Rabble Lord High Steward Is it your Lordships pleasure to Adjourn Lords Ay Ay. Lord High Steward Then this House is Adjourned to the Parliament Chamber Then the Lords withdrew in their former Order and the Committee of Commons went back to their House Mr. Speaker resumed the Chair A Message was sent from the Lords by Sir Timothy Baldwyn and Sir Samuel Clarke Mr. Speaker The Lords have commanded us to acquaint this House that they have appointed William Viscount Stafford to be brought to the Bar in Westminster-Hall to morrow morning at Ten of the Clock to receive Judgment The Commons Adjourned to Eight of the Clock the next Morning The Seventh Day Tuesday December 7. 1680. ABout the hour of Eleven the Lords Adjourned into Westminster-Hall going thither in their former Order into the Court there erected and Mr. Speaker having left the Chair the Committee of Commons were seated as before The Lords being sate Proclamation was made for Silence and the Lord High Steward being seated on the Wool-pack with Garter Principal King of Arms the Usher of the Black Rod Nine Maces attending him with all the rest of the Solemnity as was at first expressed took the Votes of the Peers upon the Evidence beginning at the Puisne Baron and so upwards in this Order the Lord Stafford being as the Law requires absent Lord High Steward My Lords I am an humble Suitor to your Lordships That you will give me leave to collect your Votes as I sit for I am not able to stand Which being granted the Lord High Steward proceeded Lord High Steward My Lord Butler of Weston Is William Lord Viscount Stafford Guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Impeached or Not Guilty Lord Butler Not Guilty upon my Honour The same Question was put to the rest whose Names and Votes follow Lord Arundel of Trerice Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Crewe Guilty upon my Honour Lord Cornwallis Guilty upon my Honour Lord Holles Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Wootton Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Rockingham Guilty upon my Honour Lord Lucas Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Astley Guilty upon my Honour Lord Ward Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Byron Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Hatton Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Leigh Guilty upon my Honour Lord Herbert of Cherbury Guilty upon my Honour Lord Howard of Escrick Guilty upon my Honour Lord Maynard Guilty upon my Honour Lord Lovelace Guilty upon my Honour Lord Deincourt Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Grey of Wark Guilty upon my Honour Lord Brook Guilty upon my Honour Lord Norreys Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Chandos Guilty upon my Honour Lord North and Grey Guilty upon my Honour Lord Pagett Guilty upon my Honour Lord Wharton Guilty upon my Honour Lord Eure. Guilty upon my Honour Lord Cromwell Guilty upon my Honour Lord Windsor Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Conyers Guilty upon my Honour Lord Ferrers Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Morley Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Mowbray Not Guilty upon my Honour Lord Viscount Newport Guilty upon my Honour Lord Viscount Faulconberge Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Conway Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Berkley Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Maslesfield Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Hallifax Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Feversham Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Sussex Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Guilford Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Shaftsbury Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Burlington Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Ailesbury Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Craven Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Carlisle Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Bath Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Essex Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Clarendon Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of St Albans Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Scarsdale Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Sunderland Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Thanet Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Chesterfield Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Carnarvan Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Winchelsea Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Stamford Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Peterborough Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl Rivers Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Mulgrave Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Barkshire Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Manchester Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Westmorland Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Clare Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Bristol Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Denbigh Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Northampton Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Leicester Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Bridgwater Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Salisbury Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Suffolk Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Bedford Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Huntingdon Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Rutland Not Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Kent Guilty upon my Honour Earl of Oxford Guilty upon my Honour Lord Chamberlain Not Guilty upon my Honour Marquess of Worcester Not Guilty upon my Honour Duke of Newcastle Not Guilty upon my Honour Duke of Monmouth Guilty upon my Honour Duke of Albemarle Guilty upon my Honour Duke of Buckingham Guilty upon my Honour Lord Privy-Seal Guilty upon my Honour Lord President Guilty upon my Honour Lord High Steward Guilty upon my Honour Prince Rupert Duke of Cumberland Guilty upon my Honour Lord High Steward My Lords upon telling your Votes I find there are Thirty one of my Lords that think the Prisoner Not Guilty and Fifty five that have found him Guilty Serjeant make Proclamation for the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring his Prisoner to the Bar. which was done and his Lordship came to the Bar. Lord High Steward My Lord Stafford I have but heavy tidings for you your Lordship hath been Impeached of High-Treason you have pleaded Not Guilty my Lords have heard your Defence and have considered of the Evidence and their Lordships do find you Guilty of the Treason whereof you are Impeached Lord Stafford Gods Holy Name be praised my Lords for it Lord High Steward What can your Lordship say for your self why Judgment of Death should not be given upon you according to the Law Lord Stafford My Lords I have very little to say I confess I am surprized at it for I did not expect it but Gods will be done and your Lordships I will not murmur at it God forgive those that have sworn falsly against me My Lords I conceive I have something to say for respit of Judgment I have been at many Tryals in my Life but I never saw any Tryal where the party tried did not hold up his Hand which I was never asked to do I thought it had been a very material point in the Law That by the holding up of the Hand he might be known to be the Person I have read lately since I had the misfortune to be thus accused Sir Edward Coke upon the Pleas of the Crown and he says that Misnomer the not giving a man
that Resolution Mr. Dugdale Yes I heard every one give their particular full assent At which there was a great Hum L. H. Steward What is the meaning of this For the Honour and Dignity of publick Justice let us not carry it as if we were in a Theatre Mr. Dugdale My Lords Some times in September my Lord Stafford being at Mr. Abnets House in Stafford came once upon a Sunday morning to hear Mass I meeting him at the outward Gate of my Lord Aston's House when he alighted off his Horse after some Discourse he turned to me and told me It was a sad thing we could not say our Prayers but in an hidden manner but e're long if things took effect we should have the Romish Religion established And I at that time did seem to be and really was as glad as any person could be After some time I think it was about the 20. or 21. of September my Lord Stafford sent for me into his lodging Room I think it was by his page or him that waited upon him in his Chamber and he told me I must come to my Lord and I immediately went to his Lordship he was just then arising and dressing he sent his men out and told me he had had a good Accompt from Mr. Evers and other Genlemen that I would be faithful and true to their Intentions about the introducing their Religion He told me he was likewise concerned himself and that in a very high degree and for taking away the Life of the King he offered me at that time for my Charges and Encouragement 500 l. and that I should go in October after to London with him my Lord Stafford and that I should be with him sometimes at London and sometimes at an House of my Lord Aston's about twenty five miles from London and that I should be under the care of him in London and Mr. Ireland and in the Countrey of one Mr. Parsons that knew of the Design I did then shew as much resolution to be faithful to my Lord as I could and that I would be true to what my Lord then engaged me I after went to Mr. Evers and communicated to him what my Lord Stafford said and was something in admiration at my Lord 's offering me such a Sum of Money for I doubted of my Lords Ability to make good Payment He told me that I need not sear it for Mr. Harcourt and Mr. Ireland had Money enough in their hands to defâ—ay that and other Charges and I should not want Money for the carrying it on My Lords I remember that at another time there was a meeting wherein there was a Debate about my going up and other businesses my Lord Stafford was present and there were several there besides I did not knâ—w them all then but in the first place they told me I should be made equal with one Captain Adderly that is since dead and that I should have a Reward in London I understood that the Duke of York my Lord Arundel and my Lord Bellasis and others were to give me it and speaking of the Rewards to those that were ingaged they said there would be Land enough from the Protestants to satisfie all that acted in the Design Another time my Lord Stafford discoursing in a Dining Room in my Lord Aston's House did express his great Zeal and the reason why he was such an Enemy against the King he said both he and my Lord Aston had been great Sufferers for the King and for his Father and that my Lord in particular his Grandfather or his Father had spent 30000 l. in the Kings Service and had no Recompence that he had always shewed himself Loyal to the King but whenever there came any place of Preferment to be disposed of it was rather given to such as had been Traytors and Rebels to the old King and likewise to the King himself than to any that had been had Loyal He said this was his chief Motive if there were not Religion in the Case which was of an higher nature or to that purpose L. H. Stew. When was this last Discourse Mr. Dugdale In September 78. as near as I remember for we had several Discourses L. H. Stew. This was not the time you were at my Lords Chamber Mr. Dugdale No it was in my Lord Aston's Dining Room L. H. Stew. No nor when he sent for you to offer you the 500 l. Mr. Dugdale No not at that time it was another time L. H. Stew. What Month and Year Mr. Dugdale September 78. my Lord. Mr. Foley I desire he may give your Lordships an account what assurance he had of Pardon if he did succeed Mr. Dugdale I was told I need not fear and particularly my Lord Stafford told me I should have a free Pardon for it for the King had been Excommunicated and was likewise a Traytor and a Rebel and an Enemy to Jesus Christ L. H. Steward But how could you be Pardoned From whom were you to have that Pardon Mr. Dugdale I was to be Pardoned by the Pope L. H. Stew. That was for your Sins Mr. Dugdale Yes I expected no other if I had gone on Mr. Treby Were you promised nothing else but a Pardon from the Pope Mr. Dugdale Yes I was to be Sainted Sir Will. Jones Will his Lordship please to ask him any Questions we ask him no more Mr. Foley Yes I desire another Question may be asked him that he would give an account of the Letters my Lord Stafford writ to Evers about the Design L. H. Stew. What say you to that Question Mr. Dugdale There came a Letter to Evers from my Lord Stafford I knew it to be my Lords hand some might counterfeit his hand but as near as a man can swear to the hand of another in a Paper he did not see written that was my Lords-hand That things went all well beyond Sea and so he did hope they did here for the carrying on of the Design it was to this purpose expresly Mr. Treby We have done my Lords with him Lord High Steward My Lord Stafford will you ask him any Questions L. Staff My Lords I have divers Questions to ask him very many but I humbly crave your Lordships Directions if I ask him any Questions now whether I may not ask him some afterwards L. H. Steward My Lord you may ask Questions of the Witnesses as often as you please and when ever you find it useful to you God forbid there should be any time to foreclose a man from asking a Question that may save his life L. Staff I pray he may be asked how long before this time he knew of the Plot. L. H. Steward How long have you known this Plot Mr. Dugd. In general for the introducing of the Popish Religion and the incouragement to it by the Duke of Yorks being Successor I have known it 15 or 16 years by the means of Mr. Evers L. Staff My Lords I understand him he says
L. Stafford Of Dr. Oats that was read in your Lordships House I heard it L. H. Stew. Let us understand your Lordships demands that when my Lords are withdrawn I may know what Questions to put to them and acquaint them with your desires The one is the Journal of the Lords House which is always before their Lordships and you might have had Copies long since The next thing you ask is an Affidavit of Dugdale if this Affidavit is entred into the Journal that supplies your Demands if it be not entred there where shall we find it L. Stafford I do not know L. H. Stew. Does your Lordship think all this matter must stay till we can find a loose Affidavit that we know not where 't is filed L. Stafford I know it was before the Council and I believe my Accusers have it I desire the Gentlemen of the House of Commons may produce it Sir John Trevor I have seen none nor have none L. Stafford The one was taken the 24. of December this time two year and the other the 29. L. H. Stew. My Lord will your Lordship give me leave to tell you you ought to be provided with some particular exception and not to make your demand in general If your Lordship will say Dugdale did swear such and such things which are contrary to what he now affirms we know what to make of it but to hunt after an Affidavit that we know not where to find to pick something out of it that I do not understand L. Stafford I appeal to my Lord of Essex and my Lord Bridgewater whether they did not examine me the first time upon one or two Affidavits of Dugdale L. H. Stew. Suppose it be not to be found my Lord L. Stafford Then I must have patience and submit L. H. Stew. Can you tell wherein he swore quite blank contrary to what he swears now L. Stafford My Lord I conceive it was never denied before but your Lordships may do what you please L. H. Stew. Well my Lord let us go on to the next The Affidavits of Dugdale if they be entred on the Journal may be ready if not thenâ— shall acquaint their Lordships and they will direct what is fit in the case L. Stafford Then there is the Affidavit of Oats before my Lord Chief Justice upon which I was committed the next day which was Friday it was read in your Lordships House L. H. Stew. I believe that is entred upon the Journal and so will be ready to be used L. Staff I do hope to make it evidently appear thereby that he is forsworn I desire two Affidavits more that were taken before the Justices of the Peace of Middlesex who examined Mr. Turbervile twice L. H. Stew. What Justice of the Peace L. Staff Mr. Warcupp Sir William Poultney and Sir Thomas Stringer I desire I may not be misunderstood I do not desire to have them to instruct my Counsel or advise with them upon them but I cannot make my Defence without them L. H. Stew. Those are voluntary extrajudicial Affidavits that no body is bound to keep L. Staff They were spoken of in the Votes of the House of Commons L. H. Steward What say you Gentlemen to it Sir Fran. Winn. My Lords because my Lord at the Bar is pleased to insinuate as if we knew where those Affidavits are which he seems to desire and because your Lordship was pleased to say that the Commons in Parliament are the Grand-Jury of the Kingdom I desire to say one thing That certainly it will not be required from us to produce and publish the several Facts and Circumstances that induced us to impeach him if it shall be demanded by the Prisoner at the Bar. L. H. Steward I wish you would answer the Question and not argue upon it whether those Affidavits of Turbervile may not be produced for 't is my Lords Exception against your Witnesses that he swears several ways and by those Affidavits of Turbervile he intends to disprove him in what he hath said to day Sir Fr. Win. My Lords the House of Commons never administer an Oath and therefore it is not to be said to us but my Lord Stafford must go to the particular Offices where they are to be found L. H. Stew. I do not ask you where my Lord should find them but whether if they can be found you can object any thing why they should not be produced and read Mr. Serj. Maynard When they are produced we will give an Answer L. Stafford My Lords I am informed this is the substance of the Affidavit That Turbervile did swear before two Justices of the Peace whether they be of the House of Commons or no I cann't tell that he spoke with me at Doway and in Paris in the years 73. and 77. and now he says 72. and 75. I am informed my Lords and I appeal to the House of Commons they are all Persons of Honour and Worth if my Information be mistaken I beg their Pardon and yours for 't whether he did not mend it after he had sworn it L. H. Stew. Are these all you do demand L. Stafford Yes my Lords Whether this was true or no I don't know â— is what I have been told I appeal to the House of Commons who are all worthy persons I do not believe I have an Enemy among them they know whether I speak true or no. L. H. Stew. When will your Lordship be ready to make your Defence L. Stafford As soon as ever I have them I will not stay a minute a moment an instant I desire not to shew my Counsel nor any one for my Tryal is a thing that I have long desired Therefore I would not be mistaken as if I would put off the Cause I am innocent and shall be so while I live and hope I shall make it appear so I beg if this be a matter of Law whether I may have them or not that my Counsel be heard to it L. H. Stew. This is a matter of Fact L. Stafford I insist upon it as things without which I cannot make my Defence I am innocent and I suppose not one of the House of Commons nor one of your Lordships will debar me of that by which I may make my Innocency appear Lord High Steward You cannot know my Lords pleasure till they are withdrawn Sir William Jones Before your Lordships withdraw I hope you will please to hear us a few words which we think may be for the Service of this Court. My Lords what Evidence is before your Lordships 't is in your Lordships pleasure what of that you shall please to communicate to my Lord Stafford but for this Evidence he speaks of as remaining in our hands and which he takes upon himself to appeal to us for admits of another consideration My Lords if we were conscious of any thing in these Affidavits that were for my Lords Advantage and knew where they were we would
I do now L. Stafford I desire my Witnesses may be called to prove it for I conceive it is very material My Lords does he deny it Mr. Dugd. I do say there was a Consult at Tixal in August but I did not charge your Lordship positively to be there then nor with more than I do now L. Staff I think you did and I have witnesses to prove it And 't is impossible for any man living to defend himself if persons shall swear as they suppose think or remember I tell your Lordships I was not there in all the month of August L. H. Stew. Does your Lordship intend to call any Witnesses L. Stafford My Lords I thought I had more Witnesses than I have But I have two here if your Lordships will hear them that he did swear I was at Tixal in August L. H. Stew. Who are they L. Stafford My Daughter Winchester for one and a Lady that is my Kinswoman for another L. H. Stew. Let them stand up they are not to be sworn You don't except against them Gentlemen Sir Will. Jones No let him prove what he can Lady Marchioness of Winchester He did swear that he was to receive his Orders from L. H. Stew. Madam your Ladyship is not upon your Oath but you are under all the obligations of Truth and Honour in the world Lady March Winch. My Lords by the Grace of God I will not speak an untrue word Sir Will. Jones We desire to know this Ladies Name L. Stafford It is my Daughter Winchester Lady March Winch. This Stephen Dugdale did say at the Tryal of Sir George Wakeman That he was to receive Orders from my Lord in June or July when he was to come down and that my Lord was at a Consult at Tixal in August L. H. Stew. Did he say positively in August or in August and September Lady March Winch. No he did not name September Mr. Dugdale My Lords I might say my Lord was to come down then but not that ever I said he was there but as now L. H. Stew. But she says you did not name September L. Stafford Here is another Lady Sir Will. Jones Who is she my Lord L. Stafford Mrs. Howard Daughâ—er to Sir George â—lount and married to Mr. Howard a Kinsman of mine she is now a Widow Mrs. Howard My Lords at the Tryal of Sir George Wakeman Dugdale was asked to be positive in the Month my Lord Stafford came down And he said he came down in June or July but he said the Consult was in August wherein my Lord Stafford was L. H. Stew. That Lady likewise says the same That you would not be positive as to June or July but as to August you were positive that my Lord was there Mr. Dugd. No my Lords I only said in August there was a Consult and in June or July my Lord was to come down Mrs. Howard I do assure you we came to that Tryal on purpose to observe every word he said about my Lord Stafford and we have kept it in our memories ever since L. H. Stew. What do you say Mr. Dugdale to it Mr. Dugd. I suppose there was a great many more at that Tryal than these two worthy Ladies and I suppose some of them may remember I said no more than I do now I said then my Lord was to come down at that time and so I said several times but not positively that he was there till the end of August or the beginning of September L. Stafford My Lords I do positively averr here are two Witnesses that say he swore I was there at the Consult in August Now it concerns me to prove that I was not there in August since he said absolutely I was there in August and I assure you I can prove I was not there not all the whole Month. In the beginning of August I came from London from my own House on Tuesday or Wednesday the 6. of August I went to my Lord Bellasis's and that night I went to George Porters the next night I went onwards towards Bath when I was there I went over and staid with my Noble Lord the Marquess of Worcester there I staid two or three days and I went thence to another place hard by there and then I came back again to Bath and went back again afterwards to my Lords House and the first or second of September I went from my Lords House to London Then it this be acknowledged I need say no more if not I 'll prove it by sufficient Witnesses So then I was not there the whole Month of August and the beginning of September he says he spoke with me I was not there till the 12. of September Now I beseech your Lordships how that could possibly be the beginning of September I submit to you whether then he be a Witness fit to be heard that shall sweat positively what hath no colour of truth in it I also leave to you And if they object I was not where I say I was in August I will prove it And for the 20. and 21. of September I do own something of that and I shall prove to your Lordships what it was L. H. Stew. Call what Witnesses you please my Lord. L. Stafford My Daughter proves when I went out of Town Lady March Winch. My Lords it was on a Tuesday my Father went to my Lord Bellasis he dined there and then went on to George Porters L. Stafford That I was at Bath I shall call Witnesses L. H. Stew. My Lord you should prove when you first came to Tixal my Lord Aston's L. Staff Will that satisfie your Lordship L. H. Stew. Me 'T is not me you are to satisfie but my Lords and the Gentlemen of the House of Commons L. Staff Then I do own to your Lordships I came the first time the 12 th of September to Tixal L. H. Stew. That was the first day you were there L. Staff That Year my Lord it was Sir Will. Jones Prove it L. Staff Does he deny that my Lords L. H. Stew. Do you deny that my Lord came first to Tixal the 12. of September Or do you know he was there before Mr. Dugdale My Lords I have positively spoke to no day but only to the 21. or 20. of September L. Staff Where is my Lord Marquess of Worcester's Servant L. H. Stew. My Lord Stafford it will be best for your Lordship to produce all the Witnesses you have and not to leave any thing undone that you can prove L. Staff But I beseech your Lordships I may ask one Question if I shall name any of the House of Peers as my Witnesses does that exempt them from being Judges L. H. Stew. No my Lord. If your Lordship have any Witnesses among any of my Lords here they may very well testifie for you and yet remain still in the capacity of your Judges for my Lord of Strafford had a great many Witnesses that were Peers Sir John Trevor We
Have you done with Mr. Dugdale L. Stafford Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. Whom will you proceed against next L. Stafford Dr. Oats L. H. Stew. Call Dr. Oats L. Stafford Only give me leave to say one thing my Lords that you were pleased to say I should have Copies of the two Depositions of the Twenty fourth and Twenty ninth of December And I had one to inquire but can't find that of the Twenty ninth Then Dr. Oats stood up L. H. Stew. What say you to Dr. Oats my Lord Lord Stafford This Dr. Oats if your Lordships please I desire may be asked when was the first time he ever saw me in his life L. H. Steward When was the first time Dr Oats you saw my Lord Stafford Dr. Oats My Lords the first time I saw this Gentleman at the Bar was as near as I remember at Mr. Fenwicks L. H. Stew. That was in Drury lane Dr. Oats Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. When was that Dr. Oats That was as near as I remember in June L. H. Stew. Was it that time the Commission you spoke of was delivered Dr. Oats Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. Did you see that Commission Dr. Oats Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. Did you read it Dr. Oats Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. From whom was it Dr. Oats I cannot be positive as to that but as near as I remember it was signed as the rest was signed L. H. Stew. How was that Dr. Oats Johannes Paulus Oliva L. H. Stew. You read it Dr. Oats Yes I did my Lords L. H. Stew. It was a Commission to be Pay-Master of the Army was it not Dr. Oats Yes it was L. H. Stew. And it was delivered to my Lord Dr. Oats Yes it was L. H. Stew. By the Name of Mr. Howard of Effingham Dr. Oats Yes my Lords L. H. Stew. What says your Lordship to this L. Stafford What is it possible for me to say against this I declare to your Lordships in the presence of God I never saw the man in my life I never went by any Name since I had the Honour of being a Peer but by the name of Stafford I never heard of Mr. Fenwick the Jesuit nor by the name Thompson till this Plot was discovered and he taken This you may believe or not if you please but this is as true as I am alive My Lords I desire I may have out of the Journals the Deposition on which I was committed L. H. Stew. Turn to the Journal L. Stafford It was read as I remember Friday 25. Octob. 78. Then the Clerk turned to the Journal and read Die Veneris 25. die Octobris 1678. THe Lord Viscount Stafford acquainted the House That he was informed that there was a Warrant issued out from the Lord Chief Justice of England to apprehend him which he thought fit to acquaint their Lordships with and submitted himself their Lordships Judgment The Lord Chief Justice being present was commanded to give the House an account of the business who said That last night about nine of the clock he received a Letter from the Speaker of the House of Commons dated from the Speakers Chair to come to the House of Commons about business of great concernment Accordingly he attended the House of Commons where the Speaker told him that the House of Commons had receiv'd Accusations of High Treason against five Lords and some Gentlemen and desired him to issue out his Warrants for their Apprehension The Persons were the Earl of Powis Viscount Stafford the Lord Arundel of Wardour the Lord Petres and the Lord Bellasis And upon this he issued out his Warrants for their Apprehension having taken the Examination of Titus Oats upon Oath That the Earl of Powis and the Lord Arundel were brought to him this morning in custody and he advised them to render themselves to the Gatehouse where now they are Upon this the Examination of Oats was read whereby it did appear That the Lord Viscount Stafford was charged to be in a Conspiracy of Treason against the King The Lord Viscount Stafford denyed the Fact and after this withdrew And after a while the House was informed that his Lordship would render himself to the Lord Chief Justice L. H. Stew. This is all that is in the Journal L. Stafford Then my Lords if your Lordships please to remember all of you that were there that I was accused by Dr. Oats whose Depositions I desire to see taken before my Lord Chief Justice that he had seen Letters of mine written to Fenwick Harcourt and some others three or four Jesuits in which I was consenting to the Plot that I had sent my Son to Lisbon yet I would be as kind to the Jesuits as before though there was some difference between us These Affidavits I desire to see which as I take it were read before your Lordships that day L. H. Stew. The Affidavit was taken by my Lord Chief Justice in the House of Commons where he did attend them upon their Summons I know not if the Original were read in the House of Lords or the Copy but it seems it is not entred into the Lords Journal but your Lordship had an Order to take Copies of all things you would have demanded and if you would not I cannot tell what to say to it L. Stafford Truly I could not take a Copy because I did not know where it was I desire my Lord Chief Justice may be asked where it is that is all I desire and I will then go on L. H. Stew. I think Dr. Oats does say at this time that he had seen Letters of your Lordships offering your Correspondence and Assistance L. Stafford If Dr. Oats will own he said no more than is in that Affidavit I am content Lord High Steward Have you any Copy of your own Examination Doctor Oats Dr. Oats Yes my Lords I think I have it here L. H. Stew. Marry that is very well produce it then Do you oppose it Gentlemen Managers No we agree we desire the Truth may come out Then Dr. Oats looking amongst his Papers drew out one and offered it to the Court. L. H. Stew. Is that a true Copy of your first Examination Dr. Oates My Lords I will not swear it but it was given me for a true Copy L. H. Stew. By whom was it given you Dr. Oates I can't remember now 't is two years ago Sir W. Jones Unless we know whence it comes or what authority it hath we cannot consent it should be read L. H. Steward Had you it from my Lord Cheif Justice or any servant of his Dr. Oates I can't tell whether Sir Charles Harbord gave it me or no. Sir Fr. Winn. My Lords Sir Charles Harbord might be of the Committee of Examinations but the Examination for which my Lord asked was not in the Committee nor before the house My Lord chief Justice retired out of the house Virtute Officii took it Now it was very fair in Mr.
the Bar does swear what is said there is true Lord Stafford Then he says there he saw Letters signed by me to Fenwick and others I do humbly desire to know whether that be Evidence or no that a man says he saw Letters and does not say he knew them to be my hand nor what the Letters were in particular nothing that he did prove of it I must appeal to your Lordships to all my Lords to my Lord High Steward and the rest that were of the Council at that time whether Dr. Oats did not positively name some and left ne out at the Council Table And whether Dr. Oats did not say there was no Lord concerned in the Plot and whether some of my Lords did not say so and told some other Lords of it from whom I had it And in order to this desire Sir Philip Lloyd may be examined and if he did not know of my being in it then he hath since forsworn himself L. H. Stew. My Lord I know not where you are nor what you are about are you objecting against Oats upon any Evidence out of the Journal Lord Stafford My Lords I go upon this that hath been read L. H. Stew. Pray my Lord produce your Witnesses that did hear him say any thing and take your advantage of it Lord Stafford I call Sir Philip Lloyd L. H. Stew. Where is Sir Philip Lloyd L. Stafford My Lords I do not know I think he is here I hope he will come Then he appeared amongst the Members of the House of Commons and was called to the Bar amongst the other Witnesses and stood up L. H. Stew. What does your Lordship ask Sir Philip Lloyd L. Staff Whether he was not by when Dr. Oats was asked if there were any Lords concerned in the Plot and he said no and whether he did not tell me so a day or two before I was committed in the Pâ—inces Lodgings L. H. Stew. What say you Sir Philip â—loyd did you ever hear Dr. Oats deny upon his Oath that ever he heard of any Lords that were concerned in the Plot Sir Philip Lloyd My Lords Truly I cannot remember any such thing If my Lord put me in mind of any particular Circumstance or time I may recollect it I must confess I think I have heard such a thing rumor'd but I am so unfortunate I cannot remember any thing positively of it L. Stafford He did tell me so I am sure Sir Philip Lloyd Truly my Lords I would be glad to remember any thing to justifie the Truth but I can't remember this L. Stafford But whether it were so or no your Lordships that were of the Council can tell L. H. Steward My Lord I do not know Your Lordship cannot be refused if you press it to ask any of the Lords of the Council if they remember any such thing that did pass there but if I were there or in the Council I deal plainly with your Lordship I cannot say that there was any such thing said L. Stafford If there be any here that were there besides I desire they may be asked L. H. Stew. If your Lordship will call upon any other of my Lords that were there they will tell you Lord Stafford I do not know who were there I can't call them L. H. Stew. You may ask any of the Lords of the Council who were there that time Dr. Oats was examined Lord Marquess of Worcester My Lords I was not at the Council then but I heard it not there indeed but as a general Report abroad L. Stafford I desire my Lord Privy Seal may tell what he knows of it Lord Privy Seal What is it your Lordship would know of me L. Stafford Whether Oats did not say he had no more to accuse Lord Privy Seal Where my Lord L. Stafford At the Council Table Lord Privy Seal 'T is a very hard thing for me to charge my memory with all the Questions at an Examination we use to refer to the Examinations themselves I have seen some Examinations I wish all were so wherein the Questions are put down as well as the Answers and I cannot charge my memory that he said he had no more to accuse L. Staff I desire then all the Lords of the Council that are here to say whether or no he was not asked this Question particularly by my Lord Chancellor and I desire particularly his Lordship would say whether he can't remember it whether he had any thing to say against some Lords and he answered they were to know of it but God forbid he should accuse them L. H. Stew. When should that be L. Stafford My Lords I can't say the day for I was not in Town But I desire to ask whether you did not ask him upon the first Discovery of the Plot whether he had any thing to say against some Lords L. H. Stew. Do you desire to know whether I asked him this Question if he had any thing to say against some Lords L. Stafford I do not say positively your Lordship but whether that Question was not asked him L. H. Stew. Certainly I should never ask any such Question of any man alive I might ask in general of any Lord but not of some L. Stafford Some or other Lords it was L. H. Steward I don't remember it and 't is impossible for any man living to remember what Questions he did ask two or three years ago upon an Examination L. Stafford I desire I may have leave to ask the Earl of Berkley a Question L. H. Steward What is it you would ask him L. Stafford My Lords I humbly ask his Lordship whether he did not hear Dr. Oats say after he had accused some persons before the Council that he had no more to accuse Earl of Berkley My Lords I had the Honour to be of the Privy Council about the time of the Discovery of the Plot but I do not remember that I heard Dr. Oats say any such thing there L. Staff Or in the House of Lords for I may mistake And therefore I desire my Lord of Berkley would declare what he heard Dr. Oats say before the House of Lords Earl of Berkley Yes my Lords in the Lords House I will tell your Lordships what I remember My Lord Chancellor to the best of my remembrance did ask Dr. Oats at the Bar of the House this Question My Lords desire to know if you can accuse any other Person or Persons of what Quality soever and you are incouraged by their Lordships to Accuse them His Answer was My Lords I have no more to accuse in relation to England but in relation to Ireland I have L. H. Steward That was after he had accused your Lordship my Lord Stafford Sir W. Jones We pray my Lords we may have the favour to ask that very Honourable Lord at what time Dr. Oats said this for the satisfaction of those that are present Earl of Berkley My Lords it was after Dr. Oats had accused my
I do not think we shall need to trouble your Lordships more with this matter that my Lord was lame sometime he is pleased to confess One Witness says that he put his Foot on a Cushion my Lord does not acknowledge that L. Stafford I was never lame at Paris Sir VVill. Jones That a man that is lame does sometimes ease his Foot is no hard Consequence I think L. Stafford I deny I was lame then I walked about the streets of Paris I desire I may not be misunderstood Sir VVill. Jones I must then desire under his Lordships favour if he will not acknowledge it to be within seven years that we may prove it and falsifie his Witness the Page L. Stafford I have gone with a stick to the House I acknowledge it and been lame with weariness Sir Fr. VVinn The Objection went to the Credit of our Witness and therefore we desire to answer it my Lord was not lame as he says for so many years but if we prove that within less time my Lord hath been lame it will take off that Objection from our Witness And we desire a Noble Lord or two of this House may testifie what they know And first the Earl of Stamford who was sworn Earl of Stamford My Lords I think I have not had the honour to sit in this House much above seven years but long since that time I have seen my Lord Stafford come lame into the House of Peers and that is all I can say L. Stafford I have come lame with a stick to the House I say Sir Fr. Winn. My Lords we desire that Noble Lord my Lord Lovelace may be sworn which was done Lord Lovelace My Lords the Account that I can give your Lordships is this I cannot ascertain any time but I am sure and I do declare it upon my Honour and the Oath I have taken that I have seen my Lord Stafford lame in the House of Lords within less than this seven years L. Stafford If he goes home to the Tower he may see me lame but never put my Foot upon a stool Sir Will. Jones My Lords your Lordships will be pleased to remember we did call a Witness one Thomas Launder and the account we had of him was he was gone sick from the Bar he was very sick indeed but being just now brought we desire he may be heard though it be out of time we call him to the Reputation of Holt. Thomas Launder was sworn Sir John Trevor Do you declare to my Lords whether you know Samuel Holt Launder Yes my Lords I do L. H. Steward What do you know of him Launder He is a Smith my Lords L. H. Steward What Reputation is he of Launder Indifferent my Lords Sir William Jones What do you mean by that good or bad speak plainly Launder A Drunken Sot a man that will Drink and Rant and Tear the Ground and sing two or three days or a week together and lose his time Sir Fr. Winn. I would ask this man whether he was summoned as a Witness upon any Tryal in relation to the Plot L. H. Stew. Were you ever summon'd as a Witness about the Plot Launder My Lords I was summon'd concerning my Lord Aston's Tryal and I came up with my Lord Aston's people as an Evidence Sir W. Jones Had you any offer of money and what sum Launder Yes my Lords Sir Fr. Winn. Acquaint my Lords with it L. H. Stew. Who offered it you and when and for what Sir Will. Jones For what was that money offered you Launder The money was not absolutely offered me but I was to have an Horse to ride on and money in my Pocket if I could take off James Ansel Dugdale's Evidence L. H. Stew. Who came and offered it to you Launder I was sent for by Mr. Fox to Tixal Hall and there was my old Lords Brother for one and Mr. Thomas Aston that is this young Lords Brother and Mr. Francis Aston who is my Lords eldest Son were in a Room together and this Thomas Sawyer that was here and more were in the Room when they promised all these things L. H. Steward If you would do what Launder If I would take my Oath that this James Ansell was a Perjured Rogue L. H. Stew. Did all they make you this promise Launder Yes my Lords Mr. Fotey It was a Consult together about taking off the Evidence Sir Will Jones My Lords we have done with our Witnesses if my Lord Stafford please to conclude we are ready to do so too L. Stafford What should I conclude about those Witnesses you have now brought in Sir W. Jones Your Lordship may please to conclude your Evidence we are ready to conclude on our part L. Stafford These new Witnesses must I say what I can say against them presently I cannot do it I know very few of them L. H. Steward Have you any Witnesses here my Lord L. Stafford I cannot possibly have any For I did not know nor guess these people would be brought against me They are persons I know nothing of Ansell I have seen four or five times I may have seen the rest but I do not know them to be able to give an accompt of them L. H. Stew. If you have any Witnesses here to support the credit of your own Witnesses that have been impeached you may call them L. Stafford I have none my Lords L. H. Stew. Will your Lordship recapitulate the material parts of your Defence that the Process may be closed L. Stafford I am very unready for it my Lords Let me ask Mr. VVhitby a Question if I must have no more time Mr. Whitby stood up L. H. Stew. There he is what would your Lordship have with him L. Stafford I do not know the Gentleman Mr. VVhitby Nor I your Lordship Lord Stafford I ask him upon the Oath he hath taken I know he will speak truth whether he did not some years ago tell my Lord Aston that is dead this Lord's Father That Dugdale was a Knave and persuaded him to turn him away I say not it is true but I have heard so and desired him to tell his Son so that he might quit himself of him L. H. Steward What say you Mr. VVhitby Mr. VVhitby My Lords about three or four years ago my Lord Aston that is dead I believe it may be two years last April sent for me to dine with him and when I came thither he told me says he Mr. VVhitby I have sent to you to acquaint you with a thing but I do not believe it before I tell it you What is it said I said he Stephen Dugdale hath acquainted me that you have employed persons upon the Water to destroy my Water said I my Lord I never endeavoured it he said he did believe me then I told my Lord said I Mr. Dugdale is a dishonour to the Family upon this accompt because many times people come for money and he will not let them have it
another Case your Lordships will proceed here only according to your Proofs and your Evidence secundum allegata probata and therefore all we shall say to this is that we hope our Proofs are so clear and evident as will leave no room to your Lordships to believe this Noble Lords Protestations In the next place my Lord is pleased to alledge and withal to lay some weight upon it the voluntary surrendring of himself to Justice and he laid it down as a Rule that as Flight is an argument of Guilt so the Surrendring of a mans self to the Trial of the Law is an argument of Innocency My Lords We admit the Rule generally to be true but in some particular Cases it may be otherwise for a Man that is not very confident of his own Innocency may yet be very confident of the strength of his Party and whether the consideration of the circumstances of Affairs as they then stood and the power and prevalency of the Popish party at that time might not reasonably create such a confidence in this Noble Lord we must leave to your Lordships Judgment My Lords We do conceive that those Persons who contrived Sir Edmundbury Godfrey's Murder had so great Confidence in the favour and protection of some of their Party that they thought themselves able to out-face Justice And we verily believe they intended it as an example to deter all Men from medling so much as with the taking an Examination concerning this Horrid Plot. My Lords I desire to be understood aright in this I lay nothing of the Death of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey to the Charge of this Noble Lord I only use it as an Argument of the presumption of the Popish party at that time My Lords In the next place my Lord Stafford did observe from my Lord Coke that in the Tryals of Treasons we ought very much to guide our Judgments by the Nature and Circumstances of the Fact the Concomitants and subsequents as he termed them with Reference to the Person accused whether they were likely to induce or deter him from such an Attempt and here he was pleased to raise some Arguments from the whole course of his Life and did desire your Lordships to consider those Circumstances therein that might make it improbable or impossible that he should commit a Treason of this Nature He desired also your Lordships to remember that he was descended from an Honourable Family and that his Ancestors were very worthy and very deserving Persons and such as had often ventured their Lives in defence of their Country And here he did likewise mention his own Services to the last King and our present Soveraign in the late Wars It is not my part nor will I derogate any thing from the Merits of this Noble Lord much less from the Honour of his Family but in Answer to this we shall desire your Lordships to consider that this Noble Lord however he is pleased to disown it at present is notoriously known to be a Roman Catholick as they call themselves and such we conceive we have sufficiently proved him to be in the course of our Evidence And as there is nothing in the World so much as a misguided Conscience that can ingage the best of Men into the worst of Actions so we think the Principles of that Religion are such as are more likely to pervert Men from their Duty and Allegiance than any other Religion or Perswasion whatsoever And if the Zeal of this Noble Lord did engage him to endeavour the establishment of that Religion in this Kingdom we may easily believe that his Reason did suggest to him the means by which it must be effected which could be no other but Blood and Confusion My Lords The last thing I shall take notice of is what my Lord Stafford was pleased to say in General as to the Doctrine of Killing and Deposing Princes which his Lordship was pleased to call a private Opinion and not the Doctrine of the Church of Rome But by the way my Lords give me leave to observe that this Noble Lord did upon this occasion fully own and I much commend his Ingenuity in it the reality of the Gun Powder Treason since we know how much that Party have endeavoured to render it Incredible and as length of time hath so fully manifested the particulars of that Execrable Design that it hath brought such as are of that Perswasion to confess the truth of it so we hope this days Tryal will convince both the Age we live in and all Posterity of the Truth and Reality of this present Conspiracy But to go on with that Point from which I did digress I am not I confess much versed in the Canons and Councils of the Church of Rome but my Lords this I know the most famous and celebrated Writers of that Church especially of the Society of the Jesuits have publickly avowed and maintained this Doctrine And we know in all times when there hath been occasion to put it in practice it hath never failed to have been attempted and we likewise know that the Church of Rome and the Pope have always avowed the Acts when they have been done From all which we might very reasonably conclude that it is the Doctrine of that Church so to do But my Lord is pleased to say and admit for Truth That a great many private Writers do hold the contrary I believe it to be so but I do also believe that it is the Policy and Artifice of the Church of Rome to leave this Point of Doctrine in some measure undetermined that so they may make use of it as the occasion serves For if it succeeds then it is owned and justified if it miscarry then the Doctrine is but a private Opinion and the Plot but the Practice of particular Persons that are either desperate or discontented And I am fully of Opinion that This Horrid Conspiracy which is brought this day in Judgment before your Lordships wants nothing but Success to canonize it My Lords As to what concerns the Evidence it hath been so fully stated to You and the Objections that were raised to invalidate it so well answered that I will not trouble your Lordships with any Repitition of what hath been said already All we have further to desire is That your Lordships will please to take our Evidence into your Consideration and to do thereupon what shall be agreeable to Justice Mr. Serj. Maynard My Lords as to Matter of Fact I shall say nothing but only this and I wish it may be spoken with Gratitude to Almighty God that the Discovery of this Plot is rather the Work of God than Man It was first his Act in prevailing upon Oats to make the Discovery and when he stood single almost what came to support his Credit but the Letters of Coleman which were like a Tally to what Oats had said for what Oats informs is in a great part made good by his Letters
the King by his great Seal or little Seal command that Justice should be delaid or denied yet however the Judges shall not obey it but proceed So I hope there is no pretence of delay on my part and the benefit of that Statute shall not be denied me And that Statute of the Great Charter which cost so many of your Ancestors their Lives to maintain I hope you will never go from Now your Lordships Noble Ancestors amongst other things took great care that Justice should be denied or delayed to none and this I desire you to take into Consideration I am in your Lordships Judgment either to be Acquitted or Condemned I hope your Lordships will and I know you will lay your Hands upon your Hearts consult your Consciences and your Honours and then you will do what is Just and Equitable I doubt not My Lords Mr. Oats said I came by the name of Mr. Howard of Essingham but that I did to my Letters sign Stafford surely my Lords if I was ashamed to own my Person I should have been as much ashamed to have owned my Name He says he saw me take a Commission and whether that be an Overt Act your Lordships are to determine Upon the whole matter I conceive there is nothing proved against me but words nor pretended to but only by Oats And whether you will credit a man that so dissembles with God as I have told you I appeal to your Lordships and beg you to consider of it That these Witnesses have sworn for Money if you send to the Exchequer Office and see what Money they have received you will find by the great Sums that 't is so and then I hope you will not allow them to be heard nor credit any that swear for gain I had a Suit in Westminster-Hall that had like to have gone expresly against me only because one of my Witnesses was to gain 8 l. if the Suit went for me But pray consider how much these men have had And for the point that there are not two Witnesses I beseech your Lordships give me leave to put you in mind That not many Years ago you passed an Act against Frauds and Perjuries wherein you were so careful to preserve mens Estates that you required three Witnesses to prove a Will of Goods or Lands above 100 l. and will you allow but one Witness to take away a mans Life for Words Though your Lordships will never commit Treason yet no man can preserve himself from the Misfortune that happens to me of being falsly accused 'T is true my Lords the Managers have given an Answer to the Business of the Money by saying The King may give as liberally as he pleases but to give so great Sums whereby Men Poor before are now become Rich I think will be an Objection against their Credit My Lords I have said what I do think convenient though I think much more might be said by an abler man to your Lordships for the clearing of himself I hope I have done it nay I am confident I have and this I have done for the Memory of that Great and Blessed King who first made me a Peer that it may not be said He did me the Honour Forty Years ago to call me up to this Dignity and I should fly in the Face of his Son in so horrible a manner as these men would make me I do owe it to the Honour of my Father and Mother who I think I may safely say were both Honourable and Worthy Persons My Father was a learned man and a wise man as I may appeal to some of your Lordships who knew him well I say I owe it to their Memory and to the Honour of the Family from whence I sprang which all the world knows what it is And I should be an infamous man to dishonour them so much as to bear their Name and commit Treason My Lords I owe it to my Wife who hath been a very kind Wife to me as ever Man had She is Heiress at Law to the great Estate of that great and unfortunate Man Stafford Duke of Buckingham who was cut offin the Reign of King Henry the Eighth and all his Estate if it were not for that Attainder would have come to her I may be impertinent in telling your Lordships what it was but I do not over-say it when I reckon it would have been at this day Two hundred thousand pounds a Year for it was Seventeen thousand pounds a Year in those days Penny Rent besides other Emoluments This is an extravagant thing to say but 't is true something thereof does remain to her which I now enjoy I owe it to all my Children especially to my Eldest Son who is a young Man and I may say of far better Parts and Hopes than his Father and whom I hope will serve his Country I owe it to all my Friends and Relations for I would not have it said after-my Death my Wife was the Widow of a Traytor I owe it to all these but above all I owe it to God Almighty then when I come to be judged by Him I may give a good account of what he hath intrusted me with that I may not appear as an infamous Man who knows he hath a Body but not his own and yet should throw it and his Soul away together And if I should have committed this Execrable Treason I should have been Guilty of my own Murder First in the committing a Crime worthy of Death and then in not Confessing to save my Life I hold Murder an extraordinary Crime the worst next to Treason And I know if I should not prevent my Death by confessing all I knew I should have been guilty of Self-Murder the worst of Murders I know your Lordships will lay to Heart what an execrable thing Murder is and the Blood of Innocents and I hope there is none of the House of Commons but after this Evidence will clear me I am sure none of them would have me punished for that I am not Guilty of I do not blame these Gentlemen of the House of Commons for Prosecuting nor the first for Impeaching for they had without all doubt Reasons great enough for it upon what Evidence they had before them before they knew what the Witnesses were I know your Lordships will not in the least point vary from Justice or the Law of the Land and I desire you to lay the whole matter to your Hearts I have not the least suspicion of the Partiality of any Man in the House nay I profess if I had an Enemy and he were not here I would beg of you that he might come I have cleared my self before your Lordshships and I hope I shall not be run down by the wicked Rabble which where it will end God knows It began in the late times against my Lord of Strafford and so continued till it ended in that most Execrable Fact one of them that ever was done