AN EXACT BOOK OF ENTRIES Of the most Select JUDICIALL VVRITS USED IN THE COMMON-LAW Translated from the Originall Manuscript which was Collected by the Hands of that Eminent CLERK ROBERT MOYLE Esq Late one of the Prothonotaries of the Court of COMMON-BENCH A Work of much Industry as may appeare by the Authors great Paines in quoting of Book-Cases Opinions of Judges number Rolls and many other Requisites for the confirmation of every Entry whereof none have been ever published before Printed now for the use and benefit of all but aimed most especially for such as are most conversant in the Common-Law By J. H. Gent. With a perfect Table in which may be found the Principall matters therein contained LONDON Printed for Robert Crofts at the Crown in Chancery-Lane under Sergeants-Inne 1658. To the READER Courteous Reader KNOVVLEDGE is a thing desirable for it self because it doth enrich the mind of man but then it calls for the most esteem when 't is lodged with such as do employ it for Publick advantage It hath been the happiness of the Studients of the Law in this later Age to receive such aides from the ingenious Communication of those who went before them That the ancient Dust is not onely now wiped off from those old Records and Presidents which lay secured in Scriniis sacris but the Rolls themselves transmitted by Copy into every mans Study and an access hereby provided to them easie and familiar This present Work is a great example both of the diligence and industry of the Author in collecting the severall select formes of Entries of Judiciall Writs used in the Common-Law Though the Work be Posthumous yet it is so just a Translation of the Originall Manuscript that if the Worthy Prothonotary were now surviving he would not be ashamed to own it wherefore thou hast no reason to be ashamed to use it Farewell J. H. AN EXACT Booke of the most select Judiciall WRITS Used in the Common LAW Abatement HILL 39. Eliz. Rot. 506. ss Abatement pleaded to a Sci. fac in debt against an Admistrator for that there were two Administrators who administred and but one of them is named in the Sci. fac A Scire facias in Debt against an Administrator upon a judgement against the Intestate the Administrator appeareth and hereupon the same W. the Administrator sayth that the sayd S. ought not to have execution against him for the debt and damages aforesayd of the goods and chattells aforesayd because he sayth that the sayd Intestate at E. in the County of N. within the Arch-Deanry of N. dyed intestate after whose death and before the day of purchasing of the sayd Writ of Scire facias to wit 5. February Anno c. at L. in the County of N. the Administration of the goods and chattells which were of the sayd E. at the time of his death c. by C.L. Doctor of Lawes c. was committed to one M. Relict of the sayd T. and to the sayd W. Which sayd M. and W. adminâ—stred all the goods and chattells which were of the sayd T. at the time of his death as Administrators of those goods and chattells by virtue of the Administration aforesayd to wit at G. which sayd M. is yet surviving and in full life to wit at G. aforesayd And this he is ready to verifie whereupon for that the same M. is not named in the sayd Writ of Scire facias the same W. prayeth Judgement of that Writ c. Admission Admission to a fine after commitment to the Fleet upon a Cepi corpus returned upon a Capias pro fine for the King tam pro fine as for the execution at the suit of the party Satisfaction given to the party Admitted for six shillings eight pence paid into the hands of one of the Prothonotaries Audia elongat returned in a retorn habend the defendant appears and pleads non cul and afterwards the plaintiff prayes to be admitted to his fine and gives security and the Justices assâ—sse the fine T 12. H. 8. Rot. 159 Afterwards to wit the fourth day of July Anno c. came here into the Court the Defendant in his own person by the Sheriffs of London by virtue of a Writ of the sayd Lord the King De capias pro fine of the sayd Lord the King taken and by occasion as well of the sayd Fine as by occasion of the execution of the Judgement aforesayd at the prayer of the Plaintiff was committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet sayth that hee is ready here in Court to satisfie the Plaintiff of his damages aforesayd and brought the mony here into the Court which sayd mony the sayd Plaintiff here in Court doth receive of the same Defendant Therefore the sayd Defendant be quiet for the sayd Damages and hereupon the same Defendant prayeth to be admitted to a Fine with the Lord the King to be made by occasion of the premisses and he is admitted c. for six shillings and eight pence which the sayd Defendant in the Court of the King here by the command of the Justices here payd to John Jenour one of the Prothoâ—otaries of the Court here for divers reparations to be made here in Court and the sayd Defendant go thereof without day c. P 4. H. 8. Rot. 159. ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas T. I. in the Court of the King here had been summoned to answer T.R. of a plea wherefore he had taken the Cattell of the same R. C. and had unjustly detained them against Sureties and Pledges the same T. R. in the same Court of the King here had made default for which it was considered in the sayd Court of the King here that the sayd T. I. should go therefore without day c. And that the sayd T.R. and his Pledges to prosecute should be in mercy and that the sayd T. I. should have returne of the Cattell aforesayd and the King commanded the sayd Sheriff that without delay he returne to the sayd T. I. the cattell aforesayd and should not redeliver them at the complaint of the sayd T.R. without the Writ of the sayd Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the Judgment aforesayd And in as much c. he should make knowne here at this day to wit 15. Pas And now here at this day commeth the sayd T.R. in his proper person and the Sheriff now returneth that the cattell whereof mention is made in the sayd Writ are eloyned to places to him unknown by the sayd T. R. so that he could not have view of them and therefore hee could not make returne of the sayd Cattell to the sayd T.I. as to him it was commanded whereupon the sayd T.R. as to the eloynment of the Cattell aforesayd saith that he is in no wise thereof guilty As to the contempt not guilty And of this he putteth himself upon the Country c. But that costs labour and expences
entred as followeth Afterwards to wit ter die came here into the Court the said W. by the Keeper of the Prison aforesaid to the Bar here brought and saith that he ought not longer to be kept in the prison aforesaid for that the same W. at his owne request and not at the request of the said Plaintiff was committed to the Prison aforesaid and for that cause prayeth that he may be dismissed at large from the prison aforsaid by the Court here The Defendant is discharged out of Prison for that the Plainâ—iff prayed him not in execution And because the Justices here by due examination in this behalfe made and that it sufficiently appeareth by the Record that the allegation of the said W. is true therefore the said W. by the Court here is dismissed from the prison aforesaid And the said Keeper of the Prison aforesaid by the said court here is discharged from the custody of the said W. c. M 15. Jac. Rot. 2167. e Walter between Willby and Davenant in a Scire Facias against C. and B. Manucaptors in a Recognizance of 740 l. that the said Davenant should appeare to an account of 330 l. at the Suit of the Plaintiff Nota bien and alleageth that the Defendant appeared to an Originall of 330 l. and that afterwards in Mich. 4. Jac. R. nunc the said Davenant was condemned in the said 330 l. and in 80 s. for damages and afterwards that the Plaintiff remitted 25 l. 6 s. 4 d pro ut c. the said Davenant hath not rendred his body in execution for the judgment aforesaid for 208 l 13 s. 9 d. residue of the debt and Damages aforesaid in the same Court neither hath satisfied to the plaintiff for the residue of the debt and Damages aforesaid the Defendant Pleads that the Plaintiff ought not to have execution c. because he saith that after the Judgment aforesaid given to wit the 23 day of January An. 14. abovesaid came here into the Court the same Davenant in his proper person and then and there rendred his body to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet in execution for the said 208 l 13 s. 4 d residue of the debt and damages aforesaid against the said Davenant in Form aforesaid Recorded and in discharge of the said severall Recognizances by the severall Manucaptors acknowledged And that the said Plaintiffe then and there altogether refused to receive or Charge the said Davenant in Execution for the said 208 l. 13 s. 4 d. And this they are ready to verify c. the Plaintiffe protesting saith that he never refused c. And for that he did not render his body pro ut c. issue per Pais And it was moved by Serjeant A. that the same ought to be tried by the record and not by the county See Easter 6. H. 8. Rot. 432. And in this case divers presedents were shewed as well of Ancient as of moderne times M. Easter 12 H. 8 Rot. 324. and Easter 29. Eliz. Rot. 651. T. 12 H. 8. Rot 331. Easter 6. Ja. Rot. 105. such rendring their bodis in execution in discharge of their Manucaptors but note that there is no tender but to discharg the bail See M. 27. ort 37. Eli. Rot. c. Trin. 16. Ia. Rot. 786. tender of the body in execution to discharge the baile P 14. Ia. Rot 2175. W. against B. who tendred himselfe in execution in discharge of his sureties the Plaintiff praies him in execution and the Court will advise themselves of such commitment for that a writ of Error was brought and the Record with the Recognizance certifyed away but at length he was committed in execution notwithstanding the writ of Error in discharge of his Sureties H 9. H. 5. Rot. 461. Henster Bristoll ss Extent upon a Statute-merchant by an Executor It was commanded the sheriff that he should take the body of W. C. late Burgesse and merchant of the Town of Bristoll if c. And in the prison of the Lord the King safe c. untill he shall have fully satisfied unto R. Scot and William Scot executors of the testament of Iohn B. late Burgesse of the Town of Bristoll of 120 l. which the said W. Coombe the third day of Aprill An. R. Rich post conques se 5. before W. C. then Mayor of the City of B. and I W. then Clerke deputed to take Recognizances of debts at B. acknowledged himself to owe to the said I. B. And which they ought to have paid him at the Feast of the apostles Philip and Jacob then next and the same to him as yet c. and in asmuch c. he should make knowne to the Justices here at this day to wit in Oct. Pur beat Mariae c. And now came the said Thomas Stanford on the behalfe of the said executors And the said W. Combe came not and the sheriff retorneth that he is dead and hereupon the said Thomas Stanford prayeth a Writ thereof by the statute c. and because the Justices here are not yet advised whether they ought to grant that Writ at the petition of the said Thomas in this case or not 2 R. 3 f 8 Pl. 16. P. 2 Eliz. Dyer f. 180. Pl. 49 H. 18 E. f. 10. Pl. 35. against this Sci faâ— day therein is given to the said Executors by the said Thomas here untill 15. Pas At which day here the said Thomas Stanford and T. B and I B. who answer for the said Executors as their attornies by writ of the Lord the closed directed to the Justices here to them delivered and pray a writ by the statute And because the Justices here are not yet advised whether that writ ought to be granted at the petition of the said attornies Dyer f. 180. 49. e conâ—r quaere in this case or not day is given therein to the said Executors by their attornies here untill in Octo. S. Trin. At which day here came the same Executors by the said Thomas Stanford their attorney and they bring here into Court the statute aforesaid and also the letters Testamentary of the said Io. Barstable by which it sufficiently appeareth to the Court here the said Robert and William to be the Executors of the Testament of the said I. B. and thereof to have the administrations c. and pray thereof a writ by the statute c. and to them it is granted retorneable here A die S. Mich. in un Mensem c. and in asmuch c. the sheriff should make known here at the same Term c. before which day the Plaintiffe aforesaid remaineth without day for that the Lord Hen. late King of England the 5 after the conquest dyed afterwards to wit in the Term of S. Hil. An. 1. Hen. 6. now King of England after the conquest namely the same W. Scot executor by the same Thomas Sanford his attorny and for that the same W. S.
Court with his owne hands the writ aforesaid directed to the said Mayor Aldermen sheriffs in Forme aforesaid The writ delivered in Cou t. The party comes in his proper person Returne de causes And before the said chief Justice by the same Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs the 10th day of Jan. last past retorned and executed and the same cheif Justice hath certified here in court that then and there before the said Châ—ife Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the said P. in his proper person under the custody of the said sheriffs and Martin L. and P. P. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid now retorne that before the coming of the said writ the 15th day of Dec. An. R. c. 12. The same Peter was taken in the City aforesaid and detained in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of the said Sheriffs by vertue of a complaint levied against him the same day and year in the Court of the Lord the King held before the same M. L. by the name of Peter Furbusher Gent. at the suit of H. R. in a plea of Trespasse 1 Cause in a plea of Trespass Damages 40 l. to the Damages of forty pounds the said Peter was also detained by vertue of a complaint against him 20 Ja. praed levaet in the Court of the sayd Lord the King held before the said Martin Limny by the name of P. F. at the suit of Alexander Ratcliffe in a plea of Debt upon demand of sixty pounds 2 Cause in debt for 60 l. and so recite all the causes whereof the partyes aforesayd have pleaded and so depend undetermined and that these were the causes of taking and detaining of the sayd Peter in the prison aforesaid whose body they have ready as by the sayd Writ to them it is commanded c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the said cheife Justice then and there fully examined and understood The party and She iffs are discharged it seemed to the said cheif Justice that the sayd P. ought then and there to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid whereupon the same Peter was then and there dismissed from the custody of the said Sheriffs by the said cheif Justice Vpona forraign Attachment accordingly 1 H 15 Elâ—â—t 588 and the same Sheriffs then and there were discharged by the same cheif Justice from his custody and hereupon the same P. and R. H. of Stepney c. and I.B. of the same Dyer undertook and every of them did undertake Mâ—ch 8 and 9 El. rot 329. Entry of a priviledge for diverse causes and the bail entred severally and there rot 1754. Recognizance to appear to Writs or Actions to be brought Note that in this case the Originall ought to be brought the next Terme ensuing but in a reversall the plaintiff hath liberty of two Termes to bring his Writ to wit the same P. in the summe of one hundred and twenty pounds and the same R. and I. severally in the summe of sixty pounds at the suit of Alexander Ratcliff and Sic de ceteris c. That the said P. should appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law and answer to the severall Actions or Writs of the same H.R. c. against the same P. of and upon the severall pleas aforesaid before 15 Pasch then next coming to be brought and prosecuted here in Court and also if it shall happen judgment after the apperance of the sayd P. here in Court made in the same pleas for the same H. and A. and against the said P to be given to satisfie the same H. c. of their Damages and the sayd Alexander of his Debt and Damages for the same H. c. and A. against the same Peter in the same Court here to be recovered or adjudged in the pleas aforesaid or that the same P. render himself to the prison of the Fleete of the Lord the King for those occasions which sayd severall summs by the said Manucaptors in forme aforesaid acknowledged the same Manucaptors acknowledge to be made of their Lands and Chattells and which sayd severall summs by the same P in form aforesaid acknowledged the sayd Peter acknowledgeth to be made of his Lands and Chattells and to be levied to the use and behoof of the sayd H. and A. in form aforesaid if it happen the same P. make Default in any of the premisses and in lawfull manner to be convinced thereof Brownlow T 41 Eliz. rot 1229. ss That the said R shall appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law to the Action or Writ of the said A against the said R. of and upon the cause aforesaid before such a day to be brought and prosecuted in Court here and to answer to the said A. in the plea aforesaid and also if it happen c. Entry of a priviledge returnable immediat in banck H 12 Jac. rot 2262. Brownlow As before in the president for P.F. untill or one of them should have before the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of the said Writ that the same Justices of the said Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid c. untill the end of the Writ Afterwards to wit the ninth of February that same Terme came here into Court the same Michael in his own person under the custody of the Bailiff of the Marshall and Judges c. And recite the Return of the Writ whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said Justices here that the sayd M at present ought to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid and so as in the president before Alit T 14 Eliz. rot 1288. Divers causes returned wherein are diverse Complaints in Trespasse and debt and the Entry is that he shall appear in Court in his proper person or his sufficient Attorney in Law of and upon the severall Actions of and for the summs aforesaid against the same W. by the said T. M. and M. or any of them before 8 Michaelis next coming to be brought or prosecuted here in Court severally to the same T. M. and M. or either of them in the said Court here in the severall pleas aforesaid P. 28 Eliz. rot 328. the like against the said W. severally to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same W. render himselfe upon that occasion or occasions to the prison of the Fleet of the Lord the said King which sayd summ of fifty pounds to wit twenty pounds thereof the same T. ten pounds to the said M and O. to the sayd I. I. acknowledged every of them acknowledgeth severally to be made of their Lands and Chattells and to the use c. Speciall Amerciament of the Sheriff for not returning of a Writ of Habeas corpus in debt after
came to the hands and possession of the said P. after the death of the said W. and this c. Judgement if Execution c. AND the said R. saith Peplication that he had more assets at tue Teste of the Writ c. to the value of the debt c. and issue thereupon That hee by any thing before alledged from having his Execution aforesaid of the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith that the said P. the day of the obtaining of the writ of Scire facias aforesaid to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the same W at the time of his death to be administred to the value of the Debt and Damages aforesaid above recovered besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the said W. whereof the same P. might have satisfied the said R. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid to wit at S. in the County aforesaid and this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country and the same Defendant c. Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he cause to come c. THe Jury say upon their oath Verdict that he had assets to 30 l. at the Teste c. overâ— c. and no more c. as to thirty pounds of the within written two hundred and six pounds parcell that the said P. the day of purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the within named W at the time of his death and in his hands to be administred to the value of the said thirty pounds besides the goods and chattells to the value of the said Forty shillings which came to the hands of the same P. after the death of the same W to be administred whereof the same P might have satisfied the said R. of the said thirty pounds Verdect for the Defendant to wit at S aforesaid as the same R hath thereof within alledged and as to the seventy foure pounds of the within named two hundred and six pounds residue the same Iury say upon their oath That the same P. the day of purchasing of the Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had no Lands or Chattells which were of the within named W. at the time of his death in his hands to be administred to the value of the said one hundred seventy four pounds beside the goods and chattells to the value of the said forty shillings Judgement which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the same W. whereof the same P. could satisfie the same R. of the said one hundred seventy four pounds to wit at S. in the County aforesaid as the same P. thereof within alledged therefore c. search the Judgment with Mr. Brownlow Entry of a Sci fac against an executor of one Manucaptor of three Manucaptors upon a Recognizance of baile upon an arrest in debt c. P 1. Jac. rot 817. Middlesex ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas by I R of B c. H D of C. c. and T. M. of C. c. of late to wit the twentieth day of Aprill Anno 41 Eliz. before E. A. Knight cheife Justice of the Court of Common Bench of the said Lady the Queen here at his dwelling house in the Charterhouse neer London undertook and every of them did undertake for M. T. late of London c. otherwise called c. in the County of Somerset Gent. in one hundred and fifty pounds And the same Morgan then and there assumed for himselfe in three hundred pounds and if it should happen the same M in a certain plea of Debt upon Demand of one hundred and fifty pounds against the same M by one Elias I in the said Court of the Lady the Queene of the Common Bench Recitall of the recognizance here prosecuted in any lawfull manner to be convinced and Judgement for the same E in the plea aforesaid against the said W. in the said Court to be given that then the same M. the said Debt of one hundred and fifty pounds and also all Damages to the said E by occasion of the detaining of the said Debt in the same Court of the late King against the same M in any manner to be assessed or adjudged would satisfie and render which said one hundred and fifty pounds the same I H and T M severally acknowledge to be made upon their Lands and Chattells And which sayd three hundred pounds the said M acknowledgeth to be likewise made of his Lands and Chattells and to Be levied for the use of the said E if it should happen the same M contrary to the Manucaption aforesaid in any manner to make Default And although the same E afterwards Judgement against the principall Hil. 42 Eliz to wit in the Terme of Saint Hillary Anno 42 Eliz. before E. Anderson Knight and his Associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by consideration of the same had recovered against the same M. as well the same one hundred and fifty pounds at the same forty shillings which to the same E in the same Court of the Queen here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that Debt whereof hee is convicted as by the record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the said late Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same M. hitherto hath not satisfied the same E. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid Breach of the Recognizance nor in the same Court here hath rendred his body in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesayd according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid and the said T M is dead as by the information of the same E the King is given to understand And because c. that by honest c. he make known to A M Widdow An Alias Sci. fac was awared and continuances divers imparlances ought to be here The Defendant pleads assets to the value of 36 l. 5 s. came to her hands after the death c. and pleads a judgment against the Testator in his life time in London upon concessit solvere and that she had imployeâ— part of the assets about the funerall part about the the probaâ—e of the will part to compound the judgment and the residue brings here into Court ready to pay c. with plea that she hath no more c. The plaint leviviâ—d The plaintiffs finde pledges to prosecute and make their Attorney Executrix of the testament of the same T. M. of being here at this day to wit in Cro Asc Dom to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T in forme aforesaid acknowledged of
plea aforesaid and they being solmnly called came not and the sheriff of Cornwell to wit C. T. Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed such a day and yeare Tertenant returned of a Messuage and thirty acres of land by W. N. and H. F. honest c. made known to R. D. Tenant of one messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances in T. C. now or late in the tenure of I. C and L M which were of I C in Fee simple at the time of the judgment given and afterwards that he should be here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid c. Therefore it is considered that the said Hugh have his execution against the said R. D. Tenant of the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied Judgment of the said Massuage and 30 acres of Land with the appurtenances Execution by default for the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied of the lands and tenements aforesaid Elegit of the moyety awarded of the lands for default of the said R. and hereupon the said H chose to be delivered to him the moyety of the said messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances according to the Form of the Statute thereof made and provided until the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levyed and prayeth a writ of the said Lady the Queen thereof to be directed to the said sheriff of the County of Cornwall and it is granted him retornable here tres Trin. And in as much c. Brownlow H 43. Eliz Rot. 157. Suff. ff Scire fac For Seaman against the Ter-tenants of T. L Re. in Cr. Trini 41. Eliz. upon a Recognizance for 60 l. 33 s. 4 d. for damages For P L retorned ter-tenant of divers lands c. saith that the said T L before the said judgment 10. of August 35. Eliz enfeoffed I. and T Brown to the use of the said Tho. and his heires males and that he was seised in Spec. Fee-tayle at the time of the judgment given and that he 11. Sept 41 dyed seised in taile And that the Lands descended to the said P as Son and heir and that he entred and was seised in Spec. Taile judgment if execution c the Plaintiff saith that T was seised in fee simple Entry of a Sci fac upon a bail to make deliverance after gage deliverance of Cattell in Court against the Manucaptors because the Conusor had not made deliverance 1 H 7 11. 21 E 3. Bâ— Pledges 9. 18. at the time of the judgment given and traverseth the Feoffment modo et forma HAs 33. Eliz. Rot. 2045. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas G. G. of c R S. of c. in the Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit in the Term of St. Hillary An. c. 82 Before E.A. Knight c. of the bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid had undertaken and both of them did undertake for S G that the same S should make deliverance return of 6. Cows to E C before the Feast of the Appostle P. I then next following under the penalty of both of them 40 l. which said 40 l. the same G S acknowledged and each of them acknowledgeth to be made of their Lands and Chattles and to belevied to the use of the said T. E. if the said S. G should not make deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the same T. according to the Form and effect of the recognizance aforesaid And the same S heitherto hath not made deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the said E. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T. the Queen understandeth And because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said G. and S. that they should be here at this day to wit tali di to shew if any thing c. to wit the said G. wherefore he the said 40 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles And the same S. wherefore the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his Lands and chattles and either of them ought not to be made and rendred to the same T. according to the form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. At which day here came aswell the same T. by F. E. his attorny as the same G. and S. in their proper persons and hereupon the same T. prayeth execution against the same G. of the said 40 l. by him in Forme aforsaid acknowledged c. and against the said S. for the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged Test Nichil dic to be adjudged by him c. And the said G. and S. reserving to themselvs all and all manner c. Pet. tit entry of a Nihil dic hereupon Mich 34. Eli. Rot. 1813. Entry of a Sci fac upon a recognizance taken to make deliverance upon a gage deliverance against Manucapt because the Conusor had not made deliverance ss HIll 18. Eliz. Rot. 405. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. N. late c. and G. H. of c. lately in the Court of the Queen here to wit in Trinity term An. 17. c. before I. D. Knight and his associates Justices of the Lady the Queen here of the common Bench and undertook for W. C. that the said W. should make deliverance and retorn of ten Oxon or of the value of them to T. H. upon the tenth day of June then next following within the Church yard of the parish Church of S. in the county of S. under the penalty of 200 l. which said 200 l. the said H. and G. acknowledged to be made of their lands and Chattles and to be Levied to the use of the same T. and D. the said W. made not deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid nor of the value of them according to the Form of the racognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T and D the Qu. understandeth T 9 Jac rot 3 510. and because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said H. and G. that they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Hill to shew if c. wherefore the same T. and D. ought not to have execution against them of the said 200 l. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid Sci. fac in a writ De droit de gard Sci facâ— upon judgment in debt and detinue if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said T. D by their attornies aforesaid as the same H and G. by F. their attorney And the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c And hereupon the said T. and D. pray execution against the same H. and G. of the said 200 l. to be adjudged them c. H 10. H. 6. Rot. 141. Scire Fac Upon a
with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid to the said Edward should be delivered and c. And hereupon the sheriff is commanded that he remove the same Hum. from the possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid without delay he should cause to be delivered And in asmuch c. the sheriff make to appeare here 15. Hill at which day here came the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff of the said County of Stafford to wit R. M. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed the 20 day of January An. c. 10. came to the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances And the same Humphery P from the possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances removed And the moyety of the same mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to wit one Close called the Mills of the yearly in all issues besides reprises 8 l. and so recite such premisses as are expressed in the Writ by the first Inquisition unto beyond reprizes 4 l. being the equall and just moyety of the whole Mannor and of all the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the same Edward B. made to be delivered according to the extent aforesaid in the Inquisition aforesaid above made as by the said Writ it was commanded to him c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Conusee in a statute merch brought by the conusor to have back the possession of lands extended for that he is satisfied M. 47. E. 3. fo 11 Pl. 9. fit Sci. fac 96. T. 17. E. 3. fo 43. Pl. 38. T 19 Jac. rot 2159. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should take the body of Thomas Leake of L. in the County of Nottingham Gent. if he were a Lay-man and in the prison of the Lord the King under their custody should safely keep untill unto G. Woodnot of S in the same County Gent. of four hundred pounds which the same Thomas the thirtieth day of October Anno Regni c. 4. before I. R. then Mayor of the City of Lincolne and Leonard Carr Clark deputed to take the Recognizance of Debts within the City acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said George and which to him at the Feast c. then next following he ought to have paid and the same to him hitherto he hath not payd as it is said and insomuch as shall be executed of that precept of the Lord the King they should make knowne to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster in Cr. S Trinitatis An. Rs. c. 18 And the same sheriff to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day retorned H. 17. Jac. rot 293 â— L. a. R. and F. the like Scire fac upon a promise that the conusee is satisfied pro fluxum temporis That the said Thomas was not found in their bayliwick Therefore it was commanded to the sheriff of B. that all the goods and Chattles of the same Thomas and all his Lands and Tenements whereof the same Thomas at the day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid or at any time afterwards was seised unto those hands soever they have came unlesse they descend to some heir being within age by hereditary descent you cause to be delivered to the said George by resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattels And to hold the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the Forme of the statute thereof provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with reasonable Damages costs charges as in labours suits delayes and expences he had therein levied T 39 Eliz rot 1711. the Defendant after judgment and before execution makes a Feoffment in fee to I S who enfensss J N and then the lands are extended the second Feoffee bring the moneys into the Court and prayeth restitution the Plaintiff warned comes and receives the money and restitution was awarded and in asmuch as the said sheriff had executed the said precept of the said Lord the King he should make appeare to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westm from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks An. R. c. 18. At which day Humphery Foster Baronet sheriff of the County of Berke then returned to the justices of the Lord the said King at Westm a certaine Inquisition before him at Winsor in the County aforesaid the first day of Iuly then last past taken by which it was then found that the said Thomas after the Recognizance of the Debt aforesaid and at the time of taking of that Inquisition was seised in his Demesn as of Fee and right of and in the Mannor of W. otherwise E. W. and also of the Scite and Mansion house of the same mannor of W. otherwise E. W. And so recite the whole Inquisition verbatim unto the issues besides reprises of 50 l. which said mannor and Scite and of the mannor aforesaid with all their appurtenances the sheriff aforesaid the first day of July delivered by the extent aforesaid to the said George to hold to him and his assignes as his Free Tenement untill the Debt aforesaid together with the reasonable and necessary Damages costs and charges should be levyed thereof as by the same writ and returne thereof in the same Court of the Lord the King here of Record remayning manifestly appeareth And although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the said George was satisfied of his Debt Damages costs necessary and resonable charges Neverthelesse the same G. possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances yet holdeth as by the information of the said Th. the King understandeth The Lord the King willing to do in this behalfe what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriffs of London that by honest and lawfull men of their bayliwick they should make knowne to the said George W. that he should be here at Westminster in Crastino S. Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. Testat Sci Fac awarded wherefore the same George whereas to him of his Debt Damages Costs and resonable and necessary charges it hath been satisfied possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he ought or can hold At which day the sheriff returne to the Justices of the Lord the King here that the said G. hath nothing in their bayliwick whereby they could make knowne to him neither was found in the same whereas it was Testified in the same Court of of the Lord the King here that he hath sufficient in the County of Nott. whereby the same sheriff can make knowne to him whereupon it was commanded to the
and not found in his bayliwick as by the record and proceedings therein in the same court of the Lord the King before the Justices of the same Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid remayning manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon and the same I. H Gent. is dead as by the information of Robert Broundling Esq Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the same I H. at the time of his death during the minority of W. H. and R H. Executors of the Testament of the said I. H. Gent. the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. be should make knowne to the said I. H. Knight that he should be here at this day to wit 15. Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Robert ought not to have Execution against him of the debt aforesaid ought not to have c. according to the form of the acknowledgement aforesaid c. now here at this day came the same Rob. by I. Gill his attorney and offered himself the fourth day against I. H Knight in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff to wit Henry Chapman now retorneth that the said I. H. Knight hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the same R. saith that after the said 15. Pas last past the same I. H. Gent. at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne made his last will and Testament the same William H. and Ralph his Sons being then within the age of 17. yeares Executors of the same Testament made and ordayned And that the Administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said I H. Gent. at the time of his death during the minority of the same William and Ralph by Clement Colmor c. The 19. day of November in the yeare of our Lord 1613. at the Towne of New Castell upon Tyne after the death of the said I. H. Gent to the same Robert was committed And he bringeth here into Court aswell the letters Testamentary of the same I. H. Gent. by which it sufficiently appeareth to the Court here the same William and Ralph to be Executors of the Testament aforesaid And thereof to have the administration As the letters administratory of the said officiall which the Commission of the administration aforesaid in Form aforesaid do testifie whose date are the same 19 day of November An. Do. 1613. abovesaid with this that the said Robert will verifie that the same William and Ralph are yet living to wit at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne and are within the age of 17. yeares and hereupon the same Robert payeth execution against the same I. H. Knight of the Debt aforesaid by default c. and hereupon the same Robert prayeth a writ of the Lord the King by the statute c. to the Reverend Father in Christ William Bishop of Durham or keeper of his place there to be directed And it is granted him retornable here in Cr. S. Trin c. ss BRownlow ss Whereas A. M Gent. and W. H. late of Entry of a Sci fac against manucaptors c. Gent. at an other time to wit 29 day of June An. 21. before Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Cheife Justices of the common bench at his Chamber in Serjeants Inne Fleetstreet London undertook and each of them did undertake to wit the same A. in the summe of 160 l. And the same W. in the summe of 80 l. that he the same A. should appeare in our Court before our Justices at Westminster in his proper person or by his sufficient attorney in Law to an action or writ of one R. S. against the same Arthur of and upon an action of debt upon demand of 80 l. before 8. Mich. then next to come to be commenced and in our said Court before our Justices at Westminster to be prosecuted and to answer to the same Richard in the plea aforesaid And also it should happen judgment after the appearance of the said A. in the Cour here made in in the same plea for the said Richard against the same A. to be given to satisfie to the said Richard of the debt and damages for the same Richard against the same A in the same Court in the plea aforesaid to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same A upon that occasion should render himselfe to the prison of the Fleet Which said summe of 160 l. the same A acknowledgeth to be made of their lands and chattles which said 80 l. the same W. acknowledgeth to be made of his lands and Chattles to be levied to the use and behoof of the said Richard if it should happen the said A. to make default in any of the premisses and thereof lawfully to be convicted which said Recognizance in Form aforesaid taken The said Cheife Justice afterwards to wit the 30 day of June then next following in our said Court with his owne hands and delivered to be inroled upon Record and now there before our Justices of the common Bench aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid in the Terme of the holy Trinity An. 21. abovesaid is inroled of which said plea of Debt a certain plaint before them was levied in our Court before Iohn Hodges Esq then being one of the sheriffs of London and the same plaint by our Writ upon our Command before our Chief Justice at his Chamber aforesaid was sent and had As by the record and proceedings therein in our said Court before our said Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth And although the same Richard before the said Oct. S. Mich. to wit the 17. day of September An. c. 21. abovesaid our certaine originall Writ in a plea of debt of 80 l. against the same A. out of our Chancery at Westminster aforesaid then being before our Justices of the Common Bench at Westminster aforesaid Oct. S. Mich. then next following retornable Commenced and the same A. at the said 8. S. Mich. by I. R. then his Attorney to the said Writ in Debt aforesaid as by the same Richard against the same A. in Forme aforesaid commenced according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid appeared And afterwards to wit in 8. S. Hill then next following the same A. aswell of the said Debt of 80 l. aforesaid as in 7 l. which to the same Richard in our said Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by the occasion of the detayning of that Debt whereof he was convicted and judgment there against the same A. for the same Richard in the same plea in our Court aforesaid was given as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court before our Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same A. hath not rendred his body in execution of the Judgment aforesaid in our said Court at the said Oct. S. Hill nor satisfied the said Richard for the
4. Accedas ad cur to remove a plaint out of an inferiour Court and a Procedendo awarded for that the damags in the plaint are under 40 s. fo 5. Allowance A writ of allowance entred for one of the Just of the common Bench by reason of infirmities fo 7. Amertiament Amerciament entred against a sheriff for his insufficient retorn upon a writ of wast Amerciament nor returning for a Capias Utlagat ib. Amerciament for not returning of Capias ad Satis after severall daies given by the court ib. Amerciament for the marshall for non attendance upon the judge upon the essoine day ib. Amerciamet Amerciament entred against the sheriff upon an attachment of Priviledg and a Habeas Corpus awarded fo 11. Amerciament entred upon an attachment of priviledg for one of the Judges clarks of the common Bench and awarding of a Habeas Corpus ib. Amerciament entred against a baily of a liberty upon a Cepi corp returned and a Distringas awarded upon an attachment of priviledg ib. Amerciament entred against the sheriff upon returne of the Languidus in prisona upon an attachment for contempt 12. Appearance Appearance baile in court entred upon a writ of priviledg in discharge of the sheriffs bond 9 Appearance entred to a writ of priviledg in trespasse ib. Appearance made in discharge of Manucaptors upon meane Proces 10. Attachment Attachment in the Mayors court for debt the attachment disattached by baile and plaint removed by a common writ of priviledg with Cerciorare 10 Attachment entred in a Quare impedit and a distres awarded ib. Attachment awarded in the like with summons and severance 1. of the plaintiffs comes not judgment that the other sequat solus the Bishop Essoines c. ib B Ballivo Amovendo Entry of a writ of Ballivo amovendo for continuing his office above one year together contra formam statuti 13 C Capias ad satisfaciendum ENtry of a testat ca sa for residue of a debt whereof part was levied upon a testat fi fac 14 Capias pro fine entred and an Exigent thereupon ib. Entry of Ca. sa after a Fi. fac and Spec. return of Devastavit against the executrix upon the inquisition 15. Entry of a writ of Testat ca. sa in the county Palatine after a devastavit returned against the exec upon a testat si fac de bonis Testatoris 17 Entry of a Ca. sa by the executors of the Conusor after the death of the Conusee in a statute merchant 18 Entry of a Capias ad sat upon a statute merchant upon the sheriffs returne that the defendant is dead an Extent is prayed against his lands by the statute and granted in the county Palantine of Lanc. 18. Entry of a Capias upon a statute merchant and upon Laici and non inventus returned an Extent awarded 19 Continuance of an extent where the writ is awarded in one county ib. Entry of a Capias ad satisfaciendum after nulla bona returned upon an Elegit ib. Entry of Ca. sa in the proper county and non inventus retorned and a testat ca. sa awarded into a forreigne county 20. Entry of a Capias ad sat upon a writ of priviledg and Cepi corpus returned and after the sheriff returns that specially that before he toke him by vertue of an other writ c. the defendant is bayled upon the Execution and an attaint brought c. ib. Commitment Commitment specially entred for levying of a fine in the name of the person who refused to acknowledg 22. Commitment for forging of writs and counterfeiting of the seale 23 Commitment for making a faigned writ of Supersedeas 24. Commitment to the Fleet upon a Cepi corpus upon a Capias utlagat with a Remittitur into London to answer the plaint there c. ib Commitment to the Fleet of one in execution upon a judgment there ibe Commitment of one in execution upon a Scire sac upon judgment the defendant saith nothing in bar judgement that execution c. ib Commitment of one to the fleet for rasure of a Record in the common Bench ex confesso afterwards fined and set at liberty 25. Commitment by the indictment roll without any proces of execution sued forth upon a Habeas Corpus Commitment of a Prothonotaries clarke and a sheriffs clarke for rasing an execution the returne and and test and serving of the writ before it was new sealed spe examinants ib. Commitment of an attorney for altering of a counter plea of the voucher 26. Commitment to the fleet for rasure of a fine and a fine imposed ib. Commitment upon a Habeas corpus from the Judges chamber the writ bore test 4. July 18. Iac the term ended 5. July upon which day the judge delivered the commitment to be inroled 30 Commitment of one to the Fleet in vacation time brought by the sheriff of London by Habeas corpus before the Judg. 32. Commitment of a prisoner to the Fleet brought to the bar in terme by a Habeas corpus ib. Commitment for forging a Cirography to a fine 33 Commitment of an attorney for prosecuting a Capias in trespas without any originall to warrant it dismissed upon a fine Entry of orders for the right regulating of Offices in the court of common Bench. 34. Commitment of an attorney turned over the Bar for divers falsities 35 D Debt ENtry of writ ad Levand deb de bonis mobili Cleric upon a statute merchant upon returne of nulla bona mobilia and that he is benificed an extent is awarded 36. Distringas Entry of a distringas against the Lord of a Mannor in ancient demesne to hold his court that the sheriff Recordari fac Loquelam 36 Entry of a distringas against a sheriff for returning of pettit issues and a Testat distringas granted to a forreigne county to distraine the Defendant by greater issues 37 E Elegit ENtry of an Elegit upon the Roll of the entry of the Scire fac the same terme in which it was retorned and a speciall retorne of the sheriff 37 Entry of a writ of Elegit against a clerk the sheriff returns non habet Laic Feod and an Extent awarded to extend bona terra ecclesiastica but upon motion a Fi. fac was thought more proper awarded 39 Entry of an Elegit after an Elegit 40. Entry of an Elegit for the value in dower 41. Execution Entry of the tender of the body in execution in discharg of the Manucaptors 41. Entry of a tender of the body in execution after judgement against the principall in discharge of his suretyes 42. The defendant discharged out of prison for that the plaintiff prayed him not in execution ib Execution Entry of a tender in execution the Pla. prayes him in execution of the court Cur advisare vult because a writ of Error is brought and the record and recognizance are certified away but at length committed in discharge of his sureties 34. Extent Entry
was sent back from the Justices at Chester to the Bench to determine a Forreigne voucher day is given the tenants make default and for that the cause was determined 91 Entry of a Count ad Terminum qui Praet in County Palatine of Chester with the Pleadings 92 S Secunda Deliberatio Entry of a writ of Second Deliverance after the goods were taken in Withernam and the Defendants attorny was compelled to gage deliverance 93 Scire Facias Entry of a Scire Facias upon a recognizance against sureties in replevin after Averia elongat retorned 95 Entry of a Scire fac after a judgment reversed in writ of false judgment upon a Record in Dtinue 97 Entry of a Scire Fac directed both to the sheriff and Coroner to levy a debt upon a Fieri Facias and not paid at the retorne of the Fi Fac. 98 Entry of a Scire Fac. upon a generall pardon after a capias ut lagat wherein are speciall pleadings 110 Entry of a count in debt upon a generall pardon 100 Entry of a Scire Facias upon a recognizance where one of the defendants is dead and the other prayeth imparlance ib. Entry of a Scire Fac. against the Tenant by Elegit where part of the debt is levyed the residue brought And a delivery awarded 101 Entry of a Scire fac awarded in Aide 102 Scire Facias Entry of a Scire fac by an administrator against an executor where the letters of administration are shewed assets confessed to 40 l. and traverseth that he hath Nulla alia bona Replication that he hath more Assets and verdict 102 Entry of a Scire Fac. against an executor of 1 Manucaptor of 3. Manucaptors upon a Recognizance in debt judgment against the Principall Speciall pleadings 104 Entry of a speciall bar to a Scire fac against the executor to have execution de bonis propriis after a Devastavit retorned wherin judgment is for the Defendant after demurrer 109 After plene administravit pleaâ—ded assets are found and judgmen-thereupon the sheriff retornes a Deo vastavit such Spe. Devastavit â—n 1 good plea. 11â— Entry of Scire fac against an executor upon surmise that the executor had wasted the goods of the Testator after judgment tryall and speciall verdict therein ib. Entry of a Bar to an alias Scire facias upon Recognizance in priviledg where one makes default and the other pleads payment issue non solvit ib. Entry of a Scire fac against Ter-tenants upon judgment in debt after death of the obligee the recovery recited Elegit awarded de medietate terrarum 112 Entry of a Scire fac upon a Recognizance the defendant pleads a feoffement made of the lands c. before judgment c. and prayeth Iudgment The plaintiff saith that the Lands are held in Fee simple and Traverseth the feoffment 113 Entry of a Scire fac upon baile to make deliverance after gage deliverance of Cattle in Court against Manucaptors because the Conusee had not made deliverance Iudgment by nichil dicit ib. Entry of the like Scire fac against Manucaptors c. 114 Entry of a Scire fac upon a Iudgment in a Writ de Droit de Gard. Entry of a Scire fac upon Iudgment in detinue for Cattle ib. Entry of a Scire fac against an heire upon Iudgment against his father in Debt and an Elegit awarded 115 Entry of a Scire fac against an heire upon Iudgment against his father in the time of another King ibi Entry of a Scire fac against the Ter-tenants of lands descended to G. in Feesimple from W. his father and which were of the said G. 12. F. test of the originall 116 Entry of a Scire fac at the suite of an executor against an heire upon a Iudgment against the father viens per Discent pleaded in bar replication Assets per discent at the test of the Scire fac 111 Entry of a continuance of a Scire fac 118 Entry of a Scire Fac. by the surviving Administrator of the goods of the first intestat not administred by the first Administrator ib. Entry of a Scire fac to have execution de bonis propriis upon a devastavit retorned post Annum diem ib. Entry of a Scire fac brought by the executor against the administrator at the full age of the executrix upon a Iudgment had against the intestat by the administrator during the Minority of the Infant ib. Entry of a Scire fac against ter-tenants 119 Entry of an alias Scire fac against the Administrator upon Iudgment against the intestat 120 Entry of a Scire fac with a Capias testat thereupon awarded ib. Entry of an Alias Scire fac upon Iudgment had against the Principall upon originall in debt out of the common Bench. ib. Entry of an alias Scire fac where the first terme 122 Entry of a Scire fac upon a recovery in Dower against the ter-tenants for the value of the Damages ibi Entry of a Scire fac upon Iudgement had against 4. executors whereof 2. onely appeared and those only amersed 124 Entry of a Scire fac by a new Administrator during the minority c. of goods not administred by the first administrator upon a recovery by the first administrator Iudgment by nihil dic 125 Entry of a Scire fac to have the penalty given by the statute of 23. H. 6. cap. 11. against a sheriff for levying more monies upon a town for Knight service then the towne was taxed 126 Entry of a writ of Attachment issued out of Parliament to heare a bill to the same Parliament 127 Entry of a plea of speciall Bastardy pleaded in Bar to a Scire fac to have execution upon a fine demurrer thereto and judgment for the demandant ib. Entry of a Scire fac wherein execution was awarded at the Assize upon the tryall before the day in the Bench. 148 Entry of a Scire fac wherein aide is granted by the King to execute a fine ib. Entry of a Scire fac brought by the K. upon a judgment in Assize of Darreigne presentment had by the King by reason of the wardship of an Ideote Defendant pleads that the Lessor was respited untill 8. Hill for the default of the recognitors and judgment therein against the King ib. Entry of a Scire fac brought by the Tenant in Recovery to have execution of lands in value against the voucher 130 Entry of a Scire fac wherein judgment is given against the Pla. in execution of a fine ib. Entry of a Scire fa upon an indictment in debt where the defendant before execution fradulently convayed his lands with intent to defeat the plaintiff ib. Entry of a Scire fac for damages in an Assize of fresh force 131 Entry of a Scire fac against the sheriff for taking insufficient pledges in Repleg Entry of a Scire fac and judgment herein superseaded for that the def was in the Kings custody ib.
upon statute Merchant and upon return nulla bona mobilia And that he is beneficed at D. and awarding of an Extent c. See the Register of Writs fol. 148. An action 147. C. B. F. N B. fol. 131. A. M. 39. H. 6. rot 134. fi fa. de bonis eccliastices H 45. Eliz. Rot. Rot. 1211. Brownlow C. Ebor. ss The Sheriffs were commanded that 400 l. of the movable goods and Chattles of Richard Baitson of B. in the county of York Clerk in the Bailywick without delay they levy and cause to be had to Eliz. M. of the City of York merchant which the same Richard the 9th July Ao. R. nunc 44. before T. M. Mayor of the City of York and Thomas Royston then clerk deputed to take Recognizance of debts according to the form of the statute merchant within the same city acknowledged himselfe to owe to the same E. which he ought to have paid to him at the Feast of St. Michael then next coming and the same to him hath not yet paid c. And in as much c. They should make known here at this day to wit in October Pur. S. Mariae c. And now here at the day came the same Eliz. by James Bryâ— his attorny here into the court the Recognizance aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in Form aforesaid testifieth And the Sheriff now retorneth that the same Richard hath no movable goods or chattles in their Bailywick wherof they could levy the debt aforesaid or any parcel thereof And that the same Rich. is a clerk and benificed within the Dioces of York to wit at B. aforesaid And that he hath no lay Fee within their Bailywick and hereupon the same Eliz. praveth a writ of the Lady the Queen by the statute c. to the Reverent Father in Christ to Mathew Arch-Bishop of York Primate and Metropolitan of England to be directed and it is granted to him c. And in asmuch c. the same Archb. should make knowne here 15. Trin. the same day is given to the same Eliz. here c. Distringas Distress against the Lord of a mannor in aneient demesnes to hold his court c. Mich. 1. Mariae Rot. 123. entry of a writ of distresse against the Lord of a Mannor of ancient demesnes to hold his court so that the Sheriff recordari fac Loq in a writ of false iudgment upon a writ de recto clause T 3. Ca. Rot. 1887. Pytt Philizer London ss Entrey of a distringas against the Sheriff for returning of Pettit issues the plaintiff prayeth a Test Distringas to a forreigne county that the defendant may be distrained by greater issues omnia issues 10 l. It was commanded the Sheriffs as more times the King had commanded the same Sheriffs that they should destrain the Mayor Cominalty citizens of the city of London otherwise called M C. and C. of the city of London by all their lands c. and that of the issues c. And that they should have their bodys here at this day to witt in Cr. Trin. to answer D. B. widow R. B. Esquire and T. B. gent. executors of the testament of Tho. Bennet otherwise called T. B. the younger citizen and Alderman of London of a plea that they render unto to them 1500 l. which from them they uniustly detaine c. And now here at this day come the same D.R. and T. Bennet by Richard Williams their attorney and offered themselves the 4. day against the said Mayor and Cominalty citizens of the city of London in the plea aforesaid and they came not the sheriffs to wit R. F. and E. Brumfeyld now retorn that the same M. and C. and citizens of London are distrained by their chattles to the value of 40 l. and bayled by I. G. and R. R. Therefore they in mercy and because it is testified in the same court of the Lord the King here on the behalfe of the same executors that the said Mayor and C. and. citizens of London have divers lands and chattles in the county of Surrey Testat distringas awarded to the Sheriff of Surry whereof they may be distrained for better issues of their lands and chattles so that the Lord the King now may be answered of better issues of the lands chattles of the same Mayor Cominalty and citizens of the city of London if the same Mayor and C. C. of the city of London in the same court here will not soone appeare to answer the same D. R. and T. Bennet in the plea aforesaid Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of Surrey that he destrain the same Mayor and Cominality citizens of the city of London by all their lands c. And that for the issues See the old Book of entries fol. 226. title distresses pl. 4. accord Surry c. so that he may have their bodies here tres Mich. to answer the said Dorothey Rich. and Tho. Bennet in the plea aforesaid c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here have delivered to Theophi Tipton undersheriff of Surrey present in Court here that same Tearm to execute in Forme of Law c. Elegit M 19. Ja Rot. 1949. Entrey of a writ of Elegit in the same term wherein it was returned not upon the indictment Roll nor upon the Roll of the writ of Scire facias the custom it But note that the writ of Elegit is demanded and adjudged to the enter upon Roll of the entrey of the Scire fac The like form of entrey of Elegit P 10. H. 4. Rot. 140. It was commanded to the sheriff of Derb. whereas lately in the court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster it had been considered that P. Moyl should have execution against Robert Turner Gent. one of the attornies of the Court of the common Bench of the Lord the King here aswell of a certaine debt of 40 l. which the same Prudence in the court of the Lord the King here had recovered against him as of c. which to the same P. in the same court of the King here were adjudged for her damages which she had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted The same Prudence afterwards came into the same court of the Lord the King here and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to her all the goods and Chattles of the same Rob. besids his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough H. 12 Eliz. rot 1470. s. Fylmer T. against L. entry of a Writ of Partition by prec fuit vic P. 12 Eliz Rot 1016. the like upon an extent T. 20. Jac. Rot 2080. B. against M. H. 19 Jac. Rot 3192. S. g. J.T. 1. Caâ— Regis rot 569. M. against C. and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick to hold to her the goods and chattles aforesaid as her
against the law of the land of the Realm of the Lord the King of England unjustly constrained by arrest of his body whereas in truth neither the said I. L. nor the said I. C. nor either of them at the time of the levying of the said plaint or any time afterwards hitherto was Tinner working in any Stannary worke within our Counties of D. or C. And whereas in truth the account aforesaid doth not concerne any Tinner or matter or matters belonging to the said Stannaries Averment that neither Plaintiff or Defendant were Tinneâ—â— Averment that the account did not concern Tâ—nning and although the same I. L the matter aforesaid by him above alleaged before the said Warden Subwarden and steward often pleaded and alleaged in the Stanuary Court aforesaid and offered to prove with inevitable truth and Testimony Neverthelesse the said warden Subwarden steward Deputy or Keeper of the place would not admit of that plea or allegations but altogether refused and the same I. C. notwithstanding the plea alegation probation of the said I. L. aforesaid in the premisses aforesaid the said I L. before the said warden underwarden steward Deputy or Keeper of the place in the plea aforesaid to be condemned with his whole strength indeavoureth and tryeth from day to day in contempt of the Lord the King now and manifest damage impoverishment and greivance of the said L. and against the lawes of the Realme of England and this he is ready to verifie whereupon the said L. humbly imploring the aide and munificence of the Court of the Lord the King now prayeth remedy and a writ of the Lord the King de Prohibitione to the said warden underwarden c. And to the said C. Counsellors Attornies and Solicitors of the said C. in this behalf whatsoever to be directed in Forme of law to prohibit them and every of them that they nor any of them proceed not further in the cause aforesaid or any thing that concerneth the premss in the court aforesaid before the said Warden c. or presume to attempt any thing more in the cause aforesaid in the court aforesaid which may give way to indamage the said I.L. or prejudice of the Law of the Lord the King now his Crowne or dignity and to him it is granted c. Warburton Mich. 25. H. 6. Rot 323. Prohibition without a cause depending against the Bishop of Winchester for excommunicating a man for serving a warrant of peace upon his Chaplain EAster 44. Eliz. Rot. 1738. The like Causa non pendente out of the Court of Request against the corporation of Myners THat this Prohibition causa non pendente being granted upon the motion of Serjeant Hele Justice Gawdy and Warburton Walmesly being absent Nota. And at another day Justice Walmesly being present and Justice Gawdy being absent Justice Walmesly said that the prohibicion lay not Causa non pendente And thereupon the Prohibition did not issue forth though Warburton put his hand to it Yet Gawdy and Walmesly denyed Quare Impedit H 12. H. 7. Rot. 315. Mordent Leic. ss Tho. and Eliz. his wife In Quare Impedit the Plaintiffs have a Writ to the Bishop upon the Bishops plea after the death of the Patron bring their writ of Q. Impedit to present to the Church of N. which is voyd c. And count in right of their Fee of an advouson in grosse against W. Bishop of Lincolne I G. Kt. and R. M. Clerk issue upon the traverse of the advouson in grosse and judgment against the Bish with a cessat c. and the plea depending the patron incumbent dye the Plaintiffs pray execution of the judgment against the Bish and have it c. Ravishment de Gard. Ravishment de gard brought by the King the Kings Attorney by force of the Letters Patents under the privy seal sealed Waives his issue and saith that the Defendant is not guilty and judgment that the defendant go without day the Kings right being saved H 12. H. 7. Rot. 228. Mordant Oxon. ss the King brought his writ of Ravishment de Gard. against I. G. and A. his wife for Ravishment of Richard Son and heire of Edward Bockingham c. the defendant Pleads non cul and afterwards James Hobard attorney of the King and the Defendants come in their proper persons and the Kings Attorney Relicta verificatione c. by vertue of a certaine warrant with the signe manuall of the said Lord the King signed directed to the same James and shewed here in Court on the behalfe of the said Lord the King saith they are not guilty prout c. Therefore it is considered that the said Io. and Anne goe thereof without day c. the Kings right being reserved when at an other time therein she would speak c. Retorn Recordi Return of the Record sent to the Iustice at Lanc. to be tryed after triall in the Bench. AFterwards to wit upon Monday next after tres Pas next following the said C. came back here into Court in his proper person And Humphery C. Justice of the said Lord the King at Lanc. before whom c. sent the record and proceedings cum toto facto suo in the premisses before him at L. in the county aforesaid had in these words Afterwards on monday in quarta septimana LX. before H. C. Iustice of the Lord the King at Lanc. came aswell the within named R. R as the within named R. B. in their proper persons And hereupon the same R. prayeth a writ of the said Lord the King of ve fac here 12. Ven. fac aWarded at Lanc. c. before the said Justice at L. c. to trie the issue within written to be directed to the sheriff of the county of Lanc. which was granted him c. wherupon it was commanded to the sheriff of Lan. that he cause to come before the said Justice at Lanc. upon Tues quarta septimana XL. prox next comming 12. c. of the neighbourhood of C. by whom c. and who neither Return of the Ven. fac c. to recognize c. because aswell c. At which day here came the parties aforesaid c. in their proper persons And E. S. Knight sheriff of the said county of Lanc. returned before the Justices here to wit at L. aforesaid the writ aforesaid in all things served and executed together with the names of the jurors between the parties aforesaid impanelled annexed to the same writ which said jury being solemnly caled came not whereupon it is commanded to the said sheriff of Lanc. that he have before the said Justices here to wit at Lanc. aforesaid upon Wednesday Iury came not in dec quart Sept. 40. next coming the bodies of the said Jurors between the parties aforesaid before impaneled to make that jury the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. at which day of Wednesday here to wit at L.
aforesaid here c. came aswell the same R. as the same R B. in their proper persons and the jurors of the jury aforesaid being called came who being elected tried and sworn to speak the truth of the within contayned said upon their oath ut in Recordo where upon the same Justices at L. peâ—fixed a day to the parties aforesaid before the Justices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench at Westminster Iustice at Lanc. prefixeth a day for the parties to be at West to wit upon Monday nâ—xt after tres Pas next to come to heare their judgment thereof c. therefore c. AFterwards to wit in Oct. Mich. next following Iudgment in Banco after issue tried in the county Pâ—ll of Lanc. upon a mittim of the record there P 4. 5 P. Ma. rot 632. Iudgment in debt here to wit at Westminster which same day the same plaintiff and Defendant have by the prefixment of W R. and N. P. Justices of the said Lady the Queen at L. to heare theire judgment here c. came aswell the said Plaintiff as the said Defendant by their attornies aforesaid and the said Justices at L. sent here his record in these words Afterwards c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the justices here fully understood it is considered that the said plaintiff recover against the said defendant his debt aforesaid And his damages to ten shillings by the jury here in Form aforesaid assessed and also 40 s. to the same plaintiff at his request for his costs and charges aforsaid by the Court here adjudged of increase which said damages in the whole do amount unto 50 s. and the Defendant in mercy c. P 4. Eliz. Rot. 503. Brownlow ss Entry of a Resuâ— in debt against an heir he prayes the Plaint may cease till plea in age and it was granted and after full age a Resum is awarded against a Baron and Feme P 8 Jac Rot 205. Satisfaction for part It was commanded the sheriff whereas I. H. late of c. Spinster daughter and heire of D. H. Gent. lately called c. in the county of Cornwall Gent late in the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England of the Common Bench was summoned to answer E. V. of a plea that she render to him 40 l. which shee then ought him and unjustly detayned for that to wit that whereas the said D. Father of the said Jane whose heir she is in his life time to wit the 21. day of I. An. 22 Eliz Reg. at L. by his certaine bill obligatory which the said S. with the seale of the said D Sealed into the said Court of the Queen brought the date hereof was the same day and year acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said S. 43 l. 16 s. to be paid to the said S. when he shall be thereof required for which payment well and truly to make the said D. had bound his heires executors by the same B. and the said D in his life time of 96 s. thereof to the said S. afterwards satisfied and that the said D. in his life time and the said Jane daughter and heir of the said D. after the Death of the said D. although often required the said 40 l. residue have not rendred but the same to him to render have gainsaid and the same I. to the said D to render yet doth gainesay as the said S. then said The said I. appearing in the said Court of the said Lady the Queen said that she was within the age of 21. Plaint remaineth untill c. yeares And that she intended not nor ought during her minority aforesaid to answer the said S. in the plea aforesaid and prayeth that the plaint aforesaid might remaine unto the full age of the said Jane And because the same S. in the same Court of the Queen did not gainesay that it was considered that the said plaint should remaine untill the full age of the said I. as by the Record thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth and whereas the said S. afterwards to wit the 23. day of I. An. Reg. nunc 3. came into the court of the Lord the King before his Justices Averment of the full age of the Feme and that she is married c. And said that the said Jane was of full Age and that the said Jane after that the said plaint remained without day and before the said 23. of Jan An. 3. c. abovesaid to wit such a day and yeare at L. had taken to husband one A. P. Gent. and is now marryed to the said A. Resummon by good summoners the same A and I. his wife that they be before the Justices of the Lord the said King here at this day to wit such a day to heare the record their judgment of the plaint aforesaid that he should then have here the summons and that writ and now here at this day came the same S. by I. H. his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said A. and I. in the plea aforesaid and they came not Nihil returned And the sheriff to wit N P. Esq now retorneth that they had nothing in his bayliwick whereby they could be summoned and hereupon it is testified in the said court of the Lord the Kâ—ng here that the said A. and I. have sufficient in the county whereby they may be resummoned Testat resummons Therefore the Sheriff of Devo is commanded that he resummon by good summoners the said A. and I. of being here 15. Trini to heare their judgment in the plaint aforesaid the same day is given to the said S. here c. Remissio Recordi The Record remitted Justic Lanc. upon a forraign Voucher P 26 H. 8. rot 337. AFterwards the processe being continued between the parties aforesaid in the plea aforesaid by the Jury put therein between them is respited here untill this day to wit Oct. Mich. then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by forme of the Statute c. on Munday at the Feast of Saint Lawrence next past at Salop in the sayd County of S. first came And now here at this day came the same Executors by their Attorney aforesaid and the same Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Postea c. And because the Court of the King here cannot proceed further in the plaint aforesaid therefore the said plaint is remitted to the Iustices of the said Lord the King of his County Palatine to proceed in the said plaint as of right and according to the Law and Custome of the County Palatine aforesaid is to be done c. And it is sayd to the said F. F. Attorney of the said Executors that the same Executors be before the Iustices of the Lord the King
suit paid to the same M and I twenty five pounds and eight shillings of the said thirty six pounds and five shillings in full satisfaction and payment of the said one hundred pounds nine shillings and four pence to the same M and I in Forme aforesaid owing as by the Record thereof in the same Court of the said late Queene at Guildhall aforesaid remaining manifestly appeareth And the same A further saith That neither the same T at the time of his Death nor the same A after the Death of the same T. before the Day of purchasing the said Writ of Scire facias nor at any time afterwards Nothing else in her hands but goods to such a value which the executrix brings into the Court to pay the plaintiff in part of his debt had any goods or chattells which were of the same T at the time of his Death in her hands to be administred besides goods and chattells to the value of one and thirty pounds five shillings by her in Forme aforesaid administred and besides the goods and chattells to the value of ninety shillings residue of the sayd thirty six pounds five shillings yet remaining in the hands of the sayd A not administred which sayd summ of ninety shillings the same A bringeth here into Court to pay the said E and this she is ready to verifie whereupon she prayeth Judgment if the same E ought to have execution against her for the said 150 l. c. ANd the said E. saith That he by any thing before alledged Replication that no such record of recovery is had in London from having his Execution aforesaid against the same A. for the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. in forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his death in the hands of the said A to be administred ought not to be barred because he saith That there is not had any such Record of the plaint aforesaid betweene the same M. and I. and the same T. in the Court aforesaid remaining as the said A hath above alledged and this he is ready to verifie whereupon as before hee prayeth Judgment and Execution against the said A. of the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. in forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said A to be administred to him to be adjudged c. Rejoynder that such a record is had of a recovery in Lond. ANd the same A. as before saith That such a Record is had of the plaint aforesaid between the same M and I. and the said T. M. in the Court aforesaid remaining as she hath above alleadged and this she is ready to verifie here when and how the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider And hereupon the same A further saith That the Mayor Sheriffs and Aldermen of the City of London Custome of L. alledged by the defendant amongst other Liberties Franchises and priviledges of the Citizens of London by diverse late Kings and Queens of England progenitors of the Lord the King now granted and by the said Lord the King now confirmed they have their liberty that they ought to record every Record pleaded before them made or had presently and not otherwise and therefore prayeth for that the Record aforesaid being now in the custody of the sheriffs of the City aforesaid A certiorare awarded to the Sheriffs of L. to certifie c. a writ of the said Lord the King to be directed to the said now Sheriffs of the city of L to certifie the lustices here whether such a Record be had or not and to her it is granted c. Therefore the Sheriffs of London are commanded that searching the Records and other memorables upon Records in the time of the said late Sheriffs of London being in the custody of the said now Sheriff they make appear to the Iustices here in Cr. Trin. whether there is had such a Record of the plaint aforesaid in their custody as the said A. hath above alledged or not the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. AT which day here came the same E. by his Attorney aforesaid and the same A. the Record of the plaint aforesaid by her above alleadged Judgement for the plaintiff for failer of the record here at this day hath not but made Default thereof therefore it is considered that the said E. have Execution against the said A. of the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the said T in forme aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of the goods and chattells which were of the same T. M at the time of his death in the hands of the said A to be administred c. Brownlow Nota. NOte That after a Scire facias nulla min. Note and study the diversity 19 H 6 19 tr Record 24. Continuance of â—ul tiel record NOte That the Court held that the Defendant ought to procure the Record to he certified at his perill and not stay the Returne or certificate of the Sheriffs against the opinion of Master Brownlow Prothonotary ANd hereupon by the consent of the said Plaintiff further day is given to the said Defendant to have the Record aforesaid by him above pleaded here untill in Oct. Mich. To shew in form aforesaid c. T 43 Eliz rot 1822. Gibson against Brooke Bar upon a Sci. fac against an executor to have execution of his proper goods after a Devastavit returned upon in a writ to inquire what goods came to his hands after suggestion that diverse goods came to his stands and that he had wasted them after a Nulla bona returned upon a fi fa. of the goods of the Testator Suggestion that the executor had wasted diverse goodr of the Testator See the new book of entries fol. 268. 269. 271 and 272. pl. 5. Petâ—fers case title error A writ of fi fa. de bonis testatoris with a writ of inquiry what goods of the testator the executor had wasted M 2 Jac. rot 1812 H 6 Jac. rot 1806. H against B. T 38 Eliz. rot 910 demurrer upon Scire facias quod bre est insufficiens H 33 Eliz rot 612 W against S H 9. H 6 rot 134 Return vic per inquest de office That the goods of the Testator to the value of 110 l after the death of the testator came to the hands of the executor to be administred and that the executor had wasted the goods Scire facias awarded against the executor to have execution of his proper goods ss Otherwise as it appeareth in Hillary Terme last past roll 1434 London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs that of the goods and chattells which were of W B late c. at the time of his death in the hands of G B. Executor of the Testament
of c. in their Bayliwick they should cause to be made as well a certain Debt of a hundred pounds which T G in the Court of the Queen here recovered against him as six pounds as forty shillings which same T. in the said Court here were adjudged for his damages c. Re. Oct. Hillar And now here at this day c. and the Sheriffs Nichil c. And hereupon it is testified in the same Court That the same G. after the death of the same W sold diverse goods and chattells which were of the said W. at the time of his death and the monies received for those goods and chattells converted into his own use and the residue of the goods and Chattells which were of the said W were eloyned or to his own use converted with the intention that the said Execution should not be done Therefore it is commanded the Sheriffs that of the goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death being in the hands of the said G. they should cause to be made the Debt and damages aforesaid If they can be found in their Bayliwick otherwise by the Oath of honest and lawfull men of their Bailiwick they should make diligent enquiry what goods and chattells that were of the said W at the time of his death by the said G after the death of the said W are sold or eloyned or converted to the use of the said G. and what they shall finde by that Inquisition the sheriffs should make appear here such a day under their seale c. and seales c. the same day is given to the said T here c. At which day here came the said T by his Attorney aforesaid and the Sheriffs to wit T. C. and W. C. now return a certain inquisition taken before them at Guild Hall of the City of London by the oath of twelve c. by vertue of the Writ aforesaid taken by which it is found that diverse goods and chattells which were of the said W. B. at the time nf his death to the value of one hundred and ten pounds came to the hands of the same G. B. after the death of the same W. B. to be administred and that the same G. had converted all the same goods and chattells to his own use Therefore it is commanded the Sheriffs that by honest and lawfull men of their Bailiwick they should make known to the said G that hee should be here alia die to shew if he had or knew any thing to say for himselfe wherefore the said T Execution against him for the Debt and Damages aforesaid of his own goods and chattells ought not to have c. according to the Form of the Recovery aforesayd if c. Nihil returned Al fi fac awarded At which day here came the said T. by his Attorney aforesaid and the Sheriffs now returned that he hath nothing c. nor is found c. Therefore as before it is commanded the Sheriffs that by honest c. they make known to the said G. that he should be here at this day to shew in Forme aforesaid c. Defendant appeares And now here at this day came as well the same T. by his Attorney aforesaid as the said T. premonished c. by T. W. his Attorney and the sheriffs now return that the said G hath nothing c. nor is found c. hereupon the said T prayeth Execution against the said G of the Debt and Damages aforesaid Prayes Execution of his proper goods Quere of the proper goods and chattells of the said G to be levied to him to be adjudged c. Quaere if such a Writ be usuall See Petifers case Coke 5 fol. 32. That such writ Est male Barr by confession that execution ought to be against him for the damages of his proper goods but as to the debt pleads fully administred before the Teste of the originall against funeralls and payment of debts and that he had not the goods found by the inquisition nor wasted c. and the eupon a demurrer Plene administravit specially pleaded about funeralls payments of debts and other necessaries c And traverseth the wast found by the inquest of office Judgement for the defendant after demurrer Nota And the same G as to the Damages aforesaid saith That he cannot gainsay but the same T ought to have Execution against him for those Damages of the proper goods and chattells of the said G. according to the recovery aforesaid therefore it is considered that the said T. have Execution against the said G. of the Damages aforesaid of the proper goods and chattells of the same G. according to the Recovery aforesaid and as to the Debt aforesaid the said G. saith That the same T ought not to have Execution for that Debt of the said proper goods and chattells of the said G by pretence of the Recovery and inquisition aforesaid because he saith That he before the day of purchasing the Originall writ of the said T. fully administred all the goods and chattells which were of the said W.B. at the time of his death about the Funerall and payment of Debts of the said W. and other necessary things to be done and administred by the same G as Executor of the Testament of the same W. and then nor at any time afterwards had not nor yet hath any goods or chattells which were of the said W B in his hands to be administred nor goods or chattells in the inquisition aforesaid above contained or any of them or any other goods which were of the said W B at the time of his death to his proper use converted or otherwise wasted and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgement if the said T execution against him for the Debt aforesaid of the proper goods of the said G. by pretence of the Recovery and Inquisition aforesaid in Forme aforesaid ought to have c. And thereupon the plaintiff demurrs in law and judgment for the Defendant which judgement was afterwards reversed in the Kings Bench by writ of Error That the first issue was Non est factum Testatoris and found against the Defendant and thereupon judgement and a Fieri Facias and the sheriff returned Nichil and upon a Testat Devastavit a writ of ad inquirend de Wast and wast found by Inquisition and thereupon this Scire facias to the Defendant who appears and pleads Two Scire facias Where the Defendant pleads Plene administravit Nota. and assets are sound and judgment thereupon and the sheriff returns a devastavit such speciall Devastavit is not a good plea for that it is contrary and repugnant to the sheriffs Return but in such case such Inquisition may be traversed HIll 33. Eliz. rot 612. Between W and S. Scire facias against an Executor upon a surmise that the Executor had wasted the goods of the Testator against which
Judgment was given and in that case the Defen after Tryall and a speciall verdict given compounded with the plaintiff by the advise of I. P. Knight cheif Justice of England M 39. and 40. Eliz Rot. 110. ss Otherwise as it appeareth c. as in the Scire Facias and award the Alias Scire Facias Bar upon an Alias Sci fac upon a recognizance of priviledge where one makes default and the other pleads in bar payment of the condemnation at the perill of the Principall against him before the Teste of the first Scire facias Execution awarded against one of the Conuzers by default c. and now here at this day to wit at the said Tres Tri. came aswell the said I. by his Attorney aforesaid As the said S. by I E. his attorney And the said H. the fourth day of the Plea came not but made default And the sheriff as before now returneth that the said H. hath nothing nor is Found c. And hereupon the said I. prayeth execution against the said H. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered that the said I. have execution against the said H. for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged by default c. And further the said I. prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the said I. prayeth license thereof to imparl here untill Oct. Mich. And hath it c the same day is given to the said I. here c and now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. S. Mich. came here aswell the same I. as the said S. by their attornies aforesaid And hereupon the same I. as before prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be adjudged him c ANd the said S. saith that the said I ought not to have execution a-against him for the said 50 l. in the Form aforesaid acknowledged Bar that the principall after the recovery and before the Teste of the Sci fac paid to the Conuzee the debt and damages recovered because he saith that the said E after the judgment aforesaid given And before the day of the purchasing of the said first Writ of Scire Facias to wit T. Die and An. paid to the said I the debt damages aforesaid by him against the said E in form aforesaid recovered according to the form and effect of the Recognizance aforesaid And this he is ready to verifie where upon he prayeth Judgment if the same I. ought to have execution against him for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. Replication that the principall non solint and issue thereupon ANd the said I. saith that he by any thing before alleaged ought not to be repelled from having his execution aforesaid of the said 50 l. against the said S. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged because he saith that the said E. after the judgment aforesaid given and before the day of purchasing of the said first writ of Scire Facias hath not paid to the same I. the debt and damages aforesaid by the same I. against the said E. in Form aforesaid recovered according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid As the said S. hath above allowed and this he prayeth may bee inquired of by the Country And the said S. likewise Therefore 12. c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Ter-tenants upon a judgment in debt after the death of the Obliger and the judgment by default Recitall of the recovery PAs 38. Eliz Rot. 1854. ss Otherwise as it appeareth in the Term of S. Hillary An. 38 Eliz. Reg. Rot. 511. It is thus contained Midd. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. S. Esquire lately in the court of the Lady the Queen now to wit in the Term of St. Michael An. regni sui 30. and 31. before E A. Knight and his associates of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against I. C late of London Esquire aswell a certaine debt of 19 l. as 7 l. which c. whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings in the court of the Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon And the said I. C is dead and dyed seised of divers Lands and Tenements in his Demesne as of Fee as by the information of the said H. the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given Suggestion of the death of the Defendant and averment that he died seised of divers lands c. Sci. fac to the Ter-tenants or at any time afterwards That they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. Pur. St. Mariae to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said H. ought to have execution against them of the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements afore said according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid and now here at this day came the same H. by F B. his attorney and offered himself the 4th day against the said Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time oft he judgment aforesaid given or at anytime afterwards in the plea aforesa d and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that there are no lands nor Tenements in his Bayliwick which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given The Sheriff returneth quod milli sunt Tenements A Testat sci fac prayed Corn Testat sci fac awarded to the Ter-tennants in a foraign County or any time afterwards and here upon it is testified in the same court of the Queen here that there are divers lands and Tenements in the county of C. which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards whereof he might make and levy the debt and damages aforesaid and prayeth a writ of the Lady the Queen to be directed to the sheriff of Cornwall to premonish the tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. in Oct. S. Mich. An. 30. and 31. abovesaid which day judgment was thereupon given or at any time afterwards in his Bayliwick that they be here 15. Pas to shew c. And now here at this day to wit the said 15 Pas came the same H. by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4th day against the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the
of the Dower of the said M. of one Messuage 29. acres of land c. with the appurtenances in M. from the time of the death of the said R her late husband c. As for their damages which they had by occasion of the detayning of the Dower whereof he is convicted as by the Record proceedings therein in the Court of the Queen here remayning manifestly appeareth Tenant in the writ of dower after judgment dieth Sci fac awarded against the son and heir Neverthelesse excution of the judgement aforesaid yet resteth und on And the same T. B. is dead as by the information of the said W. and M. the Queen understands and because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to E. B. son and heir of the said T. who holdeth the lands and tenements which were of the said T. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said W. and M ought not to have execution against him of the value of the Damages aforesaid of the Lands and Tenements aforesaid according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if c. Return de vic Alias Scâ— fac awarded And now here at this day came the same W. and M. by I. G. their attorney and offered themselves the 4th dâ—y against the said E. of the plea aforesaid And he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing c. nor is found c. Therfore as before the sheriff is commanded that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said E. that he be here 15. Marti to shew in Form aforesaid if c. And now here at this day to wit the said 15. Marti came aswell the same W. and M. by their attorney aforesaid as the same E. premonished c. by W. D. his Attorney Sci fac returned but note that the Sheriff doth not return of what lands the son and heiâ— is tenant according to the point in the writ And the sheriff to wit R. I. Esquire now retorneth that he made knowne to the said E. of being here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid by T. D. and I. G. honest c. And hereupon the said W. M. prayeth Execution against the said E. of the value and damages aforesaid of the lands and tenements aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. and the said E. reserving to himself all and all manner of exceptions and advantages aswell to the said writ of Scire fac as to the declaration aforesaid prayeth imparlance here untill Oct. S. Hill and hath it c. Speciall imparlance The same day is given to the said W. and M here c. At which day c. and from thence imparleth untill Oct. Mich And now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. Mich. came aswell the said W. M as the said E. by their Attornies aforesaid and hereupon the said W. and M as before prayeth execution against the said E. of the value and Damages aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. And the said E saith nothing in bar or hinderance of the execution of the said W. and M aforesaid by which the same W. and M. remaine against the said E. and thereof without defence therefore it is considered that the said W. and M. have Execution against the said E. of the value and Damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements aforesaid by default c. And because it is not knowne what Lands and Tenements the same T had at the day of his death in Fee-simple Judgment by nichil dic Suggestion to have a Writ to inquire of the value of the lands awarded nor how much those Lands and Tenements were worth by the yeare according to the true value thereof it is commanded the sheriff that by the oath of honest and Lawfull men of his Bayliwick he diligently inquire what Lands and Tenements the said T. had the day of his death in the Bayliwick of the said sheriff And if the said T. died seised of any Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances in Fee-simple Then how much those Tenements were worth by the yeare in all issues beyond reprises Quaere for these words are neither perfect nor good And after such inquisition by the sheriff made he deliver the same Lands and tenements to the same W. and M without delay according to the true value of them to hold to the same W. and M. untill the said 45 l. and 10 s for the value and damages aforesaid thereof be levyed c. and in asmuch c. the sheriff make appeare here 15. Mich. At which day there came the said W. and M by their attorney aforesaid and the sheriff to wit Quaere de rest matter I. B. Knight now retorneth here a certaine Inquisition c. that the father was seised in Fee of 22. acres of Land at the day of his death to the value of 9 s. 8 d. which said 22 acres of Land the sheriff delivers intirely c. Debt against fâ—ur Executors two appear and the Plaint tame against the same two with a simul cum c. Judgment against the four and the two that appeared onely a mercied H 12. H. 7. rot 361 Mordant Devon ss Roger Viell brought his Accompt of debt against Nich. Yeo. and Eliz. his wife executors of Eliz. Mounck executrix of I. Mounck that they together with W. Mo. and H. Mounck should render to him 38 l. 17 s. upon bill obligatory made for the payment of 64 l. 19 s. 7 d. ob and satisfaction confessed for 26 l 2 s. 7 d. ob by the testator Notwithstanding the executors although often requested c. have not rendred c. And the same N. and Eliz his wife together with those c. to him to render gain say and unjustly detaine c. and the same Nicholas and Ann confesse the account and judgment that the plaintiffe should recover against the said Nicholas and Elizabeth W. and Humphery the debt and damages to 10 s. de bonis testatoris levand and the said Micholas and Eliz. in mercy c. and the damages remitted A Sci. fac was brought against the Executors upon this judgment as followeth H 13. H. 7. Rot. 309. Mordant Devon ss R. U. brought his scire fac upon the judgment next above against the said executors to have execution upon the said judgment retorned Cr. Trin. the sheriff retorneth Scire Feci to Humphery Mounck one of the executors who commeth Sci fac upon the judgment abovesaid c. And nothing against the other two Executors which came not and the said Humphery pleaded ne unq Execut. The Plaintiff saith that he ought not to be barred from having his execution aforesaid upon the judgment aforesaid and notwithstanding the said plea of the said Humphery above
Assizes and Execution therein awarded at B. before the day in the Bench. P 28. H 8. rot 438. Ayde of the King granted in a Scire facias to execute a fine between Melton and the Earle of Northumberland EAster 34 Edw. 1. rot 27. A sci fa. brought by the King upon a judâ—ment in an assise Darrein presentment had by the King by reason of the wardship of an ideot brought against man and wife an estranger upon disturbance Defendant pleads that the lessor was respited untill 8 Hil. for default of the Recognitors c. ss It was commanded the sheriff that whereas the Lord the King in the Court here to wit in 8 sancti Martini Anno Reg. 21. had recovered against H C. and I his wife and R. B. the presentation to the Church of W hy reason of the Lands of R. W. a Fool and in the Kings custody by which it was commanded the Bishop of Winchester that notwithstanding wreck-land of the said I and R. B. hee should admit of a fit Parson to the said Church at the Presentation of the King by vertue of which said command the said Bishop admitted one I S his Clerke at his presentation to the Church aforesaid and the said Church by the resignation of the said I. S. Clerke is now void and belongeth to his Donation by reason of the custody aforesaid the same H. I. and R. B. do not permit the sayd King to present a fit parson to the Church aforesaid in contempt of the Lord the King c. and his immoderate losse and vexation We command you that by honest c. you shall make known c. to shew c. wherefore the Lord the King ought not to present a fit parson to the Church aforesaid by reason of the custody aforesaid c. And now here at this day came N. W. who followeth for the Lord the King and the same H. and R. came not and the sheriff now testifieth that he made known to them of being here c. by T. D. and F. E. whereupon the said N. W. who c. prayeth Execution by default of the said H. and R. And hereupon came the said Ioane and one Isabel the wife of the said R. and the same Joane assevering the same Advowson to be the right of the said Ioane and the same Isabell assevering the same Advowson to be the right of the same Isabell say That the Lord the King now by that writ nor also by vertue of the Record from whence that Writ issued ought not to have Execution therein because the said Isabel saith That she is joyntly enfeoffed of the advowson aforesaid together with the said R her husband and prayeth that she for default of her husband c. and prayeth to be admitted c. and the same Joan well knoweth that the Lord the King otherwise in the Court of the King here in Cro saucti Martini Anno supradict superdico arrayed the said Assize ult praesentationis against the said H. the same Ioan and the same R of the advowson of the Church aforesaid at which said assize they personally appearing pleaded and then put themselves upon that Assize so that then it was considered that the said Assize should be taken but that it should be respited here untill in 8 Hil then next following for defect of Recognitors c and say that afterwards in the same that Assize depending thereof between them undecided The Attorney confesseth the action without warrant in deceit of his client as is before said the Attorney of them the said H and Iâ—and of the said R again appeared in the same Court without warrant and granted to the said Lord the King presentation to the said Church that turne c. reserving the right of the said H I and R when they would speake therein wherefore whereas that Court had no authority or Jurisdiction to admit of the grant of the attorney of the said A I and R of the Advowson of the Church aforesaid upon the said Writ of Assize ultimo praesentationis which was respited here untill another Term to come pray judgement if any Execution upon such grant after the said Assize as aforesaid was respited ought to be made c. And because this same is found by the Record of the same Rolls of this Terme it is considered that the said Ioan and Isabell go thereof without day c. and whatsoever shall be done by pretence of the said Grant made after the Assize aforesaid was respited as aforesaid Judgment against the King shall be null and void and the Lord the King may bring an originall writ c. P 27 Edw. 1. rot 127 ss A Scire facias for the Tenant against the Vouchee to shew if any thing Scire facias brought by a Tenant in recovery to have execution of Lands in value against the voucher c. wherefore the Tenements aforesaid of the lands of the said Vouchee to the value of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in a competent place hee ought not to have c. Judgement against the plaintiff in Sci. fac for execution of a fine H 5 H 6 rot 304 ss In a Scire facias for executing a fine judgement was given against the plaintiff as followeth therefore it is considered that the said Plaintiff shal take nothing by his writ of scire facias but that the said Defendant go there of without day c. Sci fac upon a judgement in debt where the Defendant before execution fraudulently conveyed his lands and took sanctuary to the intent to defeat the plaintiff of his debt ss T 71 H 4 rot 109. Scire facias against one that made a Feoffment of his Tenements by Fraud and Covin and tooke Sanctuary but the said Defendant intending the plaintiff from the Execution of his debt and damages aforesaid maliciously to retard gave and granted divers lands and Tenements goods and chattells within his Bailiwick to divers certain persons by collusion between them had to wit that the Defendant should receive the profits thereof to his own use which same Defendant the profits thereof notwithstanding the said gift received and yet doth receive and fled to the liberty of the Abbot of W. and within the same Liberty stayed and there liveth upon the profits of his Lands and Tenements goods and chattells aforesaid as by the information c. praying according to the Form of the statute in this case made to be provided of a fit remedy in this behalf c. and because c. M 3 H 4 rot 11 5. ss Scire fac for Execution of Damagesr recovered in an Assize of fresh force in the City of Canterbury Sci. fac for damages in an assize of fresh force also for forty shillings according to the forme of the statute thereof made for that that the Defendant brought not the Record by him pleaded in Barr of the Assize according to the forme of the
outlawry aforesaid it was manifestly erred in this that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid were and at the day of purchasing of the originall Writ aforesaid and also from the time wherof the memory of man is not to the contrary there were two Townes one called Humby the great the other Humby the lesser and neither Towne was named or called Humby alone without addition and this he was ready to veryfie whereupon he then prayeth judgment and that the utlawry aforesaid for the said Error and c. others in the Record proceedings aforesaid being might be revoked adnulled taken altogether for nothing And he to the common Law of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England and also to all things which he had lost by the occasion of the utlawry aforesaid might be restored c. And then the said T. B. prayed a writ of the said Lady the Queen to premonish the said Charles of being before the said Lady the Queen to hear the record and proceedings aforesaid and it was granted him Scire facias c. Whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said Charles that he should be before the said Lady the Queen in Oct. S. Marti then next following wheresoever c. to hear the record and proceedings if c. and further c. the same day then given to T. B. c. And hereupon then came W K. of c. Gent. S. T. of the parish c. Gent. I D of London Yoeman and L. R c. and undertook for the same Iohn Beverly to have the body of the same Thomas before the said Lady the Queen at the same Term The plaintiff bayled corpus pro corpore and so from that day untill c. every of the said Manucaptors body for body c. at which said Oct. Martini before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the said Thomas B. in his proper person and the sheriff of the said county of Lincoln then returned there that by vertue of the said writ to him directed by G. S. and R. B. honest c. he had made knowne to the said Charles B. of being before the said Lady the Queene at the day and place in the same Writ contained to hear the record and proceedings aforesaid if c. according to the exigency of that writ which the said C. B. the 4. day of the plea being solemnly called by S. W. his attorney came whereupon the said Thomas as before then said that in the record proceedings aforesaid and also in the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid it was manifestly Erred alledging the Error aforesaid by him in form aforesaid alledged and prayeth that the utlawry aforesaid for that error and others in the record and proceedings aforesaid found might be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that he to the Common Law of the Realme of the Lady the Queen of England and also to all things that he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost might be restored and that the said Charles might rejoyne to the said Error And the same C. prayeth licence therein to imparl and it was granted him c. here upon day therein was given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen here untill in 8. S. Hill then next following wheresoever c. to wit the said Charles Baudes of speaking to the said Error and then to rejoyne to that Error at which said Oct. S. Hill before the said Lady the Qu. at Westminster came aswell the said T. B. in his proper person as the same Ch. by his attorney aforesaid And the same C. then said that the utlawry aforesaid ought not to be revoked because he said that within the County of Lincoln aforesaid was and at the same tine of the purchasing of the originall writ aforesaid and also from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary there is one Towne called and known aswell by the name of Humby alone as by the name of Humby the great this he was ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the judgment aforesaid in all things might be confirmed And the said Thomas Beverly as beforesaid That within the said County of Lincolne were and at the same time of purchasing of the originall writ and also for the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary were two Towns the one called H. the great the other called H. the lesser without this that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid was and at the same time of purchasing c. was one Towne called and known by the name of H. only Travers as by the name of H. the great in manner and Form as the said C. B. above in pleading had alleadged and this he was ready to verifie whereupon as before he prayed that the utlawry aforesaid might be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that he to the common Law of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England and to all things which he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost might be restored c. And the same Charles as before said that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid there was and at the same time of purchasing of the originall writ aforesaid was one Towne called and knowne aswell by the name of Hu. only as by the name of Humbly the greater in manner and Forme as the said Charles had above alledged and of this he put himself upon the Country and the said Thomas likewise therefore it was then commanded the sheriff of the said County of Lincoln that he should cause to come before the Lady the Queene in Oct. Pur. 12. of the body of the County of Lincoln by whom c. And recite the Postea who say upon their oath that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid there is not nor at the within written time of purchasing of the said originall writ within writien was there a Towne called and knowne aswell by the name of Humby only as by the name of Humby the great as the same Thomas B. hath within alledged whereby it was then considered in the same Court there that the utlawry aforesaid should be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing and the same Thomas B. to the common Law of this Realm of England and to all things that he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost should be restored c. And this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said Thomas Beveley may be barred from having execution against him of the judgment aforesaid c. Judgment was given against the Queen quaere T 11. Jac. rot 707. Brownlow ss Otherwise as it appeareth A Scire faciâ—s brought against the principaâ—l and bayl to prosecute an Audita querela where judgment was given for the plaintiff upon Nil capiat pro bre Pas 11.
aforesaid were sold and eloyned to the same I. Armour ought not to be returned or for defect of Return of the same Cattell the Price of them of the lands and chattells of the same I W. and W. B. in your Bailiwick to be made and rendred to the same I A according to the forme of the statute therein made and of the pledges abovesaid the same sheriff to the same Justices of the Lord the King at that day returned that the same I W and W B have nothing in his Bailiwick by which he could make known to them nor were found in the same whereby the said I. A. from having return aforesaid hath received a very long delay whereupon he hath besought the Lord the King to exhibit justice to him and that the statutes of the Kingdome of the Lord the King made for the bettering of the same may remaine stable the King will for the benefit of his Leige people by speediest remedyes consonant to the same statutes that by honest c. hee should make known to W. L. late sheriff of the County aforesaid predecessor of the now sheriff who took the pledges aforesaid in Forme aforesaid that he should be here at this day to wit in 8 sancti Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. wherefore he so many cattell to wit two horses and eighty sheep as the same I. A. took from the same I. C. as in the same Court he hath avowed Sci. fac returned or the price of them for the insufficiency of the pledges aforesaid to the same I. A. in the name of the Returne of the Cattell aforesaid ought not to render according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid Judgement ' by default and the awarding of a writ to take of the said sheriff totanimali vel prec and to deliver them to the plaintiff Nomine returni if c. And now here at this day cometh the same I. A. in his proper person and the said W.L. late sheriff 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that hee made known to the said late sheriff of being here at this day to shew in Forme aforesaid by I.S. and W.C. Therefore it is considered that the same I. A. have of the late sheriff two horses and eighty sheep to the value of the other goods aforesaid which the said I. A. late took or the price of them and a writ to the sheriff to take of the late sheriff the Cattell aforesaid or the price of them and them or that to the same I. A. in the name of the Returne of the other cattell aforesaid to deliver c. Count in Sci. fa. upon a Recognizance acknowledged in the Country before a Justice of the common Bench and afterwards delivered to be inrolled and is enrolled in the same Terme in which it was delivered to be inrolled H. 8. Eliz. rot 104 3. H. 15. Jac. rot 21. in t Pl. ter and there rot 80. a recognizance is entred with a condition T. 21. Jac. rot 73. or 78. the like Inrollment of a recognizonce with the Terme number of the roll extressed Mich 28. and 29. Eliz. rot â—046 Generall entry of a recognizance taken before a Justice of the Common Bench and a Scire facias thereupon M 20 Jac. rot 843. Brownlow otherwise as it appeareth in Michaelmas Terme 19. Jac. rot 1906. It is thus contained Oxon ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas R. H. of S in the County of Oxon Esquire the twentieth day of Iuly Anno c. 18. and Scotland 53. before Peter Warburton Knight then one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench of the City of Oxford in the County aforesaid acknowledged himself to owe to Richard Farmer of S. in the County aforesaid Knight one thousand Markes of lawfull mony of England which he ought to have paid him at the Feast of the birth of our Lord then next following which same Recognizance the same Peter Warburton afterwards to wit the twelfth day of February in the Terme of Saint Hillary Anno 18 abovesaid delivered here in Court with his own proper hands to be there inrolled upon Record and there before Henry Hobart Knight Cheife Justice of the Lord the King of Common Bench and his Associates Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench in the same Terme of Saint Hillary it is enrolled upon Record which said one thousand Markes the same R to the said R. hath not yet paid as by the information of the said R. the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. hee should make known to the said Ralph that hee should be here at this day to wit A die sancti Michaelis in unam mensem to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said one thousand Markes ought not to be made of his Lands and chattells in your Bailiwick and rendred to the same R. according to the Forme of the Recovery aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same Richard by Thomas G. his Attorney as the sayd Ralph forenamed c. by Io. Wells his Attorney and hereupon the same Richard prayeth Execution against the same Ralph of the said one thousand Markes of the Lands and chattells of the same Ralph to be made by pretext of the Recog aforesaid to him to be adjudged and the same Ralph prayeth the hearing of the Recognizance aforesaid and it is read unto him c. And also prayeth the hearing of the Condition of the same Recognizance and it is read unto him in these words The condition of this Recognizance is such That if the said Ralph Holte his Heâ—â—â— or Assignes shall and will for his and their parts well and truly observe fullfill and keep the Award Doome and Order of Sir Thomas Spencer Knight and Baronet and Edw. Sheldon Esquire for and concerning Suits matters and controversies moved depending or being between the said Ralph Holte on the one part and the above named Sir Richard Farmer on the other part for and concerning the Common for foure hundred sheep and right for keeping conyes in and upon the grounds called Bayards green in the County of Oxford and all Commons and other profits claimed therein by the said Ralph Holte and the Right Title and possession of the same Common and keeping of Conyes so as the said Sir Thomas Spencer and Edward Sheldon do make their sayd Award touching the premisses or any part thereof on this side the Feast day of the Nativity of our Lord next coming after the Date hereof and do cause the same to be put in writing under their hands and seales ready to be delivered unto the said Ralph Holt then this present Recognizance to be void or else to stand in force and vertue which being read and heard the Defendant prayeth imparlance and hath it c. And it is continued by imparlance untill Cr. Tri. 20. Jac. at
Entry of a Scire fac against 1. execut to have execution upon a Sc. fac against 2 executors the sheriff retorneth no goods in the hands of one and a Devastavit against the other ib Entry of a Scire fac and of a generall acquittance pleaded in Barr thereunto ib. Entry of a Scire fac against Coheires who make default and execution awarded pro Portion de hereditate conting 140 Entry of Scire fac against tenants for exempting a fine and demurrer for the non-age of the heire ib. Entry of a Scire fac against a Termor ib Entry of a Scire fac brought by heire of the plaint in partition who after judgment and before partition made dyed ib. Entry of a Scire fac to have execution seisin de novo for that the sheriff in favour of the tenant had not duly made his executions pleas and judgments for the plaintiff upon demurrer 141 Entry of a Scire fac in a Quare impedit the defendant pleads in bar that Pendente Brevi de quare impedit the plaintiff was utlawed and that he resigned c. 135 Entry of a Scire fac against principall baile to prosecute an Audita Querela Entry of a Scire fac where lands are extended by the plaintiff where the sheriff returns that he extended the same lands upon an other writ of Elegit and delivered them c. and that he cannot deliver them to the plaintiff untill the first debt be levied 149 Entry of a Scire fac against a conusee in a statute merchant brought by the Conusor to have back the possession of Lands extended for that he is satisfied 152 Entry of the like Scire facias upon promise that the Conusee is satisfied Per fluxum temporis speciall pleadings ibid. Entry of a Scire facias after a Devastavit returned brought by the Administrators of the Plaintiff after Iudgement upon the Devastavit to have Execution de bonis proprij 150 Entry of a Sci. fac against a sherif for taking of insufficient pledges in Repleg 151 Entry of a Scire facias upon a Recognizance acknowledged before a Judge of the Common Bench in the Country 156 Entry of an Inrollment of a Recognizance with the Term and number roll expressed and a Scire facias thereupon ibid. Entry of a Testat Scire facias against Ter-Tenants upon the Sheriffs returne who say that there is another Ter-Tenant in another County Non praemonuit and pray that they may not answer to the Writ of Scire facias usque alius praemoniatur adjudged a good plea and a Replication c. 146 Entry of a Scire facias against Ter-Tenants of Lands tempore judicii reddit who came not and a Writ of Elegit is awarded c. 161 Entry of a Scire facias Ter-tenants two are returned 1 makes default Execution awarded against him of Lands whereof he is Tenant and the other pleads 162 Entry of diverse Testat Scire facias awarded into severall Counties against the Ter-Tenants ibid. Entry of a Scire facias by the Heire and Executor of the Demandant to have Judgement in an Assise of Niusance Quod nocumentum amoveatur and for Damages after the Record of the Assise is certified into the Vpper Bench plea and judgement by Nil dic ibid. Entry of a Sci. fac for the tenant in a writ of Dower to have execution of the lands to the value of the third part recovered in Dower after Seisin had of the third part demanded 165 Entry of a Scire facias sued out by Administrators upon a judgement had by them as Administrators c. without shewing the Letters of Administration ibid. Entry of a Sci. fac against a Sheriff to render to the Plaintiff so many cattell as were replevied by him by pledges for that the pledges are insufficient 166 Entry of a Writ of Scire facias in debt for the Demandant against a stranger Judgement that the demandant have the third part c. 169 Entry of a Writ of Scire facias upon a judgement in a Writ De anuo redditu to have execution De arreragiis incursis after judgement ibid. Entry of a Scire facias to take Bail where one comes to the bar and pleads matter in bar to an Outlawry 170 Entry of a Scire facias awarded and returned after a Capias upon statute Merchant into the Bench 171 Entry of a Scire facias against Manucaptors 173 Entry of a Scire fac in Audita que resa 174 Entry of a Scire fac after a Scire fac against Ter-tenants with the retorne of the writ 175 In all cases wherein baile is required if the defendant die before a non est inventus retorned upon the Scire fac the baile is discharged ib. Seisin Entry of a writ of Hab. fac fesinam in dower and the returne thereof 177 Summons Entry of a writ of Summons in an attaint executed and awarding of resummons against the defendant 179 Entry of the like writ with the awarding of a Distringas against the grand jury the party and petty Jury ib. Entry of a Summons in a Quare impedit with the essoine and attachment awarded for default ib. Spec entry of a summons in a Quare impedit the Sheriff returns a tarde and another awarded 181 Entry of an alias summons in a quare impedit in severance and an attachment awarded against the defendant ib. Surrender The surrender of a Philizer office 181 The like entry ib. The like entry ib. The like entry ib. Supersedeas Entry of a Supersedeas to a Capias in Withernam quia inconsult emanavit averia elongat retorned 182. Entry of a Supersedeas to an Exegent and pledges de novo 184 Entry of a Supersedeas in the upper Bench to discharge sureties of peace in the Common Bench ib. Entry of a Supersedeas after a fieri fac ne vendi exponas 185. Ventre inspiciendo Entry of a writ de ventre inspiciendo 186 Utlary Entry of non omittas upon a Capias Utlegat 187 Entry of a reversall of an utlary against an intestate prosecuted by an administrator for defect in the returne of the Writ of Exigent 188 Entry of a reversall of an Vtlawry for defect in the Proclamations 189 Entry of a traverse of a Commorance in another County and reversall of the Vtlary Pur non commorance c. 191 Entry of a confession by the Garnisee ibid. Entry of a confession by the Attorney Generall upon a Testimony and reversall of the Vtlawry ibid. Entry of a speciall Writ of Capias utlagat and amerciament of the sheriff for bad attendance upon the Court ibid. Entry of a speciall Amerciament against the Coroners for not certifying of an Vtlawry after a Certiorare to them made ibid. Entry of a reversall of an Vtlawry for insufficient return of the certiorare 193 Entry of a reversall for variance between the record and the writ of Exigent 194 Entry of a reversall for that the cap. whereupon the exigent
Tenant had not duly made his execution Suff. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas William Ayleff Esquire Barbara his wife lately in the court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered their seisin against I. A. of the third part of the Mannor of Abbotts with the appurtenances in D. c. and whereas also at the prosecution of the same W. and B out of the said Court of the Lady the Queen here of and upon the judgment aforesaid to wit the 6. day of November An. 42. Eliz. issued forth a certaine writ of the Lady the Queen de Sesina directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid By which said Writ the said Lady the Queen commanded the said sheriff that he should know that the same W and B. in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the common Bench here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid had recovered their seisin against the said I. of the said third part of the Mannor of Abbotts in the appurtenances and 8 messuages c. with the appurtenances as the Dower of the said Barbara of the indowment of Martin A. her late husband c. whereupon the said Lady the Queen now to the said sheriff commandeth that the said W. and B. full seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them in severalty by meats and bounds he should cause to be had and in as much as he should that precept of the Lady the Queen he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lady the Qu. here to wit at VVestminster in 8. Hill then next following which said Writ of seisin afterwards to wit the 16. day of Ianuary then next following at Y. aforesaid in the county aforsaid to E. B. Esquire then sheriff of the County aforesaid being was delivered to be executed in Form of Law And also by the information of the said W. and B. the same Lady the Queen hath understood that the said Edward favouring the same I. A. and indeavouring wholely to defraud the same W. and B of the recovery of the third part aforesaid afterwards to wit the 17. day of Jan. An. 43. abovesaid caused to be had to the same W. and B. full seisin of 1 Messuage in E aforesaid late in the tenure c. to hold to the same W. and B as the Dower of the same B. of the Indowment of the said Martin her late husband in the same mannor of A. and to the Tenements and Rents aforesaid in Y. c. contingent as by the Record and proceedings here in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen remayning manifestly appeareth whereas notwithstanding all and singular the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B. by the said Ed. Bacon for the third part of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in Forme aforesaid delivered and assigned are not parcell of the mannor lands and Tenements aforesaid wherof the same W. and B. have recovered their third part in forme as aforesaid to the immoderate damage and grievances of the said W. and B. whereupon they have supplycated the said Lady the Queen to adhibet to them a fit remedy in this behalfe the same Lady the Queen not being willing in any wise to injure the same W. and B. But being willing that compleat justice be don and used to them in this behalfe that by honest c he should make known to the same I. that he should be here at this day to wit in 8. Mi. to shew if any thing c. Wherefore omitting the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned the same W. B seisin and execution of the said third part of the mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the said W. and B. have recovered their third part in Form as aforesaid according to the Form of the recogniz aforesaid against the same I. ought not to have if c. THe Defendant appeareth and saith that the said W. and A. any further execution of the third part aforesaid of the mannor and Tenements c. aforesaid with the appurtenances by them above recovered against him ought not to have because he sayeth that well true it is c. And confesseth the Recovery the writ of seisin and the return thereupon and that the Defendant entred into the land and further saith That the said messuage 3. acres of Land c. in D. aforesaid to the same W. B by the same E. B. for the third part of the mannor c. in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned are parcell of the mannor and Tenements whereof the same W. B. have recovered their seisin of the third part abovesaid in Form as aforesaid and this c. Judgment for the Tenant upon the demurrer And demurrer for that the writ lyeth not but afterwards an other Writ generall was brought And it was adjudged to be well brought See Hill 25. Rot. 650. P. 9. Jac. rot 656. Entry of a Sci. fac in a Quare Impedit T 30. Eliz. rot 1308. Lincoln ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Thomas Beverly Gent. in the Court of the Lady the Queen now here to wit in the Term of of S. M. An. Eliz. 28. and 29. before Ed. Anderson Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench here by the consideration of the same Court had recovered his presentation against Iohn Arch. Bpp. of Canterbury and G. Cornwall his Clerk of the Church of Somerby in the County aforsaid being void and belonging to his gift by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Quare impedit as by the record and proceeding therein in the same Court here remayning it manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet resteth to be don as by the information of the said Thomas the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the said Arch Bpp. and Gabriel that they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. S Tri to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against them ought not to have according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said Thomas by VVilliam Be. his attorny as the same Arch Bpp. and Gabrill by R. P. their attorney And here upon the said Thomas prayeth Execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch. Bpp. and G. to him to be adjudged Saith nothing but the ordinary c. and the same Arch Bishop defenderth the force and wrong when c. and nothing in Bar of the execution of the said Thomas saith whereby the said Thomas remayneth against the said Arch. Bpp. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Thomas have execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch-Bishop according to
the Form of the recovery aforesaid by default c. But let execution therein cease The Incumbent pleads in Bar that the writ of Quare impedit depending the plaintiff was utlawed and that he resigned by which it appertained to the Queen to present and the Queen presented him and that he was indicted such a day and after that the plaintiff sued a writ of Error forth to reverse the utlâ—ry and afterwards it was reversed as to have a writ to the Bishop untill the plea between the said Thomas and the said Gabriel be determined c. and the said Gabriel saith that the said Thomas execution upon the judgment aforesaid against him ought not to have because he saith that the said writ of quare impedit depending to wit such a day and yeare certain C. B. Esquire out of the Court of Chancery of the Lady the Queen at VVestminster in the County of Midd. then being prosecuted a certaine Originall writ of the said Lady the Queen against the same Thomas Beverly c. And recite the outlawry Therefore he by the judgment of W. D. and T. G. then Coroners of the said Lady the Queen of the County aforesaid was utlawed after wich said utlawry against the same Thomas B. in Form aforesaid published remayneth reversed or adnulled and after the said recovery of the presentations aforesaid in the said writ of Scire facias specified to wit the first day of December An. Rn. c. 23. the same Gabriel being then Parson of the Church of Somerby aforesaid at Somerby aforesaid on his owne accord resigned the same Church into the hands of William then Bpp. of Lincoln ordinary of that place whereof the Church aforsaid was then void By pretext whereof the right of the presentation to the same Church being so void by force of the utlawry aforesaid as is before said then being in his strength to the said Lady the Queen belonged the same Lady the Queen to the said Church being so void afterwards to wit the third day of December An. Regni sui 9. by her letters Patents which the said Gabriel with the Great Seale of England Sealed bringeth here into the Court whose date is at Westminster in the County of Midd. the same day and year Presented the same Gabriel her Clerk and the same Gab. by vertue of the presentation afterwards to wit the 5 day of December An. 29. abovesaid was admitted and instituted in the same and afterwards and before the day of the purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit the 16. day of December An. 29. abovesaid the same Gabriel into the Church aforesaid was inducted by pretext whereof the said Church was full and yet is of the same Gab. by the presentation of the said Lady the Queen after which said admission institution induction of the said Gabriel into the Church aforesaid to wit the 13. day of February An. Rn. 29. abovesaid the same Thomas Beverly prosecuted out of the same Court of Chancery aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid then being a certain writ of the said Lady the Qu. De Errore corrigendo to her beloved and faithfull Edm. Anderson Knight directed By which said writ the said Lady the Queen now reciteth by the said Writ that because in the Record and Procedings and also in publishing the said utlawry against the said Thomas in the County of Lincoln aforesaid published and before the same E. A. and his associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as is said retorned manifest error hath intervened to the great Damage of the said Thomas as by his complaint the Queen understood the same Lady the Queen willing the error if any be in due manner to be corrected and to the same Thomas full and speedy Justice may be don in this behalf commanded the said Edmond Anderson that if the utlawry aforesaid before the said Edmond and his associats aforesaid in the bench aforesaid be returned so it was said then the record and processe of the utlawry aforesaid with all things touching them to the said Lady the Queen under your Seale you distinctly and plainly send and that Writ so that we may have them a die Pas in tres Sept. then next following wheresoever we shall be in England that viewing the Record and proceedings aforesaid we have cause further to be don thereupon for correcting the said Error that of right and according to the Law and custom of the Lady the Queen of E. ought to be done by vertue of which writ de err corig the same E. A. the record and proceedings aforesaid whereof mention is made in the said writ of Error Certificat of the utlawry upon the writ of Error to the said Lady the Qu at W. aforesaid at the said tr Sep. Pas under his seal sent according to the form and effect of the said writ the Tenor of which Record and proceedings follow in these words Pleas at W. before E. A. Kr. and his associats Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench of E Term An. of the reign of El. by the grace of God c. 28. rot 1209. Lincoln ss Charles Bawdes Esquire by his attorney offered himself the 4. day against Thomas Baverley c of A plea wherefore with force and armes c. And he came not c. therefore the sheriff was commanded that he attach him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he hath nothing c. therefore let him be taken that he may be here Tli die At which day there came the said Charles by his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said Thomas in the plea aforesaid and he cannot And the sheriff was commanded that he should take him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he is not found c. Therefore as before let him be taken that he be here Tli die ss Pleas at Westminster before c. and recite the entry of the Plu. Capias and the pleas at Westminster c. And recite the entry of the Exigi Fac. At which day the sheriff returned that his county held at Lowth in the county aforesaid the 24. day of Oct. An Regni Eliz. now c. 28. The same Thomas Beverly was the 5. time called and appeared not And that so at the 4. Countys next preceding the same Thomas was likewise called and appeared not and because he appeared not at any of the aforesaid Countyes therefore he is utlawed afterwards to wit on Thursday next after tres Sept. S. Mich. then next following before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster came the same Thomas B in his proper person and rendred himself prisoner to the Marshall of the Marshallsey of the said Lady the Queen before the same Queen by occasion of the utlawly aforesaid who was committed to the Marshall c. Error assigned And presently said that in the record and proceedings aforesaid and also in publishing of the
tâ—e Pl. la non comorâ—ns Travers was Comorant and conversant at N. aforesaid within the Isle of Weight in the said county of Southampton without this that he the same day or at any time afterwards was Comorant and coversant at Grayes Inne in the County of Midd. As by the said Record of emanation of the said writ of Exegint above is supposed and this he is ready to verifie whereupon for that the writ of proclamation was not directed to the sheriff of the said county of South wherein the said P. at the day of the issuing forth of the said writ of Exig was comorant and conversant as of right it ought to have beene directed according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid the same P. prayeth judgment and he from the court here of the utlawry aforesaid may be acquitted discharged and set at large c. ANd the said W. saith that he cannot gainesay but that the allegation of the said P. in his discharge of the utlawry aforesaid is true Confession of the garnishee nor but that the same P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the same P. was utlawed issuing from the court here was commorant conversant at N. c and that no writ of proclamation in this behalfe was directed to the sheriff of the County of S. as the same P. hath above alleaged c. ANd E. Coke Esquire Attorney generall of the said Lady the Qu. who followeth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalfe Confession of the attorney generall upon a testimony thereof consulting if he knew or would say any thing wherefore the said P. ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid of which credable information is given him by W. M. of c. and others faith worthy that the allegation of the said P. in the discharge of the same P. from the utlawry aforesaid is true whereupon the same E giveing credit to them sayeth that he cannot gainesay but truly confesseth Judgment that the utlawry be reversed salvo jure Reginae c. that the said P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the said P. is utlawed issuing out of the court here was commorant and and conversant at N aforesaid c in the county of S. and that no writ of proclamation was ever directed to the said sherff of S. in this behalfe as the said P. hath above alleaged wherefore it is considered that the same P. be discharged of the utlawry aforesaid and upon that occasion not be molested in any thing nor grieved but goe thereof quiet c. reserving a writ to the Lady the Queen otherwise if c. Entry of a speceill writ of Cap. utlagat amerciament of the sheriff for bad attendance upon the court and not coming to receive a speciall Cap. utlagat Recitall of the speciall Utlagat H 2. Jac. Rot. 1362. Broker Cardigan ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but by the oath of honest and lawfull men of your county you should inquire what goods and chattels lands and Tenements M U c. with all his additions hath or had in his Bayliwick such a day and yeare or at any time afterwards which day he was utlawed in the County of the City of the city of O. at the suit of I. S. in a plea of debt whereof he was convicted As the sheriff of the City of Oxon to the Justices of the Lord the Ki. now here at a certaine day now past retorned P. 24 Iac. rot 323. Vict. in mia 5. marks for retorning trade upon a writ that was ent ed upon Record P. 6 H 8 rot 296. the like sur nichil fec nec remisit H. 8 H 6 rot 333 vic in mia 40 l. for not returning of a writ of Nisi prius H 24 Eliz rot 1702. entry of a speciall amerciament for an insufficient retorn upon an Habere fac possessionem emii Recitall of days given to the sheriff to come and receive the writ sin court And that upon their oath he cause them to be extended and appraised according to the true value of them And such things as shall be found by that Inquisition he cause to be taken into the hands of the Lord the King now safely to be kept so that he may answer to the Lord the King of the true value and issues of them and with them so extended and appraised he make knowne to the Justices of the Lord the King here tli retorn distinctly and openly under his seale and the seales of them by whose oath he had made that extent and appraisment And for that the same M. did ly hid wander and runn from place to place in the county aforesaid in contempt of the Lord the King now and prejudice of his Crowne as the King hath been informed That wheresoever it shall happen the same M. to be found in his Baylickwick aswel within as without the liberties he should take him and safely keep so that he might have his body before the Justices here at the said Terme to do and receive whatsoever the said Court of the Lord the King shall consider in that behalf and it is to be known that at the two severall dayes in that same Term given to the said sheriff of Cardigan by the Court here To come here into the Court and receive the Writ aforesaid to be executed in Form of Law the same sheriff came not here into the Court to receive that Writ therefore the same sheriff to wit R. P. Knight in miserec And he is fined by the Justices here to 12 l. c. TRin. 8. Jac. Rot. 2700 Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the Coro of the Lord the Ki of the C. aforesaid that whereas it was testified for the Lord the Ki. in the C. of the said Lord the K. here that divers wits of the said Lord the Ki. by exig of late directed to the sheriff of N. issuing out of the said Court here A special amerciament of the coroners for not certifying of an utlawry after a Cerciorare to them made and before the Iustices here at certain dayes aswell past as to come retornable and many utlawries into the said Court here not as yet certified against the parties Defendants in the same writs named in the county aforesaid published and judgments thereupon are given by the said Coroners And Especially one utlawry against one R. B. late of P. c. in the County of Norff. Gent. at the suite of R. W. in a plea of Debt and because the Lord the King will adhibit due and speedy remedy to the said R. W. in his action aforesaid he doth command the same Coroners that scearching theire Roles and Record and other memorables T. Io 21 23 bayle to an ulawry being in theire custodyes the utlawry aforesaid upon the writ aforesaid
in Forme aforesaid published and the judgment thereupon by the said Coroners given they have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Trin. That the same justices may doe therein what of right and according to the Law and custome of England ought in this behalfe to be done and now here at this day came the same W. H. by W. B. his attorney and because the Coroners of the County aforesaid the writ aforesaid which was otherwise delivered to them to be executed in Form of Law had not here at this day Miserec XL s. Therefore the said Coroners to writ H. T. and I. L. in Miser And are fined by the Iustices here at 40 s. P 12. Jac. Rot. 2243. Goldesbursh Montgomery ss E. P. Esquire sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here in court a certaine writ of Capias utlagat against M. P. at the suite of R. O. Kni. in a plea of Debt retornable before the Justices here Mens Pas that same Term. in mercy c. And is fined by the Iustices aforesaid at 60 s. See Grislyes case Cok. 8. fo 40. B. according to the old book of entryes title record M. 27. H. 7 rot 531. Amerciament det ver at 10 l. for not returning the Habeas Corpus Jur. Devant the Justices de Nisi prius P 13. Jac. rot 733. Brownlow Sar. ss Reversall of an Utlary for insufficient return of a Certiorare It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take H N. of c. utlawed in London on Monday next after the Feast of S. Leonard the Abbot An. regis c. 12. at the suite of Henry Breton in a plea of debt if c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit A dâ—e Pas in 15. dies To do and receive what the court of the King here should consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the said Henry N. in his proper person and the sheriff to wit Rowland Traps Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the said writ to him directed took the body of the said He. N. whose said body he now hath here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon the said Henry N. prayeth the hearing of the writ of Cerciorare whereupon the utlawry aforesaid by Iohn Gore and William Gore then sheriffs of London To the court of the Lord the King here was certified and to him it is read in these words London ss we I. G and W G. sheriffs of London do certifie to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster in the writ to this schedule annexed specifyed that searching the roles records and other memorables being under our custody we find in the same that Henry N. of A. in the County of Sur. Esquire in the writ aforesaid named put in the hustings of London being five times called and not appearing he was utlawed in mannor as followeth That is to say at the hustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall in the City of London upon Monday next after the Feast of c. An. Rs. c. 12. the said Henry N. was the first time called and appeared not and at the bustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall c. on Munday next after the Feast c. An. Sup. the same H. was the second time called and appeared not The answer of H. Iay and T. B. sheriffs That writ as above indorsed was delivered subscirbed to the sheriffs by the said sheriffs at their departure from theire office At the hustings of common pleas held at Guild-hall of the City aforesaid on Munday next before the Feast c. An. Supr the said Henry was the third time called and appeared not At the hustings of the common pleas held c. The said Henry was the fourth time called and appeared not at the husting c. The said Henry was the fift time called and appeared not Therefore he was utlawed The answer of P. P. and M L. sheriffs and this is the utlawry in manner and Forme as it is published against the said Henry Nudigate which we have ready before the Justices at the day and place contayned in the same writ according to the intent of that writ The answer of Iohn Gore and William Gore sheriffs which being read and heard the same H. Nudigate saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid between these words said sheriffs a certaine materiall word is omitted to wit late so that by the omission of the said word it doth not appeare by the returne aforesaid by which sheriffs the said Henry N. was the third fourth and fift time called or by the said sheriffs now or by the said late sheriffs as it ought to appeare by the said retorne For that cause the said returne is insufficient in Law and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry whereupon the said return being seen and by the said Justices here being fully examined and understood It seemed to the Justices here that the allegation of the said H. N. is true in his discharge from the utlawry aforesaid therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said H. N. for that occasion be unmolested not in any thing grieved But goe therein quiet c. Vtlary reversed for variance between the Record and the writ of Exig fac T 7. Jac. rot 3608. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff and so recite the Capias utlagat as in the next before as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. which said Francis being so taken and had prayeth bearing of the writ of Exigent whereupon the same F. at the suite of the said W. in Forme aforesaid is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words James by the Grace of God c. reciting the writ and Test untill you come to and of Scotland the XL. he also prayeth the hearing of the record whereupon that writ Issued And it is read unto him in these words ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Challoner late of c. in the county aforesaid Esquire otherwise called F. C. de L. in the County of Sussex Esquire if c. and safely c. so that he shall have his body c. and so recite the whole entry untill you come to in Forme of Law to be executed c. which being read and heard the said Francis saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that he by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that there is manifest variance between