Selected quad for the lemma: hand_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
hand_n david_n lord_n saul_n 9,635 5 10.3237 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A91315 A vindication of Psalme 105.15. (touch not mine anoynted, and doe my prophets no harme) from some false glosses lately obtruded on it by Royallists. Proving that this divine inhibition was given to kings, not subjects; to restraine them from injuring and oppressing Gods servants, and their subjects; who are Gods anoynted, as well as kings: and that it is more unlawfull for kings to plunder and make war upon their subjects, by way of offence, then for subjects to take up armes against kings in such cases by way of defence. With a briefe exhortation to peace and unity. Prynne, William, 1600-1669. 1642 (1642) Wing P4125; Thomason E244_1; ESTC R3017 12,342 10

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

16. Dour 17.14 15. By vertue of which oath Kings are as strictly tyed not to wage war against their Subjects nor to oppresse or offer violence to their persons liberties or estates as their subjects are by their oath of allegiance not to rebel against them And seeing Kings were first created by and * Rom. 13.6 for their subjects and not their subjects by and for them and are in verity but publike servants for their peoples welfare their subjects not being so much theirs as they their subjects from whom they * Math. 22.17 to 22. receive both their maintenance and royalties There is as little if not far lesse reason for Kings to oppresse and take up offensive armes against their subjects though perchance more undutiful and refractory then they expect as there is for people to take up offensive armes against their Princes in case they become more oppressive and invasive on their persons goods lawes liberties then they should The husband hath no more right or authority to injure or destroy the wife or the master the servant the head the inferiour members then they have to destroy the husband master or head And as the leudnesse of the King husband parent master must not cause the people wife child servant to rebel against them and utterly to reject their bonds of duty so the undutifulnes or vices of the people wife child or servant must not cause the King husband parent or master as long as these relations remain actually undissolved to give over their care protection and vigilancy over them or any waies injuriously to intreat them 1 Pet. 2.18.2 Chro. 10. 11. Finally the * Exo. 1.15 to 20. Hebrew Midwives notwithstanding K. Pharohs command would by no means kil the Israelites male children though but bondmen and no free subjects and God blessed and built them houses for it but * Exod. 14.23 to 31. Psa 106.11 drowned Pharoah and his host in the red sea for drowning them and transgressing this inhibition Touch not mine anointed When * 1 Sam. 2.17 18. K. Saul commanded his footmen and guard to turn and slay the Priests of the Lord at Nob because their hand was with David whom he deemed a traytor and knew when he fled and did not shew it him they all refused this his royall unjust command though not only his Subjects but servants too and would not put their hand to fall upon them being Gods anointed And because Doeg the Edomite slew them by Sauls command Saul himself was soon after slaine by his own hand 1 Sam. 31.4 When * 1 Sam. 14 38 to 46. K. Saul had twice solemnly vowed to put his innocent son and subject Ionathan causelesly to death onely for tasting a little honey his subjects were so far from assisting him in this unjust action that they presently said to their King Shal Ionathan die who hath wrought so great salvation in Israel God forbid As the Lord liveth there shal not one haire of his head fall to the ground So the people RESCVED Jonathan that he died not notwithstanding Sauls double vow to the contrary and Ionathans being not only his subject but son too which is more neither are they taxed of disobedience or treason but commended for it When * 2 Chro. 10. K. Rehoboam raised an army to fight against the ten tribes who revolted from and rebelled against him for giving them harsh language by the advice of his yong Counsellors electing a new King over them God himself by his Prophet Shemiah spake thus to Rehoboam and his army * 2 Chro. 11.4 1 King 11.21 22 23 24. Ye shal not go up nor fight against your brethren return every man to his house for this thing is done of me Whereupon they all obeyed the words of the Lord and returned neither King nor subject daring to fight against them contrary to Gods expresse command though rebels how muchlesse then may Kings wage war upon their innocent loyall subjects When * 2 King 6 31 32 33. K. Iehoram in his fury made this rash vow God do so and more 〈◊〉 to me if the head of Elisha his subject shal stand on him this day and withall sent a messenger to Elisha his house to take away his head This Prophet was so far from submitting to this his unjust design that he commanded the Elders sitting with him to look when the messenger came and shut the doore ●nd hold him fast though the sound of his masters the Kings feet were behind him which they did not suffering the messenger or King to do him violence Yea the great * 2 Kin. 1.9 to 16. Prophet Eliah when K. Abaziah ●ent two Captains with their fifcies one after another to apprehend and bring him down to him by violence was so far from rendering himself into their hands that in his own defence he commanded fire twice together to come down frō heaven which consumed these two Captains and their men though sent by the King his Soveraign Which divine miracle from heaven wrought by God himself manifests That it ●s lawful for subjects to defend themselves against the unjust violence of their Kings and that it is dangerous for Kings themselves or any of their officers by their commands to offer violence or injury to their subjects * 1 Kings 13.6 This may be further cleared by Gods exemplary judgement upon K. Iero●●oam who stretching forth his hand to smite the Prophet which prophecied against his idolatrous Altar * Dan. 6. ●● dried up forthwith so that he could not pull it in again Upon those Princes who caused Daniel to be unjustly cast into the Lyons den where he was preserved safe from danger but they their wives and children ●ad there their bones broken in pieces by the Lyons er ever they came at the bottom of the den And upon ●hose * Dan. 3. mighty men in Nebuchadnezzars army who bound Shadrach Mesech and Abednego and cast them into the burning fiery fornace by the kings speciall command because they peremptorily refused to worship the golden image which he hath set up who for executing this his unjust precept were by Gods just vengence slain by the flame of the fiery furnace when as those three godly persons unjustly cast into it by the Kings command were miraculously preserved in the midst of the fiery furnace without any harme there being not an haire of their heads singed neither their coates changed nor the smell of fire passed upon them So safe is it for people to * Acts 4.12 c. 5.28 29 40 52. c. 11 1 to 19. Este 3.2 3 Iohn 7.33 to 48. obey God rather then men then kings themselves ●n their unjust commands so dangerous and destructive is it for Kings or others upon their unjust commands to offer any injury or violence to their subjects or violate this injunction Touch not ●●ine anointed c. In a word I read Ier. 22.3 to 12. that