Lex Parliamentaria OR A TREATISE OF THE LAW and CUSTOM OF PARLIAMENTS Just Published Parliamentary and Political TRACTS written by Sir ROBERT ATKINS Knight of the Bath and late one of the Judges of the Court of Common-Pleas Containing I. THE Power Jurisdiction and Privilege of Parliament and the Antiquity of the House of Commons asserted Occasioned by an Information in the King's-Bench by the Atorney-General against the Speaker of the House of Commons II. An Argument in the great Case concerning Election of Members to Parliament between Sir Samuel Barnardiston Plantiff and Sir William Soame Sheriff of Suffolk Defendant in the Court of King's-Bench in an Action upon the Case and afterwards by Error sued in the Exchequer-Chamber III. An Enquiry into the Power of dispensing with Penal Statutes Together with some Animadversions upon a Book writ by Sir Edward Herbert Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Common-Pleas intitled A short Account of the Authorities in Law upon which Judgment was given in Sir Edward Hale's Case IV. A Discourse concerning the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in the Realm of England V. A Defence of the late Lord Russels's Innocency by way of Answer or Confutation of a Libellous Pamphet intitled An Antidote against Poison with two Letters of the Author of this Book upon the Subject of his Lordship's Tryal VI. The Lord Russel's Innocence further defended by way of Reply to an Answer intitled The Magistracy and Government of England vindicated VII The Lord Cheif Baron Atkins's Speech to Sir William Ashurst Lord Mayor Elect of the City of London at the Time of his being sworn in their Majesties Court of Exchequer Lex Parliamentaria OR A TREATISE OF THE LAW and CUSTOM OF PARLIAMENTS Shewing their Antiquity Names Kinds and Qualities Of the three Estates and of the Dignity and Excellency of Parliaments their Power and Authority Of the Election of Members of the House of Commons in general their Privilege Qualifications and Duties Of the Electors and their Rights Duties and Manner of Elections Of the Returns to Parliament the Sheriff's and other Officers Duty therein Of the Manner of Election of the Speaker and of his Business and Duty Of the Manner of passing Bills and the Orders to be observed in the House of Commons Of Sessions of Parliament as also of Prorogations and Adjournments Together with the proper Laws and Customs of Parliaments With an APPENDIX of a Case in Parliament between Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir John Fortescue for the Knights Place for the County of Bucks 1 Jac. I. The SECOND EDITION with Large Additions LONDON Printed for J. STAGG in Westminster-Hall THE PREFACE IT must be confessed that Lex Parliamentaria or Parliamentary Law cannot be meant or intended to signify any Prescription or Application of Laws to that Power which in itself is boundless and unlimited This Collection therefore only shews what Parliaments have done and not what they may or ought to do The Parliament alone can judge of such Matters as concern their own Rights Authorities or Privileges And yet seeing the Phrase Parliamentary Law or Law of Parliaments has for some Ages past obtained Lord Coke Sir Matth. Hales's c. and that too among Authors of great Name I hope the present or any future Parliament will not censure me for a Word misapplied or for endeavouring to illustrate that Authority which is improperly denominated Parliamentary Law The Parliament itself is no doubt properly to be stiled The fundamental Law and Constitution of this Kingdom as it comprehends all Legal Powers whatsoever But as God and Nature influenced the Voice and Desires of the People to this Form of Government by Parliaments so it must be confessed that the same supream Power also influenced their Voices and Desires to establish this Parliamentary Government for the Safety and Preservation of the Governed and thereby constituted the Salus Populi to be the supream Law to whose Support all other Laws Powers and Authorities ought to tend 'Tis for this End Kings are created and for this End Parliaments assemble that so the Polity and Government of the Nation may be administered with Honour and with Safety for the Good of the whole Community Nor can it be denied but that Parliaments in former Times esteem'd it as their most incumbent temporal Duty to oversee recognize and resirain within the Bounds of Law the Commands and Acts of Kings and to take care that that great and honourable Trust reposed in the Hands of the Prince for the Good of the People might be rightly and duly administered and not perverted or abused to the Invasion of their Rights or the Subversion of the Constitution Brac p. 34 Flet p. 2.17 vide hic p. 89. 'Twas the Sense of this Duty of Parliaments induced both Bracton an eminent Judge under King Henry III. and Fleta a learned Lawyer in King Edward I's Time to record this great Duty of Parliaments to succeeding Ages And from this very Motive it was See the Preface to Privilegia Londini p. 6 7. that our antient Parliaments were so cautious as to oblige our Kings to swear at their Coronations Concedere justas Leges quas vulgus elegerit That they would grant such just Laws as the common People should choose See this Oath admirably well explained in Sadler's Rights of the Kingdom Page 71 88 91. c. From all which and much more that may be added I think it clearly appears That both Kings and Parliaments Lords and Commons and all Laws of Government whatsoever were in their first Intention instituted and ordained for the sole Good and Benefit of the People And where-ever all or any of them are perverted from that View they loose the Nature of their first Intention and ought to receive a contrary Denomination And from the foregoing Particulars I at present apprehend that the Lex Parliamentaria or Fundamental Law of Government in this Nation was not originally founded on any Capitulation or Compact between the King and the People as is usually done in Contracts of Bargains and Sales or other Purchases For that would infer a separate Interest between Prince and People But who will say that a British Monarch can by Law have a distinct Interest from his People Also the mutual Obligation that is established between the Prince and People by the Laws of this Kingdom have laid an unsurmountable Bar against any such Capitulation or contracting Project For by the original and inherent Nature of our Government there is such amutual Relation and political Connection created between the King and his People as in that natural Relation and Connection between the Head and the Members of the Body so that in neither Instance can the Head say to the Members I have no need of you c. This mutual Relation between Prince and People seems to have been interwoven in the fundamental Being and impressed in the very Heart of our Constitution c. The Publisher here thinks fit to declare That this Book has
Body as the Upper House was for their Privileges Customs and Orders which continual and common Usage hath approved of As to their Charge of having used Precipitancy and Rashness they answered That they used it in such a Manner as in all other Cases they were wont to do scilicet To have first a Motion of the Matter in Controversy and then they caused the Clerk of the Crown to bring the second Day the Writs and Returns and they being thrice read they proceed to the Examination of them and upon Examination gave Judgment which was the true proper Course of the Place As to the House's not having used the King well the Thing being done by his Command they say That they had no Notice before their Sentence that the King himself took any special Regard of that Case but only that his Officer the Chancellor had directed his second Writ as formerly had been done As to the Matter of the Outlawry they said That they understand by his Royal Person more Strength and Light of Reason from it than ever before and yet it was without Example That any Member of the House was put out of the House for any such Cause but to prevent that they had prepared a Law That no outlawed Person for the Time to come should be of the Parliament nor any Person in Execution should have the Privilege of Parliament But they said further That Sir Francis Goodwyn was not outlawed at the Day of his Election for he was not Quinto Exactus the five Proclamations never had been made which Proclamations they in London always spare except the Party or any for him require it and that Exigent was never returned nor any Writ of Certiorari directed to the Coroners to certify it but after his Election which was a Thing unusual the Money being paid and the Sheriffs being long since dead to disenable the said Goodwyn to serve in Parliament that the Exigent was returned and the Names of the deceased Sheriffs put thereto Et ex hoc fuit without doubt that Goodwyn could not have a Scire Facias for there was no Outlawry against him and by Consequence the Pardons had discharged him And they farther shewed to the King That if the Chancellor only could examine Returns then upon every Surmise whether it were true or false the Chancellor might send a second Writ and cause a new Election to be made and thus the free Election of the County should be abrogated which would be too dangerous to the Commonwealth For by such Means the King and his Council might make any Man whom they would to be of the Parliament-House against the Great Charter and the Liberties of England It is found among the Precedents of Queen Elizabeth's Reign Rush 3 vol. pag. 591. on whose Times all good Men look with Reverence that She committed one Wentworth a Member of the House of Commons to the Tower sitting the House only for proposing That they might advise the Queen in a Matter which she thought they had nothing to do to meddle in Quere If not in advising her to marry This notorious Infringement of their Liberties and Privileges See Sir Matthew Hâ—â—'s of Parliament pag. 206 216 217.218 c. in the latter End of Queen Elizabeth seems to be what the Commons complained of and mention in that famed Remonstrance or Declaration of their Privileges printed and directed to King James the First in the Beginning of his Reign viz. Anno Dom. 1604. Wherein they tell that King That they bore with some Things in the latter Times of Queen Elizabeth in regard of her Sex and her Age and not to impeach his Majesty's Succession under whom they then hoped to have them redressed and rectified Whereas on the contrary in that very first Parliament of his Majesty they found That the whole Freedom of the Parliament and Realm had been on all Occasions mainly hewed at As That the Freedom of their Persons in Election had been impeached The Freedom of their Speech prejudiced by often open Reproofs That particular Persons Members who had spoken their Consciences in Matters proposed to the House noted with Disgrace c. That a Goaler had contemned the Decrees and Orders of the House Some of the higher Clergy to write Books against them even fitting in Parliament The inferior Clergy to inveigh against them in their Pulpits c. After which they roundly assert That the Prerogative of Princes may easily See the Force of a Precedent once fixed in the Crown 2 Inst 61. Houâ—â—shead 1 Tom. pag 135. and do daily grow and increase But the Privileges of Subjects are for the most Part at an everlasting Stand They may by good Providence and Care be preserved but being once lost are not to be recovered but with much Disquiet and Disorder Vide ibid. plura To conclude this Treatise as I begun it give me leave to add There is nothing ought to be so dear to the Commons of Great Britain as a Free Parliament that is a House of Commons every Way free and independent either of the Lords or Ministry or c. Free in their Persons Free in their Estates Free in their Elections Free in their Returns Free in their assembling Free in their Speechs Debates and Determinations Free to complain of Offenders Free in their Prosecutions for Offences and therein Free from the Fear or Influence of others how great soever Free to guard against the Incroachments of arbitrary Power Free to preserve the Liberties and Properties of the Subject and yet Free to part with a Share of those Properties when necessary for the Service of the Publick Nor can he be justly esteem'd a Representative of the People of Britain who does not sincerely endeavour to defend their just Rights and Liberties against all Invasions whatsoever See further touching the Rights and Duties of Parliaments in Rapin's History Vol. II. Book XXII especially Page 583 and 595. Sed quae sunt Jura si non Libere Fruantur FINIS Books lately Printed MODERN Entries in English Being a select Collection of Pleadings in the Courts of King's-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer viz. Declarations Pleas in Abatement and in Bar Replications Rejoinders c. Demurrers Issues Verdicts Judgments Forms of Continuances Discontinuances and other Entries and of entering Judgments c. in all personal Actions and also all Kinds of Writs Original and Judicial Translated from the most authentick Books but cheifly from Lutwich's Saunders's Ventris's Salkeld's and the Modern Reports and from other Cases lately try'd and adjudg'd and wherein Writs of Error have been brought and Judgments affirm'd Together with Readings and Observations on the several Cases in the Reports as well relating to the Precedents herein as to all other Cases incident to each particular Title and the same abridg'd in a methodical Order To which are added References to all the other Entries in the Books with three distinct Tables one of the Precedents the second of the Cases abridg'd and the third of the Names of the Cases By a Gentlman of the Inner-Temple The Law of Uses and Trusts collected and digested in a proper Order from the Reports of adjudged Cases in the Courts of Law and Equity and other Books of Authority Together with a Treatise of Dower To which is added A compleat Table of all the Matters therein contained And The Law and Practice of Ejectments Being a compendious Treatise of the Common and Statute Law relating thereto To which is added Select Precedents of Pleas special Verdicts Judgments Executions and Proceedings in Error with two distinct Tables to the Whole The Second Edition carefully corrected and revised by the Author The Attorney's Pocket Companion Or A Guide to the Practisers of the Law In two Parts Being a Translation of Law Proceedings in the Courts of King's-Bench and Common-Pleas Containing a Collection of the common Forms beginning with the Original and ending with the Judicial Process Together with an historical as well as practical Treatise on Ejectment To which is also added The Law and Practise of Fines and Recoveies and several other Precedents with some Remarks on the Forms of the Habeas Corpora and Jurata now in Use In two Vols
c. 6 7. the Lords may proceed in Judgment against the Delinquents of what Degree soever and of what Nature soever the Offence be For where the Commons complain the Lords do not assume to themselves Trial at Common Law Q. Neither do the Lords at the Trial of a Common Impeachment by the Commons decedere de Jure suo for the Commons are then instead of a Jury and the Parties Answer and Examination of Witnesses are to be in their Presence Post 120. or they to have Copies thereof and the Judgment is not to be given but upon their Demand which is instead of a Verdict so the Lords do only judge not try the Delinquent 28 Hen. 6. Id. 98. Tho' the Lords refused to commit the Duke of Suffolk upon the Commons complaint of him of a common Fame of Treason yet when they accused him of a particular Treason he was Committed and brought Prisoner to his Answer But in Cases of Misdemeanors it is otherwise Then the Party accused whether Lord or Commoner answers as a Freeman viz. The Lord within his Place Ibid. the Commoner at the Bar and they are not committed till Judgment unless upon the Answer of a Commoner the Lords find Cause to commit him till he find Sureties to attend c. lest he should fly Prout Jo. Cavendish upon the Lord Chancellor's demand of Justice against him for his false Accusation was Committed after his Answer until he put in Bail Anno 7 Rich. 2. and before Judgment In Cases of Misdemeanors only Id. 105. the Party accused was never deny'd Counsel If the Commons do only complain Id. 163. and do neither impeach the Party in Writing nor by Word of Mouth in open House nor demand Trial to be in their Presence Post 120. in these Cases it is in the Election of the Lords whether the Commons shall be present or not In Complaints of Extortion Id. 173. and Oppression the Lords awarded Satisfaction to the Parties wronged which sometime was certain sometime general but alway secundum non ultra Legem It appeareth plainly by many Precedents Id. 176 177. that all Judgments for Life and Death are to be render'd by the Steward of England or by the Steward of the King's House and this is the Reason why at every Parliament the King makes a Lord Steward of his House tho' he hath none out of Parliament And at such Arraignment the Steward is to sit in the Chancellor's Place and all Judgments for Misdemeanors are by the Chancellor or by him who supplies the Chancellor's Place In Case of Recovery of Damages Id. 187. or Restitution the Parties are to have their Remedy the Parliament being ended in the Chancery and not in any other inferior Court at the Common Law But the Lords in Parliament may direct how it shall be levied The Judges who are but Assistants to the Upper House have leave from the Lord Chancellor or Keeper Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 527. Col. 2. to sit cover'd in the House but are alway uncover'd at a Committee 3. Car. 1. Petyt's Msscel Parliam 212 213. The Sentence of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal pronounced by the Lord Keeper against Ensign Henry Reynde for ignominious Speeches uttered by him against the Lord Say and Seal and for his Contempt of the High Court of Parliament was thus 1. That he never bear Arms hereafter but be accounted unworthy to be a Soldier 2. To be imprisoned during Pleasure 3. To stand under the Pillory with Papers on his Head shewing his Offence at Cheapside London or at Banbury 4. To be fined at 200 l. to the King 5. To ask Forgiveness here of all the Lords of Parliament in general and of the Lord Say and his Son in Particular both here and at Banbury And the Court of Star-Chamber ordered by the Lords to put the said Sentence in Execution out of Time of Parliament Id. 213. Vide a Sentence pronounced by the Lords Die Martis 26. Julij 1642. against one John Escot of Launceston in the County of Cornwall for speaking Scandalously of the Parliament in Rush Col. Vol. 1. f. 759 760. And likewise against John Marston Clerk Rector of St. Mary Magdalen in the City of Canterbury ibid. See divers particulars touching the Power and Jurisdiction of the House of Lords in Prynn's Plea for the House of Lords c. as also a Book printed Anno 1669. Entitled The Grand Question concerning the Judicature of the House of Peers Stated c. See also Sir M. Hales of Parliaments Pa. 138 139. and ibid 140 c. where Attendants on the upper House may be Members of the House of Commons Q. CHAP. VI. House of Commons THE House of Commons was originally Sir R. Atkyns Argument c. p. 13. and from the first Constitution of the Nation the Representative of one of the three Estates of the Realm and a part of the Parliament It is assirmed by Mr. Lambard Lambard's Archeion 257 258. that Burgesses were chosen to the Parliament before the Conquest The antient Towns call'd Boroughs Littleton Sect. 164. are the most antient Towns that are in England for the Towns that now are Cities or Counties in old Time were Boroughs and call'd Boroughs for that of such old Towns came the Burgesses to the Parliaments Knights of the Shire to serve in Parliament Sir Rob. Atkyn's 18. and the paying Wages to them for their Service has been Time out of Mind and did not begin 49 Hen. 3. for that is within Time of Memory in a Legal Sense The House of Commons Id. 34. as a Member of the High Court of Parliament have been as antient as the Nation itself and may in the Sense of Julius Caesar be accounted among the Aborigines and that they have had a perpetual Being to speak in the Language of the Law a Tempore cujus Contraria memoria Hominum non existit and that they are therefore capable by Law together with the rest of the three Estates in Parliament to prescribe and claim a share in all Parliamentary Powers and Priviledges I do not mean seperately but in conjunction with those other Estates which they could not otherwise legally have done if their Original and Commencement could have been shewn During the British Saxon Petyt's Preface to the antient Rights of the Commons c. p. 3. and Norman Governments the Freemen or Commons of England as now call'd and distinguish'd from the great Lords were pars essentialis constituens an essential and constitutent part of the Wittena Gemot Commune Concilium Baronagium Angliae or Parliament in those Ages It is apparent Id. 12. and past all Contradiction that the Commons in the Times of the Britons Vid. Ch. 1 ante Saxons and Picts were an essential Part of the Legislative Power in making and ordaining Laws by which themselves and their Posterity were to be Govern'd and that the Law was then the golden Metwand and Rule which Measured out and allowed the Prerogative of the Prince and
by him commenced he shall not be barred by any Statute of Limitation nor non-suited dismist or his Suit discontinued for want of Prosecution but shall from Time to Time on the rising of the Parliament be at Liberty to proceed to Judgment and Execution Sect. IV. That no Action Suit Process Order Judgment Decree or Proceedings in Law or Equity against the King's original and immediate Debtor for Recovery or obtaining of any Debt or Duty originally and immediately due or payable to his Majesty his Heirs or Successors or against any Accomptant or Person answerable or liable to render an Account to his Majesty his Heirs or Successors for any Part or Branch of their Revenues or other original and immediate Debt or Duty or the Execution of any such Process Order Judgment Decree or Proceedings shall be impeached stayed or delayed by or under the Colour or Pretence of Parliament Yet so that that the Person of any such Debtor or Accomptant or Person answerable or liable to account being a Peer of this Realm or Lord of Parliament shall not be liable to be arrested or imprisoned by or upon any such Suit Process Order Judgment c. or being a Member of the House of Parliament shall not during the Continuance of the Privilege of Parliament be arrested or imprisoned by or upon any such Order Judgment Decree Process or Proceedings Sect. V. Provided That this Act or any Thing therein shall not extend to give any Jurisdiction Power or Authority to any Court to hold Plea in any real or mixed Action in any other Manner than it might have been done before the making of this Act. Jovis Bohun's Collection pag. 27. 13 Feb. 1700. Resolved That no Member have any Privilege in any Case where he is only a Trustee Resolved Nem. Cont. That no Peer of the Realm hath any Right to vote in the Election of any Member to serve in Parliament And Declared by the House as a standing Order Ibid. That no Member have any Privilege except for his Person only against any Commoner in any Suit or Proceeding at Law or Equity for any longer Time than the House shall be actually sitting for the Dispatch of Business in Parliament Martii Ibid. pag. 230. 28 Nov. 1699. Resolved That no Member of this House acting as a Publick Officer hath any Privilege of Parliament touching any Matter done in Execution of his Office APPENDIX The Report of a Case happening in Parliament in the first Year of King James the First which was the Case of Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir John Fortescue for the Knights Place in Parliament for the County of Bucks Translated out of the French IN this Case after that Sir Francis Goodwyn was elected Knight with one Sir William Fleetwood for the said County which Election was freely made for him in the County and Sir John Fortescue refused notwithstanding that the Gentlemen of the best Rank put him up the said Sir John Fortescue complained to the King and Council-Table he being one of them to wit one of the Privy Council that he had been injuriously dealt with in that Election which does not appear to be true But to exclude Sir Francis Goodwyn from being one of the Parliament it was objected against him That he was Outlawed in Debt which was true scilicet he was outlawed for sixty Pound the 31st of Queen Elizabeth at the Suit of one Johnson which Debt was paid and also the 39th of Eliz. at the Suit of one Hacker for sixtteen Pounds which Debt was also paid and that notwithstanding this the King by the Advice of his Council at Law and by the Advice of his Judges took Cognisance of these Outlawries and directed another Writ to the Sheriff of the said County to elect another Knight in the Place of the said Sir Francis Goodwyn which Writ bore Date before the Return of the former And this Writ recites N. B. Here the King assumes the Power of judging and determining the 〈◊〉 of Members Parliament Sed 〈◊〉 That because the said Sir Francis was outlawed prout Domino Regi constabat de Recordo and for other good Considerations which were well cognisant to the King and because he was Inidonious for the Business of the Parliament therefore the King commanded the Sheriff to elect one other Knight in his Room which Writ was executed accordingly and Sir John Fortescue elected And at last Day of the Return to wit the first Day of the Parliament both Writs were return'd the first with the Indenture sealed between the Sheriff and the Freeholders of Bucks in which Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir William Fleetwood were elected Knights for the Parliament and also the Sheriff returned upon the Dorse of the Writ That the said Sir Francis was outlawed in two several Outlawries and therefore was not a meet Person to be a Member of the Parliament House The second Writ was returned with an Indenture only in which it was recited That Sir John Fortescue by reason of the second Writ was elected Knight Both these Returns were brought the third Sitting of the Parliament to the Parliament House by Sir George Copping being Clerk of the Crown And after that the Writs and Returns of them were read it was debated in Parliament Whether Sir Francis Goodwyn should be received as Knight for the Parliament or Sir John Fortescue And the Court of Parliament after a long Debate thereupon gave Judgment That Sir Francis Goodwyn should be received And their Reasons were these First because they took the Law to be That an Outlawry in Personal Actions was no Cause to disable any Person from being a Member of Parliament and it was said That this was ruled in Parliament 35th of Queen Elizabeth in the Parliament House in a Case for one Fitz-Herbert Another Precedent was 39 H. 6. Secondly The Pardons of the 39th of Queen Eliz. and 43 Eliz. had pardoned those Outlawries and therefore as they said he was a Man able against all the World but against the Party Creditor and against him he was not But in this Case the Parties were paid Also Thirdly it was said That Sir Francis Goodwyn was not legally outlawed because no Proclamation was issued forth to the County of Bucks where he was Commorant and Resiant And therefore the Outlawry being in the Hustings in London and Sir Francis Goodwyn being Comorant in Bucks the Outlawry no Proclamation issuing to the County of Bucks was void by the Statute of the 31st of the Queen which in such Cases makes the Outlawries void Fourthly It was said that the Outlawries were 1. Against Francis Goodwyn Esq 2. Against Francis Goodwyn Gent. And 3. The Return was of Francis Goodwyn Knight Et quomodo constant that those Outlawries were against the said Sir Francis Goodwyn For these Reasons also they resolved That the Outlawries were not any Matter against Sir Francis Goodwyn to disenable him to be a Knight for the County of Bucks Fifthly It was said That by the Statute
Custom of Parliament and therefore void The Authority of the High Court of Parliament to be committed to a few as in 21 Rich. 2. c. 16. Ibid. is holden to be against the Dignity of a Parliament and that no such Commission ought to be granted Tho' it be apparent what transcendent Power and Authority the Parliament hath Id. 43 and tho' divers Parliaments have attempted to bar restrain suspend qualify or make void the Power of subsequent Parliaments yet could they never effect it for the latter Parliament hath ever Power to abrogate suspend qualify explain or make void the former in the Whole or in any Part thereof notwithstanding any Words of Restraint Prohibition or Penalty in the former For it is a Maxim in the Law of Parliament Quod Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant An Act of Parliament doth include every Man's Consent Hobart 256. as well to come and unborn Persons as those present The Sovereign Power of this High Court of Parliament is such Hakewel 86. that altho' the King's Majesty hath many great Priviledges and Prerogatives yet many Things are not effectual in Law to pass under the great Seal by the King's Charter without the consent of Parliament as was resolv'd by all the Judges in the Princes case The King by his Letters Patents may make a Denizen Id. 87. Bro. Denizen N o 9. 36. H. 8. but cannot Naturalize him to all purposes as an Act of Parliament may do If a Man be Attainted of Felony Hakewel 89. or Treason by Verdict Outlawry Confession c. his Blood is corrupted which is a perpetual and absolute Disability for him or his Posterity to claim any Hereditament in Fee-simple either as Heir to him or any Ancestor paramount him and he shall not be restored to his Blood without Parliament And yet the King may give to any attainted Person his Life by this Charter of Parliament The King cannot alter the Common Law Id. 90. or the general Customs of the Realm as Gavelkind Borough-English or the like without consent of Parliament Altho' a King have a Kingdom by Discent Ibid. yet seeing by the Law of that Kingdom he doth inherit that Kingdom he cannot change those Laws of himself without Consent of Parliament By the Laws of this Kingdom Ibid. the King cannot by his Proclamation alter the Law but the King may make Proclamtion that he shall incur the Indignation of his Majesty that withstands it But the Penalty of not obeying his Proclamation may not be upon Forfeiture of his Goods his Lands or his Life without Parliament Le Parliament d'Engleterre ne lia Ireland quoad Terras suas Brook 123. 91. Vide 20 H. 6.9 Crompton 22. b. quar ils ont Parliament la mes il poient eux lier quant al Choses transitory come eskipper de Lane ou Merchandize al intent de ceo carrier al auter Lieu ultra Mare The Parliament of England cannot bind Ireland Quere infra as to their Lands for they have a Parliament there but they may bind them as to Things transitory as the shipping of Wool or Merchandize to the intent to carry it to another Place beyond the Sea 4 Inst 350. Sometimes the King of England call'd his Nobles of Ireland to come to his Parliament of England c. And by special Words the Parliament of England may bind the Subjects of Ireland The Lords in their House have Power of Judicature Id. 23. and the Commons in their House have Power of Judicature and both Houses together have Power of Judicature This Power is best understood by reading the Judgments and Records of Parliament at large Ibid. and the Journals of the House of Lords and 6 H. 8. c. 16. Rast 429 430. Vaughan 285. the Book of the Clerk of the House of Commons which is sometimes also styled a Record If Inconveniencies necessarily follow out of the Law only the Parliament can cure them If a Marriage be declared by Act of Parliament to be against God's Law Id. 327. we must admit it to be so for by a Law that is by an Act of Parliament it is so declared In many Cases Multitudes are bound by Acts of Parliament Id. 14. which are not Parties to the Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses as all they that have no Free-hold or have Free-hold in ancient Demesne and all Women having Free-hold or no Free-hold and Men within the Age of One and twenty Years Hob. 256. c. and we may add Persons unborn It is declared by the Lords and Commons in full Parliament upon Demand made of them on the Behalf of the King That they could not assent to any Thing in Parliament that tended to the disherison of the King and his Crown whereunto they were sworn The Expounding of the Laws doth ordinarily belong to the Reverend Judges Hakewel 94. and in Case of greatest Difficulty or Importence to the High Court of Parliament Errors by the Law in the Common-Pleas are to be corrected in the King's-Bench 4 Inst 22. Vid. Stat. 1 Jac. 1 c. 1. and of the King's-Bench in the Parliament and not otherwise i. e. where the Proceedings are by original Writ Instit Leg. 171.172 For if they are by Bill they may be corrected in the Exchequer Chamber by St. 27 Eliz. c. 8. from whence a Writ of Error lyes to the Parliament Actions at Common Law are not determined in this High Court of Parliament Selden's Judicature 2. yet Complaints have ever been receiv'd in Parliaments as well of private Wrongs as publick Offences And according to the Quality of the Person and Nature of the Offence they have been retained or referred to the Common Law There be divers Precedents of the Trial of Bishops by their Peers in Parliament Id. 4.5 as well for Capital Offences as Misdemeanors whereof they have been accused in Parliament And so there have been of Commoners As the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury 15 Ed. 3. n. 6 7 8. ibid. postea 44. 39. ibid 17 E. 3.22 And the Bishop of Norwich 7 Ric. 2. for Misdemeanors So were the Bishops of York and Chichester tried for Treason by their Peers in Parliament upon the Appeal of the Lords Appellants 11 R. 2. And Anno 21 R. 2. The Commons Accused the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury of Treason by their Peers in Parliament upon the Appeal of the Lords Appellants 11 R. 2. And Anno 21 R. 2. The Commons accused the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury of Treason and the Temporal Lords judged him a Traitor and banished him But if a Bishop be accused out of Parliament he is to be tried by an ordinary Jury of Free-holders for his Honour is not inheritable as is the Temporal Peers out of Parliament yet in all other Matters save that only of their Trial they have Priviledge as no Day of Grace to be granted against them in any Suit A Knight to be returned upon the Pannel where a Bishop is Party and no Process in a Civil Action to be awarded
against his Body and the like And by this it appeareth what Persons are de Jure triable by the Lords in Parliament viz. their Peers only which Bishops are not Judgments in Parliaments for Death have generally been strictly guided per Legem Terrae i.e. Lex Parliamenti d. 168. The Parliament hath three Powers Sir Rob. Atkyns Argument c. 36. a Legislative in Respect of which they are call'd the three Estates of the Realm a Judicial in respect of this it is call'd Magna Curia or the High Court of Parliament a Counselling Power hence it is call'd Commune Concilium Regni The Parliament gives Law to the Court of King's-Bench Id. 49. and to all other Courts of the Kingdom and therefore it is absurd and preposterous that it shou'd receive Law from it and be subject to it The greater is not judged of the less All the Courts of Common Law are guided by the Rule of the Common Law Id. 50 but the Proceedings of Parliament are by quite another Rule The Matters in Parliament are to be discussed and determined by the Custom and Usage of Parliament and the Course of Parliament and neither by the Civil nor the Common Law used in other Courts Ibid. The Judges of all the Courts of Common Law in Westminster are but Assistants and Attendants to the High Court of Parliament And shall the Assistants judge of their Superiors The High Court of Parliament is the dernier Refort Ibid. and this is generally affirm'd and held but it is not the last if what they do may yet again be examin'd and controlled Because the High Court of Parliament proceeds by a Law peculiar to that High Court Id 52. which is call'd Lex Consuetudo Parliamenti and not by the Rules of the Common Law and consists in the Customs Usages and Course of Parliament no Inferior Court can for this very Reason judge or determine of what is done in Parliament or by the Parliament A Statute Arc. Parl. 85. or Act of Parliament need not be proclaim'd for the Parliament represents the Body of the whole Realm for there are Knights and Burgesses of every County and Town But otherwise where it is ordained by the Act that it shall be proclaimed A Man Attainted of Felony Id. 100. or Treason shall not be restored in Blood without Parliament 28 Ed. 1. Petyt's Appendix to Miscel Parliam n. 38. A Truce being concluded between the English and French by King Edward's Ambassadors who therein had dishonourably agreed to include the Scots the Ambassadors at the ensuing Parliament were sharply rebuked and corrected not only by the King himself the Prelates and Nobles but by the Commons The Court of Parliament was the Sanctuary Turner's Case of Bankers 36. whether the distressed Subject in his Exigence fled for Shelter and Refuge and alway found it Into the Sacred Bosom of Parliaments it was Ibid Vide Several Precedent and Records that they poured out their Sighs and Groans with constant Success and when in Cases of high Nature the Common Law was arrested and stopt in her proceedings Parliaments evermore ran into ther Rescue and in dutiful ways discharged those Locks and Bars which had been unjustly fastned on the Exchequer The Right of the Crown of England Stat. Prov. 25 Ed. 3. Rast Stat. 99. and the Law of the said Realm is such that upon the Mischiefs and Damages which happen to the Realm the King ought and is bound by his Oath of the Accord of his People in Parliament thereof to make Remedy c. To conclude this Chapter Le Parliament ad Absolute poiar en touts Cases come a faire Leys d'adjuger Matters en Ley a trier vie del home a reverser Errors en Bank le Roy especialment lou est ascun Commune Mischief que l'ordinary Course del Ley n'ad ascun means a remedier en tiel Case ceo est le proper Court Et tonts choses que ils font sont come Judgments Et si le Parliament mesme erre Finche's Nomotecnia l. 2. c. 1. f. 21. 22. come il poet ceo ne poet estre reverse en ascun Lieu forsque en le Parliament Which because it is omitted as several other things are in the Book translated into English I will thus give it the Reader that does not understand French The Parliament hath Absolute Power in all Cases as to make Laws to adjudge Matters in Law to try Men upon their Lives to reverse Errors in the King's Bench especially where there is any Common Mischief which the ordinary Course of the Law hath not any means to remedy in such Case this is the proper Court And all things which they do are as Judgments And if the Parliament it self errs as it may that cannot be reversed in any place but in Parliament Sir Robert Cotton See Sir Robert Cot. Treatise of Parliaments p. 44 45 c in his Discourse of the Privilege and Practice of Parliaments says thus by Parliaments all the wholesom Fundamental Laws of this Land were and are Establish'd and Confirmed By Act of Parliament the Pope's Power and Supremacy in this Kingdom and the Romish Superstition and Idolatry were abrogated and abolished By Act of Parliament God's true Religion Worship and Service are or may be establish'd and maintain'd By Act of Parliament the two Universities of Oxford and Cambridge with other Cities and Towns have had many Privileges and Immunities granted em By Parliament one Pierce Gaveston a great Favourite and Misleader of King Ed. 2. was remov'd and Banished and afterwards by the Lords Executed Also by Parliament the Spencer's Favourites and Misguiders of the same King were Condemned c. and so was Delapool in H. 6. Time and others since By Parliament Empson and Dudley two notable Polers of the Common-wealth by exacting Penal Laws on the Subjects were Discover'd and afterwards Executed By Parliament the Damnable Gunpowder Treason hatch'd in Hell is recorded to be had in Eternal Infamy By Parliament one Sir Giles Mompesson a Caterpiller and Poler of the Common-wealth by exacting upon In-holders c. was discover'd degraded and Banished by Proclamation By Parliament Sir Francis Bacon Note the Censure on the late E. of Macclesfield Quere made by K. James 1. Baron of Verulam Viscount of St. Albans and Lord Chancellor of England was for Bribery c. discover'd and displac'd By Parliament Sir John Bennet one of the Judges of the Prerogative Court being Pernitious to the Common-wealth in his Place was discover'd and displac'd By Parliament Lyonel Cranfield sometime a Merchant of London and made by K. James 1. Earl of Middlesex and Lord Treasurer of England being hurfull in his Place to the Common-wealth was discover'd and displaced By Parliament Note Sir Francis Mitchell a jolly Middlesex Justice of Peace in the Suburbs of London another Canker-worm of the Common-wealth by Corruption in exacting an Execution of the Laws upon poor Alchouse-keepers Victuallers c. was discover'd and degraded from his Knighthood and