Selected quad for the lemma: hand_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
hand_n	body_n	foot_n	member_n	6,594	5	8.0095	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A62715	A call to the Shulamite, or to the scattered and divided members of the church delivered and published upon occasion by Thomas Tanner.	Tanner, Thomas, 1630-1682.	1674 (1674)	Wing T139; ESTC R30157	22,246	32

as the Papists judge of Us that we own even these as a part of the Church of England against their wills and are ever ready to regain their good will and to reduce them to a better state for though we speak it soft and mildly we do judg indeed that these do much interrupt and disturb the way of salvation to themselves and others and do much impeach and prejudice those amongst our selves who before did run well and would yet proceed to do so if they did not object their rubbs and impediments in the way We answer further that whereas it is truely said Opinionum varietas opinantium unitas non sunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Variety of opinions and unity of Opiners are not inconsistent Our Church alloweth a greater latitude in this kind than any of those that do pretend a latitude only to palliate their own restraints for amongst them if one be for Lay-Elders and another against it one for the power of Pastors another for the power of the People one for laying on of hands after baptism and another against it nay one for free-will and another for free grace and so in certain lesser questions it hath been found enough to divide and sub-divide them into Parties Churches feuds and animosities whereas in our Church great variety of opinions may and do consist very well with the Unity of the Church Every Scholar knows how ingenious men do abound in their own senses even in the Schools and it is not at all to the prejudice of the Church but may be rather to her benefit that certain points be not carried otherwise in extremes but that there may be here a little and there a little and one to ballance with another But when this rule of variety or diversity of opinion is traduced to a contrariety of establishment they must give us leave to assume that such a diversity is utterly inconsistent with the Unity of the Church In vain therefore do they declaim in general against schism as much as we could wish being sensible of what Pamelius hath delivered viz. that the name of schism hath been alwaies ignominious in the Church and on all hands condemned whilst they defend in particular all the Sects at this day besides the Quakers to be true particular Churches that a man may safely joyn with any of them to do better that separation is no schism that the Church which imposeth though it be but things indifferent is the schismatical Church if it will not vary from her orders for the satisfaction of the weak or scrupulous and that in such cases the schismatical Churches which are so called are the truer and purer Churches of Christ and have all Church power within themselves to all intents and purposes for where can we now find a Schism which is culpable or a Church which can stand if she must vary from her order upon all demands or any possibility either of a Church or of a Schism By all which it seems that some of our dissenting Brethren domisdoubt themselves as lyable unto this charge of schism and would either cloak it neatly if they could or if it come to the worst defend that schism is no such sin as they sometimes granted and that they may lawfully live in schism especially when their maintenance ariseth that way as some have put themselves upon that exegency and so are bound to maintain that which maintaineth them framing their lives and doctrines according to their interests Not to grate any further upon that point wherein they are so tender there remaineth yet another word about the Unity of the Spirit that they have the same desires if not more intense and earnest than we our selves for the good of souls for the saving of themselves and others We do not doubt but that there is a zeal of God amongst many of them though not according unto a right knowledge not because they are more weak or ignorant than We but only otherwise perswaded or inclined howsoever it hath happened to them We trust that many of them do sincerely mean as they profess And so far as this is true we acknowledge the working of one and the same spirit in them and Us We look upon them as a part of the body and wherein they are not only not against Us but for Us that they are so far One with us But then if they do really believe that we have the same spirit amongst us or some of us at least why should they so magnifie the same spirit in themselves above the same in Us as if there were not the same power and purity of the spirit amongst Us to conveigh grace unto the hearers or to make them perfect that do come unto Us which Query we have the more reason to put home to our Brethren since they may seem now to cease from their instance upon the work of conversion a gift which they thought almost singular to themselves before as a thing below their Auditories or to preach against prophaneness wherein they were once the Boanerges's of the Age seeing their followers must be taken for no such and it may be cannot well bear it so that all their writings of late which are the reports of their Preachments to such as cannot hear them do run in a new strain which is much different from that way which they did admire and applaud before Again if they do acknowledg such an Unity of Spirit with Us how can they think or pretend as they do to be compleat without Us and to have no need of Us how happeneth it that they do so little weigh what the Apostle saith that one member hath need of another And if the foot shall say because I am not the hand I am not of the body is it therefore not of the body And if the ear shall say because I am not the eye I am not of the body is it therefore not of the body The eye cannot say unto the hand I have no need of thee Nor again the head to the feet I have no need of you That there should be no schism in the body but the members should have the same care one for another But if these members separate from the body can each member which is separated subsist by it self or any few that joyn together presently constitute themselves an entire Body a complete Church Or can any of their Officers which was but as an hand or a foot before make it self an heart or an head in a New Church and think that in truth they are such if they be not altogether useless which cannot but put us in mind of Iotham's Parable and though we shall abstain from applying the prickles of it to our Brethren yet we doubt that it is this ambition of some hand or foot or other which thinks it self worthy of a better place that is one of the sad occasions of such dismembring But when they have dismembred and divided