Selected quad for the lemma: heart_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A86320
|
An antidote against antinomianisme. The first dosis. The unjustifiablenesse of justification before faith. Prescribed and administred in a soft answer: I. To seven arguments. II. To the solutions of five objections. III. To the novell distinction of Gods reconciliation to man, without mans reconciliation to God. Penned plainly, for the undeceiving of the plain-hearted Christian; and mildely, for the regaining of our mistaken brother H.D. By D.H.
|
D. H.
|
1643
(1643)
|
Wing H18; Thomason E42_23; ESTC P1317; ESTC R11942
|
43,691
|
47
|
hath Christs death and resurrection and intercession and strengthening in tribulations accompanying it Argument IV. THey that have their sins taken away are iustified a But the elect have their sins taken away before they believe Ergo the elect are iustified before they believe The maior is proved Blessed is the man whose iniquity is forgteen and whose sinne is covered Rom. 4.7 The minor That the Elect have their sins taken away before they believe b is proved Joh. 1.29 Behold the Lambe of God that takes away the sins of the world and Esay 35. ◠The Lord hath laid on him the iniquities of us all and 1 Pet. 2.24 Himselfe bare our sins in his own body on the Tree and Rom. 6.6 Our old man is crucified with him that the body of sinne might be destroyed Did Christ take away sinne or not Did he beare them Did he destroy the body of sinne If you say c No how will you escape the Sword of the Spirit If you say Yea I desire no more An Answer to Argument IV. YOu say a they that have their sins taken away are iustified you prove it Rom. 4.7 Blessed is the man whose iniquity is forgiven and whose sin is covered By this you intend to prove a man is iustified before he believes But your own expressions and allegations are against that 1. Expression For sins are not taken away which is a Physicall act by Gods meere mentall thoughts of iustifying but when he pronounceth the blessing of justification he saith withall in whose heart is no guile Psal 32.1 2. which is the place the Apostle quotes Rom. 4. See reall actuall iustification take our sinnes from us and our hearts from our sins 2. Allegation And with the same breath almost with which the Apostle saith Blessed is the man whose iniquity is forgiven he saith also To him that beleeveth on him that iustifieth the ungodly is his faith counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6 7. You go about to prove that the elects sins are taken away before they believe b by that Isa 53.8 1 Pet. 2.24 Eph. 1.29 What do you intend by these generall places would you by the two first places have it that Christ takes away the sins of all the Jewes contrary to Rom. 11.7 c. or by the third place that Christ takes away the sins of the whole world contrary to Rom. 8.30 yet either you must take them in that false generall sense or else they make nothing to prove justification before faith That place you alledge out of Rom. 6.6 is flat against you For if sinne be not destroyed till crucified then not till mortified For crucifying signifies mortifieation which is a part of sanctification Gal. 5.22 23 24. And the body of sinne signifies not the guilt but the filth and power Rom. 7. And therefore this place supposeth justification by faith even as faith is mentioned to precede that crucifying in the place last alledged Yet in the close you seeme to triumph c as if you had sheerly carried away the gerland upon the hornes of an unanswerable Dilemma Saying if we say Christ did take away sinne did bear them did destroy the body of sin you desire no more Thus you We answer Christ doth take away sinne doth bear the sins of men but for whom onely for the elect And when doth he take away sinne and make his bearing to lighten men Even when comes that justification by faith that as you say brings with it a crucifying of the body of sinne when comes that iustification mentioned Rom. 5.1 2 3 4. Argument V. VVE were made sinners in the first Adam before we had done good or evill a Therefore we are made righteous in the second Adam before we have done good or evill This consequence is proved Rom. 5.18 19. As by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation even so by the righteousnesse of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life for as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous If you shall place the Emphasis of this Text in All and many you will cause the hearts of the * universall Gratians to leape for joy which I beleeve you would not willingly do Therefore you must be forced to place the Emphasis in As and So As we sinned all in the loynes of the first Adam So were we all made righteous in the loynes of the second Adam The Lord Christ And this agreeth with the ministerie of Reconciliation b to wit that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe not imputing their trespasses unto them 2 Cor. 5.19 Truly this Argument was of so great force c that it did wring out of Cardinall Bellarmine this confession as the Apostle teacheth Rom. 5. That Christ may be put on without a proper act of our soule I confesse I differ from the Cardinall in his meanes of putting on Christ yet this his confession I acknowledge to be true An Answer to Argument V. IT is plaine by the place you alledge Rom. 5. c That you meane not a making of us sinners in the first Adam by Gods bare decree accounting us so And if you do not so meane but meane that we are actually accounted sinners in the first Adam since we came from his loines before we had done good or evill I admire how you dare affirme a thing so contrary to Scripture For the Apostle most evidently affirmeth in that Rom. 5. That though all that are come of Adam have not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression ver 14. that is have not sinned actually in their particular persons as infants not any sinne nor any men that particular sinne of Adam yet ver 12. it is said expressy that death passed over all men for that all have sinned or the Greeke will beare it In whom all have sinned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The former part of the verse favours this reading in these words As by one man sinne entred into the world Then concludes all have sinned Which how can it be true of infants in their conception as Psal 51. unlesse they be said to sinne in Adam But however we read the same conclusion will necessarily follow that all children and all in the wombe even Jacob and Esau have sinned originally in the common nature at first existing in that publike father of mankinde I say originally As true as we have our bodies from our Grandfathers so from the first Adam we had all the same corrupt senses and appetite in him though actually in our own persons we sinned not that sinne nor do infants as Jacob and Esau actually sinne as persons of ripe years when as the Law speakes they are capaces doli can do evill and give a seeming reason for it So then in briefe our answer is That Adams sin is imputed to all because
three places fore-mentioned with that which we find 2 Cor. 5.20 In the former places the Apostle told us we were reconciled and in this place he beseecheth us to be reconciled So you If you mistook your selfe and intended to make the parallel between the 18. verse of 2 Cor. 5. God hath reconciled us to himselfe and verse 20. We pray you in Christs stead to be reconciled Meaning herein that the same Corinthians were reconciled and were yet to be reconciled Know that in that 18. verse the Apostle speakes of his and his fellow Ministers reconciliation verse 19. of the reconciliation of others in the world And therefore ver 20. intreats and beseecheth the Corinthians that were not yet converted to be reconciled For as for the other they were Saints and a Church of God Chap. 1.1 and therefore actually reconciled 2. Answ If our first reconciliation be originall that is hath a beginning like as originall sinne then our first reconciliation is not before the foundation of the world much lesse our second which you call actuall And whereas in your first part or Sermon you mention another reconorliation before both these namely Gods reconciliation of himselfe to us we ask you what shall be the obiect of this reconciliation seeing that our nature and persons are not say you reconciled but by the other two namely by that originall and actuall reconciliation 3. By bringing both ends of your Book together we perceive that the whole frame of your mouldring foundation is this 1. God is reconciled to man Serm. 1. Page 2. And this containes such a love as Christ never purchased Page 21. Yea that God was never an enemy page 2.2 There is reconciliarton of us to God and this is two-fold 1. Originall of our natures 2 Serm. Page 2. And of this you lay down this Proposition That we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son without any previous conditions in us page 3. Here you admit Christs sufferings but Christs grace and spirit of faith is excluded 2. Actuall Reconciliation of our persons page 2. And of this you lay downe this position page 5. of your 2. Part or Sermon Mans actuall reconciliation say you to God requireth previous conditions and qualifications to be wrought in man by the Spirit of God before man can be actually reconciled to God or Gods reconciliation manifested unto him For there are say you three sorts of conditions 1 Antecedent 1 Knowledge of sin 2 Knowledge of the depth of misery by sin to such 2 Present 1 Without believing the soule remaining in the body cannot bee reconciled to God John 3.36 That by believing the soule is actually reconciled to God Iohn 3.33 John 1.12 Rom. 5.1 Thus you Your third sort of conditions are rather effects than conditions therefore I mention them not Thus brother after you have filled the bellies of your auditory with crudities I am loath to say poyson in your after service or second course you bring somewhat that is wholsome in that one dish of actuall reconciliation All the rest we must vomit up or we die To that end I goe on to administer my Dosis 1. Ans That there is but one only reconciliation namely that of God and man into atonement by faith in the one only Mediator Jesus Christ We proved afore * On page 2 of 1. Sermon that the Scripture would yeeld you this one only not two much lesse will it now allow you three one being enough and therefore one onely held out to us in the word whereof we have said so much already that we shall add the lesse now 1. The quarrell between God and us is but one namely our fall in Adam and continuance in that condition Rom. 5. it 's the businesse of the Chapter 2. The satisfaction is only one and made at once Rom 6.10 In that Christ dyed he dyed unto sinne ONCE Likewise reckon yee also your selves dead to sin but alive to God Hebr. 7.27 Christ needeth not dayly to offer up sacrifice for this he did ONCE Heb. 9.12 Christ by his owne bloud entred in ONCE into the holy place having obtained eternall redemption for us mark that clause Heb. 9.26 But now ONCE in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himselfe And ver 28. Christ was ONCE offered to beare the sins of many and unto them that look for him he shall appear the second time without sin unto salvation 1 Pet. 3.18 Christ hath ONCE suffered for sins the just for the unjust that be might bring us to God And so in the fourth of Ephesians the Apostle much runs upon one That as every Christian hath but one God the Father and one Lord Jesus Christ and one and the same holy Spirit so every one hath one calling one hope one faith and one Baptisme as a seale of those Out of all we conclude that if Christ did not at once make a full reconciliation for all that shall bee found in him then is he an insufficient Saviour If he did make a full and sufficient satisfaction whereof they have benefit by the individuall act of justification Rom. 5.1 then is he fully within the atonement in an instant 2. Answ Reconciliation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is the Ecclesiasticall Church polity No members of a Church Ismael in the Church circumcised His posteritie out of the Church not circumcised and non-reconciliation are immediate contraries therefore either a man is wholly reconciled or nothing reconciled This immediate contrariety the Apostle toucheth and intimateth 2 Cor. 6.14 where the Apostle makes the opposition between believers and unbelievers to be as between righteousnes and unrighteousnes light and darknes Christ and Belial And the Apostle toucheth our conclusion or inference that a man is either wholly irreconciled or reconciled Eph. 2.11 12 13 14 15 16. Remember that ye in time passed were Gentiles in the flesh who were called uncircumcision c. that at that time yee were without Christ being aliens from the common-vvealth of Israel or rather * Politie of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise having no hope vvithout God in the vvorld But now in Christ Jesus ye vvho sometimes vvere far off are made nigh by the bloud of Christ For hee is our peace vvho hath made both one and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us having abolished the enmity even the Law of Commandements contained in ordinances for to make in himself of twain one new man so making peace and that hee might reconcile both unto God in one body by the crosse O golden place to our purpose Read it and read it and weigh it and read it See 1. the Apostle sets down once and again a time in this life wherein they were not reconciled 2. Saith that the they were afar off 3. That as they were without hope so without Christ as without Christ so without God God and they were not reconciled And 4. That the bloud of Christ the cresse of Christ by the preaching of peace verse 17. had made believers verse 8. Jewes and Gentiles one among themselves and both one with God at Peace I know not what can be plainer to convince that we are either altogether at peace God with us and us with God or else not at peace at all 3. Answ I remember it was the maine argument of the Orthodox against the Arminians that if we might fall totally as the Arminians said from grace and yet not finally that they should produce the evidences of Scriptures set downe of one totally fallen and not finally If the Scripture set down none but of those that were totally off or finally on then the Arminian truth was not sound So may wee argue that the Scriptures set down no discoveries of one halfe reconciled or two parts reconciled and not the third for you make three reconciliations one after another but set down a demonstration to know whether we are wholy unreconciled or wholy not And therefore either we are wholly reconciled or wholly not for the time till Christ comes and makes the change This demonstration set down in the Scripture is onely from the act of actuall iustification by faith in Christ Rom. 5.1 By this we are blessed or else not blessed Rom. 4.6 Faith makes that there is no difference between us and others in state of salvation or else there remains the difference that we are not in state of salvation for the time till God comes and alters the case through faith This is evident Acts 15.9.11 And put no difference between us and them purifying * There is a purity by faith as well as of imputation of sanctification Rom. 4.3 their hearts by faith But wee believe that through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved even as they The Postscript MUch more might bee said but I have been much larger than I intended though I had two severall printed Tracts to answer the materiall mistakes whereof we have discussed not letting one as I know of escape I wish it had been undertaken by a fitter man and to such a one I had left it but that I saw most of the able men so busie and the meane while some of my neere friends to begin to bee taken with these mistakes I have answered with as much judgement as I could in so verie a short time as I had allotted for this businesse still carrying with me a render conscience the Lord knowes I lye not that I nught not in the least grain or jota prejudice or cloud the free grace of God in Jesus Christ which is more precious to me than my life and the onely bridge that must carry me over the eternall Lake to heaven I have also used as much modesty and love in all my expressions as I could I appeale to the would for the truth of this that I might not grieve any but guide them If any apprehend any materiall mistakes let them but with divine reason cleere them unto me and I will print my retraction Or if they will needs print a confutation let them but doe by me as I have done by this for the manner and keep to the Scriptures for matter and I will say well done Farewell FINIS