Selected quad for the lemma: heart_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
heart_n	conscience_n	faith_n	unfeigned_a	2,594	5	11.1136	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A80511	The Anabaptist washt and washt, and shrunk in the washing: or, A scholasticall discussion of the much-agitated controversie concerning infant-baptism; occasiond by a publike disputation, before a great assembly of ministers, and other persons of worth, in the Church of Newport-Pagnall, betwixt Mr Gibs minister there, and the author, Rich. Carpenter, Independent. Wherin also, the author occasionally, declares his judgement concerning the Papists; and afterwards, concerning Episcopacy.	Carpenter, Richard, d. 1670?	1653 (1653)	Wing C618; Thomason E1484_1; ESTC R208758	176,188	502

to Persons either a sleep or mad if Baptism were formerly desired by them But if their will and preparation cannot be known they are not Baptized Because in those who have the flourishing use of Reason their expresse consent is required to baptism and also their preparation by Faith and Repentance otherwise grown Persons would not be reconciled to God according to their capacity and the Condition of Humane Nature agreeably to which Condition and Capacity God alwaies works And the Persons in the Argument as they have no capacity of expressing their consent and preparation because it cannot be riveted into them what Baptism is wherein they agree with Infants so have they no capacity of expressing that they doe not ponere obicem put an hinderance or obstacle to Sacramentall Grace and herein they differ from Infants who cannot put any such obstacle or hinderance And therefore except we have an outward Signe from them of their inward qualification we as being guided onely by outward Signes doe not apply to them the outward signe of a Sacrament as having morall signes of inward prevention and abuse of the Sacrament Hence on the one side though sons or daughters wanting the use of Reason may not be Baptized invitis Parentibus their Parents being unwilling yet if such being rip'ned shal expresse their consent and manifest their preparation we Baptize them notwithstanding the unwillingnesse of their Parents And on the other side we Baptize a Mad man that hath been mad from his Nativity without or against his cōsent because although he may outwardly oppose the outward Ceremony of the Sacrament yet he hath no inward opposition to the inward Grace and Effect of it Thus their Congruum is incongruum and the blind and deaf Persons in the Argument are not so deaf and blinde as the Forgers of it CHAP. LXXXII THey argue fourthly We cannot be assured of Childrens inward qualification for Baptism therefore we may not Baptize them I answer We are assured of a negative qualification in them namely that there is nothing in Children by the which according to their childish condition they are unqualified And as they cannot have a positive qualification so they need it not And in this respect we are much more assured of their qualification than of the qualification of grown Persons who though they professe the true Faith of Christ and seem faithfully to promise amendment of Life yet cannot make it plain answerably to our assurance or make certaine to us certitudine Scientiae aut Fidei by the certainty of Science or Faith that they cordially professe the one or faithfully promise the other or that the Motive of their Promise and Profession is the Love of God and not a temporall Consideration the Garb of Hypocrites comprehending all the outward postures of Godlinesse And as in grown Persons the Secrets of the Heart are known to God not to Men or Angels so there is a secret worke of Sanctification in Baptized Infants which God knoweth as omniscient and as the Author of Sanctification and Man knoweth not I will not seclude the Angels being Spirits from the sight of infused Grace either in the actuall infusion or in the residence of the sanctifying Habit upon whose royall knowledge of Spirituall Things in themselves we may not wish or think to intrude That the Pancrasie of this Answer may farther exert it selfe to view Let the Anabaptists consider first the Nature of divine Faith which is A firm Adhesion of the Understanding to the revealed will of God which Adhesion is commanded by our Wils acting by Love the will of God Which Faith and Love are the Gift of God For an impera●t Act of the will concurs with the Understanding to an Act of Faith And as Biel scholastically Biel in 3. Sent. d. 23. q. 2. a●l 1. Cre●ere est Actus Intellectûs Vero assentientis productus ex voluntatis Imperio An Act of Beliefe is an Act of the Understanding assenting to Truth and produced by the command of the Will Let them ponder secondly that this actuall Faith is connexed with 1 Tim 1. 5. Text. Grae● actuall Charity which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Charity ●ut of a pure Heart and of a good Conscience and of Faith unfeigned or unhypocriticall Thirdly let them advisedly recount that the Catechumeni comming to make the Profession of their Faith before Bapiism must come obediently to the Exhortation of the Apostle Let us draw neer with a Heb. 10. 22. true Heart in full assurance of Faith or as the Originall speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Text. Graec. in the fullnesse or certaine perswasion of Faith Now if the Anabaptists require assurance in the Baptizers the Baptizers must be assured that the Persons whom they Baptize are thus qualified of the which they cannot be assured but by divine Revelation And we are all already assured without a new Light of divine Revelation that these extraordinary Matters are not the ordinary Matter of Divine Revelation CHAP. LXXXIII THey argue fiftly De Baptism● non repetend● in sacris Tabulis nihil occurrit We are not prohibited in Scripture to it●ra●e Baptism therefore we may be rebaptized I answer Neither is the iterating of Baptism in a Person Baptized with Christ's Baptism commanded commended or tolerated in Scripture the Answer being as full and Scripture-strong as the Argument The Rabbins anxiously dispute upon Rabbini in Gen. 4. Gen. 4. 15. the Text and the Lord set a Marke upon Cain lest any finding him should kill him What Signe or Mark this was wherewith Cain was mark'd or sign'd Some think it to have been a woundrous and unnaturall howling yelling by the which he did bewaile his lost wandering condition Others imagine that it was a wildnesse or Fury Others a wandring Flight Others a perpetuall shaking and Trembling of his body and especially of his Head signifying his continuall Instability and horrible Fears and that therefore he built a City for his Defence he having in his Fears and wandrings dilucida Intervalla the first and this opinion being anchour'd upon the Septuagint where Sept. Gen. 4. 12. for a fugitive and a vagabond they allow 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mourning and trembling Some give abroad that he crept on all four as Children sometimes doe Some that he was bra●ded cauteriz'd with a particular Mark So Aben Ezra Yea R. Solomon Aben Ezra in Gen. 4. R. Solomon ibid. avoucheth that God imprinted a Mark in his Forehead And intruth some Arabick Versions of the Septuagint translate it And the Lord imprinted The Hebrew Word Oth signifieth also a Letter and we may without injury to the Text interpret it And the Lord set a letter upon Cain Which Letter some Hebrew Doctors wisely surmize to be Thau being the last Letter of the Hebrew Alphabet and the first of the Hebrew Word Teshuba signifying Repentance that all people seeing Cain might be silently admonished to Repent of their sins lest