a great abatement in the Countrey of what is spent and paid in London 7. The last thing which shall be mentioned touching this matter and which is most suitable to the propounded end of the discourse in hand is that this carrying of all causes to Westminster makes in a manner all the Courts of Record in all other Cities Towns Corporate with the County Courts Hundred Courts and the Courts of the Mannours and all other Court Barons to be disused and in a manner destroyed to the prejudice both of Lords and Tenants who are much impoverished with Suites at Westminster upon every trivial occasion and in the mean while there is much disorder at home for want of Courts to redresse petty wrongs and so to keep and preserve quietnesse 8. These things are enumerated as evils occasioned by the general Residence of the Laws at Westminster without reference to the particular Courts now something shall be spoken of in relation to the several Courts which are necessitously oppressive to the Suiters in regard of the multitudes of Suites The chief grievance in this kinde is the crowding of all causes of Equity into Court of Chancery except a very few in some cases in the Exchequer in which Court there have been said to be ten thousand causes entred into the six Clarks books some of which are seven eight or ten years old and without doubt there are as many more upon Sub-poena's and Bills not fil'd of all these there cannot be lesse than one thousand alwayes ready for hearing besides such as stand to be heard upon Reviews Pleas Demurrers Exceptions and Reports And in one Term there is not time usually to determine one third part of them besides hearing of motions which necessarily arise in most cases the rest being put â—ff insomuch that many times you shall finde above twenty cauâ—s in the paper for one day whereas within thirty years last past ere were usually appointed not above four or five causes to be â—eard every day in Court and not many more at the Rolles But since the abolishing and disuse of the Court of Wards Court of Requests high Commission Star-Chamber Ecclesiastical Courts as they were called Queens Court and Dutchy Court every of which as might be easily shewed especially the Court of Requests poured something into this Ocean the Chancery the same is grown so full that it 's impossible that the causes there should be dispatched without an excessive charge and long attendance (i) Cooke English Law pag. 45 46. And this Court as it now stands is the next great oppression of the Nation and tends chiefly to the inriching some few Officers and Practicers and the impoverishing of the Common-wealth where in most causes unlesse they be agreed by Compromise the remedy is worse than the disease 9. The next thing to which I take exception occasioned by the general practice of the Laws at Westminster which may be accounted a grievance is That almost all the Suites in Law of the whole Nation are brought in the Courts of the Upper Bench and Common-Pleas which are more tedious and chargeable than they need to be for whereas a man arraigned for his life hath but a day nay it may be but an hours warning to make his defence onely he knows before hand when the Goal-delivery will be here regularly a man cannot begin and end his Suit be it never so trivial under three Terms unlesse the Defendant will confesse the Action especially in the upper Bench where after the Arrest or appearance which sometinies is hard to get done the first Term the Plaintiff declares and the Defendant imparles the second Term the Defendant pleads to issue and the Plaintiffe carries down the cause to tryal to the Assizes where if the cause be tryed Judgement is given thereupon in the next Term following and this takes up about (k) At new England the Defendant hath warning a covenient time before the Causse be heard and most Causes are ended upon the hearing at the same Court. Lechfords News pag. 29. seven moneths time but if the Defendant be wilfull and liberal he may keep the Plaintiffe in Suit a far longer Term whereas in some Courts of Record in the Countrey such a cause may be ended in six weeks and might be done in half the time if the Law were amended and made like the proceedings in Wales which are better and shorter than at Westminster 10. To these may be added as an evil growing out of the general Execution of the Laws at Westminster the greatnesse of Offices both in respect of work and revenue which for the most part are executed by Clarks and Deputies and nothing done by the Master of the Office but onely to take the Accounts and receive the Fees at the end of the Term allowing little or nothing to such as do the work but what comes by sharking the late-born Miscreant called Expedition and indeed the great Officer who stands like an Andiron in a great Room onely to make a shew sets the Clarks to all the labour and to abide the heat of the businesse And this must needs be so for these Officers formerly used to pay seven years purchase for their Offices Is it not a shame that one man should pay for an Office first and lust forty thousand pounds as it 's generally said one paid for the Upper Bench Office That a Prothonotor of the Common-Pleas should pay nine thousand pounds for his Office That a six Clark in Chancery should pay seven thousand pounds for his Office And not Aphilozers The Romans used not to sâ—ll Offices the Qâ—â—stoâ—ship was granted according to the worth of the Suiters untâ—ll by Dolabella's advice it was put to Salt which is blamed by the Heathen Historian as a fault Tacit. Annal. lib. 11. cap 7. pag 148. The Senators were chosen by voices and if they proved infamous they gave up their places to save their Credits Idem l. 11. c. 8. p. 150. Exigenters Clark of the Warrants Essoines Curciters or hardly any other Office to the very Cryer and Bag-bearer but all exposed to Sale in this last Age and many times sold to such as were onely fit to be entertained because they gave the most money for them And then as a necessary consequence he that bought dear must sell dear insomuch that I have heard it credibly reported that a Souldier becoming a Courtier was by King James made a Master of the Chancery the man I knew well this Master being taxed that he expected too much money in some businesses before him in an angry manner said that the King promised him that the place should be worth five hundred pounds by the year to him and he would make it so if he could (l) Alexander Severus at his coming to the Empire after that proâ—use beast Heliogacalus although he found thâ— State much in debt refused to make Sale of any Offiâ—e saying Non Paâ—iâ—r mercatores Potestatum and
Writ of Execution of it and obeys it and this is the best that can be expected And then the parties fall to cast up their Accompts and it 's found That the Plaintiff at Law spent Eight pounds and the Defendant four pounds The Plaintiff in Chancery spent Twenty pounds and the Defendant Twenty Marks Lay all this together and in conclusion the Debtor hath spent 24 l. and paid 11 l. 6 s. 8 d. and the Creditor hath spent 21 l. 6 s. 8 d. and received for his Debt and Costs 11 l. 6 s. 8 d. So the Creditor loseth his Debt and Ten pounds out of his purse and the Debtor hath spent and paid 35 l. 6 s. 8 d. where the first Debt was but Ten pounds and the Remainder was but thirty shillings O famous Law and Equity I could shew many of these Cases And indeed this hath been the common practice with most Judges to send men to Equity and they ought to do so whilest the Law stands as it doth Now apply this to the Rule and Argument above-mentioned The Law could not relieve the Debtor but Equity doth relieve him Which of these two hath done him Right The Law did him none for if it had done him Right then the Chancery ought not to have done the contrary which it hath done for to charge a man and to discharge him are clean contrary And the Chancery hath not relieved him for in effect he hath paid and spent more then treble the principal Debt and Interest So upon the point he is relieved no-where And yet every man will say He is no just man who refuseth to deliver up a Bond when it 's fully paid How doth this Law put all together give every man Right and if it do not then is it an unjust Law I do confidently affirm That no Nation professing the Gospel ought to have or maintain any Law so severe or rigid that it needs any Court of Equity to moderate it If it were needful or convenient in any case to have relief in Equity it must needs be in case of Life and Death which is a business of higher Concernment then a little Money and more favoured in Law But no man ever heard of a Bill preferred into any Court of Equity to save one from the Gallows and therefore it is to be presumed there is no need of any such Court if the Law were Just and Equal But because it may be every man will not be satisfied that in the Case above-mentioned there was a direct Repugnancy in the Judgements of these two Courts because The Chancery did give relief in Tanto though not in Toto I 'll onely put one short Case more to put the matter out of question A man indebted upon a single Bill payes the Money upon the day in the Bill appointed and hath Witness of the payment but the Bill cannot be found This Bill comes after to be put in Suit the Defendant cannot be admitted to plead payment at the day nor hath he any other Plea sufficient in Law to discharge himself nor can be relieved at Law unless he have a Release although he prove the Debt paid but Judgement must needs pass against him either by Default or Confession or upon a Verdict after Issue joyned upon some false Plea which the Defendant thinks most easie and after which he shall have most colour of Equity Well Judgement is passed and the Defendant must expect Execution without relief at Law But for fear of the worst the Defendant hath before Judgement his Bill preferred into the Chancery to which the Defendant Plaintiff at Law answereth and the Cause comes to hearing where it appears the Debt to be paid thereupon the Court decrees the Bill to be delivered up Here is a just Contradiction and diametrical Opposition The Law condemns the Debtor or at least will not relieve him and the Chancery doth discharge him of the debt and so relieves him Upon this consideration some honest Judges of late dayes have used in some Cases to order the Plaintiff upon the Defendants payment of the principal Debt with Interest and Costs or what shall appear to be unpaid to deliver up the Specialty and discontinue the Suit or stay the same This is a short and equal way which is Justice and no more to give every one his Right according to that of the wise Heathen (n) Plutarch in Laco Apoph Stob. ser 7. Ex Agesil Nihil praeter aequum faciendum esse c. Justitiam semper oportet esse Clementiam temperatam Yet this is contrary to the Law and no Record is made of any such Judgement But other Judges have usually said in such Cases The Defendant must seek relief in Equity they must do Justice that is shew Extremity These two Courts can no more consist with Justice then two Weights or Measures of different bigness or length I use this familiar Comparison because it pleaseth the Holy Ghost to make use thereof to this very purpose Prov. 20.10 Prov. 20.10 Diverse weights and diverse measures are both alike abomination to the Lord. These words Diverse weights and diverse measures (o) D. J. Burgis in hunc loc word for word out of the Original are a stone and a stone that is different Weights and Measures of several sizes one bigger another less and this is expounded by that in Deut. 25.13 14. Deut. 25.13 14. Thou shalt not have in thy bagge diverse Weights a great and a small Thou shalt not have in thy house diverse Measures a great and a small These words by a Synecdoche speciei Note The difference between L. Chancellor Egerton and L. Chief Justice Coke about the Power of the Chancery after a Judgement at Law Wilson Hist Great Britain pag. 95. Bodinus the learned Civilian observes That Contention between great Magistrates or Courts about their Power or Jurisdiction is always hurtful to the poor Subjects Bodin Repub. l. 3. c. 6. p. 356. forbid all unjust and unequal dealing and commerce amongst men and all Injustice and Iniquity and the instruments tools and means thereof and implicitely the same Law commands all Justice and Equity and directly forbids two Courts having contrary Powers and Jurisdictions and executing things Repugnant and contrary one to another If the one proceed justly the other must needs be unjust Neither do the Scriptures any-where mention Justice and Equity as two several things to be distributed in one Case as if that might be done by the one which might not be done by the other nor that ever any good Judges gave any such Judgments but rather when they are said to do Justice it 's intended That they did justly and equally It 's true that the (p) Exod. 21.1 Judicial Laws are called Judgements and the execution of the Moral Law is called Justice And so (q) 2 Sam. 8.15 David is said to execute Judgement and Justice that is to judge justly and righteously both in respect
the entry accordingly of persons acting and things done but nothing really except the parties coming to the Bar to do they know not what This is meerly a device or fiction to deceive and scrue morny from the people the very fees come to almost four pounds besides the fine upon the Alienation which is according to the value of the Land taxed by the Commissioners if above 40 shillings by the year it may be from 6 shill 8 pence to 20 pounds lesse or more All which might be saved if all mens estates were made fee-simple and the Statute de Donis Conditionalibus replealed or that the making of a Feoffment which is done by livery or the Inrolment of a Deed might discontinue the intail and Bar the Remainders In the mean while this Common recovery in regard of the expence is an oppression and the formality or rather subject matter of it being nothing but lyes whether Jocosa officiosa or perniciosa is against the Law of God Col. 3.9 Levit. 19.11 Rev. 21.8 Rev. 22.15 2. That Errours in Judgments and proceedings in the Upper-bench the Action being brought by Original should not be heard and determined but before the (b) Wingat Law cap. 47. pag. 89. N. 10. King or Lord Protector and Lords in Parliament seems to be a hard Law and at best is a Tedious and expensive way and so an oppression to the people and against the Law of God Ezek. 18.8 1 Thes 4.6 Isai 33.15 Prov. 22.16 3. (c) Westm 2. c. 1. Stat. de Donis Condit 27 H. 8. c. 10. Statute of Vses Châ—dlyes Case Coke l. 1. fol. 121. Intails upon the heirs males of a mans body with remainders over to brothers and after to strangers of the name to the disinherising of ones own Daughter having no Son is sinful and against the Judgment of Almighty God immediately given in the case of Zelopheads Daughter declared with an emphatical addition That this shall be a Law of Judgment c. That if a man have no Son his inheritance shall go to his Daughter There is a Custome in Ireland that all Lands which have not come to the Kings hands by surrender escheate Attainder or forfeiture The eldest Son of the house shall enjoy the same during his Life and then the second and third if there be so many Brothers before the heir in Lineal descent This is called the Custome of Tanestrie and the same grew by reason of their Civill warrs not only the greatest against the greatest but even every Baron and Gentleman one against another Therefore they left their Successors of Age to defend their territories Davis Report case Tanest Ra. Histor lib. 2. cap. 4. S. 15. And the same is a Law of Common equity not one of those Judicials which only did binde the Jews in their own Land but dictated to every man by the Law of nature which teacheth that a mans own child being part of himself is more dear and near to him then a stranger and hitherto is that to be referred He that provides not for his own and those of his own House first his own Wife then his own Children and then his Servants as the rest of the househould such a one hath denyed the faith and is worse then an Infidel Then are many of the Nobility and Gentry worse then Infidels whose inheritances upon such an Atheistical or Heathenish opinion as the builders of Babel had to get them a name least they should be scattered are turned from their Daughters to strangers and little or nothing left for them upon consideration of which a wise and Religious Judge once said I would surely make such mine heir whom God makes mine heir the contrary practise is against the Law of God and nature Numb 27.7 8. 1 Tim. 5.8 4. In a Replevin no man living knoweth what is the general issue to be pleaded by vertue of the last Statute and in some cases there can be no (d) This is agreed by the Protonotaries of the Common-Pleas and the practise is accordingly Finch 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lib. 1. fol. 14. Judgment to have the Cattle returned and when such Judgment hath been given and the Cattle taken upon a reâ—urn habend he that took them and obtained the Judâ—ment can neither use them as his own nor sell them nor can the former owner have them again but either the Taker muâ—â— keep them at his own charge until the owner will redeem them or they must dye in the Pynfold and then the Avowant who first distreyned may distrayn again and go to suite afresh and so be put to a circuit of Action which the Law in other cases doth disallow This is a foolish and ridiculous Law and against Common right and so against the Law of God every one ought to have recompence in his suite where the Law passeth for him Lam. 3.36 59. Amos 5.24 1 Kings 10.9 Isai 59.14 5. The practise in real and mixt actions occasioning (e) Stat. 51. H. 3. concern dayâ—s in Real Act. and Stat. 51. H. 3. concerning dayes in Dower many Delayes by Essoynes Adjournments Veiw Counterpleading Colour and Dilatory pleas is a great oppression by reason of the delay and unreasonable expence besides the nicety and thereby uncertainty in the proceedings where by mistake of a word syllable or dash with a pen or coming to adjourn an hour too late the Cause may be lost this is an oppression and a meer Trap to catch men and an occasion of much injustice for who will yield to any man his right where he hath hope to foile his adversary by any such trick or weary him at Law Job 22.10 Luke 18.4 Isai 59.14 6. Trials by Nisi prius in personal Actions begun in the Courts at Westm where the plaintiffe to have amends for a trespass or battery for which five shilling would satisfie him This is Common in evâ—ry mans Practise and needs no Proof must spend before he can have Judgment neer eight pounds and the Defendent about half as much although to his ruine and he must pay the plaintiffs charges and damages which is all in nature of Damages or lye in Gaol this is a grievous Law and not to be suffered but rather such Courts of Record are to be Cherished where a cause may be tryed for 30 or 40 shillings this were more for ease of the people and more agreeable to the Law of God 1 Sam. 12.4 Isai 58.6 Isai 5.7 and 33.15 Zeph. 3.1 7. The like and much more may be said concerning tryalls at the Bar Common Experience shews this to be liue which cannot be tryed if the Jurors come but two dayes Journy under an hundred marks and commonly there is much more spent This is a horrible oppression and such courses make poor men affraid to sue for their right and great men to Trample upon the poor the same is a crying offence against God Psal 73.8 Ezek. 18.8 1 Thes 4.6 Prov. 22.16 Isai 33.15
a number as might be such a Survey might do well in the Courts in these dayes to the end that the trivial frivilous and vexatious Suites being spewed out as (p) Lord Bâ—kon Essayes the surfets of all Courts such as were of good use and concernment might have time to be determined (q) Sueton. Tranq in vita Claudii Nâ—ronis sect 17. It was a Law amongst the Romans that no Clark or Notary who was to draw or write any other mans Will should put down any Legacy for himself Also that impleading and deciding of controversies all those causes which aforetime were debated before the Masters of the Exchequer or Citie Chamber should be removed into the Common-Hall there to be tried and that appeals from the Judges should be made onely to the Senate (r) Bodin Republ. l. 4. c 6. p. 500. 502. The Historian commendeth this practise Sueton. Tranq in vita Augusti Caesaris sect 33. Idem in vita Tiberii sect 31. 33. Augustus Caesar used to sit daily in Judgement to hear Causes in the Tribunal or if he had not health then in his own house (Å¿) Idem in vita Flavii Domitiani sect 8. Flavius Domitianus used also to sit in Judgement upon the Tribunal and many times reversed such Judgements as were given for favour or obtained by flattery he warned the Judges not to give ear to perswasions and Rhetorical assertions and such Judges as were faulty he used to tax publickly and he was so carefull to chastize the Magistrates that the Historian saith they were never more temperate and just in their places than in his dayes (t) Bodin ut supra p. 415. Romulus left the ordinary Administration of Justice to the Judges but reserved the greatest matters to his own Judgement (u) Godw. Aâ—â—i Rom. l. 3. Sâ—ct 4. c. 6. The Romans had a Law that no Senator should use any Trade but those were utterly forbidden the use of trading for fear it should breed favour or corruption And another Law of the Romans was (x) Idem l. 3. Sect. 4. c. 17. Ex Cicerone de Senectuâ—e that no Advocate or Oratour should receive any gift or reward from his Client for pleading his Cause for that they were paid by the Common-wealth which was a very (y) Cook Essai pag. 185. indifferent way for all people Cock Essay pag. 185. (z) Rous Att. Ant. l. 3. c. 1. pag. 110. and pag. 111. 112. The Graecians proceedings in their Courts was like to the Romans and if the Defendant did not appear upon the Summons he was taken by default and if he would have any ease against the Judgement he must bring the Cause on to hearing against himself within six weeks or else the first Judgement to stand That Defendant which had not five of the Judges voyces for him was to be fined and the Plaintiffe that made not good his charge was to pay costs And if the Cause were Criminal before the Suit was allowed to proceed the Prosecutor took his Oath that his accusation should be just Cook English Law p. 103. To conculde good Laws are more securitie to the people than good Magistrates our Laws have sufficient in them to bring in the whole body of Popery except the Popes supremacy and to destroy all the faithfull people of the Land and therefore it 's to be wished that the Laws were (a) Lâ—chfords Newâ— pa. 26. In the great Câ—uâ—t at new England held twice in â—he yâ—ar like our Assizes the Matters of the Charge to be inquired of are reduced by the Governour who gives the Charge under the Heads of the Decalogue made agreeable to the Laws of God and then if the proceeding and execution of them were either like the Jews the Graecians or the Romans and that all ordinary matters might be decited and determined in the proper Counties it would be found I doubt not a great blessing and happinesse to the people And I cannot imagine what can be said against this but that which is called reason of State the very name whereof an honest Pope abhorred This (b) Grotius Pol. Max. par 1. c. 4. p. 31. 32. as one saith was anciently the same with Equitie but as now it s used in the world is nothing else but a device that carries the face of equitie supposing it Lawfull not onely to transgesse the Laws of men (c) Bodin Republ l. 1. pag. 104. accounts this a thing most absurd The three Temples belonged to the Templâ—rs untill Ed. 2. his time and thence to the Hospitallers untill the desolution in the time of H. 8. but even the Laws of God for Politicke ends And since Machiavel plaid Achitophel this for shame is called reason of good government 1. This policie will tell us that thee hange of the Laws the practice thereof will dishonour and demolish the most famous Universitie in all the world for our kinde of learning the Inns of Court and of Chancery 2. It will Eclipse the glory of Westminster and a great part of London whose inhabitants live by lodging and victualling 3. That tediousnesse of Law-suits and the great expences thereof are to be tolerated as a necessary evil or punishment which serves to keep men quiet and deterre them from many unnecessary Suites which otherwise would be commenced but that they fear the remedie may be worse than the disease 4. That the Law is a (d) Tyrants use to imploy their Tributaries in wars abroad or idle and needlesse Trophies that they might want leasure to think of other things Jun. Brut. Vind. Conâ—râ— Tyran p. 10â— Upon this ground stage-playes and Stewes are suffered in some Countreys necessary evill to keep men from contriving and practising Worse mischief in the Common-wealth which they have no leasure to do whil'st they are wrangling and jangling about Law-suits 5. That expence on Law-suits is a good means to keep such men who are of restlesse and unquiet spirits poor in the Common-wealth whereby they are disabled to make head against the Government These and such like props for upholding this frame of building appear upon the first view to be too weak and unsound to prop up the same being herein already answered and are all overthrown by that rule of Scripture (e) Rom. 3 8. We must not do evil no not the least that good may come thereof Now seeing it hath pleased the Lord our God to bring us not onely out of that iron furnance and darknesse of Egypt the hard service and ignorance of Popery but also to give an end to our wildernesse miseries and to settle us in peace after all our wars and distempers and so to put us into a condition as the Israelites to receive good and wholsom Lawes let us learn Gods end in this and know for our instruction what is recorded by the Holy Ghost Psal 105. v. 43.44.45 hee brought forth his people with joy and his chosen with gladnesse c. And
Law of the 12 Tables is said to be the end of Law and Equity Tac. 1. Annal. l 3 c. 5. p. 71. Nature holds forth but one Light to men and God gives but one Law to Christians This is the end of Magistracy The Execution of Justice which in their hands whether Supreme or Subordinate is that Vertue which is commonly called Distributive Justice and comprehends in it (c) Equity is the Law of Nature to which all men are bound That is honest which is agreeable to the Equity of Nature Bod. Rep. l. 1. p. â—05 Equity and the same likewise is called Righteousness Now that Justice and Equity are the same thing there is nothing more clear as Aequum Justum are Termini convertibilés so are Justice and Equity (d) Weems M. L. Com. 8. Exerc 8. p. 225 230. Godw. Antiq. Rom. l. 3. sect 4. c. 1. Isa 59.13 14 15 Prov. 17.26 And these are indifferently taken one for the other in the Holy Scriptures Isa 59.14 Justice standeth afar off and Equity cannot enter By these two words is elegantly set forth the Injustice of the Magistrates who had to do in execution of Justice and Judgement as is there expressed The same appears in that place of the Proverbs To punish the just is not good nor to strike Princes for Equity It is an evil and wicked thing to punish men for doing that which is just or to abuse Magistrates for executing Justice Coloss 4.1 Col. 4.1 Masters give unto your Servants that which is just and equal The two words there used are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are indifferently taken one for the other and either of them signifie just or equal Phil. 1.7 Phil. 1.7 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arias Montanus translates it Sicut est justum (e) Pasor Lex p. 187. a. 2 Cor. 8.14 Pasor in his Lexicon renders it Prout aequitas postulat 2 Cor. 8.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is Englished That there may be equality The same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is translated by the (f) Pasor Lex p. 343. a. Learned Aequalitas aequitas justitia and so it 's indifferently used for either Equity or Justce which are the same thing being referred to the act of the Magistrate in distribution of Law or Right (g) Psal 98.9 1 John 3.7 And Almighty God is said to Judge the World with Righteousness and the People with Equity The like appeareth in many other Texts of Scripture And in the same sense these words Justice and Equity are indifferently used by Profane Authors to signifie the same thing and they are onely distinguished thus (h) Franc. Sylvii Com. Orat. Cicero pro Murena Tom. 1. p. 771. Aequitas est ratio Legis Jus vero sententia ipsa so that Equity and Right are not administred as several things (i) The Law without Equity is as the Body without the Soul The least Judges have power to judge and give sentence according to the equity of the cause Bodin Repub. l. 6. c. 6. p 763 764. but the one is in the minde of the Judge the other more perspicuous and both made up the act of Justice And the same Author chargeth it as a fault that Usu saepè venit ut inter se pugnent Juus Aequitas In this sense the Lawyers themselves have used Lex for Jus and Aequitas or the one for the other (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Finch c. 1. f. 1. Consuet Norm tit de Jure fo 125. tit de Justit cod Cust Norm tit Justice pag. 7. B. Arist Eth. l. 5. c. 41. Lex dicitur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 à distribuendo que ceo distribute droit a Chesc ' Because it gives Right to every one The very same words are used in opposition of that Law of the Romans called Lex (l) Eubul Din. Scho. in Orat. Cicer. de Lege Agraria tom 1. p. 710. This Law was for Division of Lands amongst the poor Commons being sound in the possession of private persons Tit. Liv. l. 2. p. 71. c. Agraria where the Commmentator in his Scholia's upon Cicero's Oration against that Law saith Lex suum cuique tribuit and thence reasons and concludes Logically thus Maj. The Law gives to every one Right Min. This Law doth not give to every one Right Concl. Ergo haec Lex Justitia non est Let our Law and Equity be laid to this Rule and see how any man living can defend both A poor man for Example is bounden in a Bond of Twenty pounds conditioned for payment of Ten pounds with Interest which Bond is forfeited because the Money was not paid at the day although it was paid two or three years after and nothing unpaid but Interest The Creditor puts this Bond in Suit it may be either out of meer covetousness or to hook in some other pretended Debt or Duty The Defendant pleads Condition performed or upon the general Issue gives in Evidence the payment of the Principal three years after the day limited in the Condition The Judge in such case must give direction for Law That the Jury must finde for the Plaintiff for that the Defendant (m) Justitia legalis stricte sumpta quatenus opponitur aequitati est iniquitas c. Amesii l. 5. de Conscientâ—â c. 2. p. 269. Finis Legis est Justitia Coed Rhod. l. 13. c. 19. p. 697. must have his Remedy in Equity and accordingly a Verdict is given for the Plaintiff And the Defendant preferreth his Bill into the Chancery and therein alledgeth all that is true and somewhat more to make his Bill hold and if the Plaintiff at Law get Judgement entred before the Bill come in which may be had the first week in the next Term after the Tryal there is an end of the Suit the poor man hath had Justice Summum Jus that is the extremity of the Law which is Summa Injuria and his Adversary hath Execution against him for the Twenty pounds Penalty and Eight pounds for Costs which is given in nature of damages This he Defendant must pay or lie in Goal and the Law as it is Justice in conceit cannot relieve him Well the poor man hath it may be got a Reprive upon preferring his Bill the Plaintiff at Law is either in Contempt or prayes a Dedimus Potestatem to answer in the Countrey or it may be in his Answer confesseth part of the Money paid or else that the Bond is ancient Hereupon the Complaint in Chancery obtaineth an Injunction and in short goes to Commission and brings the Cause to Hearing and hath a Decree That the Plaintiff paying the Interest which may be some thirty shillings and Costs which may be five Marks besides the aforesaid Eight pounds the Defendant who was Plaintiff at Law shall acknowledge satisfaction of the Judgement and deliver up the Bond. The Decree is inrolled and the Defendant served with a