the people should haue power to depose their king as well as they had to set him vppe Whereunto we answere that although it were at the first free vnto the people whether they would haue permitted themselues wholly to the power of the king or no yet when as they had once refigned vp their liberty and authority it was not in their power to call that their voluntarie graunt backe againe Secondly we answere that the people neuer had this power in their handes to make whome they would king they did indeede voluntarilie choose this kinde of gouernment but God gaue them a king whome they coulde neyther refuse at the first nor afterwardes depose to wit Saule with his posteritie and they being by God reiected Dauid with his seede for God kept in his hand the power of nominating the king as the expresse wordes of the scripture doe witnesse Deutro 17.15 Onely thou shalt make him king ouer them whom the Lord thy God shall giue vnto thee Againe it may be obiected forsomuch as not onely kings but also all other magistrates are set vp for the glorie of God and the good of the people that if they doe not not onely not further but also hinder these respectes they do break the condition of the bargain betwixt them the people and so do forfait their kingdomes into their hands as Saul did forfait his and Salomon by his idolatrie the gouernment of the ten tribes we answer confessing this to be true that the kings of Israel had the kingdome vpon the foresaid condition but yet neyther the kingdome was giuen nor the condition imposed to them by man but by God therefore they could not forfait their kingdom to man but only to God neither coulâ— any man exact this forfaiture at their handes without an extraordinarie and speciall commission from God So that vntil such time as God did either immediatly by his own hand or by the means of some man made the executioner of his will by extraordinarie reuelation depriue them of their kingdome euen the wicked and idolatrous kinges did remaine to the people in the full estate and right of the kingdome So after that both Saule had by his disobedience forfeited his kingdome of God and also Dauid was now both appointed by God and annointed by Samuel king in his steade yet Saul remained to the people the onely lawfull king of Israell yea no lesse lawfull then he was before or any other afterwardes vntill such time as God did take from him both his life and kingdome together This doth Dauid ingenuously confesse 1. Sam. 26.10.11 saying that it was not lawfull for himselfe or any other to touch Saule beeing Gods annointed for that he could be dispossessed by none but by God onely wherein he rested not doubting but that God would take him away eyther by naturall death or by the force of the enemie or immediately by his owne hand 1. Sam. 26.10 Likewise Salomon did forfaite his kingdome to God but yet thâ— ten tribes with al their kings made of themselues did vnlawfully and impiouslie rebell against Rehoboam for so speaketh Abiam 2. Chro. 13·6 7 You ought to haue acknowledged that God gaue the kingdome of Israel to Dauid and his sonnes for euer but Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat rose vp and rebelled against his Lord and naughtie men gathered themselues to him and strengthened themselues against Rehoboam So that although the defection came from the Lord as appeareth 2. Chro. 11.4 and was good in that respect beeing a iust punishment of idolatrie yet the action of the people rebelling against their lawfull and naturall king was altogether vnlawfull If it be obiected that Ieroboam was called to be king of the ten tribes by the word of God sent by the ministery of the prophet Achijah King 11.31 where God saith to Ieroboam by the prophet that he had â—iuen to him ten tribes of Israell to this we make two answeres First that although this defection as it came from God was good yet as it was practised by Ieroboam and the people it was vnlawful rebellion For there is in God a secret wil the which when it is contrarie to his reueâ—led will and worde cannot be executed by man without sinne vnlesse it be by an extraordinarie dispensation and therefore although God did make this his secret will knowen to Ieroboam to make his vnthankfulnesse in erecting idolatrie the more inexcusable yet he did not bid him rebell against Salomon neyther did he annointe him king as he did Iehu 2. King 9.6.7 who had the expresse commaundement of God to roote out kinge Achabs house Thus God foretolde Hazael that hee shoulde be kinge of Syria 2. King 8.13 yet he did not approue his detestable murthering of the kinge his master So did Zimri 1. King 16.12 although he also did execute the sentence which God had pronounced against the house of Bahasa king of the ten tribes yet because he was not appointed by God so to do his action was vnlawfull Secondly we answere that if that foretelling of Ieroboam were an extraordinarie dispensation yet his example doth not iustifie the rebellion of the people or of any other who haue not this warrant for their actions But Dauid did lawfully rebell against the posteritie of Saul and so did Iehu against Ioram 2. King 9. because they had the expresse word of God so to doe But heere this is to be noted that although this kingdome were at the first so instituted that all the kinges should by their disobedience forfait their kingdome to God â—nd so be deposed when he thought good yet Dauid and his posteritie were in a manner freede from this condition and from forfaiting their kingdome to God For Dauid a man according to the heart of God found such fauour in his sight that he made this solemne lawe oath and promise that although his children did forsake him yet he would not take the kingdom from them as he did from Saul but onely chastice them for their sinnes And therefore the seede of Dauid kept the crowne yea tho many of them were open idolatours til the whole nation of the Iewes was destroyed and caried away captiue into Babel for their idolatrie and other sinnes Therefore God is saide 2. Chro. 13.5 to haue giuen this kingdome to Dauid by a couenant of salt that is by a perpetuall and inuiolable couenant for so it was needfull that the promises of the Messias shoulde be annexed to some stocke or linage that out of it hee might cotinually be expected But to returne to the matter in hand if it be heere asked how God did punish the notorius sins misâ—emenors of these kings we answer that he did it either immediatly by his own hand as he did smite Ozias with leprosie for his intollerable presumption 2. Chr. 26 19. or else by some forraine nation or king as by the Philistines Aegyptians Chaldaeaens Assyriaens or some other
many and so to conclude this point and specially the first edict which the first king made and that by the immediate motion of the spirit of God because this is most for the purpose of the matter in hand We read 1. Sam. 11.17 that whenas Saule was to call the people together to battaile he gaue foorth such a peremptorie commaundement as neuer any of the Iudges or Elders did For taking a couple of oxen and deuiding them into peeces he sent them to all partes of the land with this message that whosoeuer did not follow him to battaile so shoulde it be done to his oxen Whereupon the people came roundly as one man for that as the text noteth the feare of the Lord that is of this greate power which the Lord had giuen to the king fell vpon them Saule might haue said with Dauid I am yet a tender and newe king and haue many enemies wherefore it is not meete that I shoulde exasperate the people by threarning them but it was the will of God that the people shoulde see in the beginning to what a kinde of power they had â—â—â—mitted themselues Sect. XII THus much of the power or authority of this kingdome the second part of the doctrine of it is the maiesty of it the fundamental lawes of the kingdom belonging therunto The maiesty of the kingdom is the great glorie and excellency wherein it far passeth other kindes of gouernment and for the which it is much more highly esteemed It was procured by these meanes First by that exceeding great power wherof we haue spoken for whereas the whole administration of all thinges is in the handes of one there the good estate of all men publikely and of euery one particularly doth depend on him whereby it commeth to passe that all mens eyes are set on him yea all men doe honour praise and admire him in whom they see great authoritie and riches and whose wisedome is more conspicuous then any others besides Secondly this kingdome was maiesticall by the first originall of it which it had not from man but from God This law is written Deut. 17.14 When thou hast possessed the land and sayest I will haue a king to raigne ouer me thou shalt make him king whome the Lord thy God shall choose and so the euent proued for the state of this kingdome in generall came from the people to whome also it belonged solemnly to acknowledge him whom God did appoint but the nomination of the particular man on whom this honour should be bestowed came from God who appointed first Saul with his posterity and afterwardes Saul being reiected Dauid and his seed By the which meanes God did choose all the kinges in Israel although he did immediately by his owne voyce onely appoint the first three to wit Saule Dauid and Salomon For euen as the fire wherewith the sacrifices were burnt although it were nourished euerie day by the priest putting fresh wood vnto it and so preserued by the same meanes wherby other fire is kept yet be cause at the first it came downe from heauen miraculously was therfore counted holy and wonderfull euen so was this kingdom because at the first it came from God although afterwardes it were continued by naturall and ordinarie propagation Hence it is that this kingdom is called the kingdome of Iehoua 2. Chro. 13.8 The badge and seale of this diuine originall of this kingdome was that holie vnction whereby these kinges were by the prophets of God solemnly in the name of God inaugurated and therefore the signe being put for the thing signified this annointing betokeneth the holinesse of it insomuch that when the king of Israell is as it were to be painted forth in the natiue colours of his maiestie he is called the annointed of the Lorde Thus 1. Sam. 24.7 God forbid saith Dauid that I should lay my handes on Saule seeing he is the annoynted one of GOD. And 2. Samuell 1.14 hee saith to him who had helpt kinge Saule to kill himselfe Howe was it that thou diddest not feare to put out thy hande to kill the Lordes annoynted The third lawe tending to the maiestie of this kingdome was that it was not any vncertaine and moueable state but constant and fixed in one place it was tyed first to one tribe namely to the tribe of Iuda that by God speaking by the mouth of Iacob the first founder of this nation for in his sonnes it began to be deuided into many tribes and families and so came into the forme of a people the prophesie iâ— written Gen. 49. The rod shall not depart from Iuda nor a law giuer c. Secondly it was tyed to one and the same familie to wit to the house of Dauid for euer and went by hereditarie right and succession in lineall discent so that continually the sonne succeeded the father The which lawe although it was established in the like gouernementes in other places yet it coulde seldome take place for any long time by reason of the want of right successours But it was heere kept in continuall force and that by the marueilous prouidence of God who as he promised did alwaies giue to Dauid his seruaunt a sonne of his owne loynes to sitte vpon his throne The which prouidence of GOD may especially be noted in the straunge preseruation of Ioas from the cruell handes of that monster Athalia 2. King 11.3 By this meanes it came to passe that this kingdom was both naturall and in processe of time ancient yea after a sort immortall For the first we need not doubt but that there was an exceeding great loue and reuerence of this king wrought in the mindes of the people whenas they sawe that he had not obtained that place by ambition faction force of armes or any other sinister or violent meanes but was euen borne vnto them and by nature or rather by God the ruler and desposer of all naturall causes appointed and distinated to that calling Yea also in time by this hereditarie succession the kingdome became of great antiquitie which addeth much to the maiestie of meane thinges much more to those which in many other respectes are excellent Euen as men doe ascribe a kinde noâ— onely of reuerence but euen of religion to okes and other trees which haue a long time kept their standing for so in continuance of time they take so deepe roote and gather such strength as that they cannot be moued whereas at the first they may easely be shaken downe so kingdoms continuing long in the same stocke become firme and maiesticall whereas being often transplanted they are weake and contemptible and doe often fall euen in the beginning Thus fell Abimelech his kingdome and euen this kingdome was sore shaken in the defection of the ten tribes because the memory of Ierobaal grandfather to Abimelech a priuate and base man and of Isai the father of Dauid was not cleane worne away and therefore they said
of the one Iudg. 28. Who is Abimelech that we should serue him is not he the sonne of Ierobaal and of the other in like manner what part haue we with Dauid the sonne of Isai 2. Chro. 10.16 2. Sam. 20.1 yea thus the kingdome is made after a sort immortall when as the father doth rise againe in the sonne and so continueth for euer For hence it was that the gouernment of the iudges was so contemned of the people because it was a newe vp-start gouernment the iudge being lately taken from a base estate As Gedeon Saul confesse of themselues that their kinred family and birth was of the meanest of the people and that therefore they were the vnfittest to beare rule Iudg. 6.15 1. Sam. 9.21 The last and the greatest cause of the maiestie of these kings was this that they were the progenitors yea and the predecessors of that great Messias which was to come of the linage of Dauid to gouern not that land onely but the whole world Luke 1.32.33 the very expectation of whom made this kingdome glorious aboue measure for that they according to the ignorance of the times and the infancie of the Church dreaming of a temporal king thought that in him all the power riches renowne and glory of the world should be brought to their kingdome Sect. XIII THus we see the causes of the maiesty of this kingdome now we are to consider the meanes whereby this maiesty did shew foorth it selfe It appeared in the glorious stately pompe and magnificence of the whole life and behauiour yea of all the actions of the king and generally of all things appertaining to the kingdome For the apparrell of the king it was such as might not onely distinguish him from his subiectes but also serue to expresse the maiesty of his state Likewise for his whole house the statelinesse of his palaces the daintinesse of his fare the number of his seruantes and retinue that all were correspondent euen in the time of Dauid we may gather 2. Sam. 19.35 where old Barzelli refuseth the kinges offer who woulde haue kept him in his house because hee coulde not taste the daintie meates nor be delighted with the voyce◠of singing men and women which were vsed in the king◠palace Hitherto also is to be referred the whole storie of Salomon in whose time this glorie of the kingdome was euen in the full the infinite prouision of his house the glorious houses which he built for GOD and for himselfe with incredible magnificence all which it shall not be irkesome to rehearse as they are described in the story for so wee reade 1. King 4. verse 20.22.23.26 and Chapter 10. ver 11.12 c. And Salomons breade for one daie was thirtie quarters of manchette flower and threescore quarters of meale tenne stalled oxen and twentie out of the pastures and a hundred sheepe beside hartes buckes wilde goates and capons and hee had fortie stalles of horses for chariotes and twelue thousande horsemen The waight of golde that came to him in one yeare was sixe hundred threescore and sixe talentes of golde beside that he had of marchantes and of the marchandize of the spices and of all the kinges of Arabia and of the Lordes of the countrie Also he made two hundred targets of beaten goulde sixe hundred sicles of goulde wente to a target And hee made three hundred shieldes of beaten golde the pounde waight of golde went to one shielde and the king put them in the house of the woode of Libanon and the king made a greate seate of Iuory and couered it with the best gold and the seate had six steppes and the top of the seate was round behinde and there were pummels on eyther side of the seate and two Lyons stoode beside the pummels and there stoode twelue Lyons on the steppes six on one side There was no like worke seene in any kingdome and all kinge Salomons drinking vessels were of golde and likewise all the vessels of the house of the woode of Libanon were of pure golde As for siluer it was nothing woorth in the daies of Salomon for the kinges nauy of shippes went on the sea vnto Tharsis with the nauy of Hirams shippes euen once in three yeares went the nauy to Tharsis and brought golde and siluer Elephantes teeth Apes and Peacockes And so king Salomon exceeded all the kinges of the earth both in riches wisedome thus farre the text After the time of Salomō together with the sincerity of religion this maiesty of the kingdome did decrease for in the raigne of Rehoboam both the ten tribes fell away from this kingdome and Ierusalem was spoyled by the king of Aegypt so that the targets of gold were turned into brasse but vnder Iehosophat both religion and the kingdome recouered part of the ancient glorie for it is said 2. Par. 18.1 that Iehophat had great riches and glory And likewise in the raigne of Ezechi◠we reade 2. Chro. 32.27 that he had exceeding much riches and honour and he gat himselfe treasures of siluer and gold precious stones and spices shieldes and all manner of pleasant iewels Likewise this maiesty required that the kinges whole behauiour should haue in it that stately grauity which beseemeth so high a place that he should take no meane or base action in hand but such as the perfourmance whereof might be for his glory and renowne By this argument Dauid disswadeth Saule from persecuting him any further saying 1. Sam. 26.20 To whome is the king of Israel come foorth and what is this that he doth Doth he not behaue himselfe as one who chaseth a Partridge vppe and downe in the mountaines And for the behauiour of the kinges person Michol Saules daughter requiteth Dauid with the like noting in him such lightnesse which was as she thought vnbeseeming the maiesty of the king for when she had seene Dauid daunce for ioy before the Arke she saide O howe glorious was the king of Israel this day whenas he vncouered himselfe before the maydens of his seruantes as foolish or mad men vse to doe 2. Sam. 6.20 An finally this part of the iudgement of the kingdome and of the booke which Samuel wrote of this matter is extant 1. Sam. 8. vers 11. c. where it is said that the king will haue horsemen and chariots yea Eunuches and women bakers and cookes and of his magnificence in giuing vineyardes and landes to his seruantes the which place is not to be vnderstood of a tyrannie but of the naturall state of this kingdome as may appeare 1. Sam. 9.20 where when Saule was carefull for his fathers asses which were lost Samuel telleth him that he neede not minde them seeing whatsoeuer was good pretious and to be desired in all Israell it did belong in some sort to him and to all his fathers house The which wordes are not so to be vnderstood as if the propertie of mens goods did belong to the
is called the visible Church by relation had to the catholik Church the which by reason of the dispersed members of it is inuisible as hath bene declared whenas euery particular Church yea euen priuate Churches and so consequently the visible Church consisting thereof doth make a publick profession of the fayth This visible Church doth continually existe in the world forsomuch as GOD hath appointed that his name shoulde continually as longe as the worlde endureth be called vpon and worshipped in one place or other as the story of the Ch. doth witnes We confesse that it hath often lurcked in secret places and often been so ouer-shadowed with errours superstition and idolatrie that it could hardly be discerned and so hath been euen as the sunne is in the eclipse yet neuer wholly taken away for whenas there was but one particular Ch. in the world yea this particular church was not publick but priuate within one mans family and secret lurking in a corner so that they who liued at that time or in the ages following could not define where the Church was at such a time yet that Church made the visible Church For their profession was visible and open among themselues and also to others although it were not seen at that instant for a thing which is not actually seen may be visible Secondly this is to be noted that in the first ages of the world before the time of the Gospell the visible Ch. did often consist of one only particular church there being no moe in the world but since the publishing of the gospel it hath hitherto shall alwaies consist of many Lastly as touching the place of this visible Ch. although it be not tyed to any certaine place yet it hath alwaies bene cheifly in some one parte of the world So we knowe that first it was wholly in the east partes in the countries of Mesopotania Syria Iurie and others adioyning vnto these Afterwards in the first time of the gospell it was cheifly in Asia And in these last ages we see that it hath been almost wholly in Europe and whether God will change the dwelling place of it again or no euen transporte it to the fourth parte of the world lately found out or to any other place it is knowne to himselfe onely Diuers â—ther points should be added for the full declaration of â—he nature and state of the visible Church But many of them aâ—â— common with the catholick Church and therefore are handled in the first Chapter where they may be considered The rest we cut off for breuities sake because this treatise is already growen beyond our purpose and expectation So then to conclude if to this visible Church we do adde the dispersed members of the catholick Church we haue the catholick Church And so the end of this treatise is brought to the beginning FINIS Why the people desired an alteration of the state The occasion of this alteration Magistracie Gods ordinance The church hath neuer beene without magistracie How God erecteth magistracie among infidels Why God appointed magistracie In what respect the magistrate beareth the image of God The kingdome of Israel a type of Christes kingdome How God was the king of Israel The iudicial law in part abrogated by the erecting of this kingdome God put from his kingdome What authoritie the people had before the time of the Kinges No authoritie in Israel but in the hands of the king The king to his subiects as a father to his children The prophets neuer reproue the people for not resisting the idolatrous kings Vnlawfull to vse violeeÌ„e against the kiâ—g in the maintenance of religion The people could not resume their liberty giuen into the handes of the kings It belonged not to the people but to God to nominate the king Saul remained the lawfull king of Israell after that Dauid was annointed and appointed to the kingdome The rebellion of Ieroboam of the tenne tribes vnlawfull Hazaels rebellion foretold by God but not permitted God would not take the kingdome from Dauids posterity The kingdome so annexed to the house of Dauid that it could not be taken from it God neuer approued any conspiracy made against any of the kings With what weapons this people might fight against their kinges Why absolute monarchies were more in vse in the first ages of the world The gouernment of the kings compared with the former Ecclesiasticall persons subiect to the authoritie and iurisdiction of the king God deferred the building of the Temple till that the kingdome were erected The Church with the common welth make but one bodie Resisting of wicked kings weakeneth the authority of good kings Ecclesiastical constitutions made by the authority of the kinges The kings exempted from the Iudiciall lawes Great power bringeth with it great maiesty The diuine original of this kingdome made it maiesticall The annointing of these kinges signified the holinesse of their persons and functions Long continuance of hereditarie succession made this kingdome strong and maiesticall What made the gouernment of the Iudges to be contemned The statelinesse of this kingdome in the daies of Salomon The maiesty of this kingdome increase and decrease as did the sinceritie of religion The kinge might lawfully exact of the people not only for necessarie vses but for pompe pleasure An absolute Monarchie is a chargeable and costly gouernment The people had this gouernment in great reuerence and estimation This kingdome standeth yet in Christ. The people account the kinges better then ten thousand of themselues This gouernment doth more resemble the authority of God then any other kind doth Why God was offended with the people asking a king God did alwaies like this gouernment and purpose to establish it God the author of kingdomes and the setter vp of kinges The kinge held his kingdome as from God and was subiect to his will and worde This example of Samuel teaching the people the state of the kingdome is to be followed by the ministers of Gods word Nothing better beseeming Christians then due subiection to magistates A compendious abstract of the state of the kingdome of Israel Care to be had of posterity Alteration of gouernment in any common wealth troublesome and dangerous The worde Catholicke not vsed in the scripture The catholicke Church was twise contained in one familie The profession of the true religion maketh one a member of the catholicke Church Infantes are members of the catholike Church Hypocritical professours are members of the catholicke Church Excommunication doth not separate from the catholicke but only froÌ„ the visible Church Heretikes as Arians and papistes are to be counted members of the catholicke Church The papist holdeth the foundation of Christian religion Whole Churches haue held grieuous errours The state of the Church before the comming of Christ. Faith and fundamentall errours together The same errour more pernitious at one time theÌ„ at another Greater hope of the saluation of an ignorant then of a learned
from the safety of the people of states and commonwealthes the ground square and end of all good pollicie carieth with it such a faire shew of equitie and necessitie that like vnto a violent streame it hath caried many headlong in heate to condemne and reiect vtterly these absolute Monarchies as tyrannicall and barbarous kindes of gouernment pernitious to men yea altogether vnlawful and vnmeete for the Church of God But we ought not to suffer our selues to be deceiued by any appearance or pretence whatsoeuer or in respect of any inconueniences although neuer so great to iudge that to be vnlawfull and prophane which God by establishing it in his Church hath shewed to be holy and lawfull But for the further resoluing of this question it is requisite that we againe put you in minde that we doe not heere speake eyther what ought to be the state of al kingdomes in this behalfe or that this is the best kinde of gouernment but only doe shew what was the state of this kingdome of Israell In the which it seemeth that the whole power of ruling the lande was giuen by God and by the people into the handes of the king without any exception whatsoeuer insomuch that the people did not reserue to themselues any power whereby they might lawfully resist his authoritie or oppose themselues to his proceedings although vnlawfull and vniust much lesse take from him the kingdome or to offer any manner of violence vnto his person For the authoritie of this king ouer his people was no lesse then is the authoritie of a father in his familie in respect of his children who if he doe iniuriously intreat any of them or not carefully keep his own goods or liue any way disorderly it is the duety of his children if not with silence to suffer it yet with great modesty to admonish him of it But if they should ioyne themselues together and offer any violence vnto him especially if they should throw him out of his house all men woulde count them rebellious and vngratious children But if they shoulde take his life from him they were to be esteemed notoriously wicked ye rather as monsters worthy to be abhorred of all men So it seemeth that the state of this kingdome was such as that no subiect of what place soeuer no not the whol people iointly could lawfully vse any violence against the kings person or proceedinges and that the king might although not lawfully in respect of the lawe of God of men or of nature yet safely and freely in respect of his subiectes doe whatsoeuer pleased him according as Iacob foretelleth Gen. 49.9 that Iuda the king of his brethren should be as the great Lion who when he laieth himselfe downe who shall raise him vppe or disquiet him The trueth heereof appeareth in the whole course of the story of the kings who praesuming vpon this whole and vndeuided authority did neuer feare or doubt to doe whatsoeuer they listed without asking leaue eyther at nobles elders or people Hence came that foolish and tyrannicall answer which RehoboaÌ„ made to the people threatning them 1. King 12.12 in this manner My least part shal be heauier then my fathers loynes whereby he meant that he would encrease those heauie burdens of tributes which his father had laide vpon them For but that he knewe verie well the state of his kingdome to be such as that he might both say and doe what he listed without controlement he had beene more then mad to make such an answere And hence it came that the idolatrous kinges did neuer sticke by their sole authoritie to set vp open idolatrie not once minding who would be offended therewith and likewise the continuall practise of the people doth declare that they did not violeÌ„tly oppose theÌ„selues to the doings eyther of the good or of the wicked kinges but suffered religion to stand and fall according to their pleasure Yea the dealing of God himselfe doth prooue the same who when he purposed to preserue Dauid against the fury of Saule would neuer suffer him to oppose Ceila or any other of Saules citâ—es against him but made him fly first into the mountains and deserts and afterwardes out of the land to the Philistines Yea Dauid although he were appointed by the expresse worde of God to sâ—cceede Saule in the kingdome yet he was so farre from laying violent handes vpon him that as we reade 1. Sam. 24.6 his heart smote him that is his conscience did accuse him that he had behaued himselfe disloyally against the king in that he had offered violence to the kings garment because that was as a threatning of death vnto him and a greate disgrace Yea further we doe not reade that God did euer by any of his prophets stirre vp the people to maintaine his true woâ—shippe by violence against the kinges or euer reproue them because they had suffered them to set vppe idolatrie which is an euident proofe of this point For if it had beene lawfull to resist in any case then surely in the maintenance of the true worshippe of God and of his glorie But heereof there is a great question made for although this king had power in ciuill matters to doe not onely right iustice without the helpe of any other power but also wrong without resistance shall we therefore giue vnto him this power in the cause of religion that he may deface the worshippe of God at his pleasure It may seeme much better that not onely kings should be throwen downe from their thrones but also that heauen and earth shoulde goe togither then that God should be dishonoured and detestable idolatrie erected We confesse that it is a most fearefull thing that the king of Israell who hath his authority from God should vse the same to dishonor God and thrust not only men out of their houses landes but also the great God of heauen earth out of his teÌ„ple and Church yea in trueth in some sort out of the world for God had tyed his visible Church to this land And therefore we answere that as it is vsually saide Si ius violandum regni causâ violandum so Si ius regni sit violandum religionis causa est violandum that if it be lawfull for the people of Israell for any cause to resist their lawfull king it is lawfull in the defence of the true religion and Gods glory But as hath beene said it seemeth that the state of this kingdome would not beare any resistance no not in this case much lesse in any other No man yea no company of men could for any offence committed by the king eyther against God or man the first or second table call him to account summon him to appeare in iudgement or vse any manner of violence eyther in word or deede against him Now we are to answere those thinges which may be obiected against this assertion Sect. VI. FIrst it may seeme agreeable to reason that