are also parties to the Fines but favoured those which had defects untill their impediment removed and then gave them time sufficient to pursue their right That which is excepted out of the Act is out of the provision of the Act and there is no Ordinance for it but is so apparantly exempted out of the Act as if no Act had ever been made As a Feoffment of a Mannor except an Acre or of all Lands in Dale except White Acre is voyd for those Acres as if no Feoffment had been made but a saving goes to them touched and not exexmpt The word having in the Statute of Fines 4. H. 7. shall be expounded of them which have right at the time of the Fine Levied and Proclamations made and also of the using of the Action or Claim c. And not only at the time of the Action or Entry The exception goes not but to those before bound The ampleness of the Exception is measured by the ampleness of the