Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n body_n glorious_a vile_a 2,633 5 9.7400 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A74986 An antidote against heresy: or a preservative for Protestants against the poyson of Papists, Anabaptists, Arrians, Arminians, &c. and their pestilent errours. Shewing the authors of those errours, their grounds and reasons, the time when and occasion how they did arise; with general answers to their arguments taken out of holy scripture and the ancient fathers. Written to stay the wandering and stablish the weak in these dangerous times of Apostasy. / By Richard Allen, M.A. sometime Fellow of Penbrooke [sic] Colledge in Oxford. Allen, Richard, b. 1604 or 5. 1648 (1648) Wing A1045A; Thomason E1168_2; ESTC R208803 57,457 159

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and be united to our souls and both together be taken into everlasting joy or depart into everlasting sorrow Errours The first adversaries that we read of were the Sadduces who denyed the Resurrection but were put to silence by our Saviour Mat. 21. afterwards Hymeneus and Philetus whose words eate like a canker 2 Tim. 2.17 Then Simon Magus Menander and their followers At this day the Familists and other fanaticks will understand no resurrection but a rising from sin or that the resurrection spoken of at the last day is not to be understood literally of the body naturall but mystically of a certain spirituall body that all the Saints shall be gathered into and that the body of flesh shall be annihilated and for ever brought to nothing 3. The Manichees imagined a certain Pythagorean transmigration of souls out of one body into another and 4. The Anabaptists imagine we shall rise again but with other new bodies not the same that now we have But 1 Cor. 15.19 30 32. Antidote If in this life onely we have hope in Christ we are of all men most miserable why stand we in jeopardie every houre If the dead rise not let us eate and drink for to morrow we shal dye but be not deceived for Joh. 5.28 The hour shal come that all that be in the grave shal hear his voyce 1 Cor. 15.52 For the trumpet shall sound and the dead shal be raised Revel 20.13 The Sea shal deliver up the dead that are in it death and the grave shal deliver up the dead that are in them 2 Cor. 5.10 For we must al appear before the tribunal of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body Job 19.26 Though after my skin wormes consume this bodie yet shal I see God in my flesh whom I my self shal see and mine eyes shal behold and none others for me CHAP. XIX Of Glorification in Heaven Truth ANd whom he Justified them he also glorified after the resurrection and the last Judgement is past the Saints or chosen of God shal go with Christ in triumph into heaven and there reign with him for ever Errours Cerinthus of old taught which he said he received by Revelation from Angels That Christ should reign after the resurrection 1000 yeares upon earth where the Saints should enjoy all pleasures of the flesh This doctrine that false Prophet Mahomet embraced and put in his Alchoran and is greedily embraced not onely of his followers but also of the Anabaptists and other among us who expect such a temporary kingdome wherein the godly shal reign alone and inherit the earth after that the wicked be all destroyed The Familists say The joyes of heaven are here in this world c. But 1 Thess 4.17 Antidote The Lord shal descend from heaven to what place to the earth no but then we that are alive shal be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the ayre and so shal we ever be with the Lord. 2 Cor. 5.1 When this earthly Tabernacle is dissolved i. when we dye our next building or habitation to dwell in is eternal in the heavens 1 Pet. 1.4 The inheritance of the Saints is reserved in heaven for them where 2 Tim. 4.8 a Crown is laid up for them and 2 Cor. 2.9 things prepared for them that the heart of man cannot conceive But Phil. 3.20 their vile body shal be made like the glorious body of Christ Dan. 12.3 They shall shine as stars for ever and ever Revel 22.5 the Saints shal raign in heaven for ever and ever as for those 2000 years Rev. 20. they are to be understood of the condition of the Saints in this present world when Satan was bound 1000 years that he could not deceive the Nations CHAP. XX. Of Hell Truth BUt the Reprobates wicked and ungod●y men after they have received their fearfull doome shal go into the everlasting torment of hell fire prepared for the devil and his Angels There be some that say there is neither Devill nor hell Errours no Devil or evill spirit but a mans own vile affections nor hel but a mans own evill conscience 2. Others say there is a hell but not till the day of Judgement 3. Others that hell tormen●s are not everlasting but that the damned and devils themselves shall be saved at last as a Sect of old called therefore Liberatores sayd or as many as in hell call for mercy say the Turks Antidote But 2 Pet. 2.4 The Angels which fel at the beginning were cast down into Hel and delivered into chains of darknesse Jude 6. Everlasting chains where 2 Thess 1.9 Their destruction shal be everlasting Mar. 9.44 Their worm never dyes their fire never is quenched Revel 20.10 Are tormented day and night for ever and ever there were devils then and a hel from the beginning into which with the Devill and his Angels the reprobates all wicked men are cast Mat. 25.41 not for a time but for ever for out of hell there is no Redemption Luc. 16.26 betwixt that and heaven there is a great gulf fixt so that th●re is no passing between Deut. 32.29 Oh that men were wise then they would understand this they would consider their latter end CHAP. XXI Of Purgatory THere is no other third or middle place between Heaven and Hell Truth whereunto the souls departed do go And therefore the doctrine of Purgatory with all its appendices as pardons prayers for the dead c. are not only fond vain and unwarrantable but heathenish also blasphemous Errours This was a device of the old Heathens was received among Christians first by Simon Magus Montanus and other leud Hereticks and is now embraced by none but the Roman Church through the covetousness and filthy lucre of their Clergy because it fils not only the Popes coffers but also the private purse of every mass Priest The place they say is next unto hell the pains of it are all one with hell fire though some mitigate the matter But King Henry the fourth of France resolved this doubt best of any The time it lasts is till the day of Judgment at utmost no longer and yet if surviving friends wil pay the Priest pray or the Pope but say the word they may be released at any time sooner It was invented for the purging of souls departed which had not fully fatisfied in this life Antidote But as there be but two sorts of men in this world so there are but two places prepared for them in the world to come and as there are but two places so there are but two ways and gates that lead unto those two places Whereof you read Mat. 7.13 14. If there were a third place certainly our Saviour who came to teach and afterwards sent his Spirit to lead us in the way of all truth would have shewed us the way to that place too But seeing the
Abraham is ignorant of us and Israel doth not acknowledg us Eccles 9.5 The dead know not any thing Job 5.1 Call now if there be any that will answer and to which of the Saints wilt thou turn If Paul were a Mediatour then the rest of his fellow Apostles were so too and if there be many Mediatours then S. Paul's saying 1 Tim. 2.5 doth not hold good that there is but one Mediatour c. August lib. 2. Cont. Epist Parmen cap. 8. Christ is Mediatour according to both natures according to his humane he suffered and dyed by the power of his divine he overcame death and rose again without his humane nature he could not suffer without his Divine to give price and value to his sufferings he had not satisfied therefore it is said God purchased his Church with his own blood Acts 20.28 Both natures did work in this Office of Mediatourship each of them doing his own proper work and yet both together producing but one common effect CHAP. IX The Death of Christ. Truth THe Office of Christ as Mediatour consists of three parts whereof his Priesthood is principal and of his Priesthood that oblation he made of himself upon the Cross whereby as the only Sacrifice for sin he pacified the wrath of God and redeeming our souls from eternal death purchased for us the favou● of God and life everlasting Errours Adversaries to this truth are 1. Arrians and Socinians who affirm Th● Christ by his death did not satisfie for our sins 2. Papists who say That Christ by his death indeed satisfied for our sins and for the eternal punishment due unto us for them but for the temporal punishment we must satisfie out selves either in this life or else hereafter in purgatory 3. Arminians affirm That Christ dyed for all men as well those that perish as those that are saved for Cain and Judas as well as Abell and Peter From whence 4. Another riseth That a man whom Christ dyed for may perish The death of Christ being the consummation and total sum as it were Antidote of all his sufferings from his cradle to his grave is therefore commonly taken for the whole satisfaction that he made unto God for our sins To the Adversaries we say First That Christ by his death did satisfie for our sins Isai 53.5 8 10. His soul was made an offering for sin c. Mat. 20.28 A ransom for many 1 Cor. 5.7 A Sacrifice for us Rom. 4.25 He was delivered to death for our sins And 5.10 We were reconciled by his death 1 Pet. 2.24 He bare our sins in his own body on the tree Object But Micah 7.18 God forgives iniquity because he delights in mercy If Christ satisfie for sin how is it mercy Sol. Christs merits and Gods mercy stand and agree together very wel Christ hath satisfied and yet we are freely forgiven because God exacts nothing of us but of Christ It is free to us we payed nothing and though Christ made satisfaction yet still our sins are freely forgiven us because Christ himself for whose sake our sins are forgiven us was freely given us Secondly Christ satisfied not only for eternal but temporal punishment aso For otherwise 1. It could not stand with Christs all-sufficient Sacrifice who trod the wine-press of his Fathers wrath alone and none helped him Isai 63.3 if we must satisfie for some part our selves 2. It cannot stand with Gods mercy who forgives us freely for Christs sake 3. It cannot stand with his Justice when the fault is forgiven in exact any punishment but they confess Christ hath satisfied for the fault fully therefore in Justice there can be no punishment left for us to undergo Thirdly Christ dyed not for all but only for the elect Mat 1.21 He shall save his people John 10.15 I lay down my life for the sheep And 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world c. Fourthly A man that Christ hath dyed for can never perish John 10.15 And I give them eternal life and they shall never perish c. 1 Pet. 1.5 They are kept the Power of God unto salvation and what is able to controll that power Object But Christ is a ransom for all 1 Tim. 2.6 Dyed for every man Heb. 2.9 For the whole world 1 John 2.2 Sol. By world is meant the world of Gods Elect so it is taken John 6.33 and John 17.9 for the reprobate only By all understand all sorts and degrees of men all Countries and Nations not the whole multitude of mankind but the amplitude of grace only August Tract 45. in Joan. He spared not his own Son but delivered him for us all Rom. 8.32 For all whom for the elect as it follows v. 33. Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods Elect ●ld Cont. Donat. God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself and the son of man came not to judg the world but to save it but the world is not reconciled unto God nor saved unless by world ye understand the Church which is both reconciled and saved Id. Epist. 48. Tom. 2. The whole world lyeth in wickedness i. the tares that grow all the world over And again Christ is a propitiation for the sins of the whole world i. for the wheat that likewise grows all world over CHAP. X. Resurrection of Christ Truth CHRIST did truly rise again from death and took his body flesh and bones and all things appertaining to the perfection of mans nature wherewith he ascended into Heaven and there fitteth at Gods right hand until he return again to judgment at the end of the world Errours David George the Father of the Family affirmed That Christs body was dissolved into ashes and so rose no more as of old Apelles said It was resolved into the four Elements whereof it was at first compounded 2. The Swenkfeldians affirm That it is quite layed aside 3. The Vbiquitaries That it is every where even as his Godhead is every where 4. There be at this day who affirm That it is in the Sun an old heresie of the Manichees and Seleucians who affirmed That Christ in his ascension left his body in the Sun taking their ground for it from Psal 19.5 He set his tabernacle in the Sun as they read It is no great matter to beleeve that Christ dyed this the Jews Heathen Antidote and all wicked men beleeve but the faith of Christians is the Resurrection of Christ August in Psal 120. This one point is the very lock and key of all Christian Religion For 1 Cor. 15.14 If Christ be not risen then is our preaching vain our faith is also vain we are still in our sins But Mark 16.6 He is not here he is risen 1 Cor. 15.4 He was seen of Cephas then of the twelve then of five hundred brethren at once Acts 2.31 Neither did his flesh see corruption Mark 16.19 He was received into Heaven and sate at
the yeare 1215 and this is now the opinion of the Papists followed with many Blasphemies Idolatries and ridiculous Mummeries The second is of Consubstantiation invented by some who to shun the absurdities of the former opinion fell into worse affirming That the substance of bread and wine and of the body and blood of Christ are joyntly or both together bodily present and eaten in the Sacrament the body of Christ being in with and under the bread The first Author of this opinion and the time when it began is uncertainly reported and although it were long before Luther yet it was taken up in haste by him about the year 1525. is still maintained by his followers and gave occasion to continue that bowing and cringing that was lately used to the Communion Table The third is of bare figure and only signification affirming That in the Sacrament there is nothing but bread and wine bare signs and no other presence of Christs body but only in figure and signification so that the faithful receive nothing but naked and bare signs The foundation of this Errour was layd about four hundred years after Christ by some Hereticks that came as short of this mystery as the Capernaites went too far making no account of this Sacrament saying that it did neither good nor hurt This Errour was set on foot again by Carolostadius a rash-brained man about the year 1524. and is now followed by the Anabaptists Antidote The doctrin of our Church Art 28. is the same that the Apostle delivers 1 Cor. 10.16 To all the three Adversaries together we say If there be nothing in the Sacrament but bare signs why doth our Saviour say of the elements This is my body and this is my blood And S. Paul The bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ If his body and blood be not there at all And if his body and blood be there corporally and carnally present even whole Christ why then doth our Saviour say Do this in remembrance of me And St. Paul Ye shew forth the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 10. And St. Peter That the heavens shall receive him to the end of the world Acts 3.21 Refusing then and denying both Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation as more then our Saviour intended in these words This is my body c. And also bare signification as a great deal less we admit and acknowledg Transmutation or a change and that great and marvellous in the use of the Elements not in substance but in vertue power and operation The sanctified signs are in substance creatures in signification mysteries in operation the things themselves whose names they bear the change is in their operation and use and therefore also in their names For Christ hath honoured the Symboles with the names or appellation of his body and blood not changeing their nature but adding grace unto nature Theodoret in Dial. In the Sacrament then there must needs be more then bare signs or naked Elements for how should earthly bread be an Instrument of heavenly grace and life to quicken and strengthen the soul but by some great and marvellous change which change is not in the substance of the creatures but in their vertue power and operation and such vertue power and operation could not be unless the very body and blood of Christ were truly present truly given and truly received in the Sacrament And yet the body and blood of Christ is not present given or received corporally and carnally the bread and wine being turned into the body and blood of Christ as the Papists affirm For 1. It is contrary to the Scripture 1 Cor. 11.28 Where after consecration they are called bread and wine 2. It overthrows the nature of a Sacrament for where is no Element there can be no Sacrament 3. It is contrary to nature it self that an accident should be without its subject 4. Experience dayly shews that the Elements by continuance corrupt by eating nourish the body go down into the belly c. which cannot be said of accidents or of the body and blood of Christ 5. A carnal eating is unavailable to salvation by the Papists own confession unless it be done by Faith but receiving by Faith without carnal eating is available Concil Trident. Sess 13. c. 8. et Cat. Rom. Why then is it contended for Lastly It is contrary to their own Canon taken out of St. Augustine Can. Vt Quid. Object But Christ himself said This is my body the night before he dyed no time to utter dark Parables but plain words Sol. He took the cup also and said This is my blood Mark 14.23.24 If you understand it litterally then the cup and not the wine must be turned into blood but if here be a plain figure their subtilest Doctours cannot tell how to avoyd it then why not a time to speak in figures Why not This is my body a figure too But when our Saviour says This is my body he doth not intend to shew what the bread is but what his body is not that the bread is turned into his flesh but that his body is food for our souls even as bread is for our bodies It shews not any conversion of one substance into another but only the relation that is between them He which before called his body bread John 6. doth now call the bread his body that by this cha●ge of names we might understand and beleeve the change that is made by grace and not so much heed the things we see as mind the the things we see not Theod. Dialog 1. Why dost thou prepare thy teeth and thy belly This is no meat for the belly but for the mind beleeve and thou hast eaten Augustine in Joan. Tract 25. ad cap. 6. 2. Consubstantiation is farther from the truth then Transubstantiation neither so possible nor probable It is not so likely or agreeable to our Saviours words who says This is my body and not my body is in with or under the bread And yet they are both gross Errours and the occasions of gross Idolatry They are both far from our blessed Saviours meaning when he spake the words This is my body from the Apostles sense 1 Cor. 11. From the Judgment of the Ancient Fathers who call the elements signs figures types c. of the body and blood of Christ and particularly St. Augustine says the words this is my body are to be understood in a figurative not a litteral sense l. 3. de Doct. Christ And besides they are impossible in nature But setting aside that barren opinion of bare sign and figure the question between us and the rest is not about the substance of the thing for we confess That the very body and blood of Christ is given and received all the question is about the manner they say it is corporally and carnally we grant indeed it is really if by really you understand truly and indeed but yet that it