Selected quad for the lemma: head_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A41808
|
Considerations upon the second canon in the book entituled Constitutions and canons ecclesiastical, &c.
|
Grascome, Samuel, 1641-1708?
|
1693
(1693)
|
Wing G1569; ESTC R11703
|
35,734
|
45
|
But to what purpose is all this Stuff Are we to judge of our Constitutions by the blind Tale of a little Historian or the contradictory Saying of an old Moth-eaten Lawyer who wrote in diâ—â—icult Times trod upon Thorns and was under a kind of Necessity to write so as that he might avoid the Rage of the several incensed Parties What a woful Condition are the People of England in if they must look five six seven or eight hundred Years downward for what they are to do now and to learn wherein and how far they are to obey their King Such Things fall in few Hands and are read by fewer and perhaps well considered by fewest of all Will Mr. Johnson have the present State of Affairs reduâ—ed to what was so long since Or will he be content that his Almighty House of Commons should be lâ—id aside because there was no such House at the time from whence he seâ—cheth several of his Authorities or at least not such a House as is now under the prâ—sent Constitutions And therefore I must beg his Pardon if in this case I little regard his far-fetch'd Stories and am bold to tell him that we are not to be ruled or guided by odd Remnants of Antiquity in this matter but by our present Constitution and if he can make that agree with his Old Stories he will go near to carry the Cause but if he cannot then both he and all the Revolutionists will stand for ever condemned by it Now I know not how to come to the knowledg of our Constitutions better than by our Laws and then for a Protestant Kingdom it may be convenient to look so high as the first establishment of Religion under that odd Title and to compare and view the agreement of our Laws all along from the first enterance of the Protestant Religion to the very time of King James's pretended Aâ—dication And here if I go so high as Henry the 8th 〈◊〉 I think I need go no farther than Queen Elizabeth and so trace Things to our own Time we shall thence learn the present Obligations we lay under when this Revolution came upon us I am not willing to create a Quarrel whether Henry the 8th were Papist or Protestant I will freely give the Papists my share in him For he that so â—obb'd the Churches that many Parishes have not Revenues to find a Minister Bread and burnt Protestants because they would not become Papists I think is much fitter for them than for us But be he what he will I cannot find that either he or his Parliament owned Mr. Johnson's Doctrine In the â—â—th of his Reign cap. 12. you will find it thus Enacted Where by divers sundry old Authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed That this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by one â—upream Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body Politick compact of all sorts and degrees of People divided in Terms and by Names of Spirituality and Temporality been boundâ—n and owen to bear next to God a natural and humble Obedience Here a Parliament declares him 〈◊〉 subjects him to none but God and in the next following Words gives him plenary whole and intire Power Pre-eminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction And this they declare to be no new thing but to be taught by old Histories and Chronicles whose authentickness they vouch Now one would think that such authentick Histories and such Vouchers should make a better Authority thâ—n Mr. Johnson's Knighton But it is so well known what Authority Henry the 8th challenged and was owned by his Subjects that I need not insisâ—â—pon it Had our Author come abroad then with his new Inventions he himself perhaps would have found little better usage than Dr. Burnet's Pastoral Letter As for King Edward the Sixth we do not find that he any ways departed from the Authority his Father left him but though a Prince of great Hopes and pious Inclinations yet by the Seducements of some ill Persons about him entered farther upon the Ecclesiastical Authority than ever his Father did how justly I leave others to judge I cannot commend it And then for Queen Mary all Dignities Prerogative Royal Power Pre-eminence Priviledges Authorities and Jurisdictions are as fully wholly absolutely and entirely invested in her as in her Father or any her Predecessors by the Statute 1 Mariae Par. Sec. Cap. 1. To avoid tediousness I shall only touch upon such Statutes as speak home to this purpose and now we come to that which all sorts of Persons except Papists as with one Month stile the best Reign I mean the admired times of Queen Elizabeth in the first Year of whose Reign the Oath of Supremacy was enacted or rather revived in which amongst others are these two things asserted 1st That the Queen's Highness is the only Supream Governour of this Realm and of all other her Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal 2dly That no Foreign Prince Person I relate State or Potentate hath or â—ught to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm By the first her own Subject's Hands are tied up by the second the Usurpations of Foreignes are excluded She could not be Supream much less only Supream if any Men or body of Men in her own Dominions had a Superior Power to depose her and it being not only their Duty but they also farther obliged by Oath to assist and desend her in this Supremacy and this Oath and Statute being transmitted in force to all her Successors any attempt by them to the contrary must necessarily be invalid and unlawsul And those who have a mind to know the Penalties which the Law insticts on Offenders in this kind may at their leisure read them in the same Statute Let us now desâ—â—â—d from the Reign of Queen Elizabeth to that of King James the First and in the Act of Recâ—grâ—tion Anno 1. Jac. 1. cap. 1. after a long dutiful and humble Prâ—â—mble it is thus said We being bounden thereunto both by the Laws of God and Man do recognize and acknowledg and thereby express our unspeakable Joys That immediately upon the Dissolution and Decease of Elizabeth late Queen of England the Imperial Crown of the Realm of England and of all the Kingdoms Dominions and Rights belonging to the same did by inherent Birth-right and lawful and undoubted Succession descend and come to your most excellent Majesty as being lineally justly and lawfully next and sole Heir of the Blood-Royal of this Realm as is aforesaid And that by the Goodness of God Almighty and lawful Right of Descent under one Imperial Crown your Majesty is of the Realms and Kingdoms of England Scotland France and Ireland the most potent and mighty King and by God's
a one cannot be accepted or if it be his Institution is void They may chew the Cud upon this who have accepted any Preferments under these Schismatical Bishops for the obtaining of which they have taken Oaths whereby they denied their lawful King and consequently then incurred an Excommunication ipso facto 3. It makes the whole Administration of his Ministerial Office ineffectual You can expect no Return of Prayers made with him with whom you ought not to communicate the B. Sacrament consers no Benesit received from his Hands he cannot authoritatively bless the People of God who is himself under a Curse and excluded from being a part of them And here I think all those who have joined themselves to such Persons to be highly concerned to lay their Hands on their Hearts and consider well what they have done in communicating with them hitherto and whether they can think it safe to continue therein for in communicating with them as they are Schismaticks they make themselves Schismaticks and in communicating with them as they are Excommunicates not only all their Labour is lost but they get a Curse instead of a Blessing The matter were not altogether so bad if this Censure extended only to Clergy-men but that a thorough Provision might be made to secure the Subject in Obedience it spares none and therefore I shall consider how Excommunication affects Persons in general whether Lay-men or Clergy-men 1st Then no excommunicated Person ought to be sussered to be present at the Service of the Church and if the Minister who officiates can no other ways get rid of him he ought rather to break off and desist than to susser such a Person to join in Communion with his Flock 'T is indeed true that he may be allowed to be present when the Sermon is made as supposed to make for his Information or Conviction but even then he ought not to be intermingled with others but to stand alone and plainly distinguished from the rest of the Congregation But to the Prayers such Persons never were nor ought to be admitted 2dly Every excommunicated Person is especially debarred from being a Partaker of the Lord's Supper and antiently if any Priest did administer the Sacrament to such an one bâ—â—ore he was Canonically reconciled to the Church which originally was done by the Bishop or by Authority deputed from him he himself became liable to be deposed and no longer intrusted in the Ministry 3dly Whosoâ—ver stands excommunicated non â—rrante clave he is dismembred and cut off from the Church and consequently deprived of those Supplies and Succours which the Mâ—â—bers receive by being united together in one Body and by means thereof to Christ their Head they are like Branches cut off from the Vine there is no way or means left whereby any gratious Succours can be conveyed unto them unless there be a Reinsition and they be received and grafted in again 4ly Every excommunicate Person is under a heavy Curse the Devil has a peculiar Power over him so that his Condition is very deplorable and desperate whilsâ— he remains under that Sentence Hence the Scripture styles it a delivering unto Satan 1 Cor. 5. 5. and 1 Tim. 1. 20. and Tertullian calls it summum futuri Judicii Praejudicium the highest Presumption of what shall be his Sentence in the day of Judgment God will ratiâ—ie in Heaven the Sentence of his Church on Earth when she proceeds against Offenders in vindication of his Laws and Ordinances That Saying of our Saviour to his Apostles is enough to strike any Man with Horrour who justly incurrs the Censure of the Officers of the Church Verily I say unto you whatsoever ye shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven Mat. 18. 18. 5ly An excommunicated Person is or ought to be debarred from most of the Benesits and Comforts of civil Conversation he is like a blown Dear every one in the Herd even for his own Safety will push him from him or like a Man that has the Plague every one that would escape the Infection avoids him But of this more presently in its due place The State and Condition of a Person under the Sentence of Excommunication being thus briefly explain'd I think it may be sufficiently dreadful to any who have any sense of Christianity or apprehensions of the Wrath of God and if this be the state of the Revolutionists they have no great cause to brag of their Bargain and if others did carry themselves towards them as they ought to do towards Men in such a State I am apt to think they would quickly hang their Heads and if their Hearts were not as hardened as Pharaoh's very Shame would work in them remorse and bring them to Repentance But tho' I have little hopes of this both Priests and People being so generally infected yet to discharge my own part I shall proceed in my Method before propounded and shall now examine what ought to be the Behaviour and Carriage of other persons towards a person that is under Excommunication and 1. All persons ought to stand upon their Guard against him and not onely keep him from the publick Service and drive him out of their Churches as a Profaner of their Communion and one who has no Right to it and as one who is infectious and injurious to them and makes their Communion ineffectual but farther they ought to take care that they join not in any private Devotions with him nor admit him to Prayers with them tho' in their own Houses I do not say but they may pray for instruct admonish and endeavour what they can to reclaim such a one but they must not pray with him nor join in any other Act of Christian Communion with him Procul ite profani was proclaimed at the Celebration of the Heathen Mysteries and do not the Christian Mysteries deserve much more Reverence and Awâ— Ought we not as nigh as we can to have a care that we admit none of his Enemies none that have notoriously provoked him and not attoned their Crime when we perform those Acts and Offices wherein we have Access to and Communion with the great God of Heaven and Earth I confess that particular Persons ought not to take upon them by their own Authority to exclude any from Communion but iâ— they know any person to be guilty of a notorious Crime or live in a scandalous Way they ought to complain to proper Judges but when the Church has pass'd her Consure upon them they have a kind of Cain's Brand and are marked out for all Men to avoid it is our B. Saviour's own Direction to us concerning every such person that he be unto us as a Heathen Man and a Publican Mat. 18. 17. and such tho' they had been Emperours the primitive Christians were so far from admitting to their Communion that they would not so much as allow them to be bare Spectators not