Selected quad for the lemma: head_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
head_n	church_n	member_n	mystical_a	3,558	5	10.4248	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A73031	Certain godly and learned sermons, preached by that worthy seruant of Christ M. Ed. Philips in S. Sauiors in Southwarke: vpon the whole foure first chapters of Matthew, Luc. 11. vers. 24. 25. 26. Rom. 8. the whole, 1. Thess. 5. 19. Tit. 2. 11. 12. Iames 2. from the 20. to the 26. and 1. Ioh. 3. 9. 10. And were taken by the pen of H. Yeluerton of Grayes Inne Gentleman	Philips, Edward.; Yelverton, Henry, Sir, 1566-1629.	1607 (1607)	STC 19854; ESTC S114640	484,245	625

faith were spiritually conioined to Christ who is the Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world and they were not saued by their regeneration and workes of faith for these were but effects of their first vniting to Christ spiritually which speech of our coniunction with Christ is like that of the true Catholike Church who are said to bee members of another though they be seuerall persons in respect of the mysticall reference which they haue to Christ their head Further they obiect Rom. 5.19 As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous Whereupon they inferre that it must be proportionable euery way and that as corruption is naturally deriued from Adam to vs and his very corruption really abideth in vs so Christ must really deriue his righteousnesse from himselfe to vs or else say they the example holdeth not To this we say as in Adam we are truely sinners by his sinne and that not by imitation but by imputation for that one sinne of Adam which condemned all the world was onely committed in the person of Adam so the iustice of Christ is no more in vs then was that sinne onely of Adam which made vs all to be damned and the punishment of that sinne brought originall sinne and the generall corruption And say they though all are saued through the obedience of Christ yet as after the sinne of Adam originall sinne was deriued to vs so must Christ his righteousnesse needes be in vs. We answer true it is they agree in this Adam giueth vs that be hath by the participation of his flesh Christ giueth vs that he hath onely by the communication of the holy Ghost Againe we say as euery man dieth of his owne disease and yet it may be he had that contagion from another so for Adams sin as it was imputed vnto vs we die and yet not for Adams sinne aloue but for our owne for in vs there is the very matter of corruption but Christs righteousnesse is not in the flesh but in the spirit for though we may haue perfect sinne yet we cannot haue perfect righteousnesse Againe there be three degrees in Adams sinne first by imputation secondly by propagation and drawing the filthinesse of Adams sinne really into the soule and flesh of man Thirdly we are condemned iustly by the imitation of Adams sinne in as much as when we come to discretion we sinne as Adam did but rigteousnesse is spirituall and hath but one degree onely by imputation and not by imitation for who would goe to hell to suffer as Christ did And yet there is somewhat in Christ not imputed to vs but deriued to vs yet no matter to iustifie vs that is the sanctification of his nature which is the renewing of ours and this holinesse we must haue actually in vs but all this is after our conuersion wrought meerely in the obedience of Christ his blood IAMES chap. 2. vers 25.26 verse 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot iustified through works when she had receiued the messengers and sent them out another way verse 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead euen so faith without workes is dead VNto the example of Abraham the Apostle matcheth this of Rahab to shew how by this excellent worke she did proue her selfe a conuert Israelite from a cursed Cananite wherein first is questionable why the holy Ghost should vouchsafe to sort Abraham that most reuerend father of the faithfull and of the Patriarkes with a woman who was for her condition base because a victualler for her country cursed because a Cananite for her conuersation infamous because a strumpet and leaue other excellent examples of worthy men which might seeme to haue beene a lesse disparagement to Abraham whereto is answered that there is a speciall cause why saint Iames setteth this example downe aboue the rest because to the example of Abraham it might haue been replied that he was a singular and rare man so 〈◊〉 might be compared with him none did euer exceed him and many were inferiour to him and yet haue beene saued and therfore that the Apostle should not too much insist vpon the example of Abraham for this cause he hath chosen such a one as there is so many degrees betweene Abraham and her as if it bee aboue our reach to match Abraham yet wee may bee ashamed not to onermatch a whoore And if wee can neither imitate the highest nor bee equall with the lowest let vs boast neuer so long of good workes and faith it is certaine wee are monstrous hypocrites and cannot bee saued Secondly in this example wee must wisely consider what worthy things there are in this worke of Rahab taken out of Iosh 2.1 that it should receiue this honour to bee matched with the noble acts of the Patriarkes both by this Apostle and in Hebr. 11.31 Wherein wee must examine the lawfulnesse of her act not onely to conceale them that came as spies but to abet comfort and conuey them away since they came to espy the land which tended to the desolation of the whole countrey and subuersion of the state Which maketh nothing for them that send Emissaries and Iesuites into this our land to steale away the hearts of the people from their lawfull Soueraigne For in that Rabab did thus aide comfort and abet them shee did it not because they came to vsurpe and assault the countrey for if they had had no right but onely had come to haue made a larger extent of their Princes territories it had beene in them a fellonious purpose and as much as rouing vpon the sea and robbing by the high-way and if shee had suspected they had come to this end without hauing any better right vpon paine of her soule shee should haue discried it otherwise she had beene disloyall to her Prince and State but in that shee did conceale it shee knewshee had her security from heauen that cursed should all those bee that resisted the seed and race of Abraham she knew that by the mandate of the almighty the land was giuen vnto them and that they that dwelt therein were but vsurpers and therefore were bound to yeeld it vp as from God And if vpon this knowledge she had not protected them as 〈◊〉 did the Angels Genes 19.8 she had beene guiltie of their bloud she might haue beene vsed like Tarpeia among the Romanes who when shee had ingaged them to deliuer vp their bracelers vpon recompence of yeelding vp the Citie and Tower the fouldiers ouerwhelmed her in stead of giuing her the bracelets but all conditions made by Rahab were performed by the spies to shew that the whole worke proceeded from the Lord. Now for the letting them out by night though it bee not lawfull by the lawes of such defenced cities and places to scale the walles in the night time yet vpon the equitie of the cause and in the case of necessitie it may bee excused

their right hand whom they meane to make their equals as Gen. 41.40 Ioseph was set at the right hand of Pharaoh being made ruler ouer all Egypt and 1. King 2.19 Salosom set Bathsheba his mother on the right hand so is it said by Dauid in the Psalmes the Queene fitteth on the right hand of the King So as the meaning is Psal 45. ● that Christ Iesus hath receiued from God the copartnership of soueraigne authority ouer all natures whatsoeuer and as he is man being also the Sonne of ●●d and our elder brother is aduanced ouer all and hath received a name aboue all so as now the Father ruleth nothing but 〈◊〉 the person of his Sonne Secondly vnderstand that this sitting at Gods right hand though it was due to his humane nature and flesh from the moment of his conception and vniting the flesh to his diuine nature yet it is properly assigned to him after his resurrection or rather after his ascension For hauing in the forme of a seruant performed all obedience then did the Father crowne his obedience with this excellent glory and then was this soueraignty bestowed on him Which must teach vs much more patiently to wait vpon the Lord and not to expect our reward before we set forth or while we be running but when our race is finished and that wee haue borne the heat of the day and haue fought a good fight in the Lord. Thirdly for this his sitting that is the receiuing of his absolute authority though Christ as God neuer receiued it being equall to God much lesse after his ascension yet after his ascension he was in some sort aduanced in his diuine nature for as the Scripture saith The Sonne of God descended meaning thereby abased himselfe Rom. 10.7 and his glorie did not so fully appeare being hidden in the cloud of his infirme flesh yet as the Apostle saith by his rising and ascending was he mightily declared to be the sonne of God and by that was more manifested to be so Rom. 1.4 then he was vpon the earth This also he sheweth himselfe Iob. 17.24 when he praied to be glorified with the same glory he had with his Father from the beginnig not that it should then be bestowed vpon him but then miraculoussy declared to haue had it from eternitie Howbeit this his sitting heere spoken of is properly meant to be exalted in his flesh because this authority is giuen him as Mediator And in this respect Christ may bee said to be greater then himselfe and lesse then himselfe because his flesh is beneath his diuinity and his Godhead farre aboue his humanity And by this power giuen him he is glorified in the Godhead in the manifestation of it in the flesh by abolishing all his infirmities and replenishing his flesh with all maner of graces Colos 2.8 as it is said l●● him dwelt the fulnesse of the Godhead Concerning the second point namely what fruits come t●● vs by this his sitting at Gods right hand they are principally three first we learne by this that he doth inrich his Church generally and euery member particularly with so many graces 〈◊〉 the holy Ghost as shall be necessary to the glory of the head the edification of the whole body and the saluation of euery particular member according as it is set downe Eph. 5.26.27 that this Church might be without spot or wrinkle and without blame Secondly by this his presence with God he doth defend and protect his Church from all enemies whatsoeuer so as the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it And this is our comfort that since all power is giuen him he that hath felt our infirmities hath the tempering of the cup of our afflictions which we may boldlie drinke of and not refuse it no more then he did the bitter cup his Father gaue to him and assure our selues that no tyrants hand can touch vs further then he permits him which shall neuer be aboue our strength for Christ hath power enough to performe it and God hath will enough to doe it And since while he was in his humanity on earth the diuell could not enter into a heard of swine without his licence and permission Math. 8.32 and that as it is said in the Reu. 5.3 he doth so seale the doore as none can enter in vnles he open it what shall we thinke he will doe now being in his glory and at his Fathers elbow And while he was in the flesh being able by the word of his mouth to stay the raging of the sea Mat. 8.26 much more now can he and will he represse the rage and fury of our persecutors when it please him Thirdly he shall sit at the right hand of the father vntill all his children be fully glorified and his enemies destroied which are of two sorts first such as are to be abolished as death secondly or such as perfectly are to be vanquished and yet perpetually to be tormented as the diuel and the damned spirits for to them shall it be a day of horror and of howling Now for the fourth which is his intercession or his making request for vs consider two things first what is meant in that he is said to make petition for vs secondly what benefits redound and arise to vs by these his requests for vs. For the first that he is said to pray for vs it is the exaltation and aduancement of Christ Iesus in the office of his eternall priest-hood whereof there were two parts the one to expiate or offer sacrifice for sinne the other to pray for the people Now Christ was such a Priest as the power of his sacrifice continueth for euer and no more sacrifice is to be offered vp as it is said Heb. 10.12 this man meaning Christ after he had once offered one sacrifice for sinne sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Howbeit the second duty of his Priest-hood which is to pray for vs remaineth still but after an other maner not as he did vpon the earth when he prostrated himselfe to the ground and lifted vp his eies to heauen with trembling of heart and anguish of minde offering vp praiers as Heb. 5.7 with strong cries and teares vnto God being himselfe then but as a seruant to his Father but he exerciseth this office now not by any submission of gesture but by representing and setting before the eyes of his Father his sacrifice fresh and bleeding which turneth his Fathers countenance from our indignities and misdeeds to looke vpon himselfe as Heb. 9.24 He is entred into heauen to appeare now in the sight of God for vs standing there to be beholden For the second namely what benefits we haue by this his intercession and they are three first by this he fulfilleth all the types and figures of the law that heereby he might fully declare vnto vs that he is the euerlasting Priest prefigured by them that were vnder the law as Heb. 10.19 hee is said

Coronation for then shall we haue not Reedes but Palmes in our hands to shew our triumph and bee crowned not with Thornes but with Glory euen the glory that Christ had from the beginning Now for life that cannot doe it for there is no temptation in this life neither excessiue pleasure nor abundant profit not magnificent state that a righteous soule will not forgoe rather then forsake the righteousnesse of C●●●● or their owne peace of conscience yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Moses ●●●●her then to lose the least light of the Lords conntenance we will refuse to be made glorious by our birth and chuse to suffer affliction with the children of God Heb. 11.24 and with Paul Phil. 3.8 to esteeme all things but as the excrement of a dog in comparison of the security and confidence we haue of the Lords loue towards vs so as we are Christs in our life also And though we doe desire to see the face and glory of the Lord yet as Saint Paul speaketh whether we be in our body at home absent Phil. 1.20 or abroad in our separation our soules still wait vpon the Lord for for this cause as Rom. 14.8.9 Christ died that whether we liue or die we might be the Lords Now for Angels Powers or Principalities by the names themselues may be vnderstood as well the good Angels as the bad wherof Paul speaketh 1. Cor. 6.3 Know ye not that we shall iudge the Angels that is the reprobate spirits for these be executioners of the Lords will though not by willing and loyall obedience as well as the other and though both these being seuerall haue in the scripture the same titles giuen them as the good are called Eph. 1.21 Powers and Principalities and so are the bad called by the same name Colos 2.15 where Christ is said to spoile and to traduce Principalities Powers to open shame and Eph. 6.12 We must fight against Principalities and Powers yet in this place by Angels are to bee taken the good and by Powers and Principalities the diuels The reason is because heere the Apostle maketh an opposition betweene contraries and also because in other places of the scripture where these same words are vsed to expresse the good Angels there is alwaies more added to their stile as Eph. 1.20 Thrones and Dominations are mentioned besides the other But it may be said will the Angels that are the messengers of God attempt any such thing as to part God and vs No it is impossible howsoeuer the Apostle speaketh excessiuely from the exultation ioy of his spirit for he reasons ab impossibili as if he should say if Angels which be the most excellent and most powerfull creatures could attempt to separate vs from the loue of God yet they could not for Christ which is the head of Angels hath ioyned vs to his Father and therefore much lesse any inferiour thing can doe it After this maner this Apostle speaketh Galat. 1.8 If an Angel from heauen should preach any other doctrine which is impossible let him be accursed So Rom. 9.3 Paul wisheth himselfe accursed to redeeme the Iewes and Moses praied to be rased out of the booke of life rather than the Israelites should perish which was not possible that the decree of God should bee frustrate But such was the vehemencie of their affection if the Lord would be intreated at their praiers And it was necessary for the Apostle heere to name Angels because they be the mightiest creatures and if they cannot part the Lord and vs much lesse can diuels for the worst they can doe is but to buffet vs whereby our infirmities shall be healed and as Christ said to Peter Satan desireth to winnow thee like wheat Mat. 22.31 but I haue praied that thy faith may not faile This also appeareth by that in the Reuelation 12.4 that the red Dragon cannot doe it though with his taile hee can draw starres from heauen that is discouer the hypocrisy of some great professors for first he waited vpon the woman as she was with child secondly in her deliuerie thirdly when the child was brought foorth to see first if he could haue destroied the Church of the Iewes and if not the Church of the Gentiles and if not the head of the Church the Lord Iesus or if not the whole bodie of the faithfull or if not some one of the faithfull but he was cast downe saith the text that is he was abased in his pride and sought to aduance and lift vp himselfe againe to heauen by destroying the woman and her seede that is by withstanding the saluation of the elect This Dragon hath especially two instruments first the great Beast that is the Romane Empire where was a name of blasphemie written in his fore-head which though it could with Eliah call fire from heauen yet could it neuer consume the faith of Gods chosen 2. King 1.10 nor euer draw one soule from Christ The second is the Romane Hierarchie raised out of the ruines of the former which though it could make the heauens brasse that it should not raine or the earth iron that it should yeeld no fruit yet could it neuer touch any that was written in the booke of the Lambe Reuel 5.3 for where hee sealeth none can open and where he openeth none can shut and as it is said in the former place They which are bought from the earth sing in great troupes a new song with the Lord Iesus For the other Neither things present that may be knowen nor things to come which may seeme to be doubtfull can make any separation of God from vs for the elect are sure the Lords grace shall assist them to the end neither height of heauen as Paul that was carried vp on high did not yet presume nor the depth of hell 2. Cor. 12.5 Ionah 2.1 as Ionas being in the belly of the Whale did not yet dispaire but had his praiers passing to heauen thorow the fishes mouth Iob. 13.15 Iob in the patiēce resolution of his spirit could say O Lord though thou kill me yet will I loue thee for hope which is the sure anchor of the soule maketh vs to enter with considēce within the lists of the Lords presence and there staieth vs for the Lord doth know vs for his owne in his beloued Sonne Hence learne that a man may be assured he shall be saued for this place is without exception Yet some say this was a speciall reuelation Paul had of his owne saluation which is most iniurious to the whole text for though he saith I am perswaded as speaking of himselfe yet in the matter of the perswasion he ioyneth all the faithfull as that nothing can separate vs speaking generally of all which is proued also by many things and speeches before as verse 23. Wee grone for the redemption of our body Did Paul onely grone And verse 35. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God Was Paul only