Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n earth_n know_v lord_n 11,169 5 3.8072 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A05807 Two sermons The angell guardian. The light enlightening. Preached by Iohn Bayly ... Bayly, John, 1595 or 6-1633. 1630 (1630) STC 1601; ESTC S101096 9,574 22

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Iob. 38.7 Heb. 1.7 Deut. 4.10 and in regard of vs moreouer they are called watch-men continually as my text speakes encamping themselues about vs. To this it 's replied that these we haue now lastly spoken of are names in generall giuen vnto all the Angells True But is not the name of Angell it selfe a generall name and why then should they make a distinct order of Angells from the rest We doe not deny but that there are diverse orders and degrees of Angells God is the God of order noe author of Confusion he doth not approve of ataxie There is order among all the creatures of God even in hell it selfe there is some vnrulye order there is a Prince of darkenesse One starre differreth from another in glorye 1. Cor. 15.40 and there are diverse mansions prepared for the Elect in heauen and yet the elect shall be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Angells be there Math. 22.3 It is not therefore vnlike but that as the starrs and as the Saints the Angells may differ in mensura gloriae among themselues in degrees of glory non gaudij though not of ioyes But to define as you heard the schoolemen doe in particular wherein this same diversitye cōsisteth as if they had come downe from heauen to tell men vpon earth what order was kept there we say things secret belong vnto the Lord our God but things revealed only vnto vs. Or with Saint Hierome dicant qui possunt lett them say it that can proue it I confesse I doe not know it Boni Theologi est semper aliquid ignorare This is ignorantia originaliter invincibilis and therefore not Culpabilis Why is it Esay 6.2 that the Angells are there described thus with one paire of wings they cover their faces and with an other paire their feete doubtlesse to teach vs that we in via are no way able to prye into the nature of the Angells no nor the Angells in patria into the essence and nature of God who as he is infinite may not be comprehended by them they are finite Difference there is of glory among the Angells but what that difference is we know not the schoolemen will tell you if they lye not and further of what order and degree those Angells are which as my text speakes doe encampe themselfes about vs. Which is the 2d pointe we proposed to intreate of To this end they doe distinguish those 9. orders of Angells wee speake of into 2. generall sorts Some they make of the privie Chamber as it were and some they place in the Lobbye some they tell vs are assistant and some are ministring spirits Assistant spirits are such as doe continually reside about and attend vpon the throne of God Ministring spirits are such as are sent out or imployed on errands in the inferior world Now the 4. first orders of seraph Cher throanes and dominations they state to be assistant The 5. later to be Ministring spirits And yet I take it to be no contradiction to say That the same Angell at the same time though not in the same respect is both ministring and assistant too Greg. l. 2. Mor c. 3. faciem patris semper vident for their assistancye tamen ad nos veniunt for their ministrye But Saint Paule makes this a meere tale Heb. 1.14 Where he tells vs of the Angells that they are all ministring spiritts Omnes sunt administratorii spiritus Heb. 1.14 ordina sic literam sayes Hugo Cardinalis vpon that text reade it thus They are all etiam de superiori ordine of the highest degree ministring spirits sent out and that missione exteriori a Cherub it was that was sett to keepe the way vnto the tree of life and a seraphim it was who with a cole in his hand did some times touch the Prophets lippes Esay 6.6 Intelligere autem proprie debemus ea scripturae loca quae sine incommodo sic possunt intelligi it is S. August rule wee must vnderstand what the scripture speakes according to the letter of the text if we find no plaine in convenience of contradiction vnto other places in it Gen 3.24 You haue heard then that there is no order of Angells Supposing that there be orders of Angells exempted from encamping as my text speakes about them that feare God The third thing that wee are to intreate of is whether there be one Angell Guardian only or more assigned to attend vs pro singulis generum you must take it The Platonists did teach as I haue read in Proclus that every man had three special Angells in this kind to attend vpon him The 1. was sacer daemon and he had chargde over the reasonable soule to inspire good thoughts and wholesome councells and to encline the will of them over whom their chardge was to performe that which they did suggest for good The 2d was Genius And he had chardge over the outward life to promote and further them vnto whom he was assigned towards the attaynement of that fortune indefinitely good or bad vnto which as they spake the borne was destinate He therefore that had a good Genius was proverbially sayd to be bene natus Albae Galinae filius happy and fortunate in all his actions The 3d was spiritus Professionis and his office it was to helpe and further men in their speciall callings and trades of life Hence it was that if the profession which men betooke themselves vnto was also agreeing to the Genius of their nativity or birth such men they taught must needs be excellent and singular in what they did apply themselues vnto as having both their Genius inclining and their spiritus Professionis to helpe them in it vis vnita fortior But if any man should attempt a thing Invita Minerva contrarie vnto his Genius doe his spiritus Professionis the best it can he shall never evade rare or excellent therin This I haue related not that I doe aproue it but that you may see how that the heathen did know ingenerall although they erred in the particular Concerning this doctrine of Angellicall protection we are now to intreate of Est Chorus Indigetum mortalibus additus agris that we are protected by the Angells that is true but whether by one or more that is questioned by more then one For sometimes in scripture wee reade of many Angells appointed vnto one man sometimes of one Angell vnto many men sometimes of one Angell vnto one man too Gen. 32.1 We reade that Iacob sawe a whole hoste of Angells round about him And 2. Kings 6.17 Elishaes servant sawe the mountaynes full of horses and fier full of Angells about the Prophet Againe We read that an Angell in the singular was sent to deliuer all Israell and they were plurall out of Egipt And at the seige of Ierusalem by Senacherib God sent an Angell that slew 185000. of the Assirians their enemyes in one night And againe it is not improbable that