Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heaven_n	church_n	earth_n	triumphant_a	4,427	5	11.4398	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16567	A defence of that most ancient and sacred ordinance of Gods, the Sabbath day Consequently, and together with it. 2. A defence of the iiijth commandement. 3. A defence of the integrity and perfection of the Decalogue, morall law, or X. commandements. 4. A defence also of the whole and intire worship of God, in all the partes thereof, as it is prescribed, in the first table of the Decalogue. 5. A discouery of the superstition, impurity and corruption of Gods worship; yea, and idolatry, committed by multitudes, in sanctifying the Lords day, for a Sabbath day, by the iiijth commandement. Vndertaken against all anti-Sabbatharians, both of Protestants, Papists, Antinomians, and Anabaptists; and by name and especially against the X ministers, ... by Theophilus Brabourne.	Brabourne, Theophilus, b. 1590.	1632 (1632)	STC 3473; ESTC S120442	538,800	670

may befale any Church of God on earth for it is a property of the Church Triumphant in heauen to be freed from all erroures Now that A Church of God on earth may faile I proue by theise instances The Patriarkes they liued in polygamie hauing many wines which for any man now to doe were a sinne against the 7th com Againe the Iewes vsed to put away their wiues giuing them a bill of diuorce now that Church liued a long time in this errour against the 7th commandement vntill Christ came who reformed it Mat. 19.7.8.9 Againe did not the Church of Galatia fale into a greate errour when the Apostle taxed them as if they had bene remoued away vnto an other gospell Gal. 1.6 Againe did not Christ reproue the Churches of Pergamus and of Thyatira for corruptiones in them by suffering them that maintained the doctrine of Balaam of the Nicholaitanes and the woman Iezabell Reuel 2.12 13.14.15.18.20 Lastly and to add no more how came it about if a Church of God cannot erre about such a point as the Sabbath day that those purest and primitiue Churches which liued immediatly after the Apostles did neglect to keepe this Lords day Sabbath for diuerse hundreth of yeeres for so saith M. Perkins they did and citeth his author Leo Anton Edict see Perk in his first volume vpō the 4th com pag. 48. surely my aduersaries will iudge this a foule errour in those Churches by all which examples it is too too apparent that a Church of God may erre that too in Morall dueties commanded in the Morall Law whence it is plaine that they erre who build their faith vpon this fundation that the Church of God cannot erre OBIECT VII An other obiection against the Lords Sabbath is this that if we admit of the old Sabbath againe thē we shall bring Iudaisme into the Church and be guilty of a kind of Heresy c. Wherevnto I answer it followeth not for the Primitiue Churches were of a contrary iudgement as it appeareth by Athanasius in his Homilie de semente wee assemble togheter saith Athanasius in the Sabbath day not as if we weere sicke of Iudaisme but therefore we meete on the Sabbath that we may worship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath Where you see that Athanasius in the name of the Church testifieth that they were not infected with Iudaisme because they kept the Sabbath day the same may also be true of our Church we may keepe the Sabbath day and yet be free from Iudaisme It is to be noted that not euery thing which the Iewes practised was to be accounted for Iudaisme for then the whole Morall Law should be Iudaisme wherefore those things onely are to be accounted for Iudaisme which neuer came into the Morall Law or 10 com and which were written by Moses of which number were their Sacrifices Priestes meate new moones feastes annuall Sabbaths but as for this old Sabbath wherin God himselfe rested this was put into the Morall Law and written by the finger of God and to sanctify this Sabbath is no more Iudaisme then to honour our Superioures is Iudaisme for why should the things commanded in the 4th com be more Iudaisme then the things commanded in the 5th com Since they cannot proue this Sabbath to be a ceremony and abolished as you haue seene in the 4th part of this booke it is therefore absurd for them to call the Sanctification of the Sabbath Iudaisme Yet further since they onely who keepe the Sabbath doe obserue yeeld obedience to the Law in the integrity perfection therof and doe giue God his wholl worship in all the parts thereof they may as well say it is Iudaisme for a man to be intire and pefect in the Law and to giue God his wholl worship intirly and brand him with Iudaisme vnlesse he will mancle Gods Law and be partiall in the Law and in Gods worship seruing God by halues And further if it be Iewish and Iudaisme to keepe the Sabbath day to wit the old Sabbath day then 1. the 4th com is Iewish for it commands nothing but Sanctification of the old Sabbath day 2. If it be Iudaisme to keepe the old Sabbath then is it Iudaisme for Ministers to call in the Pulpit for the Sanctification of the Lords Sabbaths to vse the name Sabbath day for this is as well a Iewish name as the keeping of it is a Iewish practise if we may vse the name without tincture of Iudaisme why not the thing named also 3. What is the keeping of the Lords day better then Iewish for doe not we resemble the Jewes by setting a part on wholl day in euery weeke for Gods worship as they did 4. Since the Sabbath day was commanded to be kept in imitation of God as that we should Rest on the 7th day because God rested on the same day Exod. 20.10.11 men may therefore say it is Iewish Iudaisme to become followers of God 5. Since the Sabbath was kept in memory of the Creation men may say it is Iewish to celebrate weekly a thankfull remembrance of the Creation For matter of Haeresy both Athanasius Ignatius and the primitiue Churches obseruation of the Sabbath day will cleere vs of Haeresy to obserue the Sabbath with its typicall shadowish quality as a signe Shaddow of Christ if euer it were so this were Haeresy but renowncing all shadowish respectes to keepe it onely as a signe of the Creation remembrance thereof as a sacred time for the worship of God as a fit time to exercise mercy in to man beast by a rest from laboures so as an helpe vnto these morall dueties of rest God worship this can be no Haeresy for we refraine those meates in a fast which were shadowish obserue Whie-Sunday or Pentecost day which was a shaddow of Christ yet are farre enough from Haeresy see Act. 21.20.26 Rom. 14.5 hereto I might add the Testimonies of all those Diuines iustifying this point for orthodox which you shall find hereafter in my third argument for the defence of the ancient Sabbath I grant the Laodicean Counsaile anathematized it but the more ancient more pure Churches Sanctified it If it be Haeresy to keepe Gods Sabbaths then 1. it is Haeresy for Ministers in Pulpits to vse the name Sabbath day 2. It is Haeresy to celebrate a day weekly in a thankfull remembrance of the Creation 3. It is heresy for the Church and people of God to become followers of God by working whē he wrought resting when he rested 4. It is heresy to walke in obedience to the 4th cō 5. It is heresy to be intire perfect in Gods Law to haue an vnpartiall respect vnto all Gods commandements yea it is heresy to giue God his wholl worship intirly In a word since the Sanctification of the Sabbath is a part of Gods worship if for all that men will call it heresy I say

Law for whereas our Sauiour ratifieth the very least of the commandements in v. 19. expoundeth the 6th Com. to forbid rash anger calleing a mans brother foole v. 22. and expoundeth the 7th Com. to forbid a lustfull looke ver 28. and the 3d Com. to forbid swearing by the creature v. 34.36 and the 2d table to command loue to our enemies v. 44. a man may at once cut off all these from binding vs if he will but suppose that these enlargments of the Law being so strict rigorouse were Iewish and pertaine not vnto Christians for the better auoiding of them he may answer that Christ ratified the Law thus expounded but vntill his death passion were not this a goodly answer 2. It is false which they say that all things were fulfilled at Christ his passion It is true indeed that Christ vpon the Crosse said it is finished Ioh. 19.30 that is his death passion was finished but yet all things were not finished for the Resurrection was behind Wherefore the truer sense is by these words till all things be fulfilled to vnderstand euen all things whatsoeuer Christ was to doe for his Church and all things which were any way prophecied of him or of his Church militant as this for one Christ tarrieth now at the right hand of God vntill his enemies be made his footestoole Hebr. 10.12.13 This one thing is not yet fulfilled see 1 Cor. 15.25 an other thing is that the heauens must containe Christ vntill the time that all things be restored Act. 3.21 this other thing is not yet fulfilled to wit Christ his second comeing and the restauration of all things A third thing is that the Church shall sing A triumphant song ouer death the graue sinne 1 Cor. 15.55.56 this thing is not yet fulfilled neither now since all these things shall not be fulfilled vntill the worlds end therfore the Law is to last vnto the worlds end for it must last vntill all things be fulfilled Yet further the same is euident and apparent in the Text it selfe for our Sauiour saith that the Law shall last vntill heauen earth perish or passe away that is vntill the end of the world for then shall the heauens the earth passe away and be dissolued as saith S. Peter the heauens shall passe away with a noise the elements shall melt with heate and the earth with the workes that are therein shall be burnt vp c. 2. Pet. 3.10 so long therfore as the heauens the earth last so long shall the Law euery iot and title of it last the same is ratifyed by S. Luk saying It is more easy that heauen earth should passe away then that one title of the Law should fall Luk. 16.17 Lastly suppose we that in this text there were no Prophecy at all touching the duration continuance of the Law yet forasmuch as we imbrace this Sermon which Christ preached vpon the Mount as concerning vs our times we must therefore imbrace this parte of his Sermon wherein he preached and taught that the Law with the least commandement thereof yea euery branch of this Law vnto a iot title must goe together for Christ did not onely presse the Law vpon his Disciples but also euery title of it wherefore by the same right that we imbrace the other partes passages of Christs Sermon by the same right we must imbrace also the Law euery iot and title of the Law this Diuine Sermon of Christ it is iij Chapters long it begane Mat. 5.1.4 It lasted vnto Mat. 8.1 If you may reiect some partes of this Sermon as not belonging vnto vs then may you reiect all the Sermon if you imbrace some partes then must you imbrace all thus you see their answer is vaine in goeing about to confine the duration of the Law vnto the time of Christs liuing vpon the earth or vnto his death and Passion onely 3. A third answer is that not euery iot title of the Law is now in force for there be some things in the Law that be not in force as in the preface to the commandements I am the Lord thy God that brought the out of the Land of Egypt this deliuerance out of Egypt belongeth not vnto vs Christians for we neuer were in bondagein Egypt also the reason annexed vnto the 5th com that thy dayes may be longe in the Land which the Lord thy God giueth thee this Land was Canaan therefore the promise of this Land cannot belong vnto vs Christians Herevnto I answer that the Apostle doth apply this promise vnto Christianes that liued not in Canaan as you may reade Eph. 6.1.2.3 neither doth the Lord say that thy dayes may be long in the Land of Canaan but generally thus that thy dayes may be long in the Land which God shall giue thee that is any Land into which God should bring them wherefore the promise to the 5th com is not to be restrained vnto Canaan onely but may belong vnto any Land And as for the preface touching the deliuerance out of Egypt this belongeth to this day vnto those people vnto whome it did at any time belong that is vnto the Israelites Furthermore I giue one answer seruing vnto both these which is this admit that there be some titles of the Law that doe not belong vnto vs as these two reasones annexed to the Law yet they cannot shew any titles of the Law that doe not belong vnto vs which are partes of the Law for we must distinguish betwixt the law the appurtenāces belonging to the law the law is that parte of the Decalogue which command or forbiddeth something the appurtenances of this Law are the preface to the Law the motiues or reasones to perswade to the obedience of this Law these are not deliuered in commanding or forbiddeing termes now I stand to defend by my argument nothing more in the Law then what is Law expresly commanded or forbidden neither doe I expound Christs words Mat. 5.18 Any larger then so howbeit Iiudge that Christ his words ought to be extended not onely vnto the Law but also to the appurtenances of the Law if possiblie they may where necessity absurdety doe not hinder To conclud since my argument speaketh onely of such iotes in the Law as are Law deliuered in commanding or forbidding termes their obiection is impertinent besids the matter in question to bring exceptiones of such iotes as are no law nor parte of Law bur onely appendixes to the Law for all the appurtenances belonging to the Law might possiblie be of no force yet the law it selfe may stand safely still like as a mans apparell may be worne out or burned yet his body may be safe still For a conclusion let me add one thing in generall which maketh against all their 3 answers which is this All Orthodox and sound Diuines when they haue

and in his returne he deliuered the Decrees of the Apostles to seuerall Churches where he came Act. 16.4 and so as he went along he preached as at Philippi Act. 16.12.13 and at Thessalonica Act. 17.1.2 and at Corinth Act. 18.1.4 and at last he came to Troas where he preached this sermon of which we doe inquire Act. 20.7 So then count these it will be found about a matter of 17. yeeres difference betvvixt the sermon of Peter at Pentecost and the sermon of Paul at Troas vvhere then is the constancy of the Lords day Sabbath vvhen vve can finde none kept for a matter of 17. yeeres together The 3d text wherein is mention of our new Sabbath it is 1. Cor. 16.2 vvhere Paul ordeined a collection to be made on the first day of the vveeke c. Novv how many weekes moneths or yeeres this collection was ordeined after Pauls sermon at Troas Act. 20.7 I cannot tell nor can they proue that it was the next Lords day after the sermon Paul preached at Troas so then as yet there can no constant vveekly Sabbath be proued The last text is Reu. 1.10 where S. Iohn receiued a reuelation on the Lords day now how many yeeres difference there was betvvixt the ordination for that Collection for the poore 1. Cor. 16.2 and S. Iohns Reuelation I know not neither can they proue I presume that it was on the next Lords day after that Collection So still there appeareth no constant and weekly celebration of the Lords day let their textes be considered this way or that vvay Whereas they talke so much of the constant practise of the Apostles this I dare auowch that it cannot be showne that euer Peter or Paul or any other of the Apostles of Christ did euer preach any sermons vpon tvvo Lords dayes immediatly following one an other Nay vvhich is more it cannot be shovvne that any one Apostle did euer preach tvvise in all his life time vpon the Lords day nay vvhich is yet more it can not be shovvne that all the Apostles put them all together did euer among them all preach tvvo Lords dayes together one after an other Who that considereth these things could be so blinded as to thinke this Lords day can be established proued to be a weekly Sabbath from the Apostles practise surely he that celebrateth a weekly Sabbath on the Lords day as he hath no commandement for it from Christ in the new Testament so he hath not so much as the vveekly practise of the Apostles for his warrant But my Brethren if you vvill vvalke in a vvarrantable vvay vvherein you shall haue both an expresse commandement from God and also the vveekly and constant practise of the Apostles then forsake the Lords day the Sunday Sabbath and keepe the Sabbath day the Saturday Sabbath for for it you haue the 4th com expresly and then for practise of the Apostles be pleased but to pervse these textes of Scripture and you shall find the Apostles constantly keeping the Sabbath day see Act. 13.14 42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 and this was all after Christ his resurrection Now iudge thou that readest whither the practise of the Lords day weekly or the practise of the Sabbath day weekly be more soundly proued and follow the better Be no more children wanering carried about with euery wind of doctrine by the deceit of men and with craftinesse whereby they lay in waite to deceiue Eph. 4.14 But try all things and keepe that which is good 1. Thess 5.21 Furthermore whereas it is supposed that this Lords day was kept constantly for A Sabbath I will giue instance to the contrary of all Lords dayes that euer were that first Lords day wherein Christ rose from the dead and then appeared vnto his Disciples that Lords day was the most eminent and chiefe for from this day all after Lords dayes take their name excellency this being the substance as it were and all others but shaddowes ressemblances of this for on this first Lords day was the worke of the Resurrection performed not on the others of all Coronation dayes in the Kings reigne none is so properly called Coronation day nor so excellent ioyfull as is the first Coronation day in which the Crowne is set vpon the Kings head Many keepe their Marriage dayes but of them all none is so excellent and so solemnly kept as is the first Marriage day wherein the Bride Bridgrome were ioyned together euen so it is betweene the first Lords day and other Lords dayes following after it The difference is as the body from the shaddow and as the life from the picture if therefore I shall shevv that this first Lords day vvas not kept as a Sabbath day it is more then if I should shevv that 20 Lords dayes together were omitted in the Apostles dayes after Christs ascention Further if I shall shevv that Christ himselfe and his Disciples whilst hee vvas on earth and resident vvith his Church did not keepe this first most eminent Lords day who then vvill imagine that these Disciples of Christ and this Church vvould keepe the Lords day a Sabbath after Christs departure from them ascention into heauen for vndoubtedly the Church would imitate Christ follovv his example looke vvhat they saw him doe whilst he was on earth vvith them the same vvould they doe after he was departed from them follow me saith Paul as I follow Christ 1. Cor. 11.1 Novv I shevve that this first Lords day vvas not kept as a Sabbath and Resting day because it vvas vsed for a trauailing day for this purpose see Luk. 24.1.13 vvhere you haue mention of two of Christs Disciples vvho trauailed vpon this first Lords day whereon Christ rose a matter of 15 myles and this I make good thus they went from Ierusalem for there the Disciples were resident v. 9. and they trauailed to Emmaus which Towne vvas threescore furlongs from Ierusalem as the Text saith v. 13. novv 8. furlongs make a myle so then 60. furlongs make Seauen myles and an halfe this done they returned the same day backe againe to Ierusalem v. 33. vvhich is seauen myles an halfe more so add these together they trauailed that day fiftene myles it cannot be thought that these spent lesse time then all the vvhole after noone of this first Lords day in trauailing for tvvo myles an hovvre is an ordenary tranailers pase so that fiftene myles cost them neere 8. hovvres vvorke Novv can it be thought that these two of Christs Disciples vvould haue made this day of all dayes in the yeere a trauailing day if the Church of Christ had solemnized this day as a Sabbath day at Ierusalem these two vvere two of Christs Disciples follovvers vvherefore they vvould haue laid a side all vvorkes that they might vvith ioyfulnesse haue solemnized this day in a most thankfull remembrance of Christs resurrectiō if any fame or report they had heard at

but in regard of Christs pouerty it is not vnlikly that he vsed browne or corse bread 2. By the like the Iewes might haue thus absurdly reasoned also whereas the Sabbath day was commanded on Mount Sinay Exod. 20. yea one moneths iourney before they came to Mount Sinay in the wildernesse of Sin Exod. 16.1.23 yea and in an other remote place as in that parte of the world where about Paradise was since the Sabbath was from the Creation hence the Iewes might thus peruersly haue argued saying wee are now in Canaan or in Captiuity in a country that is farr remote from Mount Sinay where the Sabbath was commanded or from the wildernesse of Sin or that parte of the world where Paradise was and where the Patriarkes kept the Sabbath and therfore we here cannot keepe the Sabbath for our Sabbath in this country begineth not at that point of time iust when the Sabbath begineth at Mount Sinay the wildernesse of Sin or about Paradise loe their folly God requireth not a people to begine his 7th day Sabbath when other remote Nations begine theirs but onely thē when by the light of the Sunne which rules the day God begineth to that people his Seauenth day This point is further prosecuted in my former booke but enough too much hath bene here said to this idle argument men haue so little reuerence of God and of his lawes and of his ancient ordinance the Sabbath that they thinke any thing is good enough how idle and ridiculouse soeuer to throw against the same euery frothie conception of an idle braine is matter sound enough to buze and make a noise in peoples eares against that sacred time which God himselfe hath hallowed sanctified honoured amongst his morales SECT VIII A 4th text is that Isa 66.23 From moneth to moneth or from new Moone to new Moone from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before me saith the Lord. Whence some collect that the Sabbath here was made a Signe of the euerlasting Sabbath in heauen others would haue it a Signe of the Church vnder the new Testament and of the Church triumphant in heauen both so it being a signe it is abolished Herevnto I answer 1. it is doubtfull what may be the proper sense of this text it being a Prophecy deliuered in Metaphoricall and Allegoricall speeches for instance what shall be meant by these words from new Moone to new Moone it is doubtfull wherefore this text being difficult it is not fit to haue a controuercy decided by it much lesse to haue it vsed to the abolishing of any thing commanded in a morall law it is not meete that the 4th com being vttered in plaine proper speeches should be contradicted countermanded by a Prophecy which is vttered in difficult improper speeches what is this but petitio principij 2. I answer by the word Sabbath here may be vnderstod not the weekly 7th day morall Sabbath inioyned in the morall law but some of the anniuersary ceremoniall Sabbathes which neuer came into the morall law as that Sabbath of the Seauenth yeere or of the fiftith yeere Leuit. 25.10.4 for since the text speaketh of a continuall worshiping of God vnder the new Testament therefore the Sabbath of a yeere is more fit to be a type of it then the Sabbath of a day the 7th day 3. I answer the Sabbath day here mentioned is not made a Signe but rather the other 6 dayes which goe betwence Sabbath and Sabbath for so the text saith from Sabbath to Sabbath that is all the dayes betwene the Sabbaths shall all flesh come to worship c. so then it is not the Sabbath day that was made a Signe but those Six dayes which went betwene the Sabbathes SECT IX A 5th text of theirs is Heb. 4.10.11 where there is mention of a Rest and in v. 9. there remaineth therefore a Rest vnto the people of God Here say they the Sabbath or Rest is made a type of the Rest in the Kingdome of heauen now all types are abolished as ceremonies Herevnto I answer 1. many thinke indeed that here is some greate matter in this text for their purpose but it will proue vpon better examination nothing so for if this Rest here mentioned be a type of heauen it is so farr off from making any thing against the Sabbath day as that it rather maketh for it for the nature of types is to last in the Church vntill the thing typed out by them be come thus all sacrifices lasted vntill Christ our pascall Lamb was comne sacrificed for vs wherefore by like reason if this Rest or Sabbath heere be a type of the kingdome of heauens rest then may this Rest and Sabbath last in the Church vntill we all come to a rest in the kingdome of heauen so then all the time we liue on earth this Sabbath may be kept 2. I answer if the aduersaries to this ordinance of Gods Sabbath could tell how to proue the Rest in the 4th com a ceremony by this text then hereby they must wholly ouerthrow the 4th com for take away rest from laboures as an abolished ceremony and then may men labour in their caleings euery man in his seuerall family in his seuerall field and how then can there be any publike assemblies of the people together in the Church to keepe a Sabbath 3. I answer suppose we that there was a type in the word Rest yet since it speaketh not of a dayes rest but of an euerlasting rest therfore may the yeere of Iubile the 50th yeere be made a type here rather thē the 7th day for there is greater similitude betwene the 50th yeere Leuit. 25.10.11.4.1 and the euerlasting rest then betwene the 7th day Exod 20.8 and the euerlasting rest SECT X. A 6th text they vse which is Numb 28.9.10 where it was commanded vnto the Iewes to offer ij lambes for a Sacrifice on the Sabbath day whence they would collect that if the Sacrifices being a duety of the Sabbath be abolished then is the Sabbath it selfe aboiished Herevnto I answer 1. if the Sabbath day be abolished togeather with the sacrificing of the ij lambes then must for the same reason also be abolished rest from laboures and the morall worship of God in the Sabbath for the sacrificing of the lambes on the Sabbath day hath as much respect vnto rest from labour Gods worship to declare them also to be ceremonies as vnto the time to declare it to be a ceremony abolished 2. I answer that this law of offering ij lambes on the Sabbath day it was aduentitiouse onely added to the 4th com to the Sabbath for a time and therefore no parte of the 4th com nor essentiall Sabbath duety for it was neuer wrote by God in Tables of stone but wrote by Moses as were other ceremonies all after the writing of the moral law was finished and therefore no parte of

trueth of Gods and espetially his Majestie and if once God shallincline his heart to the loue of this trueth a word from his mouth may reforme it his Decree proclamation or the like were enough to make this impossible thing possible OBIECT IV. An other obiection is that Gods Church is now at a sweete peace and concord and the bringing of this point to light will but make a greate hurly burly and disturbance in the Church wherefore the Author might be better occupied or else be silent Herevnto I answer this obiection is indeed euery where heard of and indeed the peace of the Church is to be sought to the vtmost but yet we must not be so mindfull of peace as to forget holinesse for the Apostle hath ioyned these ij together saying Follow peace with all men and holinesse without the which no man shall see the Lord Heb. 12.14 peace with the Church in keeping the Lords day and warre with God in profaning of his Sabbath day is no comfortable nor safe peace Let me desire such as rest vpon thes obiection to reade perpend what the Lord spake by his Prophet Isaiah against the people that would not heare Gods Law but rather such things as might please them make no disturbance amongst them saying It is a rebelliouse people children that would not heare the Law of the Lord which say vnto the Seers see not and to the Prophets Prophesy not vnto vs right things but speake flattering things vnto vs Isa 30.9.10 The gloriouse Gospell the Gospell of peace the word of Trueth did it bringe peace into the world no I am come saieth our Sauiour to put fier on the earth Luk. 12.49 againe Thinke not that I am come to send peace into the earth but the sword to set a man at variance against his father the daughter against hir mother Mat. 10.34 such is the frowardnesse of mans nature as this trueth of Gods Sabbath will neuer enter neither with the peace of men OBIECT V. An other obiection is this what shall we doe say some Ministers are at variance one saith the old Sabbath day is in force still others say that it is abolished longe agone by the coming of Christ wherefore I shall giue no regard to this new Doctrine vntill Ministers can agree among themselues and till all men be at one accord in this matter for they bring reasones on both sids so as a man cannot tell which to beleeue Herevnto I answer if men shall tarry till all men are agreed so they shall professe no trueth nor any Religion for all men are not at accord in any Religion nor almost in any point of Religion wherefore it is a better way first to consider of the matter in question whither it be a difference about words or about things and whither about things substantiall or circumstanciall as ceremonies are and as the matter is of weight more or lesse so to regard it more or lesse for such may the controuercy be as it may concerne not some men but all men such it may be as may concerne all men very neerly now of this kind is this controuercy for it is not a difference about words or vnnecessary circumstances or about that which concerneth but some few men onely but it is about an ordinance of God expresly commanded in his morall Law and therefore it is a substanciall matter and concerneth all and euery man neerly like as doe all the 10 commandements and therefore people must not put off the matter vntill Ministers be agreed vnlesse they will be wilfully ignorāt in a matter off greate importance and which so nerely concerneth them as doth all the things commanded in the 10 commandements It is a Catechisme point to know Gods Sabbath day and a point of greate consequence neerly concerning vs all as appeareth not onely because it is an ordinance established by the Morall Law but also in this that it is put downe in euery Catechisme as behofefull for euery one to be acquainted with all now if such a point come into controuercy all men should giue attendance vnto it and study it vntill the trueth be boulted out Neither let this be any stumbling blocke because this Doctrine is new for albeit it be new vnto our times yet it is as old Doctrine as is any in the 10 commandements but what if it be new to thee the Doctrine of the Gospell was as new to the Bereanes as the Doctrine of the Sabbath can be to thee and yet they did not argue thus carelesly as you doe saying Paul hath broched a new point of one Christ c. And he is singular and all alone all our Doctoures teachers are contrary to him wherefore we will not harken to what he saith but contrarywise they tooke the matter presently into consideration they fell to serch and examine the Scriptures to see if the things Paul taught were so or not and are therefore commended by the holy Ghost vnto all Posterity oh that men in these times would turne Bereanes and serch the Scriptures to see if I speak according to them or not if I bring not an expresse commandement for that I cale for let me be reiected or try whither they or I come with Thus saith the Lord in our mouthes I bring you the plaine Scripture to wit the 4th com and they bring you nothing but their reasones and consequences which they say come out of Scripture if one may beleeue them but since their reasons and consequences doe thwart and crosse a plaine commandement of Almightie Gods therefore their reasons consequences against the Sabbath day are to be reiected for mans reason must not contradict Gods expresse word vnlesse we will set reason aboue Scripture would people but marke these things they should not be long in doubt vnlesse they will Neither should they neede care that Ministers are at variance for they might easily see which side to take parte withall side it with him which bringeth the expresse word of God rather then with them which haue no word but onely a fewe reasones in vented by mans cauilling braine OBIECT VI. An other obiection is this to say that the old Sabbath day is still in force is to say by consequence that our Church is in an errour now can it be thought that the Church of God can lay in such an errour as this touching Gods Sabbath day it is impossible Herevnto I answer that it is meete we should hold as honourable an opinion of our Church as may be and yet for all that we are not bound to beleeue that it is a thing impossible for our Church to be in an errour in as great an errour too as is this there are ij sortes of erroures there is an errour of maliciousnesse wilfulnesse against the light of conscience there is an errour of frailty ignorance this latter kindof errour may doth befale euery godly person and