Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heaven_n	bind_v	earth_n	retain_v	2,475	5	9.8230	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A44394	Four tracts by the ever memorable Mr. John Hales of Eaton College. Viz. I. Of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. II. Of the power of the keyes. III. Of schism and schismaticks. IV. Missellanies.	Hales, John, 1584-1656.	1677 (1677)	Wing H268A; ESTC R223741	37,038	64

your heaping up of Interrogatories and your pressing of Ligaveritis vos and telling me what I never knew that Solvere and Ligare be Actives yet in this part of our Power all your Activity is lost and there remains nothing for you but to report upon good evidence what you find done by your betters to your hand Half your Jurisdiction then is fallen and if I had no other Medium but this I might with good probability conclude against you for the other part For if the one half made in the same Form in the like phrase and garb of speech yet enforceth no more but Declaration and Denouncing then why should you think the other half which in likelyhood is homogeneal to the former to be more Nay there is far more natural Equity that you should be here only Declarative than in the other Politicians tell us That it is Wisdom for Princes who desire to gain the love of their Subjects to administer themselves all Favours and Graces but to leave action of Justice and Harshness to be performed by others Sir No Prince can be so ambitious of the Love of his Subjects as God is of the Love of Mankind why then should I think him so ill a Politician as to make himself the administrator of the Rough Unpleasing Love-killing Offices of Binding Shutting Retaining and then pass over to the Priest the dispensation of the Fair Well-spoken Ingratiating Offices of Remitting Loosing and Opening But I will leave this kind of Topick and Dialectical arguing because you are a pretender to convincing Reasons I will directly enter even upon that part of your power of Opening and Remitting being the other part of your Territory and by main strength take all activity from you there too Give me leave to ask you one Question you may very well favour me so far for you have asked me very many The Conversion of a Sinner is it an act of the Keys yea or no By your Principles it is not for you make the power of the Keys to be judiciary and therefore the Conversion of an Infidel pertains not to them The Church of Rome will help you with a Medium to make this Argument good Do we not judge those that are within for those that are without God shall judge saith Paul Whence she infers That a converted Infidel not yet admitted to the Church is a Stranger to the Judiciary Power of the Keys but being once admitted into the Church he is now become the Church's Subject and so fit matter for the Priest to work on upon his next Relapse What think you of this Reason Do you take it to be good Take heed or else it will give you a deadly stripe For the Conversion of an Infidel out of question is a most proper act of the Keys For since the opening of the Kingdom of Heaven is confess'd to belong unto the Keys and Heaven which was shut against the Infidel in time of his Infidelity upon his Conversion is acknowledged to be opened unto him certainly whoever converted him used the Keys or else he must pretend to have either a Pick-lock or the Herb Lunaria which they say makes Locks fall off from Doors and the Fetters from Horses heels If then the Conversion of a Sinner be an act of the Keys and by the Argument of the Church of Rome it be not judiciary it follows then That all Acts of the Keys are not Judiciary and if not Judiciary then Declarative only For betwixt these two I know no mean But because to dispute against a Man out of his own Principles which perchance are false for this oft we know falls out that by the power of Syllogisms Men may and do draw True Conclusions from False Premises because I say thus to do in the judgment of Aristotle leaves a Man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and I am willing not only to perswade you but to better you I will draw the little which remains to be said in this Point from other Places First In all the Apostles practice in Converting Jews and Gentiles find you any thing like unto the act of any Judiciary Power They neither did nor could use any such thing That they did not appears by Philip who having Catechized the Eunuch and finding him desirous of Baptism immediately upon profession of his Faith admitted him into the Church That they neither did nor could appears by Peter and the rest of the Apostles in the Acts who could never in the space of an afternoon being none but themselves have converted three thousand Souls had they taken any such way as you seem to misfancy Again imagine with your self all circumstances you can which are of force to make a power judiciary apply them all to the practice of the Apostles in the Conversion of Infidels and if you find any one of them agree to that action let me be challenged upon it and be thought to have abused you with a Fallacy To conclude then since your Ligaveritis which is the one half of your pretended Jurisdiction pretends to nothing above Declarative And since your Solveritis in so great an act as is the Conversion of Infidels lays claim to no more what act of the power of the Keys is it wherein we may conceive hope of finding any thing active or judiciary I see what you will say There yet remains a part you think wherein you have hope to speed and that is the reconciling of relapsing Christians As you fancy that in every sinning Christian there is a duty binding him to repair and lay his sin open to the Minister of the Gospel and him a power to consider of the sins of such as repair unto him to weigh particulars to consider circumstances and occasions and according to true Judgment either upon penance imposed to absolve sin which you call remitting of the sin or to with-hold him for a time from participation of holy duties with Catholick Christians which you call retaining of sins supposing that God doth the like in Heaven as it is written What you bind in Earth is bound in Heaven and what you loose in Earth is loosed in Heaven Now the Rock on which you labour to found so extravagant a Conceit is no other than the Words which I have quoted out of Scripture you press earnestly the Ligaveritis vos all which can yield you small relief for if they help you not at all in those weighty parts of the Power of the Keys which but now were laid before you by what Analogy can you expect they should afford you any assistance here As is Ligare so is Solvere as is the Conversion of an Infidel so is the reconciling of a relapsing Christian for any thing you can make appear Either all is Declarative which is very possible and in many cases necessary or all Judicative which in some cases is impossible and in none necessary so that to fit the Scripture to your Fancy you are constrained to