Selected quad for the lemma: head_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
head_n	body_n	member_n	mystical_a	10,421	5	11.0632	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16573	The complaynt of veritie, made by Iohn Bradford. An exhortacion of Mathewe Rogers, vnto his children. The complaynt of Raufe Allerton and others, being prisoners in Lolers tower, & wrytten with their bloud, how god was their comforte. A songe of Caine and Abell. The saieng of maister Houper, that he wrote the night before he suffered, vppon a wall with a cole, in the newe In, at Gloceter, and his saiyng at his deathe	Bradford, John, 1510?-1555.; Rogers, Matthew. Instruction of a father to his children.; Allerton, Ralph. A lamentable complaynt of the afflicted, unto god our onely healper.; Allerton, Ralph. A briefe rehersal of parte of the aucthours trouble, entituled God is my comforte.; Allerton, Ralph. Songe of the poore prisoners in Lolers tower.; Hooper, John, d. 1555. Wordes of Maister Houper at his death.; Hooper, John, d. 1555. These are the wordes that Maister John Houper wrote on the wall with a cole, in the newe inne in Gloceter, the night before he suffered.	1559 (1559)	STC 3479; ESTC S112643	64,740	174

into a Serpent But concerning the Sacrament neyther the senses sée any other thing then bread neyther is there any mention made of turning And therefore their cauill is plainly séene to be but a cauill and of no force But to come againe to bring moe reasons against Transsubstantiation Secondly that the substance of bread remayneth still the very text doeth teach For the Euangelists and the Apostle Saint Paul doe witnesse that Christ gaue that to his disciples and called it his body which hee tooke on which hee gaue thanks and which hee brake but he tooke bread gaue thanks on bread and broke bread Ergo he gaue bread and called bread his body as he called the Cuppe the new Testament So that it followeth by this that there is no Transubstantiation And this reason I my selfe haue promised in writing to prooue by the authoritie of the Fathers namely Ireneus Tertullian Origine Ciprian Epiphanius Hieronimus Augustinus Theodorete Cirill Bede if so bee I may haue the vse of my bookes Thirdly that in the Sacrament there is no Transubstantiation of the bread by this reason I doe prooue Like as by our sauiour Christ the Spirit of trueth spake of the bread This is my body So sayth the same spirit of trueth of the same bread That wee many are one body and one bread c. So that as it appeareth the Sacrament not to bee in the Church by Transubstantiation euen so is it not Christs naturall body by Transubstantiation Fourthly I prooue that there is no Transsubstantiation by Luke and Pauls wordes spoken ouer the Cuppe For no lesse are they effectuall to Transsubstantiate the Cup then their words spoken of the bread are operatorious and mighty to Transsubstantiate the bread For as they say of the bread This is my body so say they of the Cup This Cup is the new Testament Which thing is absurde to bee spoken or thought eyther of the Cup or of the thing in the Cup by Transsubstantiation Yea rather in saying these wordes This Cup is the new Testament wee are taught by their coupling this worde Cup to the demonstratiue This how we should in these wordes This is my body knowe that this word This doeth there demonstrate bread Fiftly that the substance of bread remaineth in the Sacrament as the reasons before brought foorth do prooue so doth the definition of a Sacrament For the Fathers doe affirme it to consist of an earthly thing and of an heauenly thing of the word and of the element of sensible things and of things which bee perceiued by the minde But Trāssubstantiation taketh cleane away y e earthly thing the element the sensible thing and so maketh it no Sacrament And therefore the definition of a Sacrament full well teatheth that bread which is the earthly thing the sensible thing and the element remaineth still as saint Augustine saith The worde commeth to the element he sayth not taketh away the element and so it is made a Sacrament Sixtly the nature and propertie of a Sacrament teacheth this also which I haue affirmed For as Cyprian writeth that Sacraments beare the names of the things which they signifie so doeth saint Augustine teach that if Sacraments haue not some signification with the things where of they be Sacramentes then are they no Sacraments Now in the Lordes supper this similitude is first in nourishing y t as bread nourisheth the body so Christs body broken feedeth the soule Secondly in bringing together many into one that as in y e Sacrament many graines of Corne are made one bread many Grapes are made one lyquour and Wine so the multitude which worthily receiue the Sacrament are made one body with Christ and his Church Last of all in one vnlikely likelinesse or similitude that as bread eaten turneth into our nature so we rightly eating the Sacrament by faith turne into the nature of Christ So that it is plaine to them that wil sée that to take the substance of bread away is cleane against the nature and propertie of a Sacrament I will speake nothing how that this their doctrine of Transubstantiation beside the manifold absurdities it hath in it which to rehearse I omit it vtterly ouerthroweth the vse of the Sacrament and is cleane cōtrary to the end wherefore it was instituted so is no longer a Sacrament but an Idoll and is the cause of much Idolatrie conuerting the peoples hearts from an heauenly conuersation to an earthly and turning the Communion into a priuate action and a matter of gazing and piping of adoring and worshipping the worke of mens hands for the liuing God which dwelleth not in Temples made with mens hands much lesse lyeth he in Pixes and Chests whose true worshippe is in spirit and veritie which God graunt vs all to render vnto him continually Amen The Sacrament of Baptisme doth also teach vs that as the substance of the water remaineth there so in the Lords Supper remaineth the substance of bread after consecration For as by Baptisme we are engraffed into Christ so by the Supper we are fedde with Christ These two Sacraments the Apostle gladly coupleth together 1. Cor. 10. and 1. Cor. 12. Wee are baptized into one body sayth hee and haue drunke all of one spirit meaning it by the Cuppe as Chrysostome and other great learned men doe well interprete it As therefore in Baptisme is giuen vnto vs the holy Ghost and pardon of our sinnes which yet lie not lurking in the water so in the Lords Supper is giuen vnto vs the Communion of Christs bodie and bloud that is grace forgiuenesse of sinnes innocencie life immortalitie without any Transubstantiation or including of the same in the bread By Baptisme the old man is put off and the new man put on yea Christ is put on but without Transubstantiating the water And euen so it is in the Lords Supper Wee by fayth spiritually in our soules doe féed on Christs body broken do eate his flesh and drinke his blood doe dwell in him and he in vs but without Transsubstantiation As for the cauill they make that we are baptized into one body meaning thereby the mysticall body not the naturall body of Christ whereby they would enforce that wee are fed with the naturall body of Christ but wée are not ingraffed into it but into the mysticall body and so put away the reason aforesaid As for this cauill I say wee may soone auoyde it if so bee that we will consider how that Christ which is the head of the mysticall body is not separate from the body and therefore to be ingraffed to the mysticall body is to bée ingraffed into the naturall bodie of Christ to bée a member of his flesh and bones of his bones as Pope Leo full wel doeth witnesse in saying that Corpus regenerati fit caro crucifixi The body sayth hée of the regenerate is made the flesh of Christ crucified And