Selected quad for the lemma: honour_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
honour_n	david_n	king_n	saul_n	1,226	5	9.8585	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15408	Hexapla in Genesin & Exodum: that is, a sixfold commentary upon the two first bookes of Moses, being Genesis and Exodus Wherein these translations are compared together: 1. The Chalde. 2. The Septuagint. 3. The vulgar Latine. 4. Pagnine. 5. Montanus. 6. Iunius. 7. Vatablus. 8. The great English Bible. 9. The Geneva edition. And 10. The Hebrew originall. Together with a sixfold vse of every chapter, shewing 1. The method or argument: 2. The divers readings: 3. The explanation of difficult questions and doubtfull places: 4. The places of doctrine: 5. Places of confutation: 6. Morall observations. In which worke, about three thousand theologicall questions are discussed: above forty authors old and new abridged: and together comprised whatsoever worthy of note, either Mercerus out of the Rabbines, Pererius out of the fathers, or Marloran out of the new writers, have in their learned commentaries collected. By Andrew Willet, minister of the gospell of Iesus Christ.	Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621.; Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621. Hexapla in Genesin. aut; Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621. Hexapla in Exodum. aut	1633 (1633)	STC 25685; ESTC S114193	2,366,144	1,184

Numb 2. and the other of Core his rebellious assemblies Numb 16. who was of Levi but it is more properly referred to the time past concerning the cruell exploit of Simeon and Levi Perer. QUEST VIII Whether Simeon and Levi digged downe a wall killed or haughed the oxen Vers. 6. IN their selfe-will they digged downe a wall 1. Some read they haughed a bull Septuag or carried away their oxen Iun. They which follow this reading some referre it to Sichem who was the principall man whom they slue some understand it of Ioseph who is compared to a bullocke Deut. 33.17 the same word shor is there used Tharg Hieros because Simeon and L●vi are held to bee ring-leaders in that conspiracie against Ioseph for they were of the elder sort not the younger brethren that would have had Ioseph killed now Ruben and Iudah the first and the fourth sonnes consented not to kill him therefore it is most like that Simeon and Levi were the authors for which cause some thinke that Ioseph afterward caused Simeon to be bound in Egypt but this exposition agreeth not with the former clause in their wrath they slue a man for Ioseph was not killed Iunius seemeth to understand it of the spoile of the Citie and carrying away of their cattell but that seemeth to have beene the act rather of Iacobs sonnes than of Simeon and Levi Gen. 34.28 2. Mercer Musculus Calvin thinke this to bee the better reading they digged thorow a wall Of which reading these reasons may bee given 1. Because this was a more peculiar and proper act of their rage than to carrie away their oxen that proceeded of a covetous rather than irefull minde 2. Though this be not directly expressed yet these words insinuate as much they went into the citie boldly Gen. 34.25 that is breaking into the citie violently and over throwing the wals before them Perer. 3. Though shor the word here used signifie an oxe shur a wall yet schurech may bee put for ch●lem as the Chalde Interpreter readeth shur 4. The word ghacar to root or pull up properly understood of plants Eccles. 3.2 is more fitly by a metaphor applyed to the rooting up of cities Z●phan 2.4 than unto cattell and living things 3. But these reasons notwithstanding I rather preferre the reading of the Septuagint they houghed an oxe or bull for shor the word here used signifieth an oxe c. 32.5 Deut. 33.17 the word shur is a wall neither needed they to have undermined the wals the citie being secure and the gates open unto them the word ghakar is gnakar signifieth to hough or cut sinewes as Iosh. 11.6 Ioshua is bidden of the Lord to hough the Canaanites horse it seemeth in their furie that they abused the dumb beasts as Balaam in his rage threatned if he had had a sword to have killed his Asse Numb 12.29 now in that this is not mentioned before in the storie it need not see me strange in all matters and circumstances of fact the Scripture useth not to expresse as that of Iacobs concerning the Amorites with the sword bow c. 48.22 QUEST IX How Simeon and Levi were divided in Israel Vers. 7. I Will divide them in Iacob 1. Iacob appointeth a punishment answerable to the offence for as before they conspired together to doe mischiefe so now they shall be separated and divided Iun. 2. Which accordingly came to passe for Simeon had no possession or inheritance by himselfe but intermingled with Iudah Ios. 19. and were constrained afterward by force of armes to inlarge their bounds 1 Chron. 4.41 Iun. Some thinke that the poore Scribes which were dispersed in Israel came of Simeon Tha●g Hieros But certaine it is that it was a base and contemptible tribe in respect of the rest for which cause Moses omitteth it in his blessing Deut. 33. Mercer rather than for that Simeon was cruell against the Sichemites for then Levi should have beene omitted also or because Simeon was the chiefe in the conspiracie against Ioseph or because Iudas Iscariot came of Simeon for both these are uncertaine or for that Zimri of Simeon lately had committed such an uncleane act as Perer. 3. Levi also was divided in Israel they had no certaine inheritance but only certaine cities allotted unto them among the rest of the tribes to the number of 48. Ios. 21. they also went wandring up and downe the tribes to gather the tithes of their maintenance Mercer 4. Yet God who could bring light out of darknesse turned this which at the first was ordained for a punishment to a blessing for the calling of the Levites was honourable to themselves and everie one was glad to entertaine them it was also profitable to others for their instruction Calvin 5. This prophecie against Simeon and Levi is not unfitly by Ambrose Ruffin Rupert applyed against the Scribes Priests that put Christ to death for by this means the wals of Ierusalem were digged down overthrown the Jewes are dispersed in the world to this day Perer. QUEST X. Of the preeminence of Iudah Vers. 8. THy brethren shall praise thee c. 1. Though Iudah also was faultie concerning Thamar yet Iacob passeth over his offences and of the rest of his sons touching onely the most notorious sinnes among the rest as of Ruben Simeon Levi Muscul. 2. In saying Thy brethren shall praise thee he alludeth to the name of Iudah so called by Leah of judah to praise because shee had occasion thereby to praise the Lord and now his brethren shall magnifie and praise him Iun. The Chalde readeth Thou hast confessed and wast not ashamed which some understand of Iudah his delivering of Ioseph or of his acquiting of Thamar but the other reading is more proper 3. Iacob prophesieth foure things of Iudah 1. His principalitie over his brethren vers 8. 2. His victorie over his enemies vers 9. 3. The stabilitie and continuance of his kingdome under the Messiah vers 10. 4. His outward plentie and prosperitie vers 11. 4. Thy fathers sonnes shall bow downe c. Though Ioseph for the time present had the temporall honour yet the perpetuall preeminence is given to Iudah so that hence it appeareth why the Lord was angrie with the people for desiring a King because the time was not yet come when God purposed to exalt Iudah and for the same cause the Kingdome of Saul of Benjamin not of Iudah prospered not Calvin 5. This authoritie of Iudah over his brethren tooke beginning Iudg. 1. when the tribe of Iudah was appointed to be as the Captaine to the rest after Iosua his departure but it was more fully accomplished in David and Salomon and most of all in Christ of David of whose kingdome shall be none end Iun. 6. Although the ten tribes did revolt from Iudah yet the right of the kingdome remained with Iudah still which continued notwithstanding it was often by Israel impugned when the other was dissolved Calvin QUEST XI Of the explication of the

toward their masters he saith likewise unto Masters Doe ye the same things unto them Ephes. 6.9 So both superiours and inferiours must discerne what is due to each one in their place and accordingly by the rule of justice measure out unto them Contrary hereunto is partiality and inequality when any doe exact at others hands what is due unto them but are negligent in doing their duty as the Prophet Ezechiel crieth out against those Shepheards which did feed themselves fat but would not feed the flockes againe Ezech. 34.2 2. There is required diligence and sedulity in every one to doe his duty faithfully and studiously whether superiour or inferiour as Rom. 12.7 He that hath an office must wait on his office c. he that distributeth with simplicity he that ruleth with diligence c. Contrary hereunto are 1. Negligence and carelesnesse in men either not to know their duty or knowing it not practising accordingly as the Prophet Zachary crieth out against the foolish shepheard which did not looke for that which was lost c. Zachar. 11.15 16. 2. Hypocrisie in doing of the office rather for praise or commendation than of conscience which S. Paul calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eye-service Ephes. 6.6 3. Curiosity when one busieth himselfe with anothers office and medleth with things not appertaining unto him against such busie bodies the Apostle speaketh 1. Tim. 6.13 3. Love is commanded both in superiours toward their inferiours and in them againe toward the other Matth. 6.24 This reason is given why one cannot serve two masters because he cannot love them both Contrary hereunto is 1. Want of naturall love which was one of the sinnes of the Heathen Rom. 1. 30. 2. Too much indulgence or foolish affection which winketh at their faults or gratifieth them in things not lawfull and so they one beare with another as the Prophet saith they wrap it up Micah 7.3 4. Mutuall gratitude in acknowledging the benefits mutually received as appeareth in Davids kindnesse toward Mephibosheth for his fathers sake and his thankfulnes againe for the same 2. Sam. 19.29 30. Contrary hereunto is 1. Ingratitude and unthankfulnesse as Saul was unkinde to David who deserved well of him 2. Mutuall gratification in things unlawfull as Ioab served Davids turne in hastening Vrias death 5. Sobernesse and gravity in a moderate respect of our credit and estimation in the world in doing of our duty as the Apostle saith Let every man prove his owne worke and then shall he have rejoycing in himselfe and not in other Galath 6.3 Contrary hereunto are 1. Levity in being carelesse to preserve a good name in the world such the Prophet saith have a whores forehead Ierem. 3.3 which are impudent and shamelesse and blush not at any thing 2. Ambition and vaine glory when one doth their duty for the praise of men as Herod Act. 12. when he apparelled himselfe gorgeously and made an oration to the people 6. Modesty also is requisite that every one consider their owne infirmity neither ascribing too much unto themselves in their doings nor detracting from others as the Apostle saith Galath 6.3 If any seeme to himselfe that he is somewhat when he is nothing he deceiveth himselfe c. Contrary hereunto are 1. Arrogancy and vaine ostentation as Pilate said to our blessed Saviour vaunting of his authority Knowest thou not that I have power to crucifie thee and power to loose thee Ioh. 19.10 2. Dissimulation when one pretendeth modesty in refusing of honours that he may be had in more admiration as Saul that hid himselfe among the stuffe when he was chosen King 1. Sam. 10.22 7. Equity and moderation which is a mutuall toleration of ordinary defects and infirmities both in superiours and inferiours and a mitigating of the rigour in the full exacting of duties as S. Peter giveth this counsell to servants Be subject to your masters with all feare not only to the good and courteous but also to the froward 1. Pet. 2.18 Contrary hereunto are 1. Too much rigour in finding fault and censuring of others which our blessed Saviour reproveth Matth. 7.3 Why seest thou the meat in thy brothers eye and perceivest not the beame in thine owne eye 2. Too much lenity in winking at others faults and not reproving them as time and place requireth as it is in the Psalme 50.18 When thou seest a theefe thou ruinest with him c. as they doe which see and suffer others to sinne and reprove them not 3. Flattery and soothing men up in their sinnes which the Prophet calleth sowing of pillowes under their arme holes Ezech. 13.18 Sic fere Vrsinus 2. Doct. Of honouring of the spirituall parents by giving them due maintenance as by tithes c. HOnour thy father and thy mother c. One speciall part of this honouring is to give reliefe and maintenance as to our naturall parents so also to our spirituall fathers whom Saint Paul would to be had in double honour 1. Tim. 5.17 that is to bee sufficiently maintained and the reason hereof is Servus communitatis debet sustentari à communitate the servant of the comminalty must bee maintained by the comminalty as Saint Paul reasoneth that they which serve at the Altar must live of the Altar Laborant bono publico c. they labour for the publike good and therefore they should bee maintained by the publike good which is performed two wayes either by the common treasure where any such is or by the goods in common of particular persons Tostat. qu. 19. But S. Paul giveth a better reason 1. Cor. 9.11 If we have sowen unto you spirituall things is it a great thing if we reape your carnall They therefore which give grudgingly sparingly and fraudulently toward the maintenance of their Pastour and Teacher and doe withdraw their rights and tithes due unto them doe offend against this Commandement in not honouring their spirituall parents 3. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the Maniches FIrst the Maniches who rejected the old Testament objected that this precept of honouring the parents is contrarie to that in the new Testament where our Saviour said to one that asked leave to goe and bury his father Let the dead bury the dead Luk. 9. Augustine thus answereth 1. If herein the old Testament and the new are contrary then the new herein should be contrary to it selfe for S. Paul also urgeth this Commandement Ephes. 6.2 2. Whereby it is manifest saith he Honorem parentum in gradu suo esse servandum c. That honour in a certaine degree is to be reserved unto parents Eos tamen in divini amoris comparatione c. yet that in comparison of the love of God there is no doubt but they ought to be contemned Cont. Adimant cap. 6. 2. Confut. Against the Anabaptists which deny government SEcondly the Anabaptists are here condemned which deny that it is lawfull for a Christian to be a Magistrate because Christ hath made us free Contra 1.

in minutias secare peccata Wee must divide our sinnes into small peeces that is confesse them particularly unto God Procop. 5. And as this perfume was only to be offered unto God so our prayers must only be directed unto him Osiander QUEST XLII How the Lord talked with Moses in the Mercie seat whether in any visible shape Vers. 36. WHere I will meet with thee c. 1. That is in the Arke of the Testimony before mentioned not in the Altar of incense because as Lyranus saith the voice of the Lord was heard from the Mercie seat thither for neither did it belong unto Moses but unto Aaron to offer incense and the Lord used to speake unto Moses not from the Altar of incense but from the Mercie seat Numb 7.89 Tostat. quaest 16. 2. But though in this he correcteth Lyranus upon good ground yet he himselfe is more grossely deceived that Moses who was privileged at all times to goe into the most holy place videbat effigiem qu● apparebat in propitiatorio c. he saw a certaine shape which appeared in the Mercie seat which was an Angell in a bodily appearance And for this cause he saith the high Priest when he went into the most holy place was with a cloud of incense to cover the Mercie seat Levit. 16.13 that the Angell in that visible shape might not be seene Tostat. qu. 17. Contra. 1. God could frame a voice from the Mercy seat without any such visible apparition therefore it is superfluous to imagine any such 2. Neither is it more like that Moses saw any image in the most holy place than he did in mount Horeb Deut. 4.15 3. The cloud of incense was to cover the Mercie sea● not to that end but for reverence of the place that the high Priest should not gaze upon Gods seat 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That it is lawfull to number the people upon just occasion Vers. 12. WHen thou takest the sum of the children of Israel c. It is not then unlawfull for Princes to take the numbers of their people either to make choice of such as are fit for warre or for the imposition of moderate and necessary taxes and subsidies As here this people are numbred to levy a certaine summe toward the maintenance of the Tabernacle Servius Bullus is noted to have beene the first that brought in this order of summing and mustering the people in the Romane Common-wealth which as a politike device may safely be reteined now of Christian Magistrates so that they do it not with ostentation as rejoycing in the numbers of the people and as it were placing their confidence therein which was Davids fault when he caused Ioab to number the people 2 Sam. 24. Simler But Kings when they see their people to multiply and increase may thereby be stirred up to give the praise unto God as the Wise-man saith In the multitude of the people is the honour of a King and for want of people commeth the destruction of the Prince Prov. 14.28 2. Doct. God is no accepter of persons Vers. 15. THe rich shall not passe and the poore shall not diminish from halfe a sicle This sheweth that God is no accepter of persons that the poore as well as the rich doe belong unto him therefore God would have the poore to pay as much as the rich lest they might have thought themselves to be lesse deare in Gods sight So the Apostle saith There is neither Iew nor Grecian there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Iesus Galath 3.28 Marbach 3. Doct. The Ministers of the word are to be competently maintained Vers. 16. ANd put it to the use of the Tabernacle Here the common charge of the Tabernacle and the things thereunto belonging lieth upon the contribution of the people which sheweth how ready and carefull all sorts of men ought to be in maintenance of the Lords house for he that is borne to inherit heaven must thinke himselfe borne to maintaine ●he meanes that lead us unto heaven Men are carefull to maintaine their labouring beasts which worke for their corporall food as the Apostle to this purpose alleageth that text out of the Law Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the oxe that treadeth out the corne 1 Cor. 9.9 much more should the Ministers of Gods word be maintained which labour for the food of our soules To this purpose B. Babingt 5. Places of controversie 1. Controv. Against the invocation of Saints Vers. 8. THe perfume shall be perpetually before the Lord c. As this perfume was only to be censed to the Lord which signifieth the prayers of the Saints so God only through Christ must be invocated this honour must not be given unto any other Simler for God only must be beleeved upon as our blessed Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 And men cannot call on him in whom they have not beleeved Rom. 10.14 2. Controv. Against superstitious censing of Churches NOw seeing that this perfume and incense was a type of the spirituall sacrifices and prayers of the faithfull Psal. 141.2 Apocal. 8.3 which types and figures are now ceased the superstition here of the Romanists and Grecians is discovered that use censers and censing still in their Churches not as a civill thing for reverence and decencie but as a part of their religious service which seeing it is now abrogate with other shadowes the body being come Coloss. 2.17 I say with Gallasius Caret testimoni● verbi merum hominis commentum est It wanteth the testimony of the word and is a meere device of man 3. Controv. Of the superstitious use of washing the hands among the Romanists Vers. 21. SO they shall wash their hands c. The Romanists have the like use who when they addresse themselves to consecrate the host and to approach unto the Altar doe wash their fingers muttering these words of the Prophet David Psal. 26.6 I will wash mine hands in innocencie O Lord and compasse thine Altar The like fashion was retained among the Gentiles among whom it was counted an impious thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with unwashen hands to handle holy things But this outward ceremony did not make the idolatrous service of the Heathen acceptable so neither is the superstitious worship of the Romanists thereby justified who while they wash their hands coenam Christi profanant c. doe profane Christs supper and take away the fruitfull application and efficacie of his death by instituting a new sacrifice Gallas And as Pilate washed his hands yet delivered Christ over to be crucified so they wash their hands and yet doe crucifie Christ daily in the Masse in offering him up still in sacrifice 4. Controv. Against the superstitious Chrisme of the Romanists Vers. 29. ANd thou shalt make of it the oile of holy ointment c. This holy ointment was a type and figure of the spirituall

this charge give● to Ioseph we doe learne that the bodies of the Saints ought in comely and reverent sort to be brought to the grave as the brethren that feared God carried Steven to be buried with great lamention Act. 8.2 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of an oath Vers. 31. ANd he sware unto him It was lawfull for Iacob in some serious and weighty matter to enquire an oath and for Ioseph to performe it for men are mutable and therefore may be bound with an oath and though Ioseph might otherwise have fulfilled his fathers will yet it was not amisse that he should be more straitly bound we see then the lawfull use of an oath against the errour of the Anabaptists which allow not Christians to take an oath for the Apostle saith An oath for confirmation among men is an end of strife Heb. 6.16 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against the corrupt Latine translation of this place Vers. 31. ISrael worshipped toward the beds head not as the vulgar Latine readeth he adored the top of his rod Heb. 11.21 which translation differeth both from the Latine in this place which thus interpreteth he worshipped turning toward the beds head and from the Septuagint which readeth he worshipped or bowed himselfe ùpi to ácron upon the top of his rod or staffe the Latine text corruptly leaveth out the preposition ùpi upon but it differeth most of all from the Hebrew which standeth thus he worshipped toward the beds head from which reading the Septuagint doe varie in these two points first in adding the word àute his which is not in the Hebrew secondly in mistaking the word for mittah a bed reading mitteh a rod both which words are derived of natah which signifieth to extend or stretch forth because a man doth stretch himselfe upon his bed and on his staffe Wherefore we see what a simple ground the Rhemists have to prove by this corrupt Latine text that creatures may be adored annot Hebr. 10.21 there being no such thing in the Hebrew Greeke or Latine text in this place that Iacob adored his rod. Further the like ground had Hadrianus the Pope as hee is cited in that erronious Councell the second Nicene who by this text would prove the adoration of Images with relation to their protipa that is the presidents patterns or patrons of those Images because say they the adoration which Iacob gave to this rod he intended it to Ioseph whose rod and scepter it was for Iacob worshipped not either his owne staffe or Iosephs scepter but toward the beds head worshipped God 2. Confut. That the Latine text is not authenticall FUrther whereas the Apostle seemeth to follow the translation of the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew text the Rhemists doe infer thereupon that after the same manner the vulgar Latine text may be received as authenticall though it doe varie from the Hebrew ibid. Contra. 1. The Apostles indeed doe sometime follow the Septuagint because it was a common translation and of great authority but they therein neither approve their errors nor yet make it of equall authority to the originall citing only such testimonies wherein the Greeke translation keepeth the sense though not the words as in this place whether we say Iacob leaning upon his staffe or turning to the beds head worshipped the principall sense is kept that Iacob worshipped God especially seeing the same word with very little alteration in the points signifieth both a bed and a rod or staffe 2. Hieromes observation then is good though Pererius without cause misliketh it Diligentius observandum est c. It is to be diligently observed that where the Apostles and Evangelists doe cite testimonies out of the old testament they follow not the words but the sense and where the Septuagint differ from the Hebrew they expresse the Hebrew sense for the Apostle in this place keepeth the Hebrew sense that Iacob worshipped God leaning upon his bed and staffe for it is true that Iacob did both that he reared himselfe upon his staffe towards the beds head 3. The Apostle then rather expoundeth than alleageth that text for he nameth Iacob whereas Moses saith Israel he speaketh of Iacobs worshipping when he had blessed his children but here Iacob worshippeth before he blessed them 4. This then is no good argument the Apostles follow the Septuagint where they keepe the Hebrew sense though not the words Ergo the Latine text must be received where it differeth both in sense and words from the originall 6. Places of morall use 1 Mor. That none should live idly without some honest trade or vocation Vers. 3. WHat is your trade or what is your worke Pharaoh as a prudent Prince examineth Iosephs brethren of their manner of living and occupation by the which question it appeareth that he condemned all idle persons that lived without any trade and it is the part of good Magistrates straitly to fift and examine all such as spend their time unthriftily not in any profitable labour according to the Apostles doctrine that they which doe not worke should not eat 2 Thes. 3.10 Muscul. 2. Mor. A poore life in the Church of God is to be preferred before the pleasures of the world Vers. 3. THy servants are shepherds Ioseph taught his brethren thus to say that they might dwell apart by themselves and not be imployed in Pharaohs court or in the affaires of the kingdome they did choose rather to live as poore shepheards in the service of God than to be in the kings Palace as strangers from the Church and houshold of faith though Ioseph had a speciall grace given him of God not to be corrupted with that place of honour yet he saw it not to bee meet nor convenient for his brethren Calvin so the Prophet David saith A day in thy courts is better than a thousand elsewhere Psal. 84.10 Moses likewise did choose rather to suffer adversity with the people of God than to enjoy the pleasures of sinne for a season Heb. 11.25 3. Morall Men called to honour should not despise their parents Vers. 7. IOseph also brought Iacob and set him before Pharaoh Ioseph though of honourable place in Egypt yet was not ashamed of his poore aged father but presented him to the King to this Ioseph many are unlike in these dayes that thinke it a disgrace unto them to acknowledge their poore parents Muscul. So did not David who brought his father and mother to the King of Moab to keepe them and provide for them 1 Sam. 22.4 as Ioseph here setteth his father before Pharaoh 4. Morall Our life here is but a pilgrimage Vers. 9. THe dayes of the yeares of my pilgrimage Thus not only Iacob but the rest of the fathers counted themselves but as strangers and pilgrims in the earth and thereby declared that they sought a Countrey Heb. 12.13 14. So the Apostle againe saith We have not here a continuing Citie but seeke for one that is to come Heb. 13.14 and

said It was necessary that Pharaoh should not hearken unto Moses because the Lord had foretold so much who cannot be deceived But Pharaoh was not forced or compelled thereunto there is then an absolute or violent necessity which forceth and compelleth there is a conditionall and hypotheticall necessity when a thing is said to be necessary another thing presupposed so Pharaohs disobedience and obstinacy was the second way necessary upon the presupposall of Gods prescience but the first way it was not necessary the first necessity is coactive but the second is voluntary the other neither justifieth a man if he doe well being forced no● condemneth him if hee doe evill but the second hath place in both both the righteous have praise whose obedience in respect of Gods ordinance is necessary and infallible and the wicked are justly condemned who sinne willingly though Gods prescience considered in some sort also necessarily Borrh. 5. Places of controversie and confutation 1. Confut. Against those that impugne the deity of Christ. Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God Hence certaine Heretikes as Nestorius that did separate the humanity of Christ from his divine nature would confirme their heresie that the man Christ was God no otherwise than Moses is called God as Eliphandus a Bishop of Spaine who held that the man Christ was onely the Sonne of God by adoption Contra. 1. The name of God in Scripture is given unto men as Psal. 80. I said ye are Gods but that title is given them in respect of their office but it agreeth unto Christ by nature for here the Lord is said to have appointed Moses God not to have begotten him as Hilarie well noteth neither is he simply called God as Christ is but with an addition Pharaohs God 2. Not onely the name of Elohim God is given unto Christ but Iehovah which is a name not communicable unto any creature but peculiar unto God and if Christ were no otherwise God than Moses was it were Idolatry to worship him Simler 3. Hilarie also sheweth that Christ is said to be five wayes very God which agree unto none but him 1. in name he is simply called God as Iohn 1. The word was God and 1. Epist. Ioh. 5.20 speaking of Jesus Christ he saith the same is very God 2. By his nativity and generation and so he is called the Sonne of God 3. By nature hee is one with God I and the father are one 4. In power all power is given me in heaven and in earth Matth. 20. 5. By his owne profession he professed himselfe to be the Sonne of God and therefore the Jewes went about to kill him because he said that God was his Father Iohn 5.18 Hilar. lib. 7. de trinitat 2. Confut. Against transubstantiation Vers. 13. AArons rod devoured their rods The Papists would establish their transubstantiation by this place for as Aarons rod being turned into a serpent is still called a rod not because it was so now but for that it had beene so so the bread in the Eucharist after it is converted into the body of Christ is called bread still because it was so before Contra. 1. If they could shew Scripture to warrant the conversion of the bread into Christs body as here is an evident text for the turning of the rod into a serpent they should say somewhat but untill they can doe that their error can have no colour from hence 2. Beside Aarons rod is so called not only because it had beene a rod before but it was to returne to be a rod againe but they will not have the body of Christ returne againe to be bread Simler In the questions before handled the 27. and 28. concerning the power of Satan in counterfeiting the spirits of the dead one question of purpose there handled by Pererius touching the apparition of Samuel raised by the Pythonisse 1. Sam. 28. I of purpose there omitted reserving it for this place of confutation 3. Confut. That Samuel himselfe appeared not to Saul but the Devill in his likenesse 1. THe most of that side are of opinion that it was the very soule of Samuel not raised up by the witches enchantments but God interposing himselfe did prevent her superstitious invocations and sent Samuel to declare his judgements to Saul sic Thostatus Cajetanus Pererius and their reasons are these First because the Scripture saith it was Samuel 2. Hee saith as the Lord spake by my hand vers 17. which was true of Samuel not of the Devill in the likenesse of Samuel 3. Hee foretelleth what should happen unto Saul the next day which the Devill could not doe 4. In Ecclesiasticus it is written that Samuel after his sleepe told of the Kings death chap 46.20 Ferer Contr. 1. The Scripture speaketh according as the thing appeared not as it was as Pharaoh in his dreame is said to have seene kine come out of the river Gen. 4.1 2. which were but representations of kine 2. As the Devill tooke upon him Samuels person so he also counterfeiteth his speech it was not true out of the Devils mouth no more was it true Samuel such counterfeit speech became a counterfeit Samuel 3. The Devill might either by certaine conjectures perceiving in what distresse Saul was and that God had forsaken him gesse what the successe of the battell should be or rather God herein might force him to speake the truth as did the false Prophet Balaam Borrh. 4. The authority of the booke of Ecclesiasticus doth not presse us and Augustine doubteth also thereof affirming that it was not in Canone Hebraeorum The Hebrewes received it not into the Canon of Scripture lib. de cura pro mortuis chap. 18. 5. Neither is there the like reason of Gods preventing the witches enchantments and Balaams divinations for that God did to his further glorie to shew his power in making the false Prophet to be an instrument of the trueth but this had beene contrary to Gods owne law who forbiddeth that any should aske counsell of the dead Deut. 18. Borrh. 2. Some doe goe further and thinke that the Devill might have power also to bring up Samuels body as Satan transported Christs body to the top of the pinacle Contra. 1. There is not the like reason betweene the transporting of the bodies of the living and of the dead which are asleepe and at rest 2. Satan had no power over Christs body but hee yeelded himselfe to Satans temptation that hee might overcome him in his owne weapon and this was permitted unto Satan to doe for the glorie of God the comfort of his members the confusion and victory over Satan but if Satan should be suffered to take up the bodies of the Saints neither God should receive honour by it nor the Church profit and beside Satan thereby would strengthen his Kingdome of darkenesse Borrh. 3. Wherefore the sounder judgement is that it was not the spirit of Samuel but of Satan that appeared to Saul who can transforme

all kinde of league and entercourse is not forbidden with nations of stranger religion there be foedera commerciorum causa leagues for traffike sake and other common necessary things which belong unto the life which kinde of league may be made with such but not foedera auxiliatoria leagues of mutuall helpe Simler Calvin See more hereof chap. 23. qu. 50. QUEST XXVI Why their images were to be broken downe Vers. 13. ANd breake their images in peeces 1. This they were commanded to doe ut non rema●eat memoria c. that there should no memory remaine of idolatry Lyran. For looke what was left of those superstitious monuments tantundem fomenti remaneret so much leaven remained to corrupt pure religion Gallas 2. So that it is evident that these things were not to be transferred to Gods service as though it were lawfull to worship the true God after that manner wherein they worshipped their false gods for this is added as a reason Thou shalt not bow downe to any other god therefore si Iehovam in statuis colore vis Deum alienum colis if thou wilt worship God by images thou dost worship a strange god Simler For the true God will be worshipped after that manner which he hath prescribed Marbach Here then is the errour of the Romanists that doe worship God after the superstitious rites of the Heathen 3. Beside if images must be broken downe then it is not lawfull to retaine them still though they be not professedly adored for the very occasion of offence and stumbling must be taken out of the way as Hezekiah brake downe the brasen serpent which the people had superstitiously abused this then maketh strongly against them that tolerate images in their Churches though they adore them not QUEST XXVII To what use images being pulled downe may be converted 4. THe gold and silver which came of these images it was not lawfull for them to convert to their owne private use Deut. 7.26 they are forbidden to bring any such abominable thing into their house Tostat. qu. 12. Yet to publike uses either for the service of God or for the Commonwealth they might be converted as the gold and silver and the spoile of Jericho was put to the Lords treasury Iosh. 6.19 though it were sinne in Achan to take that which he purloined to his owne private use Simler 5. It is not safe that such monuments of superstition should still be kept though the use be discontinued as it hath fallen out in some places in our times that images having beene laid aside and not defaced were set up againe when idolatrie was revived the saying is that He that will not have a Storke returne to his house must pull downe her nest Simler And here in England if those superstitious cels of Monkes had not beene pulled downe it is to be feared that those uncleane birds would have setled themselves in their nests againe The things then consecrate to idolatrie being so defaced as that they cannot returne to their former use may be converted to some other publike service QUEST XXIX To whom it belongeth to pull downe images Vers. 13. BReake their images in peeces 1. It is not sufficient then for idolatry by the preaching of the Word to be pulled out of mens hearts as some affirme but the Magistrate is commanded by his authority to remove all such stumbling blockes as the good Kings of Judah Ezechiah and Iosiah did and the good Christian Emperours Constantinus and Theodosius 2 And this belongeth not to any private man to doe but to leave it to the Magistrate to whom the Lord hath committed this authority to reforme publike abuses yet in their private families men may reforme their housholds as Iacob caused all in his house to remove from them their strange gods Gen. 35.2 3. And further as it is not lawfull for private men by their private authority to take upon them the publike reformation in abolishing reliques of superstition as it was decreed in the Eliberine Councell that if any man breaking downe an image were slaine in the very act doing he should not be counted a Martyr and Theodoret writeth of one A●das a Bishop who overthrew Pe●sarum pyraema the temple of the Persians wherein they worshipped fire which fact he commendeth not but approveth his constancie in that he chose rather to suffer punishment than to restore idolatrie yet notwithstanding they fall not under this censure who being private men instinctu Spiritus excitantur are stirred up by the instinct of Gods Spirit and moved with an heroicall spirit to doe any such publike act as Ambrose Epist. 29. defendeth a certaine Bishop which had set on fire a Synagogue of the Jewes and another which under Iulian the Emperour was put to death for pulling downe an Altar So some among us and in other places have beene moved by the like spirit to shew their detestation against idolatry publikely in defacing of images and disgracing the Masse who are not rashly to be condemned Simler QUEST XXX How the Lord is said to be a jealous God Vers. 14. WHose name is Iealous a jealous God 1. Thomas Aquin. defineth jealousie to be Intensus amor non patiens consortium in amato A fervent love not suffering any fellowship in that which is loved and it is of two sorts either in that which is good as to be jealous of Gods honour and in this sense the Apostle saith It is good to love earnestly alwayes in a good thing Gal. 4.18 and this is a good zeale or jealousie and thus the Lord is said to be jealous as a man is over the chastity of his wife that his people should not commit spirituall fornication There is a jealousie in other outward things as in the honours of this life as Saul was jealous over David for the Kingdome and this is an evill jealousie 2. Sometime one is jealous for himselfe as the husband is over his wife that shee might be chaste unto him sometime for another as a good servant is jealous in his masters absence that his wife may keepe her selfe entire unto his master as Paul was jealous over the Corinthians with a godly jealousie to keepe them as a pure virgin for Christ 2 Corin. 11.2 The Lord is jealous both these wayes in respect of himselfe quia non potest habere parem c. the Divine nature can indure no equall Cajetan And he is said to be jealous Si quosdam ex suis viderit in sere perditos If he see any of his to fall away from his worship and so be lost Cyril 3. But God is jealous not as man is jealous Non humana perturbationis vitio facit Deus God is not jealous with any perturbation of minde as man is being unchangeable in himselfe Augustin Caret affectionibus Deus c. God is without affections but he is said to be jealous because he would not have any that hath knowne him to be carried away into