the Scribes and Pharisees yee shall in no case enter into the kingdome of heauen What righteousnesse doth he here meane Inherent questionlesse for he presseth such an vniforme obseruation of all the Commaundements as Saint Iames doth The Scribes and Pharises did as it euen seems then calumniate him as they afterwards did Saint Paul and the Pontificians do vs stil as a destroier of the Law because he reprooued their confidence in workes and sought to establish the doctrine of faith which we now reach Needfull in this respect was that eaueat Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfill them Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commaundements and shall teach men so he shall bee called the least in the Kingdome of Heauen but whosoeuer shall doe and teach them the same shall be called the greatest If by the kingdome of heauen he meant the kingdome of grace the argument is more strong then otherwise it would be howsoeuer strong it is and not impeached by this reply That such obseruance of the Commaundements as is here required is necessarie to sanctification or saluation not to iustification That it should be more necessary to one of these then to another implies a contradiction in the termes well expressed and equally compared as it doth vnto our Sauiours purpose to say that workes are lesse necessarie before iustification then after it A man in that he is iustified is the immediaâ—e heire of saluation at the least acquitted from the sentence of death now if we affirme such righteousnesse more necessarie after he is iustified then before we should in congruitie grant that workes win heauen and faith only deliuers from hell or granting iustification to be the passage from death to life eternall the addition of such workes subsequent as were not precedent could be auaileable onely to supererogate some excesse of glory for though wee stood still at the same point where iustification found vs wee should be infallible heires of glorie Or if faith without workes obtaine iustification hauing iustified vs shall it not much more without them lay sure hold on saluation and all the degrees of ioy that do accompanie it Suppose a man should die in the very instant wherein he is iustified none would doubt either of absolution or saluation Is he then saued with workes or without them If without them our Sauiours rule doth faile vs for this man enters into the kingdome of heauen without more strict obseruance of the Commandements then the Scribes and Pharisees vsed without any part of that righteousnesse whereof they in some measure were partakers If with them their presence is necessarie to iustification and in order of nature before it because necessary ere he can be capable of entrance into the kingdome of heauen as performance of euery condition is in nature precedent to the accomplishment of what is not promised without it Againe no man denies but faith inherent in order of nature goes defore iustification in that sence we take it yet iustifying faith necessarily includes such workes in it as Saint Iames requires at the least a preparation or immediate promptnesse of minde to do them and more then so was not in the worke of Abraham which he commends seeing Isaac vvas not actually facrificed but offered vp by faith vnfaigned to bee sacrificed and this worke or rather thus much of it did goe before iustification either as the cause doth before the effect or as the meanes before the end for as Saint Iames sayth he was iustified by it But that perhaps in his language and intent was no more then to bee declared iust So would I answere were I Aquinas his scholler and held iustification to consist in habituall righteousnesse or grace infused Thus Bellarmine very well expounds the like speech of Saint Iohn Hee that doth righteousnesse is righteous Because of his deeds or his workes No but by them he is knowne to be righteous For he is said to be righteous that doth righteousnesse as he that moues is sayd to be liuing or the tree good that beares good fruit yet is not the tree therfore good because it beares good fruit nor doth a man liue because he moues but contrariwise the one moues because he liues the other brings forth good fruite because good so in like manner he that doth righteousnesse is righteous yet not righteous because he doth righteousnes but he doth righteousnesse because he is righteous This answere shaped by him for Saint Iohn would haue better be fitted Saint Iames as the gloze which they put vpon S. Iames would not altogether so il beseeme Saint Iohn That he had meant the second iustification whereby a man receiues increase of grace and is more iust had been harder for vs to disprooue though most improbable for them to affirme But that S. Iames should meane this second iustification as the Trent Councell without any shew of probability boldly auoucheth is manifestly disprooued by his instance in Rahab for the first righteousnesse shee euer wrought was the receiuing of the messengers and sending them out another way and yet by this worke was shee iustified in that sence Saint Iames meant not in the sight of men but of God For the drift of his dispute is to shew that without workes no man can be approoued in Gods sight howsoeuer he may perswade himselfe and others Abrahams and Rahabs workes are but branches of that religion whose practices he had commended to those his disciples as pure and vndefiled before whom Man onely No before God euen the Father The religion it selfe he exemplifies by obseruance of the affirmatiue and negatiue precepts as in visiting the fatherlesse and widowes in their distresse and by keeping themselues vnspotted of the world Bellarmines instance in Abrahams workes euidently refutes their opinion that thinke workes onely declare vs iust his allegation of Rahabs kindnesse or hospitality more forcibly ouerthrowes the Trent Counsell and his owne imagination that Saint Iames should meane the second iustification whereby a man of iust becomes more iust then which nothing can be imagined more contradictory to the Apostles meaning For who can thinke he reputed them for iust whom hee called vaine men in that they had faith without workes the same faith notwithstanding seconded with workes had as our aduersaries contend made them iust not more iust then before for now they were first to become iust being before vniust and transgressors of the Lawe as the Apostle prooues in that they had respect vnto persons The iustification therefore he sought by Rahabs example to bring them vnto vvas if so vve distinguish the first iustification whereby of transgressors they were to become new men in CHRIST and inwardly righteous not in the sight of man but of God for whatsoeuer this Apostle denies of faith without workes he attributes to faith with workes Now it is graunted by
shall be giuen c. § 3 c 5. p 1. Verse 19 When one heareth the word of the Kingdome and vnderstandeth it not c. ibidem Cha. 18 Verse 15 If thy brother trespasse against thee goe and tell him his fault betweene thee and him c. § 2. c 2. p 9. Cha. 23 Verse 23 Woe be vnto you Scribes and Pharises Hypocrites for ye tith the mint and the rew and all manner of hearbes c. § 1. c 10 p 5. Cha. 25 Verse 44 Lord when saw we thee naked or an hungred c. § 2. c 3 p 5. MARKE Cha. 8 Verse 3 What doth it aduantage a man to winne the whole world and to loose his owne soule § 3. c 7. p 3. Cha. 10 Verse 17 Master what shall I doe that I may possesse eternall life § 3. c 6 p 3. Verse 23 How hardly doe they which haue riches enter into the kingdome of Heauen ibidem Verse 29 Verily I say vnto you there is no man that hath left house or brethren for my Names sake c. § 3. c 8. p. 5. Cha. 12 Verse 33 Thou art not farre from the Kingdome of God § 2. c 6. p 3. Cha. 13 Verse 13 Yee shall bee hated of all men for my Names sake § 3 c 3. p 4. Cha. 16 Verse 17 These signes shall follow them that beleeue In my name shall they cast out diuels they shall speake with new tongues c. § 1 c 11. p 5 LVKE Cha. 5 Verse 39 No man that drinketh old wine straightway desireth new c. § 1. c ◠p 2. Cha. 6 Verse 22 Blessed are ye when men hate you and separate you c. § 3. c 7 p. 5. Cha. 8 Verse 15 That which fell in good ground are they which with an honest and good heart c. § 3. c 8. par Cha. 12 Verse 33 Prouide your selues bagges which wax not olde c. § 3. c 8 p 6. Verse 48 To whom much is giuen of him much shall be required § 3. c 4 p. 3. Cha. 14 Verse 8 9 When thou art bidden of any man to a wedding c. § 3. c 7 p 1. Verse 12 13 When thou makest a dinner or a supper c. § 2. c 2. p 8 Verse 33 Whosoeuer denieth not himselfe and for saketh all he cannot be my Disciple § ◠c 3. p 5. Cha. 18. Verse 14 Euery one that exalteth himselfe shall bee brought low § 1 c 10. p ◠§ 3. c 7. p 1 Cha. 21 Verse 36 Watch therefore and pray alwaies c. § 2 c 9. p 4. IOHN Cha. 2 Verse 24 Many when they saw his miracles beleeued in him c. § 1. c. 11. p 1. Cha. 3 Verse 15 VVhosoeuer beleeueth in him shall not perish but haue euerlasting life § 1. c 8. p 7. Cha. 4. Verse 34 It is my meate and drinke to doe my fathers will and finish his worke § 1. c 10. p 1. Cha. 5 Verse 44 How can yee beleeue which receiue honour one of another c. § 1. c 11. p 1. Verse 46 Had you belieued Moses you would haue belieued mee c. § 2. c 3. p 2. Cha. 6 Verse 14 Of a truth this is that Prophet which should come c. § 2. c 1 p. 5. Cha. 7 Verse 38 Hee that belieueth in mee as the Scripture hath said out of his belly c. § 1. c 11. p ◠Cha. 8 Verse 34 VVhosoeuer committeth sinne is the seruant of sinne c. § 2. ◠8 p ◠Verse 39 40 If yee were Abrahams children yee would doe the workes of Abraham § 2. c 6. p 2. Verse 44 You are of your father the diuell and the lusts of your father you will fulfill § 2. c 3. p 2 § 2. c. 8 p 6. Cha. 11 Verse 25 26 I am the resurrection and the life hee that beleeueth in mee c. Sect. 1. c. 7 p 4. Cha. 12 Verse 32 Euen amongst the Rulers many beleeued in him Sect. 1. cha 11. par 1. Cha. 14 Verse 21 Hee that hath Christs commaundements and keepeth them c. Sect. 1. c 8. p 7. Cha. 17 Verse 3 This is life eternall that they may know thee the onely true God c. ibid. ACTS Cha. 7 Verse 5 God gaue Abraham none inheritance c. Sect. 1 c. 7. p. 4. Verse 51 Ye stiffenecked and of vncircumcised hearts c. Sect. 2. c 3. par 2. Cha. 20 Verse 35 It is more blessed to giue then to receiue Sect. 2 c. 4. p 2. Cha. 24 Verse 25 VVhen Paul preached of righteousnes Felix trembled c. Sect. 1. c 6 p. 12. ROMANES Cha. 1 Verse 16 The Gospell of Christ is the power of God vnto saluation to euery one that beleeueth Sect. 1 c. 11. p 9. Cha. 2 Verse 13 The hearers of the law are not righteous before God c. Sect. 2 c. ◠p 3. Verse 28 He is not a Iew which is one outwardly c. Sect. 1. chap 11 par 9. Cha. 3 Verse 3 The faith of God cannot be without effect Sect. 1 c 10. p. 3. Verse 23 There is no difference all haue sinned c. Sect 2. c 6. p 5. Verse 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by faith c. ibidem Cha. 4 Verse 3 Abraham beleeued God and it was counted vnto him for righteousnes ibidem p. 4 Verse 5 6 To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him c. ibidem par 6. Cha. 5 Verse 1 Being iustified by faith we haue peace with God c Sect. 1. c. 1◠par 2. Cha. 6 Verse 2 3 How shall we that are dead to sinne liue yet therein c. Sect. ◠c. 6. p. 2 Cha. 7 Verse 18 To will is present with me but I find no meanes to performe that which is good Sect. 1. c 6. p 5. Cha. 8 Verse 30 Whom he predestinated them also he called and whom hee called them also he iustified Sect. 2 c 6 p 3 Cha. 9 Verse 6 All are not Israell that are called Israell Sect 1 c 11 p 12. Cha. 10 Verse 10 With the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse Sect. 2. chap. 5 par 1. Cha. 13 Verse 10 Owe nothing vnto any man but loue Sect 2 c 4. p 2. 1. CORINTHIANS Cha. 9 Verse 9 God is faithfull by whom wee are called vnto the fellowship of his sonne Christ Iesus c. Sect. 1. c 10. p 3 Cha. 12 Verse 31 Couet ye earnestly the gifts c. Sect. 1 c 11. p. 6. Cha. 13 Verse 1 2 Though I speake with the tongues of men and Angels c. ibid. p 4. 17. 2. CORINTHIANS Cha. 5 Verse 21 Hee hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne c. Sect. 2. c. 7. p. 6. GALATHIANS Cha. 3 Verse 7 Such as doe the workes of Abraham they are the children of Abraham Sect. 1. c 11. p 12. Sect. 2. c. 6. p. 2 EPHESIANS Cha. 5 Verse 18 Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse c.
them and shall his goodnesse in giuing them flake the feruency of our wonted desires or supplications when as we seeke grace onely to the end we may finde and truly taste his mercie Thou hast taught vs Not euery one that sayth Lord Lord shall enter into the kingdome of heauen but such as doe the will of thy Father which is in heauen and his wil as the Apostle witnesseth they only do which obey it in all things omitting no commaundement when occasion is giuen taking no occasion to breake or violate any Shall we then enter into the kingdome of heauen because we thus farre do thy fathers will and in some measure obserue his Commaundements Rather without such obseruance we shall not we cannot enter therein yet when we haue done all this wee are still vnprofitable seruants To what vse then doth our inherent righteousnesse or obseruance of Gods Commaundements serue vs If sincere that haue been and vnfaigned though imperfect yet the faith which brought it forth will make a sincere and faithfull plea for mercy in the day of triall in which he that hath been an hearer only and no doer of the lawe or hath done in part what God would haue done but not sincerely nor faithfully because it was his will and pleasure but out of humour naturall affection or hipocrisie shall cry Lord Lord and shewe many tokens of Gods loue and fauour towards him in hope to better this present sute for mercie yet shall not be heard Why Either because he neuer had any true pledge of Gods fauour or did not vse such as hee had aright because as his workes haue been such now are his prayers presumptuous vnfaithfull or hypocriticall such as cannot obtaine any other answere of God then that depart from mee I neuer knew thee It shall not boote him to make proofe that hee hath giuen his goods to the poore or his body to the fire that he hath healed the sicke cast out diuels and wrought other wonders in CHRISTS name vnsesse his faith haue quelled all trust all pride or glory in these gracings wholly set on Gods mercies in CHRIST from whose apprehension vnlesse these other acts or exercises though of mercie sprung they are not truely done in faith but springing thence we cannot be so ready to doe them as hauing done them to renounce all trust or confidence in them For whiles we compare these slender yet sincere effects of our loue and thankfulnesse to him with his infinite loue and mercie towards vs wheron true faith alwaies lookes whiles it conceiues them the sight of them causeth greater humilitie for the present more hearty sorrow for sinnes past then we could haue conceiued if wee had not done them as the sight of Zorobabels temple finished did make the auntients of Israell weepe because the perfection and glorie of the former was more liuely represented to their senses by this visible and semblable model then by the ruines meere absence or imperfect reparations of it To be able to sound the depth of many conclusions better then others can giues stayed and setled iudgements a more distinct and compleat measure of the knowledge they wanted then fantasticke or shallow wits can haue For this cause solid learning alwaies contracts verball knowledge and superficiall skill in any facultie dilates mens estimates of theÌ„selues puffes them vp with preiudiciall conceits of their owne worth And seeing all our knowledge in this life though of matters naturall and neere at and is euery way imperfect the increase of it is alwaies vnnaturall and monstrous vnlesse the more we know the better we know our imperfectious and be humbled with a more sensible feeling of our wants Now in as much as the fruits of life do neuer take so kindely as the fruites of knowledge in any sonne of Adam since he made that impious and crroneous choice and euery mans owne experience can teach him that his practique faculties or performances come still short of his speculatiue notions or apprehensions of what is good and fit to be done we are by this twofold reason enforced to take the vnfained acknowledgement of our imperfection in working and serious distrust both to our works and our selues as no way iustifiable or approueable in the sight of God but for the perfect and compleate righteousnesse of CHRIST IESVS for an essentiall branch of that vniformity before required in true and sauing faith The growth of these particulars is like the growth of twins the more firme and liuely faith we haue the better and more sincerely we worke the bettter and more sincerely we worke the more vnfaignedly and faithfully wee renounce all confidence in our workes and our selues the more faithfully we renounce all confidence in these the more caâ—tiestly we seeke after saluation only by CHRIST of whose allsufficient sacrifice and righteousuesse fully satisfactory of Gods law and meritorious of mercy our righteousnes inherent though imperfect giues vs a truer tast then vnbelieuers can haue Thus the weaker we are in our selues the stronger we are in Him 4. The former question about the vse of grace depends vpon another betwixt the Romanist and vs about the measure of inherent righteousnesse They make the encrease and growth of grace not to perfect but vtterly to abolish the nature of it by conuerting it into righteousnes inherent as well for quantity as quality acceptable of it selfe to God without his fauour or indulgence We as the name imports make it alwaies subordinate vnto gratious acceptance and seeing we take it onely as a pledge of diuine fauour whereof wee stand perpetually in need as it is first giuen so we desire it may be increased onely to the end we may more constantly and faithfully sue for mercie and seeke diuine approbation aright Of our edification in CHRIST faith is not the foundation onely but the roofe vnto which all other graces haue the same reference that Hur and Aaron had vnto Moses The best seruice euen charitie it selfe can performe is to vnderprop the hands of faith lifted vp vnto the throne of grace from which the sentence of absolution must proceed Directly contradictory to this declaration saith the Romanist faith iustifies onely as it disposeth vs to the attainment of charity which is the formall cause of iustification the complete forme of such perfect righteousnesse inherent as is the onely immediate cause of saluation Charitie though giuen for CHRIST is to him the Crowne of faith reaching heauen by it owne perfection to vs not charity onely but faith it selfe as it is part of our imperfect righteousnesse inherent is footstoole to it selfe in the act of iustification or whiles it pleads for mercy Nor vas any sonne of Adam for the least moment of time euer so righteous but the actuall mediation of Christ or interposition of his sacrifice secluded from his triall at the tribunail of Gods iustice he might besides all his other sinnes iustly haue beene condemned for not stirring vp
should be idle but so he is not saith Bellarmine First because he alwayes ministers strength and grace by which wee doe good works Secondly hee purgeth our daily and lighter sinnes and his blood cleanseth vs from all sinnes Or if through transgression of the law we fall away from our state of righteousnes he neuer thelesse is stil the propitiation for our sins and reconciles vs not only seuen times but seueÌ„ty times seuen times to his father if conuerted by his grace we addresse our selues to serious repentance Therfore we make not CHRIST an idle mediatour in saying the Law may be fulfilled but our aduersaries truly make his benefits vneffectuall when they teach that the excellency of his obedience could not effect that the iustification which is by the Law should bee fulfilled in vs. Whatsoeuer he thought it was safest for him to professe as hee hath written because the Trent Fathers for conclusion of that session accurse all that should say their resolutions in this point did rather disparage then set foorth the excellencie of CHRISTS sacrifice or the true woorth of his merits But the more mercifull Bellarmine makes his God the readier to forgiue our frequent trespasses the greater stil is their former mockery seeing euery time they repeat that petition they implicitely yet necessarily include the appurtenances Lord make vs such as wee shall not need of thy forgiuenesse The excesse of diuine Maiesty in respect of princely dignity presupposed their mockery of God in suing for restauration of grace after relapses into mortall sinne may for the quality be resembled by imagination of some great fauourite in the Court after many bountifull rewards for little or no seruice falling to rob or steale and lastly crauing pardon in these or like tearmes I haue grieuously offended against your Crowne and dignity but by your wonted grace I beseech you bestow as good preferment on me as before I had and amends shall quickly bee made for all the wrongs I haue done vnto my fellow subiects you shall not finde matter of death in me againe so long as your bounty towards me lasts that I shall not commit some petty sinnes of wantonnesse quarrelling drinking swearing I hope your highnesse will not expect for these are not against your Law but besides it The insolency of this imagination in a malefactour could an earthly Prince knowe the heart whence it issued would make his former offence in it self and course of common iustice meritorious of death altogether vncapable of mercy otherwise easie to haue beene obtained And is it either lesse exclusiue from Gods fauour or more prouocatiue of his seuerity to beg such grace at his hands as shall wipe out all former reckonings where with he could charge vs or hauing promised sincere obedience to the Law to elude the Lawgiuer with that distinction without which Bellarmine thinkes our Writers arguments to proue the fulfilling of the Law impossible can hardly be answered They saith he which grant as Vega doth veniall sinnes to be against the Law are enforced to hold that to keepe the Law is onely possible in as much as onely the greater part of it may bee kept whence the denomination is indefinitely attributed to the whole But what can they say to that of Iames. Hee that keepeth the whole Law and offendeth in one point is guilty of all The solide answere therefore in his iudgement is that veniall sinnes without which we doe not liue are not sinnes simply but imperfectly and in a sort neither are they against the Law but besides the Law Such as first did apply this distinction to that purpose for which the moderne Romanist now misuseth it might perhaps be in part excused by the barbarousnesse of the times wherein they liued and their ignorance in Scriptures But wee haue cause to feare that Bellarmines generall skill and knowledge in them vvas punished by GOD vvith particular grosse and palpable ignorance or blindnesse rather in thinking this quiâ—ke of wit should glue together such Oracles of the Apostles as without it would mightily iarre and start asunder As that of Iames late cited He that offends in one mortally is guilty of all and this other In many things we al offend 1. venially or these two of S. Iohn He that is borne of God sinneth not If we say we haue no sin we deceiue our selues So doubtlesse they do and mightily mistake both these great Apostles meaning that thinke any in this should be so righteous as not to stand in neede of Gods fauour for absolution from sins committed against his Law but of their meaning in the Chapter following 9. These discussions may informe the Reader that Bellarmines conclusion of this controuersie wherein hee may seeme vnto the vnobseruant to attribute somewhat to Gods mercies in the businesse of iustification after grace infused was but like the first inuitation of an Italian onely for fashion sake For if his authority could haue moued any of his profession after fulnesse of grace to haue tasted the louing kindnesse of the Lord he could not be ignorant that the Trent Councell had shut the doore vpon them It is the safest way saith he * to put our whole trust in Gods mercies VVhy so because there is no trust or confidence to be put in our owne good workes or fruits of grace No rather because it is more easie to grow proud of our deeds then to be assured of our sincerity in doing them But if neither safe it be to trust in them nor by his doctrine to any purpose without them to trust in Gods mercies hee hath left his Romane Catholikes in a miserable case VVhat is it then they can hope or desire Gods mercies should doe for them To remit their sinnes How By not imputing them this is all they can condemne in vs. VVhat then to set heauen open vnto them without remission of sinnes or iustification This is more then can be laid to any heritickes charge none euer liued but granted iustification to bee a necessary gate through which all that haue sinned must enter into heauen It remaines then the onely ground of all hope or trust a Romanist can haue of any good from Gods mercies must be his precedent perswasion or beliefe of absolute and perfect righteousnesse either now inhabiting his soule or hereafter to be obtayned That is hee must trust God one time or other will be so mercifull to him as he shall not stand in neede of his mercie at the houre of death 10. He that wold clearly conuince the Romish church or her childreÌ„ of a capitall crime vsually obiected by our writers shold begin w th the vertual intentioÌ„ of the priest by rigid positions of their late writers most necessarily required to the effectual working of the Sacraments for that euidently breedeth doubt whervnto if we adioyne this absolute necessity of compleat habitual grace inherent for remission of sins it openly condemnes the Trent Councell it selfe for nursing
not haue done though our Sauiour in person should haue charged him so to doe Easier it is by this assiduous carefulnesse and religious practice to weede all rootes of loue or trust in riches by little and little out of the heart then to bee plucked from them vpon a suddaine albeit vtterly to extirpate all trust in them where they abound is onely possible to the omnipotent power and a rare document of diuine mercie as that dialogue betwixt our Sauiour and his Disciples begunne vpon the former young mans sorrowfull departure at the mention of such qualification as he exacted of his followers doth necessarily implie IESVS saith the Euangelist looked round about and said vnto his Disciples How hardly doe they that haue riches enter into the Kingdome of God His manner of vttring it or other circumstances not expressed did intimate greater difficulty to his Disciples at the first hearing then this short speech doth vnto vs. For they were astoâ—ied at his words Did they then mistake him or was he willing to make the difficulty lesâ—e then they conceiued it No he answered againe children how hard it is for them that trust in riches to enter into the Kingdome of heauen It is easier for a camell to goe through the eye of a needle then for whom he that trusts in riches No for a rich man to enter into the kingdome of God Well might this reassumption of the former difficultie increase their astonishment and extort that demaund who then what rich man at least can be saued with men it is impossible any should but not with God Howbeit to make entrance into the kingdome of God for him that trusts in riches while he trusts in them is no act of his omnipotent power seeing no man can trust in him and in riches too for this were to serue him and Mammon nor is it possible by the diuine decree that any should enter into that kingdome without trust in God The matter therefore which seemed altogether vnpossible to the conceipt of CHRISTS disciples was for a rich man not to trust in riches as much as this young man did this is an extraordinary gift of God to be sought with greater care with greater diligence and frequency of praiers of fastings and practices of charity then either wealth preferment health life or whatsoeuer may befall it Blessed is the rich which is found without blemish and hath not gone after gold nor hoped in money and treasure Who is he and we will commend him for wonderfull things hath he done among his people Who hath beene tried thereby and found perfect let him be an example of glory who might offend and hath not offended or doe euill and hath not done it Therefore shall his goods be established and the congregation shall declare his almes 4. But as in most other points so in this we vsually fill vp the measure of our iniquitie vnto the brimme ere wee thinke Gods iudgements can approach vs by a generall ouersight elsewhere discouered in vsing the seculiar phrase of our corrupt times rather then the gage of the sanctuary for notifying the capacity of that body of sinne which we beare about vs or the greatnesse of our actuall transgressions Who will not confesse that it is very hard to haue riches and not to trust in them and impossible for him that trusts in them to enter into the kingdome of God But who is he will thus assume It is very likely that I trust in riches what is it blindes vs but the grosse language whereto we are accustomed as if to trust in them were to say vnto them ye shall deliuer mee to pray or offer sacrifice vnto them yet so our hearts say though we perceiue it not vnlesse we be more carefull and vigilant to make vs friends of the vnrighteous Mammon then either to get or keepe treasures though lawfull vnlesse more delighted in employing them to charitable vses then in watching or entertaining oportunities for increasing them In them we trust not in our God vnlesse the inclinations of our hearts to get or forgoe them be so iustly poised that any occasion of doing good doe cast our resolution as readily one way as the other that their losse if by Gods appointment they take wing doe not so depresse our soules but that they may instantly returne as Iobs did vnto their wonted station The Lord hath giuen and the Lord hath taken away blessed be the name of the Lord. So prepared we should bee that our ioy should flow as well when our earthly store doth ebbe as when it swelleth Let the brother of low degree saith Saint Iames reioice in that he is exalted but the rich in that he is made low for as the flower of the grasse he passeth away Thus whiles wealth increases it should occasion vs to trust in God because he giues it but more whiles it failes because it is then more manifest there is no trust to be reposed in it CHAP. VII Of the antipathy betweene true Faith and ambition or selfe-exaltation That the one resembles our Sauiours the other Sathans disposition Briefe admonitions for auoiding such dangers as grow from other branches of voluptuous life 1. SEeing desire of riches drawes vs into so many snates and intangles vs with so many noisome lusts the reader happily will condemne the couetous as the man whom God abhorreth most Howbeit besides couetousnesse or loue of riches another root of euill there is whose antipathy with the seed of life is like the enmity betwixt the womans and the serpents seedâ— And no maruell seeing true and liuely faith is the expresse image of that humble meek lowly mind which was in Christ as this wilde tare whose extirpation we seeke is but the ofspring of the great serpents venemous pride Riches choke or stiâ—le the word of life in the growth and make the passage into the kingdome of God so hard and narrow for the rich man as is declared but aspiring thoughts perish the very first seedes and rootes of faith and cast downe the ambitious man headlong from approaching the gate whereat the righteous enter for a euery one that exalts himselfe shall bee brought low Could we rightly measure the nature of ambition or exaltation of mans selfe by the true rule of the sanctuary and not by the popular notions or conceipts that men this way very faulty haue of this infernall sinne we might finde a more compendious ascent vnto the holie mount then most doe take or care to enquire after The roote whence this mischiefe springs as all agree is a desire of ciuill power or greatenes which then onely in vulgar esteeme brancheth it selfe into ambition when this greatnes is sought for by vnlawfull meanes but this is a mist of error or hypocrisie in the minde which riseth from foggy desires of this grosse humour in the heart For we may as often we doe vse lawfull meanes for compassing most vnlawfull ends
present danger or disagrace as not odious in the worlds sight And many scattered delights meeting in one like a multitude of broad shallow streames falling into one deepe narrow channell carry the soule with least interruption of speedy passage into the bottomlesse gulfe Vnited force is alwaies strongest and for this reason it is oft harder to renounce one sinne wherein wee delight much then a great manie we equally affect Freedome from manie vsually breeds secret presumption or indulgence to our delight in some one or few and indulgence bringeth forth hardnesse of heart Of if the worldly wise-man can curbe all his desires from bursting out into knowne euils this aboundantly contents him but so doth it not his God vnto whom this permanent luke-warme ciuill temper symbolizing onely with true religion in abstinence from actuall euill not in feruency of deuotion is more abhominable then the distemperature of publicanes and open sinners accompanied vsually with most vices yet not so firmely wedded vnto any but discouerie of their filthinesse may induce them to be diuorced from all It is much worse to be at the verie entrie into the kings banquet and retire or not goe in than to stay at home and pretend excuses A chaste infidell sayth S. Augustine is not onely lesse prayse-worthy than an incontinent belieuer in that hee is continent without beliefe but rather lyable to greater reproofe in that being continent hee doth not belieue 7. Of such vniformity in practising dueties expresly taught by the rule of faith as hitherto hath beene prosecuted is that most true which the moderne Romanist in no point destitute of one ape tricke or other to mocke God and man with a counterfait shape of true religion misapplies to curious points of speculation bearing men in hand that if they belieue not euerie point of faith alike they belieue none aright Whence many things they teach as necessarie to saluation being intricate and impossible to be conceiued with such euidence or probabilitie as may ground certaintie of faith seely soules are brought to distrust the perspicuitie of scriptures and to repose that confidence in their instructers which they should doe in Gods word and so for feare least they should haue no faith but by belieuing as the Church doth they belieue the Church only not God nor any article of faith as was deliuered in the former booke Nor can their workes if conceiued or begotten by the booke or Iesuiticall rules of life be euer acceptable in Gods sight because not inspired by true and liuely faith vniformely spreading it selfe throughout all their faculties cherishing and strengthening them as the Sunne doth plants to bring forth fruite To speculatiue points or our Assent vnto diuine reuelations as true the former rule is onely then appliable when wilfull contempt or indulgence to our owne affections doth blinde our vnderstanding He that vpon such motiues doubts of any principall article or disâ—ents from it rightly belieueth none but if for want either of naturall capacity or particular illumination of Gods spirit hee cannot so firmely Assent vnto some principall truth as others doe to whome they are more fully reuealed so hee demeane himselfe during the time of his dissent or doubt according to that measure of knowledge God hath giuen him his faith may be sincere and sound though not so farre spread as it is in other men 8. But some better minded perhaps will here demaund how farre this vniformity in practise is to be extended as whether a man may not be more prone to one sinne then another or more apt to conforme his will and desires vnto Gods wil in some points of his seruice then in others without preiudice to the sincerity or liueli-hood of his faith If this pronenesse to euill and negligence in good proceed from strength of naturall inclination or long custome his relapse into the one or holding off from the other doth not disproue his obedience in those points wherin faith hath gotten full conquest ouer his desires if his inclinations to his beloued or bewitching sins proportionably decrease or wane as his zeale or deuotion in the points of duty are augmented But euery member of the old man must be mortified ere our faith be euery way such as that whereby the Iust doe liue The manner of whose life by Faith is now necessarily to be discussed more fully then in these present meditations was intended least from some passages in the former discourses the vnobseruant Reader happily suspect the difference betwixt vs and the Romish Church in this controuersie to be but small or to consist rather in words than in substance especially if works be so necessarily included as wee suppose in that faith which iustifies Nor seems it easie to reiect our aduersaries form of doctrine without some preiudice to Saint Iames in whose tearmes their assertions for the most part are conceiued This last preiudice notvvithstanding first remooued wee are to manifest their dissent from vs and from the forme of wholsome doctrine which Gods Word prescribes to bee as great in this question as in anie For admitting their Faith vvere sound and their workes which is before refuted liuely they vtterly inuert the right vse of both and by artificiall sleights or tricks of wit not discouerable by euery eye drawe poore soules from CHRIST the onely end of the Lawe as well morall as ceremonial the sole load starre of Faith and all other sanctifying graces CHAP. VI. Of difficulties arising from the former discourses in the Protestants doctrine of Iustification by faith without workes That faith is as immediately apt to do good vvorkes of euery kinde as to iustifie Of the diuers acceptions of iustification That the iustification by workes mentioned by Saint Iames is presupposed as subordinate to Saint Paules iustification by faith without workes The true reconcilement of these two Apostles contrarie speeches in appearance from the contrarietie of their seuer all ends or intentions 1. SAint Paul as is declared at large before includes workes in faith which Saint Iames takes as hee found it in vnfruitfull hearers destitute of good workes This difference notwithstanding alone considered doth no way salue but rather remooue the seeming contradiction between the one auouching and the other disclaiming iustification by faith without workes and cause it wholy to settle in Saint Pauls assertion or in the doctrine of Protestants thence deriued For whether iustified we be by workes and faith as Saint Iames expresly speakes or by a working saith as Saint Paul implies this faith workes such righteousnes as Saint Iames requires not in others but in our selues Seeing then both faith and the righteousnesse it workes are inherent in vs how are we not iustified by inherent righteousnes if iustified by such a working faith as Saint Pauls commaunds and we haue hitherto described This which we conceiue by way of doubt our Sauiours doctrine seemes to put out of all controuersie Except your righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of