Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heaven_n	exceed_v	righteousness_n	scribe_n	2,764	5	11.0489	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A04187	Iustifying faith, or The faith by which the just do liue A treatise, containing a description of the nature, properties and conditions of Christian faith. With a discouerie of misperswasions, breeding presumption or hypocrisie, and meanes how faith may be planted in vnbeleeuers. By Thomas Iackson B. of Diuinitie and fellow of Corpus Christi Colledge in Oxford.; Commentaries upon the Apostles Creed. Book 4	Jackson, Thomas, 1579-1640.	1615 (1615)	STC 14311; ESTC S107483	332,834	388

present danger or disagrace as not odious in the worlds sight And many scattered delights meeting in one like a multitude of broad shallow streames falling into one deepe narrow channell carry the soule with least interruption of speedy passage into the bottomlesse gulfe Vnited force is alwaies strongest and for this reason it is oft harder to renounce one sinne wherein wee delight much then a great manie we equally affect Freedome from manie vsually breeds secret presumption or indulgence to our delight in some one or few and indulgence bringeth forth hardnesse of heart Of if the worldly wise-man can curbe all his desires from bursting out into knowne euils this aboundantly contents him but so doth it not his God vnto whom this permanent luke-warme ciuill temper symbolizing onely with true religion in abstinence from actuall euill not in feruency of deuotion is more abhominable then the distemperature of publicanes and open sinners accompanied vsually with most vices yet not so firmely wedded vnto any but discouerie of their filthinesse may induce them to be diuorced from all It is much worse to be at the verie entrie into the kings banquet and retire or not goe in than to stay at home and pretend excuses A chaste infidell sayth S. Augustine is not onely lesse prayse-worthy than an incontinent belieuer in that hee is continent without beliefe but rather lyable to greater reproofe in that being continent hee doth not belieue 7. Of such vniformity in practising dueties expresly taught by the rule of faith as hitherto hath beene prosecuted is that most true which the moderne Romanist in no point destitute of one ape tricke or other to mocke God and man with a counterfait shape of true religion misapplies to curious points of speculation bearing men in hand that if they belieue not euerie point of faith alike they belieue none aright Whence many things they teach as necessarie to saluation being intricate and impossible to be conceiued with such euidence or probabilitie as may ground certaintie of faith seely soules are brought to distrust the perspicuitie of scriptures and to repose that confidence in their instructers which they should doe in Gods word and so for feare least they should haue no faith but by belieuing as the Church doth they belieue the Church only not God nor any article of faith as was deliuered in the former booke Nor can their workes if conceiued or begotten by the booke or Iesuiticall rules of life be euer acceptable in Gods sight because not inspired by true and liuely faith vniformely spreading it selfe throughout all their faculties cherishing and strengthening them as the Sunne doth plants to bring forth fruite To speculatiue points or our Assent vnto diuine reuelations as true the former rule is onely then appliable when wilfull contempt or indulgence to our owne affections doth blinde our vnderstanding He that vpon such motiues doubts of any principall article or dis●ents from it rightly belieueth none but if for want either of naturall capacity or particular illumination of Gods spirit hee cannot so firmely Assent vnto some principall truth as others doe to whome they are more fully reuealed so hee demeane himselfe during the time of his dissent or doubt according to that measure of knowledge God hath giuen him his faith may be sincere and sound though not so farre spread as it is in other men 8. But some better minded perhaps will here demaund how farre this vniformity in practise is to be extended as whether a man may not be more prone to one sinne then another or more apt to conforme his will and desires vnto Gods wil in some points of his seruice then in others without preiudice to the sincerity or liueli-hood of his faith If this pronenesse to euill and negligence in good proceed from strength of naturall inclination or long custome his relapse into the one or holding off from the other doth not disproue his obedience in those points wherin faith hath gotten full conquest ouer his desires if his inclinations to his beloued or bewitching sins proportionably decrease or wane as his zeale or deuotion in the points of duty are augmented But euery member of the old man must be mortified ere our faith be euery way such as that whereby the Iust doe liue The manner of whose life by Faith is now necessarily to be discussed more fully then in these present meditations was intended least from some passages in the former discourses the vnobseruant Reader happily suspect the difference betwixt vs and the Romish Church in this controuersie to be but small or to consist rather in words than in substance especially if works be so necessarily included as wee suppose in that faith which iustifies Nor seems it easie to reiect our aduersaries form of doctrine without some preiudice to Saint Iames in whose tearmes their assertions for the most part are conceiued This last preiudice notvvithstanding first remooued wee are to manifest their dissent from vs and from the forme of wholsome doctrine which Gods Word prescribes to bee as great in this question as in anie For admitting their Faith vvere sound and their workes which is before refuted liuely they vtterly inuert the right vse of both and by artificiall sleights or tricks of wit not discouerable by euery eye drawe poore soules from CHRIST the onely end of the Lawe as well morall as ceremonial the sole load starre of Faith and all other sanctifying graces CHAP. VI. Of difficulties arising from the former discourses in the Protestants doctrine of Iustification by faith without workes That faith is as immediately apt to do good vvorkes of euery kinde as to iustifie Of the diuers acceptions of iustification That the iustification by workes mentioned by Saint Iames is presupposed as subordinate to Saint Paules iustification by faith without workes The true reconcilement of these two Apostles contrarie speeches in appearance from the contrarietie of their seuer all ends or intentions 1. SAint Paul as is declared at large before includes workes in faith which Saint Iames takes as hee found it in vnfruitfull hearers destitute of good workes This difference notwithstanding alone considered doth no way salue but rather remooue the seeming contradiction between the one auouching and the other disclaiming iustification by faith without workes and cause it wholy to settle in Saint Pauls assertion or in the doctrine of Protestants thence deriued For whether iustified we be by workes and faith as Saint Iames expresly speakes or by a working saith as Saint Paul implies this faith workes such righteousnes as Saint Iames requires not in others but in our selues Seeing then both faith and the righteousnesse it workes are inherent in vs how are we not iustified by inherent righteousnes if iustified by such a working faith as Saint Pauls commaunds and we haue hitherto described This which we conceiue by way of doubt our Sauiours doctrine seemes to put out of all controuersie Except your righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees yee shall in no case enter into the kingdome of heauen What

righteousnesse doth he here meane Inherent questionlesse for he presseth such an vniforme obseruation of all the Commaundements as Saint Iames doth The Scribes and Pharises did as it euen seems then calumniate him as they afterwards did Saint Paul and the Pontificians do vs stil as a destroier of the Law because he reprooued their confidence in workes and sought to establish the doctrine of faith which we now reach Needfull in this respect was that eaueat Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfill them Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commaundements and shall teach men so he shall bee called the least in the Kingdome of Heauen but whosoeuer shall doe and teach them the same shall be called the greatest If by the kingdome of heauen he meant the kingdome of grace the argument is more strong then otherwise it would be howsoeuer strong it is and not impeached by this reply That such obseruance of the Commaundements as is here required is necessarie to sanctification or saluation not to iustification That it should be more necessary to one of these then to another implies a contradiction in the termes well expressed and equally compared as it doth vnto our Sauiours purpose to say that workes are lesse necessarie before iustification then after it A man in that he is iustified is the immedia●e heire of saluation at the least acquitted from the sentence of death now if we affirme such righteousnesse more necessarie after he is iustified then before we should in congruitie grant that workes win heauen and faith only deliuers from hell or granting iustification to be the passage from death to life eternall the addition of such workes subsequent as were not precedent could be auaileable onely to supererogate some excesse of glory for though wee stood still at the same point where iustification found vs wee should be infallible heires of glorie Or if faith without workes obtaine iustification hauing iustified vs shall it not much more without them lay sure hold on saluation and all the degrees of ioy that do accompanie it Suppose a man should die in the very instant wherein he is iustified none would doubt either of absolution or saluation Is he then saued with workes or without them If without them our Sauiours rule doth faile vs for this man enters into the kingdome of heauen without more strict obseruance of the Commandements then the Scribes and Pharisees vsed without any part of that righteousnesse whereof they in some measure were partakers If with them their presence is necessarie to iustification and in order of nature before it because necessary ere he can be capable of entrance into the kingdome of heauen as performance of euery condition is in nature precedent to the accomplishment of what is not promised without it Againe no man denies but faith inherent in order of nature goes defore iustification in that sence we take it yet iustifying faith necessarily includes such workes in it as Saint Iames requires at the least a preparation or immediate promptnesse of minde to do them and more then so was not in the worke of Abraham which he commends seeing Isaac vvas not actually facrificed but offered vp by faith vnfaigned to bee sacrificed and this worke or rather thus much of it did goe before iustification either as the cause doth before the effect or as the meanes before the end for as Saint Iames sayth he was iustified by it But that perhaps in his language and intent was no more then to bee declared iust So would I answere were I Aquinas his scholler and held iustification to consist in habituall righteousnesse or grace infused Thus Bellarmine very well expounds the like speech of Saint Iohn Hee that doth righteousnesse is righteous Because of his deeds or his workes No but by them he is knowne to be righteous For he is said to be righteous that doth righteousnesse as he that moues is sayd to be liuing or the tree good that beares good fruit yet is not the tree therfore good because it beares good fruit nor doth a man liue because he moues but contrariwise the one moues because he liues the other brings forth good fruite because good so in like manner he that doth righteousnesse is righteous yet not righteous because he doth righteousnes but he doth righteousnesse because he is righteous This answere shaped by him for Saint Iohn would haue better be fitted Saint Iames as the gloze which they put vpon S. Iames would not altogether so il beseeme Saint Iohn That he had meant the second iustification whereby a man receiues increase of grace and is more iust had been harder for vs to disprooue though most improbable for them to affirme But that S. Iames should meane this second iustification as the Trent Councell without any shew of probability boldly auoucheth is manifestly disprooued by his instance in Rahab for the first righteousnesse shee euer wrought was the receiuing of the messengers and sending them out another way and yet by this worke was shee iustified in that sence Saint Iames meant not in the sight of men but of God For the drift of his dispute is to shew that without workes no man can be approoued in Gods sight howsoeuer he may perswade himselfe and others Abrahams and Rahabs workes are but branches of that religion whose practices he had commended to those his disciples as pure and vndefiled before whom Man onely No before God euen the Father The religion it selfe he exemplifies by obseruance of the affirmatiue and negatiue precepts as in visiting the fatherlesse and widowes in their distresse and by keeping themselues vnspotted of the world Bellarmines instance in Abrahams workes euidently refutes their opinion that thinke workes onely declare vs iust his allegation of Rahabs kindnesse or hospitality more forcibly ouerthrowes the Trent Counsell and his owne imagination that Saint Iames should meane the second iustification whereby a man of iust becomes more iust then which nothing can be imagined more contradictory to the Apostles meaning For who can thinke he reputed them for iust whom hee called vaine men in that they had faith without workes the same faith notwithstanding seconded with workes had as our aduersaries contend made them iust not more iust then before for now they were first to become iust being before vniust and transgressors of the Lawe as the Apostle prooues in that they had respect vnto persons The iustification therefore he sought by Rahabs example to bring them vnto vvas if so vve distinguish the first iustification whereby of transgressors they were to become new men in CHRIST and inwardly righteous not in the sight of man but of God for whatsoeuer this Apostle denies of faith without workes he attributes to faith with workes Now it is graunted by