Heraldry written by Iohn Guillim about fol. 18. That Sisters are allowed no differences of Badges in their Coat-Armour by reason that by them the name of the House cannot be preserved but are admitted to the Inheritance equally and are adjudged but one Heir to all intents and purposes whatsoever And the knowledge of this point in these days is worthy to be enquired into for this is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King can advance to Honour whom he pleaseth And therefore whereas Radulph Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioan the younger married to Sir Humphrey Bowcher who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who married the eldest Sister And Hugh Lupus the first and greatest Earl of Chester Habendum sibi haeredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut iple Rex tenuit Angliam per tenorem Hugh died without Issue and the Inheritance of his Earldom was divided amongst his four Sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto herself If a Woman be Noble by Birth or Descent with whomsoever she doth marry although her Husband be under her Degree yet she doth remain Noble for Birth-right est Character indelebilis Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the Text saith thus viz. Women ennobled with the Honour of their Husbands and with the Kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to pass in the Names of their Husbands and into the House and Surname of their Husbands do we translate them But if afterwards a Woman do marry with a Man of a baser Degree then she loseth her former Dignity and followeth the condition of her latter Husband And concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other Books of the Law do agree for these be Rules conceived in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur It was the Case of Ralph Howard Esq who took to Wife Anne the widow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolk by the Name of Ralph Howard Esq and the Lady Anne Powes his Wife and exception was taken for mis-naming of her because she ought to have been named of her Husband's Name and not otherwise and the Exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God she is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignity shall be changed according to the Degrees of her Husband notwithstanding the Courtesie of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like is also in Queen Maries Reign when the Dutchess of Suffolk took to her Husband Adrian Brook Title Brief 54. 6. And many other Presidents have been of later times And herewith agreeth the Civil Law Digest lib. 1. title q. lege 1. In this Case of acquired Nobility by marriage if question in Law be whereupon an Issue is taken between the Parties that is to say Dutchesses are not Dutchesses Countesses are not Countesses and Baronesses are not Baronesses the Trial whereof shall not be by Record as in the former Case but by a Jury of Twelve men and the reason of the diversity is because in this Case the Dignity is accrued unto her by her Marriage which the Lawyers term Matter in Fact and not by any Record But a Noble Woman by marriage though she take to her second Husband a man of mean Degree yet she may keep two Chaplains according to the Proviso in the Statute of 11. Hen. 8. Case 13. for and in respect of the Honour which once she had viz. at the time of the Retainer And every such Chaplain may purchase Licence and Dispensation c. And Chaplains may not be Non-residents afterwards And forasmuch as the retaining of Chaplains by Ladies of great Estate is ordinary and nevertheless some questions in Law have been concerning the true understanding of the said Statute Law I think it not impertinent to set down subsequent Resolutions of the Judges touching such matters So long as the Wife of a Duke is called Dutchess or of an Earl a Countess and have the fruition of the Honour appertaining to their Estate with kneeling tasting serving so long shall a Baron's Widow be saluted Lady as is also a Knight's Wife by the courtesie of England quamdiâ— matrimonium aut viduitas uxoris durant except she happen to clope with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdom do adjudge that a Woman shall lose her Dowry in that as unto Lands Tenements and Justice so doth the Laws of Gentry and Nobleness give Sentence against such a Woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the Husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her Husband out of her mind subjects her self unto another If a Lady which is married come through the Forest she shall not take any thing but a Dutchess Marchioness or Countess shall have advantage of the Statute de Charta Forest. 12 Artic. during the time that she is unmarried This is a Rule in the Civil Law Si filia Regis nubat alicui Duci vel Comiti ducetur tamen semper regalis As amongst Noble Women there is a difference of Degrees so according to their distinct Excellencies the Law doth give special priviledges as followeth By the Statute 25 Edw. 3. cap. 1. it is High Treason to compass or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the King's Companion The King's Response is a sole person except by the Common Law and she may purchase in Feesimple or make Leases or Grants with the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married Woman can do without her Husband All Acts of Parliament for any cause which any way may concern the Queen are such Statutes whereof the Judges ought to take Recognizances as of general Statutes though the matter doth only concern the capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the Subjects of the Realm for every Subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects within his Laws are divided from the King who is Head and Sovereign so that his business concerns all the Realm and as the Realm hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason is the Queen being his Wife A man seized of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knight's Service some by Priority that is by ancient Feoffment holden of others and some other part holden of the King in posteriority the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queen during her life and afterwards the Tenant dieth his Son within Age in this case he shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himself should have had The Queen Consort or Dowager shall not be amerced if she be Nonsuited
Honour deported themselves after the manner of Military Knights of those days To look further back ancient Histories do take notice of the Amazons of old whose Fame in Arms is sufficiently known Although Noble women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their Sex yet they are in Law Peers of the Realm and all or most of the prerogatives before mentioned which to the Noblemen are belonging do appertain unto them But the Opinion of some men have been That a Countess Baronness and other women of great Estate cannot maintain an Action upon the Statute de Scandalis magnatum because the Statute 2 Rich. 2. speaketh but of Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and of the Chancellor Treasurer Privy Seal Steward of the King's Houshold and other Nobles great Officers of the Realm by which words they conceive that the meanings of the Makers of that Statute was only to provide in that case for Noblemen and not for Noble women Also if any of the King's Servants within the Check-Roll do conspire the death of any Noble woman it is not Felony within the compass of the Statute 3 Hen. 7. 18. Honourable women as before noted are of three sorts by Creation by Descent and by Marriage And the King may create any woman into any Title of Honour at his pleasure and the King by his Letters Patents openly read in Parliament without any other Investure did create Mary Fane Widow the sole Daughter of Baron of Aburgaveny Baronness de le Spencer Noble women by Descent are either those to whom the Lands holden by such Dignity do descend as Heir and they are said to be Honourable by Tenure or by whose worthy Ancestors to whom they were Heirs was seized of an Estate descendable to them in their Titles of Dukedoms Earldoms or Baronies or those whose Ancestors were summoned to Parliament for hereby also Inheritance doth accrew to their Posterities Noble women are also those who do take to their Husbands any Lord or Peer of the Realm although they themselves were not of any degree of Nobility Question and doubt hath been made Whether if a man be summoned to Parliament and afterwards die without Issue Male the Dignity and Title of Honour may descend to the Heir Female And many Arguments have been pro contra in that case which at this time I purposely omit because I have before discoursed thereof in the Chapter of Barons Concerning the Title of Honour descendable to the Heir Female by reason of a Tenure of her Ancestors there needs no more doubt to be made than of Offices of Honour the which do much support the publick wealth and being of Estate of Inheritance do descend to the Heir Female if there be no nearer Heir Male As the Office of High Constableship of England challenged in the time of Henry the Eighth by the Duke of Buckingham and adjudged by the Advise and Resolution of the Judges as by a note of that Case extant whereof Dyer in his Reports hath a memorial 205. b. Kelway the Sixth of Henry the Eighth 170. b. which descended to the Daughter of Humphrey de Bohune Earl of Hereford and Essex as before is declared The Office of the Lord Steward descended to Blaunch Daughter of Henry Earl of Lancaster in whose right Iohn of Gaunt her Husband enjoyed the same The like may be said of the Office of Earl-Marshal which descended by an Heir Female unto the House of Norfolk All which Offices are as unfit to be exercised by a Woman as for a Woman of Honour to be summoned to the Parliament And when a Title of Honour doth descend to a Woman if question in Law do arise between the said Noble woman and any other person whether she be of that Degree of Nobleness or no the Issue shall be tried by the Record thereof and by the King 's Writ it shall be certified and not by a Jury of twelve Men even as it should have been in case her Ancestor had been party Although the Laws of the Realm regularly do make all the Daughters where there are no Sons equally to inherit Lands and Tenements and to be but one Heir to their Ancestor yet it is not so in the descent of Dignity and Titles of Honour for Inheritances concerning matter of Honour being things in their nature participating of Superiority and Eminency are not partable amongst many and therefore must of necessity descend unto one and that is to the eldest Daughter Sister Aunt or Cosin Female and inheritable where there is no Heirs Males that may lawfully challenge the same And so in this point is the Civil Law Nevertheless there was a Judgment in the time of Henry the Third touching the descent of the Earldom of Chester after the death of the Earl who died without Issue his Sisters being his Heirs which Judgment was That the said Earldom should be divided amongst the said Copartners as the other Lands and that the eldest should not have it alone But this Judgment was holden Erroneous even in those times wherein it was given For Bracton a Learned Judge who lived in that Age writeth thereof treating of partition between Copartners lib. 2. Case 24. by which it is evident That Baronies and Dignities of Honour do by the Laws of this Realm descend unto the eldest Copartner and the Judgment given once to the contrary thereof Bracton doth rightly account to be unjust His Reason is notable Forasmuch as the Honour of the Chivalry of this Realm doth chiefly consist in the Nobility Reason would not that such Dignity should be divided amongst Copartners whereby through multitude of partitions the reputation of Honour in such Succession and so divided might be impaired or the strenght of the Realm being drawn into many hands with decrease of livelyhood by such partition should be infeebled In which Resolution Britton the Learned Bishop of Hereford who compiled his Book of the Laws of this Realm by the Commandment and in the Name of Edward the First accordeth Britton 187. And therefore howsoever the Judgment was given or whensoever it is nevertheless very evident that it was soon redressed For if it were given upon the death of Ralph the last of that Name Earl of Chester who died about the Seventh of Henry the Third without Issue the Writers of that time do testifie that the Earldom of Chester came wholly unto Iohn Scott the Son of David Earl of Huntington and Auguish and Maud the eldest Sisters of the said Ralph if it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scott who died about the Four and twentieth of Henry the Third without Issue yet notwithstanding the said Judgment stood in force for that the said King assumed the Earldom into his own Hands upon other satisfaction made to the said Sisters Copartners of the said Iohn Scottâ— Ne tanta haereditas inter colos deduceretur Matth. Paris Monaster Sancti Allane in Crompton fol. 366. b. Nevertheless you may read in this Treatise of
their Tenures were altered viz. Baronia as appeareth in Matthew Paris A. 1070. fol. 66. and of that Tenure have continued ever since as you may read by the Constitutions of Clarendon in the Reign of Henry the Second and in Glanvile and Bracton But the Tenures of all Abbots and Priors were extinguished by the uniting and coming of them to the Crown by the Statute of Dissolution of Monasteries For though the Nobility of England differ in Titles and certain Ceremonies yet a Baron enjoyeth the same priviledges And by experience it is found That Dukes and all other degrees of Nobility in Cases Criminal are tryed by Barons together with Marquisses Earls and Viscounts as their Peers and Peers of the Realm Nobilitas generally is of the word Nosco signifying in common phrases of speech Men of Generosity of Blood and Degree and therefore it is said Vir nobilis idem est quod notus per omnia or a vulgatus But especially it is applyed and used to express the reward of Vertue in honourable measure Ageneris claritate which being in part of distributive Justice remaineth with the highest Soveraign annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm For as Vertue is the gift of none but of God so the reward thereof with Honour cannot be the gift of any but the Supreme Governour being God's Vicegerent on Earth But when Honour and Arms be bestowed upon any if there shall arise contention between Competitors for the same the ancient policy of this Realm hath ordained a Special Court the Judges whereof in all times having been Right Honourable Personages viz. the Lord High Constable and the Earl Marshal and in latter times the Judge thereof only the Earl Marshal The Jurisdiction of the Court consisâ—eth in the Execution of that part of distributive Justice which concerneth the advancement and support of Vertue Nevertheless some men there are not duly considering of what principle and parts the Laws of this Realm do consist have laboured to prove that the Questions and Controversies of Nobility and Arms should not be determined by the Laws of the Realm but by the Civil Law framing to themselves many Arguments to prove the same but being of small value I pass them over The Common Laws as also the Laws of Charity used in the Marshals Court do prohibit any Subject of this Realm to receive Titles of Honour and Dignity by gift or donation from a Forreign Prince King or Emperor for it is a thing greatly touching the Majesty of the King and State of his Kingdom Est vis Majestatis inter insignia summae potestatis And if a man shall bring an Action and in the Writ is styled by such a Forreign Title the Defendant may plead in Abatement of his Writ That he is no Duke Marquis Earl or Baron whereupon if the Plaintiff as demanded take Issue the Issue shall not be tryed by the Jury but by the Records of Parliament wherein he faileth And if any English man be created Earl of the Empire or of any other Forreign Nation and the King also do create him into any Title of Honour in England he shall be named in all Judicial proceedings only by such Name and Title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is And if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then he shall bear the name only of his Baptism and Surname unless he be a Knight For experience teacheth that Kings joyned in League together by certain mutual and as it were natural power of Monarchies according to the Laws of Nations have dismissed one anothers Subjects and Ambassadors graced with the Dignity of Knighthood A Duke of Spain or of another Forreign Nation cometh into England by the King 's safe Conduct in which also the King doth style him Duke according to his Creation nevertheless in all proceedings in the King's Courts he shall not be so stiled by his Title of Dignity And although the said Noble person be also by the King's Letters Patents and by his Forreign Name and Title of Dignity made Denizon for that is the right Name so called because his Legitimation is given to him Or if he be naturalized by Authority of Parliament wherein he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born yet shall he not be styled by his Foreign Titles of Dignity And so it is if a Nobleman of France or elsewhere come into England as Ambassador and by lawful Marriage hath a Son and the Father dieth the Son is by Birth a Natural Englishman yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his Father and the reason thereof is because that Title of Nobility had its Original by a French King and not by any natural Operation which thing is well proved both by Authority of Law and Experience in these days If a Postnaâ—us of Scotland or Ireland who in these days is a Natural Subject to the King of England or if any of his Posterity be the Heirs of a Nobleman of Scotland or Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Alien or Stranger born a Scot be summoned by the King 's Writ to Parliament and therein is styled by his Foreign or other Title whereunto he is invested within England by the King 's Grant then and from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judicial and Legal Proceedings he ought to be so styled and by no other Name And it was the Case of Gilbert Humfrevile Earl of Angus in Scotland of it appertaineth to the Royal Prerogative of the King to call and admit an Alien born to have place and voice in his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and that for great and weighty Considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a Stranger born question do arise and the Issue be whether he is of that Title or no it may well be tryed by the Record which is the only lawful tryal in that Case But there is a Diversity worthy of Observation for the highest and lowest Degrees are universal and therefore a Knight Engglish or Stranger born is a Knight in all Nations in what place soever he received his Title and Dignity and so ought of right and by Law to be named in the King's Courts as aforesaid Also if the Emperor the King of Denmark or other Foreign King come into this Realm by safe conduct as he ought for a Monarch or absolute Prince though he be in League cannot come without the King's Licence and safe Conduct but any Subject to such a Foreign King in League may come without Licence In this Case he shall sue and be sued by the Name of Emperor or King or else the Writ shall abate There is a notable President cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the King's Court of Marshalsea it is said And these things he might
as many have made the like then may such Isâ—ue Male together with the Barony be it Caâ—â—e Honour or Mannor so holdâ—n hold and lawâ—ully enjoy the Name Style Title and Dignity of a baron Moreover concerning the second Objection It is very true that many ancient Mannors which were in times past holden by Barony are now in the hands of Gentlemen mean and ignoble by blood who neither do or may claim any Nobility or Honour thereby But there hath been some former Gifts made by the King's Progenitors to such as they honoured in augmentation and support of their Honour and for honourable Services should thus come to the hands of mean personages are twosold First For that such Mannors have been aliened by Licence unto such persons before spoken of whom such Possessions alone cannot make Noble Secondly And that was usually such Mannors as were in ancient time holden by Barony that have upon divers occasions come to the Crown were extinct and after the same Lands were given or conveyed to others reserving other Services than those which at the first were due â—or the same so that it was no marvel that some Mannors anciently holden by Barony or other honourable Service should now be holden in Soccage or by other mean Tenure As to that which was thirdly Objected That some ancient Barons there are which have aliened and sold away those Castles and Mannors of which they have and do bear the Name and Dignity and yet still themselves do retain and lawfully keep the Dignity and Degree of a Baron and have been and are called to Parliament notwithstanding such alienation To that I Answer That it is true but it proveth nothing against the former Resolution and therefore for better satisfaction of this point it is to be considered that either such Barons are original Barons by Writ or Barons by Tenure Barons by Writ in this respect now in hand are of two kinds for either in such Writ whereby they are or their Ancestors were first summoned they were only named by their own Names or else there was addition given them of the principal place of their abode which was done for distinction sake either to sever them from some honourable person of the same Name or else to give them such honourable Title by addition of the place which place notwithstanding was not holden by Barony And therefore if such a Baron do alien away that place which was antiently his Seat he may nevertheless retain his honourable Title no respect had of such place But if a Baron by Tenure do alien away the Honour Castle or Mannor holden by Barony unto a mean person not capable of Honour and by sufficient Licence so to do and after the Alienor which made such Alienation be called by Writ to Parliament under the Title or as a Baron to such Honour Castle or Mannor so aliened that away which he held by Barony But thenceforth after such Writ of Summons he is become a Baron by Writ such Alienation notwithstanding forasmuch as the Writ directeth at the pleasure of the Prince doth give unto him that Addition of Name and Dignity And thus much touching the Resolution of the said Question and satisfaction of the said Objections and of Barons by Tenure CHAP. XI Barons by VVrit which is the second kind of Barons mentioned in the former Division of Barons A Baron by Writ is he unto whom a Writ of Summons in the Name of the King is directed to come to the Parliament appointed at a certain time and place to be holden and there with his Majesty the Prelates and Nobility to treat and advise about the weighty affairs of the Nation which Writ is much to the effect of the aforementioned Writ in the Title of Earl and which kind of Writ is as well directed to the Barons of Tenure as by Creation by Patents But those that are not Barons by Tenure nor by Patent and have only such Writs after the receipt of such Writ and place taken in Parliament accordingly ought to enjoy the Name and Dignity of Barons Touching the Antiquity of Barons by Writ only and the first institution thereof I find little or no mention before the Reign of King Henry the Third and therefore I conceive that either the first or at least the first frequent use of such Barons was had and devised 49 Hen. 3. in case of necessity and upon a commendable occasion For in the disorder between the King and his Nobility in those troublesome Wars where Seditions and Rebellions were stirred up by them against the said King there were many great Battels fought to the effusion of much Blood of which said Rebellions the Right Honourable Simon Earl of Exeter was Ring-leader for the Defence of their Liberties as pretended granted by Magna Charta and Charter of the Forest which are even to this day the principal Grounds of the positive Law and are the most ancient Statutes now in use amongst us And for the defence of other Constitutions and Ordinances then made at Oxford And after divers Fields sought betwixt them at Northampton Rochester Lewes and other places last of all was the Catastrophe of that Tragedy finished at Eveshalm or Easam in Worcestershire where the said Earl was slain the King gained the Victory and the rebellious Barons received their overthrow Upon which presently ensued the Parliament holden at Winchester in Hantshire and afterwards at Westminster where such of the Barons as were slain in the Field against the King and such others of them as were taken Prisoners or made their escape by flight were to be attainted and disinherited of their Estates And the Number of Barons who had continued faithful unto their Soveraign being small it was deemed a necessary policy to supply the number of the diminished Barons with other persons of known worth wisdom and repute by reason whereof there were called at those Parliaments the Abbots and Priors of the Realm as well those that held not by Barons as others and divers others of the most worthy Laity not holding by Barony and these by means thereof were thenceforth Barons by Writ but certain of the said Abbots and Priors which held not by Barony and thought it a burthen to their Houses got themselves upon Petition afterwards to be exempted as by divers Records thereof remaining in the Chancery may appear This moreover is to be noted concerning the Writ of Summons to Parliament that those Writs in form of their directions are divers some directed by special Name of Barons as Rex c. Edmundo Baroni de Stafford Iohanni Baroni de Graystock Iohanni Baroni de Dudley Edwardo Nevill Baroni Abergaveny as it was in the Reign of King Iames. Some other are summoned by Name of the party with addition of the place as Iohanni Strange de Knocking Militi Edwardo Gray de Groby Militi Iohanni le Scroop de Masham Militi Willielmo Souch de Harringworth Militi the chief Castle or Mannor of such
There is none of the Nobility but have sufficient Freehold which the Plaintiffs may extend for their payment or satisfaction But a Capias or Exigit lieth against a Knight for the Law hath not that Opinion of his Freehold And if any of the Nobility happen to be so wilful and not to appear the Court will compel the Sheriff to return great Issues against him and so at every default to encrease the issues as lately against the Earl of Lincoln hath been in practice By the ancient Laws of this Realm before the coming of William the Conqueror many good Laws were made for keeping the Peace and amongst others That all above the age of twelve years should be sworn to the King which we in remembrance thereof do keep at this day in the view of Frank Pledge or the Court Leet But Noblemen of all sorts are neither bound to attend the Court Leet nor to take the Oath as appeareth by Britan. c. 29. treating of the Court called the Sheriffs Tourn out of which the Leet to be extracted And agreeable thereunto is the Statute of Marlbridge cap. 10. See the Lord Chancellor's Speech in the case of Postnati fol. 78. If a Writ of Error be brought in Parliament upon a Judgment given in the King's Bench the Lords of the higher House alone without the Commons are to examine the Errors ibid. fol. 22. In the 11 th of Henry the Fourth fol. 26. in a Case concerning a Distress taken for Expences and Fees the Knights of the Parliament are not contributary for such Lands as are parcel of their ancient Lordships and Baronies but for other Lands they are But there is a Question made If one which is no Baron but ignoble do purchase any ancient Barony whether he shall be discharged of such Expences and Fees or not Which is not worthy the questioning For as Land holden by Villainous Service doth not make him a Villain or Bondman which being free doth purchase the same although by his Tenure he shall be bound to do such Villainous Service So on the other side Land that is holden by Barony doth not make the Villain or Ignoble which purchaseth the same to be Noble although the charge of such Tenure do lye upon him in respect of the Service of the Realm It is said in our Books That a day of Grace or by the favour of the Court is not to be granted to the Plaintiff in any Suit or Action whereby a Nobleman is Defendant because thereby a Nobleman should be longer delayed than the ordinary course of the Court is and such a Lord is to have expedition of Justice in respect that he is to attend the person of the King and the Service of the Commonwealth But if there be no Noble person to the Suit the Judges do and may at their discretion upon a motion grant a day more of Grace otherwise than by the strict course of the Law the Plaintiff may challenge Cambden f. 169. writing upon this Subject saith Where a Nobleman is Demandant the Defendant may not be assoyned for the delay and cause aforesaid To which I could also subscribe but that the Book in the fifth of Hen. 4. 15. b. is otherwise adjudged There the King brought a Quare Impedit against a common person and the Defendant was essoyned by a Rule of Court If any Peer of the Realm be Plaintiff or Defendant in any Action real or personal a-against any other whereupon any Issue is to be tryed by a Jury the Sheriff must return one Knight at the least to be of the Inquest otherwise upon challenge made the whole pannel shall be quashed Which by order of the Law is appointed to be done for honour and reverence due to the person of that degree For when a Peer of the Realm is party it is otherwise than when the Suit is between private persons F. N. B. Title Challenge 115. 13. Edward the Third in a Quare Impedit against a Bishop adjudged But the Earl of Kent in the fourteenth year of the late Queen's Reign and the parties did plead to an Issue the Venire Facias is awarded which the Sheriff did return â—â—rved and a pannel returned accordingly in which is no Knight named The truth of which Case was that after the return made the Demand is published and demanded by the Queen and the Heralds to be Earl of Kent in right and discent although he had not been so reputed or named before and also after that time that is to say at the then last Parliament the Tenant is made a Baron by Writ of Parliament and then the Jury doth appear in the Court of Common Pleas and the Earl of Kent did challenge the Array because no Knight was returned but it was not allowed him by the Court for the admittance of both parties is to the contrary and no default can be laid to the Sheriff for he had no notice of the honourable Esâ—ate of either of the parties the Demandant not being then known or reputed to be an Earl by descent or of the Tenant then also being no Baron How much the Common Law hath always prohibited perpetuity in Lands and Tenements you may see in Corbet's Case in the first part of Coke's Book fol. 48. and in many other Cases in the rest of his Books As also Littleton fol. 145. saith it is a principle in the Law that every Land in Feesimple may be charged with a Rent But if the King's Majesty upon a Creation of any Peer of the Realm of what degree soever do as the manner is by Letters Patent give unto any such new created Nobleman an Annuity or Rent for the support of his degree which they call Creation-money this is so annexed to the dignity that by no Grant Assurance or any manner of Alienation it can be given from the Lord but is still incident and a support of the same Creation In all Cases wherein is any Suit a Baron or Peer of the Realm is to be amerced no less than five pounds but the amercement of a Duke is One hundred pounds Although the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 14. be in the Negative viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti yet use hath reduced it into a certainty As also by the same Statute it appeareth that such Amercements should be assessed per pares suos but that it were troublesome to assemble Barons for so small a matter such Amercements in times past have been assessed by the Barons of the Exchequer who sometime were Barons of the Realm as is already taken notice of and so writeth Bracton lib. 3. tract cap. 1. fol. 116.8 Whereas by Statute 32 Hen. 8. cap. 16. it is enacted That the Subjects of this Realm shall not keep in their Houses or Families above the number of four Strangers born nevertheless by a Proviso in the same Act every Lord of the Parliament hath this
and is equal in power to a King as before noted She is her Husband 's Sovereign and he her Subject in England although he were an Emperor So was King Philip of Spain to Queen Mary and her Authority is included in the foregoing Chapter of Monarchy and therefore need not to be here repeated The second in Honour is the Queen Consort and the third the Queen Dowager or Queen Mother As from the benign influence of the glorious Planet the Sun all Creatures by God's decree in the order of Nature receive life and motion so from the King God's Vicegerent on earth all degrees of Nobility take their advance and dignity 'T is therefore requisite the King should as far excel his Subjects in Majesty and Splendor as doth the Sun the other Planets And as the Moon is the mirror of the Sun representing his Glory by Night so the Queen Consort the Counterpart of the Royal Majesty shines amongst us for whom and for whose Posterity the Nation is bound to send up their Prayers to God The Queen of England during the life of the King hath as high prerogatives and priviledges and liveth in as great state as any Queen in Europe She is reputed the second person in the Kingdom and the Law setteth so high a value upon her as to make it High Treason to conspire her death or to violate her Chastity She is allowed Regal Robes Ornaments and a Crown of the same form as an absolute Queen weareth and may be as formerly they were crowned with Royal Solemnity the performance of which Office properly belongeth to the Archbishop of York And although their Coronations of late have been disused yet they have as much honour and enjoy the same priviledges as if that Ceremony had been done And the manner and solemnity at the Coronation of a Queen is at large set down in most of our Chronicles and in particular in Holinshead and Stow upon the splendid Coronation of Anna Bulloign in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth to which I refer the Reader The Queen is permitted to sit in state by the King and to keep a distinct Court from the King 's although she be the Daughter of a Nobless and hath her Courtiers in every Office as hath the King though not altogether so many and hath her Yeomen of her Guard to attend her on foot and within doors and her Lifeguard of Horse for her state and security when she goeth abroad She hath her Attorney Solicitor and Counsel for the management of her Law concerns who have great respect shewed them being placed within the Barr with the King's Counsel in all Courts of Judicature Although she be an Alien and a Feme covert during the King's Life yet without any Act of Parliament for Naturalization or Letters Patents for her Denization she may purchase Lands in Feesimple make Leases in her own Name without the King hath power to give to sue and to contract Debts which by the Law is denied any other Feme Covert she may not be impleaded till first petitioned nor is the formality of fifteen days Summons to the Defendant needful if she be Plaintiff nor can she be amerced if she be Nonsuited in any Action she may present by her self to a Spiritual Benefice Anciently the Queens had a Revenue called Aurum Reginae that is the Queen's Gold which was the tenth part of what came to the King by the name of Oblata upon Pardons Gifts c. but of late they keep to their Dowry viz. Forty thousand pounds per Annum besides fines upon the renewing of Leases which said Dowry is as large as any Queens in Christendome The like honour and respect that is due to the King is exhibited to the Queen as well by Foreigners as by the King's Subjects as is also to the Queen Dowager who looseth not her Dignity or Reverence although she should marry a private Gentleman as did Queen Kathâ—rine Widow to King Henry the Fifth who after she was married to Owen Teudor Esquire maintained her Action at Law as Queen of England The present Queen Consort is the thrice Illustrious Donna Katherina Infanta Portuguesa whose vertue and true piety ought to be taken notice of in all Histories â—or succeeding Queens to trace her Noble footsteps whom God preserve The Queen Dowager takes place next to the Queen Consort and in the absence of the King her Son or in his minority is sometimes made Queen Regent or Protectress but this trust is usually by the King 's own command or at the request of the three States assembled in Parliament to prevent the danger of an usurpation of the Crown the like trust is sometimes imposed upon the Queen Consort in her Husband's absence as by King Henry the Eighth twice during his Wars in France Note That during the minority of the King of England whatsoever Laws are enacted in Parliament under a Queen Regent or a Protectress are no longer binding than till the King attains to full age after which he may revoke and make void by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal The Daughters of the Kings of England are all styled Princeâ—â—es The eldest is called the Princess Royal and hath an aid or certain rate of money paid by every Tenant in Capite Knights Service and Soccage towards her marriage Portion as was levied by K. Iames when he married the Princess Elizabeth and to violate her Chaâ—â—ity is by the Law adjudged High Treason Of Noble VVomen WOmen in England according to their Husbands Qualities are either Honourable and Noble or Ignoble Their Honourable Dignities are Princesses Dutchesses Marchionesses Countesses Viscountesses and Baronesses The Nobless as the French call them are all Knights Ladies who in all writings are styled Dames all Esquires and Gentlemens wives only Gentlewomen The third sort comprehends the Plebeans and are commonly called Goodwives Noble women are so by Creation Descent or Marriage Of women honourable by Creation are divers Examples of which the first as I remember that we read of was Margaret Countess of Norfolk created by Richard the Second Dutchess of Norfolk And many of them had their Honours granted by Patents to themselves and the Heirs Males of their Bodies to be begotten with special Clauses that their Heirs Male shall have voices in Parliament Creation money their Mothers Titles as if a Dutchess he a Duke and if a Countess he an Earl with the Ceremony of Mantle Surcoat Coronet c. The like Grant was to Anna Bulloign when she was created Marchioness of Pembroke by Henry the Eighth Of a later date was the Lady Finch made Countess of Winchelsey who had all the said priviledges granted to her and her Heirs Male The Dutchess of Buckingham also in the time of King Iames. And in our Age we have divers Noble Ladies advanced to degrees of Honour viz. the Countess of Guilford Groom of the Stool to the Queen Mother and a faithful Servant to her in her banishment being
then Countess of Killimeak in Ireland The Lady Dudley Dutchess of 〈…〉 The celebrated Beauties Barbara Villiers Dutchess of Cleaveland and Countess of Southampton and Louyse Rene Angelique de Carwell Dutchess of Portsmouth Countess of Petersfield c. Of Titles by Descent and Marriage there are Examples enough so that I need not trouble the Reader with any repetition I shall only set down some few general Observations not sufficiently discoursed of If a King's Daughter marry a Duke or an Earl illa â—emper dicitur Regalis by Law and Courtesie Noble women by descent Birthright or Creation remain Noble although they marry Husbands under that degree Also any Daughter of an Earl or Viscount that continues a Virgin or marrieth an Esquire yet she retaineth the Honour that sprung from her Parents and shall take place accordingly and be saluted by the Title of Lady If a Gentleman Knight or Peer marry a wife of ignoble Parents she shall enjoy the Title Name and Dignity of her Husband not only during his life but when she is a widow or afterwards married to an Ignoble person but this is by the Courtesie and not by the Law of the Realm Whereas on the contrary let a woman of Blood and Coat-Armour marry a Yeoman or Churle that is Ignoble and hath no Coat-Armour his Condition in point of Honour is in no respect advanced and she shall retain the Honour State and Dignity she was born unto Yet if she have iâ—â—ue by that Yeoman or Ignoble person she being an Heiress that Issue shall have liberty to bear her Coat but Sir Iohn Fern saith only for life and that on a Lozenge Shield with a difference of a Cinquefoil If a French Spanish or other woman Alien be married to a Peer of the Realm or to a Gentleman and be not denizened she is debarred all Priviledges and Titles due to her Husband nor can she claim any Dower or Joynture from him by the Laws of England Yet in some things our Laws are wonderful kind to the Female Sex especially procreandi causa As thus if a man and his wife separate for some fraud or private loathing of the Marriage Bed or the like and so continue for some years after which time the woman bringeth forth a Child which though got by another man and her Husband in all that time not having enjoyed her yet if he live in the Kingdom he must Father the Child and if before that time he had no Child that shall inherit his Lands if entailed or left without Will Also if a Wife be with Child when her Husband dieth and she marry another man before her delivery the latter Husband must own the Child which must be his Heir at Law if he were childless The Wives Dignities and Lands descend to her Heirs not to her Husband yet to encourage him to play the man the Courtesie of England is such that as the Wife hath the third part of his Estate in Lands for her Joynture during her life if a Widow so the Husband if he get his Wife with Child and that Child be heard to cry he shall enjoy all her Lands during his life The Wife can make no contract whatsoever that shall stand good in Law to the detriment of her Husband without his consent nor can she make a Will or dispose of what she hath whilst she is a Feme Covert â—he cannot be produced as a witness for or against her Husband nor shall she be accessory to his felonious acts although she receive the Goods or conceive the Fact if she be not personally an Actor therein Female Children are also by Law capable to give their consent to marriage at Seven years old and the Lord 's eldest Daughter is to have aid of his Tenants to marry her at that age though she may dissent from this Contract when she comes to Twelve but if at that Age she doth not dissent she is bound for life she may then make a Will and dispose of Goods and Chattels by it At Nine years of Age she is Dowable at Fourteen she might receive her Lands into her Hands and was then out of Wardship if she were Fourteen at the death of her Ancestor otherwise she was in Wardship till she accomplished Sixteen years and then she was free At One and twenty she is enabled to contract or alienate her Lands by Will or otherwise If there be no Son the Lands as well as Goods are equally divided amongst the Daughters who are Coheirs In ancient times Women amongst the Romans were thought worthy of enjoying peculiar favours and respect And out of their great love and honour to the Mother of Marcus Coriolanus for diverting his fury which he threatned the Citizens to their ruin for their ingratitude towards him the Citizens granted the Roman Dames the priviledge of wearing the Segmenta Aurea or Bordures of Gold and purple on their Garments They were also permitted to wear gold Ear-rings to have place on the way and in memorial of the said preservation there was erected a Temple dedicated to the Female Fortune Anne of Britain wife to Charles the Eighth of France as an ornamental Honour to several deserving Ladies instead of the Military Belt and Collar bestowed on them a Cordon or Lace and admonishing them to live chastly and devoutly and to put the greater esteem thereon the surrounded her Escocheon of Arms with the like Cordon from which Example it is now become the Custome for unmarried women to bear their Arms in form of a Lozenge which are commonly adorned with such a Cordon Ioseph Micheli Marquez for the further Honour of the Female Sex gives an Example of the Noble women of Tortosa in Aragon whom he calls Cavalleros or Knights For saith he Don Raymond last Earl of Barcellona who by right of his wife Petronilla sole Daughter and Heir to King Ramiro the Monk joyned his Principality to the Kingdom of Aragon having in the year 1149. taken from the Moors the City of Tortosa who in a few months after laid siege to the said City and reduced the Inhabitants to so great a strait that their intentions were of surrendring it up to the Moors but the women hearing thereof for the diverting their ruin put on mens Apparel and by a resolute Sally forced the Moors to raise the Seige And the Earl in acknowledgment of his thanks for this their Noble Act as a reward of Honour instituted an Order not much unlike a Military Order into which were admitted only those brave women and their Descendants The Badge which he assigned them was something like a Fryer's Capouch but of a crimson colour which they wore upon their Head-clothes Amongst the priviledges which this Earl granted them they were to be freed from all Taxes to have precedency of men in publick Meetings and that all the Iewels and Apparel of their deceased Husbands should be their own although of never so great value And these women having thus purchased this
Master thereof which he did a little before his Coronation in the City of Burgos in great Solemnity the whole Night being spent in the Monastery of St. Mary Royal in watching and prayer and the day following after Mass they were invested with a red Ribon of about three Inches broad which went cross their left Shoulders like our Knights of the Bath being the Badge from whence these Knights took their Name Their Articles are at large set down by Sir William Segar which being too many to repeat are here omitted Knights of the Dove in Castile THIS Order according to Favin was first instituted by Iohn the first King of Castile about the year 1379. in the City of Segovia The Collar of this Order was composed of peeces which represented the figure of the Sun in his Glory to which hung a golden Dove enamelled white and encircled with rayes But the King dying the same year and before it was well received it became of no great esteem Ordo de la Scama in Castile JOHN the second King of Castile for the stirring up his Nobles to assist him in his Wars against the Moors in Anno 1420. did erect this order which took so good effect that in a short time the Moors were subdued Their Ensign according to Ios. Micheli was a Cross composed of Scales of Fâ—shes from which it seemeth to have took its Name for Scama in the Spanish signifies the Scale of a Fish These Knights were obliged to fight against the Moors to accompany the King in the Wars and to die in the defence of the Christian Religion Their Rules and Statutes for their Government were ordained by the said King upon whose death this Order lost much of its splendor Knights of the Lilly in Aragon THIS Order was erected by Ferdinand King of Aragon in Anno 1403. and dedicated to the honour of the blessed Virgin in token of a signal Victory which this King obtained against the Moors The Collar was composed of Bough-pots fill'd with white Lillies interlaced with Griffons Knights of Mount-joy THIS Order was first instituted in the Holy Land for the securing these parts against the Moors and Sarazens and lay in Garison in a Castle built on the point of a Mountain near Ierusalem And after the loss of the Holy Land these Knights retired into Spain and performed good Service against the Moors but in process of time this Order fell to decay and were incorporated into the Order of Calatrava Their Habit was a red short Mantle and on their Breasts they wore a white Star with five Rayes They observed the Rule of St. Benedict which afterwards was changed to that of St. Augustine and vowed Poverty Chastity and Obedience Knights of Acon or Acres IN the City of Acon these Knights resided where they used all Duties of Charity to Pilgrims that went to the Holy Land They assumed the exercise of Arms in imitation of the Knights Hospitallers They followed the Rule of St. Augustine and wore a black Garment whereon was a white Cross Pattee but Ios. Micheli Marquez saith it was a red Cross and in the midst thereof stood the figures of St. Iohn and St. Thomas After the City of Acon was taken they removed into Spain where they flourished receiving great favour from Alphonsus the Astrologer K. of Castile but after his death by little and little they decayed and in the end were united to the Knights Hospitallers Knights of St. James in Galicia THIS Order of Knighthood called by the Spaniards Cavalieri di san Iago is of great esteem amongst them and was first erected upon this occasion When the Arabians had almost subdued the Country the remainder of the Spanish people refusing to live under the Obedience of so barbarous a Nation retired unto the Mountains of Asturia where they settled a Government and after their abode there some few years certain Nobles or Gentlemen of great quality to the number of Thirteen upon a serious consultation to regain their Country resolved to enter into a Fraternity and to begin a War against the Moors and Barbarians The Ensign which they wore was a red Cross in form of a Sword with an Escallop Shell on it in imitation of the Badge of the Pilgrims that go to Ierusalem to the Sepulchre of St. Iames the Apostle They elected one chief Governour who was called Great Master who with the Thirteen other Knights had power to choose or remove any Knight at their discretion and to make Statutes and Orders for the well Government of the said Society at their Day of Meeting which is Annually on the Feast day of All-Saints in great State having large Revenues to support their Grandure this Order being esteemed the chiefest in Spain Knights of St. Saviour in Aragon DON Alphonso for his better enabling to force the Moors out of Aragon about the year of our Lord 1118. did erect this Order electing a certain number which he chose out of those Spanish and French Nobles that assisted him in his Wars against the Moors which Honour engaged them to pursue the War against them the more vigorously The Moors being subdued King Alphonso established these Knights in the place of the Knights Templars in Montreal and had a rule of living somewhat conformable unto them save only to marry and were obliged to support and defend the Holy Church and Christian Faith against the Moors Their Habit was a white Mantle and on their Breast they wore a red Cross. But when the Moors were expelled being the chief end for which they were instituted these Knights were laid aside or at leastwise not regarded and their Revenues joyned to the Crown Knights of St. Julian de Pereyro or of Alcantara THese Knights take their name from the place of their Institution viz. the City of Alcantara in Castiglia seated on the Tago where they had a stately Church and were richly endowed They had many Priviledges and Orders observed amongst them their Habit was a black Garment having on the Breast a green Cross and their first great Master was Ferdinando the Second King of Leon and Galicia about the year of our Lord 1176. Knights of Calatrava in Castile THIS ancient Order was first instituted by Don Sanchio the third King of Toledo about the year of Christ 1158. and took its Name from the Castle Calatrava which is a Frontire both of Toledo and Castile which place the Moors took upon their Victory they obtained against Don Rodrigro King of Spain in Anno 714. but after above Four hundred years continuance they were forced thence and the place given to the Knights Templars by Don Alphonso Emperor of Spain to be maintained as a Garison against the Incursion of the Moors but they not being able to maintain and defend it withdrew their Garison upon which lest the Moors should become Masters of it again the King by his Charter gave the said Castle and Village to one Don Raymund formerly a Knight of great Fame and
Gouernor of Plimouth who wa◠〈◊〉 of Honor to his maty in his exile now 〈◊〉 yeâ—â—oomes of 〈◊〉 Bedchamberâ— Captaine in his Foot Guards 〈◊〉 Mariet of Whitchurch in Warwickshire of 〈◊〉 Prâ—ston in Glocestershire Esq maried one of th◠〈◊〉 and hâ—yrâ—s of Sr. Richard Brawnâ— of 〈◊〉 in the said County of Glocester Knight Walter Chetwynd of Ingestre in ye. County of Stafford Esq Samuel Pepys of Brampton in Huntinâ—â—tonshire Esq Secretary of the Admiralty his maty King Charles the Second Descendeâ— of the antient family of Pepys of Cottenham in Cambridgâ—â— â—â—hn Georges of Bawton in Glocestershire Esq a member of the Honourable house of Comons for this present Parliament 1677 descended the antient and Worthy family of the Georges of Cicester in the said County Iohn Butler D. D. Chaplain in ordinary to his 〈◊〉 King Charles the 2d. and Canon of Windsor marâ—â— Susanna one of the daughters of Sr. Edward Thomas of Lamihangle in Glamorganshire Bart. â—â—ptaine Iohn Loggan of Idbury in Oxfordshirâ— and of Bassetsbury in Comâ— Bucks Maried Mary Sole Daughter and heire of Hugh Dâ—rrell of Millend in the said County of Buckinghaâ— Gent. Henry Pilkington of Stanton in the County of Derby Esqr. George Bowen Esqr. lineally descended from and present heire unto the antient family of the Bowens of Courthouse in the seigniory of Gower in Glomorganshire Henry Gilbert son and heyre of Henry Gilbert of Lockoe in Derbyshire Esqr. by Elizabeth daughter and Coeheyre of Sr. Iohn Barnard of Abington in Northamptonshire Knight Iohn Colwall of the Inner Temple London Esqr. Samuel Sanders son heyre apparent of Thomas Sanders of Ireton in Derbyshire Esqr. which maried Margaret daughter and Coeheyre of Evers Armyne of Osgodby in the County of Lincolne Esqr. Richard Goodlad of the Citty of London Esqr. Lewis Inkledon of Buckland in the Parish of Branton in the County of Devon Esqr. Thomas Rawlins of Langarran in the County of Hereford Esqr. Colonell Titus of Bushy in the County of Herâ—ford one of the Groomes of his matys Bedchamber c. Thoâ— Dereham Esq of the antient family of Dereham at Dereham in Norfolk Servant to his Majesty King Charles the 2d. Eâ—an Seqâ— of Boverton in the County of Glaâ—morgan sergeant at Law of which Coat and family see more in the body of the Booke Section 6. Chapter â— â—ndrew Lant of Thorp vnderwood alias Thorp Billâ—â— in Northamptonshire Esq son of Robert Lant of London Merchant by Elizabeth Daughter heyre of Rich Andrews of Thorp vnderwooâ—â—â—â—resaid Gent. which said Andrew Lant is now maried to Iudith◠〈◊〉 daughter of Will Vannam of London Esq Iohn Darnall of the Middle Temple London Esqr. now maried to Mary daughter of William Bacon of St. Clements Danes in Middlesex Esqr. Gabriel Armiger of North Creakâ— in the County of Norfolk and of the Inner Temple London Esq â— William Dutton Colt Esq r son of George Colt of Colt Hall in Suffolk Esq r by Elizabeth daughter and Coheyre of Iohn Dutton of Sherbourn in Glocestershire Esqr. which said William is now maried to Lucy sole daughter of Thomas Webb of in Kent Esqr. Randolph Egerton of Betley in Staffordshire Esqr. first Leivtenant and Major of his Matâ—s owne Troop of Guards under the comand of his grace Iames Duke of Monmouth first maried to Penelope daughter of the Rt. honble Rob viscount Kilmurrey of the Kingdome of Ireland and now to Eiliz â—aughter and heyre of Henry Murrey Esq r one of the Gent of his Matis Bed-chamber to K. Charles the first by Ann now viscountess Banning Iohn Wildman of Beaucot alias Becket in the County of Berks Esqr. Nathan Knight of Ruscombe in Berkshire Esq r intermariat â—th Margaret Eldest daughter and Coheire of William Stroode of Ruscombe Aforesaid Esqr. William Petyt of the Inner Tâ—mple London Esq r and Silvester Petyt Genâ— Brother to the Sd. Wm. descâ—ndeâ—â— by Gilbert a Younger sonn of Sr. Iohn Petytâ— From â—â— Antient family of that name who were Lords of Ardever in Cornwall tempore H. â— Iohn Lamphigh of Lamplugh in Cumberland Esqr. Collonell of a foot Regiment at Marston Moore in Yorkshire under the Command of his Highâ—ness Prince Rupert of wch Family see more in the body of the Bookeâ— section 2d. Chapt â— Thomas Burton of the City of London Esq Thomas Madden of the Inner Temple London Esâ— desâ—ended of ye. Maddens Formerly of Muddenton in Milâ—shire who are now seated at Rousky Castle in 〈◊〉 County of Fermanaugh in the Kingdome of 〈◊〉 Godwin Swift of Gooderidge in the County of Hereford Esq one of the society of Graâ—s Inn descend of the Family of ye. Swists of York-shire Henry Raâ—â—sford B. D and Rector of Stanmoâ—e Magna in the County of Midd Maried Mary one of ye. Daughters of Iohn Montfort of Jewing in ye. County of Hartford D. D. Residentiary of St Pauls London Nathaniel Stoughton of St. Iohns near Warwick in Warwick shire Esq lineally descended from the antient family of the Stâ—ughtons of Stoughton in Surrey now maried to Ann daughter and heyre of Will Brough late Deane of Glocester deceased of this family see more in the body of the booke Section 6. Chap 1. Capt. Iohn Clifford of Frampton upon Severne in Glocestershire whose family have there continued ever since the Reigne of Will the Conqueror takeing its rise from Puntins a noble man of Normandy who came into England with the said Will whose second sonn Osbert held the said Frampton and from whom for want of issue it descended to Walter de Clifford the predecessor of the said Iohn of wch Coate and family see more in the body of the booke section 5. Chapter 4. Richard Booth of the Citty of London Esqr. descended from the Booth's of Witton in Warwickshire now maried to Elizabeth daughter of Iohn Hopcroft Cittizen of London Thomas Stephens Esq r only son and heyre of S. Tho. Stephens of little Sodbury in Glocestershire Kt now liveing whose Grandfather Tho Stephens was Attourney Generall to Prince Henâ— and after his decease to K. Charles the first when Prince of Wales in wch service he dyed of this family see more in the body of the booke section 3. chap. 20. William Iollife of Carswall Castle in Stafford shire Esqr. who first maried Martha eldest daughter of Thomas Foley of Witley Court in Worcestershire Esq r and now the Lady Mary Hastings daughter of the Rt. honble Ferdinando late Earle of Huntington Henry Arthington of Arthington in the west Rideing of York shire Esq â— Thomas Modyford of Easttuar in the County of Kent Esqrâ— Collonell of a Regiment of Foot at Port Royall in the Island of Iamaica sonn and heyre of Sr. Tho. Modyford Bart. late Governor of the Sd. Island Erasmus Smith alias Herâ—â— of St. Iones in the parish of Clarkenwell in Midd Esqr. sonn of Sr. Roger Smith of Edmonthorp in Leicestershire Kt. decâ—ased descended from the antient family of the Smiths of Withcock in the s â— County â—câ— S
all true Wisdom And therefore our wise and religious Ancestors called to their General Council or Wittengemote or Court of Wisemen as they called it those chief and principal persons of the Clergy which by their places and professions by their Gravities Learning and Wisdom might best advise them what was the Law of God's acceptable will and pleasure that they might frame Laws answerable or at least wise not contrary and repugnant thereunto And touching the Temporal Barons by Tenure mention is made of them in the Books of Law Records and ancient Monuments of the Realm and these Baronies were anciently uncertain and rentable at the pleasure of the King But such incertainty was brought to certainty by the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 2. Bracton doth make express mention of Barons Temporal by Tenure it shall be needful here again to remember the former assertion of Bracton That the head of a Barony descending to Daughters should not be divided by partition which argueth likewise the Tenure of Barony But let us descend to other Authority viz. the Book-Case in the 48 Edw. 3. fol. 30. Sir Ralph Everdon's Case by which Case of Law 't is most evidently proved that there are Barons by Tenure which in regard of such their Tenure ought to be summoned to Parliament And furthermore That there were or are Barons by Tenure read the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 41. where the Fees of the Earl-Marshal and the Lord Chamberlain are expressed which are to be taken by them upon the Homage done of every Baron by Tenure whether the Baron holdeth by a whole Barony or by a less But here ariseth a Question If a Baron by Tenure alien and grant away the Honour Castle and Mannor holden by Barony whether shall such Alien or Grauntee take upon him the State Title and Dignity of a Baron or not Or what shall become of such Dignity of Baronage after such Alienation and Grant made They which do deny that there are any such Baronies by Tenure do use these as their principal Motives or Reasons First If there be any Baronies by Tenure then the Alience or Grantee of such Honour Castle and Mannor so holden must hold by the same Tenure that his Grantor or Feoffer before held but that was by Barony therefore such Grantee must hold by Barony And if such Grant or Alienation be made to persons Vulgar or Ignoble then should such Tenure be made Noble which were very absurd and full of inconveniency for Ornanda potius est dignitate domus quam ex domo dignitas utcunque quibus quaerenda est ab iis honestanda Milles peroration 3. Secondly It is very evident and manife stthat many ancient Mannors which in old time were holden by Baronage and were the head of Baronies are now in the Tenures of mean Gentlemen and others who neither may nor do challenge unto themselves in any respect hereof any Nobility without the great favour of the King 's most Excellent Majesty who is the Fountain of all Honour within his Dominions Thirdly Some ancient Barons there are that have aliened and sold many of those Castles and Mannors which did bear the Name and Dignity of Baronage and yet themselves do still retain and lawfully keep their Estate Dignity and Degree of Baron and have been and usually are such Alienations notwithstanding summoned nevertheless to the Parliament and there do take and hold their ancient place accordingly To these Objections it shall be convenient for the more easie unfolding the sâ—ate of this Question to exhibit certain necessary distinctions and upon them to draw true and infallible Conclusions and then to prove them by authority of Law consent of Time and manifold Presidents which done the Answer will be presently made as I conceive to every of the aforesaid Objections First therefore If a Baron by Tenure which holdeth any Castle Honour or Mannor by Baronage do Alien oâ— give the same away he doth it either with or without a Licence obtained from his Majesty for the same If he doth it without a Licence then the Conclusion is certain But by the Laws of this Realm the Barony Honour Castle or Mannor so aliened without licence or consent is forâ—eited and the same Honour Castle and Mannor â—o â—olden by Barony and so aliened is to â—e seized in the King's hands and the â—aid Forfeiture and such Dignity and Estate no longer to be born and continue but to be resumed and extinguished in the Crown from whence it was derived The reason therefore is notable if we call to remembrance that which was formerly alledged out of Bracton That Baronies are the strength of the Realm and suffer no division they suffer also no alienation without the consent or licence of the Sovereign Monarch for so should the Realm be infeebled and base persons ennobled without desert of Vertue or Prowess For where the thing so aliened is an Honour or Head of a Barony it differeth much from the ordinary Tenure in Capite whereof if the Tenant make Alienation without Licence he is only to pay a Fine by the Statute of 1 Edw. 3. cap. 12. whereof also before the making of the Statute there was diversity of Opinions at the Common Law after the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 31. And for further proof see Glanvile In Edward the Third certain Lands being parcel of the Barony of Bremberway were aliened by William de Browse the Baron thereof without the King's Licence and in the Argument of the Case concerning the same Judge Green delivered this for Law First That parcel of a Barony or Earldom of the King in chief cannot be aliened or dismembred without his Licence and if it be it shall be seized into the King's hands as forfeited and the King shall be seized thereof in his own right again In 43 Edw. 3. it was found by an Office that William Bishop of Chester had leased unto one Iohn Preston for his Life a Mannor which was parcel of the Mannor of the said Bishoprick without Licence and it was resolved by the Judges and others of the King's Council That the same was forfeited but by mediation of the said Council the Bishop submitted himself to the King and made a Fine and several Scire Facias's issued out against them that had received the many proâ—its to answer unto the King thereof And thus much concerning Alienations of Baronies without Licence But on the other part if a Baron by Tenure who holds any Honour Castle or Mannor by Barony do grant or alien the same by Licence I must again distinguish for either such Alienation is made for the continuance of his Barony Honour Lands and Tenements in his own Name Blood and Issue Male or else the same Alienation is made for Money or other Recompence or otherwise to a meer Stranger and hereof ensueth this second Conclusion or Assertion That if such Alienation be made for the continuance of his Barony in his Name and Blood or Issue Male