Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	aforesaid_a	court_n	queen_n	6,649	5	10.2328	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A69901	England's independency upon the papal power historically and judicially stated by Sr. John Davis ... and by Sr. Edward Coke ... in two reports, selected from their greater volumes ; with a preface written by Sir John Pettus, Knight.	Davies, John, Sir, 1569-1626.; Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; Pettus, John, Sir, 1613-1690.	1674 (1674)	Wing D397; ESTC R21289	68,482	102

in the Civil Magistrate and so in right it remaineth at this day and though it be derived from him it remaineth in him as in the fountain For every Christian Monarch as well as the godly Kings of Juda is custos utriusque Tabulae and consequently hath power to punish not onely Treason Murther Theft and all manner of Force and Fraud but Incest Adultery Usury Perjury Simony Sorcery Idolatry Blasphemy Neither are these Causes in respect of their own quality and nature to be distinguished one from another by the names of Spirituall or Temporall For why is Adultery a Spirituall cause rather then Murther when they are both offences alike against the Second Table or Idolatry rather then Perjury being both offences likewise against the First Table And indeed if we consider the natures of these Causes it will seem somewhat absurd that they are distinguished by the name of Spirituall and Temporall for to speak properly that which is opposed to Spirituall should be termed Carnall and that which is opposed to Temporall should be called Eternall And therefore if things were called by their proper names Adultery should not be called a spirituall offence but a carnall But shall I expresse plainly and briefly why these Causes were first denominated some Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall and others Temporall and Civil Truly they were so called not from the nature of the Causes as I said before but from the quality of the persons whom the Prince had made Judges in those Causes The Clergie did study spirituall things and did professe to live secundum spiritum and were called spirituall men and therefore they called the Causes wherein Princes had given them jurisdiction spirituall causes after their own name and quality But because the Lay-magistrates were said to intend the things of this world which are temporall and transitory the Clergie called them secular or temporall men and the Causes wherein they were Judges temporall causes This distinction began first in the Court of Rome where the Clergie having by this Jurisdiction gotten great wealth their wealth begot pride their pride begot ingratitude towards Princes who first gave them their Jurisdiction and then according to the nature of all ungratefull persons they went about to extinguish the memory of the benefit for whereas their Jurisdiction was first derived from Caesar in the execution whereof they were Caesar's Judges so as both their Courts and Causes ought still to have born Caesar's image and superscription as belonging unto Caesar they blotted Caesar's name out of the style of their Courts and called them Courts Christian as if the Courts holden by other Magistrates had been in comparison but Courts of Ethnicks and the Causes which in their nature were meerly Civil they called Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall So as if the Emperour should challenge his Courts and Causes again and say Reddite Caesariquae sunt Caesaris they would all cry out on the contrary part and say Date Deo quae sunt Dei our Courts bear the name and title of Christ the superscription of Caesar is quite worn out and not to be found upon them And this point of their policy is worth the observing that when they found their jurisdiction in Matrimoniall causes to be the most sweet and gainfull of all other for of Matrimony they made matter of money indeed to the end that Caesar might never resume so rich a perquisite of their Spirituall jurisdiction they reduced Matrimony into the number of the 7 Sacraments after which time it had been Sacriledge if the Civil Magistrate had intermeddled with the least matter that had relation to Matrimonie or any dependencie thereupon So then it appeareth that all Causes whereof Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall persons have cognisance or jurisdiction by the grants or permission of Princes are called Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall causes And as all their Courts are called Spirituall Courts so all Causes determinable in those Courts are called Spirituall Causes And therefore where Mr. Lalor hath acknowledged the King's Majestie to be Supreme Governour in all Ecclesiasticall causes he hath therein acknowledged the King's Supremacie in all Spirituall causes wherein he hath but rendered to Caesar that which is Caesar's and hath given unto his Majestie no more then all the Bishops of England have yielded to his Predecessours not onely in this latter Age but also in former times both before and since the Conquest as hath been before at large expressed Here the day being far spent the Court demanded of the prisoner if he had any more to say for himself His answer was That he did willingly renounce his office of Vicar-generall and did humbly crave his Majestie 's grace and pardon And to that end he desired the Court to move the L. Deputy to be favourable unto him Then the Jury departed from the Bar and returning within half an hour found the prisoner guiltie of the Contempts whereof he was indicted Whereupon the Solicitor generall moved the Court to proceed to Judgement And Sir Dominick Sarsfield Knight one of the Justices of his Majestie 's chief place gave Judgement according to the form of the Statute whereupon the Indictment was framed OF THE KING' 's Ecclesiasticall Law IN the Term of S. Hillary in the 33. year of the Reign of Q. Elizabeth Rotulo 340. Robert Caudrey Clerk brought an action of Trespasse against George Atton for breaking of his Close at North-Luffenham in the County of Rutland the 7. day of August in the 31. year of the Reign of the said Queen The Defendant pleaded not guilty and the Jury returned and sworn for triall of this issue gave a speciall Verdict that is they found the truth of the Case at large referring the same for the Law to the judgment of the Court to this effect They found that the Plaintif before the Trespasse supposed to be done was Parson of the Rectory of South-Luffenham in the County aforesaid whereof the place wherein the Trespass is alledged was parcell and found the Statute made in the first year of the said Queen's Reign by which in effect it is enacted That such Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall as by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power hath heretofore been or may lawfully be exercised for the Visitation of the Ecclesiasticall estate and persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities within this Realm should for ever be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realm And that her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England to assign nominate and authorize such persons being natural-born Subjects as her Highness her Heirs or Successors should think meet to exercise and execute under her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors all and all manner of Jurisdiction Priviledges and Preheminences in any wise touching or concerning any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction within this

elective which be of his Avowry as his Progenitors did before that free Election was granted fithence that the Elections were first granted by the King's Progenitors upon a certain form and condition as to demand licence of the King to chuse and after the Election to have his Royall Assent and not in other manner which conditions not kept the King ought by reason to resort to the first nature as by the said Act more at large appeareth In the 27. year of the Reign of the same King it was grievously complained to the King in a Parliament then holden by the Great men and Commons of the Realm how that divers of the people were and had been drawn out of the Realm to answer to things whereof the conusance pertained to the King's Court and also that the Judgments given in the same Court were impeached in other Courts in prejudice and disherison of the King and of his Crown and of all the people of his said Realm and to the undoing and destruction of the Common Law of the same Realm at all times used Whereupon good deliberation being had with the Great men and others of his said Council it was assented and accorded by the King and the Great men and Commons aforesaid That all the people of the King's allegeance of what condition that they be which should draw any out of the Realm for plea whereof the conusance pertained to the King's Court or for things whereof Judgments were given in the King's Court or which did sue in any other Court to defeat or impeach the Judgments given in the King's Courts should incur the danger of Premunire as by the said Act appeareth To nourish love peace and concord between Holy Church and the Realm and to appease and cease the great hurt and perils and importable losses and grievances that had been done and happened in times past and that should happen hereafter if the thing from thenceforth be suffered to pass because of personal Citations and other that be passed before this time and commonly did passe from day to day out of the Court of Rome by feigned and false Suggestions and Propositions against all manner of persons of the Realm upon Causes whose cognisance and final discussing pertained unto the King and his Royal Court and also of Impetrations and Provisions of Benefices and Offices of Holy Church pertaining to the gift presentation donation and disposition of the King and other Lay Patrons of this Realm as of Churches Chappels and other Benefices appropriated to Cathedrall Churches Abbies Priories Chauntries Hospitalls and other poor Houses and of other Dignities Offices and Benefices occupied in times past and presented by divers and notable persons of the said Realm for which causes and dispensing whereof the good ancient L●ws Usages Customes and Franchises of the said Realm had been and were greatly appaired blemished and confounded the Crown of their Sovereign Lord the King minished and his Person falsely defamed his Treasury and Riches of the Realm carried away the inhabitants and subjects of the Realm impoverished and troubled the Benefices of Holy Church wasted and destroyed Divine Service Hospitalities Alms-deeds and works of charity withdrawn and set apart the Commons and Subjects of the Realm in body and goods consumed The King at his Parliament holden at Westminster in the Vtas of S. Hillary the 38. year of his Reign having regard to the quietness of his people which he chiefly desired to sustain in tranquillity and peace to govern according to the Laws Usages and Franchises of his Land as he was bound by his Oath made at his Coronation following the ways of his Progenitors which for their time made certain good Ordinances and Provisions against the said Grievances and Perils which Ordinances and Provisions and all the other made in his time and especially in the 25. and 27. years of his Reign the King by the assent and expresse will and concord of the Dukes Earls Barons and the Commons of this Realm and of all other whom these things touched by good and meet deliberation and advisement did approve accept and confirm as by the said Act appeareth But those which should execute the said good Laws against such capitall Offendors were cursed reproved and defamed by such as maintained the usurped Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome Against which an especial Act of Parliament was made by the King and his whole Realm prohibiting thereby such Defamations and Reproofs In the Reign of King Richard the Second AGainst an Incumbent of a Church in England another sueth a Provision in the Court of Rome and there pursueth untill he recovereth the Church against the Incumbent and after brought an Action of Account against him as receiver of divers sums of money which in troth were the Oblations and Offerings which the Incumbent had received And the whole Court was of opinion against the Plaintif and thereupon he became non-suit It is declared by that Parliament that the Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in subjection to no Realm but immediately subject to God and none other and that the same ought not in any thing touching the Regalty of the same Crown be submitted to the Bishop of Rome nor the Laws and Statutes of this Realm by him frustrated or defeated at his will to the perpetuall destruction of the King his Sovereignty Crown and Regalty and of all his Realm And the Commons in that Parliament affirmed that the things attempted by the Bishop of Rome be clearly against the King's Crown and his Regalty used and approved in the time of all his Progenitors Wherefore they and all the liege Commons of the same Realm would stand with the King and his said Crown and his Regalty in the cases aforesaid and in all other cases attempted against him his Crown and his Regalty in all points to live and to die And moreover they did pray the King and him required by way of justice that he would examine all the Lords in the Parliament as well Spiritual as Temporal severally and all the States of the Parliament how they thought of the cases aforesaid which were so openly against the King's Crown and in derogation of his Regalty and how they would stand in the same cases with the King in upholding the Rights of the said Crown and Regalty Whereupon the Lords Temporal so demanded did answer every one by himself That the cases aforesaid were clearly in derogation of the King's Crown and of his Regalty as it was well known and had been of long time known and that they would stand with the same Crown and Regalty in those cases especially and in all other cases which should be attempted against the said Crown and Regalty in all points with all their power And moreover then was demanded of the Lords Spiritual there being and the Procurators of others being absent their advice and will in all those cases which Lords

extend to the said High Commissioners yet ought they to proceed according to the form and order of the said Act for an offence done against that Act. Secondly it was objected by the Counsel of the Plaintif That Caudrey the Plaintif was not deprived either by the verdict of 12 men or by confession or by the notorious evidence of the fact but by default in respect he appeared not being duely precognizated or warned which case as it was objected was Casus omissus oblivioni datus and not within the said Act. Thirdly it was objected on the behalf of the Plaintif That the said Sentence given by the said High Commissioners was utterly void for that they or any 3 or more of them having authority by force of the said Act and of the said Letters Patents under the great Seal ought to joyn in the Sentence and that one alone with the consent of 2 or more of the other Commissioners cannot give a Sentence for that every Commissioner hath equal authority and by the said Letters Patents three or more must give the Sentence with consent of others and such a Judgement given by any Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer or other Commissioners or Judges of the Common Law were utterly void and of none effect Fourthly and lastly it was objected That the said Commissioners were not nominated and appointed according to the said Act for the Jurisdiction and power given by the said Act to the Crown is to name such Commissioners as be natural-born Subjects and it doth not appear by the said special verdict that the said Commissioners were natural-born subjects And albeit the Judges as private men in their particular knowledge did know them to be natural-born subjects yet they being Judges of record ought onely to see with Judicial eyes and to take knowledge of no more then doth appear to them within the Record for upon that and not upon private knowledge out of the Record they onely must give their Judgement and upon that Record enter their Judgement also of record And seeing that the said Queen had as it was said by the Plaintif's Counsel Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction by the said Act of Parliament and by the same power was given unto her to name Ecclesiastical Commissioners she of necessity must make her nomination according to the said Act having no other power as was objected but by the said Act. And seeing it was not specially found that they were natural-born subjects de non apparentibus non existentibus eadem est ratio for this cause also the said Sentence of Deprivation was void as given by Commissioners not warranted by the said Act. Asto the first and second Objections both being grounded upon the said Act of Parliament it was resolved by the whole Court that notwithstanding these two Objections the Sentence was not to be impeached for either of them and that for three causes First for that the said Act concerning the Uniformity of Common Prayer being in the affirmative doth not abrogate or take away the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall unless words in the negative had been added as and not otherwise or in no other manner or form or to the like effect And this appeareth by the general rule of all our Books as it appeareth in 46 E. 3.4 47 E. 3.10 20 H. 6.11 36 H. 6.3 3 E. 4.27 3 H. 7.1 14 H. 7.10 15 H. 7.16 33 H. 8. Dyer 50. 4 Mar. Dyer 135. Stradlings case Pl. Com. 207. c. 2. The Ecclesiasticall Law and the Temporal Law have several proceedings and to several ends the one being Temporal to inflict punishment upon the body lands or goods the other being Spiritual pro salute Animae the one to punish the outward man the other to reform the inward And this appeareth in 12 H. 7.22 10 E. 4.10 c. Then both these distinct and several Jurisdictions consist and stand well together and do joyn in this to have the whole man inwardly and outwardly reformed 3. The Proviso in the said Act doth make this question without question for by it is provided ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and singular Archbishops and Bishops and every of their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act as well to enquire in their Visitations Synods and elsewhere within their Jurisdiction as at any other time and place to take informations of all and every the things above mentioned done committed or perpetrated within the limits of their Jurisdictions and authority and punish the same by Admonition Excommunication Sequestration or Deprivation and other Censures and Processe in like form as heretofore had been used in like cases by the Queen 's Ecclesiasticall Laws as by the said Act appeareth So as seeing if that Act had never inflicted any punishment for depraving or not observing the Book of Common Prayer yet the same being allowed and commanded to be observed for uniformity of Common Prayer and the unity and peace of the Church the Ecclesiasticall Judge may deprive such Parson Vicar c. as shall deprave or not observe the said Book as well for the first offence as he might have done by the Censures of the Church and the Ecclesiasticall Laws if no form of punishment had been inflicted by that Act. And this doth evidently appear by the said Proviso For thereby notwithstanding any thing in that Act contained they may punish such offendors by Admonition Excommunication Sequestration or Deprivation and other Censures and Processe in like form as heretofore hath been used in like cases by the Queen 's Ecclesiasticall Laws and are not bound to pursue the form prescribed by the said Act which is to punish the offendor according to the Temporal Law And it was re●olved That if the Jurisdiction of the Archbishops and Bishops and their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction were provided for by the said Act à fortiori the High Commissioners authorized by another Act in the same Parliament were tacitè provided for Ouia cui licet quod majus est non debet quod minus est non licere As to the third Objection it was also resolved by the whole Court that the Sentence given by the Bishop by the consent of his Collegues was such as the Judges of the Common Law ought to allow to be given according to the Ecclesiasticall Laws For seeing their authority is to proceed and give sentence in Ecclesiasticall causes according to the Ecclesiasticall Law and they have given a Sentence in a cause Ecclesiasticall upon their proceedings by force of that Law the Judges of the Common Law ought to give faith and credit to their Sentence and to allow it to be done according to the Ecclesiasticall Law For cuilibet in sua arte perito est credendam And this is the common received opinion of all our Books as