Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heaven_n	earth_n	power_n	principality_n	1,975	5	10.5828	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93702	Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht: containing a confutation of the three degrees of popery, viz. papacy, prelacy, and presbitery; answerable to the triple crowne of the three-headed Cerberus the Pope, with his three fold hierarchies aforesaid. With a dispelling of all other dispersed clouds of errour, which doth interpose the clear sun-shine of the Gospel in our horrizon. Wherein the chiefe arguments each of them have, for the vindication of their erronious tenents are incerted, and refuted; with a description of such whem [sic] the true Church of Christ doth consist of: as also how, and by whom, they may be gathered, and governed, according to the will, and appointment of Jesus Christ, and his apostles, in the primative purity thereof. / By Iohn Spittlehouse, assistant to the Marshall Generall of the Army, under the command of his Excellency, the Lord Generall Fairfax. Imprimated by Theod. Jennings, and entred in the Stationers Hall.	Spittlehouse, John.	1649 (1649)	Wing S5013; Thomason E586_2; ESTC R203633	304,213	396

c. I am whatsoever was is or is to come It is also reported of a Heathen that being asked what God was said Quod semper est neque principium habens neque finem That which alwayes is having neither beginning nor ending It is also reported that upon the Temple of Apollo were written Tues intimating that such things as are mutable and changeable may rather be said not to be then be There is also the name Jehovah given unto God which signifieth the same with Eheje being added as more usuall and better knowne and it betokeneth two things principally viz. The Eternity Of his name Jehovah and alwayes being of God and his cause of being to all other things as the efficient cause from whom the formall cause through whom and the finall cause for whom all things are 2. It betokeneth Gods power in his goodnesse and truth the first in being able the second in being gracious and willing and third in being constant to fulfill his promise Fourthly this name Jehovah is also incommunicable to all other El●him which signifieth God is sometimes given to Angels sometimes to Judges c. but Jehovah is peculiar unto God so that of all names that are given unto God none doth more fully expresse what God is then the name Jehovah CHAP. II. Treateth of the opinion of the Anti-trenitarians and the confutation thereof THe opinion of the Anti-trenitarians is either to deny the Divinity of Christ or that he is not equall with the Father and the Holy Ghost That there is a God I have proved and it cannot be denyed by any who beleeve the Scriptures or are Rationall Now that Christ is God is also sufficiently confirmed That Christ is God by the Apostle Paul Col. 2. 9. In him dwelleth the fulnesse of the God-head bodily As also the testimony of John Chap. 1. 1 2 3. In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God the same was in the beginning with God all things were made by him and without him was nothing made that was made In him was life and that life was the light of men c. with Col. 1. 16 17. For by him were all things created that are in heaven and earth visible or invisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principallities or powers all things were created by him and for him and he is before all things and by him all things consist as also Ioh. 5. 10. Phil. 2. 6. SECT 2. That the Holy Ghost is God THat the Holy Ghost is God is also proved by divers places of Scriptures as in Gen. 1. 2. where it is said that the Spirit of God moved upon the waters by which the creatures were fostered and formed as Job 26. 13. His Spirit hath garnished the heavens 2. Againe as God only created the world so likewise the renovation of the heart is only the work of God because it is a new creation as the Prophet termeth it Psal 51. 10. where he saith Create in me a new heart but this is also the work of the Spirit as it followes take not thy holy Spirit from me and againe in the 12. vers Hold me up with thy free Spirit intimating that without the aide and assistance of the blessed Spirit no divine work viz. as the creating of a new heart can be wrought or effected 3. It is Gods work to teach us his will and to bring us to eternall life but this is wrought by the Spirit as the Psalmist confesseth Psal 143. 10. in these words Teach me to doe thy will for thou art my God let thy good Spirit lead me into the land of righteousnesse in which place the Prophet confesseth that he could not doe the will of God without the assistance of the Spirit of God 4. The Holy Ghost is excellently proved to be God from that passage concerning Sampson where it is said The Spirit of the Lord came upon him Judg. 14. 5. but after his locks were polled it is also said that he knew not that the Lord was departed from him Judg. 16. 20. from whence we may gather that he that came upon him before was the same that departed from him then there called the Spirit of the Lord and so it is evident that the same that is called the Spirit of the Lord is also called the Lord. 5. It is also proved from Act. 5. where Peter reproving Annanias for his dissemulation saith Why hath Satan filled thy heart to lye to the Holy Ghost and to keep back part of the price of the Land c. Why hast thou conceived this thing in thy heart thou hast not lyed unto men but unto God Where comparing the fourth verse with the third it is evident that the lye which Annanias made to the Holy Ghost was made unto God as also Mat. 12. 31 32. 6. Our Saviour also testifieth as much Joh. 14. 15 16 17. I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter How the Holy Ghost dwelt with the Apostles and not in them even the Spirit of truth I will not leave you comfortlesse I will come unto you by which words it is evident that the Comforter he spake of was himselfe for saith he he dwelleth with you and shall be in you As if he had said as I have formerly declared my selfe the first Person in creating of you and now the second Person in redeeming of you so when I am ascended into Heaven I will then shew my selfe the third Person in sanctifying of you I will not leave you comfortlesse I will come unto you He did then acknowledge himselfe to be the Comforter which he would send them SECT 3. Of the Vnity of the Trinity HAving thus procured the Trinity of Persons in the next place I will treat of the Vnity of them which is sufficiently proved by one Text of Scripture 1 Joh. 5. 7. There be three that beare record in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one It is also confirmed by our Saviours answer to Philip Joh. 14. 8. 10 11. where desiring to see the Father is answered by Christ in these words Have I been so long with you and yet hast thou not knowne me Philip he that Christ equall with the Father hath seene me hath seene the Father how sayest thou then shew me the Father beleeve me that I am in the Father and the Father in me the words that I speake I speake not of my selfe but the Father that dwelleth in me he doth the workes beleeve me that I am in the Father and the Father in me Joh. 17. 21. I and The Holy Ghost one with the Father my Father am one Joh. 10. 30. And that the Holy Ghost is one with the Father and the Son we have also the testimony of our Saviour John 16. 1● where he promising the Holy Ghost to his Disciples saith He shall glorifie me for he shall

For if so in that sence God and Nature are both one and God and Nature compared therefore is called Natura naturans that Nature which giveth nature to all things so that one defining of Nature calleth it God and divine reason incerted and put into the world and every part thereof but if by the word Nature they meane a certaine power influence or instinct which without sence or understanding in it selfe hath an opperation in things senslesse inclining and moving them to a certaine end It must needs follow that the same nature influence or power hath that motion force or opperation from some superiour essence which hath understanding and is of infinite power and wisedome who createth moveth guideth and concerneth it In which sence it is defined of some to be principium motus quies the beginning of motion and rest and so numbred amongst such causes as work for an end From all which it may be concluded that nature must needs Nature Gods instrument be directed by the providence of God for nothing that is voyd of understanding and sence can tend to a certaine end except it be directed by some that knoweth the end As an Arrow cannot tend to a certaine marke except it be shot by some that knoweth the marke in which sence nature can be nothing else but the instrument Nature Gods order of God Againe nature may be termed Gods order and so things extraordinary are called unnaturall For●une his unrevealed will and so we call things changeable that are besides reason and expectation What then is Nature but God! call him what thou wilt Nature Jupiter c. he hath as many names as officer it comes all to one passe That God it the fountaine of all the first giver and preserver from whom and of whom all things The universal world is nothing but God ●●prest depend and that he is all 〈◊〉 all and in every place so that the universall world is nothing else but God exprest and therefore every man that hath reason or is reasonable may know out of the same reason that he that made him is God as the Psalmist confesseth Psal 100. It is he that made us and not me ourselves for as a man seeing a great fabrick or building will conclude that it did not make it selfe so we seeing the great fabrick of Heaven and Earth must needs conclude that it had one that framed and produced it in that beauty we see it have As the Psalmist also acknowledgeth Psal 19. 1. 2. The heavens declare the glory of God and the firm●ment sheweth his handy worke One day telleth another and one night certifieth another c. SECT 2. Of the Appellations of God whereby he is made knowne unto the world THe name of a thing is that whereby it is made knowne unto others and severed and distinguished from other things In this latter respect God needeth no name because he is but one Of the Appellations of God neither can properly any name be given him because he is infinite and cannot be comprehended in a name Neither is a name given to God in respect of himselfe but to us that in some sort he might be made knowne unto us That there is a God Nature it selfe will teach us but what this God is we know not but as it pleaseth him to reveale unto us in his Word Now the name of God in Scripture is five wayes to be taken As 1. For God himselfe Joel 2. 32. Whosoever shall call upon the The names of God five waies taken name of God shall be saved 2. For the Word of God as in Joh. 17. 6. where our blessed Saviour saith I have manifested thy name c. 3. For the wisedome power mercy and other Attributes of God as in Mal. 1. 11. Great is my name that is my glory power and majesty 4. For the commandement of God Joh. 17. 8. I came in my Father● name 5. For that whereby God is called viz. Jebovah Exed 3. 15. where the Lord saith This is my name for ever Further touching the names which are given to God they The names of God of soure so●ts may be reduced to foure sorts viz. 1. The names whereby the divine Nature and Essence is expressed a● Eheje Jehovah which are only peculiar unto God 2. His name taken from his Attributes as his Wisedome Justice Mercy and such like which properties though in a most excellent manner they agree unto God yet are also communicated unto Creatures and so he is called Creator Lord Governour Preserver his opperations being three-fold as 1. In Creation 2. In Formation and 3. In Consummation 3. Some of his names include a Negation or absence of some imperfection incident to the Creatures and so he is called immortall immutable as also in regard of the vaine opinions and estimations of men as the Idols of the Gentiles were called gods 4. The name of God is given him by way of Similitude as Magistrates in respect of their Authority are called gods so also Prophets in regard of their divine knowledge Holy men for their sanctity and Angels for the excellency of their Creation and so are called gods Nun cupative by a kinde of Appellation as Moses is called Aarons God Exod. 4. 16. but the Lord is called God essentially The God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob Exod. 3. 4. Besides these there are other names which belong particularly unto God as in Exod. 3. 4. where the Lord saith to Moses Eheje or I am that I am hath sent thee Which word according to the Expositers of the Hebrewes signifieth The peculier name of God all the differences of time both past present and to come as it is expounded Rom. 1. 8. 2. Others terme it a name of Of his name these unchangeablenesse for the creatures which have their dependencie of themselves cannot say Ero I shall be 3. It sheweth the perfection of God that hath his being of himselfe and not of any other 4. The goodnesse of God that giveth to all things their being as i● Rom. 11. 36. where the Apostle saith Of him through him and for him are all things therefore in that things are said to be they have it given them by the goodnesse of God 5. It declareth the infinitenesse of God that God is all in all as in 1 Cor. 15. 28. so that this is unto God to be to be all things as wisedome goodnesse righteousnesse c. 6. This name maketh a difference betwixt the true God and the false gods of the Heathen that had no being at all 7. This name sheweth both the power of God that nothing can hinder his everlasting being and his goodnesse in promising his continuall presence and assistance to his Church and this name of God was not unheard of amongst the wiser sort of the Heathen for it is said that this sentence was written upon the doores of the Egyptians Temples Ego sum omne

invocation of Saints that are departed for God sendeth not Abimeleck to Noah or any other departed to pray for him but to Abraham then living which duty may be mutually performed in charity whilst one knoweth anothers necessities but for the living to pray to or for the dead which knoweth not their wants being already certainly disposed of in an unchangeable estate as the living are not as also in that the Prophet telleth us that Abraham is dead and Isaac is ignorant of us Isa 63. 16. is such a conceit as hath no warrant from Scripture or any sound reason because they are not present to heare our prayers neither doe they know our hearts and we have one sufficient Advocate and Mediator Jesus Christ 1 Ioh. 3. 1. and therefore need we not the mediation of any other neither will they assume unto themselves any part of We ought to confesse our fins only to God 1 King 8. 47. Psal 19. 120. 33. 5 41. 44. Jer. 14. 20. D●n 9. 15. Mat. 15. 18. 1 Ioh. 1. 9. Christs Office for as the perfume Exod. 30. 8. was alwayes before the Lord which doth signifie the prayers of the Saints so God only through Christ must be invocated which honour he will not give to any other for God must only be beleeved upon as our Saviour saith Ye beleeve in God beleeve also in me Joh. 14. 1. and the Apostle saith that men cannot call upon him on whom they have not beleeved Rom. 10. 14. and certainly they would not have us beleeve in Saints departed Obj. Abs●lon could not be admitted to his fathers presence untill Joab had mediated for him and Bethshaba Solomons mother intreated for Adoniah so it is necessary to have Mediators unto God Ans 1. We have one sufficient Mediator Jesus Christ who is able sufficiently to reconcile us unto God 2. Though many mediators are used in Princes Courts because either they are ignorant of our affaires or their affections is estranged yet it is not so with God who knoweth all things besides the love of Christ to us exceedeth the love of all other inferiour Mediators which men can seeke unto 3. The example of Bethshaba is unfitly alledged for she obtained not her suite SECT 6. Obj. ELiphas saith to Job Job 5. 1. Call now if any will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne thee 2. David exhorteth to praise the Lord in his Saints Psal 150. 1. 3. It is said in Ezekiel I sought for a man amongst them to make up the hedge c. but I found none Ans Eliphas in that place speaketh of the Saints and righteous living to see if Job could finde amongst any of them a patron to defend his cause 2. The place in the Psalmes is Praise God in his holinesse or in his sanctuary neither doth it follow that because God is praised in his Saints that therefore we are to pray to Saints as it followeth in the next words praise him in the firmament will they therefore have the firmament prayed unto 3. The place in Ezekiel is spoken of men living and not The Saint● to whom the Papists pray shall be their accusers of men dead the answer therefore which Jacob gave to Rachiel when she called to him for children saying Give me children c. Am I in Gods stead may fitly be applyed by the Saints departed to such prayers or desires made unto them And as our Saviour said to the Jewes There is one that accuseth you even Moses in whom ye trust so the Saints which these men so superstitiously worship will at the last day be their accusers CHAP. VI. Treateth of their Idolizing of the Pope c. with a confutation thereof HAving discussed their folly in worshipping of Idols and Images without life as also their adoration and invocation of Angels and Saints departed I shall now discover their folly in worshipping a living Idol viz. the Pope to whom they ascribe an infallibility as also the title of their Lord God the Pope SECT 2. Object IS not the Pope Peters successor and is not Christ said to speake these words to Peter viz. Thou art Peter and upon this rock will I build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevaile against it and I will give thee the keyes of the kingdome of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt binde on earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven By all which expressions doubtlesse he gave unto Peter a speciall priviledge above all the other Apostles Ans That the Pope is Peters successor I grant but yet in Wherein the Pope is Peters Successor this one particular which was in denying his Lord and Master whose servant he pretends to be and as to the urging of them words mentioned to the particular person of Peter as that thereby he had a more speciall priviledge then the rest of the Apostles is to goe about to prove that our Saviour did contradict himself in his expressions used to the two ambitious Suitors James and John whom no other place would serve them then to sit on the Mat. ●0 20. right and left hand in his kingdome in these words It shall not be so amongst you in which words there is an absolute nullaty of any superiority amongst the Apostles or Disciples of Christ and that by a Statute not to be repealed being the determinate law of a just authority by a Cannon ordained and irrevocably fixed by the wisdome of God and confirmed by an example beyond all arguments even by an example fetched from his owne particular vers 28. where he saith that the Sonne of man came not to be ministred unto but to minister as also Luk. 22. 27. I am amongst you as he that serveth now seeing this humility was in Christ himself how much more ought it to have been amongst Iob. 15. 10. his Apostles and Disciples The servant must not be greater then his Lord Joh. 13. 16. neither he that is sent greater then he that sent him it is enough that the servant be as his Master Mat. 10. 25. 2. To stop these blasphemous and Antichristian mouthes I An equ●ll power and commission were g●ven to all the Apostle● shall also prove that an equall power and commission in use of the keyes was likewise given to all the rest of the Apostles and Disciples of Christ as well as unto Peter and that by the words of our Saviour both before his Passion and also after his Resurrection before his Passion in these words Verily I say unto you whatsoever ye shall binde on earth c. and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Mat. 18. 18. as also after his resurrection as we have it Joh. 20. 23. Whosoever sins ye remit they are remitted and whosoever sins ye retaine they are retained in both which places of Scripture the words are directed to all the Disciples as also

thereof although he knoweth that it tendeth to his owne ruine and perdition SECT 3. NOw seeing they thus faile in their foundation what can be The Papists foundations infirme expected concerning their building seeing they faile in their Principles what may be expected in their Consequences seeing they faile in proving the Supremacy of Peter over the other Apostles how farre will their lord god come short to justifie the wearing of a triple Crown of Gold and the rest of his Pontificall Vestments being farre more fit for a Stage-player then a Minister of the Gospel I wonder what Scripture he hath for the wearing of such like toyes unlesse as I said he derive them from Aarons garments which the most ignorant know that they were but Types of Christ and are also abolished by Christ as that Anti-christ of Rome very well knoweth but where doth he read of a triple Crown which Peter wore he may be ashamed to abuse the world with such fopperies as that it was left by the Apostle Peter and that it is yet to be seen in Peters Church and that Silvester shewed it to Constantine which he said Peter used by the instinct of the Spirit that the verity might be answerable to the figure viz. that Christs High-Priests might weare that which the High Priest the Figure of Christ did weare SECT 8. NOw who that is in his wits will beleeve that Peter did weare a triple Crown of Gold who had not sometimes a penny in his purse Act. 3. 6. as also in that his Lord and Master The glory and Crown of the Apostles was crowned with Thornes I blush therefore to see men so stupid as to beleeve that the Apostles used such worldly pomp whose glory was their poverty and the contempt of the world their Crown and suffering and if there had been any such Crown it had rather belonged to Paul then Peter for he was the Apostle of the Gentiles the other of the Circumcision Againe if that be Peters triple Crown which is to be seen in Saint Peters Church why doth his Holinesse refuse to weare it but rather make use of a Massie triple Crown of Gold and precious Stone and as for Aarons Crown it was a Type of Christ and not of the Pope and temporall things doth not prefigure temporall one triple Crown another but that outward Crown did shadow forth that Spirituall Kingdome and regall dignity of Christ SECT 9. LEt all the world therefore take notice what subtill and devillish The Popes subtilty inventions this Instrument of Satan useth that he may still delude the world and continue in his worldly pomp and glory and the better to bring the world to his bend he termeth himself a Servant of Servants which his Claw-backs say he assumeth as a signe of great humility which he cunningly ●●sinuateth from the words of our Saviour Mat. 20. 26. He that will be great amongst you let him be your Servant and thus doth he wrest the Scriptures to his owne end but it will speedily appeare that like another C●iphas he proficieth of the destruction of his owne kingdome and that he will very suddenly become a servant of servants indeed as Canaan was yea and become a servant to them that served him Againe his insolency is intollerable in that he thinketh scorne to be reproved yea though he should send ten thousand soules to Hell yet none must say why doest thou so SECT 6. Object WHat need is there of reproving him seeing he cannot erre Answ The Pope is farre inferiour to Aaron who erred by The Pope ●●rre inferiour to Aaron or Peter who erred making the golden Calf and though he was appointed of God and elder brother to Moses yet did Moses openly reprove him at the least I hope he will not challenge to be superiour to Peter who erred in denying his Master Mark 14. 68. 70. 71. as also by dissimulation whereof he was openly reproved by Paul Gal. 2. 11 c. His unparalleld presumption appeareth also in taking upon him to forgive sinnes yea to have God at his command for in case a man sinne and crave pardon of God and he forgive him it is to no purpose unlesse his holinesse doe the like for the Lord hath ingaged himself to the Pope that whatsoever he doth remit on earth shall be remitted in heaven but the Popes Holinesse hath not done the like to God by which means he forceth the ignorant people to a composition as did his Brother Judas by a quid dabitis What will you give me so that he hath not only man at his command but he hath also got God upon the hip as we use to say forgetting the saying of his cousen Germen the Scribes end Pharisees Mark 2. 7. which may very justly be attributed unto him viz. Why doth this man thus blaspheme who can forgive sins but God only SECT 11. Object VVHat difference is there betwixt absolving and remitting of sins Ans Absolution implyeth a forgivenesse of sins by Authority The difference betwixt Absolution and Remission of sin● remission only by way of Declaration wherefore the latter may be permitted to men but the former only to God for if man could forgive we need not aske pardon from God but how should a Man forgive anothers sins who cannot forgive his own true they may absolve by preaching sins in generall but not apply their absolution to particular men because they know not whether their repentance be sound or hollow for God only knoweth the heart of man and therefore is only able to forgive the sins of men Mark 2. 7. CHAP. VII The seventh Chapter treateth of Transubstantiation with a confutation thereof SECT 1. THe next thing which I will insist upon is their detestable Heresie of Transubstantiation by which they say the Sacrament of bread is converted into the reall Body and blo●d of Jesus Christ in which he was conversans here on earth and in which he was crucified yea that they eate his very Flesh and gnash his very Bones in their teeth like so many Caniballs or Man-●aters and that after the words of Consecration there remaineth not so much as the substance of bread but only the meere accidents and qualities of it yea that it is substantially and really the Body and blood together with the Soule and Divinity of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and that under each kinde and under every part of each kinde whole Christ is comprised and that it is not so whilst it is taken but before and afterward in the consecrated peices reserved and remaining after the Communion and that all Communicants both bad and good doe eate the very naturall Body of Christ Obj. Doth not our Saviour say in plain termes that if we eate not the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood we have no life in us and that whosoever eateth his flesh and drinketh his blood hath eternall life and he will raise them up at the

THe Sacrament then of the Body and blood of Christ is given The Body and blood of Christ only eaten and drunk by faith taken and eaten only after a spirituall manner by the mouth of faith and it is a token of love which Christians ought to have amongst themselves and for which it is called the Lords Table 1 Cor. 10. 11. the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 10. a communion of the body of Christ and they that partake thereof though they be many yet are but one bread and one body 1 Cor. 10. 16 17. Now the same faith shall save us which saved the Fathers before Christs Incarnation who did eate his body and drink his blood spiritually through faith and therefore as the Manna which came down from Heaven and the water which issued out of the Rock was the same to the Israelites as the bread and wine in the Sacrament is to us and in regard as many as did apprehend Christ in the Manna and water of the Rock are said to eate the same spirituall meat and to drink the same spirituall drink which we doe and albeit the figures are changed and altered yet faith abideth one and the same And thus the Fathers did eate Christ before the Manna and after the Manna was ceased Having shewed the manner of eating Christ in the Manna and seeing the like may be spoken of the Pascall Lambe which was not to be eaten raw Exod. 12. 9. that is carnally substantially and visibly with what face can these blockish people think to eate with their mouth and teeth the very body and bones of Christ And who may better be said to eate Christ raw then they which come not with a true and a lively faith but with such an erronious perswasion therefore as raw flesh is offensive to the stomack and such an one as eateth it may to said to eate his owne death so they that eate and drink in the Sacrament unworthily are said by the Apostle to eate and drink their owne damnation 1 Cor. 5. 7. SECT 10. By whom the Sacrament is truly eaten 3. AS none were admitted to eate of the Lambe of Consecration Exod. 29. 33. but such as were of Abrahams Family so none but those that are of Christs Family indeed and doe beleeve in him can be partakers of his body and blood for whosoever saith Christ eateth of my body and drinketh of my blood hath eternall life Joh. 6. 54. so then those men are grosly mistaken and deceived that think that the wicked and unbeleevers doe eate the very flesh and drink the very blood of Christ in the Sacrament for then it would follow upon our blessed Saviours words that they shall have eternall life Further as the Pascall Lambe was not to be eaten by uncircumcised persons or such as were strangers from the faith of Israel Exod. 12. 33. so neither are those Mysteries or Sacraments of Religion to be given to Infidels or profaine persons for our Saviour would not have us give holy things to doggs or cast pearls amongst swine Mat. 7. 2. This shall seeme to be spoken in confutation of the Papists detestable and damnable opinion of Transubstantiation as also that the Sacrament of the Altar giveth life Ex eperè operato by the thing done and being present at though there be never a good thought thereunto by him that is present and a receiver thereof as also that the true and naturall body of Jesus Christ is in with and under the Bread and Wine and may be eaten chewed and digested even of Turkes and Infidels as also that the same true and reall body of Jesus Christ may be devoured of Doggs Hoggs Cats Rats and so consequently these creatures receive and injoy by vertue of the same eternall life which is blasphemy in the highest degree SECT 11. Whether the corporall presence of Christ can be in more places then one at one time Obj. THe Papists verifie it may their reason is because Christs Man-hood say they is so annexed to his God-head as fire in Iron which cannot be separated and therefore must be in all places with the God-head Ans That assertion is false as may evidently appeare by The body of Christ not in two places at one time these Scriptures as Luk. 24. 6. when the woman sought Christ at the Sepulchre where the Angels told them that he was not there for he was risen but if his body had been in every place the Angel had lyed As also at the raising of Lazarus Christ saith to his Disciples I am glad for your sakes that I was not there Joh. 11. 15. and so Christ should not have spoken truly if that he had been there as he was Man Moreover Christ saith The poore you shall alwayes have with you but me you shall not have alwayes Joh 12. 8. Again it followeth not that every thing that is in God should be in every place as God is for the Scripture saith That in him we live move and have our being Act. 17. 28. and yet we are not in every place as he is God for so he is in all places but as he is man he sitteth at his Fathers right hand and if we should grant Christ to be in all places as he is Man we should take away the truth of his body for though his Man-hood be in God and God in his Man-hood yet is followeth not that it should be in all places as his Diety is for as touching his Manhood he was on earth not in heaven when he said No man ascendeth into heaven but he that descended from heaven Joh. 3. 13. And further to confirme this point Christ saith to his Disciples I ascend to my Father and yours my God and yours Joh. 20. 17. Again the being of one body in divers places or in two places at once is against nature and Scripture cannot allow of it One writing to his friend to resolve him touching that passage of Christ to the Thiefe on the Crosse where he saith This day shalt thou be with me in paradise Luk. 23. 43. whether our Saviour meant he should be with his Soule or his Body or his God-head in paradise to which question his friend returned this answer Touching Christs corporall Body that day it was in the Sepulchre and that was not in paradise although in a garden and as touching his Soule it was that day in Hel and none will say that paradise was there therefore that text saith he must needs he understood to be spoken of his God-head and therefore Christs Man-hood was neither that day in heaven or on earth but in the Sepulchre SECT 12. Of Christs preaching to the Spirits in prison Object IN that reply is confirmed that the wicked of the old world were not so condemned but that they might be redeemed from them by the descension of Christ who is said by Saint Peter to be quickned in the Spirit by the which he preached to the spirits in prison which