Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n steal_v thief_n treasure_n 2,093 5 9.4580 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A67913 The free-born English mans plea for justice: or, A cry against post-fact laws. Being a survey of the controversies touching the late purchased titles through the true perspective of justice. By William Jackson, one who hath lived to see the famine of justice removed, and hopes to see it continue as plentifully amongst us; as food in Samaria; after the flight of these Assirians: 2 Kings, 7. Jackson, William, 1636 or 7-1680. 1660 (1660) Wing J93; ESTC R207910 14,659 20

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

have such true Titles to their Possessions as the Laws of the land shall justifie we cannot think such injustice can be permitted by his Majesty as to suffer them to be expelled contrary to Laws of which his Royal Proclaimation hath given them assurance but if the Laws of the Land wil not Justifie their possessions 't is great injustice they should hold them both to the detriment of those in present that ought to enjoy them and to be an il example or encouragement to others to enrich themselves out of others ruines for the future for without a Buyer there can be no Seller therefore where the Law did not Justifie that Title at the time of bargain In the name of God let Justice frustrate and restore to the just owner according to the true Title and let not our Age seek to justifie wrong by a post fact Law for which these Kingdoms have already felt such sore Judgments one such Law to take the blood of one man in that nature hath been revenged upon the whole three nations with the blood of many and should post fact lawes be now created to take the Estates of those which were not forfeitable by Laws extant at the time of the forfeiture I pray God do not revenge it after the same manner upon the three Nations and lay al of them desolate Rom. 7. 7. What shal we say then is the Law sin God forbid Nay I had not known sin but by the Law for I had not known sin except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet Where there is any forfeiture of an Estate there needs no post fact Law to confirm it for that Law which makes a man an offender hath the forfeiture annexed to it If post fact Laws be allowed Who knows when he does amiss Therefore both dispossessed and Possessors gainers and loosers if ye agree in nothing else agree in this one voyce Fiat Iustitia You would be loath either of you to be accounted unjust ye ought not to be your own Judges the Law ought to be our Judg for as Justice is and ought to be the rule to our Law-makers in making their Laws to shew them what should be Law so should the Law be both to them and us the rule of what is Justice They that fear the Law are partial and of a Tyranous spirit seeking a priviledg for themselves above their fellows whereas Justice and Laws are alwaies general priviledg or punish every man alike in the same case making no difference to any and this is the liberty of the subject to have al in the same capacity with him excepting only such as are impowred with the supream oversight of the whol To prevent those innumerable inconveniences which such should they be in hazard might precipitate the Nation into Nevertheless by that exception are they subjected as much or more to the bond of love for their own strength as they could have been by the penal laws but with far more security to the Nation Seeing therefore that Justice is that general priviledg wherein all Just and equal interests are most priviledged let us with one mind think of no other Plea than that which I hope will be so provided for by his Majesty and the Parliament now sitting that there will be no need of promoting any pleas for it for no man petitions at any time for what he hath but what he wants so that it is the part of every man to rest satisfied in expectation of what is preparing by them whom we should very much injure to think would omit or act any thing that Justice should not require but when any such thing is then promote Pleas for Justice according to the known Laws but in your particular Pleas to make such objections as one is out so much monies and is like to be ruined if he be deprived of what he holds or that such were deboist in their lives On the other side that we are brought to poverty those that possest our estates are so or so these savor more of passion than reason for it they that have gamed the sequestred Estates have them by Law the others poverty is no reason they should loose their right but if the others have lost their Estates without Law There is no equity but that Law should restore them 't is not the debauchery laid to their charge which besides is to be proved as wel as said that excuses any man in anothers right for wherof a man is legally possessed of that he is to be deem'd true owner in the same capacity he was at first invested with til the Law disposess him again and whosoever enters without his consent before such declaration be made by Law hath as much title to it as a Thief on the high way to the money in a mans purse for such entries are not by the right door The Laws of the Land are the right door to all manner of possessions Whoso therefore comes not in by the right door the same is a Thief and a Robber saith Christ And though this may have been a Judgment on such as did set their minds too to much upon this world to wean them from laying up treasures to themselves upon earth where moth and rust do corrupt and Thieves break through and steal they should be so deprived that they might lay up treasures in Heaven c. God send all men to make use of his dispensations to his glory he can renew his Judgments on them when they give him the same provocation But as the Infirmities of men if they be true ought not to bar them of the priviledge of the Law so ought not the excellency of any man or Saint-like Godliness to cal it by the usual word priviledg him to do injustice against Law Nay 't is vehemently to be suspected that where a godly man drives on designs of depriving any man of his right before the Law hath divested him of it that his godliness is but seeming not reall for Justice is the fit foundation to build godliness on Justice may be where godliness is not but godliness cannot be where Justice is not therefore such assertors of their own righteousness may wel be conjectured Pharisee like less Justifiable than the poor dejected Publican for though they are more circumspect in Punctillio's yet they omit the weighty matters of doing Justice Obeying Princes and Laws and this their desire of holding what they have without relation had to the Justness of it very much discovers for we Judg by the fruits not the flowers And whereas these may superficially for a mask of such intrusion plead Orders of Parliament to be the Law that authorized their possession 't is very wel known in England that no order of Parlliament was ever pleaded to be in force longer than the Session of that Parliament which made it but that such orders as they hold necessary to continue were drawn into Acts and confirmed by the