Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heaven_n	aaron_n	augustine_n	priesthood_n	13	3	10.2934	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A02635	A reioindre to M. Iewels replie against the sacrifice of the Masse. In which the doctrine of the answere to the .xvij. article of his Chalenge is defended, and further proued, and al that his replie conteineth against the sacrifice, is clearely confuted, and disproued. By Thomas Harding Doctor of Diuinitie.	Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572.	1567 (1567)	STC 12761; ESTC S115168	401,516	660

of Praise A Similitude a Resemblance a Likenes an Image a Remembrance a Token a Signe a Representation of a Sacrifice So Nazianzene calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Figure or Token of the Greate Mysteries To conclude S. Hierome saithe thus Hieron in Psalm 51. Tunc acceptabis Sacrificium vel cum te pro nobis offers Patri vel cum à nobis Laudes Gratiarum actiones accipis Then shalt thou receiue Sacrifice either when thou offerest thee selfe vpon thy Crosse for vs vnto thy Father or when thou receiuest of vs Praises and Thankesgeuinge Harding What this man lacketh in weight he maketh vp in nūber If a controuersie might be decided by a multitude of forged peeced maimed corrupte and impertinent sentences shuffled together this mater were fully cōcluded The Prentises the cōmon deceiued people the Ministers comen of late from their shoppes and handy craftes and others that can not iudge of these pointes thinke perhaps that he hath acquitted him selfe like a great Clerke bicause they see such a number of authorities heaped together and beholde the Margent of his booke so painted with quotations But the wise who haue skil hereof whereas among so many places alleged out of the Fathers neuer a one proueth his purpose see wel ynough that he is vtterly destitute of good mater and that he onely setteth foorth an ydle shewe of wordes The two first authorities be not founde in the places by him quoted which causeth suspicion Notwithstanding the mater is not of great importance First what if S. Augustine say as here he is made to speake The Priesthod of Aaron is now to be founde in no temple The Priesthod of Christ cōtinueth stil bothe in heauē and in the Churche but the Priesthod of Christe continueth stil in heauen If he reason thus The Priesthod of Christe continueth stil in Heauen Ergo it continueth not in the Churche I denie the Argument For it continueth both in heauen and also in the Church though otherwise there otherwise here In heauen it continueth bicause he is a Priest by nature And what dignitie he hath by nature that hath he not loste ne put of by his entring into heauē And therfore he cōtinueth a Priest there not by passible renuing of his Sacrifice but by presenting him selfe to God and by his merciful interpellation and appearing for vs before God with that body that was once sacrificed for vs Heb 9. as S. Paule saith Christe is entred into heauen for to appeare now in the sight of God for vs. Againe Heb. 7 Euermore he liueth to make sute vnto God for vs. His Priesthod continueth in the Churche that is in earth by the ministerie of men that vnder him be Priestes of the newe Testament by meane of whom as Oecumenius before allegeth saith he sacrificeth and is sacrificed Eusebius declaring the Prophecie of Christes euerlasting Priestod after the order of Melchisedek saith The euent or ende of that Prophecie is maruelous to one that considereth Euseb. de Demonst. Euāg lib. 5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 how our Sauiour Iesus Christe after the manner of Melchisedek doth by his Ministers euen to this time celebrate those thinges that apperteine to the Sacrifice which is among men And thus your false interlined glose denying Sacrifice to be done vpon an earthly Aulter which you haue impudently added by a parenthesis vnto your Doctour is controlled and confuted The second authoritie falsly quoted is this The Priest offereth vp the Sacrifice of praise not after the order of Aaron but after the order of Melchisedek What conclude you hereof Ergo he offereth not the real Sacrifice of the body and bloude of Christe The Argument is naught For he offereth vp bothe the Sacrifice of praise and also the body and bloude of Christe vnder the formes of bread and wine and therefore after the order and manner of Melchisedek This is very simple Logique If you had directed the Reader by a true quotation vnto the place where this authoritne is written you should haue sent him thither where S. Augustine maketh clearely against you And therefore of very falshod by wrong quotation you thought it policie to deceiue your Reader The testimonie is to be founde contra aduersar● legis Prophet lib. 1. cap. 20. Per Episco●porum successiones certis●ma● Where he saith thus The Churche cōtinueth from the Apostles time to our time and so foreward by most certaine successions of Bishoppes and sacrificeth vnto God in the body of Christe the Sacrifice of Praise c. For this Churche is Israel after the spirite from whom that Israel after the flesh is distincted which serued in the shadowes of Sacrifices by the which was signified THE SINGVLAR SACRIFICE that Israel after the Spirite doth now offer vp The singular Sacrifice c. Out of this Israels House God taketh not Calues neither Goates from his heardes This Israel sacrificeth vnto God the Sacrifice of Praise not after the order of Aaron but after the order of Melchisedek Yet a litle after in the same place speaketh S. Augustine more plainely of this Sacrifice They whiche reade doo knowe saith he what Melchisedek brought forth when he blessed Abraham And now they be partakers of it and they see such a Sacifice now to be offered vp vnto God in the whole world He speaketh thereof as he is woont to speake when he commeth to this Mysterie making this preface before They knowe that reade As who should say This Mysterie is not to be reueled in open writing least the despite of Infidels and Heretikes reache vnto it but the beleuers that reade the place of Genesis where it is spoken of knowe what it meaneth And they are partakers of it by receiuing the Sacrament and see such kinde of Sacrifice to be offered now through the whole Churche that now is dispersed ouer the whole worlde Beholde he speaketh of a Sacrifice that is receiued of the faithful and seene euerywhere to be offered Which argueth the same to be an external and visible Sacrifice Al these properties can not reasonably seme to perteine to a mere spiritual Sacrifice but onely to the Sacrifice of the Euchariste Thus teacheth S. Augustine there Touching the first sentence if it be true that S. Augustine saith A marke to knovv the true Churche vvhiche these Gospellers do lack● in what ranke shal we place you and your felowes M. Iewel If ye wil chalenge vnto you the name and estimation of the Churche by S. Augustines doctrine ye must shewe vs your continuance from the Apostles time to these dayes and so foreward to the ende not by a fewe wrested falsified and misconstrued places of writers seming to blame thinges that ye like not but by most certaine Successions of Bishoppes But bicause ye shal neuer be hable to shewe vs Bishops that haue succeeded one after an other in profession of your strange Doctrines from the Apostles age to this present

external Sacrifice of the Churche For the spiritual Sacrifices of our hartes exclude not the real Sacrifice of the body and bloude of Christe and the pure Aulters of our hartes may wel and do wel stande with the material Aulters of Christian Churches whereon the vnbloudy Sacrifice of Christes body and bloude are offered Hereof then and of that is before in this Diuision by you said the sclendernesse of your Argumentes doth soone appeare For thus you reason The Sacrifices of Prayers The best Argumēts that M. Ievv maketh against the Sacrifice Praises thankes geuing and other the like deuotions are of the Fathers called vnbloudy Ergo the Sacrifice of the body and bloude of Christe now offered by Priestes of the newe Testament is not called the vnbloudy Sacrifice Item By reporte of the auncient Bishop Leontius alleged in the seconde Nicen Councel Christen people in manner knowe not what an Aulter of Idolatrous Paynimes and what their Sacrifice is Ergo they knowe not what the Aulters of our Churches now nor what the dreadful Sacrifice of the body and bloude of Christe is Item The Fathers speake muche of the spiritual Aulters of our harte and of mere spiritual sacrifices Ergo they denie that there be any material Aulters and that thereon the real and external Sacrifice of Christes body and bloude is offered Logique is good cheape where these Argumentes be allowed But he that lacketh a Recorder may yet pype with an oten reede If Logique can not handsomly be applyed to mainteine M. Iewels glorious Chalenge yet Rhetorique wil do good seruice And yet in Rhetorique it selfe these Argumentes be but childish As wel might one proue there is none other heauen besides our hartes bicause S. Augustine saith August de Tempore Serm. 44 in a Sermon Corda fide lium coelum sunt The hartes of the faithful be heauen Ergo heauen that is said to be out of this worlde is but a tale As wel one might say Christe is not the Sonne of God bicause he is the sonne of man And in a mater of lesse weight as wel and by like Logique one shrewde boy might say to an other Iacke I wil proue thou hast no nose Thou hast great lolling eares Ergo thou hast no nose Of such Argumentes we haue great stoare in M. Iewels writinges and in manner none other For which cause to any graue and learned man he semeth rather worthy of contempte then of Answer Who so euer cōsidereth not the number of his wordes but the weight of his sentences not the multitude of his patched and peeced allegations but the force of the mater by the same auouched shal iudge no lesse God be thanked that heresie hath so weake a defence The .15 Diuision The Ansvver S. Augustin hath many euidēt sayinges touching this matter in his workes One shal suffice for al which is in a litle treatise he made contra Iudaeos vttered in these wordes Cap. ● Aperite oculos tandem aliquando videte ab Oriente sole vsque ad Occidentem non in vno loco vt vobis fuit constitutum sed in omni loco offerri Sacrificium Christianorum non cuilibet Deo sed ei qui ista praedixit Deo Israël Open your eies at last you Iewes and see that from the rising of the Sunne to the setting not in one place as it was appoincted to you but in euery place the Sacrifice of the Christian people is offered not to euery God but to him Malach. 1. that prophecied of these thinges before the God of Israel And euen so with that protestation which S. Augustine made to the Iewes I ende this tedious matter consistinge in manner altogeather in allegations to M. Iewel Open your eies at last M. Iewel and see how al the holy and learned Fathers that haue preached the Faithe of Christe from the rising of the Sunne to the setting haue taught this Doctrine by worde and writing lefte to the posteritie that they which vnder Christe doo vse the office of a Priest after the order of Melchisedek haue not only Authoritie but also expresse commaundement to offer vp Christe vnto his Father The proufe of which Doctrine although it depende of the weight of one place yet I haue thought good to fortifie it with some number that it may the better appeare to be a moste vndoubted Truthe not moued greatly with the blame of tediousnes where no thankes are sought but onely the defence of the Catholike Religion is intended Iewel S. Augustine as in these vvordes he neither toucheth nor signifieth this nevv manner of offeringe vp Christe vnto his Father so in sundrie other places he openeth his ovvne meaninge plainely and fully touchinge the same In his Treatie against the Ievves he vvriteth thus Sacerdotium Aaron iam nullum est in aliquo templo August ad uersus Iudaeos c. 1 At Christi Sacerdotium aeternum perseuerat in coelo The Blouddy Priesthode of Aaron is nowe in no Temple to be founde But the Priesthoode of Christe Continueth stil not vpon any Earthely Aultar But in Heauen Cont. Aduers legis proph lib. 1. ca. 1. Againe The Priest offereth vp the Sacrifice of Praise not after the Order of Aaron but after the order of Melchisedek Eius Sacrificij similitudinem celebrandam in suae Passionis Memoriam commendauit illud quod Melchisedek obtulit Deo iam per totum orbem terrarum videmus offerri Christ hath leafte vnto vs a likenes or Token of that Sacrifice in Remēbrancè of his Passion August in lib. 80. quast qu. 61. And the same that Melchisedek offered vnto God wee see is nowe offered throughout the whole VVorlde Holocausti eius Imaginem ad Memoriam Passionis suae in Ecclesia celebrandam dedit Christ hath geuen vs to celebrate in his Churche In eadem quaestione an Image or Token of that Sacrifice for the Remembrance of his Passion Huius Sacrificij Caro Sanguis ante Aduentum Christi per victimas similitudinum promittebatur Augustin cōt Faust li. 20. c. 21 De Cons. dis 2. Sacrificium August de Ciuit. Dei li. 10. c. 5. In Passione Christi per ipsam veritatem reddebatur Post Ascensionem Christi per Sacramentum Memoriae celebratur The Fleashe and Bloude of this Sacrifice before the Cumminge of Christe was promifed by Sacrifices of Resemblance The same was perfourmed in deede in the time of Christes Passion But after Christes Ascension it is frequented by a Sacramente of Remembrance Sacrificium hoc Visibile Inuisibilis Sacrificij Sacramentum id est Sacrum Signum est This Visible Sacrifice is a Sacramente Naziā in Apologet. that is to saie a Token or Signe of the Sacrifice Inuisible Quod Appellamus Sacrificium Signum est Repraesentatio Sacrificij The thinge that wee calle a Sacrifice is a Signe and Representation of a Sacrifice Thus many vvaies S. Augustine him selfe teacheth vs vvhat he meante by this vvorde Sacrifice An Oblation

Priesthod 209. a The Priesthod of Christe continueth stil both in heauen and in the Churche 235. b Internal Priesthod 241. b External Priesthod 242. a. Authoritie to create Priestes leafte to the Churche 242. b Deriuation of Priestly duetie 243. a Special Priesthod 244. b. seq Priestes Christes vicars and substitutes in making this Sacrifice 50. a. 247. a. Both Priest and people offereth and howe eche 25● a The people offer by geuing assent to the Priestes action and applying their deuotion Ibid. Real Priesthod in the Church now ergo real Sacrifice 11. b Christen men how they be Priestes in general and also kinges 12. b. Priest in english a name common to Presbyter and Sacerdos 13. a. VVhy S. Paule calleth rather Priests then Sacrificers 14. a. Priestes haue authoritie to offer vp Christe vnto his Father 49. a. 50. a. b. 90. a. b. 143. b. 144. a. 190. b. 216● a. Continuance of Priestes necessary 49. b. Priestes succede the Apostles in degree 49. b. 64. a. Iust punishment merciful 179. b R. REal presence 42. a. 72. a. 92. b. 105. b. 107. b. 111. b. 112. a. Real presence and Sacrifice auouched by S. Chrysostom dissembled by M. Ievvel 72. a Real Sacrifice 35. b. 42. a. 253. a The name of a Renegate ansvvered 182. a. VVho is a Renegate Ibid. b Reparatiō repairing or renuing and Representatiō of Christes Death 219. a. Robert King of Dednam and Robert Debnam of Elsbergholt hāged for felonie Foxes Martyrs 181. a. S SAbbatum olde and nevv 8. b. 9. a Real Sacrifice in the Churche 11. b. 105. b The substance of the Sacrifice in both Testamentes diuers 20. b The substance of bread and vvine hath no place in our Sacrifice 21. a The effectes of the Sacrifices of both Lavves diuers Ibi. b. seq Real and true Sacrifice and Sacrifice in dede 35. b The Sacrifice of the Aulter a true and real Sacrifice 36. b. 80. a. 98. b Difference betvvene a true and the true Sacrifice 40. b The Sacrifice that vve offer is the Passiō of Christ and why 41. b. Christes body neuer ceassed nor shal ceasse to be a Sacrifice 42. a The fruictes of this Sacrifice 44. b. 45. a. The Sacrifice of Christe auouched in the Gospel by S. Augustines iudgement 45. b Sacrifice spred ouer the vvorlde Ibi. In the Sacrifice of the Aulter al the conditions of Malachies prophecie are founde 51. a Sacrifices common to both Testamentes 51. a The Sacrifice of the Aulter succede al the Sacrifices of the olde Lavv. 51. b. The properties attributed to this Sacrifice by Malachie 63. a Sacrifice auouched by S. Chrysostome 72. b. 78. b. 105. b. 114. b. 119. b. 189. a. 192. a. 214. b. 226. b. The Sacrifice of the Supper and the Sacrifice of the Crosse one and diuers in diuers respectes 74. a. 78. b. This Sacrifice auouched by the Nic●n Councel 217. a. Hovv Christe sacrificeth 221. b Ten kindes of Sacrifices 226. b Three Sacrifices noted by S. Augustine 237. b Sacrifices of tvvo sortes invvarde and outvvard 239. b This Sacrifice is external 241. a Sacrifice taken tvvo vvaies 74. a This Sacrifice called Spiritual and vvhy 79. a Three kinds of Sacrifices of the new Testament by Eusebius 93. a A memorie of the Sacrifice of the Crosse excludeth not the Sacrifice of the Aulter 98. a Reasons for this Sacrifice 108. a. 137. b. 190. b. This Sacrifice is a meane to deriue the effect of Christes Death vnto vs. 121. a. This Sacrifice called the tradition of God 131. b. sequent VVhy the Fathers spake at the beginning secretly of this Sacrifice 132. b. And in the Preface 33. a In what sense the Sacrifice is Symbolical or Figuratiue 135. a S. Dionyse for the Sacrifice 137. a S. Gregorie Nazianzene for the external Sacrifice 138. a The Sacrifice of the Aulter the Sacrifice of Praise 145. a The Singular Sacrifice 145. a. 236. b. 237. a Our Sacrifice is the pure Sacrifice and why 151. a S. Cyprian euident for the Sacrifice 156. a The Sacrifice after Melchisedeks order both on the Crosse and also at the Supper 157. b A plaine argument for the Sacrifice out of S. Chrysostō 190. b. seq The ende of Christes Sacrifice and of ours 192. b Yf Christ leaft no real Sacrifice to his people the new Law was left in worse case then the olde c. 104. b. 105. a Our Sacrifice a much more maruelous and honorable sacrifice then al other 105. b The substance of the Sacrifice on the Crosse and Sacrifice on the Aulter al one 113. b The Sacrifice why of Malachie called the pure Sacrifice 151. a The Sacrifice of Prayse how general it is 144. b Sacrifice Priesthod Law go so together that the bettering of either of them doth infer the bettering of the other 197. a The differēce of Christ being in the Sacrament and in the reading of the storie of the Gospel 199. a The Sacrifice not to be consecrate but only by the Special Priestes 245. b. seq 248. a. In this Sacrifice what is Christe what are we 247. a This Sacrifice both Commemoratiue and real 253. a In this Sacrifice the Churche is offred 257. a Spiritual Sacrifice as a contrite hart and such like not the proper Sacrifice of the new testamēt 140. b Sacerdotes that is Sacrificers be now properly in the Churche 13. b The terme Sacerdos Priest vsed of the Fathers and how 7. a. seq 11. b. The olde terme Sacrificer vsed after the destruction of Ierusalem 14. a. The terme Sacrificer vsed by S. Dionyse 15. a. VVhy S. Paule calleth the publike persones of the Churche Priestes rather then sacrificers 14. a Sacrament and Mysterie do not importe a signification of absence of the thing reported to be sacrificed c. but the secret māner of sacrificing c. 77. b. VVhy the Sacrament is geuen vs in forme of bread and wine 82. b. 83 a. The Sacrament called by the name of bread and vvine 85. b The Sacramentaries Argument It is a signe of the bodie ergo not Christes true bodie stark naught 83. b. The true and real bloude of Christe in the Sacrament 107. a Sacrament of Remembrance 239. a If al be taken away that hath no proufe of Scripture what inconuenience vvil folovve 4. b. A Shifte of the newe Gospellers against the Fathers testimonies for the Sacrifice 8. a. 218. a Sicuti as in the Canō reporteth not equalitie but likenes 124. b. 258. b Signes of two sortes significatiue onely and exhibitiue 83. b. A Syster woman vvhat it meaneth in S. Paule 166. b. seq Spiridion made bishop after he had ben married 171. b Spiridion not proued by Sozomenus to be a married Bishop 172. a. Spiritual Sacrifices Spiritual Priesthod 250. a. The reproche of Straggling alone answered 67. a. sequent T. TAble 225. b. 230. a Temple 9. b Thinges signifying and thinges signified called by the same names and hovv 111. b. 112. a. b Thinges implied though not vttered in expresse Termes 66. b. Thraso his parte played by the Chalenger rather then by the defender 261. b. The olde translation of the testament not controlled by Catholikes 70. a Translatours of the Bible into English false harlots 167. b Tertullian no martyr 172. b How the Churche speaketh vvith al tongues 200. b Transsubstantiation 29. a. b. 33. a. 84● b. 92● b. 112. a. 136. a. ●ne Truth put away by an other truth M. Iewels common custome 16. b. 17. b. 26. b. 27. b. 32. b. 59. a. 98. b. 165. a. 195. a. 198. b. 202 b. 223. a. 227. b. 233 a. 239. b. Truth not excluded by Image 161. a V. VNbloudy Sacrifice 37. a. b. 41. a. 52. a. 77. a. b. 78. a. 102. a. 214. a. b. 227. a. b. Vnbloudy shedding of bloude 76. b 77. a. b. Vnblouddy Death 16● b. Vnbloudy spoken of the Sacrifice of the Aulter 247. b Christe offered his ovvne body vnblouddily 215. b Blouddy and vnblouddy referred to one subiecte 226. a. Vntruthes vttered by M. Ievvel three at once 20. b. 113. a. 147. a. An impudent vntruth and lye that can not be excused 30. a● 34. b. 171. a. 177. a. Vse and obseruation of of Sabbatum Pascha Altare c. double olde and nevve 8. b. 9. a W. VVHy Christ gaue his body and bloud vnder the formes of bread and vvine 30. a. VViat beheadded 183. b. VViued Apostares and their vvysedom 168. a. VViclef 242. b. VVordes vsed of the Fathers to expresse the manner of this blouddy Sacrifice 77. a. VVilliam Cowbridge Foxes Martyr 181. a VVilliam Flovver Foxes Martyr Ibid. a. Y. Yoke fellovve man 168. a. Liber iste lectus est approbatus à viris sacrae Theologiae Ang●ici Idiomatis peritissimis quibus sicut ipsi Authori M. N. Thomae Hardingo tutò credendum iudico Qu●re sine scrupulo edend●n esse existimo magnam ex hoc argumento vtilitatem spero Cunerus Petri Pastor S. Pe●●i Louanij 23. Augusts An. 1567.