Selected quad for the lemma: honour_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
honour_n due_a fear_v tribute_n 3,178 5 10.8957 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A35517 A discourse shewing that kings have their being and authority from God that therefore good kings when dead are lamented, that all while living are to be obeyed, and that treason and rebellion are punishable both in this and the next world : preached the Sunday following the news of the death of ... Charles the Second / by John Curtois ... Curtois, John, 1650 or 51-1719. 1685 (1685) Wing C7700; ESTC R17308 19,772 38

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

in a little than whom we cannot expect we cannot wish we cannot pray for a better And I question not but his Memory will be ever pretious with us and we shall never mention him now dead but with that respect and honour that we serv'd him when alive Onely here I would advise that we reflect not on him as men without hope but as we look with an eye of sorrow back upon him so that with an eye of joy we would look forward upon his Successour our present King James II. by a true Lineal descent seated upon the Throne of his Fathers that we would hope from him all the generous Actions of his Ancestours We shall be very ungratefull and unworthy if we doe otherwise For this most Serene Prince hath more than once expos'd his Life to the mouth of the devouring Cannon and the as merciless Sea for our preservation And since the Death of his Royal Brother hath been pleas'd to give his Royal Word to preserve this Government both in Church and State as 't is now by Law Established A distrust of that would be an odious suspicion of his want of the sense of Conscience and Honour It would be likewise an impious distrust of God's Good Providence over us For we are told by Solomon Prov. 21.1 The King's Heart is in the Hand of the Lord as the Rivers of Water He turneth it whethersoever he will So much to our first Inference Secondly Kings having their Being and Authority from God are to be obey'd So St. Paul argues in this first verse of his 13th Chap. to the Romans Let every Soul be subject to the Higher Powers for there is not Power but of God the Powers that be are ordained of God And the like at the 4th verse c. He is the Minister of God a Revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil wherefore ye must needs be subject not onely for wrath but also for Conscience sake For for this cause pay ye Tribute also for they are God's Ministers attending continually on this very thing Render therefore to all their Dues Tribute to whom Tribute is due Custome to whom Custome Fear to whom Fear Honour to whom Honour So then every subject is to pay Obedience to his Prince as being the Minister of God No man no order of men can plead exemption or dispensation from it For the words are general and indefinite and being of a moral nature comprehend all Potentates and all Subjects in all times and places This is the sense of the most ancient and learned Commentatours upon the place And according to them that of St. Peter in his 1 Epistle and 2 Chap. Hath the same extent and meaning where he bids Submit your selves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake whether it be to the King as Supreme or unto Governours as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evil-doers and for the praise of them that doe well For so is the will of God that with well-doeing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men But these Apostolical precepts must be understood to extend no farther than to things warrantable by a previous Law of God For if a King command or enact any thing that is contrary to what God hath already declar'd to be his will therein the Subject is to not yield obedience to him The reason of it is because God is Superiour to the King and all the Authority the King hath he hath received from God And therefore no good Christian will nor ought to obey his Prince any farther than it may be consistent with his primary duty to God And the Apostolical practice herein is a good comment upon the Doctrine When some of the Apostles were commanded by the Sanhedrim of the Jews not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus Act. 4.19 they gave this Answer Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God judge ye for we cannot but speak the things we have seen and heard And afterward when they charged them with neglect and disregard of their commands saying did we not straitly command you that you should not teach in this name Act. 5.29 and Behold you have fill'd Jerusalem with your Doctrine they answer'd and said We ought to obey God rather than men The like to which had been done before by some holy men of God under the old Testament When King Nebuchandnezzar had set up a Golden Image and had made a decree that every person under his Government should fall down and worship it Dan. 3.18 and that he that deny'd it should be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace Shadrach Meshach and Abednego would not regard his Decree and told him they would not serve his Gods nor worship the Golden Image which he had set up And when King Darius had Dan. 6.7 10. Established a Royal Statute that whosoever should ask a Perition of any God or Man for thirty days save of himself he should be cast into a den of Lyons The Prophet Daniel when he knew the King had sign'd this writing went into his house and his window being open in his chamber he kneeled upon his knees three times a day and prayed and gave thanks unto his God as he did aforetime From all which it is evident that the Commands of a King are obligatory to every Subject except where they cantradict the Commands of God and then the Subject may lawfully deny the performance of them But then he ought to be well satisfyed by serious and deliberate examination of the matter that what he so refuseth bears a real contrariety to the Commands of God For a Conscience not thus rectify'd cannot justifie any such refusal These Holy Men indeed now mention'd deny'd obedience to the commands of their Governours but First they were truly satisfied that in performing of them they should directly violate the Laws of God And after all if a man cannot with any satisfaction to his soul to give an Active Obedience to the Laws of his Prince yet he must yield a Passive Obedience i.e. if he cannot with a good Conscience doe the Law he must quietly suffer the penalty of it he must not refist his Prince with force or violence but patiently submit to the punishments he shall inflict upon him This is a Doctrine that is harsh to flesh and bloud and so indeed are most of the Doctrines of the Gospel but is as clearly the Christian's duty as any other there revealed St. Paul is as urgent for this Passive Obedience as for the Active in the verse following the Text. Whosoever therefore saith he resisteth the power resisteth the Ordinance of God and they that resist shall receive to themselves Damnation And so is St. Peter in the words following those afore-cited from him Servants be subject to your Masters with all fear not onely to the good and