Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	according_a	church_n	power_n	1,492	5	5.1156	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A41778	The fourth principle of Christs doctrine vindicated being a brief answer to Mr. H. Danvers book, intituled, A treatise of laying on of hands, plainly evincing the true antiquity and perpetuity of that despised ministration of prayer with imposition of hands for the promise of the spirit ... / by Tho. Grantham.	Grantham, Thomas, 1634-1692.	1674 (1674)	Wing G1533; ESTC R43208	35,212	40

Separable Fourthly To make the Lords Supper pass for a beginning Teaching as well as Babtism is presumption indeed the one appertaining only to the new borne for admission into the Church the other to the most grown Christian as well as others for his edification And one would think that Mr. D. who must have such plain Scripture for what we urge as beginning Principles should not thus vary from his owne Rule when he assignes any thing for such Fifthly I fear Mr. D. is some what guilty of pertinacity in saying the Laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. is as plurall as Baptisms seeing he cannot be ignorant how Mr. Fisher hath unvailed that mistake in answer to a Query wherein I think Mr. D. was concerned which as he terms a grevious and gross mistake so he shews that the Laying on Heb. 6. 2 is a substantive of the singular number both in the Greek and English and some of the Learned and Judicious of his owne partly have to my knowledge confessed that to be an egregious mistake and sith he gives no reason for his persisting in his former opinion but barely contradicts his opponents it is to me very Suspicious that he hath nothing to defend himselfe withal save his Sic volo sic jubeo And here let me note that seeing Heb. 6. 2. speaks but of one Laying on of Hand there is a necessity that we determine which it is else we must confess none can know the first Principles But to take off the force of our Arguments for the necessity of Imposition of hands with prayer for the holy Spirit as a Principle in the more compleat Constitution of Christian Churches Mr. D. is pleased to aske this question If every one of these Principles in Heb. 6. are so absolutely to be taken in by Babes and without which we are not esteeme them communicable what do you say to the Doctrine of Baptisms in the text one of the Principles and foundations of the Gospell must be all Baptised with the Baptism of the holy Ghost and of sufferings also or not to be received into Communion The reception of the holy Spirit according to the promise Answ 1 made to the Church is not a thing in our power but the meanes to seek for it is in our power we must believe and pray for the promise so must we also believe and wait for the Resurrection and the Eternall judgment And so must we believe and expect sufferings for Christ else we have not rightly Laid the foundation in repect of the Doctrine of Baptismes but now to argue from the things which are in our power to do to the things which are only in the power and disposeing of the Almighty is irrationall and dangerous and may be retorted upon Mr. D. after this manner Seeing you suppose a man may be admitted to communion without two Baptisms of the three Heb. 6. 2. why do you make the other so absolutely necessary now let him defend him selfe for that practical part of the doctrine of Baptisms and thereby he will defend me for that practick part of the fourth principle 2. But if any shall deny the promise of the spirit with which all Christians are to pray that they may be baptized contrary to the late dangerous doctrine of some who would restrain the Baptism of the Spirit to miraculous gifts opperations or signes c. and perswade us the Baptism of the Spirit is ceased or that shall deny the doctrine of Sufferings or Sufferings themselves as not pertaining to them or if any shall teach others to deny these truths as you teach others to deny prayer with imposition of hands and will needs persist in opposing themselves against all endeavours used to reform and amend them I say such may lawfully be denied communion in the Churches of God and thus we have considered Mr. D. his several expositions upon Heb. 6. 2. Of the Laying on of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. Neither hath Mr. D. wrote advisedly P. 48. where he teacheth that the imposition of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. and 1 Tim. 4. 14. are both one for as much as they are evidently distinguished in three respects as first In respect of the persons administring them That in 2 Tim. 1. 6. being performed by Paul only the laying on of my Hands the other by more then he 1 Tim. 4. 14. The Laying on of the Hands of the Presbytery surely if more had acted in the first then Paul himself he would not have arrogated the whole service to himself as if the blessing received came by what he did and the rest stood but for Ciphers no this is nothing like that humble Apostle who was less in his own eye then the least of all Saints neither can it be proved that he was one of the Presbytery that Ordained Timothy though Mr. D. concludes he was though perhaps he might be one of them 2. The Gifts are clearly distinguished Those 2 Tim. 1. 6. being the Gifts which are common to all Saints as much as to Timothy namely 1. The Spirit of Love which all that are born of God do share in by the Holy Ghost Rom. 5. 5. 2. Power or strength 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 virtutis not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 potestas authority and this strength all Saints have need of 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sobrietatis sobriety or soundness of mind which also every true Christian should have hence its plain that the Gift of God which Timothy received by the Laying on of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. in every part of it is that which is common to all Saints insomuch as he that hath not the Spirit of Christ in these respects may well fear he is none of his On the other side it is evident to all men that Paul in 1 Tim. 4. 14. speaks of the Ministerial Gift Authority or Trust which was committed to Timothy by the consent of the Prophets and by the Laying on of the hands of the Eldership 3. From the Scope of the Apostle in these places respectively for in 1 Tim. 4. 14. Paul is clearly in hand with the matters of Timothies Office vers 11. to the end But in 2 Tim. 1. 6. he speaks to him as he might have spoke to any other Christian Man or Woman for finding him under some Temptation and Fears he comforts him by telling him he hoped his Faith was unfeigned and supports him against Fear by noting that it was not the effect of the Spirit which God gave him by the putting on of his Hands and therefore exhorts him not to be ashamed of the Testimony of the Lord nor of Paul the Lords Prisoner but to be a partaker of the affliction according to the Power of God Then he moves him to consider how free the grace of God was by which he is saved and not to be valued by the works of righteousness which he had done and thus he speaks from vers 1. to vers 13. and then begins to treat of