the Justices aforesaid that the aforesaid Plaintiff should goe quit without day c. By reason of which said premises the aforesaid Plaintiff hath been enforced and compelled to expend and lay out great sums of mony and been at very great trouble and loss about the cleering of himself and the restitution of his good name fame and reputation and the evacuating and making voyd of the aforesaid Indictment To the damage of him the said Plaintiff of 100. l. And thereupon he brings his Sute c. Not guilty pleaded to this T. Farrer Attorney for the Plaintiff I. Wem Attorney for the Defendant ACTIONS OF CONTINUANCE CONTINUANCES AFterwards the Processe being thereupon continued between the parties aforesaid Continuance of a Decem tales upon the Roll. of the aforesaid Plea put here between them in respite before the Lord the King at VVestminster untill Tuesday next after fifteen dayes from the day of Easter from thence next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors of that Jury being called some of them came and some of them came not And because the residue of the Jurors of the aforesaid Jury appeared not Therefore the Jury aforesaid is further put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill Friday next after the morrow of the holy Trinitie for want of Jurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. And he is to put ten others c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. At which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Sheriff retorns the names of the ten others of which now c. And as to the further Execution if the Writ aforesaid the Sheriff retorns that the Writ aforesaid was so lately delivered unto him that for the shortnesse of time he could not make any further Execution Therefore the Jury is further put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill Friday next after fifteen dayes of St. Michael for want of Jurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have the bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. At which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and the Jurors of that Jury some of them came and some of them came not Therefore the Jury aforesaid is further put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill Thursday next after from the day of St. Michael in three weeks for want of Jurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before Continuance upon a Summons ad Auxiliand c. came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Sheriff sent not thereupon the Writ Therefore it is commanded him as otherwise that he Summon by good Summoners the aforesaid W. that he be before c. such a day wheresoever c. to joyn himself in aid to the foresaid L. to expect and maintain that issue with the aforesaid L. if c. And further c. And as to the trying of those issues above joyned The Jury is thereupon to come before our Lord the King at the same Term wheresoever c. And who neither c. to Recognize c. Continuance of a Demurrer in Law and an Issue AT which day here came the parties aforesaid c. And because the Justices will advise themselves of and in the aforesaid Plea whereupon the parties aforesaid have above demurred in Law before they thereupon render Judgement Therefore day is given to the parties aforesaid here until eight daies of St. Hillary of hearing thereupon this judgement Because the Justices here have not as yet c. And as to the trying of the issue aforesaid between the same parties by the Countrey to be tried above joyned The Sheriff hath not sent the Writ Therefore as formerly Command is to the Sheriff that he cause to come at the same Term twelve c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. Continuance of Scire facias in a Writ of Error AT which day before our Lord he King at Westminster came the aforesaid Plaintif in a Writ of Errour in his proper person And the Sheriff sent not the Writ thereupon c. Therefore as otherwise it is Commanded the Sheriff that by honest men c. he make known to the aforesaid Defendant that he be before our Lord the King such a day wheresoever c. To hear the Record and Processe aforesaid And further c. The same day is given to the aforesaid Plaintif by the aforesaid Manuceptors c. Continuance of a Judgement after Verdict AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And because the Court of our Lord the King here of their judgement to be rendred of and upon the Premisses are not as yet advised Therefore day is given to him the said Plaintif in the same state c. is now in before our Lord the King untill such a day wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement c. AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster Continuance of an Exigent came the aforesaid Plaintif by his Attorney aforesaid And the aforesaid Defendant came not nor the Sheriff thereupon sent the Writ Therefore Command is to the Sheriff that if now he cause him to be called from County to County untill he shall be Outlawed if not c. And if c. then he shall take him and safely keep him so that he may have his body before our Lord the King such a day wheresoever c. AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster Continuance of a Distringas in Attaint came aswell the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid as the aforesaid three Jurors of the first inquisition formerly appearing in their proper persons And the Sheriff hath not sent the Writ Therefore the Jury of the tweny four Knights aforesaid remains to be taken before our Lord the King on the Morrow c. wheresoever c. for default of Jurors of the same Jury of 24. Knights c. And Command is to the Sheriff that he distrein the Jurors of the same Jury of 24. Knights by all their lands c. And that of the issues c. So that he may have their bodyes before our Lord the King at the same Term The same day is given aswell to the parties aforesaid as to the aforesaid three Jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid now appearing c. THe Jury between C. S. by his Attorney Plaintif Continuanceâ— of a Jurata for want of Juror and a Decem Tales awarded and E. R. of
the judgement in the same Record was rendred that he should be taken as if it were entred in the same Record within And nothing of Fine of that party because he is pardoned as the aforesaid I.S. by his Plea aforesaid above hath alleged And further the aforesaid chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of her Bench aforesaid by vertue of the aforesaid Writ of our Lady the Queen further certifies that having serched the Rolls of Robert Berners Phillizer of the County of S. of the Term of Easter in the 41. year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is he finds as within in these words appears That is say Pleas at Westminster before Edmund Anderson Knight and his fellows Justices of our Lady the Queen of her Bench here of the Term of Easter in the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God c. the 41. Roll 386. The Entry of the Warrant of admission with the Phillizer ss IOhn Mallows and W. E. are admitted by the Court of our Lady the Queen here to prosecute for I. S. who is within age as the next of Kindred of him the said I. S. against N. S. lately of c. Gentleman of a Plea of Trespass and assault Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned amongst the Records of this Court is filed Upon which the aforesaid I. S. sayes that in the Record and Process aforesaid nor in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid there is nothing erroniouâ— and prayes that the Court of our Lady the Queen here may proceed unto examination aswell of the Record and Process aforesaid as of the matters aforesaid above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed And because the Court of our the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and in the premises to be rendred are not as yet advised day thereupon is given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen untill eight dayes of St. Michael wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement for that the Court of our Lady the Queen here thereupon are not as yet At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this all and singular the premises being by the Court of our Lady the Queen here seen and fully understood and mature deliberation thereupon had for that that it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen here that aswell the aforesaid Writ of Certiorare to the aforesaid chief Justice of the Common Bench in form aforesaid issued and directed as the aforesaid answer of the same chief Justice of the Bench unto that Writ as now it remains filed upon Record before our Lady the Queen does not sufficiently and fully agree and answer the aforesaid allegation of the aforesaid I. S. as to the aforesaid custom oâ— the said Court of Bench for the entring of an admission of an Inâ—ant to prosecute by his next of Kindred in any his Pleas in the Rolls of the same Court where the Declaration of such infant is entred and enrolled by the aforesaid I. S. above a leged so that the same Court of our Lady the Queen before her the said Queen here for the incertaintie of the truth of such custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf in form aforesaid alleged to their judgement of and upon the premises aswel on the part of the aforesaid N. S. in deniall as on the part of the aforesaid I. S. in affirmation to the judgement aforesaid above alleged cannot proceed Without more full information of the consciences of the Justices And that the Court of our Lady the Queen here before her the said Queen of the truth of the custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf above alleged An Alias Cerâ—orare warded Therefore it is commanded the aforesaid chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid that he the full and whole certaintie and truth of the aforesaid custom of the said Court or Bench of the entrie of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next of Kindred in personall Pleas in the same Court by the aforesaid I. S. above alleged to our Lady the Queen aforesaid from the day of St. Hilary in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. doe certifie together with the Writ thereupon to him directed c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon in form aforesaid directed to her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid at the same day certified The Return of the Cerâ—â—rare that in the said Court of our Lady the Queen of the Bench is had and from the time out of mind there hath been had such a custom used and approved in the same Court of Bench that every admission of any Infant to prosecute in the same Court of Bench aforesaid by his next of Kindred in any Plea entred and inrolled and to be entred and inrolled have been used and accustomed in the Roll where the Declaration in that Plea is entred and inrolled Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned together with the return thereupon amongst the Records of this Court is filed And upon this the aforesaid I. S. further prayes that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here may proceed to the Examination aswell or the Record and Process aforesaid as of the aforesaid matters above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed and because the Court of our said Lady the Queen here are not as yet advised of and upon the rendring their judgement of and upon the premises day is thereupon further given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen Mich. Term 41. 42. Judgement was affirmed in this cause Roll. 417. untill from the day of Easter in fiftteen dayes wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement For that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here thereupon as yet have not c. ss AFterwards to wit on Saturday the 9. The affirmation of a judgment upon a Wâ—t of Error out of the Kings Bâ—â—ch into the Exchequer Chamber day of February in the 2. year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is The transcript of the Record and Process aforesaid between the parties aforesaid with all things touching them by reason of a certain Writ of our Lord the King of correcting error by them the said Thomas Scot Elizabeth and Thomas Forn of and upon the premises prosecuted before the Iustices of our said Lord the King of his Common Bench and the Barons of the Exchequer of our said Lord the King in the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid according to the form of the Statute in the Parliament of the
B. the Brother the said Moity of the said Tenements which was of his the said G. B. according to the said Custom of Gavelkind descended unto the said I. B. and unto one R. B. as Kin and Heirs of the whole bloud of the said G. B. c. namely as Sons of H. B. Brother of T. B. Father of the said T. Father of the said T. B. the Son and G. B. by which they the said I. B. and R. B. before the said time in which c. into the said Moity of the said Tenements entred and thereof were seized in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the said time in which c. thereof Infeoffed the said I. M. To have to him and his Heirs for ever by vertue of which said Feoffement the said I. M before the said time in which c. demised the said Moity unto the said I. B. for the said Term of two years yet in being as the same I. B. before hath alleged by vertue of which said demise the said I. B. of that Moity was possessed untill the said I.C. at the said time in which c. chased the said Horse out of the 20. Acres of Land as the said I. B. before complaineth Without this that it hath or from the time of which memory is not it had any such Custom in the said County of Kent that whensoever two Heirs Males Coparceners of the half bloud of whatsoever Parent begotten should be inheritable of any Lands or Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the said County and either of those Heirs should dye without Heir of his body seized of his purpart of such like Inheritance that then the other Heir Coparcener of the same Heir surviving might inherit and by all the said time was inheritable and hath inherited and ought to inherit according to that Custom that purpart of all the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind aforesaid of the other Heir so without Heir of his body dying before any other Kin of the same Heir of the whole bloud so dying without Heir of his body as the said H.C. before in pleading hath alleged And this c. whereupon from which the said H. C. the said Trespass being acknowledged prayeth judgement and his damages by reason of the said Trespass before acknowledged prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon Custom And the said H. C. as before saith that it hath and from the time which memory doth not remain it had such Custom in the said County of Kent that whensoever two Heirs Males Coparceners of the half bloud of whomsoever begotten were inheritable of any Lands or Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the same County and either of those Heirs should dye without Heir of his body seized of his put part of such like inheritance that then the other Heir Coparcener of the same Heir superviving might inherit and by all the time aforesaid was inheritable and hath inherited and ought to inherit according to that Custom the purpartie of all the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind of the said other Heir so without Heir of his body dying before any other Kin of the same Heir of the whole bloud so without Heir of his body dying as the said H. before in pleading hath alleged Enter the Court will advise before the Ven ' fac ' adjudged and a speciall rendting of his Judgement thereupon in which they were before to confer with the Justices of the Bench and a Writ of Ven ' fac ' of the body of the County of Kent should be awarded And of this he putteth himself upon the Country and the said I. B. likewise And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof c. issues aforesaid between the said parties before joyned will advise before any Writ of Venir fac ' to the Jury to try the issue should be adjudged day is given to the said parties before the Lady the Queen in what State now untill in 8. days of St. Hillary whensoever c. then to attend and hear the Order or Judgement of the said Court of and upon the premises for that that the Court of the Lady the Queen thereof c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster commeth the said parties by their said Attorneys And c. And so it was continued by 10. Terms then next following c. And in this thing the inspection and view diligently aswell the said issues as in all and singular the premises by the Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench is to be had and consulted with for that the Tryall of the said Issue doth touch and concern the Comunalty of the said County and it is the Custom that a Writ to call a Jury to try that Issue of the body of the said County of Kent should Issue forth and should be directed to the Sheriff of the same County by which the command is to the Sheriff of the same County that he should cause to come before the Lord the King in 8. dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever Ven ' fac ' of the body of the County of Kent awarded c. 24. aswell Knights c. of the body of the said County by whom c. And who neither c. to recognize c. because aswell c. the same day is given to the said parties there c. AND the said W. saith Plaintif saith that he held the said twenty acres of Land of the said Prior by Fealty Sure of Court and the rent of four shillings and for that rent behind the said Priaccustomed to distrain Without this that the Prior was seized of the Rent-charge as c. that the said R. B. the taking of the said Cattell and Chattells in the said place in which c. ought not to acknowledge just c. because he saith that he himself was seized of the said Ten acres of Land with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized the same twenty acres of Land with th'appurtenance held of the aforesaid T. late Prior of the said Church by Fealty and Sute to the Court of him the said late Prior of his Mannor of I. in C. aforesaid to be held from three weeks to three weeks and by the Rent of four shillings unto the said late Prior at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell yearly to be paid And the said W. M. and all those whose estate he hath in those twenty acres of Land held those twenty acres of Land with th' appurtenances of the said late Prior and his Predecessors heretofore Priors of the said Church by that Service and Rent in the right of the said Church from time out of mind held and by all the said time the said late Prior and all
a Plea of Debt put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill such day c. unless c. first c. at such a place c. by the form of the Statute c. Come for default of Jurors At which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorney aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices before whom c. have sent here the Record of the Jury aforesaid before them had in these words Afterwards at the day and place aforesaid reciting the Record untill came as well the within named c. as the within written c. And the Jury likewise called some of them came and some of them came not as appears in the Panell c. Therefore as formerly the Jury aforesaid is put in respite before our Lord the King c. untill c. Therefore the Sheriff c. is to put ten such c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster Continuance upon a matter in Law and Verdict came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And because the Court of our Lord the King here aswell of their judgement upon the Verdict aforesaid as of their judgement of the matter in Law above pleaded to be rendred are not as yet advised Day is thereupon further given to the said parties in the state wherein they are now before the Lord the King at Westminster untill eight dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement c. for that the Court of our Lord the King here is not as yet c. Continuance in Attaine where the Sheriff Retoâ—â—s not the Writ and out of the assent of the parties the Jury is not taken AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came as well the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid as the aforesaid seven Jurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid formerly appearing in proper person And the Sheriff Retorns the Writ to our Lord the King thereupon in all things prepared and executed But the Jurors of those twenty four Knights aswell of the assent of the parties aforesaid and the aforesaid seven Jurors of the former Inquisition aforesaid as of the Jurors aforesaid of the twenty four Knights remains to be taken before our Lord the King untill the Morrow c. wheresoever c. And Command is to the Sheriff that he distrein the Jurors of the same Jury of twenty four Knights by all their lands c. And that of the Issues c. And that he have their bodies c. before our Lord the King at the same Term c. the same day is given aswell to the parties aforesaid as to the aforesaid seven Jurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid now appearing c. Continuance by a Writ of adjournment BEfore which day the Plaint aforesaid was adjourned by the Writ of our Lord the King of Common adjournment untill eight dayes of St. Hillary then next following wheresoever c. At which said eight dayes of St. Hillary the Plaint aforesaid was further adjourned by the Writ of our Lord the King of Common adjournment untill from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes unto the Castle of Hertford At which day c. Continuance of the Jurata where the Plaintif acknowledgeth one of the Defendants to be dead AT which day came aswell the aforesaid P. as the aforesaid R. by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid P. sayes that the aforesaid A. is dead c. Therefore against him nothing is further thereupon to be done c. And thereupon the parties aforesaid now appearing The Sheriff thereupon sent not the Writ c. Therefore as formerly the Jury aforesaid is put in respite before our Lord the King untill in eight daies c. wheresoever c. for default of Jurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid now appearing c. Continuance of a Jurata by the assent of the parties THe Jury between I. S. Esquire Plaintif and T. W. of c. of a Plea of Trespass put in respite here untill such a day c. aswell of the assent of the parties aforesaid as of the Iurors of the same Iury now here at this day to wit from the day of Easter c. appearing Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. THe Iury between T. W. Gent. by his Attorney Plaintif Jurata which serves either for debt trespass or Ejectione firme And G.D. of c. of such a Plea put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill Tuesday next after Eight dayes of Saint Michael unlesse the Iustices of the Assizes of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken first on Monday the eighth day of August at Newark upon Trent in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. Come for default of Iurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have the bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. And it is to be known that the Writ of our Lord the King thereupon the fourth day of July in this self-same Term before our Lord the King at Westminster is delivered of Record to the Deputie of the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in form of Law to be Executed under a penaltie c. UNless the beloved and faithfull c. John Popham Knight This difference in Guild-hall London before the Chief Justice Chief Iustice of our Lord the King of the Pleas in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King assigned to be held first on Saturday next after c. at Gild-hall London by form of the Statute c. as in the next before ACTIONS of COMMITTITVR COMMITTITUR Committitur of a Prisoner to the Marshall being under the Custodie of the Sheriff by a Case AFterwards to wit the twenty fifth day of May then next following before our Lord the King at Westminster came W. R. in his proper person under the Custody of the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in Execution for the damages aforesaid by vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Capias ad satisfaciendum to him the said Sheriff of and upon the Premisses directed which said R. is committed to the Marshall c. there to remain untill c. according to the form of the judgement aforesaid c. Committitur of a Prisoner upon a Case COmmand was to the Sheriff that he should take c. Whereof he is Convict And now here know aswell the aforesaid A. by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant in his proper person by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid brought to the Bar And the Sheriff now retorns that he took the bodies of him the said Defendant And
Lady Elizabeth are Queen of England at Westminster the 23. day of November in the 27. year of her Reign held and published from the aforesaid Court of our Lord the King that now is here before him the said King were transmitted And the aforesaid T. S. E. and T. Fen in the same Court of the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid have assigned divers matters for Errors in the Record and Process aforesaid for revoking and annihilating of the judgement aforesaid to which the same E. and R. in the same Court appearing pleaded that neither in the Record nor Process aforesaid nor in the rendring the judgment aforesaid there was in any thing Error Afterwards to wit on Saturday the 9. day of Pebruary in the aforesaid second year of our said Lord the King in the same Court of Exchequer Chamber aforesaid the premises being seen and by the Court of our Lord the King here diligently examined and fully understood Aswell the Record and Process aforesaid and the judgement aforesaid upon the same rendred as the aforesaid causes of Errors aforesaid by the aforesaid T. S. E. and T. F. above alleged and assigned For that that it seems to the Court here that the Record aforesaid is in nothing vitious and defective And that the Record aforesaid was in nothing Erronious Therefore it was considered if that the judgement aforesaid in all things be affirmed and continue in all his force strength and effect notwithstanding in any thing the said causes of Error above assigned and alleged And further it was considered of in the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid that the aforesaid E. R. should recover against the aforesaid T. S. E. and T. F. 100. s. to them the said E. and R. of their assent by the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid adjudged according to the form of the Statute thereupon published and provided for the damages costs and charges which they had by delay of the Execution of the judgement aforesaid by reason of the prosecution of the aforesaid Writ of Error And thereupon the Record and Process before the aforesaid Justices of the common Bench and Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid in the premises had They the same Justices of the Common Bench and Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid before our said Lord the King wheresoever c. they remit according to the form of the Statute aforesaid which to the said Court of our Lord the King now reciding c. ACTIONS OF ESCAPE ESCAPE R L. Executrix of the testament Escape against a Sheriff upon an Arrest upon a Bill of Middlesex c. complains of S. S. and H. C. lately Sheriffs of the County of Middlesex in the Custodie of the Marshall c. For that that is to say whereas one G. S. of c. such a day and year at London in the Parish c. by his certain writing obligatory with the Seal of him the said G. sealed and in due manner made bearing date the same day and year acknowledged himself to be bound and firmly obliged to the aforesaid I. in his life time in 20. s. of lawfull mony of England to be payd to him the said I. when he should be thereunto required with a condition thereupon indorsed for true payment of 12. s. of like mony c. upon the day of the Feast of the Ascension of our Lord then next following which said 12. s. the aforesaid G. to the aforesaid I. in his life time or to the aforesaid R. after his the said I. his death he hath not paye but the aforesaid G. forfeited the aforesaid 20. s. to the aforesaid I. in the writing obligatory conteined For the more speedy recovery of which said sum of 20. â— the aforesaid R. after the death of the aforesaid I. her Husband to wit in the Term of Easter in the 27. year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is before her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster had come and obteined out of the same Court of the Lady the Queen before her the said Queen a certain precept of her the said Lady the Queen directed to the then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Middlesex By which it was commanded to them the said then Sheriffs that they should take the aforesaid G. if c. And safely c. So that they might have his body before our Lady the Queen at Westminster on Friday next after the morrow of the holy Trinity then next following to answer the aforesaid R. of a Plea of Trespass And that they should have there then that Precept to that intent that the same R. as executrix of the testament of the aforesaid l. in the same Court of our Lady the Queen here might declare and prosecute her Bill against the aforesaid G. for the debt aforesaid by the aforesaid writing obligatory done which said Precept the aforesaid R. afterwards to wit such a day and year and place delivered the aforesaid Sheriffs in form of Law to be executed by force of which said precept the aforesaid S. S. and H. B. then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Middlesex afterwards and before the return of the same to wit such a day and year at I. in the aforesaid County of Middlesex took and arrested the aforesaid G. And him the said G. under their safe custodie then and there had and deteyned And he the said G. being so in custody of them the said late Sheriffs They the said late Sheriffs afterwards to wit the aforesaid such a day and year led the aforesaid G. unto the City of London And him there so negligently kept that the same G. afterwards to wit the same such a day and year at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid from the custody of them the said late Sheriffs did goe away and Escape And they the said late Sheriffs him the said G. to go at large whithersoever he would they did permit the aforesaid R. of the aforesaid 20. s. then and as yet being in no wise satisfied And the said G. being so gone away Escaped and permitted to goe at large from the custody of them the aforesaid late Sheriffs as aforesaid the same G. kept himself so secretly and privately that she the said R. could not procure any Writs or precepts to be served upon the aforesaid G. for the recovery of her debt aforesaid By which the same R. sayes that she hath not only Expended lost and let goe divers great Expences and Charges in and about the aforesaid Arrest of the aforesaid G. but also remains totally frustrate of all other remedy for the recovery of the debt aforesaid whereupon she saith that she is worsted and hath damage to the value of 40. s. And thereupon she brings her sute c. And she brings here into Court the Letters testamentary c. The Defendants plead they did make the Arrest And the aforesaid S. H. by T.B. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that the
E. who prosecutes for our Lord the King in that behalfe for the same Lord the King sayes that Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of our Lord King Henry the 6th late King of England held at Westminster in the 23th yeare of his Raign amongst other things it is ordained and established that no Sherife undersherife Baylife of any Liberty or franchise or any other Baylife by occasion or colour of his Office should take any other thing by them c. and so recite the Statute And that all Sherifes under-Sherifes Bayliffs of liberties or other Bayliffes or any other Officers or Ministers who should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid or any the Articles in the same should loose to the party grieved in that behalfe his damages to the trouble and should forfeit the summe of fortie pound each Sherife wherein he or any of them should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid Whereof the Lord the King was to have one Moyetie to the use of his houshold and no other wayes and to him who in that behalfe will prosecute another moyetie thereof as in the same Statute more fully is contained yet the aforesaid Defendant little weighing the aforesaid Statute such a day and yeare then being under-Sherife of the County aforesaid at such a place by colour of his Office aforesaid took Extortiously of one I. D. by the hands of one R. W. for the making and returning of a certaine pannell upon a Writ of Venire facias at the Suit of the aforesaid I. D. against R. H. and others in the same Writ contained in a Plea of trespasse prosecuted thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme and effect of the Statute aforesaid by which the Action accrued to the said Lord the King to require and have of the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid forty pound yet the aforesaid Defendant allthough often required c. the aforesaid forty pounds to the said Lord the King he hath not as yet rendered it but the same to him hitherto to render he hath denyed and as yet doth denie Whereupon c. The Defendant pleads that he took not against the form of the Statute AND the aforesaid Defendant by W.C. his Attorney comes c. and sayes our aforesaid Lord the King him the said Defendant by occasion of the premises in an thing to impeach or trouble ought not because he saith that he took not of the aforesaid I. D. the aforesaid thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme of the Statute aforesaid as the aforesaid I. C. for our Lord the King aforesaid above hath alleaged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. which c. for our Lord the King in like manner c. Therefore c. VVITHERNAM WIlts ss Command was to the Sheriffe as it was often commanded him Entries of a Plure Replegiare that instantly and without delay he should cause to be replevyed to R. D. his cattell which E.P. I. D.W.S. and W. W. took and unjustly detained or that he should be before our Lady the Queen in eight dayes of Saint Hillary last past wheresoever The Sherife returnes the cattell were so farre off remved c. c. to shew wherefore the command of our Lady the Queen so oftentimes thereupon to him directed he had contemned and the same Sherife to her the said Lady the Queen at that day returned that the Cattell aforesaid were removed afarr off to a place unknown unto him by the aforesaid E.P. others so that he could not have the view of them Therefore command was to the same Sherife The entrie of a Withernam and Pone that of the cattell of the aforesaid E P. and others in his Bailywick he should take in Withernam and the same to the aforesaid R.D. he should cause to be delivered to be held to him untill the aforesaid E. and others would deliver the cattell aforesaid and in what manner he should have executed the same precept he should make known to our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. The returne of the Writ Command was also to the same Sherife that if the aforesaid R.D. should make him secure of prosecuting his Complaint as also of returning the cattell aforesaid if the returne thereupon should be adjudged then he should put by sure and safe pledges the aforesaid E.P. and others that they should be before our Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Term to answer the aforesaid R. D. of the taking and detaining of the cattell aforesaid At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid R. D. by M. Moseley his Attorney And the Sherife returned that the aforesaid R. D. had made him the said Sherife secure of prosecuting his Complaint aforesaid and of the returne of the cattell aforesaid if the returne hereupon should be adjudged and that the aforesaid E.P. is attached by Pledges of W.P. and G.G. as also that the aforesaid I.T. W.S. and W.W. hath nothing within his Baily-wick whereby they can be attached The same Sherife also returnes that he the 24th of March in the one and twentieth year of the Raign of our Lady E. now Quen of England took in Withernam two horses whereof one is of Colour white and the oâ—her very gray and three Maâ—â—s whereof one is of a bay Colour another of a Gray colour and another of a daple Gray and eighteen Sheep of the Cattell of the aforesaid E.F. and others and the same to the aforesaid R. D. he hath caused to be delivered to be held unto him untill the said E. and others the cattell aforesaid formerly taken they will deliver as it was commanded unto him and the aforesaid E. P. and others the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called by R. Best their Attorney in like manner came upon which the aforesaid D. declaring aganst the aforesaid E. P. and others complaines that they such a day and yeare at Lockeridge in the Parish of Fifeeld in the County aforesaid in a certaine place there called the Common Field took the cattell of him the said Robert that is to say six Geldings of the price of 24. l. and them unjustly detained against Sureties and Pledges c. Whereupon he saith he is worsted and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he brings his Suit c. Judgement for the Plaintiff in a Replevin upon a Demurrer in Law Easter 30. Eliz Rot. 196. THE Plaintiff declares and the Defendant pleads in acknowledgment c. and the Plaintiff pleads in Bar and the Defendants rejoines to the Bar and thereupon the Plaintiff demurs in Law and they join in Demurrer and Judgment was had for the Plaintiff as followes Because as yet c. at which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Vpon which all and singular the premises being seen
have alleged and that the aforesaid I. R. and H. were of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances seised in their Demesn as of Fee untill the aforesaid G. W. and R. them the said I. and H. thereof unjustly and without judgement but not by force nor Arms they did disseize and they Assess the damages of them the said I. and H. by occasion of the premises aforesaid above their expences and costs by them about the prosecution of this Assize layd out to thirteen shillings and four pence Judgement upon the verdict and for those expences and costs to twenty shillings Therefore it is considered that the aforesaid I. R. and H. shall recover the seisin of the Tenements aforesaid in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the view of the Reviewers of the Assize aforesaid and their damages and costs aforesaid above assessed which said damages in the whole amount unto thirty three shillings and four pence and the aforesaid G.VV. and R. in mony c. Mony c. SIr Iohn Knill and Hugh Lochard have arraigned an Assize of novell disseisin against G. H. and others The charge given to the Jury upon the foregoing assize and supposeth them to be disseised of their Free-hold in H. and have made their claim for a Messuage and eighteen Acres of Land with the appurtenances thereunto hath come the same G. by his Attorney and saith that the Assize thereof between him and the said I. R. and H. L. ought not to be for that he saith as in his Plea and the aforesaid W. and others Defendants say that they have done no wrong nor no disseisin unto the said Plaintiff of the aforesaid Tenements and of that they have put them upon the Assize and the Plaintiff also and then rehearse further the title of the Plaintiff in his reputation and the issue that is joyned thereupon and then thus so your charge is whether that W. B. dyed seised in his Demesn as of Fee of the Messuage and eighteen acres of Land put in view and specified in the Plaint as the said G. H. hath alleged in his Bar or not and also whether the said W. H. and other Defendants disseised the Plaintiffs of the Tenements aforesaid or not if you find that the same W. B. dyed not seised as the Plaintiff hath alleged you shall enquire whether the Plaintiffs were seised of the Tenements put in view and specified in the Plaint in their Demesn as of Freehold and disseised by all the Defendants or any of them and whether the disseisin was done with force or not and if you find the said A.B. dyed not seised and that the Plaintffs were seised of the Tenements and disseised by the Defendants or some or any of them you shall enquire what damage the Plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the disseisin and also for the costs about the sute of this Assize and if you find that W. B. dyed seised in his Demesn as of Fee and that the Defendant disseised not the Plaintiff you shall enquire no further and this is your charge c. ACTIONS OF AUDITA QUERELA AUDITA QUERELA ss THE Lady the Queen hath sent to her Justices of the Pleas assigned to be held before her Audita Querela upon an Escape by a Bailiff of a Libertie her Writ in these words ss Ellzabeth c. To our Justices of Pleas in our Court before us assigned to be held Greeting Wee have received by the grievous complaint of Thomas Boyton of c. in the County of Suffolk Clerk otherwise called c. That whereas one William Andrews Citizen c. and Lewis Simpson Citizen c. London lately in our Court before us at Westminster by Bill without our Writ and by the judgement of the same Court had recovered against him the said Thomas aswell a certain debt of 100. pounds as 10. pounds for their Damages which they susteined aswell by occasion of the detention of that debt as for their Expences and costs c. layd out whereof he is Convict And although after the rendring of that Judgement to wit the second day of July in the the 31. year of our Reign at Saint Edmonds Burie in the County of Suffolk that is to say within the Libertie and Franchise then of Roger Townsend Knight and Willam Drue Esquire of St. Edmonds Bury in the aforesaid County of Suffolk the same Thomas by John Pridie and Henry Doy by vertue of a certain Warrant lately before to the aforesaid John Pridie and Henry by the aforesaid Roger Townsend and William Drue made and directed by vertue of a certain Warrant to them the said Roger and William Dixie by one Philip Tilvey Esquire then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk under the Seal of his Office made of and upon a certain VVrit of Capias ad fatisfaciendum o' the aforesaid William Andrews and Lewis Sympson of the Debt and Damages aforesaid lately before at the prosecution of them the said W. A. and L. from our said Court before us issued and to the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk lately before directed and delivered VVhich said Roger Townsend and William Dixie then that is to say the aforesaid second day of July in the aforesaid 31. year of our Reign and before and after had full Retorn of all and all manner of Writs and Warrants within the Libertie aforesaid to be Executed and the Execution of them In Execution of and for the Debt and Damages aforesaid was then taken and arrested And in Execution deteined untill afterwards to wit the third day of November in the 31 year aforesaid the aforesaid K. T. and W D. the same T. B. at Lamby hath in this County of Surrey the Debt and Damages aforesaid to the aforesaid William Andrews and Lewis Sympson being in no wise satisfied permitted him to goe whether he would at large As the same Thomas by divers wayes and means which are convenient is ready to make appear yet the same W. and L. by reason of the judgement aforesaid for the Debt and Damages aforesaid against him the said Thomas in our said Court before us now lately prosecuteth And him upon that occasion to take and in our Prison under the Custodie of our Marshall of our Marshalsees before us to be deteined most unjustly have procured to his the said T. B. no little loss and grievance and against the Law of our Realm of England Whereupon he hath humbly implored us to provide for him in that behalf a fit remedie And because we would not that the aforesaid T. B. should in that behalf be in any manner injured and being willing to doe what is just VVee Command you that having heard the Complaint of the aforesaid T. B. in this behalf and calling before you the parties aforesaid and hearing hereto thereupon their severall reasons to him the said T. B. you should cause to be had full and speedy Justice as of right and according to the Law
knowing the aforesaid T. to be a fugitive and deceiptfull person and plotting and intending him the said H.C. to hinder from the recoverie of his debt aforesaid and to cause him the said H.C. what in him lay wholly to lose his debt aforesaid the aforesaid T. before the aforesaid Justices of our Lady the Queen here at or ever after the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the aforesaid Writ he had not but the same T. he the said H. C. of his said debt aforesaid being in no wise satisfied or in any manner contented before the retorn of the same Writ to wit such a day and year at London c. in the Parish c. he suffered to go at large whithersoever he would in the danger of the losse of the debt of the aforesaid H. C. For that if the aforesaid H. A. had had the aforesaid T. before the Justices of our Lady the Queen here at the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the Writ aforesaid and the aforesaid Arrest then the same T. ought to have found in the Court here to him the said H. C. sufficient Manucaptors who must have undertaken for the aforesaid T. that if the same T. should be Convict in the Debt aforesaid that then he the said T. should pay the debt aforesaid to him the said H.C. or should render himself to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the Judgement of and upon the Premisses to be rendred or that they the said Manucaptors the debt aforesaid for the aforesaid T should pay to him the said H. C. And if the same T. did not find such Manucaptors that then he should be committed to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to stay untill he should do it To the damage of him the said H. C. a hundred pounds And thereupon he brings his Sure c. And the aforesaid H. A. by Thomas Foster his Attorney comes and defends the force and injurie when c. Not guilty pleaded And sayes that he is in nothing guilty of the Premisses above imposed upon him And of this he puts himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. C. in like manner Therefore Command is given to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in eight dayes of the Purification of the blessed Virgin Mary and c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. This was tried in London and a Verdict and Judgement for the Plaintif And a Writ of Error was brought and assigned for Error For that it appears not in what place the Bailiff of the Libertie delivered the Prisoner to the aforesaid F. the under-Sheriff nor whether he was delivered in the County of Essex or no. Error also for that he said not in his Declaration that the Defendant took no securitie for the appearance aforesaid for it might be that the Sheriff delivered him up upon Bayl according to the form of of the Statute Error also for that the Plaintif said not that the aforesaid T. appeared not in the Bench. Afterwards the Defendant after he had pleaded in nullo est Erratum died And then was made this Entrie following as yet c. Afterwards to wit the fifth day of May in the Four and thirtieth year of the reign of our Lady the Queen that now is before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And sayes that the aforesaid H. C. is dead and prayes licence to purchase a new Writ of Error c. And it is granted unto him c. And afterwards to wit the sixt day of May then next following before our Lady the Queen at Wistminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And brought before our Lady the Queen a certain new Writ of Error of our Lady the Queens directed to the Justices of our Lady the Queen of the Pleas before her the said Queen assigned to be held which said Writ follows in these words Elizabeth c. And so recite the Writ of Error And upon this the same H.A. says that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erronious alleging for Errors the severall matters above assigned And the same H.A. sayes further that the aforesaid H.C. before his death to wit at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid made his last VVill and Testament in writing And thereby Constituted and ordeined Elizabeth his then wife Executrix of his Testament aforesaid and there afterwards died And the same H. A. prayes a VVrit of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Executrix of being here c. retornable on the morrow of the holy Trinitie c. wheresoever c. At which day came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney And the aforesaid Defendant by John Williams her Attorney came And upon this the aforesaid H. A. as formerly sayes That in the Record and Premisses aforesaid c. it is manifestly Erronious And the Executrix pleads that it is in nothing Erronious and so they continue it for argument And afterwards upon full debate judgement was affirmed ACTIONS OF DEBT AND DIVERS OTHER Actions and Pleas. DEBT ss W C. Complaineth of I.H. in the Custody of the Marshall c. of a plea A Declaration in Debt upon a Bill to be paid at the day of Marriage of the Defendant that he render unto him 20 l. of good and lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid I. in such a day and year at c. by his certain Bill Obligatory sealed with the Seal of him the said I and unto the Court c. whose date c. acknowledged himself to owe unto the said W. the aforesaid 20. l. to be paid unto the said W. at the day of the Marriage of him the said I and the said W. in fact saith that the said I. afterwards that is to say in such a day and year c. married to wife one M.A. by which an Action did accrue unto the said W to require c. ss W. B. next of Kin of R.B. deceased Declaration in Debt for an Administrator against an Administrator Administrator of all and singular the Goods Chattels rights and Credits which where of R.B. late of H. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman otherwise called c. deceased which dyed intestate complaineth of A.N. Widow Administrator of all and singular the goods and chattels rights and credits which were of R.N. late of F. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman deceased in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea that he render unto him 60. l. of lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid R.N. in his life that is
manner whatsoever And whereas also all and singular Pleas of whatsoever trespasses speeches and publishing of scandalous English words whatsoever touching and concerning the Banckruptery or insufficiency or poverty of any person being a Merchant at the time of the speaking or publishing of the same scandalous English words and all other such Pleas and matters onely are not of the Test or Jurisdiction but doe specially appertein and belong to their now Queen and her Regall Crown and by the Lawes of the Land of this Kingdome of the said Queen of England they ought not in any manner whatsoever to be tryed ended and discussed before the Admirall or by the Admirall or by his Deputy and from the time of mans memory they ought and were accustomed to be tryed c. by the Lawes of the Land Notwithstanding which one John Raynes Merchant of the City of London not being ignorant of the Premisses cunningly devising and intending the same J. Osborn against the due form of the Law of this Kingdom of England unduly to grieve oppress and weary out and the said now Queen and her Regall Crown to dis-inherit and also the Cognizance of a Plea which to the same Queen and her Regall Crown in this behalf and not to the Court of Admiralty doth belong to another Tryall in the Court of Admiralty to draw him the said J. O. in the Court of Admiralty before the Worshipfull and excellent man The stile of the Judge in the Court Admirall Mr. David Lewis Doctor of Lawes chief President of the Court of Admiralty or his lawfull Deputy or other competent Judge in this behalf whatsoever of and for the protestation of the insufficiencie and disabling of the said John Raynes Merchant being as before is spoken of and of and for the speaking publishing and affirming of the English words following that is to say c. as by the Libell of him the said J.R. against him the said Jo. Osborn exhibited and here profered to the Court more plainly it may and doth appear where in truth the speaking publishing and affirming of the said scandalous words and the aforesaid protestation by the said J. O. before supposed to be done in the said Libell specified if any or which like speech divulging affirming or Protestation were had and done at Guilford in the County of Surrey and not upon the main Sea nor within the Maritine Jurisdiction And the said J.R. the same J. O. in the said Court of the said Admiralty to condemn and the said J. R. of and in the Premisses to answer with all his Forces as yet endevoureth and from day to day cunningly deviseth And although the said John Osborn all and singular the Premisses in the Court of the said Admiralty before the aforesaid Judge of the Court of that Admiralty for his discharge in the Premisses had often pleaded alleged and brought inevitable testimony to prove Notwithstanding which the Judge of the Court of that Admiralty altogether refused to admit that Plea and allegation in contempt of the said now Queen and to the manifest damage prejudice impoverishment and grief of him the said John O. And this the said J.O. is ready to prove whereupon the said John here most humbly imploring the gracious Ayd of the Court of the said Queen prayeth remedy and the Writ of Prohibition of the said Queen to be directed to the Judge of the Court of that Admiralty to prohibit him that he in no wise should any further hold the aforesaid Plea of the Premisses in any manner whatsoever depending before him c. And it is granted unto him c. ACTIONS OF REPLEVIN REPLEVIN ss AND the said R. R. by T.S. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and Injury when Defendant justifies the taking of the Cattell for Rent behinds c. And doth well avouch the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. And justly c. because he saith that the said place in which c. is and from the time of the said taking and before was one acre of Land in R. aforesaid and saith that long before the time of the said taking before supposed to be done and at the same time the said R. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of one Messuage one Garden ten acres and half an acre of land and two acres of Wood with th' appurtenances in R. aforesaid whereof the said place in which c. is And at the said time in which c. was parcell And so being thereof seized that same Messuage Garden land and Wood with th'appurtennaces long before the time of the taking aforesaid that is to say at the Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle in the year of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the fourth after the Conquest brother of the Lord the now King 22. at R. aforesaid Demised unto the foresaid I.A. To have to him from the same Feast as long as it should please him the said R. yielding therefore yearly unto the said R. as long as the said J. should have and occupy the said Messuage Garden Land and Wood 21. shillings at the Feast of Pentecost and Andrew the Apostle by equall portions yearly to be paid by virtue of which Demise the said I.A. the said Messuage Garden land and wood with th' appurtenances from the said Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle untill the Feast of Saint Andrew the Apostle next before the time of the taking aforesaid had and occupied And for that that 21. shillings of the said Lease by the said time unto him the said R. at the time of the said computation remained in arrear and as yet remaineth unpaid doth well avouch the taking of the sayd Cattell in the said place in which c. and justly c. And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and the return of the said Cattell to be adjudged unto him c. Plaintif saith that before the Defendant had any thing one N. was seized of the Premisses and afterward the said Land descended to the Wife of the Plaintif as Heir of N. by which the Plaintif claimed the Tenements in hereditarie right and that the Defendant had nothing in the Tenements unlesse by Intrusion Claim ss ANd the said J. A. saith that the said R. the taking of the said Cattell in the foresaid place in which c. by any matter before alleged that he ought not to avouch the same to be just because he saith that long before the time of the said Caption and long before the said R. had any thing in the said Messuage Garden land and Wood with th' appurtenances one N. A. was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee and dyed of such his estate thereof seized after whose death the right of the aforesaid Tenements with th'appurtenaces descended unto one T. A his Son and Heir of him the said N. and the said R. after the death of the said N. into
the said Homage fealty and sute of Court as of fee and right and of the said Rent and residue of the said Services in his Demesn as of Fee And because the sute of him the said T. H. at the Court of the said R. A. held at his said Mannor on fryday next after the Epiphany of our Lord in the fourteenth year of the reign of the now King unto the said R. A. remaining undone the said R. A. doth well avow the taking of the said Cattel in the said place in which c. as in parcell of the said tenement of him the said R. A. in form aforesaid held and upon the said T. H. as upon his true Tenant thereof c. And within his fee c. And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth judgment and the return of the said Cattel to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant protesting that he did not hold the premisses by the services in the avowment of the Plantif specifyed and that the Defendant was not of the same seized c. for Plea saith that he holdeth by fealty 3. shillings tent onely without this that he holdeth as above And the said T. H. saith that the said R. A. by any thing before alleged the taking of the said Cattel ought not to avow just because protesting that the said T. doth not the said Messuage and Virge of land with th' appurtenances of the foresaid R. A. by the said services in the avowment of him the said R. before specified c. And protesting also that the said R. A. was not seized of the said services by the hands of him the said T. in manner and form as the said R. A. before hath alleged for Plea saith that the said T. doth hold the said Messuage and Virge of land of the aforesaid R. A. as of his Mannor of B. by fealty and the Rent of three shillings onely for all services and ancient demands without this that the said R. A. was seized of the said services to doe sute at the Court of him the said R. A. of his said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held and of the residue of the said services in manner and form as the said R. A. in his said avowment before hath alleged and this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. And the said R. A. saith Issue upon the Tenure that the said R. was seized of the said Services to do Sute to the Court of him the said R. of his said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held and of the residue of the said Services in manner and form as the said R. before hath alleged And of this he putteth himself upon the Country and the said T. likewise c. ss AND the said I.T. and H. by R. M. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when The form of a Plea where the Defendant took more Beasts and Chattels than the Plaintif by his Declaration supposeth himself to have taken the Defendants say as to one Horse they did not take as to the residue say that he the said J.D. one of the Defendants in right of his Wife was seized of the Mannor of D. of which Mannor the Plaintif holdeth ten acres of land wherof c. of the Defendant by Fealty and four shillings Rent and to do Sute of Court and a Fine was leavyed of the same Mannor between W.F. Plaintif and the said I. E. and his Wife and that afterwards the said W. F. granted the said Mannor unto the said I.E. and his Wife and to the Heirs of their bodies c. in Fee-tayl and that after the Plaintif attorned unto them the said I. P. and his Wife and because the said Rent was behind the Defendants took the Beasts c. c. and as to the taking of one Horse of the said Horses they the said J. and H. say that they did not take that Horse in manner and form as the said Prioress before against them complaineth And of this they put themselves upon the Country And the said Prioress likewise c. And the said I. and H. further say that they at the time in which the taking of the said Cattell is supposed to be done they took four Horses of the said five Horses in the said Declaration specified and also one Cart with six Stacks of Barley in the same Cart being with the whole Tacklyn to the sayd Cart belonging that is to say Cartharness for the said four Horses in the same Cart to be drawn of the said Oxen and Cattell of the said Piroress in the said place in which c. which said four Horses and the said Cart with the said six Stacks of Barley in the same Cart being and the said Cattell that is to say the tackling of the said Cart called Horse Harness for the said four Horses drawing that Cart of I.N. Knight Sheriff of the said County at the Complaint of the said Prioress unto the said Prioress caused to be replevyed and of the said four Horses and Chattells the said I. in his own right and of Anne his Wife doth well avow And the said Hen. as Bailiff of the same I. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. and justly c. because he saith that the said place in which c. doth contein in it self ten acres of land with th' appurtenances in C. aforesaid whereof the said Prioress at the said time in which c. long before c. was seised in her Demesn as of Fee in the right of her said Monastery and so thereof being seized held the same of the said I. and A. his Wife in the right of her the said A. as of her Mannor of D. in the said C. of K. by Fealty and the Rent of 4. shillings every year at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell to be paid and by Service to do Sute at the Court of them the said I. and A. of their said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held of which Services the said I. and A. in the right of her the said A. were seized by the hands of the said Prioress as by the hands of their then true Tenant that is to say of Fealty and Sute of the said Court as of Fee and in right and of the said Rent in their Demesn as of Fee And them the said I. and A. in the right of her the said A. so of the said Mannor Rent and Services being seized long before the said time A Fine levied where the wise is Cognisee seized of the lands acknowledged in which c. that is to say in Eight dayes of St. Michael in the 21. year of Henry late King of England and France the seventh from the Conquest in the Court of him the said late King