Selected quad for the lemma: honour_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
honour_n	eternal_a	glory_n	immortality_n	1,513	5	10.0609	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63017	The re-assertion of grace, or, Vindiciæ evangelii a vindication of the Gospell-truths, from the unjust censure and undue aspersions of Antinomians : in a modest reply to Mr. Anth. Burgesses Vindiciæ legis, Mr. Rutherfords Triall and tryumph of faith, from which also Mr. Geerie and M. Bedford may receive a satisfactory answer / by Robert Towne.	Towne, Robert, 1592 or 3-1663.; Bushell, Seth, 1621-1684.; Towne, Robert, 1592 or 3-1663. Monomachia, or, A single reply to Mr. Rutherford's book ...	1654 (1654)	Wing T1980; ESTC R23436	205,592	262

So in the Closure of your said Preface is a too over-weening conceit and high esteem of this your elaborate and profound Treatise which is become as a Sun newly risen in our Church the which if it let us not see what is Truth what is Error a thousand Suns cannot It had been well if you had brought one of the least beams of the true Sun In Iob we read of one who darkned knowledg and I am sure the true Sun of Righteousness doth not shine forth to the world any more clearly by these Lectures To say no more I could reduce all your Exceptions and the Points in controversie to a few Heads which I find dispread and infinitely repeated but then perhaps you would think your self somewhat wronged or else the Reader would not be so fully satisfied Therefore as you do so I am enforced to set before him the same dish of sodden Colworts usque ad nauseam and yet leasure will not serve it would prove also too tedious to speak to all your Book My intent then is only to examine what you writ against your special eye-sore the Antinomian how candidly you deal with him and how solidly you confute his Positions or Tenets LECTURE I. Mr. B. Text 1 Tim. 1.8 9. Knowing the Law is good if a man use it lawfully Answer In Page 3 and 4. you say the Law is good in three several Respects in the prosecution of all which I could except against divers things but that I shall have often occasion and a more proper place to speak them all afterwards Mr. B. pag. 4. It the Law is good in respect of the Sanction of it for it 's accompanied with Promises c. and therefore the Law doth include Christ secondarily and occasionally though not primarily Ans I stand musing at this your Novel-assertion That the Moral Law for of this you will have us to understand you not of the Ceremonal doth include Christ whereas the Apostle saith Rom. 3.21 That the righteousness of Faith is revealed without the Law And Gal. 3.11 The Law is not of Faith Now if the Doctrine of Christian Righteousness and Faith be not contained in the Law I see not how Christ should be there included And yet you presently add It 's true the righteousness of the Law and that of the Gospel differ toto coelo We must place one in suprema parte coeli and the other in ima parte terrae as Luther Now I thus argue 1. Christ and his Righteousness are inseparable If Christs Righteousness which is the only Righteousness of the Gospel be as far above and out of the bounds of the Law as the highest part of Heaven is distant from the lowest part of the Earth then it is impossible that Christ should any way be included in the Law Or 2. You will make the Law more capacious and of far larger extent then is the righteousness of it so that the righteousness of the Law must be kept below but the Law it self filleth Heaven and Earth or is above as well as below even where Christ is This is your New Divinity a late Upstart It is strange to see what shifts you are often put unto and how to strain your wits if not conscience also for as you want no good-will to maintain and uphold the tot ring Ministry and Doctrine of your Party so perceiving Dr. Taylor and others in a way scarce justifiable and to use Arguments and distinctions not solid and ineffectual to convince the Adversary or to confirm your Opinions you are thus resolved to go in an unbeaten and new-found path in hope to effect your desire But to proceed And know also that your said Author Dr. Luther saith That Christ is no more in the Law nor yet the Christian then Christ is now in the grave or Peter in the Prison Again saith he A believer is out of the limits of the Law in another Kingdom c. How far your secondarily and occasionally shall be made to extend or how you will expound them I know not you promise more hereafter that is a supersede as now M. B. It 's the hardest task in Divinity to give them Law and Gospel their bounds Ans Yet you have undertaken that task and presume to have done it magnis excidis ausis M. B. It 's true if we take Law and Gospel in this strict difference as some Divines do that all the Precepts where-ever they are must be under the Law and all the Promises be reduced to the Gospel whether in the Old or new Testament in which sence Divines then say Lex jubat Gratia juvat and Lex imperat fides impetrat then the Law can have no Sanction by the Promise But where can this be shewed in Scripture Ans What struggling is here to evade Your reading exceeds mine I remember none who so reduced and marshalled Precepts and Promises If I credit you in this it is not material I am sure that all Orthodox Divines I read Promiss aliae conditionales viz. logales Evangel gratuitae Mela. and the Scripture do witness That there be legal Promises which be conditional As He that doth these things shall live in them Gal. 3.12 And to them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honor and immortality is promised eternal life Rom. 2.7 And that the Gospel-Promises are absolute and free being onely founded in Christ in whom they have their sanction and establishment 2 Cor. 1.20 All the Promises of God in him are Yea and in him Amen unto the glory of God by us Secondly August Luther Calvin Zanchy Melancthon with others in whom we read those expressions and the like viz. That what is only propounded and commanded in the Law is obtained wrought and established by the grace and faith of the Gospel according to that in Rom. 3.31 We through faith establish the Law These Authors I say do yet make a clear difference between Evangelical and legal Promises and therefore cannot be understood in this your sence But lastly If the Spirit do convert quicken and give power by the Precepts and in and by commanding God do convey his grace of Regeneration which is your Opinion then this question is to no purpose Whether all the Promises be reduced to the Gospel or not Neither can it be truly affirmed then That the Law is established by the grace and faith of the Gospel which yet is both according to the verity of Scripture and the Testimonies of all Authors as is already shewed Now let the Reader judg or your self whether the Law can have Sanction by promise or no. M. B. I wonder much at an Antinomian Author saying It cannot be a Law unless it also be a cursing Law Assert of Gr. p. 31. For besides that the same Author doth acknowledg the Moral Law to be a Rule to a Believer and regula hath vim praecepti as well as doctrinae Ans The Author you mention doth

exceedingly prone therefore saith I am thy God as I have made my self formerly known unto thee and thou shalt have no other as not worship stocks and stones so not form and conceive otherwise of me in thy heart and minde And verily as the heavenly light of this true knowledge of God which did appear in the word and work of atonement by Jesus Christ began to be eclipsed and darkened in the Church so idolatry and superstition crept in and prevailed till at last it became palpably gross by Images Pictures using of Saints for Advocates and the like And the bright and glorious arising and shining forth of the Sun of Righteousness who hath health under his wings Mal. 4.4 will prove the alone effectual means to disperse dispel demolish and abolish all that trash and superstitions vanities and to instruct and guide mens souls aright into the knowledge of the true God M. B. The practical use is to pray and labour for such a free and heavenly heart that the Law of God may not be a terrour to you Answ You have taken a course for that aforehand for how can the Law be a terrour while you teach that it cannot curse nor condemn but thus a mans heart may flatter him with a false peace in the way of legal conformity having not attained to the righteousness of Faith or of Christ Again that Spirit which maketh the heart so free and heavenly that the precepts of the Law are sweetness and delight cometh not by the Ministery of the Law but of the Gospel this is not the Spirit of bondage to fear but of Adoption Grace and love Therefore let us pray and labour that the Gospell may have a free passage and be glorified LECT VI. Rom. 2.14 15. For when the Gentiles which knew not the Law c. M. B. Pa. 58. OBservation There is law of nature writen in mens hearts How can the Antinomian think that the moral law in respect of the mandatory power of it ceaseth Ans Your Antinomian thinketh as you also know that the moral law is perpetual and inviolable in respect of the mandatory and damnatory power also within its own territories and dominion there is nothing taken from it thus you mistake him forget your self and abuse your reader and hearers M. B. Page 59. This is good to take notice of against a fundamental error of the Antinomians about the Law in general for they conceive it impossible but that the damning act of the Law must be where the commanding act of a Law is Answ If this errour be fundamental I muse you bring no stronger Artillery to batter and quite raze it 2. Your adversary speaketh of the power and you dispute of the Act there may be power where it is not alway acting 3. I say still The law hath power from the Author of it indifferently to command and to condemne If the Law of our Land should never condemne or punish actually for murder because no man-slayer is to be found yet it hath power to do it nvertheless when occasion shall serve M. B. There are only two things go to the essence of a law c. 1. Direction 2. Obligation Answ These are but your words without warrant or weight which can never carry it your part is to refell the contrary 2. If there be such a law which can onely direct and oblige to it the Apostles Argument may seem to be invalid Gal. 3.10 saying They that are of the works of the Law are cursed c. for a man may be of the works of the Law as it is of power to oblige to direct and oblige only say you and yet be exempt and free from the curse I much marvel that you or any can suppose a law obliging to it for obedience and yet not obliging or binding to answer for disobedience Whatever the Law saith it saith to them that are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world become guilty before God Rom. 3.19 Herein say you lyeth the essence of sin that it breaketh the Law which supposeth the obligatory force of it Answ Sin is a swerving from the rule of direction 1 John 3.4 But can there be sin and not guilt or can you suppose a man to be formally a sinner and yet out of condemnation by the law by preventing that consequence as you call it Lastly a man is properly odious and hateful to God in that he is a sinner and not as he is guilty and subject to the curse which be the effects of justice occasioned only by sin M. B. God by reason of the dominion he had over man might have commanded obedience and yet never a promise of eternal life Answ To what purpose do you here tell us what God might have done where the question is of what God hath done what a law he hath made and put man under which as it commandeth obedience so it condemneth disobedience Rom. 2.8 9. Who God will render unto every one according to his deeds to them who by patient continuance in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality eternal life But to them who are contentious and do not obey the truth but obey unrighteousness indignation and wrath Is not here the express and full minde of God in his law and will you curtaile or conceal any part of it Besides how can it stand with divine justice to constitute a Law without power to punish transgressors when he giveth his law in charge he saith That he setteth before them life and death blessing and cursing Deut. 30.19 You may long tell any sober understanding man that he may safely put his hand into the fire it cannot burn him for there may be a fire without power to burn before you can perswade him unto it And yet God hath sufficient power to do this also M. B. As for the other consequent act of the law to curse and punish that is but an accidental act and not necessary to a law for it cometh in upon supposition of a transgression and therefore as we may say of a Magistrate He was a just and compleat Magistrate for his time though he put forth no punitive justice if there be no malefactors offending so is it about a law Answ The Apostle in Gal. 3.19 doth strongly and convincingly conclude against you viz. that the moral law came in with power not only to direct but to reveal wrath curse and condemne for saith he It was added because of transgression that is to accuse and convince of it and to condemne for it that so it might be subservient to the promise in preparing the heart for Christ the blessed Seed This is plaine to be Gods intent in giving and bringing in his law at the first by Moses except you can since then let us see how it is altered or where and when the law was onely given to direct and oblige the other authority and power being denied it or rather taken away