Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	bench_n	error_n	writ_n	1,901	5	9.4640	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A80048	Judges judged out of their own mouthes or the question resolved by Magna charta, &c. Who have been Englands enemies, kings seducers, and peoples destroyers, from Hen. 3. to Hen. 8. and before and since. Stated by Sr. Edvvard Coke, Knt. late L. Chief Justice of England. Expostulated, and put to the vote of the people, by J. Jones, Gent. Whereunto is added eight observable points of law, executable by justices of peace.	Jones, J., Gent.; Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; England. Magna Charta.	1650 (1650)	Wing C4938; Thomason E1414_1; ESTC R13507	46,191	120

the foresaid Iustices as far forth as appertaineth unto their Offices And besides these things granted upon the Articles of the Charters aforesaid The King of his special Grace for redress of the grievances that the people hath sustained by reason of his Wars and for the amendment of their Estate to the intern that they may be the more ready to do him service and the more willing to assist and aid him in time of need hath granted certain Articles the which he supposeth shall not onely be observed of his leige people but also shall be as much profitable or more than of the Articles heretofore granted One of the causes for the making this Act L. Coke f. 537 538 539. was saith the Lord Coke as in the Preamble is suggested that there was no certain punishment in many points established by the said Charters against the violators of the same which also by this Act saith he is remedied And the word People here saith he doth include all the Kings Subjects c. And again the word Pain ne fuit estable some read saith he Pain ne fuit execute and that is true in effect but the Original is Pain ne fuit estable that is no pain was set down certain And saith he fol. 539. This Act had but the force of a Charter until confirmed by this Parliament the 34th Ed. 1. And that these Charters should be read four times in the year in full County here is an order taken for the publishing And Ou remedie ne fuit avant c. is to be construed saith he where no Action was given by the Kings Writ to be pursued at Common Law c. Again here saith he for the better Execution of those glorious two Lights Magna Charta and Charta Forestae a new Court and new Justices were appointed c. Again saith he these clauses against the Kings Servants out of their places as well as others And to hear the Plaints without delay day by day and to determine them without admitting such delaies as be at Common Law was the first ground of the raising of the Justices called Trail Baston and their Courts so called in respect of their precipitate proceedings from day to day without such convenient leisure and time as Common Law allowed c. they in the end had such Authoritie as Justices in Eyer but albeit they had their Authoritie by Act of Parliament yet if they erred in judgement a Writ of Error did lie by the general Rule of the Common Law to reverse the Judgement in the kings-Kings-Bench which being once resolved and known and their Jurisdiction fettered with so many limitations their Authoritie by little and little vanish●d Expost and Quer. Was there any certain Pain established by this Statute against the violators of Magna Charta other than by Commission in Eyer that the Justices might determine and punish the Offendors by Imprisonments Fines or Amerciaments according to the Trespass Ought not the Justices of the Kings-Bench to have so punished all such as were Indicted before Sheriffs or Justices in Eyer who had power to inquire and certifie them of all such Offendors and Offences against Magna Charta by the Statute of Marlebridge 51. Hen. 3d Doth not the Lord Coke say elsewhere That all Statutes ought to be construed so as that there should be no failer of Justice should not the Justices of the Kings-Bench have construed Magna Charta so Doth not the 14th chap. of Mag. Charta expresly direct That all offendors ought to be Amercied by their equals according to the quantitie of the Trespass Doth the Lord Coke speak truth when he saith this Statute gave any man Remedie for the certaintie of the punishment other than Magna Charta did before Was it not made more uncertain by referring it to the Justices in Eyers discretion whether Amerciaments Fyne or Imprisonment Doth he not confess plainly when he saith It is true in effect that the Pain was not Executed as some read instead of the Pain was not Established That it was the fault of the Justices of the Kings-Bench in not Executing the Pain of Amercying c. as they might and ought to have done was the cause of Impowering the Justices in Eyer who were but Enquirers before now to determine and punish such Offendors and Offences as they did forbear viz. The Kings Servants with whom by this time they of the Kings-Bench tampered for their Offices And was it not for the same cause the people were Declared to be choosers of Justices in Eyer And doth not the Lord Coke shew a great spight between himself and his brethren whom he would have to be ancient and the Justices in Eyer whom he calleth a new Court and new Justices And shew his Memory to be weak as his Envy was strong when he is forced to give himself the Lye either here or in his Exposition of the Stat. of Marlebridge where he saith They were then Justices and a court though but for Inquirie And upon the 23th Chap. of Magna Charta he saith they used before that time to give charge to all Juries concerning Wears c. Doth not the Lord Coke say fol. 235. That Bracton wrote before the making West 1. which was 3. Ed. 1 And doth not Bracton lib. 3. cap. 11 12 and 13. say Justices in Eyer were before his time Doth not Camden in his Britannia pag. 104. say They were Instituted by King Hen. 2 Doth not Hoveden in his Annais part poster fol. 113. b. confirm the same And add that K. Hen. 2. divided the Realm in six parts setled thre● Justices in Eyer to every part whose names he relateth And doth not the Mirror of Justice lib. 3o. Tit. 1o. Justice in Eyer declare their power at large And as for their Election by the people doth he not say fol. 538. That Magna charta c. containeth the substance of all that is contained in these Articles And doth he not say in his Preamble That Magna Charta is an Act declarative of the ancient Laws and Customs of England before it and no introductive of any new And fol. 558. That of ancient time before the making of this Act all such Officers or Ministers as were instituted either for Preservation of the Peace of the County or for execution of Justice because it concerned all the Subjects of that County and they had a great interest in the due and just exercise of their places were by force of the Kings Writs in every several County chosen in full and open County by the Free-holders of the same County Again saith he So it was then and yet is of Coroners and so it was then and yet is of Knights of the Shire for Parliaments and of the Verdors of a Forest and likewise it was of ancient time of the Sheriff of the County and restored by this Act but this is altered by divers Acts of Parliament Now were not Justices in Eyer therefore

Eyre still And why not Writs Gratis sent to the Sheriff of every Countie to enquire of offences and offendors against the great Charter And doth not this Statute prove that Sheriffs ought to have such Writs and to make such enquiries And that the King referred himself as well as others to the judgements as well of Justices in Eyre as of the Justices of the Bench and that he would have his Writs granted as well against him as others and that Gratis doth it not futther prove that Kings accounted the Justices in Eyre his Justices and their Court his Court as well as the Kings-Bench how therefore doth the Lord Coke hereafter call them new Justices and their Court new Court But more of that in its place Now having done with so much of Mag. Charta as I promised and with the 5 Chapter of the Statute of Marlebridge and the 8 of the Statute of Glocester Here ensueth the Confirmation of the great Charter made at London 10 Octob. Anno 25. Ed. 1. three years before that which is Printed before it because that containeth all the Charter in 38. chapters at large and this but 7. In the First of which it confirmeth both Charters and every Article thereof both made 9º H. 3. in general words as followeth viz. Edward by the grace of God Cap. 1. Charters King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Guyen To all those that these present Letters shall hear or see Greeting Know ye that We to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and to the profit of Our Realm have granted for Vs and Our Heirs That the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of Forrests which were made by the Commonalty of the Realm in the time of King Henry Our Father shall be kept in every point without breach And We will that the same Charter shall be sent under Our Seal aswel to Our Justices of the Forrest as to others And to all Sheriffs of Shiers and to all Our other Officers and to all Our Cities throughout the Realm together with Our Whits in the which shall be contained that they cause the foresaid Charters to be published And to Declare to the People that We have confirmed them in all points And that Our Iustices Sheriffs Maiors and other Ministers which under Vs have the Laws of Our Land to guid shall allow the same Charters pleaded before them in Iudgement in all their points That is to wit The Great Charter as the Common Law And the Charter of the Forrest for the Wealth of Our Realm The Title of this Statute saith the Lord Coke is Confirmationes Chartarum de Libertatibus Angliae Forrestae L. C. upon Cons C. f. 526. viz. The Confirmations of the Charters of the Liberties of England and of the Forrest And true it is saith he that hereby the said Charters are expresly confirmed but they are also excellently interpreted which is a Confirmation in Law for here is nothing Enacted but is included within Magna Charta And by the Commonalty saith he is to be understood by the consent of all the Realm by Authority of Parliament and many times by the Commonalty of England is signified an Act of Parliament c. before Printing and before the Reign of King Hen. the 7th Statutes were Ingrossed in Parchment and by the Kings Writ Proclaimed by the Sheriff of every Countie this was the ancient Law of England that the Kings Commandments issued and were published in form of Writs as then it was An excellent course and worthie to be restored c. This Clause saith he is worthie to be written in letters of gold viz. That our Justices Sheriffs Majors and other Ministers which under us have the Laws of the Land to guid them shall allow the said Charters in all points which shall come before them in Judgement And here it is to be observed That the Laws are the Judges Guides or Leaders according to that old Rule Lex est Exercitus Judicum viz. The Law is the Judges Armie Tutissimus Doctor viz. The safest Teacher or Lex est optimus Iudicis Synagogus viz. Their best Synagoug And Lex est tutissimus cassis viz. Their safest Fortress There is an old legal word saith he called Guidagium viz. Guidage which signifieth an Office of guiding Travelors through dangerous and unknown ways Here it appeareth that the Laws of the Realm hath this Office to guid the Iudges in all causes that come before them in the ways of right Justice who never yet misguided any man that certainlie knew them and truly followed them The sence of the words That the great Charter is to be holden for the Common Law is that it is a Common Law to all in amendment of the Realm that is of great mischiefs and inconveniencies which oppressed the whole Realm before the making thereof Expost and Quer. Doth nor the Lord Coke by all this his expression commend this Statute very highly Why did he not in his duty cause it to be observed in his time And had not Iustices of the Forrest and other Iustices Sheriffs Majors and other Ministers of his time had they received the Great Charter with the Kings Writs power thereby as well as he to cause the said Charter to be published to the People and that the King had confirmed it in all points Why did he by neglecting his duty to send the said Charter and Writs unto them accordingly make them fail of their duties Doth not the Lord Coke confess by this clause Worthie as he saith to be written in letters of gold That Sheriffs Majors and other Ministers as well as Justices and other Justices as well as those at Westminster have or ought to have the Law of England to be their guid and ought to allow Magna Charta in all points which in any Plea shall be before them Why then do the Iustices at Westminster by their Habeas corpus and other Writs as aforesaid disturb and prevent all Sheriffs Majors c. to exercise their Offices before Judgment or after without proof of Injustice or manifest Errors committed by them in their Iudgements Why do not the Iustices at Wistminster when they have Persons and Causes brought before them by virtue of their Writs allow Mag. Car. to be Pleaded before themselves since they will suffer no others to hear it How can it be true when they do not that the Law is their guid Do not they assume the sole Guiding Learning Interpreting Exercising and Over ruling of the Law to themselves when they suffer no other Iustices or Ministers of the King but themselves to have any Judgement therein as aforesaid Why do they bely the Law so much as to call it their Guid their Teacher their Army their Synagogue their Fortress when it is manifest That their Attorneys their Sollicitors their Catch-polls and their Goalers are their Guids Teachers Supernumerous Armies and Invincible Fortresses as they trust but may be deceived

all whose ways are to Injustice as aforesaid How can that Law be called Common to all which They and these their Creatures Monopolize Ingross and Appropriate all to themselves as aforesaid And We will C. 2. Judgements That if any Indgement be given from henceforth contrary to the points of the Charters aforesaid by the Iustices or by any other Our Ministers that hold Plea before them against the points of the Charters it shall be undone and holden for nought Whatsoever Judgement is given against this Statute of Magna Charta L. Coke upon Con. C. f. 527. c. is made void by this Act and may be reversed by a Writ of Error because the Judgement is given against the Law for this Act saith Soir de fair pur nienttenus viz. as the Stat. Englisheth it self It shall be undone and holden for nought Expost and Quer. If so Why should not all Iudgements appearing as aforesaid to be contrary to Mag. Charta which are given for Arrests and Imprisonment of mens Bodies for Debt be undone and held for nought Why did Mr. Garland lately trouble the most High Court of Parliament whereof by so doing he shewed himself an unworthy Member with a ridiculous useless Act of his drawing for the Enlarging poor Prisoners for Debt Why did not he if he did ever read this place of the Lord 〈◊〉 mind the Parliament to command the Judges who seem if they have read it to have forgot it to reverse their Erroneous judgements against Debtors so far as they extend to their Imprisonment and to send their Liberate to all their Goalers to set open all their Goal dores and let forth so many of the Prisoners for Debt as they have left alive The poor because they have no Estate whereof to pay the rich because they have Estates sufficient for all or part against which Estates so much of their judgements may stand as concerneth that and not their Bodies and Executions may be taken thereupon by Elegit or Fieri facias according to the Statute of Westminster the 2. cap. 18th agreeable to Magna Charta and the Parliament not to be troubled except to Impower the Iudges by an Order to rectifie their judgements according to that Law which is in force and so forgo their Errors and Repealed Statute of the 25th of Ed. 3d c. 17th which ought to be no Guid Leader or Teacher to learned and grave Judges that can never be misguided by the right law if as the Lord C. saith they certainly know it and be pleased truly to follow it And by this course as well the Creditors of the rich Debtors as the poor Prisoners for Debt that have been wronged by the Judges Erronious judgements and proceedings against Mag. Charta may be partly redressed and so rest satisfied until the Parliament be pleased to right them further as shall appear hereafter they may So likewise may that Prisoner which is Imprisoned again after his inlargement by Garlands Act be Enlarged again by the same Judge that Committed him without troubling the Parliament or People with any such Appeal as is lately divulged or suffering the Apprentices Out-Cry to run so far That now it will never be stopped till the Thieves be taken And that all Arch Bishops Cap. 4. Excom c. and Bishops shall pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication against all those that by word deed or counsel do contrary to the said Charters or that in any point break or undo them And that the said Curse be twice a year Denounced and Published by the Prelates aforesaid And if the same Prelates or any of them be remiss in the Denunciation of the said Sentences the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury and York for the time being shall Compel and Distrain them to the Execution of their Duties in Form afore-said This Excommunication the Prelates could not pronounce without Warrant by Authoritie of Parliament L. C. upon Confir Cart. f. 527. because it concerned Temporal causes Expost and Quer. Was not the Authority of this Parliament sufficient Warrant for Prelates to pronounce Excommunication according to the Tenor and limitation of this Act Doth not the Lord Coke say before That this Act is not onely an Express Confirmation of Magna Charta but also a Confirmation of it in Law Doth he not say before that That Magna Charta should live for ever and in all Successions of Ages for evermore Is not the substance of the Excommunication given by this Act to the Prelates to pronounce Had the Prelates any more to do therein but to pronounce an Excommunication What meaneth Ipso Facto in the Act but to let all future Ages understand That the breach of Mag. Cha. which is a Declaration of the Fundamental Laws of England is such an Offence as deserveth an everlasting Curse inflicted by the Law it self upon the Breakers for ever Which Curse receiveth no more strength from the Pronouncer than a Sentence of Death from a Iudge who doth but tell a Fellon whom the Law condemneth what shall be the manner of his Death If any Excommunication was ever pronounced by virtue of this Act as there were two in two several Kings Reigns were not those Excommunications in force and so to continue as long as Magna Charta it self the Prelates and their Successours neglect of their Duties by discontinuing such Denunciations twice yearly afterwards notwithstanding If so Are not those Excommunications still in force except Absolutions be produced granted and given by equal Authority to that whereby those Excommunications were Denounced If so Are not Excommunications until Absolutions of the same accompt and validity in Law as Out-lawries until they be reversed If so Are not all the Lands Goods and Chattels of all Excommunicats now the States as formerly they were the Kings and so Seizable Sequestrable and Convertible to that use until Absolution And ought not satisfaction precede Absolution Ought not that satisfaction extend to every particular man that hath been wrong'd in this case which as the L. C. saith is a Temporal case and so called in respect of the interest of all men called by the Clergy Temporal for distinction from themselves that would be called Spiritual And so as I believe not to be commuted by a Prelatical Sentence to a trivial Pennance nor pardoned by Parliament without excepting every particular Interest And what Parliament can Pardon or Absolve Offendours against Magna Charta but by the Rules of Magna Charta without offending Magna Charta themselves and incurring the same Excommunication as they have incurred that would be Absolved If Excommunications be no Terrors to Atheistical Judges Justices c. who neither Believe nor fear Heaven Hell God Justice nor Laws though they cannot in nature and reason but know that such there are and are to be beleived feared and obeyed shall not Excommunications be sufficient Warrants for Christians English Christians in England being warranted not onely as the L. C. saith By

Justices in Eyre should Try him Why not such a Writ still Since odium which the Lord C. defineth to be hatred and atia malice and Prisoners for those causes are no scanter now than in former times And why not Justices in Eyre made since competent Judges by Commission without Writs to determine such matters which before they could but inquire of by Writs as the Lord C. saith elsewhere though he saith here to try them imployed for that service And now if it be Lawfull for a Judge of the Kings-Bench to determine a debt and to grant an Habeas Corpus for money to bring the Prisoner before him to put in Bail Why should he take money for the Writ and refuse sufficient Bail tendred after Oath made of their sufficiency without the plantiffs consent Nay after acceptation of the Bail Why refuse to File it No Free-man shall be taken Ca 2.9 No Free man c. or imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or Free Customs or be Outlawed or Exiled or any way otherwise destroyed nor we shall not pass upon him but by lawfull judgement of his Peers or by the Law of the Land we shall sell to no man we shall denie or deferre to no man either Iustice or Right Free-man extends to Villains both Sexes Lord Coke upon Mag. Chart. Fol. 46 c. c. Vpon this Chapter as out of a root many fruitfull branches of the Law of England have sprung It containeth nine several Branches First That no man be taken or imprisoned but by the Law of the Land viz. The Common-Law Statute-Law or Customs of England c. Secondly No man shall be disseised viz. put out of his Freehold that is Land Livelihood or Liberties or free Customs such as belong to him by his free Birth-right unless it be by the lawfull judgement and verdict of his equals or by the Law of the Land that is to speak it once for all by the Due course and proces of the Law Thirdly no man shall be Outlawed or put off the Law viz. Deprived of the benefit of it unless he be Outlawed by the Law of the Land Fourthly No man shall be exiled c. unless according to the Law of the Land Fifthly No man shall be destroyed c. unless by verdict or according to the Law of the Land Sixthly No man shall be condemned c. but by the judgement of his equals or according to the Law of the Land Seventhly We shall sell to no man Justice or right Eighthly We shall denie no man Justice or right And Ninthly We shall deferre no man Justice or Right c. First Expost and Quer. If no man ought to be taken or imprisoned but by the Law of the Land viz. the Common-Law Statute-Law and Customs of England is it not cleared by our Expostulations before upon the 11. Chapter that Debtors are taken and imprisoned in the Kings-Bench contrarie to the Common-Law of England declared by Mag. Chart. contrarie to the chief Statute of England which is Mag. Char. and which the Lord Coke saith should live as was accorded by King and people for ever And contrarie to the Custom of England declared by Mag. Charta and also by the Lord Coke not to extend to the imprisonment of any Debtours but onely the Kings And are not Debtors other than the Kings so imprisoned as well elsewhere as in the kings-Kings-Bench Secondly if no man shall be disseised viz. put out of his Freehold that is to say His Livelihood Liberties or Free-Customs such as belong to him by his Birth-right unless it be by the lawfull judgement and verdict of his equals or by the Law of the Land that is to say once for all by Due course and Proces of Law Are not Debtors disseised of their Livelihood Libertie and Freedom which belonged unto them as their Freehold by Birth right when they are imprisoned in London Westminster or elsewhere by Arrests and Actions for Debt whether due or not upon meer suggestions of Adversaries not so much to Judges as to Catch-pols without any judgement or verdict of their equals and without Due course or Proces of Law which should be Summons Attachment and Distringas before any Arrest as aforesaid Are they not taken in the Countrey from their Ploughs which are their Livelihood and their Countreys and their Freehold by Birth-right by vagant Bum-baylies and imprisoned there till they give bail to appear at Westminster and thence instead of being remanded home to their sweet Farm-houses large fields and industrious Agricultures are they not sent to stinking Goals close dungeons and idle Monk-cels whereby they are allowed little more ground to walk upon while they live than might serve them to lie under when they are dead Are not all the Corporations of England and their free-chosen Officers that should do them justice at home disseised of their Freeholds by Birth-right and Charters before and since Mag. Char. when they are prevented of the administration of justice in execution of their Offices to which they were sworn and heritable successively from their Ancestours by Custom long before Mag. Char. and since confirmed by the same and by Charters dated before and since by Certioraries Habeas Corpus c. before Judgement and pretence of Errors after and though never any proved or assigned yet the causes never remanded but detained at Westminster where the usual correction of pretended Errours is not by making any thing that is crooked straight but all that is straight crooked so that both Plantiffs and Defendants give their titles for lost in a mist commonly but he that hath the wrongfull possession and money holdeth it and he that hath the right and no money goes to his grave without it Are not all the People of England disseised of their Freehold Liberties Franchises and Free customs when they are deprived of that justice which they ought to have administred amongst them at home by virtue of the Kings Writs original for Enquiries and judicial for Determinations directed to Sheriffs of their own choise in their own Counties or Stewards of Hundreds and Court-Barons in their precincts where the Free-holders themselves are Judges themselves by ancient Common Laws and Customs of England before Mag. Char. and by it declared and confirmed unto them as aforesaid Can Writs of trespass executed for debt or Capiases grounded upon counterfeited Originals be construed by any Law to be due Proces of Law Thirdly Are men lawfully Outlawed upon Exigents for debt grounded upon a repealed Statute and are not all Debtors that are Outlawed so Outlawed Are men lawfully Outlawed that are Outlawed upon Exigents grounded upon Summonitus or Non est inventus counterfeitly returned by Attorneys who at the time of the return were no Sheriffs or competent officers and are not all or most Debtors and Trespassers that are Outlawed in London and Middlesex so Outlawed Are men lawfully Outlawed upon any Exigents that are Outlawed without the