Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	action_n	defendant_n	verdict_n	2,409	5	11.0051	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A45252	The arguments of Sir Richard Hutton, Knight, one of the judges of the Common Pleas, and Sir George Croke, Knight, one of the judges of the Kings Bench together with the certificate of Sir John Denham, Knight, one of the Barons of the Exchequer, vpon a scire facias brought by the Kings Majesty in the Court of Exchequer against John Hampden, Esquire : as also, the severall votes of the Commons and Peeres in Parliament, and the orders of the Lords for the vacating of the judgement given against the said Mr. Hampden, and the vacating of the severall rolls in each severall court, wherein the judges extrajudiciall opinions in the cases made touching ship-money are entred.	England and Wales. Court of Exchequer.; Hutton, Richard, Sir, 1561?-1639.; Croke, George, Sir, 1560-1642.; Denham, John, Sir, 1559-1639.; Hampden, John, 1594-1643, defendant.; England and Wales. Parliament.; England and Wales. Sovereign (1625-1649 : Charles I)	1641 (1641)	Wing H3842; ESTC R16237	74,278	200

making up of the Sea walls and this is done by a Jury But this charge cannot bee laid upon a County or Towne in generall but particular men that have benefit or losse or may have losse or benefit thereby And this is done upon inquiry of a Jury before the Sheriffe or Commissioners appointed So it is at this day upon the Commission of Sewers as appeareth by Coke lib. 10. fol. 142. in the Case of the Isle of Ely That the Taxation by the Commissioners of Sewers must bee upon every particular man that hath or may have loss or benefit by such inundations and making up the walls and cannot be laid upon any remote parts which are out of the levell of such losse or benefit And it must be certaine and particular upon persons certaine by reason of land or profit and cannot bee laid in generall but in these Cases there is a particular losse or benefit and in particular places but in petty charges then where the Law alloweth that which in reason is to be done that may be done without a speciall Statute for De minimis non curat Lex but in this case there is a generall charge through the Kingdome which the Law doth not permit without common consent in Parliament But it hath been alledged that this charge hath been imposed for the provision of the publick safety and defence of the Kingdome And may not this bee done when every one hath advantage by it To this I say When eminent danger and cause of defence is there must bee defence made by every man when the King shall command with his person and in such a case every man as it is said in the Presidents is bound per se sua to defend the Kingdome And I thinke no man will bee so unwise but that he will exponere se sua for the defence of the Kingdome when there is danger for otherwise hee is in danger to lose se sua But to lay a charge in generall upon a Kingdome either for making or preparing of ships or money in lieu thereof is not to bee done but by Parliament when the charge is to be borne in generall of all the Subjects To prove further that no man may have his goods taken from him but by his consent appeareth by a Record in Mich. 14. Edw. 2. Rot. 60. in the Kings Bench in a Writ of errour brought upon a Judgement given in Durham where in an action of trespasse by William Heyborne against William Keylow for entring his house and breaking his Chest and taking away 70. pounds in money the Defendant pleading not guilty the Jury found a speciall verdict That the Scots having entred the Bishoprick with an Army into Durham and making great burning and spoiles the Comminalty of Durham met together at Durham whereof the Plaintiffe was one and agreed to send some to compound with them for mony to depart and were all sworn to performe what composition should bee made and to performe what ordinance they should make in that behalfe And thereupon they compounded with the Scots for 1600. Markes But because that was to bee paid immediately they all consented that William K●ylow the Defendant and others should goe into every mans house to search what ready money was there and to take it for the making of that summe and that it should bee repaid by the Comminalty of Durham And thereupon the Defendant did enter into the Plaintiffes house and did breake open the Chest and tooke the 70. pounds which was paid accordingly towards that fine The Jury were demanded whether the Plaintiffe was present and did consent to the taking of the money they said No Whereupon the Plaintiffe had judgement to recover the said 70. pounds dammages for that otherwise hee had no remedy for his money so taken and the Defendant committed in execution for the same And thereupon the Defendant Keylow brought a Writ of errour in the Kings Bench and assigned his errours in point of judgement and there the judgement was reversed Because the Plaintiffe Heyborne had his sufficient remedy against the Comminalty of Durham for his money Because hee himselfe had agreed to this ordinance and was sworn to performe it and that the Defendant did nothing but that hee assented unto by his oath and therefore is accompted to do nothing but by his consent and as a servant unto him therefore hee was no trespasser And therefore the judgement given in Durham was reversed because hee had assented to that ordinance though hee was afterwards unwilling yet having once consented his goods were lawfully taken By which it appeareth that if hee had not particularly consented such an ordinance could not have been good to bind him although this was in a case of great danger and for defence 2. R. 2. pars 12. the Parliament Roll proved this directly although it be no Act of Parliament yet the Record is much to be regarded for it sheweth what the Law was then conceived to be For Scroope the Lord Chancellour then shewed to all the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament that all the Lords and Sages had met together since the last Parliament and having considered of the great danger the Kingdome was in and how money might be raised in a case of eminent danger which could not stay the delay of a Parliament and the Kings Coffers had not sufficient therein the Record is That they all agreed that money sufficient could not bee had without laying a charge upon the Comminalty which say they cannot bee done without a Parliament And the Lords themselves for the time did supply the said necessity with mony they lent which Record proved directly that this charge without an Act of Parliament is illegall So upon this reason I conclude That this Writ compulsarily to charge the Subjects against their wills is not warranted by any Bookes and therefore illegall If this Writ should bee allowed great inconveniences would ensue which the Law alwaies will avoid and not permit any inconveniences That if such a charge may be laid upon the Counties by Writ without assent of Parliament then no man knoweth what his charge may bee for they may bee charged as often as the King pleaseth and with making as many ships and of what burthen and with what charge of munition victualls and men as shall be set downe Wherein I doubt not but if the Law were so the King being a very pious and just King would use his power very moderately but Judges in their judgements are not to looke to present times but to all future times what may follow upon their judgements That this inconvenience may bee it appeares by the Dane-geld first appointed in time of necessity to redeeme them from the cruelty of the Danes which often changed and still increased for in Anno Dom. 991. when it began it was 10000. pounds Anno Domini 994. it was increased to 16000. pounds and Anno