demand in the Writ specified be under 20. pounds are by the Rules and Custom of the Court of Common Pleas not to be insisted upon or if above not at all in the Case of Defendants being Executors or Administrators and if the Defendant for want of Bail for his appearance do continue in Prison three terms and no habeas Corpus be brought or declaration given or further prosecution made he is to be delivered by a Writ of Supersedeas made of course upon the apparance to the action only without any special Bail put in before a Judge or Bond given to the Sheriff and where special Bail is very seldom given it is but that if Judgment be obtained against the Defendant he shall render his body to Prison or satisfie the condemnation Our Writs of Arrest ad respondendum being ad Cautionem custodiam non ad poenam but to enforce a gage or pledge or to detain or put a Debtor or Defendant into the Custody of the Law to the end he may give Bail Judicatum solvere to abide the Judgment of the Court or if no Bail be required to appear to the Action And the Proces of Utlary which although they were not ordinarily used in Actions of debt before the making of the Statute of 25 E. 3. was notwithstanding in cases of trespas for breach of the Peace and for Contumacy and Contempts in not appearing warranted by the Laws of King Edgar Canutus Edward the Confessor and the practise of our Saxon Ancestors borrowed and deduced from the Ancient Customs of other Nations is not now so dreadful as it was in former Ages when as Bracton and Stamford do agree the Partie outlawed did forfeit Patriam Amicos omnia terras tenementa bona Catalla sua all that he could entitle himself unto was out of the protection of the King and his Laws and could not bring any action until he had rendered himself to Prison obtained his Charter of Pardon brought his Writ of Error and given Bail to answer the Action but may now without Bail unless specially required be admitted to reverse the Utlary before Judgment upon defect of Proclamation only or some small Error without a Writ of Error or the Record certified into the Court of Kings Bench or Errors assigned with other the many troubles and charges which that way produced The Plaintifs for fear of obstructing or narrowing the wayes of Justice are not put as they were anciently to find real Sureties to prosecute and make good their actions or to pay a Fine to the King if they do not as our Laws do intend they should or to make Oath of their debts or de non calumniando that the Action is not prosecuted in malice or upon sinister ends as the Civil Law enjoyned And the Statute of Westminster the second doth in Writs of Execution against the Goods and Chattels of a Defendant except Boves Affros de Caruca sua Oxen and Horses of Husbandry and the Writ imports as much in the tenor of it the Judges do without any Inquisition or proof that there were not other goods sufficient to satisfie the Execution permit for the Creditors more speedy attaining to his satisfaction all the goods to be taken in Execution which in more Ancient times was so unusual as a Defendant hath brought his Action against the Sheriff and the Plaintif for taking them in Execution when there was other personal Estate sufficient And do also suffer the Plaintiff to prosecute the Sureties upon a Bond when the Principal hath not been sued and was sufficient to pay the Debt or dammage which by the former course and practise of the Law was not allowed And our Writs of Exigent and Outlary were truly and properly only to be made use of where the Defendant refuseth to appear in contempt of a Court of Justice and the Proces thereof is fugitive or incertain where to be found taken or arrested hath no visible or certain Estate or lurketh in some Liberty of which there are many in England and Wales where the Kings ordinary Writs and Proces do not run or have any power or force and a Capias utlegatum carrieth with it in the same Writ a Non omittas propter aliquam libertatem and impowereth the Sheriff to enter into any Liberty and arrest the Defendant and by a special Capias utlegatum to seize and take at the same time all the Defendants Lands Goods Chattels and Estate into the Kings hands as forfeited for his Contempt and that seisure transferred into the Court of Exchequer bringeth the Plaintif an advantage to take a Lease of the King of the Lands so seised at a very low rent until the Defendant purge himself of the Contempt reverse the Outlary give Bail and appear unto the Action which being so consonant to the Outlawries Bannes and proscriptions of Germany and other Nations Kings and Princes in the like Cases to preserve their own Authority in that of their Courts of Justice and requiring some severity and a more then ordinary Proces hath been all the means which without force and violence and a greater disturbance of the People our Laws and a long Custom and usage of time have hitherto prescribed can contrive to bring unwilling Men to Judgment CHAP. VI. The delayes and inconveniences of the Proces of Summons Pone and Distringas were a great if not the only cause of the disuse thereof FOr the way and Course of Summons Pone and Distringas so much in use before that Statute of 25 E. 3. was unto Plaintifs as full of delayes as they were of increase of Charges and trouble which a view of the old Records of the Court of Common-Pleas before the making of that Statute by the many Writs of Alias and Pluries Distringas with issues forfeited and returned upon them occasioning a great proâ—it to the King and less to the Subjects and the many Writs of testatum Distringas made into other Countries where the Plaintifs averred that the Defendants had Lands and Estate suffiâ—ient and Writs of Averment and Enquiry made out upon too small issues returned directed unto the Justices of Assize to certifie if there might not be more issues returned and such a Writ of Enquiry to be executed in the Lent or Summer Vacations could not but cause a more long chargeable and troublesome delay to get better issues to be returned may help to attest the more necessary and better use of the Proces of Capias and Arrest and that Writs of Exigent and Outlawry will in the Cases aforesaid propter inevitabilem necessitatem be everlastingly necessary especially when in the same Parliament of 25 E 3. wherein Proces of Outlawry in Actions of Debt were granted a great complaint was made that the Steward and Marshal of the Kings House or their Deputies did upon Actions attach and distrain men by ten Marks of their Goods one day and by as much the next
their wisdom could foresee and provide indifferently devised for all men Sed quia plus pollere multorum ingenia consiliaque in animis versarent secum unamquamque rem agitarent deinde sermonibus at que in medium quid in quaque re plus minusve esset conferrent eas leges habiturum populum Romanum quas consensus omnium invasisse nec jussisse latas magis quam tulisse videri posset But for as much as the wits and heads of many men might see further and better advise they gave them leave to consider and ponder every particular and to reason together from point to point and deliver their opinions openly what was short wanting or superfluous in every Article and what Laws an universal consent of the people should bring in those should be enacted and none other that it might appear they were not so much to approve of them give their assent after they were propounded as to propose prefer them their own selves Cumque ad rumores hominum de unoquoque legum capite edito satis correctae viderentur Centuriatis Comitiis decem Tabularum leges perlatae sunt qui nunc quoque in hoc immenso aliarum super alias acervatarum legum cumulo fons omnis publici privatique est Juris And when as they were thought to be sufficiently corrected as every one spake to the Titles and Chapters thereof in an Assembly of all the Centuries and degrees of men the Laws of the Ten Tables were enacted and established which even at this day saith Livy amongst that infinite number of Laws heaped one upon another are the very Well-spring and Fountain of all Justice both publick and private But the next year after the people finding the Decem viri growing insolent to determine matters at home before they gave Sentence openly and usurping Kingly Government begun to repent themselves of putting the power of appeal out of themselves tumult and protested against the Decem viri or Ten which they had chosen saying They had created them Magistrates only for the publishing and enacting of certain Laws but they had now no Justice in the City And Appius one of the Ten having ingrossed into his hands the power and disposing of his Partners helps on the Tumult by a business that happened upon his lusting after a young Maid the Daughter of L. Virginius a Commander of good note in the Army and setting Mr. Claudius to claim her as his Bond-woman who laying hands on her in the Market-place cited her to appear and commanded her to follow him otherwise he would force her the People flock together but the Plaintiff tells them they need not trouble themselves for he proceeded according to Law and would do nothing by force cites her again to appear before Appius and the People perswade her to follow where the cause by reason of the expostulation of Icilius to whom she was betrothed not coming to hearing that day she was bailed and suffered to go under Sureties till the next but the second day Appius without hearing the Defendant or her Friends decreed that she should be a Bond-woman to Claudius who going to seise her finds the People resisting him Appius sends a Serjeant to assist him Virginius in a rage killeth his Daughter that she might not come into the Oppressors hands and a great uproar happening by the People Kindred and Friends of the Maid Appius cites Icilius the Spouse of the Maid as an Author of the Tumult and for his contumacy in not coming caused him to be attached and carried to Prison but Valerius and M. Horatius two popular and powerful Senators thrusting back the Serjeant said If Appius had any thing to charge him with by order of Law they would Bail him but if he went about to offer violence he should meet with his match After that Appius himself is arrested who desiring to be bailed and not to be put in Prison or lye in Chains by all the Friends and pittyful speeches he could make could not obtain it For that he had saith the Father of Virginia so much against all order of Law denyed the bailing of her who therefore commanded him to be carried to Prison as a person attaint and convict The Tribun of the Commons set him a day to plead for himself and make his answer but Appius before that day killed himself his Goods were confiscated by the Tribuns the rest of the Decem viri fled and were banished and all their Goods confiscated And the Ten Tables having two more added to them by the appointment of the Tribuns are set or hung up openly to be seen engraven in Brass The Romans having long before the compiling of the Twelve Tables used to Arrest and compel Men to appear in Judgment as is manifest by their manner of giving Bail before such time as Appius denyed to take Bail in the case of the Daugh-of Virginius which was ex veteri Jure an Old Law and Custom amongst them saith Pomponius And this grand Commotion of the People having nothing at all in it the while of complaint or action against the Laws of citing and compelling men to appear in Judgment and a putting them to Bail in the interim but a confirmation or allowance rather of them Threescore and five years after that Marcus Manlius Capitolinus so named because he had saved the City of Rome and the Capitol from ruine and spoil growing ambitiously discontented not contenting himself to deal in the Laws Agraria about the Division of Lands which had alwayes ministred occasions of Seditions began to intermeddle between the Debtors and Creditors and to overthrow saith Livy all keeping of Credit And seeing a Centurion condemned in an Action of Debt and carrying to Prison upon an Execution with a rout and crew of his Followers rescues and takes him from the Officers and crying out that his merits in saving the Capitol had been to little purpose if he could abide to see his Fellow-Souldier carried away captive did in sight of the People pay down the Debt set to sale his own Land and caused it to be openly cried that as long as he had one foot of ground or any thing else rest he would not see one of the People condemned upon Execution carried to Prison and stirred up such a Sedition in the City as the People followed him as the protector of their Liberties whereupon the Dictator being sent for from the Army assembled the Senate caused the Ivory Chair of State to be set in the Common-Hall and sent a Serjeant for Manlius who with a great retinue of his party presents himself before the Tribunal and tells the Dictator that now he saw he was created Dictator not against the Common Enemies but himself and the Commons of Rome for he did see well that he professed to maintain and bear out the Usurers against the Commons Whereupon after many insolent speeches the Dictator commanded him to be
a magis and minus and variatioe of Circumstances in such kind of Offences which may either lessen or heighten them Nor do those Rules which are given by Bracton for the reason of Arrests or Restraints of liberty in personal Actions before judgment that a Habeas Corpus which amounteth in effect to a Capias or Restraint of the person or his liberty is presently to be granted propter privilegium eruce signatorum mercatorum in respect or favour of those that were to go to the Holy War or were Merchants or propter causam sive necessitatem for some urgent cause or necessity of dispatch or in Trespas propter atrecitatem injuriae the horridness or evil of the Offence or propter personam contra quem injuriatum est ut si injuriatus sit Domino Regi vel Reginae vel eorum liberis vel Fratribus vel Sororibus vel eorum Parentibus Propinquis in respect of the Person against whom the wrong is done as the King Queen their Children Brothers Sisters or their Parents or Kindred come up to the Rules of Justice for urgency of Affairs necessities or occesions considerations or respect of Persons can of themselves be no cause of making Justice which is not to be a respecter of Persons to be Eccentrick or go a step out of her way or to do any thing in one case which should not or ought not to be done in other Cases having the like ground of reason and justice attended with the same circumstances neither can atrocitas facti vel injuriae the grandeur and oughliness of the offence be the sole cause or ground of Arrest in common or petty actions of Trespas or for words if there could properly be any atrocitas or hainousness in them or where it is done involuntarily as in Cases of Trespass or damage done by a mans Cattle for Trespass may be greater or lesser and if every Trespass could be understood to be of the greater size or magnitnde and so horrid and enormous yet there can be no reason to make the Caption or Arrest to be in part of Corporal punishment before the Judge or Magistrate be ascertained of the guilt of the Party or instructed how to keep the order which the Laws of God Nature and Nations and our Magna Carta have enjoyned that is to say to punish only secundum quantitatem delicti according to the nature of the offence And that supposed ground or reason given by Sir Edward Coke will be as deficient that the Common Law of England abhorring all force as the capital Enemy to it subjects the body to imprisonment until it hath made agreement with the Party and fined to the King bring any better reason with it For if the King shall as he conceiveth punish force by a Capias to Arrest the body before the party be permitted to defend him-or a Tryal had by Jury whether he be guilty or not that would be more against Magna Carta then any Process of Capias or Arrest in Debt can be dreamed or fancied to be and a Capias pro fine after a Tryal and finding guilty will either shew that it was not the arresting of the body in Trespass which was intended or inflicted for the punishment but the Capias pro fine and if both the Capias in Trespass before Judgement and the Capias pro fine after Judgement should be inflicted for one and the same offence They would not be secundum modum sive quantitatem delicti proportionate to the offence and the Capias to Arrest would be before the King or his Courts of Justice could be ascertained that there was an offence Nor will that other cause or ground given by him in the Report of the said Sir William Herberts Case that the King may by the Common Law arrest the body of the Debtor for that Thesaurus Regis est vinoulum bellorum nervus The Money and Treasure of the King is the Bond of Peace and Sinuwes of War obtain the conclusion which he aims at For that were to make a King or supream Magistrate which ought to be Lex viva and Justice it self to destroy that which he was sworn to protect and give him licence to break Laws who is not in ordinary Cases against the Rules of Justice and right reason to give such a liberty to himself or any others or to do an act for an advantage or necessity which the even and adequate Rules of Justice common right or right reason cannot allow So as by the favour of so great an authoâ—â—ty in our Laws as Sir Edward Coke is and with as much reverence as is or can be due to so great a lover of the Laws of England and the veneration which he justly merits I must of necessity by what appears in the Cabinet and Treasury of time and Antiquity and what is clearly to be perceived in those pure streams which the Fountains of Justice and right reason have imparted unto Mankind assert what I have done and conclude that he was a man and hath as the best Authors may in their Books sometimes do which are not Scripture and Canonical erred in averring that there was no Process of arresting the body of a Debtor either before or after judgment until the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. which gave Process of Outlawry in Actions of Debt When in allowing Process of Arrest in debt in the Kings Case as he doth in Actions of Trespass he must acknowledge the same reason and necessity which is a just and rational coertion to appear before the Tribunals of Justice and of caution to be given to abide their judgments to be in Actions of Debt and other personal Actions And he himself in many of his Books and Writings hath as well as the Civil Law and our Common Law and the Law of Nations affirmed that the same Reason may claim the like Law For the reason that Joseph would have imprisoned his Brethren upon a suspition that they were come to espie the Land and kept Simeon a Prisoner until their words and denials were proved gives us the reason necessity and justice of arresting in personal Actions and Debt as well as Trespass until cause or caution be given of appearing in Courts of Justice and performing the judgments And that learned Judge could if he were now living very well remember that he hath often said as well as found that many of our Acts of Parliament are but declaratory of the Common Law and that which was long before used and understood to be as it was reasonable That the matter or thing excepted in an Act of Parliament is not included in any purvieu or provision of it but is out of the reach and gun-shot thereof and that when in the Statute of Magna Carta made in 9 H. 3. ca. 29. it is said That no Freeman shall be taken and imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or free Customes or be outlawed or exiled
to be so unjust as where they gave a Plaintiff but three hours to Plead they allowed the Defendant nine And it is not yet gone out of the memory of Man that in the year 1642 or 1643 the course of stealing or hurrying of Judgments now unhappily borrowed from the Innovation of the late wicked times of Usurpation in Actions of Ejectment was believed by Justice Bacon in the Court of Kings Bench and Justice Reeve in the Court of Common Pleas to be such a vioviolation of our Laws as they Publickly declaimed against it and threatned to imprison any Attorney that should practice in such a manner And with great authority and warrant of our Lawes and right reason for that as it was justly and truely said by the Judges in the Reign of King Edward the first that non summonitus nec attachiatus per Legem terre prejudiciari non potest and Fleta an approved Lawyer in the Reign of that King and King Edward the second his Son hath published it to be a great and known Truth that the Court of Common Pleas cannot hold Plea in real and personal Actions without the Commission or Authority of a Writ original out of the Chancery and that without it nec Warrantum nec Jurisdictionem neque Coercionem habent and our Laws did then and long after not proceed upon such warrant or commission until the Plaintiff had actually given sureties to prosecute and maintain his action and the Sheriff to whom such original Writ was directed for to summon or attach the debtor to appear before the said justices had returned that he was summoned or attached as the nature of the Action required or had nothing whereby to be summoned or attached When but a few years preceding that well deserved indignation of those two worthy Judges that excellent most just lawdable and rational course of justice had been endeavoured to have been subverted by one Elsliot of a degree betwixt an Attorney and a Barrister and a man very bold able enough to make and contrive tricks and abuses in Law proceedings who having about the middle of the reign of King Charles the Martyr as a Reprobate and Cast away in the Law shifted himself from England into Ireland and from thence after some bad prancks there played returning back again with as much poverty as impudence attending upon him and having a desire to get some money by a contrivance to gain a sudaine possession of some Lands or houses for one as bad as himself upon a judgment by default against the Landlord or his Tenant who were to know nothing of it caused a declaration to be prepared in an action of Ejectment against a feigned Def t. or ejector in the name of a feigned Lessee upon a short Lease pretended to be made by his naughty Clyent and left at the house of the Tenant who not well apprehending the force and extent of the project a judgment by default was entred possession surprized and taken for which upon complaint made to the Judges of the Court of Kings Bench in which Court the action was supposed to have been laid and examination of the fact the judgment was made void possession restored and Master Elsliot the contriver committed and told by Justice Barkley that it was a shame that ever he should come or shew his face in a Court of justice Howsoever getting himself afterwards enlarged and the confusion and troubles of the late civil Warrs disturbing and breaking in upon the Law and all the Courts of Justice Mr. Elsliot began again to appear to be somebody engages in another exploit which was to gain by the like device accompanied with force some other naughty ways possession of an house and a very considerable estate in Lands in the County of Essex of Sir Adam Littletons the Father of Sir Thomas Littleton Knight now a member of the house of Commons in Parliament who to his great cost and trouble endeavouring to extricate and free himself and his Fathers Estate from the peril and danger of such a villany may well remember that a counterfeit record was in that pretended suit privatly layd in the office of the Records in the Tower of London sworn unto and offered to be justified but was at length taken as it ought to be for a Roguish piece of Forgery and Sir Adam Littleton and his Estate freed from any further disturbance Whilst that no smal parcel of Knavery being in great respect with the Agitators of the then called Parliament Army Levellers other State moulders and stiling himself the Esquire at armes being somtimes a Prisoner in New-gate and somtimes out wanted not a Liberal maintenance from his Patrons and great Masters until death shortly after unexpectedly rid the world of him From which reasonless and ungodly formula or way of proceeding rather to be exploded then embraced in actions of Ejectment and so utterly against the Law evil examples being oftner followed then good by some of his proselites and the connivance or want of courage in some of the Judges in the time of the Cromwelian usurpation dum sui non fuerunt knowing better but doing worse the same came again to be revived and creep into an allowance with a note indorced by the Attorney in the name of the incognito or casual ejector directed to the Tenant or Landlord requiring them to appeare and look to the action and confess Lease Ouster and Entry otherwise he must and would confess a judgment or let it pass by default As if such a judgment acknowledged by practice and confederacy could not with a great deal of ease have been reversed by a court that should not be so abused and the parties contrivant severely punished Of which kind of irregularity in the Law and wandring out of the old Paths never to be justified the Justices of the court of Kings-bench have been so sensible as they have for some years last past caused a Writ of Latitat which antiently was used to be warranted by a VVrit Original of the Chancery to be awarded and sued out against the feigned ejector And it is not half a yeare agoe since the Pillory of Westminster proclaimed a Brewer to be more Crafty then wise or honest when to gain an indirect possession of some houses by Judgments upon defaults having fudled the Tenants with Drink and Tobacco And giving them peices of the declarations as waste paper when they knew not what had been written therein to give fire to their tobacco thought he had snapt them with judgments upon defaults when he made oath that he had left declarations at their houses where they were in that manner made drunk and could neither say or sware to the contrary But unde or from whence soever it came or if this new manner of Law proceedings could have derived its pedegree from any more Noble an Ancestor It will if every Client and his Attorney who is no member of the court but only
or peremptory is by the Civilians themselves acknowledged to be a deviation à jure communi in casibus necessitatis tantum recepta quando alio modo quiâ— citari non potest Secondly Vbi locus non est â—utus ubi citandus habitat Thirdly Si persona est vagabunda quo casu edictum eo loco affigi debet ubi solita est conversari That such a possession is notwithstanding but fiduciary and the Plaintiff only put in possession Custodia causa vice pignoris detiâ—et donee reus veniat responsurus That a 2d trial decree or sentence restitutio in integrum do not seldom afterwards follow And that appeals from the lower Courts or Judges to the higher Commissions of adjuncts and revisions will never allow that Law to be â—o desirable expedite or little chargeable as our Common Laws are which our Novellists would perswade us to renounce and abandon Of which and the disparity of a great part of the Body of the Civil Laws with those of our cipal and common Laws the Dukes Earls and Barons of England were so sensible as in the eleventh year of the Reign of King Richard the 2. in the cause and appeal of Thomas Duke of Glocester and others against Robert de Vere Duke of Ireland the Earl of Suffolk and others they denyed to proceed to Judgment thereupon according to the Law civil and declared que la Roialme de Angliterre ne estoit devant ces Heures ne al intent du Roy signiours de parlement unques ne serra rule ne govern per le ley civil and our Ancestors more than what they retained of some of the actions rules and directions of reason which that excellent Law afforded and was necessary would not as our learned Selden hath observed constanti adhaesione by a constant perseverance and affection be drawn from that singular reverence and esteem which they had of the common Law which so long a course of time and antiquity had fitted to their nature and Genius In so much as William de la Pole Duke of Suffolk was in the Reign of King Henry the sixth accused amongst other things by the Commons in Parliament that he had sought to introduce the Civil Law And the great Cardinal Wolsey was in the Reign of King Henery the eight indicted or informed against quod ipse intendebat finaliter antiquissimas Anglicanas leges penitus subvertere enervare in universum hoc Regnum Anglie ejusdem Regni populum legibus Imperialibus dict legibus Civilibus earundem legum canonibus subjugare And King James coming from a Kingdom where those Laws were much in use and seemed to have some inclination to introduce or intermingle some part of it with our Common Laws did notwithstanding forbear to do it acknowledging that the Civil Law was not applicable to this government or fit for it And our Innovators that have been so wiling to intermingle with their System that part of the Civil Law which in the cases of contumacy did allowe a missio bonorum repleuisable as aforesaid may upon a further search and enquiry satisfie themselves and others that for the expedition of Justice put on and perswaded by the increase of trade and insolvency of debtors the Caesarean or Civil Law hath long ago forsaken their course of granting judgments for not appearing missionem rum and Seisure and found the Citatio realis captura incarceratio to be the more ready and less prejudicial way of compelling debtors or Defendants to appear in judgment For certainly to inforce perswade or give a libertie to the people in their Law Suits and concernments depending thereupon to circulate when they may go a more easy and less expensive way nearer more streight and better conducing to their honest ends will be but to vex and tire both Plaintiffs and defendants and multiply their charges When to draw and prepare the declarations which in Debt and common Actions were until the fourteenth year of the Reign of King James to be entred by the Filacers and ought yet if the cause or reason of their remitting that ancient part of their imployment do cease and be taken away the Plaintiffs will in this new devised expedient for a quick and Pie-powder Course of Justice be put to a charge for the drawing of their Declarations before hand when it may be there will be no need of them and to pay for the Copies of them which in a more regular course after apparances entred were to be payed for by the Defendants And to the Trouble and charge of entring judgments and the hazard of the loss of charges poundage aud other fees payd to Sheriffs and Bayliffs upon execution or paying of damages where they are wrongfully or not well obtained multitude of Affidavits pro con of motions in Court on the one side and the other many referrences and reports wagers of non-summons writs of restitution actions on the case for non summons or for slander or defamation brought for malitious contrivances cum muliis aliis which will increase and heighten the Bill of Charges And that goods Seized inventaried and sold by under Sheriffs and Bayliffs at half or less value though it may suffice one greedy and merciless Creditor will not be unlikely to defeat another or many others of their more just debts and utterly blast the Debtor in his credit by which he might well have subsisted and survived the disgrace and trouble of so furious a prosecution And that the long ago trodden path or way of compelling or bringing men unto judgment or unto Courts of Justice would not so frequently be made use of in England the way of Summons Pone and distress being not yet altogether forsaken and disused as it was formerly for that betwixt the Reigns of Canutus a Danish King the 25 year of the reign of King Edward the Third and for some ages after there neither could be any either frequency of arrest or necessity for it as there hath been since and is now CHAP. III. The reason and necessity of the more frequâ—nt use of VVrits of Arrest and Outlawry then was before thi making of the Statute of 25 E. ca. 17. IN regard that in those former Ages there were more Lands than Tenants more real Estates but little personal the Trade of the Nation not the fortieth part of what it is now so little before the Reign of King Edward the third as those few Merchants that came hither had Letters of safe conduct granted unto them before they came and that the Commerce and Trade which was in King Edward the Third's time long after was only with the Esterlings and Hanse Towns Burgundy Aquitaine some Genoese and Italian Merchants the Turky East and West Indy and Affrican trades not then or long after known or used Usury so horrid and damnable a Crime as it was a cause of Excommunication denyal
non prospexit recourse is to be had to the Body of the Tenant and if he be not to befound the Landlord is to impute it to his own negligence that he did not look better to it Cum quis ad warrantum vocatus fuerit Christianus vel Judaus qui terram non tenuerit in feodo quae capi possit in manum domini Regis per quam distringi possint pracipiatur vicecomiti quod habeat corpora eorum when any man is vouched to warranty be he Christian or Jew and hath not Land which may be taken into the Kings hands or by which he may be distrained the Sheriff shall be commanded to take his Body or bring him And a Bishop being Summond in a quare non admisit cum non venit nec se excusat per nun-nec per Essoniatorem attachietur when he neither comes nor sends his excuse nor essoins shall be attached Upon a writ awarded to a Bishop to command him to bring before the Kings Justices a Clark or Minister in holy Orders refusing to find Pledges because he was in holy Orders and had no lay Fee whereby he might be distrained if the Bishop did not after a Summons pone Distringas awarded against himself cause him to come the Court did proceed against the Clark upon the contempt and cause him to be arrested nor could the Sheriff or his Bayliffs incur any punishment for doing of it for the execution of the Law saith Bracton wrongeth no man By the Statute of Marlebridg made in the 52 year of the Reign of that King if any shall not obey or suffer Summons attachments or executions of the same according to the Law and customs of the Kingdom they were to be punished The word Attachment being saith the learned Vossius derived from a French word to apprehend or detain An Attachment is to arrest force or compel a man denying to come to judgement saith Sir Henry Spelman And by Skene a learned Scotch Lawyer is defined to be a certain Bond or Constraint of the Law whereby a Defendant is unwillingly compelled to answer in Judgment to the Party complaining In the Statute of 52 Henry the third where a Capias is given against accomptants it is said they shall be Attached by their bodies An Attachment made for disobeying a Writ of prohibition is in the very form of a pone the awarding and entry of a pone is that the defendant should be Attached And saith Bracton the course or solemnity of Attachments to compel the Defendant to come to the Court to answer his contempt was not so always observ'd but in trespas for the greatness of the offence or in favour of Soldiers that were going to the Wars or of Merchants or such as required haste in Actions of Debt and it is probable that the Actions or Suits of Merchants were most commonly of that nature the Judges granted an Habeas Corpus which to that purpose was in effect as much as a Capias whereby the Sheriff was commanded all delays set apart in regard of such haste and priviledge to bring the Body of the Defendant to answer the Plaintiff in an Action of Debt or Trespas as the case required with a Clause in the Later end or perclose of the Writ that the Sheriff should be grievously amerced if he refuse to do it By an Act of Parliament made in the 52 year of the Reign of the aforesaid King in a Plea of Common custody or guard by reason of ward if the deforcers came not at the great distress the Writ was to be renewed twice or thrice within the half year following and if after the Writ read and proclaimed in open County the deforceant absent himself and the sheriff cannot take his Body to bring before the Justice then as a Rebeâ—â—e shall loose the Seisin of his ward By the Statute made in the third year of the Reign of King Edward the first if any under Sheriff or other do withhold Prisoners replevishable after they have offerd sufficient security he shall pay a grievous amerciament to the King in which act of Parliament men committed by the King or his Justices are excepted and declared to be not replevishable By a Statute of the aforesaid King made in the same year the title of it being against the arresting of men in Liberties great men and their Bayliffs the Kings Officers only excepted to whom special authority sayeth the Statute is given were not to attach men passing thorough their Jurisdictions with their goods compelling men to answer before them upon contracts and covenants c. And the writ of prohibition in the Register awarded upon that Statute is for attaching a man to answer upon contracts and covenants Britton who wrote his Book by the command of King Edward the first saith if any man will complain of a debt under forty shillings let him find Pledges to prosecute his debtor and if he that is sued in Trespas maketh default let him be distrained And that in an action of debt if there be not a sufficient distress the Difendants might be taken by their Bodies be they Clarks or Laymen Fleta or whosoever was the Author of the Book so called reciting the then manner of proceedings at law as an old and accustomed course saith they were by Summons Attachments and distress in personal actions the entries and awarding thereof upon record being the very same with little difference as they are now used If a debtor had bound himself to be in default of payment distrained by the Steward and marshal of the Kings house then upon security given by the Creditor to prosecute a distringas was awarded against the debtor until he found Pledges so as he were within the virge and if he were personally to be found was to be Attached by his body until he should by Pledges acquit himself and if he had not Pledges was to be held in Custody until that he answered the Creditor non tamen in vinculis or if he found Pledges and after made default the Pledges were to be amerced and the Defendant arrested and detained and not be bailed or let loose by Pledges before he had answered And that not only Marescallus sub suo periculo omnes captos infra virgam custodire debet sed de eis coram Senescallo respondere de Judicatis plenam facere executionem the Marshal should at his Peril keep all that were taken within the virge but answer for them before the Steward and ought to take in execution those against whom Judgment should be given and the Steward did of course command the Clark that keepeth the placita Aulae pro Rege Rolls and Records of the Kings Court to direct his writ Marescallo quod ipsum de quo fit sine dilatione attachiari faciat to the Marshal that he do without delay attach him of whom any complaint should
be made In the seventeenth year of the Reign of King Edward the second a nihil habet being returned by a Sheriff upon a Distringas in wast a Capias was awarded by the Justices of the Court of Common Pleas against the defendant And that if a Sheriff return upon a pone a Tarde that the VVrit came so late unto him as he could not execute it and it be averred that the VVrit came time enough or that the Party was present and might be attached the Sheriff was to be amerced Personal Actions saith the Mirrour of Justice so much admired by Sir Edward Coke have their introductions by Attachments of their Bodies real by Summons and mixt actions By Summons and after by Attachment in personal Action And in the same Kings Reign if a Religious man Professed had forsaken the house and become vagrant a VVrit upon a Certificate of the Abbot or Prior issued out of the Chancery to the Sheriff to take him In the eight year of the Reign of King Edward the third presentatio facta fuit apud Lincolne contra Thomam de Carleton sub Vicecomitem Indictatum de extorsionibus aliis malefactis inter alia quod mittit homines arrestatos pro debitis in ergastulum strictum fetidum inter latrones quousque finem fecerint cum illo pro deliberatione sua extra c. Contra formam statuti plurima alia pro quibus fecit finem cum Rege postea pardonatur per breve domini Regis eo quod invenit Regi in guerra sua Scotiae tres homines armatos duos Hobelarios Thomas de Carleton under Sheriff of the county of Lincolne was indicted at Lincoln for several Extortions and Misdemeanors and amongst other things for that he did put such as were Prisoners and arrested for Debt in a close and loathsom Prison amongst Theeves until they gave him mony for their better accomodation against the form of the Statute and did commit many other Misdemeanours for which he paid a Fine to the King and was pardoned for that he furnished the King in his VVars in Scotland with three armed men and two Hoblers or common Soldiers By an Act of Parliament made in the 18 year of the Reign of the same King a Capias is to be awarded against such as not having wherewithal to live do refuse to serve 22. Ed. 3. It was held for Law that upon a Judgment obtained for Debt or Damages the Body of the Defendant might be taken in execution and by the opinion of Thorpe and Basset Judges where conusance of Pleas is granted there are also granted all things necessary unto it as to proceed by way of Capias Distresse c. And it was in those times agreed to be Law that the Judges have Power by Word of Mouth to command a Defendant to be Attached and that he that Bailed a man might by the Law without Process Arrest or take the partie Bailed and bring him into the Court. All which put together and brought to a due consideration with the small or no difference which is betwixt a Pone and a Capias as to the Attaching and Compelling of Defendants to appear in the Tenor and antiently practised and yet intended use of it may be enough to Rescue us from the imputation of Error or presumption if pace tanti viri we shall take that which hath been said in Sir Will. Herberts case by Sir Edward Coke in his third Reports that the Body of a Defendant in an Action of debt was not subject or lyable to an execution before the Statute made in the 25th year of the Reign of King Edward the third to be no more than an opinion built upon a great mistake for that Statute was not made only to give Process of Arrest by Capias upon a nihil habet or non est Inventus upon a Pone or a nihil habet or non est Inventus returned upon a Distringas by a Sheriff because it was so before by the Common Law of England it being altogether improbable that those who had Lands or any visible Estate in Goods or Chattels were before the making of that Statute always Resident or did never hide or absent themselves for Debt or some other Actions to avoid a Summons or some Arrest or compulsory way to bring them into Courts of Justice to answer and give satisfaction unto such as had cause to complain of them or that those who had no Lands or Goods were always to be free and exempted from any restraint or arrest of their Bodys upon actions of Debt or for any other matters commenced against them But was intended only to have Process to the Exigend and Utlary which could not be without a Write of Capias in Actions of Debt detinue of Chattels and taking of Beasts per Capias Exigend selon retourne du vicecount come home use en breifs daccompt by Capias and Exigenâ— according to the return of the Sheriff as was used in Writs of accompt and being at the petition of the Commons in Parliament priont les Commons the King as the record it self witnesseth did answer I l plese ou Roy que ainsi soit quil soit mys en Estatut it pleaseth the King that it should be so and that it be put or formed into a Statute And the reason of that petition of the Commons in Parliament to the King which introduced and procured that Act of Parliament many Acts of Parliament and good Laws in the former Ages being usher'd in and obtained by the Petitions of the Commons in Parliament to their King and Sovereign may in all probability seem to be for that they did not think either the former Process of the Law by Summons Pone Distringas or Capias to be severe or sufficiently coercive or so powerful to bring a Defendant to Justice as the fear of an Utlary which in the Saxons times were so Terrible as he that was outlawed was accompted to be a Friendless or Lawless man and was afterwards so formidable to those that by the contempt of the Laws incurred in the forfeiture of their Liberties Goods Chattels Profits of their Lands and Benifits of the Laws as it might well be believed every man would be careful to avoid so great a danger and trouble And therefore in the eighteenth year of the Reign of that King being but seven years before the making of that Statute it was deemed to be for the good of the People to have it declared by Act of Parliament in what cases process of Exigend and Utlary should be that is to say against such as received the Kings Wool or Mony and detained it such as transported Wool not Cocquetted or without Custom against Conspirators and Confederates of quarrels such as commited Ryots and brought in false mony if they could not be found or brought in by Attachment or Distress and not
then what should be just and shew as much mercy if there should be occasion for it as the Debtor should have need of and that every man would be as willing to do right one unto another as it should be asked or demanded of him But that being not to be found in too many of the Sons of men or the smallest Societies nor was alwayes or is likely to be in the sublunaâ—y and lapsed condition of mankind some kind of compulsion was necessary and a lesser then what is now or hath been most anciently practised could not be to any purpose unless we could content our selves and take that to be a happiness which would certainly never prove to be any to have Justice which next to the Creation and the mercy of all mercies the Redemption of mankind and the Divine Protection and Providence is one of the greatest blessings which was ever imparted by God unto it and as to the continual guard and preservation of our lives liberties and estates is more necessary and less to be wanted then our food apparel houses or places of rest and is the great support of the being and well being of all humane Societies to be a meer speculation or empty word for Schollars only to dispute of in the Schools of Ethiques Or sit like Old Ely in a Chair with Why do you so my Sons and permit every man to deceive mischief one another and render the Justice of the Nation to be nugatory for the restraint now used of the Body of a Defendant refusing to appear voluntarily or upon a Summons or Citation is not in vinculis or Cippis in Chains or Fetters not ad poenam but ad Cautionem and in so moderate and gentle a manner and lessening of their liberty as it is but temporary and when so done is but after many delayes threatnings warnings and forbearings and most commonly occasioned by their own default or some long abuse of the Plaintiffs patience and such a remedy or course taken is no more if rightly interpreted then what common and right reason necessity and endeavour of right to be done did require And when it is but Majoris mali vitandi causa to avoid greater evils is so little in derogation of publick liberty as although it may for a time be something prejudicial to some particular man it proves many times to be a special help unto many men to recover their Debts or Money due unto them the want whereof might otherwise be a cause of their own imprisonment And so long as any man is a Member of a Common-wealth his liberty is to attend or depend upon the good of that Common-wealth otherwise he may claim a liberty as a Free-man but not as an English-man Nor could our Fore-fathers in the necessity of bringing or compelling men to appear in Judgment as well as of the preservation of the alwayes very necessary Power Authority and Jurisdiction of Courts of Justice which do order and direct it ever tell how to imagine that it should be understood to be a Tyranny to arrest attach or imprison such as should refuse to appear upon the Summons or Proces of a Court of Justice or be fugitive or like to run away or that it ever was or can be deemed to be an oppression to enforce such Persons in a legal and orderly way to pay their Debts and do that which God commandeth them to do and hath no less Justice or conscience in it then to be constrained to do right one unto another perform Covenants and Promises and obey Magistrates and Laws in force when the Book and Dictates of God himself do accompt a Man wicked that borroweth and payeth not and the wilful deceiving of Men in the not paying of Money due unto them or not performing of Promises is by good Divines and Expositors conceived to be a kind of theft and reckoned to be within the meaning of the Eight Commandment and to be numbred amongst the breaches and transgressions of it and it is no Tyranny by the Law of Nature for a Man to stay or lay hold of one who is running away with his Money or Goods or for a Judge by the Common Law of England to commit such as misbehave themselves by word or gesture in their presence or a Court of Justice or for a Creditor by the Civil Law to Arrest or stay his Debtor if he be running away before he can get a Warrant or Proces from a Judge To punish Souldiers with death by the Law Military for running away from their Colours stragling in their March or going above a Mile from the Army without licence to Arrest or Imprison such as resort to unlawful Games until they shall find Sureties no longer to use or haunt any place where such unlawful Games are used or to imprison Collectors for the Poor refusing to accompt And Sir Edward Coke in his Commentaries upon that part of Magna Charta saith that a Watchmans arresting a Night-walker or one that hath dangerously wounded another or that keepeth Company with a notorious Thief whereby he comes to be suspected is lawful and no breach of Magna Charta although it be done without the Warrant of a Writ By what rule of right reason then shall so gentle and necessary a course or way of compelling Men by Proces of Arrest to appear in a Court of Justice in order to a Sentence or Judgment when he may be bailed be styled a Tyranny or Oppression When it shall not be so called or esteemed to take a Man in Execution for not obeying or performing a Judgement where he cannot be bailed or shall it be Tyranny to Arrest a Defendant to oblige him to appear in a Cause or Action Civil and none at all in a Criminal An Oppression or Tyranny to Arrest a Defendant to constrain him to appear in an Action of Debt and none at all in an Action of Trespas Nay rather is it not an Oppression to endeavour to defraud and injure Men detain their Estates and Livelyhoods withhold from the Poor and needy their right and undo the Widdows and Fatherless by keeping away the Money which should feed or keep them from starving without making satisfaction or shall it be no Tyranny to do the wrong but a Tyranny in a legal and ordinary manner or way to seek to be relievâ—d against it Or how can it be justly accompted to be a Tyranny when no whereelse it hath been so esteemed but was so little believed to be a Tyranny or Oppression by other Nations or any thing less then right reason as they have not only made use of the Proces of Arrest and Imprisonment of the Body in Actions of Debt and other the like Personal Actions in these later Ages but long before the Incarnation of our blessed Saviour The Athenians had their Bailiffs Serjeants and Apparitors to bring Defendants into their Courts of Justice and the Plaintiff might
and divers other Commissioners therein named to call before them such Prisoners and their Creditors in and upon Actions of Debt Gase Trespasses Trover Detinue or other Personal Actions Judgements and Executions whatsoever thereupon and to treat for Compositions and Agreements some of the Judges of the Court out of which such prisoners have been committed to be privy to such Compositions and Agreements to the end that the said Prisoners night be relieved and have such reasonable years dayes and times of payment for such debts and damages as they shall not be presently able to satisfie and with such Security for payment thereof as in equity and good Conscience having respect to the ability of the Prisoners and charge of Wife and Children and other incidents to pious Cases considered And if any Creditor should refuse to appear before them the Commissioners were impowred to punish them and take such Order for their Appearance as they should think meet and to use all lawful wayes to make them take such reasonable Compositions as to any Three or more of them should be thought meet And his Majesty therein Declared that his meaning was to be aiding and assisting with his Grace and Faâ—vour to the misery and calamity of such as be truly poor and distressed and not unto such as lye in Prison rather of wilfulness and obstinacy and out of a resolution to retain large and ample Estates to themselves and therefore straightly charged the said Commissioners to be very vigilant and circumspect therein and did in the said Commission mention that Queen Elizabeth did upon the supplication of the Prisoners in the Prisons of the Fleet and Kings Bench in the Eight and twentieth Year of her Reigne Authorize certain Commissioners under the Great Seal of England for the ordering and compounding of the Controversies and Causes between the distressed Prisoners and their Creditors and such others by whom tbey were detained Prisoners or in Execution and contined the said Commission nntil her Decease And that King James being informed that certain Clauses in the said Commission were Derogatory to the Common Laws of England and that by colour of the said Commission which was intended for the Charitable relief of poor miserable and distressed Prisoners certain refractory and obstinate Debtors which rather wanted will then meanes to satisfie their just Debes took occasion to molest and trouble their Creditors did to prevent all occasions of Inconveniencies to his loving Subjects especially such as tended to the breach of his Laws forbear for many years to renew the said Commission and finding that his forbearance had wrought a good effect by discouraging obstinate and wilful Debtors that sought nothing more then Evasions to avoid the payment of their just Debts so also that for want of that or some other charitable course for the relief of such as were truly and indeed poor distressed and miserable and wanted meanes to satisfie their Creditors it had been occasion to pester and fill his Prisons with the bodies of such persons whose punishment could no way avaâ—l their Creditors but rather was an hindrance to the satisfaction of their Debts for that during the time of their restraint they were no wayes able to go about or attend their lawful business but must of force consume themselves and that little that they had miserably and in Prison did by his Commission under the Great Seal of England in the Sixteenth Year of his Reigne by the advice of the then Lord Chanâ—cellor of England and also of divers of his principal Judges of his Courts at Westminster authorize the Commissioners therein named to proceed according to the Tenor of the said Commission for the relief of the said poor Prisoners in the said Prisons and afterwards being informed that his said Commission had not taken that good Effect which was expected renewed the said Commission and thereby prescribed and directed such a moderate course as that neither the Insolence of wilful and obstinate Debtors should be thereby incouraged to the derogation of his Laws nor yet his Grace and Clemency be wanting unto such to whom it should be meet to Extend the same did upon the humble suite of the distressed Prisoners in the Prisons of the Marshalsea and other Prisons in and about the Cities of London and Westminster and the places near adjoyning to the same whose Cases were as much to be commiserated and lamented as the said Prisoners in the said Prisons of the Kings Bench and the Fleet by another Commission under the Great Seal of England in the Two and twentieth Year of his Reigne authorize certain Commissioners therein named for the Ordering and Compounding of the Causes of the distressed Prisoners in the Prisons within the places aforesaid and that his Majesties Royal Father did by Two several Commissions under the Great Seal of England the one bearing Date in the Fourth Year of his Reigne and the other in the Sixth impower divers Persons therein named to the same or the like purpose Nevertheless the Good Old Cause as they are pleased to misâ—name it with all its hypocritical tricks of State must not by any meanes be abandoned but they which did so much adore that Empusa or Witch called the Publique Faith which like the Golden Calf made by the Idolatrous children of Israel helped them to great store of money plate and Rings to furnish out and maintain a Rebellion could not now forbear to be as violent as they could to pull Down the ever to be reâ—spected and honoured better Publiqe Faith and Justice of the Nation and Disturb his Majesty his subordinate Judges Magistrates in the administration thereof and therefore some Synon or Trojan horse was of necessity to be made use of or introduced under a colour of publique Good or some stratagem or mine prepared to accomplish that by cunning and circumvention which by suit or force of Law reason and arguments they could not before be able to obtain and for that had as they thought a pattern or way cut or chalked out by the before-mentioned S. D. and some of his levelling Clerks and Attornies associating with him in their aforesaid proposals presented to the Committee for Regulation of the Laws in the year 1650 wherein they alledged that what they had proposed was not that the Writ of Capias should be taken away first but humbly conceived that it would be better by finding out nearer and cheaper wayes to bring the old road to be neglected then to deprive the suitors of the Old before they can have experience of the new and it was only proposed by way of supplement not to take away the antient course of proceedingâ— by way of Capias and â—â—igent if the case shall require it CHAP. XIX That the Proceedings at the Common Law desired by the new way of a peremptory Summons or the old by Writs of Summons Pone and Distringas or Writs of Capias at the Plaintiffs pleasure are not consistent or agreeable