attornment Co. ib. 94. 2. he shall not shew it sic de simlibus But when he that claimes the thing or any right or interest out of it or justifies in right of the Grantée there he ought to shew the first grant as the second Grantée of a rent charge shall shew the first grant and so shall his Bailife and the Grantée of a rent charge shall not plead the release of the Disseisée to the Disseisor without shewing it for albeit he claime not the land of which the release is made yet he that hath rent out of land hath also right in the land which by a release of all his right shall be extinct and therefore in such case he ought to produce the Déed And with this agrées the 20 H. 7. 6. 14 H. 8. 5. The Disseisée shall not plead a release to the Disseiser neither of right in the land nor of rent issuing out of the land without shewing it for where one claims the thing unto which the release is made or right or interest out of it the Law creates a privity in respect of his estate or right in the land viz. to this intent that he shall not have benefit of the Déed without shewing it Impeachment â—f wast is gone â—y altering the â—â—tate 116 If an estate of land be granted without impeachment of wast Co. l. 11. 83. b. 3. Lewis Bowles case that priviledge is individually annexed unto that estate 3 E. 3. 44. per Shard and Stone If one that hath a particular estate without impeachment of wast change his estate he loseth that advantage 5 H. 5. 9. a. If a man make a Lease for years without impeachment of wast and after he confirmes the land to him for his life he shall be afterwards chargeable for wast 28 H. 8. Dyer 10. b. If a Lease be made to one pur auter vie without impeachment of wast the remainder to him for terme of his own life here he is punishable of wast for the first is estate drowned and gone and so it is also of a Confirmation The heir at the Common Law shall have prohibition of wast against the Tenant in Dower but if the heir grant over the reversion his Grantée shall not have prohibition of wast For it appears in the Register fol. 72 that such an Assignee in an action of wast against Tenant in Dower shall recite the Statute of Glocester and therefore he shall not have prohibition of wast at the Common Law for then he should not recite the Statute Vide F. N. B. 55. 14 H. 4. 3. 5 H. 7. 17. b. suprà 1 4. â—ouchee c. â—y have a â—rit of Erâ—â— c. 117 If a man be vouched and enter into warranty and leaseth F. N. B. 21. c. he may have a Writ of Error and shall assigne the errors which hapned between the Demandant and the Tenant or between the Demandant and himselfe as Vouchee And so he in reversion that prays to be received for default of the Tenant for life or for his faint pleading if he be recovered and plead and lose he shall have a Writ of Error and shall assigne the error that hapned betwéen the Demandant and Tenant or betwéen the Demandant and himselfe that so prayed to be received So also if Tenant for life lose by default he in the reversion shall have a Writ of Error albeit he neither was received nor prayed to be received And he shall assigne for error any matter that hapned betwéen the Demandant and Tenant that so lost by default And all this is in respect of the privity and interest which the Vouchee and Reversioner had in the land so recovered by the Iudgement F. N. B. 21. l. m. n. 118 In a plea of land against the Tenant if the Tenant die Who may bring writs 〈◊〉 Error he that is heir to the Tenant for that land shall have a Writ of Error and not he that is heir at the Common Law as in Borough English if the Tenant lose the land by erronious Iudgement the youngest sonne shall have the Writ of Error and so shall he that is heire in special tail And this in respect of the special privity and interest which they have in the land And for the same reason it is that in case land be lost by erronious Iudgement the Tenant may have a Writ of Error and so also may the Vouchee have another Writ of Error upon one and the same Iudgement and so may the Tenant and the Tenant by receit and all at one time hanging Executors also or Administrators shall have a Writ of Error upon a Iudgement given against their Testator for debt or damages So likewise the heir shall have a Writ of Error to reverse an out-lawry of Felony pronounced against his father to restore him to the privity of bloud betwéen his father and him F.N.B. a. 22. b. The Successor of an Abbot Prior Parson or such like bodies politique shall have a Writ of Error upon a Iudgement given against their Predecessor of all things which touch the Succession or Corporation but if a man recover against a Parson Bishop or the like debt or damages by judgement or action personal their Executors shall have a Writ of Error upon such Iudgement and not their Successors because their Executors or Administrators have interest in such things and not the Corporation c. If a man sue execution erroniously against the recongnisor upon a recognisance the Feoffée of the recognisor shall have a Writ of Error c. F. N. B. 22. c. 119 In a praecipe quod reddat of land if the Tenant disclaime No writ of Eâ—ror upon diâ—claime whereby the Demandant recovers in that case the Tenant shall not have a Writ of Error against his own Disclaimer because by that plea he hath waved all the privity and interest that he had in the land but if the Tenant onely plead non-tenure and thereupon it is found against him so that the Demandant recovers in that case the Tenant shall have a writ of Error c. F.N.B. 98. q. r. 120 If a man lose land by default in a praecipe quod reddat and die Heir and â—â—cutor privies the heir shall have an action of deceit as well as the father and shall have restitution for he is privy in bloud So likewise if a man have execution by default upon a recognisance in a Scire facias sued against one and that Defendant die his Executors shall have a Writ of deceit and shall be restored for they are privies in right c. F.N.B. 108. a. 121 The Vouchée or Tenant by receit or he in the reversion Reversione shall have â—taint or Eâ—â— where he joyns to the Tenant for terme of life by aid prayer shall have an attaint if they lose by false verdict And if the Tenant for life lose by false verdict he in the
sometimes in the count and for want of certainty it shall abate as in 3 E. 4. A man retained in Husbandry brings an Action of debt against a Prioresse for his salary and declares that he was retained with his Predecessor and shewes not the person that retained him this count abated for the uncertainty for it might be that one who had not Warranty retained him for the Predecessor Sometimes the Count and Writ also may be generall without certainty as in Assizes but there the certainty ought to be shewed by the Replication sometimes the Writ Count and Replication may be uncertaine but then the certainty ought to appeare by the Verdict as in a Quare Impedit the value appeares not in the Count nor in the Replication but it will appeare by the Verdict for they shall assesse double damages or damages by halfe a yeare according to the value of the Church so in a Writ of Ward the Iury shall find whether the heire be marryed or not and shall assesse damages for it and yet in the Count or Replication no such matter appeares So likewise in a Detinue the value of the goods shall appeare by the Verdict c. so as certainty ought alwayes to appeare to the Court. Jeofaile 72. In debt upon an Obligation for performance of Covenants Dyer 31. 217. 28 H. 8. whereby the Defendant was bound to do and suffer to be done upon request all such things for the Plaintiffs assurance in certaine Lands as should be devised by councell the Defendant saith that he was not requested the Plaintiff replyes that his councell advised that the Defendant should seal a Release which was required to be done and that the Defendnat refused to this the Defendant rejoynes and saith that he did not refuse and that he was ready to do it And the Court said that this re-joynder was a full Jeofaile and therefore insufficient for the uncertainty for that he waved his bar viz. the request which he ought to have maintained as to have said Quod non fuit requisitus Abayance 73. When the right of Fee-simple is perpetually by Iudgment of Law in abeyance without any expectation to come in esse Co. Inst part 1. 343. a. 3. there he that hath the qualified fee and to many purposes is no more then a bare Tenant for life concurrentibus hijs quae in jure requiruntur may charge or alien it as in case of a Parson Vicar c. when the Patron and Ordinary joyne with him in the Charge or Grant for in this case at the common Law when all that had an Interest in the thing did joyne the Charge or Grant might have been thereby made certaine and infallible but where the Fee-simple is in Abeyance and albeit by possibility it may every houre come in esse yet it is altogether uncertaine when or whether ever or never that may happen In such case the Fee-simple cannot be charged untill it come in esse so as it may be certainly charged or aliened As if a Lease for life be made the Remainder to the right Heires of I.S. Here the Fee-simple cannot be charged or aliened before I.S. be dead in case I.S. dye living the Tenant for life Co. ibid 378. a. 3. but if the Tenant for life happen to dye before I.S. then is the Remainder vanished and gone because it cannot immediatly vest after the death of the Tenant for life Second deliverance 74. Vpon a second deliverance the Defendant being a Widow justifies by an estate for life if she so long continue a Widow Dyer 142 51 c. 3 4. P. M. and averreth not that she is the same woman to whom the estate was made nor that she is still a Widow for which uncertainty and others concerning the place where the Cattell were taken the Plaintiff had Iudgentent c. Inquisition 75. Inquisitio capta apud D. of Land in S. Dyer 208 19. 3 4. Eliz. without shewing in what County either D. or S. is was adjudged insufficient for the uncertainty because upon a Traverse it could not be tryed for want of the knowledge where the Venue should be taken Dyer 254. b. 1. 9 El. 76. In debt for rent arreare the Plaintiff counts Debt for rent arreare that his termor devised to the Defendant the terme and dyed and that the Defendant entred and was possessed and that for arreare of rent the Action accrued to this the Defendant demurs 1. because he hath not alleadged that the Devisor made Executors and that the Defendant entred with their agreement 2. For that he saith not vertute cujus legationis the Defendant was possest for which uncertainties the Count was adjudged insufficient for if the Defendant were in of any other estate or title then as Assignee of the Lessee an Action of debt lyeth not against him for want of privity Dyer 264. 39 9. Eliz. 77. A new Assignment was in one Acre New Assignment terrae sive prati in campo vocat N. the Defendant pleads not guilty but for the uncertainty whether Land or Meadow and also because there was no abuttalls the Iury were discharged Hob. 2. Axworths case 78. In an Action upon the case by Thomas against Axworth Slander the words were This is John Thomas his writing innuendo the Plaintiff and he innuendo c. hath forged this Warrant the Sheriffs Warrant at the Suit of M. Hog against the Defendant Innuendo And in this case it was held that the Innuendo would not support the Action the word Warrant alone being of an uncertaine sense and the matter of the Action shall not be enlarged or ascertained by the Innuendo as Pox innuendo the French Pox. Vide Hob. 6. Miles case 45. Harvies case Hob. 38. Dawtries case 79. Office An office was found by Commissioners after the death of William Dawtry whereupon a Melius Inquirendum went forth and recited but thus Cum per quandam Inquisitionem captam apud Chichester c. and doth not say that it was either by Commission or Writ or before whom and it was held void for the uncertainty and the office also that was taken upon the Melius for by the Melius it ought to appeare that the first office was by warrant c. Hob. 89. Rich and Shere 80. In an Ejectione firmae the Plaintiff counts of a Messuage c. Ejectioâ—e firma with Appurtenances called Dizard in Cornewall to hold for five years the Defendant pleads not guilty whereupon the Plaintiff had Iudgement And the Defendant assignes for Error that the Plaintiff had not shewed in what Towne Parish Hamlet or place the Messuage lay but in the generall County and thereupon the Iudgement was reversed in the Exchequer Chamber 13. Jac. for here was a tryall without a Visne Hob. 90. 81. Vide Hob. 90. Keere and Owen upon an Elegit Elegit Error for omitting the Entry
accession of the estate for life Co. l. 8. 142. b. 1. in Doctor Druries case 47 If a man hath judgement in a Quare Imepedit Quare Iâ—â—dit Errour and hath a Writ to the Bishop and the Bishop refuseth to admit his Clerk Here the Plaintiff upon this collateral matter of refusall may have a Writ of Quare non admisit but if the Defendant reverse the Iudgement by a Writ of Error and after the Plaintiff in the Quare Impedit brings his Quare non admisit the Defendant may plead no such record and so bar the Plaintiff of bringing that Writ Vide 26 E. 3. fol. 75. per Wilby and Hill In like manner Execution Errour Escape if A. be taken by the Sheriffe in execution at the suit of B. upon an erroneous Iudgement and after make an escape and after the judgement is reversed by a Writ of Error the action upon the escape is lost c. Ibid. the principall case 48 If the return of an Exigent be erroneous Exigent â—â—neous the Outlawry which is grounded thereupon is erroneous also because the Writ of Exigent is the warrant by which they proceed to the Outlawry Vide Proctors case 5 Eliz. Dyer 223. Ibid. 143. b. 2. 38 H. 6. 4. 12. 49 One that had cause of priviledge in Banco is arrested in London Priviledge Supersedeâ— and delivers a Supersedias notwithstanding which the Recorder gives judgement and he is taken in execution and is thereupon removed in Banco by a Corpus cum causa And here because after the Supersedeas delivered there was a Nullity in the proceeding and judgement the Court without Writ of Error awarded that he should be discharged of the Execution c. Ibid. 143. a. 1. 50 If two Iudgements are given Two judgements The first dâ—feated and the last depends meerly upon the first as upon his foundation there if the first fundamental judgement be reversed by Writ of Error or Attaint the last which appears in the Record to depend upon it shall be reversed also as in Assise and Redisseisin so of a judgement upon the original and another judgment in a Scire facias so also of a judgement against the Tenant and another against a Vouchee and the like c. Conusee of a Statute 51 The Conusee of a Statute Staple in a writ of Detinue of the same Statute upon garnishment recovers by erroneous Iudgement against the Garnisee and hath the Statute delivered unto him Ibid. 142. b. 7 H. 6. 4â— a. the Garnisée brings a writ of Error Garnishment and the Conusee sues execution upon the Statute and hath it Here albeit the Garnisee reverse the judgement yet inasmuch as the Statute was executed that execution shall not be avoided by the reversall of the judgement because the judgement was onely to have the Statute delivered Judgement Execution and the Execution upon the Statute is a thing executed not at all depending upon the judgement And yet in this case by the opinion of Coke Chiefe Iustice the Garnisee shall have remedy upon the reversal of the judgement by an Audita quaerela Audita Quaerela because the cause and ground of the Collateral Action is disproved and annulled by the reversall of the first judgement and the first Plaintiff restored to his first action upon which he may have his first and due remedie Executors have execution The Will annulled 52 Executors have judgement in account Ibid. 143. b. 4. per Coke chief Justice and for the arrerages have the Defendant in execution and afterwards the Testament was annulled because the Testator was an Idiot and the Record spirituall was removed into the Chancery by Writ and then sent into the Kings Bench where the Action was brought And hereupon the Defendant brought an Audita quaerela Audita Quaerela for that the Testament was disproved and it was resolved in the Exchequer Chamber an 35 H. 8. that the Audita quaerela would well lie A Melius Inquirend erroneous 53 It was found by Mandamus 2 Jac. that P. S. held the Mannor of O. in Soccage of Qu Co. l. 8. 168. a. Paris Slaughters case Eliz. as of her Mannor of N. In 7 Jac. a Melius Inquirendum was awarded reciting the former office to enquire whether the Mannor of O. at the time of the death of P. S. was holden of the King in Capite c. whereupon an office was found that at the time of the death of P. S. the said Mannor of O. was holden of Qu Eliz. by Knight service as of her Mannor of N. and that at the taking of the inquisition it was holden of the King c. In this case the Melius was repugnant in it selfe because it was impossible for the Iury to finde the Mannor holden of King James at the death of P. S. which was in the fourth year of Qu Eliz. for then it must needs be holden of the Queen King James being then King of Scotland c. Now therefore albeit the Iury by the Inquisition had rightly found the tenure of the Mannor and that their finding thereof in that respect was good and according to the truth of the case yet because it was not warranted by the Melius which was the ground of their Inquisition all was adjudged insufficient and void and a new Melius inquirendum was awarded An Idiot examined in Chancery 54 A man that is found an Idiot from his nativity by office Co. l. 9. 31. b. 4 in the case of the Abbot of Strata Mercella may come into the Chancery and pray to be examined or by his friends he may pray to be brought thither and if it be found upon examination that he is no Idiot the office thereof found and all the examination which was by force of the Writ or Commission are utterly void without any traverse monstrance de Droit or any other suit Assumpsit deâ—eaâ—â—d 55 An Executrix in consideration Co. lib. 9. 94. a. 4. Will. Banes case that the Plaintiff will forbeare till Michaelmas to sue for a debt due by the Testator to the Plaintiff upon lone promiseth to pay it at Michaelmas and in an Action upon the case brought against her upon that promise pleads non assumpsit here the consideration of forbearance is good because although it be no benefit to the promiser yet is it damage to the Plaintiff And yet in this case if in rei veritate the debt were not due debt Per Coke chief Justice or the Executrix had not assets at the time of the promise she may give that in evidence and shall be thereupon ayded for then in truth there was not any consideration upon which the assumpsit might be grounded because to forbeare a debt which was not due or wherewith she was not chargeable could be neither benefit to the Defendant nor damage to the Plaintiff Co. l. 9. 139. a. 3.
granted in the time of Quéen Eliz. Quaere whether or no the Extent was returned without warrant Errour 78 In debt the Iudgment was reversed Dyer 130. 58. 6 Eliz. because there was no warrant of Attorny entred and this albeit the Writ of Error was brought the same terme the record remaining still in the breasts of the Iustices and the Plaintiff had prayed entry thereof Note that both the first Action and the Writ of Errour were brought in Banco Regis Lease void 79 The Provost of Wels being Parson imparsonee of the Parsonage of Winsam leaseth the tithes for fifty years rendring rent Dyer 239. 40. 7 Eliz. which was also confirmed by the Deane and Chapter but not by the Patron and Ordinary the Provostship was by Parliament united to the Deanary cum primo vacare contigerit The Provost dies the Deane accepts the rent yet the lease is not affirmed by such acceptance for the Provosts lease was void by his death as it is of a Parson or Prebend It was otherwise of a Bishop Deane Abbot c. which were elective and before the Statute of 1 Eliz. not printed might make discontinuance but if the lease above had béen for life it had not been void before entry Also the acceptance above was to no purpose for the reversion was determined and the name of succession altered As if Tenant in Dower or other particular Tenant make a lease and die and he in reversion or remainder accept the rent this is no affirmation because the reversion is altered 80 Hob. 10 Doctor Leyfield against Tisdale 41 Things incident are adhaerent to their Superiours or Principals Deeds c. in whose custody to remain 1 A man seised of Lands in fee hath divers Charters Deeds Co. inst pars 1. 6. a. 2. The Lord Buckhursts case Co. l. 1. 1 2. and Evidences and maketh a feoffment in fee either without warranty or with warranty onely against him and his heirs In this case the Purchaser shall have all the Charters Deeds and Evidences as incident to the lands ratione terrae to the end he may the better defend the land himself having no warranty to recover in value for the evidences are as it were the sinews of the land and the Feoffor being not bound to warranty hath no use of them But if the Feoffor be bound to warranty so that he is bound to render in value then is the defence of the title at his peril and therefore the Feoffee in that case shall have no deeds that comprehend warranty whereof the Feoffor may take advantage Also he shall have such Charters as may serve him to deraign the warranty paramount Likewise he shall have all Deeds and Evidences which are material for the maintenance of the title of the land but other evidences which concern the possession and not the title of the land as Court Rolls c. the Feoffee shall have them as concomitantia incidentia to the possession Land on the part of the mother 2 If a man seised ol Lands as heire of the part of his Mother Co. Inst pars 1. 12. b. 4. maketh a feoffment in fee reserving a rent to him and to his heirs this rent shall go to the heirs of the part of the Father vide N.B. 40. 70. but if he had made a gift in falle or a lease for life reserving a rent the heire of the part of the Mother shall have the reversion and the rent also as incident thereunto shall passe with it but the heire of the part of the Mother shall not take advantage of a condition annexed to the same because it is not incident to the reversion nor can passe therewith The like for service 3 If a man had been seised of a Mannor Co. ibid. as heire on the part of his Mother and before the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum had made a feoffment in fee of parcell to hold of him by rent and service albeit they be newly created yet for that they are parcell of the Mannor they shall with the rest of the Mannor descend to the heirs of the part of the Mother quia multa transeunt cum universitate quae per se non transeunt Co. ibid. 4 If a man hath a Rent-seck of the part of his Mother The like for distresse and the Tenant of the land granteth a Distresse to him and his heires and the Grantee dieth the Distresse shall go with the rent to the heir of the part of the Mother as incident or appurtenant to the rent for now is the Rent-seck become a Rent-charge Co. ibid. 19. b. 3. 5 By the Statute of Westm 2. The land incident to the tenant in tail the land is as it were appropriated or incident to the Tenant in tail to the heirs of his body and therefore if an estate be made either before or since the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. to a man and the heirs of his body either to the use of another and his heirs or to the use of himselfe and his heirs this limitation of use is utterly void for before the said Statute of 27 H. 8. he could not have executed the estate to the use P. 14 Jac. in B. R. And so it was adjudged in an Ejectione firmae between Cooper Plaintiff and Franklin c. Defendant Co. ibid. 22. b. 3. 6 The possibility of having heirs to inherit is so inherent and incident to a man as long as he lives A remainder to a mans right heirs is a limitation to himselfe that it cannot by any act of his be severed from him during his life except when his blood is corrupt by attainder T. 23 Eliz. Fenwick and Mitfords case c. And therefore at this day since the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. If a man seised of lands in fee make a feoffment in fee and depart with his whole estate and limit the use to his daughter for life and after her decease to the use of his sonne in taile and after to the right heirs of the Feoffor In this case although he departed with the whole Fee-simple by the feoffment and limited no use to himselfe yet hath he a reversion for whensoever the Ancestor takes an estate for life and after a limitation is made to his right heirs the right heirs shall not be purchasers And here in this case when the limitation is to his right heirs and right heire he cannot have during his life for non est haeres viventis the Law doth create an use in him during his life untill the future use cometh in esse and consequently the right heirs cannot be purchasers And there is no diversity when the Law creates the estate for life and when the party And if the limitation had béen to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of another in taile and after to the use
of Lancaster was holden of the King in Capite but when they remained in one and the same person the ancient tenures of the Crown did sléep perpetuo somno because the King could not hold of himself F. N. B. 21. i. 24 In the Common Pleas upon Error in Processe Errour in 〈◊〉 not reversâ— in the same Court or in default of the Clerks the Iustices there may reverse their owne judgement so it be done the same terme without suing any Writ of Error And if it be deferred till another terme yet may it be reversed by the said Iudges upon a Writ of Error But if it be Error in Law which is the default of the Iustices themselves that Court cannot reverse such a judgment no not by a Writ of Error For that Error is to be redressed in another Court before other Iustices by Writ of Error because the Iustices of the Common Pleas are not competent Iudges of their owne error Conspiracy 25 A writ of Conspiracy cannot properly lye against one single person because one person cannot be said to conspire with himself F. N. B. 116. l. None can be a prisoner to himself 26 If the Warden of the Fléet who hath his office in fée Pl. Co. 37 a. 3. The Sheriffs of Londons case die seised his Son and Heire being then in prison and the office descends unto him being so in prison In this case the Law will adjudge him out of prison albeit the Fetters be upon his legs for that he cannot kéep himself in prison and therefore shall be adjudged at large No donor to himself Stat. 27 H. 8. 27 If A. seised of lands in fée before the Statute of uses made Anno Pl. Co. 59. a. 4. Wimbish and Talbois case 27 H. 8. had granted the same lands to Feoffees in trust to the use of himselfe and his wife in tail and afterwards the Statute is made Here by force of that Statute the possession being conveyed to the use the Feoffors are Donors and not A. For it seemeth improper and repugnant that A. should be Donor to himself Feoffees of lands charged with a recognisance 28 If the Conisor of a Recognizance according to the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 6. enfeoff the Conisee of parcel of the land Pl. Co. 72. b 3. Rosse Vens Sir Tho. Pope in Audita quaerela F. N. B. 104 n. 105. c. Vide Dyer 193. 30. 2 3 Eliz. and a stranger of another parcel and reserve parcel in his own hands Here the Conisee shall not have execution against the stranger For if one Feoffee of the Conisor where his land onely is put in execution may have an Audita quaerela against all the other Feoffees to make their lands also to be put in execution and to be contributary to the intire charge By the same reason if the Conisee himself be one of the Feoffees the lands in the hands of the other Feoffees shall not be chargeable with the execution for that the Conisee himself cannot be contributary with them for his part towards the satisfying of the charge because he cannot contribute to himself neither can he be contributary for a personal thing due to himself Neither yet shall the Charge be apportioned but all shall be extinct as against the other Feoffees Howbeit against the Conisor himself the Conisee shall have execution for the parcel still remaining in his hand c. Lands to be sold by Executors 29 At the Common Law Co. Inst pars 1. 113. a. 3. if lands had béen willed to be sold by Executors or had béen devised to Executors to be sold if any of them had refused the rest could not have sold them but now that is holpen by the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. viz. the first by the expresse words of that Statute and the other by the equity of the same Howbeit in neither of those cases when the one refuseth can the other make sale to him that so refuseth because he is party and privy to the last will and remaineth Executor still The younger â—rother chargeth the land â—f the elder 30 The younger brother disseiseth the elder Dyer 5. 1. 25 H. 8. who is barred in an Assise by a false oath the younger chargeth the land and dies without issue and the land descends to the elder brother In this case the elder brother is without remedy because there is none but himself against whom he may bring the attaint and therefore he shall still hold the land charged â—ythes 31 If the Parson of a Church purchase a Mannor within his Parish Dyer 43. 21. 30 H. 8. Here by this purchase and unity of possession the Mannor which was tytheable before is now made non decimabilis because he cannot pay tythes to himself â—itnesse 32 It was resolved in the Common Bench Co. Inst pars 1 6. b. 4. Pasch 10 Jac. that a wife cannot be produced as a witnesse either against or for her husband because they are one person in Law Duae animae in carne una and he cannot be a witnesse to or for himself in his own cause Dyer 220. 14. 5 Eliz. 33 A recognizance was acknowledged to Sir Nicholas Bacon and two others before Sir Nicholas himself being then Lord Kéeper Recognisance and it was adjudged void as to him and good for the others Dyer 279. 10 11 Eliz. 34 The Citizens of Yorke were incorporate by R. 2. Yorke Citie by the name of Major Sheriffs and Citizens and claim to be so before by prescription and to have a custom to seise goods forraign bought forraign sold Now in a suit against them for seising such goods the Venire facias issued to the Sheriffe of the County De vicinetu Castri Eborum because it was next adjacent to the Citie for it was not thought fit to direct it to the Sheriffs or Coroners of Yorke because they were Citizens and parties Dyer 304. 54. 14 Eliz. 35 The next avoydance is granted to thrée Quare Impedit Habendum iis uni eorum conjunctim divisim the first presents the third who is admitted instituted and inducted and adjudged good Howbeit if the Bishop had refused to admit him alone his Quare Impedit peradventure would have failed he having a joynt Interest in the avoydance and the Habendum being void in Law as it séems Hob. 10. Fryer and Gildridg 36 The Obligée made the wife of one of the Obligors his Executrix Debt extâ—â— and died the woman Executrix administred then her husband being one of the Obligors made her his Executrix and died leaving assets to pay the debt then she died and a stranger took administration of the goods of the Obligée unadministred and brought his action against the surviving Obligor but it was adjudged per Curiam that the action would not lie because when one of the Obligors made
be revoked So if I make my testament irrevocable yet may I revoke it for my act or my words cannot alter the judgement of the Law and make that irrevocable which of his own nature is revocable c. And therefore if I be bound by obligation to stand to the award of I. S. albeit if I discharge that arbitrement I shall forfeit my bond Yet is my submission in that case revocable and so is the book in 5 E. 4. 3. b. which séems to be contrary in that point well reconciled c. Restraint to demise void 18 The Charter of the Incorporation of Suttons Hospital restrains them to alien or demise but in a certain forme Co. l. 9. 30. b. 4. in the case of Suttons Hospital this is onely a precept and ordinance testifying the Kings desire but binds not in Law So likewise in another part of the same Charter the exemption of the Ordinaries jurisdiction is but a clause declaratory For being a Lay-corporation it neither can or ought to be visited c. A defective â—â—â—re 19 In the case of Monopolies in the 11 Report Co. l. 11. 85. b. 3. in the case of Monopolies the Defendant being charged by the Plaintiffe to have sold Cards c. contrary to the priviledge granted to the said Plaintiff by Letters Patents of Qu. Eliz. c. puts in this barre that the City of London is an ancient City and that within it time out of mind c. there hath béen a society of Haberdashers and that within the said City there was a custom Quod quaelibet persona de societate illa usus fuit consuevit emere vendere liberè mâ—rchandizare omnem rem omnes res Marchandizabiles infra hoc regnum Angliae de quocunque vel quibuscunque personis c. and pleaded farther that he was Civis liber homo de civitate societate illa and that he sold playing Cards c. as was lawful for him to do c. But the Justices gave no regard to this Barre because it was no more than what the Common Law would have said and then no such particular custome ought to have béen alleaged For in his quae de jure communi omnibus conceduntur Consuetudo alicujus patriae vel loci non est alleganda and with this accords 8 E. 4 5. c. Dyer 19. b. 115. 28 H. 8. 20 The Lessor covenants Lessee may take boots without assignment that the Lessée shall have sufficient Hedg-boot by the assignment of his Bailiff In this case for as much as this covenant is in the affirmative and floweth from the Lessor and is no more than what the Law gives a Lessée priviledge to do per Baldwin and Fitzherbert the Lessée may take Hedg-boot without assignment Tamen quaere for Shelley is of another opinion because Cujus est dare ejus est disponere Modus conventio vincunt legem and the Lessée also séems to be bound by the acceptance of the lease upon those termes Ideo quaere Howbeit if I let to one two acres of Meadow and that it shall be lawful for the Lessée to cut the grasse by the assignment of the Lessor yet the Lessée may cut the grasse without my assignment Dyer 179. 45. 2 Eliz. 21 A man seised in fée of lands in Burrough English since the Statute of 27 H. 8. makes a feoffment in fée to the use of himself Burrough English and the heirs males of his body engendred Secundum cursum communis legis and after dies seised accordingly having issue two sons In this case the youngest sonne shall have the land notwithstanding the words before Vide 26 H. 8. 5. Dyer 230. 57. 6 Eliz. 22 The Lord by Knight-service releaseth and confirms to the Tonant to hold by a Spurre In this case Tenure the new reservation is void upon the estate before created Howbeit the tenure by fealty still remains Dyer 238. 36. 7 Eliz. 23 A Coroners Inquest indicts a man of murther quòd fugam fecit Coroners Inquest and upon his arraignment he is acquit and another found guilty ut oportet and it was also found that he did not flie yet he shall forfeit his goods for upon his arraignment in this case the flight shall not be given in charge because they were before forfeited by the Coroners Inquest Hob. 5. Crow and Edwards 24 In debt upon an obligation of 60 l. for the payment of 31 l. 10 s. at Coventry issue was taken that the money was paid at Coventry Trial in forreign County and yet by consent of parties and a paper Rule of Court the issue was tried at London and found for the Plaintiff and judgement given Howbeit upon a Writ of Errour brought in the Exchequer Chamber the judgement was reversed for consent of Parties cannot change the Law Hob. 13. Sir Daniel Norton and Simmes 25 If a Sheriff will make an Vnder-sheriff Sheriffe provided that he shall not serve Executions above 20 l. without his special warrant this proviso is void as being against Law and Iustice For albeit he may choose not to make an Vnder-sheriff at all or may make him at his will and so remove him wholly yet he cannot leave him an Vnder-sheriff and yet abridg his power no more than the King may in case of the high Sheriff himself Vide 167. 52. Hob. 120. Smales and Dale 26 Albeit a Tenant in Common enter into the whole Tenants in Common and claim all expresly yet he cannot thereby dispossesse his companion for the possession of him that so enters is over all lawful as well before such claime as after so as there is no possession altered by such claim and then a sole claim without more can never change the possession and without a change of possession which the Law protects it remains as before and therefore a Coparcener Ioyntenant or Tenant in common can never be disseised by his fellow but by an actual Ouster For the same reason it is that is a Tenant in Common do alone bring an action of trespasse against a stranger his action shall be abated by pleading him Tenant in Common with another albeit his entry were made generally and expresly into all which proves that the entry of one serves for all for else they could not joyn in an action of trespasse 66 Expressio eorum quae tacitè insunt nihil operatur â—pon the Qu. â—ant of the â—version deâ—and must be â—pon the â—â—nd 1 Queen Eliz. le ts for years rendring rent Co. l. 4. 73. Boroughs case payable at the receipt of the Exchequer at Westm Seu ad manus balivorum vel recâ—pturum c. with condition to be void for non-payment c. the Quéen grants the reversion in fée Here the demand of this rent ought now to be made upon the land For in the Quéens case the limiting of
is attainted of Felony the bloud on his part being corrupted the sonne as it séems to him hath but halfe the inheritable blood in him without corruption viz. the bloud of the mother and therefore he holds that such a sonne shall not be inheritable no not to his mother And with this agrées Bracton lib. 3. cap. 13. Non valebit felonis generatio nec ad hereditatem paternam vel maternam Si autem ante feloniam generationem fecerit talis generatio succedit in haereditatem patris vel matris a quò non fuerit felonia perpetrata because at the time of his birth he had two lawful blouds commixed in him which could not be corrupted by the attainder subsequent but onely as to him that offended See more of this matter Co. Inst pars 1. 8. a. Co. l. 11. 39. a. 4. in Metcalfs case 2 In an action of Accompt upon the judgement quod Computet No writ â—â—or befoâ— whole â—ment câ—â—pleated before the final judgement given for the arrerages and damages a writ of Error lyeth not for in that writ these words Si judicium inde redditum sit c. are meant not onely de principali judicio but also de integro judicio viz. When all the matter within the original is determined as in 34 H. 6. 18. in Humphrey Bohuns case in a Quare Impedit brought against two the one pleads to issue and the other confesseth the action upon which confession judgement is given and he against whom the judgment was given sues his waie of Error to remove the record into the Kings Bench but Prisot and the whole Court denied it because the writ of Error was to rehearse all those which were parties to the original writ and then the writ saith Et si judicium inde redditum sit tunc Recordarium illud habeatis c. By which it appears that the record shall not be removed by writ of Error before the whole matter be determined 〈◊〉 like 3 A writ of Trespasse is brought against two Co. ibid. b. 1. and the one appears and pleads so that he is attainted of the trespasse and judgement is given against him In this case the Defendant shall not have a writ of Error before the matter be likewise determined against the other c. The Lord Cromwels case against Cawary and others per Prisot tempore H. 6. 〈◊〉 like 4 In trespasse by the Lord of S. against one for his Cattle taken Co. ibib b. 2. 32 H. 6. 5 6. b. as to parcel the Defendant pleads not guilty and as to the rest he pleads another plea whereupon the Plaintiff demurs and after the issue was found for the Plaintiff upon which he had judgement In this case the Defendant shall not have a wait of Error until the whole matter be determined c. 〈◊〉 like 5 A man cast in a writ of Error upon a Iudgement given Co. ibid. b. 3. 39 H. 6. Error 11. where the judgement was given of the Principal and damages but not of the Costs Howbeit the writ was rejected because the writ is conditional Si judicium inde redditum sit c. 〈◊〉 like 6 In Formedon brought by Fitz-williams against Copley Co. ibid. b. 3. 12 Eliz. Dyer 291. the Demandant hath judgement of part c. And after the Tenant brings a general writ of Error before the discussion of the residue earnestly desired that the record might be removed into the Kings Bench but the Court would not grant it before the whole matter in demand should be determined for the Iustices of the Kings Bench should procéed without warrant if they should procéed upon a matter which is not determined and whereupon no judgement is given and the whole record ought to be either in the Common Pleas or in the Kings Bench also the original is intiâ—â— and cannot be here and there too c. 〈◊〉 Impe. 7 The next Advowson is granted to two Dyer 279. 8. 11 Eliâ— who joyn in a Quâ—â—e Impedit the one dies this shall cause the writ to abate 〈◊〉 not inheâ—blâ— 8 Baron and Feme being Donées in special tail Dyer 332. 27. 16 Eliz. the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue the Feme dies the issue shall not have the land for he ought to make his conveyance by both per Curiam â—ard 9 If an award be made for the performance of divers things on one side and nothing to be performed on the other it is a lame award Hob. 49. Nichol's case and void according to the book of 7 H 6. 10 A. brings an action of trespasse against B. C. and D. B. pleads not guilty whereupon issue was joyned C. and D. make a justification â—ob 70. Parkers case and thereupon after a replication a demurrer was joyned Hanging this demurrer the issue was tried against B. and damages given and judgement against him after which judgement the Plaintiff entred a Nolle prosequi against the Defendant C. and D. whereupon Error was brought by all the Defendants against the Plaintiff and the Error assigned was for that the Nolle prosequi had discharged all the Defendants but it was held that the Nolle prosequi against C. and D. had not discharged B. and so no error neither yet should C. and D. have joyned in this writ of Error because there was no judgement against them nor they grieved and the writ of Error is Ad grave daâ—â—um c. 68 Ex tota materia emergat Resolutio Co. l. 3. 59. b. 1. in Lincoln Colledg case 1 It is the office of a good Expositor of an act of Parliament to make construction of all the parts together Discontinâ—ance by the husband of 〈◊〉 wives land and not of one part alone by it selfe Nemo enim aliquam partem rectè intelligere possit antequà m totum iterum atque iterum perlegerit For example albeit the first branch of the Stat. of 11 H. 7. c. 20. makes the discontinuance alienation warranty and recovery made by the wife of the Inheritance of her deceased husband to be utterly void and of none effect Yet the clause following being joyned to the first with this conjunctive And that it shall be lawful for any person c. to whom the said Inheritance c. shall appertain to enter c. doth cléerly expound the generality of the words of the precedent branch And therefore the sense of both together is that they shall be void and of none effect by the entry of him unto whom the interest title or inheritance after the decease of the Feme doth appertain Howbeit they shall not be void but stand in force betwéen the parties themselves and against all others save onely against such as have title c. and they onely have power to make them void and of none effect by their entry as aforesaid For estates of Franktenement or Inheritance
A. his heires c. pay to B. 100 l. after B. hath issue under age and dies the marriage takes not effect In this case the estate is executed in the heir of B. and shall have relation to the making of the Indenture c. But if the Grantée of a Reversion die no attornment can be done to his heir So it is also where the Devisée dies before the Devisor c. Pl. Co. Brets and Rigdens case 345. Vide Shelleys case where the Indenture bound the land albeit execution was not taken out till after his death for the estate was executed by the Indenture and Recovery before execution which shall have a retro-spect to the Indenture And 11 H. 7. 12. Where the heir shall have execution upon a fine But if the Feoffor or Feoffée die before entry feoffment by livery within view shall not take effect So also in the Rector of Cheddingtons Case Co. l. 1. 155 156 by the death of Tho. the term is not certaine nor can vest in his executors Co. l. 3. 86. a. 1. The Case of Fines 20 If the Bishop or Baron make a Lease for life Bishop Baron and after grant the Reversion in Fée and the Lessée for life die in the life of the Bishop or of the Baron this is a Discontinuance It is otherwise if the Lessée for life survive the Bishop or Baron A thing execuâ—ed unalterable 21 H. recovers 75 l. in B. R. and assignes it by Déed inrolled to Queen El. in satisfaction of a due Debt as Collector of the Fifteens Co. l. 5. p. 2. 9â— Hoes Case provided if the Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer or any two of them dis-allow the assignment c. and revoke it by writing under their hands that then the assignment shall he void after the Defendant brings Errour and the judgment is affirmed and 5 l. Costs given after by Writ of Prerogative the Land of the Defendant was extended and Goods seised to the value of the Debt And afterwards three Barons revoke the assignment after the death of the Plaintiffe because the Plaintiffe had satisfied the Debt and his executor sues a Scire facias for the 75 l. and 5 l. Costs But it was adjudged that after execution had by the Queen which was the effect of the assignment the Revoâ—ation came too late for he that hath power of Revocation cannot revoke a thing lawfully executed So a Letter of Attorney cannot be revoked after it is executed Vide 7 H. 6. 42. and 7 H. 4. 2. The Debtée is out-lawed the Debtor payes to the King the Out-lawry is reversed In this case the Debtor shall recover against the Debtée So if the Goods of an out-lawed person be sold c. he shall have restitution of the Goods Co. l. 8. 96. b 4. in Mannings Case but upon a Fieri facias c. onely the value Vide 3. E. 3. 51. Recompence in value once lawfully executed shall not be devested albeit the title of the Demandant be afterwards dis-affirmed and evicted Remainder executed 22 If a remainder be once executed Co l. 8. 88 a. 1. in Buckmeres Case in a Writ of Formedon in the Descender he shall never speak of that remainder but the general Writ of Formedon in the Descender shall serve in that case and he shall count of an immediate Gift for a Formedon in remainder he cannot have after the remainder is once executed But if a Lease for life be made the remainder in tail to A. the remainder in tail to B. if A. die without issue in the life of the Tenant for life and B. put to his Formedon in the remainder in his Formedon he ought to make mention of the remainder to A. albeit it was determined and spent for the Demandant in the Formedon in remainder ought to make mention of all the precedent remainders in tail because in that case the remainder was never executed by way of descent 〈◊〉 London suit â—opt before â—â—dgment 23 The Mayor of London may alter the course of Iustice in a cause hanging before the Sheriffes viz. to send for the parties Co. l. 8. 1â—6 a 3 in the Case of the City of London and to stop the suit also if he find the Plaintiffe already satisfied but so he cannot do after judgment and this he may do by a custome there Judgment exâ—cuted irrevocable 24 There is a diversity betwixt a thing Collateral executory Co. l. 8 142. a. 1 Doctor Druries Case and executed for when an erronious judgment is given and after the judgment is reversed by Writ of Error Collateral acts executory are barred thereby as if a man hath judgment in a Quare impedit and hath a Writ to the Bishop and the Bishop refuse here the Plaintiffe upon this Collateral matter of refusal may have a Quare non admisit but if the Defendant reverse the judgment in a Writ of Error and after the Plaintiff in the Quare impedit brings a Quare non admisit the Defendant may plead no such Record Vide 26 E. 3. 75. per Willy and Hill So if A. in execution at the suit of B. upon erronious judgment and after escapes and after the judgment is reversed by Error the action upon the escape is gone for he may plead no such Record because without a Record the action is not maintainable but in that case if the Plaintiffe bring an action of Debt against the Sheriffe or Gaoler upon the escape and hath judgment and execution and after the first judgment is reversed yet this judgment upon that Collateral matter being executed shall remaine in force 7 H. 6. 42. a. Notwithstanding such reversal of the first judgment The Conusée of a Statute Staple in Detinue thereof upon Garnishment recovers by erronious judgment against the Garnishée and hath the Statute delivered unto him 4 H. 7. 11. the Garnishée brings a Writ of Error and the Conusée sues execution upon the Statute and hath it Here albeit the Garnishée reverse the judgment yet this execution shall not be avoided thereby because the Statute is already executed Likewise if a man recover by erronious judgment and present to a Benefice or enter into the perquisite of a Villain and after the judgment is reversed by Error yet because these Collateral acts are executed they shall not be afterwards devested Co. l. 11. 40. a. 3 in Metcalfes Cases 25 Vpon an interloqutory award of a Court Error lieth not till after judgment which is not definitive a Writ of Error lyeth not such as are these quod computer that the shall take an Assise in Waste to inquire of the Wasts in trespasse to inquire of damages In partitione facienda quod partitio fiat In admeasurement quod admensuratio fiet that a man shall be ousted of aide and the like upon which the Defendant shall not bring a Writ of Error but after judgment in
case if the Lord avow upon the Feoffée before tender of the arrerages he shall lose them as it is agréed in 7 E. 3. and 7. H. 4 c. And therefore in as much as in such Case the Common Law forces the Lord to avow upon the Feoffor for that reason at the Common Law such Seisin by the Feoffor necessitas causa was good 〈◊〉 Quare Imâ—â—â— against â—e King or 〈◊〉 19 Regularly Co. l. 7 26. b. 3. Halls Case a Quare Impedit brought against the Bishop and Incumbent without naming the Patron abates yet if the King presents to a Benefice and his Clerk is admitted instituted c. In this case a Quare Impedit may be brought for necessity against the Bishop or Incumbent for it lies not against the King So it was also of the Pope if he had usurped 12 H. 8. 12. 4 H. 7. 15 c. â—n Vicar geâ—â—â—al shall not â—â—â—fie but in 〈◊〉 of necesâ—â— 20 Albeit Co. l. 8. 69. a. 1 Trollops Case regularly the Vicar general cannot certifie excommunication yet he shall certifie it when the Bishop is in remotis aagendis viz. beyond Sea in the Kings Service but the Court must be acquainted therewith by matter of Record viz. by Writ out of the Chancery to direct them and not by the surmise of the party and then for necessity which is alwayes the Law of time for necessitas est lex temporis the Certificate of the Vicar General shall be allowed because no other can then do it for he onely ought to certificate to whom the Court may write to absolve the party as the Bishop or the Chancellor of the Vniversities Fee-simple â—â—th out of 〈◊〉 â—ing by â—â—â—essary withâ—â— Office c. 21 Reversion in the Queen upon an estate taile she grants it to T. in taile upon Condition that if be pay 20 s. Co. l. 8. 1. 6. b. 2. The Lord Staffords case at the receit of the Exchequer he shall have the said Reversion in Fée the Condition is performed the tenant in taile levies a Fine and his issue is barred And in this case the principal point was whether by the Condition performed the Reversion passed to T. And it was held that presently upon payment of the 20 s. by operation of Law the Fée was davested out of the Queen and vested in T. And this by necessity for if it should not vest at the time of the Condition performed it would never vest And therefore if in this Case either Office Petition Monstrance de droit or other thing should be requisite that would make the Quéens Grant void and would dis-able the Quéen to make such a Grant And with this agrées the Lord Lovels Case in the Commentaries for there it is said when the Condition is performed the Fée-simple shall be immediately out of the King without Petition Monstrance de droit or other circumstance for if he must tarry such circumstances then can it not vest presently and by consequent shall never vest because if the estate be not enlarged at the time of the enlargement appointed then shall it never be enlarged And therefore in such Cases for necessity the Fée-simple passeth out of the Quéen without any such circumstances with this also agrées Isabel Goodcheaps Case 49 E. 3. who being seised in Fée of an House in London holden of the King deviseth it to Richard Goodcheap and the heires of his body and for want of such issue to be sold by her Executors and she makes W. D. W. W. and I. de T. her Executors and dies without heir Rich. Goodch dies without issue whereby the House escheates to the King and after one of the Executors dies W. W. refuseth and W. D. sels the House and here the question was whether or no the Sale by one Executor was good but it was agréed by all that if the Sale were good it shall devest the House out of the King and the cause thereof is by necessity of Law for if the Sale did not devest the House at the time of such sale then could there be no Sale at all and the Executors who had but a power could not have any petition Monstrance de droit or other remedy Co. l. 8. 143. a. 2. Doctor Druries Case 22 There is a diversity betwixt mean acts done in Execution of Iustice which are compulsive and acts which are voluntary A diversity betwixt acts compulsive and volunâ—â—â— acts And therefore if erronious judgment be given in Debt and the Sheriff by force of a Fieri facias sell the Defendants term and after the judgment is reversed by a Writ of Error yet the term shall not be restored but onely the summe c. But if a Capias utlagatum be awarded whereby the Sheriff is commanded to take the body ut bona catalla quae per inquisitionem invenerit in manus nostras capias de vero valore c. And by force of this Writ the Sheriff by inquisition takes the Goods and Chattels of the out-lawed person and sels them and after the Out-lawry is reversed in this case the party shall be restored to his Goods and Chattels because the Sheriff was not commanded nor compelled by the Kings Writ to sell them Co. l. 9. 49. a. 4. The Earl of Shrewsburies Case 23 King James grants to the Earl of Shrewsbury the Stewardship of the Mannors of M. and B. An Earl may make a Depâ—ty but in the Patent power of making a Deputy was omitted neverthelesse it was adjudged that hee might make one for if such an Office descend to an Infant Ideot or man of non sane memoriae they by necessity ought to exercise it by Deputy So an Earl for the necessity that the Law intends of his attendance upon the King and the Common-wealth this Stewardship of a base Court shall be exercised by Deputy Co. l. 9. 66. a. 1. Mackallies ca. 24 An arrest in the night is lawful An arrest in the night laâ—ful as well at the suit of a Subject as of the King for the Officer ought to arrest him when he can find him otherwise he may perhaps never arrest him for Qui malè agit odit lucem and if the Officer do not then do it the Plaintiff may have an Action upon the Case against him and recover his losse in damages Therefore by necessity an arrest in the night is lawfull Co. ib. 66. b. 2. 25 The Lords day is not Dies juridicus An arrest the 〈◊〉 Sabbath and therefore judicial acts ought not to be done upon that day but Ministerial acts may in some Cases be lawfully executed upon that day as an arrest for otherwise perhaps they might never be executed and Christ permits Works of Necessity to be done upon that day bonum est benefacere in Sabbato Executors may sell lands in their owne names 26 If Attorneys have power by writing to make Leases by
the Plaintiffe himselfe confesse that they committed the Trespass severally there the writ shall abate and so observe the diverstty betwixt the finding of a Iury and the confession of the party because this is his own Act but that the Act of the Iurors F. N. B. 11. c. 62 If there be Lord and Tenant Distresse for more Rent then is due justifiable and the Tenant payes the Lord a greater Rent then is due to him and that voluntarily without cohersion of distresse here the Lord having gained seisin of so much Rent may distraine the Tenant for such surplussage of Rent and the Tenant cannot avoid the Lord in his avowry because of the seisin which the Lord had of so much Rent Howbeit he may have remedy by the writ of Ne injuste vepes grounded upon the Statute of Magna Carta cap. 10. but before that Statute he had no remedy as it séemes 〈◊〉 none by â—â—ance 63 In a writ of Entry sur disseisin F.N.B. 21. c if the original writ wants these words Quam clamat esse Jus haereditatem suam it is error yet if the Tenant admit the writ and pleads to the action and loseth he shall not assigne this default in the writ for error because he hath admitted the writ by his plea So likewise in a writ of detinue of Charters if the Plaintife in his Count declare not the certainty of the land it is a just cause of error yet if the defendant admit the Count good and pleads to the Action and loseth by judgment in a writ of error sued by him he shall not Assigne this default in the Count for error because he hath admitted it for good by his Plea Tamen quaere â—esentment â— an Advowâ— 64 A man may have an Assise of darrein presentment F. N. B. 13. q. l. albeit neither he nor his Ancestors presented to the last avoidance As if Tenant for life or years or in Dower or by the courtesie suffer an usurpation to the Church c. and die he in reversion that is heire to the Ancestor that last presented shall have an Assise of darrein presentment if he be disturbed But if a man presents and after grants the Advowson for life to another who suffers an usurpation or two or thrée usurpations and dies In this Case at the next avoidance he in the reversion shall not have an Assise of darrein presentment if he be disturbed to present because the Lessée was in by his own Act Howbeit his heire may have it but that is by the provision of West 2. cap. 5. So likewise if a man present to an Advowson and after let if for term of years and then the Church becomes void and the Tenant for yeares presents and after the Incumbent dies and the Lessor presents and is disturbed in this Case it séemes the Lessor shall not have an Assise of darrein presentment causa quà suprà And the termer for years presented in his own right â—â—â—ative 65 If a man hath a Chappel or Chantery Donative F.N.B. 35. e. and he presents once to the Ordinary his Clerke to that Chappel or Chantery In this Case he shall never make Collation afterwards but he ought to present to the Bishop and if he present not within six moneths the Ordinary shall have advantage of the lapss 〈◊〉 utrum 66 If a Parson receive Rent or fealty of the Tenant for the land aliened by his Predecessor he shall not have a juris utrum during his life F.N.B. 50. e. but his Successor may have it Recognisance â—â—charged 67 If the Recognisor enfeoffe a stranger of one parcel of the land charged and likewise enfeoffe the Recognisée of another parcel thereof F.N.B. 104. n. 105. e. and afterwards the Recognisée sues execution against the Recognisor and the other feoffée In this Case the feoffée shall have an Audita quaerela against the Recognisée and thereby discharge his land because the Recognisée hath discharged his parcel of the land by his owne Act. â— warrantia â—â— and â—â—cher 68 If a man be impleaded in any Action F.N.B. 134. i. in which he may vouch the party against whom he hath a warranty in such Case he shall not have a warrantia cartae against him but he ought to vouch him to warranty and if he vouch him not in such Action he shall never after have any action of warrantia cartae against him to maintain his title F. N B. 142. k. 69 If there Lord and Tenant and the Tenant make feofment by collusion and the Lord accept the services of the feoffée In this Case Wardship Collusion the Lord shall not afterwards have the wardship of the Tenants heir nor averre the Collusion F. N. B. 144. 0. 70 If a man be intitled to have a writ of Escheate Acceptance barres Escheate and he accepts the homage of the Tenant in this Case he shall not have a writ of Escheate against him afterwards because he hath accepted him for his Tenant So also it séemes reasonable if he accept fealty of him that in such Case also he shall not have a writ of Escheate Howbeit it is not so of Rent because the former are solemne services which the law respects more then Rent Vide suprà Max. 91. Pl. 19. Pl. Co. 66. a. 2. in Dive and Maninghams Case 71 When a man demurres he is to do it generally Pleading anâ— special demuâ— and not upon any special matter for otherwise he is tied up to that special matter and cannot take advantage of any other error or default in the declaration or other pleading And therefore in Dive and Maninghams Case in the Commentaries where the Defendant concludes unde ex quo scriptum praedictum non fuit factum sub tale conditione quali per Statutum fieri deberet petit judicium Here this special conclusion hath so straightned the Defendant that if the obligation were void for any other cause then what is mentioned in the conclusion the Defendant could not have benefit thereof by Order of Law So also in 34 H. 6. which is there also quoted where one deviseth a reversion of a Tenant for life to another in fée per nomen omnium terrarum tenementorum quae in manibus le Devisor ad tunc fuerunt and the heire of the Devisée brings an Action of waste reciting in his count the special grant ut suprà And the Defendant saith ex quo pro narrationem praedictam apparet that the Devisor did not devise the reversion but by the words ut suprà and the Tenant for life then held the tenements and that nothing of the reversion by the general words passeth to the Devisée and so he demands judgement c. And thereupon the Plaintiffe also demurred And there it was held that in as much as the Defendant had demurred in a point in special and hath rehersed the
he may have an Action of Trespass against the Lord or Bailiff F.N.B. 9. g. 10 Vide sup Max. 118. R. 24. Parceners where parceners or heires in Gavel-kind may have a writ de rationabili parte or a Nuper obiit being ousted by one of their Coparceners Sée also suprà Maxime 118. Rot. 25. F.N.B. 21. c. 11 If a man be vouched and enter into Warranty and loseth Vouchee and Tenant by receit may havâ— a writ of Error he may have a writ of Error and assigne the Errors which have hapned betwixt the Demandant and the Tenant or betwixt the Demandant and the Vouchée So likewise he in reversion who prayes to be received for default of the Tenant for life or for his faint pleading here albeit he be received and plead and lose yet may he have a writ of Error and assigne the Errors that have hapned betwéen the Demandant and Tenant and the Demandant and him that so prayed to be received F.N.B. 99. b. 12 In a praecipe quod reddat against Baron and Feme Baron and Feme may have error at the Grand Cape the Baron appeares in proper person and the Feme by an Attorney who hath not sufficient warrant and thereupon judgment was given upon the default of the Feme against Baron and Feme c. yet if they were not duely summoned they may bring their writ of Error to reverse that judgment F.N.B. 135. d. 13 A man may have a Warrantia Cartae Recovery in value albeit he may vouch in the Action that is brought against him and if he recover in the Warrantia Cartae and afterwards lose in the Action brought against him in which he hath vouched him against whom he hath recovered the warranty then shall he have a writ of habere facias ad valentiam c. maintainable within a yeare after the recovery to recover in value according to his losse Plow 96. a. 1. 14 For Heriot-service the Lord may either distraine or seise Heriot-service and so he hath two several means to come by it 121 Consensus tollit Errorem When by consent no challenge 1 When in a writ of right the Iury that are to trie the méere right Litt. §. 514. Co. Inst p. 1. 294 a. 2. are once impanelled by the four Knights with the consent of both parties none of the 12 so chosen can be challenged because it is by consent of parties â—â—ebe may be â—â—rged 2 If the Parson of a Church charge the Glebe of his Church by his Déed Litt. §. 528. Co. ib. 300. a. Litt. § 648 Co. 34 3. a. Co. 301. a. 4. and the Patron having fée-simple in the Advowson and the Ordinary confirme that grant such grant shall stand in force according to the purport thereof Because done by the joynt consent of all the parties that can claime any interest in the Advowson So likewise may the Patron and Incumbent of a Chantery donative charge the land upon the same reason because the whole interest resides in them and the Ordinary is not to medle therewith Attornment 3 To avoid many inconveniencies Co. ib. 309. a. 3 Attornment was appointed by the Law which is nothing else but the consent of the particular Tenant to the reversioners grant And therefore it is said in the old Books Si Dominus attornare possit servitiam tenentis contra voluntatem tenentis tale sequeretur inconveniens quod possit eum subjugare Capitali inimico suo per quod teneretur sacramentum fidelitatis facere ei qui eum damnificare intenderet For such consent of the Tenant is conclusive and binds the Tenant to pay the purchaser the Rent and to performe all other services due for or in respect of the land 〈◊〉 facias 〈◊〉 â—â—nsent 4 In a Ejectione firmae upon the issue joyned the Plaintiffe makes suggestion to the Court that he the Sheriffe Co. l. 5. 36. b 4. in Baynehams Case Vide Dier 367 Pl. 40. 21 22 Eliz. and one of the Coroners were of the liveries of the Earle of Worcester and therefore that he had caused the Venire facias to be directed to the other Coroner and the Defendant also confessing the suggestion the venire facias was allowed accordingly and upon the trial the Verdict passed for the Plaintiffe Howbeit afterwards the Court was moved to arrest judgment because the suggestion did not containe principal challenge sed non allocatur because the venire facias was awarded ex assensu partium â—y things â—nsent 〈◊〉 5 A Common Recovery differs from the judgment and procéeding in other real actions Co. l. 5. 40. b 2 in Dormers Case for this reason amongst others because it is had by the mutual consent of the parties 39 E. 3. 1. The Demandant and Tenant consent that two of the four in a writ of right shall be Esquires albeit by the Law they ought to be all Knights and well because by consent 44 E. 3. 3. Trial of Villanage altered from natural trial by consent 7 H. 6. 7. Pleader of feofment in fée upon Condition without Déed and re-entry is good if the other part confesse the Condition 34 E. 3. Title Office de Court 12. If 12 be sworne and one departs another of the Panel by consent may be sworne and with the 11 give the Verdict 11 H. 6. 13. The Court in a Quare Impedit may by consent give longer day then is limited by the Statute of Marlebridge H. 4. The Statutes of 2 E. 3. 20 E. 3. provide that neither for the great Seal nor little Seal Iustice shall be delayed yet when the matter concernes the King onely if he command it it may be stayd F. N. Br. 21. b. 27 H. 8. A Tenure may be created at this day by consent of all notwithstanding the Statute of quia emptores terrarum 6 E. 6. Dier 78. By special consent of the Parties re-entry may be for default of payment of Rent without demand thereof 〈◊〉 by conâ— none 6 In a writ of Error to reverse a fine Co. l. 5. 45. b. Gages Case the Error assigned was for that the writ of Covenant bare Teste the 24 of April returnable 15 Paschal which in truth was 15 of April and so returne before the Teste And it was resolved that per totam Curiam that it should be amended because fines and common recoveries are but common assurances had by the mutual consent of the parties and therefore such mis-prisions may be amended Howbeit in other actions no amendment shall be in such Case So in 18 El. inter Norreys and Braybrooke A writ of Error was brought to reverse a recovery in 19 H. 8. and the Teste was a day after the return neverthelesse because it appeared to be but a mistake of the Clerke and was in the Case of a Common recovery which passeth by consent it was amended Co. l. 6.
Condition that he shall kill J. S. the bond is void So if a man make a feofment upon Condition that the Feoffée shall kill I. S. the Estate is absolute and the Condition void so as he who intends any unlawful Act is still by the Law crost in the designe or purpose he aimes at Dier 28. a 16. 31 H. 8. 7 Vice is so odious in the eie of the Law Bloud corrupt that it will not suffer any to inherit who derives his title through bloud tainted with any Capital offence As if a man hath issue two Sonnes and the eldest in the life of the Father is attainted for felony and dies living the Father and after the Father dies seised of the land in Fée this land shall discend to the younger Sonne as heire to his Father if the eldest Sonne hath no issue living but if he hath issue in life who by the Law should inherit the Land if it were not for the Attainder and albeit he hath committed no offence yet the land shall not discend to him nor yet to the younger Brother but shall escheate to the Lord of the Fée 140 Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita â—â—feit inâ—â— no good 〈◊〉 1 Where an Indictment is found insufficient Co. l. 4. 45. a. 1 in Vaux his Case the offender may be indicted again for in such Case Autre fois acquite or convict is no good plea because that plea is allowed upon that Maxime of the Common Law viz. that the life of a man shall not be put in jeopardy twice for one and the same offence Howbeit this is intended upon a lawfull acquital or Condition for otherwise his life was never put in jeopardy but when the Indictment or other procéeding against him are insufficient he may be re-indicted For the Law doth abhorre that great offences should passe un-punished according to these ancient Maximes of the Law and State Maleficia non debent remanere impunita impunitus continuum affectum tribuit delinquendo minatur innocentes qui parcit nocentibus Howbeit if upon an insufficient Indictment of felony a man hath had judgment quod suspendatur collum and so is attainted which is the judgment and end that the Law hath appointed for felony in this Case he shall not be again indicted and arraigned until that judgment be reversed by Error 〈◊〉 it goods 〈◊〉 2 The Reason why bona waviata viz. Co l. 5. 109. a. 4 in Fauxleys Case such shelme goods as a felon in flying waives or leaves behind him are forfeit to the King and that the owner shall in such Case lose his property in them is because of the negligence and default in the owner for that he made not fresh suit to apprehend the felon for Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat And therefore the Law hath imposed this penalty upon the owner that if the felon by his industry and fresh suit be not taken by such default he shall lose all his goods which the felon so leaves behind him â—â—â—es taken intendâ—â— 3 In many Cases Penal Statutes shall be taken by intendment Co. l. 11. 44. b. in Alexander Pollers Case and not according to the expresse words thereof especially when it is to remedy a mischiefe in advancement of Iustice and for the suppressim of Crimes and heinous offences of which sée many examples in the book at large quoted in the margent â—ption 4 In a writ of Reception F. N. B. 72. h. where after Replevin the party distraines again for that same thing the Sheriffe is comanded to apprehend the party so offending and so to chastise him by amerciament quod castigatio illa in casu consimili timorem aliis praebeat delinquendi 〈◊〉 breaâ—â— 5 A man was put into the Stockes upon suspition of Felony Dier 99. a. 60. 1 Max. and another comes who lets him go at large this is felony at the Common Law de frangend prison albeit the party that escaped be not indicted for felony â—â—lt â—â—â—der 6 In Banco Reg. in the Case of one Tripcony the Iury to the Nisi prius gave the Plaintiffe but 40 l. damages for the cutting of his right hand Dier 105. a 4. 1 2 P.M. and they were increased by the Iustices to 100 l. because this was matter apparent to the Court and the offence and trespass therein was caried about with the person howbeit in the Case of Sir John Bonham against the Lo. Sturton for slander where the damages were 500 Marks the Iustices said they could not lessen them Dyer 211. 33. 4 Eliz. 7 By the better opinion albeit the Statutes of 27 H. 8. 4. 28. H. 8. 15. Admiral be penal and ordaine that Commissions to heare and determine piracies shall be awarded to the Admiral and others to be named by the Chancellor yet the Lord Keeper being no Chancellor may grant such Commissions and that for the necessity to punish such offences 141 It favoureth Justice and right Co. Inst p. 1. 33. a. 1. 1 In a writ of Dower brought against the heire tout temps prist is a good plea before demand to barre the woman of the meane values and damages because the heire holdeth by title Plea in dowâ— and doth no wrong till a demand be made It is otherwise in a writ of Ayd Cosinage c. where the land and damages are to be recovered for there such a plea is not good because in that Case the Tenant of the land hath no title but holdeth the land by wrong Co. ib. 103. a. 4 b. 1. 2 If there be Lord and Tenant by Homage Ancestrel Homage ancestrel contiâ—nued and the Tenant alien the land in Fée although it be but upon a Condition which is performed at the day yet is the tenure gone for ever because the privity and Estate being once discontinued it is for ever after extinct But if the land be recovered against the Tenant upon a faint title and the Tenant recover the same again in an Action of an higher nature there the Homage Ancestrel remaines for the right which is favoureth in Law was a sufficient meane for the continuance thereof so it is also if he had reversed it in a writ of Error Co. Inst p. 1. 143. a. 4. 3 Before the Statute of quia emptores terrarum if a man had made a feofment in Fée rendring Rent he might have distrained for the Rent arreare of Common Right and in Case he had made no reservation of Rent or service yet the Feoffée should then have held of the Feoffor by such services as the feoffor held over of the Lord paramount So as albeit the Feoffor were negligent and made no provision or reservation of Rent or service yet the Law it selfe so much regarded Equity and Iustice that it created a tenure where the party was
Action Also after the escape if the Capias ad satisfaciendum be not returned and filed it may be renued against the Prisoner Co. l. 3. 64. a. 4. Pennants case 22. A man leases his Land Acceptance of rent no confirmation upon condition that the Lessee shall not assigne any part thereof the condition is broken and the Lessor before notice of the assignment accepts the rent due after such assignment In this case the condition being collaterall the breaking thereof may be so secretly contrived that it is not possible for the Lessor to come to the knowledge thereof and therefore notice in this case is materiall and issuable for otherwise the Lessee should take advantage of his owne fraud It is otherwise if a Lease be made with condition of re-entry upon non-payment of the rent for in such case both parties may take notice thereof by the Indenture and therefore by acceptance of the rent afterwards the Lessor dispenseth with the Condition and confirmes the Lease Co. l 3. 76. b. 2. Fermors case 23. A. possessed of divers parcells of Land within the Mannor of S. for years at will and by copy and also of others there in fee Fine no barâ— to the Lord. demiseth the whole to B. for life and thereupon levies a Fine to B. c. of so many acres as amount to the whole Land continues possession and payes the rents to the Lord In this case albeit five yeares passe yet the Lord is not barred for it is unreasonable to give the Lessee benefit in this case of the Lessors non-claime when the tort and covin of the Lessee is the cause of his non-claime for a man shall not take advantage of his owne covin or wrong Co. l. 4. 82. a. 4. Sir Anthony Corbeâ—s case 24. A. deviseth his Land to B. till eight hundred pounds be raised for the preferment of his Daughters and dyes Devise to raise money C. his heire conceales the Will enters and dyes In this case B. shall have allowance for the time that the Will was concealed and shall hold the Land so much the longer according to the time that the Will was so concealed untill the eight hundred pounds may be raised for it is against reason that the heire should enter upon the Land so much the sooner because his concealment of the will was a wrong and then he should take advantage of his own wrong Waste in a Colemine 25. A. demiseth a Close to B. wherein there is a Colemine un-opened Co. l. 5. 12. b. 3. in Sanders case B. opens the Mine and assignes his terme to C. except all Mines C. digs Coles out of the Mine and A. brings an Action of waste against C. in this A. shall recover locum vastarum and the exception shall not excuse it for the opening of the Mine by B. was a tort and that being committed if B. should excuse or avoid it by the exception he should thereby take advantage of his own wrong 26. If A. grants to B. one hundred cords of wood to be cut downe and taken by the assignment of A. If A. in convenient time after request by B. do not assigne them B. may take them himselfe without any assignment Co. l. 24. b. 4. in Sir Thomas Palmers case for the Grantor in such case by his own act or default shall not derogate from his grant nor take advantage by such his neglect of non-assignment there is the same Law of Estovers c. to be assigned by the Bayliff of a Mannor c. Executor de son tort 27. An Executor of his own wrong shall not retaine goods in his own hands to satisfie his proper debt Co. l. 5. 30. b. 3. in Coulters case for then he should take advantage of his own wrong which the Law will not permit Age not allowed 28. Regularly in all reall actions at the Common Law Co. l. 6. 4. b. 3. in Markals case if the Tenant be within age and in by descent he shall have his age Howbeit if the Action be founded upon his owne wrong as in Cessavit upon his cesser in such case he shall not have his age For then he should take advantage of his own wrong After Judgement the bond not valid 29. A. hath Iudgement in an Action of debt upon an Obligation Co. l. 6 45. b. 2. in Higgens case the Defendant brings a Writ of Error and hanging the Writ of Error the Plaintiff brings a new Action of debt upon the same Obligation but it was adjudged he could not for untill the Iudgment be reversed by Error the Obligation remaines quasht and if there be Error in the proceeding that is the Plaintiffs fault and he shall not take advantage of his own tort or default Release to a Joynt-tenant 30. A. and B. are Ioynt-tenants for life Co. l. 6. 78. b. The Lord of Abergavenies case and Iudgement is had against A. in debt who releaseth to B. and B. dyes In this case albeit the terme is expired so as the Reversioner may enter yet the Land shall stand charged with the Iudgement during the life of A. for otherwise A. should take advantage of his own Act and thereby avoid the debt and Iudgment of the Creditor who is a stranger to the release Action upon the case 31. A. recovers against B. in the Common Pleas and dyes Co. l. 7. 4. b. 2. in Bulwers case C. upon the Iudgment in the name of H. outlawes B. in the Hustings of London die lunae proximum post festum Simonis Judae and thereupon P. is taken by a Capias Utlagatum in Norfolke and there imprisoned whereupon B. brings an Action upon the case against C. Quia maliciose deceptive machinatus est c. And in this case it was objected that the Capias Utlagatum was erronious because the Outlawry was therein recited to be proximum ante festum c. but that exception was not allowed because the error in the Writ which the Defendant C. had tortiously pursued shall give no advantage to himselfe but in as much as B. the Plaintiff was imprisoned and molested thereby he had thereupon good cause of Action The heire not estopt 32. Where Lands were conveyed to Baron and Feme Co. l. 8. 53. b. 3. in Sims his case 18. E. 3. fo 9. and to the heires of the Baron and the Baron gives them in tail the Baron dyes the Feme recovers the Land against the Donee by a writ of Cui in vita supposing that she had the Land to her and her heires in fee the Feme after the Recovery enfeoffs another and dyes the Donee in tail dyes without issue the issue of Baron and Feme brings a Formedon in Reverter against the Feoffee of the Feme And in this case albeit the issue was heire to the Feme and thereby estopt by the Recovery in the Cui in
known because the losse of many causes dependeth thereupon As in Battery if the Defendant can justifie the same to be done of the Plaintiffs own assault he must plead it specially and must not plead the generall Issue Co. ibid. 4. In Trespasse of breaking his Close Trespasse upon not guilty he cannot give in Evidence that the Beasts came thorough the Plaintiffs Fence which he ought to keep nor upon the generall Issue justifie by reason of a Rent-charge Common or the like Co. ibid. 283. a. 1. 5. In Detinue the Defendant pleadeth non detinet Detinue in this case he cannot give in Evidence that the goods were pawned to him for money and that it is not paid but he ought to plead it Howbeit he may give in Evidence a gift from the Plaintiff for that proveth he detaineth not the Plaintiffs goods Co. ibid. 6. In Waste upon the Plea non fecit vastum Waste he may give in Evidence any thing that proveth it no Waste as by tempest lightning enemies or the like but he cannot give in Evidence justifiable Waste as to repaire the House or the like for that will cause a Variance between the Evidence and the Issue Co. ibid. l. 5. 119. Whelpdales case 7. If two men be bound in a Bond joyntly and the one is sued alone Joynt Obligees he may plead this matter in Abatement of the Writ but he cannot plead non est factum for it is his Deed though it be not his sole Deed See Whelpdales case where a man may safely plead non est factum where not and former books that treat of that matter well reconciled Co. Inst 1. 303. b. 4. See also more of this matter Co. Inst ubi supra c. And here note that in matter of pleading to prevent variance each party must be very circumspect in the ordering thereof least his Replication depart from his Count or his Rejoynder from his Bar Et sic de cetaeris Likewise what is departure in pleading and what not See Co. Inst 1. 304. per totam paginam pl. Co. 105. b. Variance inter Writ and Count. 8. Co. l. 5. 37. a. 4. Bishops case Co. l. 8. 163. a Blackamores case In an Action upon the case Variance was found betwixt the Writ and the Count in the Defendants name for in the Count he was named George and in the Writ Christopher and after Iudgement for the Plaintiff in the Common Place upon a Writ of Error in the K. B. the Iudgement was reversed by reason of that variance for the Statute of 18 Eliz. 14. gives remedy where there is no Originall Writ but not where there is a Writ and a materiall variance betwixt the Writ and Count c. Variance inter Originall and Judgement 9. There ought not to be any variance betwixt the Originall Writ Co. l. 9. 74. a. 1. Doctor Husseyes case and the Iudgement given thereupon but the Iudgement ought to be conformable to the Originall because it is grounded thereupon And therefore in Ravishment of Ward if the Action be grounded upon the Statute of Westm 2. 35. according to the forme of the Writ there prescribed the Plaintiff cannot have Iudgement at the Common Law but the Iudgement ought to be conformable and pursuant to the Originall Writ which is the Foundation and ground of the Iudgement Vide plus ubi supra Variance of names 10. The Dean and Cannons of Windsor Co. l. 10. 124. b. 2. Linne Regis case Winâ—ates case 29. 30. Eliz. Hob. 124. were incorporate by the Statute of 22 E. 4. by this name The Dean and Cannons of the Kings free Chappell c. And in the Raigne of P. and M. they made a Lease of certain Lands by this name The Dean and Cannons of the King and Queens free Chappell c. And in an Ejectione firmae brought by Wingate against Hall M. 29. and 30. Eliz. the Lease for that variance was adjudged void The like 11. Merton Colledge in Oxford Co. ibid. 125 a. 2. was incorporate by Act of Parliament anno 1. M. Per nomen Guardiani Scholarium Domus sive Collegii Scholarium de Merton c. And they made a Lease per nomen domus sive Collegii de Merton omitting Scholarium Merton Colledge case in B. R. And in an Ejectione firmae H. 30. Eliz. This omission was agreed to be a variance in substance to quash the Lease for the sayd Act hath Baptized the Colledge by the name of the Colledge of the Schollars of Merton and they made the lease by the name of the Colledge of Merton himselfe who in truth was the Founder Aud quer 12. In an Audita querela F. N. B. 104. 5. variance betwixt the Writ and the Record shall cause the Writ to abate Variance inter brief and â—â—â—nt 13. In Debt upon the Statute of 32 H. 8. 9. Pl. Co. 79 b. 4. Partridges case made against buying pretenced Titles c. That Statute was recited in the Count to commence the 28 of Aprill anno 32 H. 8. whereas it did begin the 28 of Aprill anno 31 H. 8. and was continued by prorogations untill 32 H. 8. and for that variance the Count was adjudged defective The like 14. In 20 H. 6. A man brings a Writ of Forger of false Weights Pl. ibid. 84. b. 3. and the Writ was Diversa facta munimenta c. and he counts but of Deed only and Per totam curiam for that variance the Writ shall abate Writ and Count. 15. In a Writ De consuetudinibus servitiis if the Demandant say F. N B. 15 1. 7 De reddibus arreragiis c. These words prove that the Demandant himselfe was seised of the Services and then if he count in such a Writ of the Seisin of his Ancestor and not of his own Seisin for that variance the Writ shall abate Dyer 150. 85. 3 4. P.M. 16. The Corporation of Eaton Colledge was erected by H. 6. A void lease Per nomen praepositi Collegii Regalis Collegij beatae Mariae de Eaton c. And in the time of E. 6. a Lease was made by Sir Thomas Smith and the Fellowes Per nomen Praepositi sociorum Collegii Regalis de Eaton and adjudged void for the variance Dyer 191. 22. 2 3 Eliz. 17. The relict of a Copyholder pleaded a Custome Custome to have the Copyhold during her life after her husbands death and upon the evidence the custome appeared to be only Durante viduitate and thereupon the Defendant demurring to the Evidence Iudgement was given against her Dyer 219. 11. 5. Eliz. 18. A man declares for the debt of 20 l. upon the sale of Wood Debt and gives in evidence but for twenty Markes it shall be found for the Defendant as if there had been variance in the things
the one being as ancient as the other as if a man hath a way over the Land of A. to his Franck-Tenement by Prescription time out of minde c. A. cannot alledge Prescription or Custome to stop the sayd way Co. l. 9. 109. b. 3. Meriel Treshams case 39. In Debt against an Administratrix she pleads in Bar Bar repugnant Quod ipsa plene administravit omina bona c. quae fuerunt c. quod illa nulla habet bona c. quae fuerunt c. nec habuit die impetrationis brevis c. praeter bona catalla ad valentiam of the Kings debt and of severall Recognizances by which plea she confesseth that she had sufficient in her hands to satisfie the sayd Debt and Recognizances And then she pleads further Quod ipsa nulla alia sive plura habet bona c. quae fuerunt c. Praeterquam bona catalla quae non sufficiunt ad satisfaciendum Praed seperalia debita Which is clearly and Ex diametro repugnant to what she had confest before and thereupon the sayd Bar was adjudged insufficient Co. l. 11. 80. b. 2. Lewes Bowles case 40. A Feme brings a Cui in vita quod clamat tenere ad vitam Cui in vita Contrariety and maintaines it in her Count by a gift in speciall Tail to her and her Husband and that her Husband is dead without Issue and the Writ abated for the contrariety of the Title for in the Writ she named her selfe but a bare Tenant for life whereas in her Count it appeared that she had such an Estate for life which had greater Priviledges incident unto it then a bare Estate for life hath Vide 18 E. 3. 37. Assignment of Errors Contrariety F. N. B. 21. b. 41. In a Writ of Error upon a Iudgement given in the Common Bench the Plaintiff cannot assigne for Error that the Iustices of the Common Bench did not give the Iudgement but that the Clarkes of their own heads did it Neither can he assigne for Error that the Iurors gave Verdict for the Defendant and that the Iustices entred it for the Plaintiff and gave Iudgement for him because such assignment is contrary to that which the Court doth as Iudges Remainder limited upon a contrariety 42. A Remainder limited upon a contrariety cannot be good Pl. Com. 29. b. 3. Colthrist and Bevisham as in the case of Rickill in Littleton S. 720. for when he had once made a Feoffment and vested the estate in one he could not make that estate cease as to him and cause it to remaine to another So if Land be given to a man and his heires so long as I. S. shall have heirs of his body and if I. S. die without heire of his body that then it shall remaine to another in fee this Remainder is void for the contrariety because the first estate was Fee-simple determinable upon which a Remainder cannot depend The like 43. If a Lease for life be made upon Condition Pl. Com. ibid. 32. a. 4. 34. b. 4. that if a stranger pay to the Lessor twenty pounds that then after the death of the Tenant for life it shall remaine to the stranger this is a good Remainder so if a Lease for life be made to Baron and Feme and it is appointed by the said Lease that if A. their eldest Son dye living the Baron and Feme that then it shall remaine to B. their second Son for life this is also a good Remainder for in these cases there is no contrariety because in the first the stranger shall have it expressely after the death of Tenant for life and in the other it is intendable that B. shall have the Remainder after the death of Baron and Feme But if a Lease for life be made upon Condition that if a stranger pay to the Lessor twenty pounds that then immediatly the Land shall remaine to the same stranger this Remainder is void for the contrariety because the Tenant for life ought to have it during his life during which time the stranger cannot have it Proviso repugâ—â—nt 44. C. makes B. and a Feme his Executors 19 H. 8. Dyer 4. Pl. 10. provided that B. shall not administer his Goods this Proviso is void for the repugnancy for when C. had made them once his Executors the severall powers limited to them afterwards are void because when the intent of a man who makes a Testament agrees not with the Law his intent shall be taken as void as if a man devise to H. in fee and if he dye without heire that M. shall have the Land this devise is void for the repugnancy as to M. for one Fee-simple cannot depend upon another Fee-simple by the Law Condition â—â—id 45. The Custome of London is Dyer 33. 12. 28 29 H. 8. that a man may devise his Purchase-Land in Mortmaine and a Purchasor devised by his Will that the Prior and Covent of Saint Bartholm and their Successors should have the Land Ita quod reddant annuatim Decano Capitulo Sancti Pauli 16. Marc. And if they failed of payment that their estate should cease and that then the said Deane and Chapter should have it and for the Condition broken those of Pauls entred and it seemed clear to Baldwin and Fitzh that the Condition was void for no estate could remaine after the Fee-simple given away because the Feoffor had determined his Interest and Right and then a stranger could not enter for the Condition broken but the heire ought to do it â—â—ape 46. In debt against the Sheriffs of London Dyer 66. a. 11. 3 E. 6. for an escape of a Prisoner out of Ludgate they plead that three years before Jerveis and Curteis their Predecessors suffered the same Prisoner to escape to Lambeth in Surrey he being then in their Guard in Ludgate Goale London which is impossible for the former Sheriffs could not let them go at large when he was imprisoned and in their custody at the time of the escape and then the escape ought to have been supposed in London where the Prison was for which repugnancy and other errors the Plea was adjudged void Dyer 68. b. 28. 5 E. 6. 47. An Indictment of Murder was adjudged insufficient Indictment for that the place of the assault was set down and not the place of the Murder nor these words adhuc Ibidem inserted in the Indictment in case the Assault and Murder were acted at one and the same place And this was for the uncertainty because the Assault and the Murder are of differing natures and might be done at severall places Dyer 209. 21. 3 4 Eliz. 48. A Lease is made for years upon Condition Condition repugnant that if the Lessor grant the Reversion the Lessee shall have fee the Lessor levies a Fine the Conusee brings a Quid juris
Disclaimer Error 2. If the Tenant disclaime Co. l. 8 61. b. 4. in Beechers case he shall not have a Writ of Error against his Disclaimer because by his Disclaimer he hath barred himselfe of his right in the Land for the words of the Disclaimer of the Tenant are Nihil habet nec habere clamat in illa terra nec die impetrationis brevis originalis c. habuit sive clamavit sed aliquid in illa terra habere deadâ—ocat disclamat And against this he cannot have a Writ of Error to have restitution of the Land against such Disclaimer Vide 6 E. 3. 7. F. N. B. 22. c. 170. None shall take exception to an Error or Act which operateth to his own advantage Co. l. 3. 69. b. 4. Lincoln Colledge case 1. C. and F. Ioynt-tenants for life Collaterall Warranty and to the heires of the body of C. intermarry and have Issue E. who after the death of C. disseiseth F. and suffers a common Recovery F. releaseth to the recoverors with Warranty and dyes also E. dyes without Issue and R. as heire male of the body of C. brings his Formedon in Descender and here the question was whether or no the collaterall Warranty of F. did bar the Demandant or that the heire in tail might have the Land by force of the Statute of 11 H. 7. 20 which gives Entry to the next Heire upon Discontinuance c. of the Inheritance of the Husband by the Feme But it was resolved that this case was out of the intention of the said Act because the intention of that Act was to restraine such women to make Discontinuance Warranty or Recovery in bar or prejudice of the heire in taile or of them in Remainder c. but when the heir in tail himself conveys assures the Land to others the release or confirmation of the Feme with Warranty is but to make perfect and corroborate the estate which the heire in tail hath made and therefore such Warranty is not restrained by the said Act for it shall be intended for the benefit of the heirs in tail and not to their prejudice And this is also the reason why a common Recovery in respect of the intended recompence was not restrained by the Statute of West 2. Co. l. 8. 59. a 3 in Beechers case 2. For the reversall of a Iudgement a man shall not assigne for Error that which maketh for his advantage Assignment of Error as to alleadge that he was essoined where he ought not to have been essoined or that he had a longer day then the common day or that he had ayd granted to him where it was not grantable or the like Vide 7 E. 3. 25. per Herle 8 H. 5. 2. 11 H. 4. 8. F. N. B. 21. f. Co. l. 11. 56. a. Benhams case 3. M. brings a Writ of Annuity against B. and they being at Issue Insufficient Verdict the Iury found for the Plaintiff and also the arrearages but did not assesse any damages or costs whereupon the Verdict was imperfect neither could it be supplyed by a Writ to inquire the damages Howbeit afterwards the Plaintiff released his damages and costs and thereupon had Iudgement whereupon the Defendant brings a Writ of Error and assignes for Error the insufficiency of the Verdict but the Iudgement was affirmed because the Plaintiffs release of the damages and costs was for the Defendants benefit and advantage and therefore ought not by him to be excepted against Vide 22 Eliz. Dyer 369 370. Where in a Writ of Ejectione Custodiae terrae haeredis the Iurors assessed damages intirely which was insufficient for it lyeth not for the heire yet the Plaintiff released his damages and had Iudgment for the Land Note that insufficient Assessment of damages and no Assessment is all one F. N. B. 22. d. 25. c. 4. It is not Error to suffer one to make an Attorney in an Action Attorney in which he ought not to make an Attorney because that is for his advantage 171 Nemo tenetur armare adversarium suum contrase Challenge 1 He that challengeth a Iuror for the hundred or for Cosinage Co. Inst pars 1. 157. a. 2. 4. must shew in what hundred he hath no land and how he is of kin and shall not drive the other party to shew it 2 The Plaintif in a Replevin pleads in barr of an Avowrie for damage fesant Co. l. 5. 78. b. 3. Grayes case that he hath common of Pasture by custom in the place where c. belonging to his Copyhold which custom was traversed and it was found that he had such Common there but withall that every Copyholder had used to pay time out of mind c. pro eadem communia unam Gallinam quinque ova annuatim and it was adjudged that upon this verdict the Plaintif should have Iudgement albeit he omitted in his barr the yearly payment of the Hen and five eggs And the reason was because the Plaintif was not bound to shew more than what made for him and tended to his advantage 172 It favoureth Diligence And therefore hateth Folly and Negligence Waste 1 Waste may be done in houses by suffering them by negligence to be uncovered whereby the spars fasters planchers Co. Inst pars 1. 51. a. 2. b. 2. or other timber of the house become rotten So likewise if he suffer a wall of the sea to be in decay so as by the flowing and reflowing of the sea the Meadow or Marsh adjacent is surrounded whereby the same becomes unprofitable Also the burning of an house by negligence or mischance is waste Waste 2 A prohibition of waste did lye at the Common law against tenant by the Curtesie tenant in Dower and a Guardian in Chivalry Co. ibid. 53. b. 4. because they were in by the Law but not against tenant for life or years because they come in by the Act of the lessor himself and therefore it is imputed to his own folly and negligence if upon granting the term he made not sufficient provision against committing of waste for in that case the Law did not aid him Vide Co. l. 4. 62. b. 3. in Herlakendens case Co. l. 5. 13. b. 3. in the Countess of Salops case Guardian in soccage 3 If Guardian in soccage marry the heir under 14 years of age without a convenient fortune Co. ibid. 88. a. 3. Littl. §. 123. he is compellable to make it good upon his accompt for it will be imputed to his own folly that he married him without provision of a convenient portion answerable to his estate Goods gaged 4 If goods be delivered to one as a gage or pledge Co. ibid. 89. a. 4. and be afterwards stollen from him yet he shall be discharged of them because he hath a property in them and therefore he ought to keep them no otherwise than as his
defendant pleads Judgement barr to the bond That the plaintif hath recovered upon the same bond and that the judgement thereupon is removed by Error into the Kings Bench and was not yet reversed And this was adjudged a good plea because the judgement takes away the strength of the bond and if after judgement he might sue the same party upon the same bond he might do it infinitely and consequently the defendant might be infinitely amerced for upon every Iudgement the defendant shall be amerced and if he be a Peer of the Realm the amerciament is 100 s. and so the defendant might be infinitely amerced upon one and the same obligation which would be mischievous Et interest Reipublicae ut sit finis litium Co. l. 7. 43. Kenns case 17 A bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be suffered for the infiniteness Bill of reviver no more than a writ by Iourneys accompts upon a former writ of the same nature for so they might be had infinitely Barrettry 18 A Barrettor is in judgement of Law accounted one of the most dangerous and pernicious vermin in the Commonwealth Co. l. 8. 37. in the case of Barretry because whereas the Law endeavoureth to settle peace and amity and to suppress discord and contention he is seminator litium oppressor vicinorum suorum either by force and open Maintenance of possessions or the like or by fraud and malice under colour of Law as by multiplicity of unjust and feigned sutes Informations or the like to the end he may by that means enforce poor people ad redimendum vexationem to give him money or otherwise to compound with him c. A bitrement 19 Vpon an award albeit the parties do not discover all their differences to the Arbitrators so as they determine some C. l. 8. 98. a. 4. in Baspoles case and leave the rest undetermined yet the award is good because otherwise many Arbitrements might be avoided for the one or the other of the parties may conceal a trespass done to him or some other secret cause of action and so avoid the Arbitrement which were inconvenient for Expedit reipublicae c. Accord 20 Accords are much favoured in Law Co. l. 9. 79. b. 4. in Peytoes case because they prevent and compose sutes and controversies amongst neighbours Et concordiâ parvae res crescunt discordiâ maximae dilabuntur And therefore it was adjudged P. 3 sac rot 1033. that an Accord with satisfaction was a good plea in barr in Eden and Blakes case Fines 21 The general Statute of 32 H. 8. 36. Co. l. 11. 75. a. 1. of Fines shall bind the King though he be not named because it was ordained for the setling and quieting of estates and the prevention of debates and controversies in the Commonwealth in Magdalen College case Assets descended a barr 21 The Statute of Glocester in 6 E. 1. cap. 3. ordains Co. l. 52. b. 4. in Syms case Pl. Co. 110. Fulmerstons case that where tenant by the curtesie aliens his wives inheritance with warranty if assets descend from the heir he shall be barred for the value of the inheritance so descended and if lands after descend that then the tenant shall recover against the heir of the seisin of his mother viz. out of the residu of his mothers lands so much as the assets afterwads descended shall amount unto Here albeit at the making of this Act being in 6 E. 1. there were no intailed lands for all Inheritance was then viz. before Westm ◠being 13 E. 1. feesimple absolute or conditional yet intailed lands are since taken to be within the equity of the said Act of Gloc. but not to retain or recover the lands intailed but only the lands which should so descend because otherwise there would be occasion of new sutes and contention which the Law hates and abhorrs for if the tenant after assets descended might retain or recover the lands intailed then if the assets were aliened the issues inheritable to the estate tail might by writ of Formedon in descender recover the intailed lands again which would beget a new sute and no way answer the Intention of the said Act being indéed a good provision for féesimple lands but not for lands entailed without such a construction by equity as aforesaid And therefore in case of entailed lands so aliened with warranty the tenant shall have a Scire facias out of the Rolls of the Iustices before whom the sute depends to recover the lands descended according to the provision of the said Act of Glocester which in just and proportionable equity agrées with the case of the feesimple lands and the Intention of the same Act. Vide supra 15. 9. infra 186. 8. 179 Circuit of Action Co. Inst part 1. 265. a. 3. 1 Littleton saith § 446. If the father be disseised Rebutter and the son having only a possibility release to the disseisor without warranty such release is void Howbeit if there be a warranty annexed to the release then the son shall be barred for albeit the release cannot barr the right because the son had no right in the land in the life of the father yet the warranty may rebut and barr him and his heirs of a future right which was not in him at that time And the reason which in all cases is to be sought out wherefore a warranty being a covenant real shall barr a future right is for avoiding of circuit of action which is not favoured in Law viz. That he who made the warranty should recover the the land against Terre-tenant and then the Terre-tenant by force of the warranty should have as much land in value against the warrantor which course would occasion Circuit of action and more trouble than needs Mauxels case 7. b. Finch 2 Where the father enfeoffeth his son and heir apparent with warranty and dieth Voucher the son in a praecipe brought against him may immediately vouch his fathers feoffor for the Law will not suffer him to vouch himself according to Max. 54. and so when he comes in as vouchee he may darraign the first warranty to avoid Circuit of Action Finch fol. 14. Fr. Edit F. N. B. 18. f. 3 In false Iudgement against an Abbot the plaintif was non-sute False Judgement and the Abot had a Scire facias against the plaintif to shew cause why he should not have execution returnable quindena Paschae at which day the plaintif appears and assigns his errors and tenders security to sue cum effectu and prays a Scire facias against the Abbot ad audiendum errores and the opinion of the Court was that he might assign his errors against the Abbot without suing out any Scire facias against him Finch pag. 55. 4 In an action of waste upon a lease for years by déed Waste wherein the lessor granteth to the
lessee that he shall not be impeached of waste the lessee may plead this in barr of the action of waste without bringing his action of Covenant Finch ibid. 5 Vpon the grant of a ward with warranty the defendant in a writ of right of ward may rebut the plaintif by that warranty and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant upon the grant to avoid circuit of action Finch fo 14. Fr. Edi. 6 One that hath rent issuing out of land disseiseth the terre-tenant Recouper in an Assise by the disseisee the disseisor shall recoup the rent in the damages and the reason is for avoiding circuit of action for otherwise when the disseisee re-enters the action for the arrerages of rent shall be received but Circuitus est evitandus boni Iudicis est lites dirimere ne lis ex lite oriatur Vide Co. l. 5. 31. a. 2. in Coulters case 180 Matter of Vexation And therefore Co. Inst part 1. 127. a. 1. 1 If the demandant or plaintif be non sute Plaintif amerced or judgement given against him he shall be amerced pro falso clamore for vexing and troubling the tenant or defendant without just cause Co. l. 5. 73. b. The case of Orphans 2 If any Orphan of London Oâ—phans which by the custom of that City is under the government of the Maior and Aldermen there sue in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Court of Requests c. for any goods money or chattels due unto them either by the custom of London or by any devise or legacy in the will of their Ancestor or to have accompt c. In such case a prohibition lyeth because the government of the Orphans of London belongs to the Maior and Aldermen of that City and they have Iurisdiction of them And per Popham if the Lord of a Manor hath probate of testaments within his Manor if any will prove such a will in the Ecclesiastical Court a prohibition lies because the jurisdiction thereof belongs to another And the reason of this is for that otherwise the party might have double vexation and trouble Iudgement drowns a â—oâ—d 3 Where a man hath judgement upon an Obligation Co. l. 6 45. a. 3. Higgens case he shall not afterwards bring an action of debt upon the same obligation against the same party not only because the judgement hath drowned the bond by changing it into a matter of record but likewise for that if he that so recovers might have another new action and another new judgment he might also by consequent have infinite actions and infinite judgements to the perpetual vexation and charge of the defendant and infinitum in lege reprobatur Co. ibid. 46. a. 2. And therefore if a man brings an action of debt upon an Obligation and is barred by the judgement as he so long as that judgement stands in force cannot have a new action Pari ratione when he hath judgement in an action upon the same Obligation so long as that judgement stands in force he shall not have a new action Sure in two Courâ—s 4 If any use the Countenance of Law which was instituted to prevent Co. l. 8. 60. a. 3. in Beechers case and make an end of controversies and vexation for double vexation he shall be fined As if a man sue in the Common pleas and afterwards for the same cause sue the defendant in London or any other Court the plaintif shall be fined for this unjust vexation 9 H. 6. 55. 14 H. 7. 7. And in a Recaption the plaintif shall recover damages and the defendant shall be fined and imprisoned for his double vexation Vide F. N. B. 71. f. m. infra 181. 7. 5 In good discretion no melius inquirendum shall be awarded after office found against the King without view of some Record Co. l. 8. 169. a. 4. in Paris Stroughters case or some other pregnant matter for the King to avoid further vexation of the subject And therefore where upon a Diem clausit extremum it was found that the land was held of the Quéen Dyer 292. pl. 71. 12 Eliz. sed per quae servitia Iuratores ignorant and thereupon a melius inquirendum awarded whereby the tenure was found of a subject and all other points certainly found In this case the first office was adjudged void by the sence of 2 3 E. 6. and the rather because it should give no further occasion of vexing the subject for that the usual course was upon a double Ignoramus to adjudge a tenure for the King in Capite 181 Pendente Lite nihil innovetur Quarâ— Impedâ—t 1 At the Common Law Co. Inst part 1. 344. b. 3. if hanging a Quare Impedit against the Ordinary for refusing the Patrons Clerk and before the Church were full the Patron had brought a Quare Impedit against the Bishop and hanging the sute the Bishop had admitted and instituted a Clerk at the presentation of another In this case if judgement were given for the Patron against the Bishop the Patron might have had a writ to the Bishop and removed the Incumbent that came in pendente lite by usurpation for pendente lite nihil innovetur And therefore at the Common Law it was good policy to bring the Quare Impedit against the Bishop as spéedily as might be Co. l. 115. b. Foliambs case F.N.B. 60 a. 2 In Real actions depending as Formedon dum fuit infra aetatem Estrepment writ of right or the like the demandant shall have a writ of Estrepment to inhibit the tenant from committing waste or estrepment hanging the sute the like writ also may be had after judgement and before execution Vide the Statute of Glocester 6 E. 1. cap. 13. It lyeth also in an action of waste and the words of the writ are Tibi praecipimus quod ad messuagium praed personaliter accedens totaliter ordinari facias quod vastum seu estrepamentum de eodem messuagio contra formam Statuti praedict non fait pendente placito praed indiscusso Co. l. 6. 29. b. 3. 3 In Dyer 339. 17 Eliz. A presentation obtained of the Queen Presentation hanging a Quare Impedit in deceit of the Queen was adjudged void In Greens case F. N. B. 20. c. 4 In a writ of Error after errors assigned and scire facias awarded against the defendant upon such assignment Error the plaintif shall not assign any error in fact as to allege that the plaintif in the other action was dead at the time of the judgement or before the judgement or the like And when the plaintif may assign errors in fact he shall assign but one error of that kind but he may assign as many errors as appear in the record because this shall be tried by the Iustices in Court but that by a Iury which innovation will much delay and prejudice
Hob. 78. Saint-Iohn Saint-Iohn 22 In debt by Saint-John against Saint-John Bailiff of Stockbridge upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. 15. for not returning him Burgess of that Town to the then intended Parliament And where the Statute saith that the Sherif shall send his precept to the Maior and if there be no Maior then to the Bailif the plaintif declared that the Sherif had made his precept to the Bailif without averring that there was no Maior And after a verdict for the plaintif this was moved in arrest of Iudgement But the Court was of opinion clearly that it shall be presumed there was no Maior except it be shewed and if there were it ought to be shewed on the other part 191 Ad ea quae frequentius accidunt Jura adaptantur Co. Inst part l. 238. a. 2. 1 It is said Descent a Toll entry that Abators and Intruders are out of the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 33. which gives the disseisee five years to prevent a descent c. because that Statute is penal and extends only to a disseisor who is only named in it And the reason why he only was therein named and not the Abator or Intrudor was because disseisin was the most common mischief Et ad ea quae frequentius accidunt c. Co. ibid. 295. a. 1. 2 In times past wager of Law was accounted a good trial in an action of debt without specialty because the Law presumed Wager of Law that no man would forswear himself for any worldly thing But of later times mens Consciences are grown so large especially in this case passing with impunity that the plaintif now dare not many times adventure the debt upon the defendants oath by bringing an action of debt but rather chuseth to bring an action upon the case upon his promise wherein he cannot wage his Law Co. l. 5. 83. b. in the case of Market overt Popham 84. 11. 3 The proper and most usual place for selling plate in London or any other Market overt is a Goldsmiths shop Market overt because such commodities use to be sold there and not in a Scriveners shop or the like And therefore if stoln Plate be sold in a Scriveners shop although it be openly and upon the market day it shall not alter the property but the party shall have restitution It is otherwise if it be sold openly in a Goldsmiths Shop c. Vide Max. 186. pl. 32. 134. 4. Co. l. 5. 127. b. 1. Palmers case 4 Guardian in Knight-service shall have the single value of the mariage without tender Valore maritagii And yet the words of the writ de valore maritagii are Quare cum Maritagium praed B. ad ipsum A. pertineat eo quod praed B. terram suam de eo tenuit per servitium militare idem A. praed B. dum fuit infra aetatem c. compotens maritagium absque disparagatione c. saepius obtulerit c. But the reason thereof is for that writs are most commonly framed according to that which doth most usually fall out alwayes in this case supposing that a tender is made because for the most part it so happens to be And therefore whereas the Rule is Ad ea quae frequentius accidunt Iura adaptantur it may in like manner be said Ad ea quae frequentius accidunt rescripta sive brevia adaptantur And in other cases a special case shall have an usual writ and a special Count. Co. l. 6 45. l. 3 in Higgins case 5 In 17 E. 3. 24. In debt upon an obligation of 20 l. Iudgement was obtained before the Maior of Newcastle Obligation not to be cancelled after Judgement and execution had thereupon and because the obligation was not cancelled which after judgment had was the usual course in those dayes the plaintif had judgement in another action upon the same obligation and the defendant upon pleading the first Iudgement could not be relieved because it was imputed to his folly that he did not procure the obligation to be cancelled upon the first Iudgement which was the ordinary usage of the Iudges at and about that time because men in antient time after a judgement obtained were apt to be quiet and to rest contented therewith without bringing writs of Error or Attaints which then were very rare especially writs of Error But now of later time men growing more contentious and not satisfied with any trial or judgement but being apt upon every such trial or judgement to bring a writ of Error or Attaint the Iudges have thought it dangerous to order the deed to be cancelled either where the plaintif recovers or where he is barred by judgement for in both cases the judgement may be reversed by Error or Attaint And therefore the reason or cause of the Iudgement in 17 E. 3. being now changed there is now no question but at this day judgement and execution upon an obligation is a good barr in a new action thereupon albeit the obligation be not cancelled Statute of wills 6 If there be Grandfather Father and divers Sons Co. l. 6. 77. a. 2. in Sir Geo. Cursons case and the Grandfather in the life of the Father convey his lands to any of the Sons this is out of the Statute of 32 H. 8. 1. of Wills for the words of the Statute are for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children c. and therefore because the Fathers children are none of the Grandfathers children such a conveyance is out of that Statute But the makers of that Act framed it according to that which was most vulgar and usual and that was for the father to dispose to his children and Ad ea quae frequentius accidunt c. Presentation 7 If a man present to an Advowson and after the Parson resigns F.N.B. 31. h. or is deposed and the Patron presents again and is disturbed he shall have an Assise of Darrein presentment and the form of the writ shall be Quis Advocatus tempore pacis praesentavit ultimam personam quae mortua est ad ecclesiam c. Albeit he resigned and is in full life Also the form of the writ is to suppose that the defendant did deforce him out of the Advowson and yet by his Count he shall declare that he or his ancestor presented last to the Advowson by which he supposeth that he is in possession of the Advowson and yet this good for ad ea quae frequentius accidunt c. Nomination 8 If a man hath the nomination to an Advowson F.N.B. 33. b. c. and another hath the presentation if he name his Clerk and he that ought to present present another Clerk he that had the nomination shall have a Quare impedit and the writ shall be Quod permittat ipsum praesentare c. And in his Count he shall declare the special matter and
all the lands belonging to Towns and Boroughs not incorporat to defray the Common Taxes of the Town or to repair the Highwayes or the Church or for sustenance of the poor of the parish or to support other common charges of the parish are conveyed to divers Inhabitants of the parish their heirs in trust to imploy the profits therof to such good uses such good uses albeit prima facie they séem to be within the letter of that Act were never made void by that Statute and it is a thing dishonorable to the Law of the Land to make good uses void And it appears by a case reported by Serjeant Benlowes that it was held in the Common pleas in 5 6. E. 6. that a feoffment to the use of poor people was not within that Act of 23 H. 8. 10. Office 4 In Alton Woods case in the 1. Rep. Exception was taken to an office virtute officii returned into the Chancery for it was said Co. l. 1. 42. b. in Alton Woods case that it ought to have been returned into the Exchequer but upon the view of infinite presidents of offices found before the Escheator virtute officii and returned into the Chancery it was disallowed per totam Curiam Perpetuities 5 In the argument of Corbets case in the 1 Rep. Iustice Glanvile said that betwixt the making of the Statute of 13 E. 1. de donis Co l. 1. 87. b. 4. Corbets case c. 27 H. 8. such a proviso annexed to the estate tail viz. that it shall cease as if the tenant in tail were dead was never seen or heard of and therefore he concluded that it could not be done by Law And so likewise concludes Littl. fol. 23. in like manner that if any action might have been brought upon the Statute of Merton Disparagement cap. 6. De dominis qui maritaverint c. it would be intended that sometimes it would have been put in ure and therefore he concludes that no action can be taken upon that Statute in as much as it was never seen or heard that any action was ever brought thereupon Elections in Corporations 6 Where in the Charters of Corporations it is said Co. l. 4. 77. b. in the case of Corporations that the choice of the Maior Bailiffs Provosts or the like Magistrates or Officers shall be chosen by all the Commonalty or Burgesses if they have been chosen time out of mind by a certain select number of the principal of the Commonalty or Burgesses commonly called the Common Councel or by such like name and not in general by all the Commonalty or Burgesses nor by so many of them as will come to the election such antient and usual elections are good and well warranted by their Charters and by the Law also for in every of their Charters they have power given them to make Laws Ordinances and Constitutions for the better government of their Cities Boroughs c. by force whereof and to avoid popular confusion if they by their common assent do constitute and ordain that the Maior Bailifs or other principal officers shall be chosen by a certain select number of the principal of the Commonalty or Burgesses as aforesaid and prescribe also how such select number shall be chosen such Ordinance and Constitution was resolved in 40 41 Eliz. to be good and allowable and to agree with the Law and their Charters for avoiding of Popular discord and confusion And albeit such an Ordinance or constitution cannot be now produced yet it shall be presumed in respect of such a special manner of antient and continual election which cannot begin without common consent that at first such an Ordinance or Constitution was made Such reverend respect the Law attributes to antient and continual allowance and usage although it begin within time of memory Mos retinenda est fidelissimae vetustatis Quae praeter consuetudinem et morem Maiorum fiunt neque placent neque recta videntur Et frequentia actus multum operatur And according to this Resolution the antient and continual usages have been in London Norwich and other antient Cities and Corporations and God defend that they should be innovated or altered for many and great inconveniences may arise thereupon all which the Law hath well prevented as appears by this Resolution Co. l. 4. 93. a. 4. Slades case 7 Albeit an action of debt lyeth upon a Contract Action upon the case yet the bargainor may have an action upon the case or an action of debt for the same at his election and one of the chiefest reasons of that resolution was for that George Kempe secondary of the Protonotaries of the Kings Bench produced an infinite number of presidents as well in the Common Pleas as in the Kings Bench in the reigns of Hen. 6. E. 4. H. 7. H. 8. by which it appeared that the plaintiffs did Count that the Defendants in Consideration of a sale to them of certain goods did promise to pay so much money c. to which presidents and judgements being of so great number and in so many successions of ages and in the several times of so many reverend Iudges the Iustices in this case gave great regard and so the Iustices in antient time and from time to time have done as well in matters of form as in deciding of doubts and questions as well at the Common Law as in the Construction of Acts of Parliament And therefore in 11 E. 3. Formedon 32. it is held that the antient forms and manner of presidents are to be maintained and observed and in 34 Ass pl. 7. that which is not according to the usage shall not be permitted and in 2 E. 3. 29. The antient form and order is to be observed Vide plus ubi supra Co. l. 5. 32. a. Pettifers case 8 Vpon fieri facias of the Goods of the Testator Devastavit the Sheriff returns nulla bona c. hereupon a writ issues to the Sheriff to enquire by Enquest whether the executors have wasted c. He returns they have and thereupon Iudgement was given of their own goods but the executors suing a writ of error de redditione executionis the execution was reversed because this course of procéeding in such case had béen taken up of later times whereas the antient course was upon the return of Nulla bona to sue a scire fac to the Sheriff to levy c. out of the Testators goods and if it should appear to him that the executors have wasted then out of their own goods for albeit it was said that the said newer course was usual in the Common Bench and more favourable than the antient course was because thereby the Devastavit shall not be returned by the Sheriff only but shall be inquired likewise by an Inquest returned and thereupon a Scire facias ought to be awarded yet judgement was given that the
juridicus Co. Inst pats 1 135. a. for that ought to be consecrated to divine service Pleas. 2 No plea shall be holden Quindena Paschae F. N. B. 17. f. because it is alwayes the Lords day but it shall be crastino quindenae Paschae Finâ—â— 3. Vpon a fine levied with proclamations according to the Statute of 4 H. 7. 24. if any of the proclamations be made on the Lords day Finches Ley pag. 7. all the proclamations are erroneous for the Iustices may not sit upon that day being a day exempt from such businesses by the Common Law for the solemnitie of it to the intent that all people may apply themselves that day to prayer and serving of God 1 El. Dyer 168 12 E. 4. 8. 3 If a writ of Scire facias out of the Common place beare Teste upon the Lords day it is errour because it is not dies dominicus in Banco Errour 4 No sale upon the Lords day shall be said a sale in Market overt to alter the propertie Sale 6 Gravius est divinam quam Temporalem laedere majestatem Co. l. 11. 29. b. Poulters case 1 Regularly Clergy a man shall by the Common law have the benefit of Clergie for any felonie Howbeit if a felon be also an Heretique Iew Sarazen or Infidel he shall not have it F. N. B. 269. b. Br. Heresie 1. Co. l. â— 58. a. Specots case 2 Heresie is an offence committed against the Majestie of God by a presumptuous oppugning of an Article of Faith or the like Heresie And therefore at the Common law this offence was punished by a more terrible and grievous mulct than any other felony whatsoever and indeed than Treason it selfe viz. by fire and faggot Howbeit to determine what is Heresie falls not within the Conusance of temporal Courts but is wholly left to the Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction for it appears by the writ de haeretico comburendo that at the Common law before an heretique could be committed to the Lay-power to be burnt he was to be convicted in a Provincial Synod before the Archbishop and his Clergie and then if he did either refuse to abjure the heresie or having abjured it upon a relapse were convicted again by such a Synod of that or any other heresie he was then delivered to the secular power to be punished by fire and faggot and no Sanctuarie could priviledge him Frowick Lect. Howbeit by the Statute of 2 H. 4. 15. any Bishop had power to do as much within his Diocesse and if the Sheriffe were present at his conviction the Bishop might deliver him to the Sheriffe to be burnt and that without the Kings writ but that Statute was repealed by 25 H. 8. cap. 14. and thereby that offence made presentable at Sheriffes Turnes and Léets and from thâ—nce to be certified to the Ordinarie which Statute the 25 H. 8. was also repealed by 1 E. 6. 12. from which time until 1 2 P. M. 6. which revived 2 H. 4. 15. an heretique was punishable at the Common Law as above is expressed but by 1 El. 1. the Statute of 1 2 P. M. was repealed and then by 1 El. the Quéenes Commissioners heretofore called the High Commission Court had power to judge of heresie but they were thereby also restrained to adjudge nothing Heresie but what was so adjudged by the holy Scriptures the four first General Councils or the Parliament with the assent of the Clergie in their Convocation Howbeit at this day the Iurisdiction of Bishops being taken away and that clause of 1 El. repealed by a later Act it séemes at present there is no law to punish that offence See more concerning heresies in the Statutes of 5 R. 2. 5. 2 H. 5. 7. 31 H. 8. 14. and 34 H. 8. 1. being all repealed by 1 E. 6. 12. See also Li. Intr. 264 and 340. Rast Ph. 319. 10. H. 7. fol. 17. and Doct. and Stud. L. 2. cap. 29. Howbeit observe that the said Statutes made in the raignes of H. 4. and H. 5. were chiefly intended against such as did then begin to discover the Pride Lucre and errors of the Church of Rome and in dirision were termed Lollards as you may read at large in the Book of Martyrs and elsewhere in divers other authors as Sleiden Brightman c. The Kings command against Law not to be obeyed by the Judges Stat. 18. E. 3. Stat. 3. 8. 3 One part of the Iudges oath is that they shall not deny right though it be by command from the King which if they breake they will be found guilty Laesae Majestatis divinae And therefore in such case they ought rather to disobey the Kings commands then thereby incurre the high displeasure of Almighty God for Gravius est divinam c. And to the end that the Iudges might be the better protected from this danger Stat. 2. E. 3. 8. the prudence of former times hath ordained divers Lawes whereby the Iustices have power to procéed Stat. 20. E. 3. 1. notwithstanding any command from the King to the contrarie no though it be under the Great or Privie Seal And therefore if the King write to the Iustices to prorogue an Assize because the defendant is in his service F. N. B. 153. h. yet the Iustices ought to procéed and not to cease for any such letter so likewise in an Assize the Bishop certifies Bastardie 29 E. 3. 14. Judgment 117 and the Kings letter is sent to the Iustices to cease because the certificate was suspicious notwithstanding which letter they tooke the Assize and afterwards albeit the Chancellor reversed the taking of the Assize in the Council because they obeyed not the letter yet notwithstanding that the Iustices gave Iudgement upon the Assize 22 F. 3. 12. Judgment 185 Also in dower the tenant was essoined and had farther day given at which the King sends a letter to excuse the tenants apperance alleadging that he was at Callis in his service Howbeit the Iustices gave no regard to it but proceeded notwithstanding that letter Nor by the Sheriff 4 The Sheriffe also 14 E. 3. Returns del Viscont 8â— who is but an Officer or Minister to the superiour Courts of Iustice ought not to desist from the due execution and return of writs directed unto him notwithstanding any command to the contrary from the King least he likewise incurre the like danger by breaking his oath And therefore we read in 14 E. 3. that N. de B. being attainted of disseisin with force An Exigi facias went forth against him to the Sheriff who returned that the King had certified him by writ that he had pardoned the trespasse and imprisonment commanding him that he should desist and that therefore he had not executed the writ whereupon saith Wilby the writ ought first to have béene sent to us that we might have commanded the Sheriffe to cease for the Sheriffe
alive he should have gone quit by the acquittal of A. because he could not be a Receiver of a felon when A. was no felon And remoto impedimento c. Vide plus ubi supra 21 Things are construed according to that which was the cause thereof Vide 31. 9. Tenant by courtesie 1 If the King give lands to a man and a woman and to the heires of their two bodies and the woman die without issue Co. Inst pars 1 21. b. 4. 9 H. 3. Dower 202. yet shall the man be tenant in taile after possibility c. But if the King give land with a woman of his kindred in frank-mariage and the woman die without issue the man in the Kings case shall not hold it for his life because the woman was the only cause of the gift but otherwise it is in the case of a common person Frankmariage 2 If lands be given to a man and a woman in special taile Co. ibid. 7 H. 4. 16. a. and they are divorced Causa praecontractus both shall hold the lands for their lives a 13 E. 3. Tit. Ass 19 E 3. Ass 83. 12. Ass 22. 19 Ass 2. But in case of frankmariage if they be so divorced the woman shall enjoy the whole land because she was the cause of the gift So if lands holden in c Plowd Carzibs case soccage be given in special tail and the Donées die the issue being within the age of 14 yeares e 17 H. 3. Gard. 146. 27 E. 3. 29. Co. ibid. 29. b. 3 Co. ibid. 42. a. 4 the next of kinne of the part of the father or of the part of the mother which can hap the custodie shall have it but in case of frank-mariage the heire of the part of the mother shall have it because she was the cause of the gift as aforesaid Co. ibidem 88. a. 4. Formedon 3 If a woman tenant in general tail maketh a feoffment in fée and taketh backe an estate in fée and take an husband and hath issue and dieth the issue may in a Formedon recover the land against the father because he is to recover by force of the estate taile as heire to his mother and is not in that case inheritable to his father the estate tail being the cause and ground of his title An Office 4 A man may have an estate for life determinable at will 3 E. 4. 8. b. as if the King doth grant an office to one at will and also grant a rent to him for the exercise of his office for terme of life this is determinable upon the determination of the office which occasioned the grant of the rent 19. 59. Co. ibid. 85. a. 2 5 If a man make a Lease for yeares of a villeine this cannot be done without déed neither can the Lessée assigne it over without déed Grant of a Villain by deed because it is derived out of a fréehold that lyeth in grant which indéed is the material cause of the grant but a wardship is an original chattel during the minority derived out of no fréehold and therefore as the Law createth without déed so may it also be assigned over without déed Co. ibi 102. a 4 9 E. 2. execut 249. 6 Vpon a judgement in debt Judgement execution the Plaintiffe shall not have execution but onely of that land which the defendant had at the time of the judgement because the action was brought in respect of the person and not in respect of the land But if an action of debt be brought against the heire and he alieneth hanging the writ yet shall the land which he had at the time of the Original purchased be charged for that the action was brought against the heire in respect of the land Co. bid 102. b. 1. 22 Ass Pl. 32. 7 If a man be nonsuit the land onely Amerciament Issues of Jurors which he had at the time of the amerciament assessed shall be charged and not that which he had at the finding of the pledges for the amerciament is not in respect of the land but for his want of prosecution which was a default in his person But the issues of a Iuror shall be levied upon the feoffee albeit they were not lost before the feoffment because he was returned and sworn in respect of the land 8 A tenure of the King in Capite Tenure in gross is said to be a tenure of the King a Bract. f. 87 as of his Crown that is as he is King c Co. ibid. 108 a. 4. ubi Vide praedict Author And therefâ—râ— if one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor c. and this Seigniory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of treason he holdeth of the pâ—rson of the King but not in Capite because the original tenure was not created by the King Vide infra M. 25. ca. 10. Co. ibid. 158. a. 3. 15 H. 7. 9. 14 H. 7. 31. 18 E. 4. 3. 9 If the cause of challenge alleaged by the Plaintiff against the Sheriff be pâ—rtiality to either party Challenge and processe be once awarded for such partiality though there be a new Sheriff yet processe shall never be awarded to him but to the Coroners and therefore in that case the entry is Ita quòd Vicecomes se non intromittat But if the cause of Challenge be for that the Sheriff was tenant to either party or the like in that case the processe shall be directed to the new Sheriff and not to the Coroners Co. ibid. 161. a. 2. 44 E. 3. 20. 6 R. 2. Refc 11 11 H. 7. 4. 21 H 7. 40. 34 H. 6. 18. 16 E. 4. 10. Co. l. 9. fol. 22. Case of Avowry Co. ibid. 169. b. 2. 15 H. 7. 14. 29 Ass 23. 29 E. 3. 9. b. 10 If the Lord come to distreine cattle Distress which he séeth then within his fée and the tenant or any other to prevent the Lord to distreine driâ—es the cattle out of the Lords fée into some other pâ—ace not within his fée yet may the Lord freshly follow and distreine the cattle and the tenant cannot make rescous But if the Lord comming to distreine had no view of the cattle within his fée though the â—enant drive them off purposely or if the câ—ttle of themselâ—es after the view goe out of the fée or if the tenant after the view remove them for any other cause then to prevent the Lord of his distresse then cannot the Lord distrein them out of his fée and if he doth the tenant may make rescous 11 If there be thrée Coparceners and they make partition Rent in Coparcenary and one of them grant 20 s. per annum out of her part to her two sisters and their heires for egaltie of partition the grantées are not joynt-tenants of this rent but
Parson in the same plight condition that he was in upon his first presentation notwithstanding the presentment of the other by the Defendant c. â—nferiour Courts 30 When a writ of right is directed to the Lord of a Mannor Co. l. 6. 11. a. Jentlemans case or his Bayliffs or a Iusticies or other Vicontiel Writs are directed to the Sheriffe c. that shall not change the nature or jurisdiction of those Courts as to make the Lord or Sheriffe to whom those Writs are directed to be Iudges of those Courts respectively which were not so before but the Sutors do still remaine Iudges thereof Neither yet shall the direction of those Writs to the Lord or Sheriffe as aforesaid albeit they are in themselves matter of Record constitute the Lord or Sheriffe to be Iudges of Record or a Court Baron Hundred Court or County Court to be Courts of Record For upon a Iudgment given in any of those Courts a writ of False judgement lies and not a writ of Errour c. No change by â—emise of the â—ing 31 When the King demises his Crown to the next Successor Co. lib. 7. 29. b. 4. Discontinuance of processe per mort de la Roygne upon the general resummons by the Kings writ which begins thus Mandamus vobis quod ad sectam nostram animumque ligeorum populi nostri c. the originall and issue if any be joyned is revived for that is a full record and ought to be entred it is otherwise of the processe before issue joyned voucher garnishment c. yet they shall be also revived upon a special writ reciting all the special procéeding And it appeares by the booke of Entries tit Reattachment 499. that if the Issue be joyned and the Iury returned and a day given for tryall before which day the King dies yet by special resummons all shall be revived for the Iury was returned of record and the record thereof was made full and perfect c. Co. lib. 11. 64. a. 2. Doctor Fosters case 32 It is ordained by the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. Statutes for going to Church That every person shall resort to their Parish Church or upon let thereof to some other every Sunday and Holiday c. And by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. That every person not repairing to Church according to 1 Eliz. 2. being thereof lawfully convict shall forfeit twenty pound for every moneth they so make default and that of the forfeitures aforesaid the Queen c. shall have the two third parts viz. the one to her owne use the other for reliefe of the poore c. and the other third part the prosecutor shall and may recover by action of debt c. And by the Statute of the 29 Eliz. cap. 6. it is enacted That every such offender once convicted shall afterwards in Easter and Michaelmas Termes pay unto the Exchequer twenty pound for every moneths absence from Church c. and if default be thereof made c. the Queens Majestie c. shall and may by processe out of the Exchequer seize all the offenders goods and two parts of his lands c. And lastly by the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. It is ordained c. that for the more speedy recovering c. of the forfeitures c. payable to the Queen c. by vertue of this Act and of 23 Eliz. 1. all and every such forfeitures c. shall be recovered c. by action of debt c. in the Kings Bench the Common Pleas or Exchequer as other debts may be recovered c. Here albeit the Statutes of the 29 and 35. séems to alter the law of the 23. in respect of part of the penalty given to the prosecutor by the 23. and being all of it mentioned as given to the Quéen in the other two subsequent Acts Yet the Act of the 23. remains in full force according to the tenour of the same notwithstanding the said subsequent Acts because those two Acts do not give the penalty to any new person but to the same person to whom the Statute of the 23. giveth it viz. to the Quéen c. and they are but acts of addition especially that of the 35. to give a more speedy remedy than was given by that of the 23. c. As in a Writ of Mesne the processe at the Common Law was Distresse infinite and although the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 9. gives a more speedy processe and in the end a Forejudger yet the Plaintiff may take which processe he will either at the Common Law or upon the said Statute because both are in the affirmative Vide ibid. many authorities accordant c. Co. ibid. 4. 33 In many cases the designation of one person in a late Act of Parliament Grant of Ward shall not exclude another person which was authorized to do the same thing by an Act precedent It is provided by the Statute of the 8 H. 6. cap. 16. that after office found c. he which found himselfe grieved might within the moneth after traverse and to take the lands and tenements to farm and that then the Chancellour Treasurer and other Officer shall demise unto him to farme untill c. Vide 13 E. 4. 8. And now by the Statute of the 1 H. 8. cap. 16. he hath liberty by the space of three moneths And after the Statute of the 32 H. 8. cap. 40. gives authority to the Master of the Wards with the advice of one of the Council to make a lease of the Wards lands or of an Idiots during the time that they shall remain in the Kings hands Here albeit the last designes another person yet doth it not utterly take away the first For if before any lease made by the Master of the Wards the Chancellour and Treasurer make one according to the Statute of 8 H. 6. then cannot the said Master demise the lands So also if the Master grant them first to another the Chancellour Treasurer c. cannot demise them to the party grieved as Stanford holds Praer fol. 69. a. b. where he mentioneth the rule Leges posteriores prioâ—es contrarias abrogant In 43 Ass Pl. 9. the Statute of 13 E. 3. de Mercatoribus which gives assise to the Tenant by Statute Merchant taketh not away the Assize which the Tenant of the Franktenement had before but both may well stand together So in 33 H. 8. Dyer 50. if it should be enacted that the youngest son should have an appeale of the death of his father that would not exclude the eldest son of his fuit because there are no words of restraint c. â—ncient Deâ—esne 34 In a writ of right Close if the writ of the Demandant abate F.N.B. 19. d. and thereupon he brings a writ of false judgement in the Common Pleas and there the judgement being reâ—ersed the writ is awarded good then shall the Demandant hold
against two Administrators upon a lease made to their Testator the Defendants plead that before the rent arrere The like one of them had assigned all his interest to J. S. of which the Plaintiff had notice and accepted the rent by the hands of the Assignee due since the assignement and before this rent now demanded was due Here upon the demurrer of the Plaintiff the judgement passed against him because the privity of the contract was determined by the death of the Lessée and for that after the assignment made by the Administrator debt lyeth not for rent due after such assignment See Dyer 4. b. 1 c. â—ebâ—â—ter 99 C. being possest of a Mease with the appurtenances for 30 years Co. l. 4. 52. a. 3. in Rawlins case demised all his interest therein to R. and after C. having departed with his whole interest in the Mease by Indenture demised a Stable belonging to the same unto W. for six years And then R. re-demiseth the whole Mease with the appurtenances to C. for 21 years In this case if W. be impleaded for the Stable by C. W. shall rebutt and maintain the lease of the Stable for six years against C. by way of conclusion because all parties and privies in estate or interest are bound by Estoppels Warranty and condition imâ—lied in exâ—hange and â—â—itition 100 The warranty which is tacite implyed in every exchange Co. l. 4. 121. b. 1. in Bastards case runs onely in privity For none shall vouch by force thereof but onely such as are parties to the exchange or their heirs and no Assignée Howbeit an Assignée may rebutt by force thereof albeit the exchange be without déed as appears 3 E. 3. tit Form 44. 2 E. 2. Qui in vita 16. There is the same law also in case of partition and as it is in case of warranty so it is also in case of the condition which the Law doth also imply upon every exchange And therefore if A. exchange with B. and B. alien to C. who is evicted by title paramount In this case C. shall not enter upon the other for as the warranty so also the condition runneth in privity to such â—nely as are parties to the exchange and to their heirs and doth not extend to the Assignée So likewise none shall have a Contra formam feoffementi but the Feoffée or his heirs Howbeit the Assignée may rebutt Vide F. N. B. 163. c. 22 H. 6. 50 b. 30 H. 6 7. a. 10 H. 7. n. e. but in the same case if the title of A. who aliened not be evicted he shall enter into the land which he gave in exchange albeit B. had aliened it over c. Vide suprà 18. 78. Joyntenants â—emise at will 101 If two Ioyntenants make a lease at will rendring rent Co. l. 5. 10. b. Hensteads case and one of them dies all survives to the other and the Lessée continues his possession Here the survivor shall have an action for the whole rent in respect of the privity c. Fuit dit Grantees preâ—â—ntment to 〈◊〉 avoydance â—od seisin for 〈◊〉 Grantor 102 A man seised of an Advowson in fée Co. l. 5. 97. b. 4. The Countesse of Northumberlands case grants the next avoydance to another the Incumbent dies the Grantée presents Here albeit the Grantor nor his Ancestors or those whose estate he hath ever presented yet this presentment of the Grantée shall be adjudged sufficient seisin in the Grantor and his heirs and shall serve to make title in a Quare Impedit And this seems to be in respect of the privity between the Grantor and the Grantee for that the Grantee presents in the right and title of the Grantor c. And therefore if the presentment be alledged in the Lessor or Donor and also in the Lessee or Donee this is not double for the presentment of the Lessee or Donee is the presentment of the Donor or Lessor and the presentment of the Lessor or Donor is onely traversable So also if the Grantee for years of a Seigniory or a Guardian happen the seisin of the services this shall be good seisin for him in the reversion And with this agrees F. N. B. 179. f. 45 E. 3. 26. 11 E. 3. Tit. Ass 86. â—ord paraâ—â—unt may â—arge tenant â—â—avail 103 At the Common Law the Lord was not compellable to take his rent of any other then of him who was his immediate Tenant in privity Co. l. 6. 58. a. 2. in Bredimanâ— case and therefore at the Common Law the Lord paramount was not compellable to accept his rent by the hands of the Tenant paraâ—ail or by the hands of a Tenant for life where the reversion was over And that well appears by the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 9. Capitalis Dominus fervitia consuetudines sibi debetas renuebat accipere permanus alterius quà m per manus proximi tenentis suis sic tenentes in dominico amiserunt proficua tenementorum suorum Non habeat capitalis dominus potestatem distringendi tenentes in dominico dum praedictus tenens offerat ei servitia debita consueta Co. l. 7. 7. b. 3. The Earl of Bedfords case 104 If Tenant in tail of lands holden by Knight-service make leases not warranted by the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 28. and die Guardian 〈◊〉 Bishop may 〈◊〉 evict voidaâ—â—â— estates his heir within age the Guardian in privity and right of the heir in tail shall avoyd those leases during the time that the heir is in Ward So also if a Bishop make a lease for years not warranted by the Statute so that the lease is voydable by the Successor and dies the King shall avoyd that lease during the vacation of the Bishoprick viz. in privity and right of the same Bishoprick for that the Guardian in the one case and the King in the other are not strangers but privies in right Howbeit in the case of the Guardian he shall avoyd the lease as to his own interest onely but shall not prejudice the heir of his election at his full age to confirm the same leases if he please For Custos statum haeredis in custodia sua existentis meliorem non deteriorem facere potest So likewise if the heir within age before the entry of the Guardian or the Ancestor being within age make a lease for years rendring rent the Guardian may enter in privity and right of the heir and shall avoyd the lease Howbeit the Lord by escheat shall not avoid voydable estates made by his Tenant who was an Infant for regularly none shall avoid voydable estates by reason of infancy but onely such as are parties or privies viz. the Infant himself or his heirs being privies in bloud and in the case abovesaid the Guardian as privy in right c. Co. l. 7. 13. a. 1. in Englefeilds case 105 Thomas Duke of Norfolk Power 〈◊〉
Feme shall be admeasured Howbeit hée may well assigne her lesse Omne majus c. Pl. Co. 83. a. 2. Partridges case Co. Inst pars 1. 369. a. 4. 41 Where the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 9. Pretenced title c. prohibiteth the buying or selling of any pretenced rights or titles in the plural number yet the buying or selling of any one right or title is also prohibited by the same Statute for the singular is included in the plural Pl. Co. 86. b. 3. per Hales Partridges case Vide suprà 12. Pl. Co. 86. a. 4. in Partridges case per Hales 42 The Statute of the 1 H. 5. cap. 3. recites Entry into land that some people do of late use to forge divers false deeds and muniments c. And therefore it ordaines that the party so grieved may have his suit in that case c. Here that Statute speaks of false déeds c. in the plural number yet if a man forge one false déed onely he shall incurre the penalty of that Statute So likewise the Statute of 5 R. 2. cap. 7. forbids that none shall make entry into any lands or tenements except in case where entry is given by the Law Yet if one enter onely into one tenement he shall be punished notwithstanding that Statute is in the plural number for the plural number contains in it the singular number and more c. Pl. Co. 87. a. 3. Partridges case 43 Where the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 9. prohibits the buying Pretenced 〈◊〉 to a lease c. of any pretenced rights c. a lease for years is prohibited as well as an estate in fée in taile or for life for under the word any the lesse estate shall be conteined in the greater So also the Statute of 23 H. 6. Sheriffs cap. 10. prohibits that no Sheriff shall let to farme in any manner his County c. whereby he is restrained to let to farme any part of his County because the lesse is contained in the greater c. Co. l. 5 pars 1. 34. b. 4. in the K. Ecclesiastical law 44 It was adjudged in the Court of Common Pleas by Dyer Weston Ecclesiastical persons may resign to the King and the whole Court that a Deane or any other Ecclesiastical person may resigne to the King as divers did to King E. 6. because the King hath the authority of the supream Ordinary For Cui licet quod majus est non debet quod minus est non licere Co. Inst pars 1 129. a. 2 45 If the King by his prerogative may make one An alien maâ—denizen that is an alien born an absolute Denizen viz. Quòd ille in omnibus tractetur reputetur habeatur teneatur gubernetur tanquam ligens noster infra dictum regnum nostrum Angliae orâ—undus c. à fortiori he may grant to such an Alien a particular denization viz. Quòd in quibusdam curiis suis Angliae audiatur ut Anglus quod non repellatur per illam exceptionem quòd sit Alienigena natus in partibus transmarinis c. to enable him to sue onely or may grant him a denization sub conditione c. Devise for Executors â—hall sell 46 If a man deviseth his land to A. for life Co. ib. 112. b. 3. and that after his decease it shall be sold by his Executors generally and make thrée or four Executors and during the life of A. one of the Executors dieth and then A. dieth the other two or thrée Executors may sell for the greater number includes the lesse and the plural number of Executors still remains whereby the words of the Will are also satisfied It is otherwise if before the Statute of 21 H. 8. 4. he had made but two Executors and one had died or if he had made I. S. I. N. and I. D. his Executors by name and one of them had died for then the words of the Will had not béen satisfied which in such case giving but a bare power must be thereby observed so also if he had devised it to be sold by his sons in law being thrée and one dies the other two might have sold it but not if there had béen onely two and one die or refuse before sale Vide Rule 110. 21. Isabel Goodcheaps case 49 E. 3. Arbitrament 47 The submission to an award betwixt A. and B. was general Co. l. 8 98. a. 2. Baspoles case viz. of all actions c. and the award was that A. should pay B. 20 pound And in this case it was objected that it did not appeare that the matter of the arbitrament was the matter onely that was betwixt them because the submission was general of all actions demands c. And therefore if the arbitrament were not made of all the matters in controversie the Award was void But the Award was adjudged good because when the submission is general of all actions c. Generale nihil certi implicat and therefore it stands well with the generality of the words that there was but one cause depending in controversie betwixt them And Omne majus continet in se minus But it is otherwise where the submission is of certain things in special c. Waste 48 The Lessée covenants to cut no trées Dyer 115. b. â—7 1 2 P. M. and gives bond to perform covenants the Lessée cuts ten trées and the Lessor sues him upon the bond and assignes for breach the cutting of twenty trées he pleads that he did not cut twenty trées upon which they are at issue and the Iury found that he cut onely ten yet judgement was given for the Plaintiffe for the other tenne trées were but surplusage and omne majus c. Lease by a â—rebend 49 A Prebend of Sarum makes a lease for seventy years the Bishop Dyer 338. 43. 17 Eliz. Deane and Chapter confirm the Bishop being Patron and Ordinary for 50 years and no more In this case the demise and all conteined in the Indenture was adjudged good for 50 years 60 Additio probat minoritatem â—e is Fee-â—â—mple 1 When you finde it said in any Book Co. Inst pars 1. 189. a. 3. that a man is seised in fée without saying more it shall be understood in Fée-simple and not in Fée-taile unlesse there be but unto it such an Addition Fee-taile c. And therefore in Heraldry the younger sonnes give the differences And in France by Monsieur without any addition or other title is to be understood the Kings onely brother and by Madame without more the Kings onely sister and therefore they are said in French to be Monsieur sans queüe and Madame sans queüe viz. without any other addition or title But if there be in France any occasion of naming any other Lord or Lady they are always named with their proper and peculiar title as Monsieur de
62 yeares without impeachment of wast And after A. le ts to B the Mannor for 30 yeares from the expiration of the former ease of 30 yeares the first 30 yeares expire the Lessée cut the trees the Lessor brings an Action of wast And Iudgement was given for the Plaintife for by the accept of the future Lease the lease for 62 yeares was presently and actually surrendred because it could not be surrendred in part and in force for the residue of the term and the Lessée by such acceptance affirmed the Lessor to have ability to make a new lease which he could not do so long as the first lease stood in force so likewise if the Lessee for 20 yeares accept a lease for three yeares to begin ten yeares after this is a present surrender of the whole term for the last ten yeares cannot be surrendred and the first ten still remain in esse because that would make fractions of the term which is in its nature intire Neither can he that hath a lease for 20 yeares surrender the last ten yeares by any expresse surrender saving unto him the first ten yeares c. Co. lib. 5. 11. b. 3. 56. a. 1. Knights Case 54 Two Houses are let to one man An intire condition the one for 4 l. Rent per annum the other for 20 s. per annum with proviso that if the said Rent of 5. l. be behind in part or in all then the Lessor shall re-enter these Houses afterwards escheate to the King who after grants that upon which the â—0 s per annum is reserved to I. S. the Rent thereof is arreare In this case the Patentée cannot enter for the Condition broken because albeit the Rents were severall yet the Condition was intire by the expresse reservation and gives in intire re-entry into all for default of payment of any part of the Rent and therefore by the severance of any part of the reversion all the condition as to all common persons is destroyed Howbeit the whole condition remaines intirely in the King with the reversion of the other House and that is in respect of his prerogative c. â—he whole â—â—rm one inâ—â—â—e day 55 The Lessée for yeares brings an ejectione firme Co. lib. 5. 74. b. 1. in Wymarks Case the Defendant saith that before the lease the Lessor bargained and sold to him in Fée by indenture inrolled within six moneths whereby he was seised untill diseised by the Lessor who let the land c. The Plaintife pleades that the bargaine c. was upon Condition which was broken c. the Defendant demurres and sheweth cause according to the Statute viz. Because the Plaintiff shewed not forth the Indenture of the Condition And in this case judgement was given for the Plaintife because when any deed is shewed in Court the deed by judgement of Law remaines in Court all the term in which it is shewed but at the end of the term if the deed be not denied then the Law adjudgeth it in the Custodie of the Partie to whom it belongs for all the term in Law is but one day and therefore the deed shall be intended to remaine in Court all the terme in which it is shewed for the term in that case is Intire and will admit of no fractions And so by consequent the Plaintife may in such case take advantage of the Condition comprised in the deed shewed forth by the Defendant himselfe so he do it in the same term as afore-said c. â—erdict and â—amages inâ—â—â—e 56 Goods were cast super arenas aqua salsa minimè coopertas Co. l. 5. 108. a. 3. in Sir Henry Constables Case Manerii de B. infrà fluxum refluxum maris and another parcell were floting super aquas maris refluent ex arenis ejusdem Manerii infrà fluxum c. The Patentée of the Mannor and Fée of Holdernesse in Com. Ebor. brings an Action of Trespasse against him that seised them to the use of the Lord Admiral And the Iurie assessed damages intirely for all In this case judgement was given against the Plaintife because the Goods so floting upon the Waters called Flotsam did not of right belong to him but to the Lord Admiral And therefore the Verdict being intire viz. given for both and so the damages of the wrecke being thereby made un-severable from those of the Flotsam the Plaintife could take nothing by his wort So in Trespasse 21 H. 7. 34. b. the Defendant justifies for part and Pleads not guilty for the residue the Iury inquire of one of the things and tax damages intirely here the whole Court against Fineux adjudged it not good 22 E. Dier 369. accord M. 14 15 El. in Trespas by Pooly for his Servant beaten and his Close broken and said not per quod servitium amisit upon non culp the Iury assessed damages intirely and it was adjudged not good See 9 H. 7. 3. M. 30 31 El. inter Moore Bedle in Assumpsit where the Plaintiff layes two breaches whereof one was insufficient upon non assumpsit the Iury assessed damages intirely And in this case there were two resolutions 1 It shall be intended that they gave damages for both 2 Because the Plaintifs had no cause for one of the allegations â—â—tire serviâ—â— the judgement was to be reversed in the Exchequer Chamber c. 57 Concerning intire Services Co. lib. 6. 1. in Bruertons Case and where they may be apportioned â—arranty inâ—â—â—e and where not see Bruertons Case per tout Co. l. 6. 1. and John Talbots Case in the 8. Rep. fol. 108. 58 Warrantie is an Intire thing which will not suffer partition but shall always either intirely remaine or be intirely annulled Co. lib. 6. 126. Morrices Case and therefore if there be two Ioyntenants with Warrantie and petition is made between them by judgement in a writ de partitione facienda by force of the Statute of 31 H. 8. cap. 1. in this case the Warrantie shall remaine to each of them intirely because upon the Kings writ they are compellable by the Statute unto which every one is Partie to make partition and so the Partie persuing his remedie according to the Act shall not receive any prejudice by the operation of the same Act unto which every one is partie but if they had made partition by deed by consent since the said Act albeit they were compellable by writ to make partition yet in as much as they did not pursue the Statute to make partition by writ for that cause such partition remaines as it was before at the Common Law and by consequent the Warrantie is gone as it was agréed in 29 El. 3. tit Garr because the Warrantie is indivisible and cannot be parted as the Land may Co. lib. 6. 23. The Marqu of Winchesters Case 59 The Marcquesse of Winchester by will as it was supposed A will for Lands and Testament 〈◊〉
157. 12. 9. Eliz. the Plaintiff counts that he was bound with the Defendant as his surety and at his request to a stranger by Bill Obligatory and that at the day assigned the Creditor was not paid by the Defendant whereupon at the Creditors Suit the Plaintiff was arrested and imprisoned c. And the Defendant cognovit Actionem whereupon Iudgement was given quòd acquieteâ— the Plaintiff versus the Creditor of the sum and damages assessed by the Court c. Vide F. N. B. 137. c. â—avishment 11 The Statute of West 2. 35. Hob. 93. 7 Jac. Rot. 759 More Hussey against ravishment of Wards hath two aspects in it one civil another criminal for it provides that the Executor shall answer for the value sed non quoad poenam prisonae for Nemo pro alieno facto est puniendus It is so likewise for husband and wife For albeit the wife be onely guilty yet the husband shall answer the dammages but shall not be subject to abjuration or immediate Imprisonment which is to be perpetual Howbeit to the mediate Imprisonment viz. upon a writ of Execution for the dammages and the value of the Marriage he shall be liable as in other trespasses where the wife onely is guilty of the fact 88 The Law favoureth things done in anothers Right Co. Inst p. 1. 52. a. 2. 1 Few or no persons are disabled in Law to be private Attorneys to deliver seisin for Monks Infants Femes covert Attorney to deliver seisin Persons disabled persons attainted out-lawed excommunicated Villains Aliens c. may be Attorneys So a Feme may be an Attorney to deliver seisin to her husband and the husband to the wife and he in the remainder to the Lessée for life And the reason hereof is for that the Attorney doth nothing in his owne right but in the right of another Co. ib. 52. a. 3. 2 If Lessée for life make a déed of Feoffment Attorney to deliver seisin and a Letter of Attorney to the Lessor to make Livery and the Lessor maketh Livery accordingly notwithstanding such making of Livery he shall enter for the forfeiture because he doth it in anothers right and the Lessée for life had Fréehold whereof to make Livery It is otherwise of Lessée for years because in that Case the Fréehold being in the Lessor and not in the Lessée the Lessor cannot do it as Attorney to the Lessée c. Co. ib. a. 4. 3 If the Lessor make a déed of Feoffment Lessee for years Attorney to deliver seisin and a Letter of Attorney to the Lessée for years to make Livery and he doth it accordingly this shall not drown or extinguish his Term because he did it as a Minister to another and in anothers right And that is accounted in Iudgement of Law the act of the Feoffor and not of the Lessée neither yet doth the Feoffée claim any thing from the Lessée c. Co. ib. 4 If the tenant devise that the Lord shall sell the Land Devise and dieth and the Lord selleth it accordingly yet the Seigniory doth still remain because the Lord selleth the Land in anothers right c. Co. ib. 88. b. 4. 5 A Guardian in soccage shall not forfeit his Interest by Outlawry or attainder of Felony or Treason Guardian is Soccage because he hath nothing to his own use but onely to the use and in the right of the heir whose Guardian he is Co. ib. 112. a. 4. 10 H 7. 20. 6 If after the Statute of 1 R. 3. cap. 1. Sale by Feâ—â— to Baron and before the Statute of Vses in 27 H. 8. cap. 10. Cestuy que use had devised that his Wife should fell his Land and had made her Executrix and died she had taken another husband In that Case she might have sold the Land to her husband for she doth it in auter droit and her husband would have béen in by the Devisor c. Co. ib. 113. a. 3 7 If a man devise that his Executors shall sell his Land Devise of a Reversion tâ— be sold by eâ—ecutor In this Case the Executors have no Estate or Interest in the Land but onely a bare and naked power yet this Feoffment amounteth to an alienation to vest the Land in the Feoffée for they do it in auter droit And the Feoffée shall be in by the Devisor So likewise if a man deviseth that a Reversion or other thing that lieth in grant shall be sold by his Executors they may sell the same without Déed for the Vendée shall be in by the Devisor and not by the Executors Causa qua suprà Co. ib. 117. a. 2 124. a. 4 c. 8 If a man be Lessée of a Villain for life for years or at will Villain the Villain purchaseth the lands in fée if the Lessée entreth into the lands he shall hold the Lands as a perquisite to him and his heires for ever For the Law respecteth the quality and not the quantity of his Estate But if a Bishop hath a Villein in right of his Bishoprick and he purchaseth Lands and the Bishop entreth the Bishop shall have his perquisite to him and his Successors and not to him and his heires Bishop for it came into his hands as in anothers right So if Executors have a Villein for yeares Executors and the Villein purchaseth Lands in fée and the Executors enter they shall have a fée-simple but it shall be assets in their hands For they have it in right of the Testator c. Villein Executor Lord Debt Trespas 9 A Villein may as Executor have an Action of debt against his Lord because it is not to recover a debt to his owne use Lit. §. 191 192 Co. ibid. 124. Finch 27. but to the use of the Testator neither yet shall the Lord take out of the possession of such Villein who is Executor the goods of the deceased because he is possessed of them in anothers right And if the Lord do take them the Villein shall maintain an Action of Trespass against him and therein recover damages against him to the use of the Testator c. for they shall be assets in his hands c. Oâ—t-lawry no â—is-ability 10 If an Executor or Administrator sueth an Action Co. ibid. 128 a. 3 Finch 27 out-lawry in the Plaintiffe shall not dis-able him because the sute is in auter droit viz. In the right of the Testator and not in his owne right And for the same a Mayor and Cominalty shall have no Action though the Mayor be out-lawed c. So it is also of one excommunicated â—bbot c. â—lien 11 An Abbot Prior or Prioresse Alien shall have Actions reall Co. ibid. a. 4. b. 1. personal or mixt for any thing concerning the possessions or goods of his Monastery here in England although he be an Alien borne
forma is material So if a feofment be pleaded by déed and it is traversed absque hoc quod feoffavit modo forma upon this collateral Issue modo forma are so essential that the Iury cannot find a feofment without déed 8 Lord and Tenant by fealty onely and the Lord distraines the Tenant for Rent Litt. §. 484. Modo forma Lord and Tâ—nant the Tenant brings an Action of Trespass against the Lord for his cattle so taken and the Lord pleads that the Tenant holds of him by fealty and certain Rent and for the Rent he distrained c. And the Tenant saith that he holds not of him modo forma as he supposeth and thereupon they are at Issue and it is found by Verdict that he holds of him per fidelitatem tantum In this Case the writ shall abate and yet he held not of the Lord in manner as the Lord had alleadged But the matter of the Issue being found viz that the Tenant holds of him that sufficeth to abate the writ albeit the Lord distraine the Tenant for other services then are due Co. ib. 282. a. 1. 9 If A. be appealed or indicted of Murder Modo forma Murder Manslaughter viz. that he of malice prepensed killed B. A. pleads that he is not guilty modo forma yet the Iury may find the Defendant guilty of man-slaughter without malice prepensed because the killing of B. is the matter and malice prepensed is but a Circumstance Co. ib. a. 2. 10 In Assise of darrien presentment Darrien presentment if the Plaintiffe alleadge the avoydance of the Church by privation and the Iury find the voydance by death the Plaintiffe shall have judgement for the manner of the voydance is not the title of the Plaintiffe but the voydance is the matter c. Co. ibid. a. 3. 11 If a Guardian of an Hospital bring an Assise against the Ordinary he pleadeth Deprivation ab Ordinary as Patron that in his visitation he deprived him as Ordinary whereupon Issue is taken and it is found that he deprived him as Patron yet the Ordinary shall have judgement for the deprivation is the substance of the matter Co. ib. 282. a. 3 12 The Lessée covenants with the Lessor not to cut downe any trées c. And binds himselfe in a bond of 40 pounds for performance of covenants the Lessée cuts downe ten trées Breach of covenant the Lessor bringeth an Action of debt upon the bond and assigneth a breach that the Lessée hath cut downe 20 trées whereupon Issue is joyned and the Iury finds that the Lessée cut down ten yet judgement shall be given for the Plaintiffe For sufficient matter of the Issue is found for the Plaintiffe Litt. §. 485. Co. ibid. 282. a. 4. c. 13 In a writ of Trespass for battery or for goods caried away In actions transitory the place must not be traversed if the Defendant plead not guilty in the manner as the Plaintiffe supposeth and it is found that the Defendant is guilty in another towne or at another day then the Plaintiffe supposeth yet he shall recover For in Actions brought for things transitory the wrong being done in one towne the Plaintiffe may not onely alleadge it in another towne but also in another County and the Iurors upon not guilty pleaded are bound to find for the Plaintiffe Neither can the assault battery taking of goods c. alleadged in another County be traversed without special cause of justification which extendeth to some certain place as if a Constable of a Towne in another County arrest the body of a man that breakeeh the peace there he may traverse the County Howbeit he must not stay there but must say farther and all other places saving in the towne whereof he is Constable So it is also in an Action for taking of goods for in that Case also if the Defendant justifie for damage feasant in another County he may traverse as before But where the cause of the justification is not restrained to a certain place which is so local that it cannot be alleadged in any other towne as in the Cases before alleadged and the like then albeit the Action be brought in a forraigne County yet he must alleadge his justification in the County where the Action is brought As if a man be beaten in the County of Middelsex and he bringeth his Action in the County Buck. the Defendant cannot plead that the Plaintiffe assaulted him in the County of Middelsex c. and traverse the County but he must plead his justification in the County of Buck. for that the cause of his justification is good in any place So it is likewise in Case of Bailement of goods and other Cases for transitory things as for example In an Action upon the Case the Plaintiffe declared for speaking of slanderous words which is transitory and layd the words to be spoken in London the Defendant pleaded a concord for speaking of words in all the Counties of England saving in London and traversed the speaking of the words in London the Plaintiffe in his replication denied the concord whereupon the Defendant demurred and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe for the Court said that if the concord in that Case should not be traversed it would follow that by a new and subtile invention of pleading an ancient principle in Law that for transitory causes of Action the Plaintife might alleadge the same in what place or County he would should be subverted which ought not to be suffered And therefore the Iudges of both Courts allowed a traverse upon a traverse in that Case c. Now the ground that ruleth all these Cases is this because the Law respects more the cause of the Action which is the substance of the suit then the place where the Act was done which is but circumstance c. â—ubstance cerâ—ainely alâ—eadged conâ—yance not 14 That which is alledged by way of conveyance or inducement to the substance of the matter néed not to be so certainely alleadged Co. ib. 303. a. 4. as that which is the substance it selfe And where a matter of Record is the foundation or ground of the suit of the Plaintiffe or of the substance of the plea there it ought to be certainly and truly alleadged otherwise it is where it is but conveyance because that is but circumstance c. â—ea insufficiâ—â— 15 When a Count barre replication Co. l. 8. 133. b. 1. Turners Case c. is defective in respect of omission of some circumstance as time place c. there it may be made good by the plea of the adverse party but if it be insufficient in matter and substance it cannot be salved Co. l. 8. 120. b. D. Bouch. Case â—â—cient pleaâ—â—ngs 16 In the Raignes of E. 2. E. 1. and upwards Co. ib. 303. b. a Co-l 7 25. a in Buts Case Co. ib.
of Conduits and Water-pipes or the like So if a man have an ancient Window in his Hall and after covert the Hall to a Parler or any other use yet shall it not be Lawfull for the Neighbour at his pleasure to stop it For he may prescribe to hâ—ve a light in such a part of his House c. â—porâ—tions â—â—red yet the â—dy remaines 22 If a Corporation hath Franchises and Priviledges Co. ibid. b. 1. by grant or prescription and after they are incorporate by another name as whereas they were Bailiffs and Burgesses before now they are Mayor and Community Or Prior and Covent before and after translated to Deane and Chapter In these Cases albeit the qualities and name of their corporation is altered and charged and principally in the Case of Prior and Covent for of Regulâ—â— who are dead persons in Law they are made Secular yet the new body shall enjoy all the Franchises Priviledges and Hereditaments which the old Corporation or body Politique had either by grant or by prescription because albeit the name c. is changed yet the body which is the substance doth still remain c. 〈◊〉 of form â—dable by â— Clâ—râ—e 23 If a Count be insufficient in point of forme onely Co. l. 35. b. 1. in Playters Case which the Clerk is able to amend without the information of the Plaintiffe that error may be rectified by the Clerke by force of the Statute of 28 Eliz. cap. 14. It is otherwise if it be deficient in matter of substance As in Trespass if the Plaintiffe declare Quare clausum suum fregit pisces suos cepit c. without shewing the number or nature of the fish In this Case that omission is matter of substance and not of forme to be remedied by that Statute c. â—â—ke of the 〈◊〉 in some 〈◊〉 matter of â—nce 24 In a Writ of Error upon a recovery in wait Co. l. 5. 45. a Freemans Ca for that in reciting the Statute of Glocester the writ had destrictionem for destructionem it was adjudged that that mistake of the Clerke was matter of substance because destrictio was a Latin word which quite altered the sence of the Statute and therefore could not be helped by any Statute it had béen otherwise if it had béen matter of forme onely For at this day if the original writ want forme onely or containes false Latin or varies from the Register in matter of forme In such Case after verdict no judgement shall be stayed or reversed but if it want substance as in the Case aâ—ove said although it be onely the mistake of the Clerk yet it shall not be remedied by any Statute And therefore in a writ of partition the Iustices of the Common Pleas inserted this word oftensurus which was omitted and in a writ of Ayell they amended this word Ave and made it Avie 〈◊〉 arreare 〈◊〉 Kings 〈◊〉 25 Where the King hath right of entry for default of payment of a quarters Rent and by the office more rent is found arreare Co. l. 5. 56. b. 1 Knights Case then what the quarters rent amounts unto yet that is sufficient for the King when the Office hath matter and substance for the sole and substantial point which proves the breach of the Condition is the non-payment of the Rent or any part thereof and it is not material when the Rent was arreare for if any part thereof be arreare it suffiseth c. Co. l. 6. 47. b. 2 in Dowdales Case 26 In debt against an Executor the Iury finds assets in Regno Hyberniae and the verdict was adjudged good Assets found in any plaâ— albeit the Assets were found not onely in a Forraigne Country but in a forraigne Kingdome for the finding of assets is the substance and the place where is but sur-plussage and circumstance And therefore if an Executor have goods of the Testator in any part of the world as if the Testator were a Marchant or the like that had goods beyond Sea he shall be charged with them as Assets For the place is but circumstance c. Co. l. 8. 49. a in John Webbes Case Vid. Stat. W. 2. c 24 in 13 E. 1. 27 In ancient time Writs origiâ— used though the Case â—aâ— in circumstance when the Masters and Clarks of the Chancery were grave wise men well versed in the Lawes of the Land the first sort of them making writs in difficult Cases onely which were called Brevia Magistralia and they by reason of their profound learning called Masters of the Chancery the other making Brevia de causa and therefore called Cursitoriâ— writs were by them exactly formed without fault or error But now when such learned Clerks faile the Iudges in many Cases give allowance to ancient formes of writ and puts the partie to make a special Count and in such Case when the writ warrants the Count in substance they adjudge it sufficient although there be variance in circumstance Co. ibid 48. a. 4 For example the Original writ of Assisa ultimae praesenâ—ationis is formed in these words quis advocatus tempore pacis praesentavit ultimam personam quae mortua est This forme shall hâ—d and not be changed albeit the incumbent resigned as appeares in 18 E. 2. Tit. Assise de darreine praesentm 20. c. F. N. B. 53. h. Also the writ of Warr. Cartae is formed in these words Quòd justè c. warrantized B. unum mesuagium in D. c. unde cartam habet c. yet if he be bound to warranty by force of an exchange or by homage ancestrel the form of the writ shall not be altered Vide 9. E. 4. 49. 21 H. 6. 8. c. F. N. B. 134. Co. l. 8. 76. b. 2. in the Lord Staffords Case 28 The Law never requires circumstance Circumstaâ— not requireâ— when it 〈◊〉 subvert the substance when thereby the substance may be subverted As if the King grant Land to I. S. for life with Condition that if I. S. pay at the Exchequer such a day xx s. to the Kings use that then he shall have fée and I. S. payes the xx s. accordingly Although it be regularly true that the King by reason of the Majesty of his person cannot take or depart with any thing but by matter of Record yet in this Case I. S. shall have fée in the Land and the fée-simple shall be out of the King immediately upon the payment of the xx s. without petition monstrance de droit or any other such circumstances for if the Estate shall not vest before such circumstance then it cannot vest presently and if it vests not presently it shall never vest because if the Estate be not enlarged and therefore in such Case the fée-simple for necessities sake shall passe out of the King without any such circumstance for as is said before the Law never requires circumstance when it may
these cases he may Co. l 10. 47. b. 3 in Lampets Case 26 A. Lessée for 500 years deviseth to B. for life and after his decease the remainder to C. and the heires of his body this executory devise the remainder to C. and the heires of this body this executory devise may be released to B. but cannot be granted to a stranger it is otherwise of an interest executed Fit 2. N. B. 83. b 27 If the Lord levie aide to marry his Daughter Aide for marring c. and do afterward marry her she shall not have an action against the executors of the father for that money it is otherwise if she were not married in his life time So it is also of the sonne not made Knight c. F. N. B. 120. f 121. c 28 If a man take a feme who is indebted to an alien Baron not chargeable without reco and the feme dies before that Debt is recovered by action in that case the Baron is not chargeable It is otherwise if it were recovered living the feme c. Pl. Co. 52. a. 1. Wimb Talb. Case 29 An heir in tail that hath a Reversion An estate executed and executory div or remainder really executed in him shall not néed to plead specially how he is heir it is otherwise where it is to be executed So if Administrators bring an action of Trespasse for Goods taken out of their own possession they shall not shew the Letters of Administration Otherwise it is for Goods taken in the life of the Intestate for there the possession of the Goods were never executed in them but to be executed Also if a Lease be made for life the remainder in taile and he in the remainder is seised after the death of the Tenant for life his issue shall have a Formedon and shall declare upon the immediate Gift neither yet shall shew the Déed otherwise it is if that estate were to be executed Pl. Co. 51. a. 3. Wimb Talb. Case 9 H. 6. 23. Pl. Co. 56. b. 5. contra 30 A man deviseth land to one for life An estate vested shall remaine the remainder to the right heires male of the Devisor and to the heirs of his body begotten the Tenant for life dies and the next heir of the Devisor being a feme enters and after had a sonne And there it was holden by the best opinion that the some shall not out the feme because the sonne born after shall not take away the land before vested in the feme as heir for default of such person then in rerum natura to take the devise Co. Inst p. 1. 117. a. 3. 31 If lands be given to Villain and to the heires of his body Villain and alien tenantâ— in tail and the Lord enters and after enfranchiseth the Donée and then the Donée hath issue yet that issue shall never have remedie either by Formedon or entry to recover the Land for that it was executed in the Lord before the enfranchisment of the Donée and the Statute de Donis giveth remedy to the Issues of the Donée that have capacity and power to take and retaine such a gift c. So it is also if lands be given to an Alien and to the heires of his body upon office found the land is seised for the King afterwards the King makes the Alien a Denizen who hath issue and dieth in this Case also the King shall detaine the land against the Issue c. â— fâ—eri facias â—câ—ted shall â—d 32 Sale by the Sheriffe upon a fieri facias shall stand Co. l. 8. 76. b. 4. Mathew Manuings Case albeit the judgment afterwards reversed and the Plaintiffe in it restored to the value Dier 363. 24. 〈◊〉 original 〈◊〉 judicial â—ll abate or 〈◊〉 abate 33 There is a diversity betwixt writs real original Co. l. 10. 134 in Read and Redmans Ca. which are as things executory writs real Iudicial which Issue from the judgment being in the nature of a thing executed And therefore if 2 coperceners bring a real Action and the one is summoned and severed and after dies having issue or no Issue in this Case the writ shall abate so likewise if 2 jointenants bring an Assise or other original real Action and the one is summoned and severed and dies the writ shall abate albeit the thing in demand servive But if two coperceners bring a scire facias which is a judicial writ upon a fiue levied c. and the one copercener is summoned and severed then dies without Issue such judicial writ shall not abate And so it is also of two joyntenants Howbeit if the copercener that dies hath issue it shall abate because the right descends â—â—â—ter â—câ—â—ed 34 If lands be given to a man and the heires females of his body Co. Inst p. 1. 357. a. 2 and he maketh a feofment in fée and take backe an Estate to him and his heires and dieth having Issue a Daughter leaving his wife grossement ensuit with a Son and dieth the Daughter is remitted and albeit the Son be afterwards borne he shall not devest the remitter because it was executed â—e feme reâ—ed after â—ontinuâ—e 35 If the Baron discontinue the land of the Feme and go beyond Sea Litt. § 677. Co. Inst p. 1. 356. b. 4. and the discontinuée leases the land to the Feme for life and gives her seisin and after the Baron returnes and dis-agrées to the lease and livery of siesin made to the Feme yet in this Case she is remitted to her ancient Estate because by the lease for life and livery the remitter was executed in the Feme and the Estate for life to the Feme which wrought the remitter is vanished and whole defeated And therefore dis-agréement of the husband can devest the Estate gained by the lease which by the remitter was actually devested before 〈◊〉 plenâ—â—ty â—â—re induâ—â—n 36 A Clerk is not enabled by the Stat. of 25 E. 3. 7. Dier 1. 8. 4 H. 8. by the word possessor to plead in barre before induction for by that his possession is executed and then he is possessor and not before â—eâ—ants in â—â—mon of 〈◊〉 Advowson 37 Thrée Tenants in common 〈◊〉 an advowson make composition Dier 19. a. 194 28 H. 8. that each of them shall present by term if each of them hath once presented by his turn by vertue of the composition in a Qu. Imp. brought after amongst them it is not necessary to shew the composition because it was executed it is otherwise in Case it were not executed And such composition cannot be without writing it is otherwise of coperceners for such composition may be by parol amongst them because they are privies and as one heire and are compellable to make partition â—sâ—uy que use â—render in 〈◊〉 38 Cestuy que use after the Statute of 1
hinders a Remittâ—r and the Discontinuee is disseissed and after the Disseisor lets the Land to the Baron and Feme for life this is a Remitter to the Feme but if the Baron and Feme were of covin and consent that the Disseisin should be made then is it no Remitter to the Feme because she is then a Disseiseresse and particeps criminis Howbeit if the Baron were onely of covin and consent to the Disseisin and not the Feme in that case the Feme shall be remitted So as here covin and consent of Baron and Feme doth hinder the Remitter of the Feme Co. ibid. 357. a. 4. and so covin doth in many cases choake a meer Right and the ill manner doth many times make a good matter unlawfull Co. ibid. b. 1. Co. l. 3. 78. a. in Farmers case 11. If a Disseisor Intrudor or Abator do endow a woman that hath lawfull title of Dower this is good and shall bind him that right hath but if a woman be lawfully entitled to have Dower and she is of covin and consent that one shall disseise the Tenant of the Land against whom she may recover her lawfull Dower all which is done accordingly In this case the Tenant may lawfully enter upon her and avoid the Recovery in respect of the covin Co. ibid. b. 2. 12. In all cases The like where a man hath a rightfull and just cause of Action yet if he of covin and consent do raise up a Tenant by wrong against whom he may recover the Covin doth suffocate the right that the Recovery though upon good title shall not bind or restore the Demandant to his right So if Tenent in tail and his Issue disseise the Discontinuee to the use of the Father and the Father dyeth and the Land descendeth to the Issue in this case the Issue is not remitted against the Discontinuee in respect he was privy and party to the wrong but in respect of all others he is remitted and shall deraigne the first Warranty And so note a man may be remitted against one and not against another The like 13. A. and B. Ioint-tenants are intitled to a reall Action against the Heire of the Disseisor A. causeth the Heire to be disseised Co. ibid. against whom A. and B. recover and sue execution In this case B. is remitted for that he was not party to the Covin and shall hold in common with A. but A. is not remitted causa qua supra False Plea 14. He that will have the benefit of the Statute of Glocester Co. ibid. 366. a. 3. Co. l. 8. 53. a. 3. in Sims case cap. 3. 6 E. 1. must plead the truth of his case viz. the Warranty acknowledge the title of the Demandant and pray that the advantage of the Statute may be saved to him and then if afterwards assets descend the Tenant upon this Record shall have a Scire facias c. But if the Tenant plead the Warranty and plead further that assets descended c. and the Demandant taketh Issue that assets descended not c. which Issue is found for the Demandant whereupon he recovereth In this case the Tenant albeit assets do afterwards descend shall never have a Scire facias upon the said Iudgment for that by his false Plea he hath lost the benefit of the Statute Outlawry by 〈◊〉 15. Imprisonment is a good cause to reverse an Outlawry Co. Inst pars 1. 259. b. 2. if it be by Processe of Law in invitum but if it be by consent and covin such Imprisonment shall not avoid an Outlawry because upon the matter it is his own act Attornment 16. Where the Tenant hath notice Co. l. 2. 68. a. 2. in Tookers case that the Seigniory was granted but to one or that the Reversion was granted but of one Acre or that the Reversion was granted for fewer years or that the Reversion was granted for life onely with no Remainder over whereas it was in any of the cases otherwise in such case generall Attornement without true notice of the Grant is void for the usuall pleading which intent is the oracle of the Law is to which Grant he attorned and therefore if he hath not notice of the Grant or which is all one true notice thereof the assent which he gives to it which in truth is but part of the Grant the Law which abhors falsehood will not construe to be Attornment to the true Grant Fine by covin to bar 17. A man possessed of divers parcells of Land within the Mannor of D. whereof some he held for years others at will others by copy Co. l. 3. 77. b. 2. in Farmers case in Margaret Podgers case Co. l. 9. 105. b. 1. and some also in fee demiseth the whole to another for life and then levies a Fine to the Tenant for life and his Heires of so many Acres as amount to the whole Land continues Possession and payes the rents to the Lord five years passe yet in this case the Lord is not barred by the Statute of 4 H. 7. cap. 24. For the makers of that Statute did never intend that such a Fine levyed by fraud and practice of Tenant for years at will or by copy which pretend no title to the Inheritance but intend the disherison of their Lessors or Lords should bar them of their Inheritance and this appeares by the preamble of the said Act where it is said that Fines ought to be of greatest strength to avoid strifes and debates but when Tenant for years at will or by copy make Feoffment by assent and covin that a Fine should be levyed this is not to avoid strife and debate but by assent and covin to begin and stir them up And therefore that Statute did not intend to establish any such estate made and created by such fraud and practice which being fraudulent is upon the matter no estate at all c. vide pl. ibid. A fraudulent â—â—e of goods 18. The grant of goods albeit it be made upon good consideration Co. l. 3. 80. b. 4. in Twines case yet if it be not bona fide but hath trust in it or other badges of fraud as if the Grantor keep them still in his own Possession useth them as his own in disposing of them or otherwise or if they be Sheep and the Grantor brand them with his own mark or when he grants all his Goods and doth not except so much as his wearing apparrell or the like such a Grant is within the Statute of 13 Eliz. 5. and upon a Fieri facias at anothers Suit the Sheriff may seise them as if no Grant at all had been made thereof Vide pl. in that case to the like purpose Queritur ut crescunt tot magna volumina Legis In promtu causa est crescit in orbe dolus Co. l. 4. 26. a. 1. in Kite and Quientons case 19. Pretenced titles of
c. hereupon C. brings a writ of Error c. and for one of the Errors assigns that albeit Ludlow be a Court of Record yet it is not such a Court as is intended by the Statute for causes of that nature for that the antient usage in all such popular actions or informations hath been that albeit the Informer tam pro domina Regina quam pro ipso exhibits the Information yet if the defendant pleads a special plea the Quéens Attorney shall reply alone and it was intended by the makers of the said Act that the sute should be in such a Court where the Kings Attorney may attend for the benefit which the King may have by such a sute and that is in the four Courts at Westminster And thereupon the Iudgement was reversed Vide Dyer 236. 24. Admission and Institution 32 He that comes in by Admission and institution Co. l. 6. 49. b. 1. in Boswels case comes in by a judicial act and the Law presumes that the Bishop who hath the cure of the Souls of all within his diocess for which he shall answer at his fearfull and final account in respect whereof he ought to defend them from all Schismatiques Heretiques and other Instruments of the devil will not do or assent to any wrong to be done to any Parsonage within his diocess but if the Church be litigious will inform himself of the truth de Iure Patronatus and so do right Peer agâ— 33 The person of a Peer of the Realm or a Countess Baroness Co. l. 6. 52. b. 3. in the Countess of Rutlands case c. by marriage or descent ought not to be arrested for debt or trespass because the Law presumes that they have sufficient in lands and tenements whereby they may be distrained and therefore in such cases issues only shall go out against their lands And albeit a Countess Baroness c. in respect of her sex cannot sit in Parliament yet she is a Peer of the Realm and shall be tried by her Peers as appears by the Statute of 20 H. 6. cap. 9. which is but a declaration of the Common Law Vide plus ibidem Cestuy que use 34 If Cestuy que use had granted his use by his will Co. l. 6. 76. a. 3. in Sir Geo. Cursons case no collusion could have been averred upon such a will to obtain the wardship of his heir for Nemo praeâ—umitur esse immemor suae aeternae salutis et maxime in articulo mortis et omne testamentum morte consummatum est And therefore the Statute of 4 H. 7. 10. which gives the wardship of Cestuy que use makes exception when any will is by him declared Vide 27 H. 8. 14. Divorce 35 Ch. and Eliz. were divorced in the Court of Audience ratione aetatis minoâ—is et impubertatis Eliz. after they had lived ten years together and had issue a daughter Co. l. 7. 43. b. Kennes case and afterwards Ch. marrying another woman by another Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court the first marriage was declared void the second good and liberty given them ad exequenda conjugalia obsequia The second wife dies and Ch. marries a third wife and hath issue another daughter The last daughter is found heir by office the first traverseth the office by bill in the Court of Wards And in this case it was resolved that albeit the first was in truth a lawfull marriage yet the Sentence of divorce being in force no averment could be admitted against it because the Spiritual Iudge having jurisdiction thereof before the Sentence were repealed it was intended by Law to be Iust and our Law gave credence thereunto for Res Judicata pro veritate accipitur See Dyer 13. pl. 62. Co. l 9. 52. b. 4 in Hickmols case 36 If the Obligee confess himself to be discharged of all bonds betwixt him and the Obligor Release of bonds this by intendment of Law is a release or discharge of all bonds betwixt them for albeit the word discharge is not properly said of the part of the Obligee but of the Obligor for the Obligor is to be discharged yet in judgement of Law such an acknowledgement amounts to a discharge of the Obligor of all such duties Co. l. 9. 109. Meriel Treshams case 37 In debt against an executor he cannot plead quod ipse non habet c. aliqua bona c. praeter bona Plea of Executor c. quae non sufficiunt ad satisfacienda debita praedicta but he ought to plead quod non habet c. bona c. praeterquam bona catalla ad valentiam of a certain summ non ultra quae eisdem debitis obligata onerabilia existunt for the first plea is insufficient for the uncertainty vide Max. 162. pl. 61. and the other he ought to plead because he being privy and representing the person of the testator hath by intendment of Law notice of the certainty and certain value of the goods and therefore in such case ought to plead certainly as aforesaid The like Law is of an administrator for the goods of the Intestate Co. l. 11 13. a. 1. in Priddle and Nappâ—rs case 38 Of Impropriations formerly given to Monasteries Appropriations not only those which were truly Impropriate but likewise such as had been and were so in reputation were given to H. 8. by the intendment of the Statutes of Dissolution for albeit in those Statutes there is a saving of rights yet the Founders Donors c. are excepted out of that Saving so as they are bound by the body of the Act. Co l. 11. 16. a 4. in Doct. G anâ—s case 39 A Prescription Tites that every Inhabitant in the parish is to pay 2 s. in the pound according to the value of their houses yearly instead of Tithes is a good prescription because by intendment of Law the commencement thereof might be lawfull for it might be so by composition for the land before the houses were built 40 It is a Principle in Law that a barr is good if it be certain Plea in barr to a common intent good to a common intent Pl. Co. 28. a. 4. Colchrist Bernshin Vide ibid. 31. a. 33 a. 4. â—6 a. 3. as if a Messuage be demised to A. for life the remainder to B. for life si ipse B. vellet inhabitare in messuagio praedicto c. Here in an Action brought by the lessor for the recovery of the Messuage c. upon the condition broken it is a good barr for B. to say that after the death of A. he entred without averring the time of his entry viz. immediately after the death of A. because by intendment of Law it will be presumed he did so enter So if one plead in barr that A. died seised and that B. entred as son and heir to A. this is a good barr
just cause the Mulier is barred for ever for the possession of the King when he hath no just cause of seisure shall be adjudged the possession of him for whose cause he seised But if after the death of the Father the Mulier be found heir and within age and the King seiseth In such case the possession of the King is in right of the Mulier and vesteth the actual possession in the Mulier and consequently the Bastard eigne is foreclosed of any right for ever so it is likewise when the King seiseth for a contempt or other offence of the father or of any other ancestor In that case if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon a Petition be restored for that the seisure was without just cause the Mulier is not barred because the bastard could never enter and consequently could gain no estate in the land but the possession of the King in that case shall be adjudged in the right of the Mulier Vide 2 Ass pl. 9. Copyhold 2 If a Copihold estate fall into the Lords hands by escheat Co. l. 4. 31. a. 2. in Frenches case forfeiture or the like and the Lord make a lease thereof for years life or other estate by deed or without deed or if the Lord make a feoffment thereof in fee upon condition and enter for the condition broken or if the Copyhold so forfeited or escheated before any new grant thereof made be extended upon a Statute or Recognisance acknowledged by the Lord or if the feme of the Lord in a writ of Dower hath that land assigned to her In all these cases and albeit these last impediments are by acts in Law yet for as much as all these interruptions are lawful the lands can never after be granted by Copy because after such disposition thereof it was not demised or demisable But if the interruption be tortious as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor die seised or if the land be recovered against the Lord by a false verdict or erronious judgement In these cases until the land be recovered or the judgement nulled or reversed by the Lord of the Manor the land was not demised or demisable and yet after the land is recontinued it is again grantable by Copy because the interruption was tortious for Non valet Impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum quod contra legem fit pro infecto habetur Restraint to alien 3 If a man make a gift in tail upon condition that the donee shall not alien yet in such case if the donee suffer a Common recovery Co. l. 6. 41. b. 2. in Sir Anthony Mildmayes case that is no breach of the Condition because it is a Conveyance allowed by Law in respect of the intended recompence but if he make a feoffment in fee or any other estate whereby the reversion is tortiously discontinued the donor may enter for the Condition broken for every act which is prohibited by Law or is a tort may be prohibited by condition vide 10 H. 7. 11. So if a feoffment be made to Baron and feme upon condition that they shall not alien yet that doth not restrain their joint alienation by fine because it is lawfull and incident to their estate But their feoffment or alienation by deed is restrained by such a condition for that is tortious and against Law Also if a man enfeoff an Infant in fee upon condition that he shall not alien this cannot restrain him to alien at his full age but during his minority it doth because that is tortious and prohibited by Law Co. l 7. 6 a. 3. in Sendâ—ls case 4 One of the reasons Robbery why the robbing of an house either in the day or in the night is not within the Statute of Winchester for the Hundred to satisfie the damages is for that it is not lawfull for any man to enter into the house of another for the safeguard thereof Co. l. 11. 74. a. 3. Magd. Coll. case 5 Albeit the Friers Carmelites were of a Profession of Religion Carmelites and had not any habitation so as it seemed to be a work of piety and charity to provide an habitation for them yet non facias malum ut inde fiat bonum F.N.B. 36. f. 6 If a man be disseised of a Manor to which an Advowson is appendant Usurpation and the disseisor suffers an usurpation by a stranger to the advowson and after the disseisée re-enters into the Manor he shall present to the advowson when it happens to be void notwithstanding such usurpation Dyer 168. 19. 1 Eliz. 7 Bronker Sherif of Wiltshire to prevent perjury in his office Sheriffs oath did neglect to be sworn in incepto officii which he ought to have done by the antient Common Law of the Realm for which contempt he was fined and imprisoned by decrée in the Star-chamber Dyer 219. 10. 5 Eliz. 8 A man is bound to deliver the key of an house Livery of seisin and quiet possession to the Maior of London to the use of the obligee no person being in the house he locks the door and delivers the key to the Maior out of view A stranger pretending title enters into the house This séems to be no delivery of possession yet verdict was given for it which was afterwards affirmed in Attaint And the reason séems to be for that the impediment was unlawfull 196 Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum Co. l. 11 88. b. 1 in the case of Monopolies 1 The Charter of making and importing Cards being adjudged in the 11 Rep. a Monopoly had a glorious preamble and pretext Monopolies yet was repealed as derogatory to the Kings honor and very pernicious to the Commonwealth And indeed it is true Quod privilegia quae revera sunt in praejudicium Reipublicae magis speciosa habent frontispicia et boni publici praetextum quam bonae et legales concessiones but Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum Dyer 35 6. 33. 29 H. 8. 2 If a lessée hath liberty to fell trées to repair the house Waste and he fells 4. Oaks for that purpose and sells them and buyes 4. other Oaks as good and imployes them towards the repair of the house yet that is waste for the cutting of them down and selling them was a tort so if a man sell the distress which he hath caken and impounded and afterwards finding his error buyes them again and impounds yet their sale is a tort and the impounding of the Cattel afterwards shall not excuse it Dyer 36. b. 38. 29 H. 8. 3 If the lessor be bound to a man in 100 l. and the lessée cuts down 20 Oaks sells them and payes the obligée for the lessor Waste yet an action of waste lyeth against the lessee for felling the trees albeit the money arising upon the sale was converted to the