is from the Highest Power that the Canon hath the force of a Law no marvell if the Highest Power upon just causes may recede from that Law either in the whole or in some particular case For Lawes are wont either to be abrogated or temper'd and limited by the Law-givers as afore is shewed Yea there is no need of abrogation or solution of the Law when as the Lawyers agree in this that by the generall words in the Law set down the right of the Highest Power is never conceiv'd to be excluded 'T is true the Examples of Elections made by Bishops prove it is not necessary that Elections be made by the Highest Power the Canons also shew the same Elections are rightly made by Bishops with consent of the Highest Power but neither of these is in question The Question is whether it be also lawfull for the Highest Power to make Election That it is lawfull we have the judgement of the best both among the Emperours and the Bishops In the first Synod of Constantinople Theodosius commanded the names of all that were proposed should be given to him in papers reserving to himself the choyce of one What can be more clear One among all the Bishops propos'd Nectarius the Emperour makes choise of him and persisteth in it against the will of many Bishops who seeing the Emperour would not be remov'd give place and yeild him that reverence which was due unto him in a matter not prohibited by Law Divine Who sees not this was done beside the Canons for according to the Canons the Emperour had no share in the Election but here the Emperour alone electeth that is designs the person The Bishops as also the Clergy and people approve of the Election But 't is one thing to elect another to approve of the Election The Bishops approve because it was their Office after Baptisme to impose hands upon Neitarius as yet a lay man and Catechumen And hert too we observe the Canon was not followed for according to the Canons a Catechumen nor Neophite could not be elected The Clergy also and the people doe approve because to them belong'd the Tryal which how far it differs from Election is shew'd above Many examples we might alleage of Elections not Cunonicall but Imperiall Why the Emperours themselves elected we deny not they had peculiar causes but this pertains not to the question of right but prudence Certainly the Emperours believ'd it to be lawfull for them before they consider'd whether or no it were expedient For of things unlawfull there ought to be no consultation To say the cause hereof was some Divine revelation or inspiration in such an age of the Church is a meer refuge of pertinacious ignorance to say the Domination of the Roman Bishops was the cause of Imperiall elections when as yet that Episcopacy was not turn'd into temporall Dominion is to be quite mistaken in the order of times Nor yet can wee doubt but the more Sanctimony abated in the Clergy and Obedience was slackned in the people the more just cause had the Highest Powers to vindicate Election to themselves In the West that Bishops were most often and for a long time elected by the most Christian Kings of France without any suftrage of the people or Clergy is written in all the French Histories as it were with Sun-beams What was said of the Domination of the Roman Bishops as if he had given occasion to Kings to draw to themselves the Elections besides that it is before answered cannot be applyed to the Bishops of France and to those times when the French Kings did not yet possesse Italy Yea on the contrary because the French Kings used this right in their own kingdome therefore also in Italy did Charls the great assume this to himself that hee might not with lesse power governe Italy than France and Germany For it is most truly observed by Godalstus and others the Decree made in Pope Adrians time pertains only to the Italian Bishops when in other parts the compleat right of Election was in Charls before In vaine also a recourse is had to the wealth of Bishop-pricks the Temporall Jurisdictions annexed to them for even in the times of Charls the Great and much more in the antient and purer times Bishopricks were but poor and slender as is noted by that most searching Antiquary Onuphrius And for Jurisdictions the Bishops in Charls his time had none annexed to their Bishopricks but this came into use at last after the avulsion of Germany from France when the Ottoes were Emperonrs in Germany And the Jurisdictions were so far from being the cause of Imperiall Elections that on the contrary therefore were Jurisdictions granted unto Bishops because the Emperours were most assured of their fidelity being chosen by themselves and thought the custody of Cities might therefore most safely bee committed to them as the same Onuphrius hath observed Some have been deceiv'd by the name of Investiture Because the word is used of Fees especially therefore have they thought all that is sayd of investitures of Bishops to belong to territories and Lands which is a grosse â—rrour for to vest and to invest are old words of German Originall that signify the collation of any right whatsoever and are therefore found in old Authors applyed to all Offices both Civill and Ecclesiasticall It appears by a passage in the life of Romanus Bishop of Rouen about the year 623. that Investiture by the staffe was almost 300. years before Territories were given to Bishops which began under Otto the first Emperour of that name And truly if Investiture had been with respect to Civill Jurisdiction it would have been by the Scepter Sword or Banner as the manner of those times was not by a ring and staffe Wherefore although the most Christian Kings did not challenge to themselves imposition of hands which maketh Presbyters yet these two things they esteemed as their right to joyn this man unto this Church which is signified by the Ring and to conferre upon him Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall that is judgement concerning Sacred affairs with a certaine publike power which is signified by the staffe For to the King himself also when he was first consecrated together with the Scepter was wont to be given a staffe And by this saith Aimonius the defence of the Churches that is a power to maintaine Religion was deliver'd to him from God for the Offices corresponded to the signs as also a Canon was vested by a Book Many ages after when piety had begotten opulency and the daughter laid a snare for the mother the Emperours almost detruded from their most antient right began to shew the indignity of the thing by this argument among the rest because the Bishops by their munificence possessed Lands and territories But never did the Election of them depend upon this alone being more antient than the same munificence Moreover the accessory cannot have so much force as to draw
would affirme much lesse could prove that they were known of old Tertullian prescribing against Hereticks among other things declares how much their temerarious inconstant light Ordinations differ from the Rule of the antient Church This day saith he the man is a Presbyter who to morrow is a laick Nothing could be more clearly said to make it appeare that temporary Presbyters were in those times unkown to the Catholick Church It is not say some materiall to the nature of the Office whether it be undertaken for a time or for ever If this be so I may wonder that Pastors also employed in the word and Sacraments are not made Annuall somewhere But if this be absurd whence I pray but because as the gifts of God are without repentance so the Divine Offices were instituted by him for the perpetuall uses of the Church He that hath put his hand to the Plow and looketh back is not sit for the kingdome of God that is for the ministry of the Church Wherefore this very change of Assessors is no light argument that this is an invention of Humane prudence no institution of Law Divine Secondly All the antient Church by the name of Presbyters urder stood no other men but Pastors employed in the word and Sacraments I speak not of the word old men or Seniors and Elders whereby 't is certaine sometimes age sometimes Magistracy is meant but of the Greek word which in the Latine tongue doth alwaies signify the Pastorall dignity and Office and so it doâ—h also in the Greek Authours wheresoever the word Presbyter notes any thing else but age or Magistracy We are not yet come to that place of Paul which belongs rather to the question of Divine Right and of the Elders of the old Testament there will be place to speak hereafter Of so great a number of Fathers of so many volumes of books after so long canvasing of this controversie not so much as one place hath been alleged wherein the Presbyteriall dignity is ascribed to any other than Pastors When yet if there had been two sorts of Presbyters not often but a hundred yea a thousand times mention of them ought to have been made especially in the Canons which describe unto us the whole Government of the Church at least the manner of electing those Presbyters non-Pastors would somewhere shew it self And although the Defendant or he that is on the Negative is not to make proofe yet were it easy to produce infinite places of the Fathers which attribute to all Presbyters the right of feeding the flock of Baptising and exhibiting the Lords body and so far equall all the Presbyters to Bishops and call them the Apostles Successors which also declare the Presbyters punishment was to be remov'd from the Presbytery or for a time to be admitted only to the Communion of the Laicks which farther shew that maintenance was given to every one and a much severer Discipline prescrib'd for them than others Moreover Laws are extant too of the Presbyters Privileges and immunity from Civill Courts and burdens and many other things there are which will not suffer us to acknowledge any Presbyters but Pastors only Some allege a History of the penitentiary Presbyter and sharply reprehend the abrogation of him which yet at other times they like very well when the Popish Confession is opposed But who ever heard of any Penitentiary that was not a Pastor or when did the antients ever believe that the use of the Keys might be separated from the Ministry of the Word and Sacraments Certainly Christ gave the Keys to them to be used to whom he gave power to Preach and to Baptise What God hath joyn'd let no man put a sunder Ambrose of the right of binding and loosing saith This right is permitted only to the Priests and elsewhere Those Keys of the kingdome of Heaven all we Priests have receiv'd in the Blessed Apostle Peter Jerim of these that succeed in the Apostolicall degree They saith he having the Key judge before the day of judgement and in the same place It is no easy matter to stand in the place of Paul to keep the degree of Peter Chrysostome This bond of the Priests tyeth the very soule No man is ignorant that the Fathers by Sacerdotes or Priests doe meane Pastors to whom the Word and Sacraments are entrusted indeed beside the use of the new Testament but not without Authority of Scripture for in Esay God foretelling the calling of the Gentiles by the Gospell saith And I will also take of them the converted Gentiles for Priests and for Levits Wherefore the exercise of the Keys and the Right to absolve penitents according to the judgement of all the Fathers agree to Priests alone that is to Presbyters the Depositaries of the Word and Sacraments Wherefore also these Presbyters who specially attended to the absolving of Penitents are to be thought no other than Priests whom the new Testament stileth Pastors Now as the word Presbyter when it signifies a Function Ecclesiasticall is never found in the Fathers applyed to other than Pastors so neither is the Latine word Seniors Tertullian speaking of the use of the Keys judgement is given saith he with great Gravity as in the presence of God and it is a very great prejudgement of the future judgement if any one hath so affended as to be excluded from Common Prayer and the Assembly and all holy commerce The most approved Seniors are the Presidents having obtained the honour by testimony not by price for no Divine thing is set to sale That in those times Presbyteries consisted only of Pastors Calvin himself confesseth wherefore Tertullian putting the Greek word into Latine cals them Seniors who had the power of the Keys For in Greek they are call'd Presbyters which word in its primary signification expressing age was after transferred to Civill Dignities and last of all to Ecclesiasticall Let all the Acts of Synods that ever were bee read quite thorough there will be found no Seniors that were not Pastors Moreover the word major natu or Elder which seemeth proper to age began to be applyed to Pastors in imitation of the Greek word Firmilian Bishop of Cesarea The Majors are the Presidents in the Church who have also the power to Baptise and to impose hands and to ordaine He hath given sufficient caution to understand no other then the Pastors So then the words Presbyter Senior Major have a threefold signification noting First age Secondly Magistracy Thirdly Priesthood Nor only was the name of Seniors common to Magistrats and Pastors but the Assembly of Presbyters the Presbytery which Ignatius calls the Sacred System Jerom bath translated Senate The Church hath a Senate the Assembly of Presbyters that is of those Presbyters who at the beginning saith he were equall to the Bishops and by whose Counsell the Church was governed Tertullian by such another Metaphor stiles the Clergy an Ordo or State The Difference
the Priests might do the same so is there nothing in the Deacons function which is excepted from the function of the Presbyter because the Deacons were given to the Presbyters as Assistants in lesser matters Before Deacons were ordained one of the Apostles Judus Iscariot was Treasurer of the Lords mony and after him all the Apostles for some time distributed their allowance among the poor untill the contention risen among the Widows and the greatnesse of their other employments enforced them to use the help of others And yet the Institution of Deacons did not so acquit the Presbyters but they had still the poor under their inspection Hence were the Bishops chiefly trusted with the dispensation of the Churches mony and that with so full a Power as to be unaccountable but to use part of it for the necessities of themselved and other men and to deliver part to the Presbyters to be disposed among the poor as appears in the Canons which are entitled Apostolicall and in the Synod of Antioch Unlesse the antient Custome had been so in vain had the Apostle commanded a Bishop to be hospital in vain had the Antiochian Collections been deliver'd to the Presbyters at Hierusalem Now concerning the Constitution of Presbyters whose function is principall 01 and most necessary we must note four things that by many writers are not accurately enough distinguished The first is the faculty it self of preaching of administring the Sacraments and using the Keyes wich we will call the Mandate a second thing is the application of this faculty to a certain person which by the received word we will stile Ordination a third is the application of this person unto a certain place or Congregation which is called Election the fourth is that whereby a certain person in a certain place exerciseth his Ministery under the publick protection and with publick Authority and let us call this if you please Confirmation The first is to be distinguished from the second To illustrate this with a Simile The Husbands power is from God the application of that Power unto a certain person proceeds from consent whereby yet the right it self is not given For if it were given by consent by consent also might Matrimony be dissolved or agreement made that the Husband should not rule over the Wife which is not true The Imperiall Power is not in the Electors therefore they doe not give it yet they doe apply it to a certain person The Power of life and death is not in the people before they joyn together in a Common-wealth for a private man hath no right unto the Sword yet by them it is applied unto a Senate or single person Christ without controversie is He from whom that right of Preaching of exhibiting the Sacraments and of using the Keyes doth arise and receive its vertue He also by his Divine providence as he preserves the Church so procures that the Church may not want Pastors The second differs as much from the third as for a Physician to be Licensed to practice Physick and to be chosen Physician to such a City or for a Lawyer to be admitted to the honour of that Profession and to be made a Syndic of some Corporation These two have been ever distinct and sometimes sepatate The Apostles were truly Presbyters and so they call themselves for the greater Power includes the lesse yet was not their Injunction appropriate to any certain place The Evangelists also were Presbyters but to no place bound And so long after was Pantanus ordained by Demetrius Bishop of Alexandria Frumentius by Athanasius and were sent to preach the Gospell through India Which in our time hath been also done and would it were done more carefully Indeed the 6. Canon of the Synod at Chalcedon forbids Ordination absolutely or without a title but this is not of Divine Law or perpetuall but positive and such as admits exceptions The reason of the Cannon was lest by too great a number of Presbyters the Church shall be burdened or the Order it self grow cheap and vile The London Synod excepteth fellowes of Houses in both Universities and Masters of Art living upon their own means and who are shortly to undertake some cure If the Bishop ordain any other 't is at his own perill to keep them from want untill they are provided for Therefore Election that is assignation of a certain place and Ordination are not alway joyn'd together and when they are they are not the same Which is farther proved because they that are translated from place to place must be chosen again but not again ordained which they must be if either Election and Ordination were the same or Ordination a part of Election Besides it will appear that Election was made by men of sundry sorts but Ordination only by Pastors and antiently by Bishops only Hence Paul writing to the first Bishop of the Ephesians gives him Admonition That be lay hands on no man suddenly And the most antient Canons entituled Apostolical require that a Presbyter be ordained by a Bishop but a Bishop not without two or three Bishops Which Custome if seems came from the Hebrews for the Senators of the Great Synedry could not be ordain'd but by three Priests and that by imposition of hands as is noted by the Talmudists Without question this manner was most holy and for the conservation of sound Doctrine most commodious when none was admitted to teach the people but he first receiv'd Allowance from the approved Doctors of the same Faith Pastors therefore ought to ordain Pastors nor is this their office as they are Pastors of this or that Church but as Ministers of the Church Catholick For saith Cyprian There is but one entire Episcopacy whereof every one is a partaker Hence it hath been alwayes held that the Baptism is of force given by a Presbyter without the limits of his peculiar Charge Nor is it materiall whether the Election precede the Ordinarion or be consequent to it for when it precedes it is a conditionate not plenary Election which the Canons of later times have called Postulation Over this Ordination the Highest Power hath an Imperiall inspection and care Justinians Constitutions are extant of the Ordination of Bishops and Clerks and other Lawes of others which prescribe the age and standing of men to be ordained Lawes of good use and fit to be reviv'd for the prevention of the Churches ruine through the rawnesse and ignorance and inexperience of her Teachers according to that out of the old Poët What lost your state founded on so good Rules The publick charge was given to boyes and fooles The fourth member of our distinction Confirmation differs as much from the third as the Church considered by it self differs from the Church publick T is pertinent here that Ezechiah is read to have Confirmed the Priests that Pastors are defended by Lawes and Armes that some Jurisdiction or Audience is attributed to them
collated by Kings Onuphrius is witnesse for the Emperours An Epistle of Pope Pelagius Bishop of Rome is extant which signifies that the Sacred Letters of the most gratious Emperour were come unto his hands requiring certain men to be made Presbyter Deacon and Subdeacon at Centumcells The publick Records of our own Country doe abundantly witnesse the Princes of Holland Zeland and West risia even from the beginning of their Principality have conferred at their pleasure upon fiâ—men the Pastorall Gure of every City and Village except in what places it could be proved that the same right was granted away to others and that Gustome was kept untill the times of the last War These examples although they be not antient are yet sufficient to refell those who have adventured publickly to affirm Pastors untill the very last times of the War were chosen by the People Here might be added were it needfull very many Records of Investitures whereby the Princes bestow upon Noble men their Vassals among other rights also the Collation of Churches And I for my part cannot understand how it comes to passe that the same right doth not still endure to this day whether it be expedient or where and how farre it is expedient is another question The States in my opinion by their pains taken in the Reformation have not deserved to be in worse condition then before they were In the Palatinate the Pastorall Cures are conferred by the Decree of a Senate which by the coÌ„mand and in the name of the Elector hath government of the Churches In the Dominion of Basil the Churches without the City have no power at all in choosing their Pastor whom the Magistrate of the City sends to feed them him they receive with reverence although they never heard him teach In the beginning of the Reformation they were content with this Call alone It is the Saying of Musculus A Christian Pastor ought not to be sollicitous about his Call nor to doubt that it is Christian and lawfull where he is called to preach the Gospell by the pious Magistrate or Prince Wherefore the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches doth not deprive the Powers of this Divine Right Neither have the States themselves ever been of another judgement for when in the year 1586 without the assent of the States a Synod was held the Earle of Lester Governour of these parts to move the States to allow of the Synod declared Nov. 16. That such allowance should be a detriment to no man in respect of that right he challenged in the Institution of Pastors And in the same year Decemb. 9. the Acts of that Synod were admitted by the States with some exceptions whereof this is one That the States Noblemen and City Magistrates and others should retain the right and Custome of Instituting and destituting Pastors and School-masters Let us now give answer to the rest of the Objections used to be brought against the Highest Powers in this regard Some say that certain Kings and Princes have abused the Elections either through a sordid love of gain or through too much favour It is too true but to the determination of the question 't is impertinent for the abuse of right depriveth no man of his right unlesse perhaps a subject by the sentence of his Superiour much lesse is a possible abuse sufficient to the losse of right Then no man shall bee certain of any right whatsoever But to speak the truth there is a greater number of laudable Elections which Kings have made And on the contrary by popular Elections the matter often was brought unto Seditions and slaughters to Sword and fire nor is the Clergy alwayes free from favour and faction no not at this day So that if for fear of incommodities Elections may be overthrown no kind thereof will be able to subsist When Genebrard an enemy to the Regall right had said the Bishops of Rome chosen by the Emperours were monsters of men the contrary was shewed by our side that they were good men at least in some mediocrity but from the Election of the Clergy and People came forth Monstces inâ—eeâ— Moreover the Greatness of the Highest Powers yields not to corruption so easily as private men nor is so obnoxious to unjust desires and importunity of Suters Lastly Ordination which remains with the Pastors and the right of contradicting which is left unto the people shuts up the way if not to all which exceeds Humane Power yet to the worst abuses The Canons are objected too and some Sayings of the Fathers That old Canon which is the 30. in their number entitled Apostolicall speaks of Magistrates not of Emperours and as the Canon next before is oppos'd to nundinations so this to violent intrusions The Canon pertains to them that being not lawfully examin'd and ordain'd invade the Church by force by the Magistrates help and favour So the Parisian Synod disapproves not Election but Ordination by the King nor all the Kings Authority but that which is against the will of the Metropolitan and Comprovinciall Bishops to whom the ordination did belong For King Charibert himself under whom this Synod was holden elects Pascentius to the Bishoprick of Poitiers whom the Comprovincials receiv'd as rightly chosen And if the Canon bear another sense yet is it nothing to the purpose For if it was made by the Kings consent it might be rescinded erther by himself or by other Kings also especially with the sentence of their Peers because no positive Lawes are immutable but if without the Kings consent then neither had that Canon the force of a Law nor could the Regall right be impair'd thereby This is certain since the Kings began to Elect Bishops many Synods have been held in France and not any one of them hath reprehended the Kings in that respect but many have admonished the King to use that study and care in choosing Pastors which was meet Whence it is evident the Gallican Bishops never found any thing in that Election contrary to the Lawes Divine 'T is very improper for our men to produce the Authority of the Nicene second Synod whereby the worshipping of Images was introduced And yet the meaning of the Canons alleged thence is no other then of those we have already answer'd That sharp speech of Athanasius against Constantius is alleged also Who having received most grievous injuries if he had uttered any thing not so generally true as accommodated to those times what marvell is it seeing other Fathers too have let fall many words which will not bear a rigid Examination Yet doth not Athanasius how hot soever in this cause pretend any right Divine but enquires Where is that Canon that a Bishop should be sent out of the Palace He shews what Constantius had done was not Canonicall and rightly for another way of Electing was then in use and that confirmed by the Authority of the Nicene Synod and by the Precepts of Constantine Now although for
just causes it be granted unto Kings to recede from the Canon yet to forsake the Canon with intention of promoting to Episcopacy the favourers of the Arrian party was not the part of a pious Emperour This way of electing is the more justly reprehended if Ordination also being omitted Bishops were obtruded upon the Churches which is very credible to have been done for it was not probable the Orthodox would ordain Arians or such as used Collusion with them Verily not any one of the Fathers hath hitherto been found who said there was any Divine Law to hinder the King from choosing the Pastor It appears the most holy Bishops above mentioned who condiscended to the Election made by Theodosius were of another mind And thus much be spoken of the Highest Powers embracing the true Religion As to the Kings that give no assent to the saving Faith pious Assemblies never made addresse unto them for election of their Pastors For how could they expect defence of the Church from the enemies of the Church And suppose the matter should succeed most happily yet would it be an indecorum that the Affaires of the Church should be judged before the unjust and not before the Saints Yea if Kings that are aliens from the Faith arrogate to themselves any such thing without question they bring upon themselves the greater Judgement Notwithstanding if Infidel Kings will not at all admit any Pastor or Bishop except Elected by themselves and in the mean time leave to the Church the Probation and to other Pastors the Imposition of hands I cannot think it convenient for Christians to refuse men otherwise fit for this only reason because they are commended by Infidels For the good God doth effect his good work even by evill men I am not a man of that confidence that I dare condemn so many Christian Churches in Thrace in Syria in Egypt which doe receive Patriarchs or lesser Bishops from the King of the Turks and that this patience of the Christians is no new thing is shewed by Barlaamus Cyracensis Clearly 't is better to entertain a worthy Pastor adorned with good report of the common People ordained by other Pastors from the hand of a Prince though an unbeliever then to suffer the wast of Churches Esdras we are sure did not decline the office of restoring Gods worship imposed on him by the Pagan King Artaxerxes But that we may return unto our own that is unto Christian Powers for that was aspersed on the by to give others occasion of better thoughts upon this businesse we must advertise the Reader that in all this Treatise we enquire what is lawfull not what is at every time expedient For whether we reflect upon antient or later times we shall see great variety in the manner of election nor only through ages and Provinces but through years and particular Cities So much uncertainty there is in that which the Law Divine hath left uncertain And truly where the question is not of the right but of the best manner of Election 't is marvellous how many things may probably be discoursed on every part Give me Cyprian and those of his time there will be no fear of popular election Give me the Nicene Fathers I would gladly ascribe the election unto Bishops Give me such Emperours as Theodosius Valentinian and Charles the Great there will be no danger in the election Regall or Imperiall But we are fallen into the lees of the Church and after we have with circumspection viewed all things we find nothing but some incommodity is annexed to it Therefore nothing at all can be here prescribed as perpetuall That which is indefinite must have an indefinite Rule Yet if I were in this respect to give my advise the manner of Justinian's times is not displeasing to me with this caution that a Pastor be not obtruded upon the people against their will and also saving the right of the Highest Powers to rescind and make void Elections if any errour be committed pernicious to the Church or Common-wealth Which right not only the French Kings but also the antient Roman Emperours very frequently have used as is most easie to be proved They do much erre who confound this will and pleasure of the H. Powers whereby the Election made is approv'd or disapporv'd with that consent where with the Magistrate of every City according to the Lawes or Canons concur to the Election in the next place to the Clergy and sometimes with the People For here is a wide difference The pleasure of the Highest Powers is over the Election the Magistrates consent is a part of the election That agrees to the Highest Powers as such this to the Magistrates by Positive Law nor properly as Magistrates but as an honoured part of the City Therefore the Election by the Magistrates stayes within the bounds of their City but Emperours and Kings exercise their right not only in Cities which they dwell in and whose Churches they frequent but if they see it needfull through all places of their Dominions Again the Magistrates may be overcome with suffrages the Highest Power cannot Certainly although the election be permitted to others that right of free approbation cannot safely be abdicated by Him that rules in Chiefe Also after Election made the right of removing a certain person from the Ministry of a certain place although it may be in others too ought alwayes to remain in the Highest Power So Solomon ejected Abiathâ—r from being the Priest of God So the Bishops of Rome were more then once deposed by the Imperial Power as Bellarmine himself confesseth The proof whereof is easie For if the Highest Power hath right to interdict any one the City or Province hee must needs have a right also to interdict him the Ministry of this City or Province For this is included in that and in whose Power the whole is in his power the part cannot choose but be Nor only may the Highest Power doe this by way of punishment but by way of caution too to wit if any Pastor be drawn by the People into matter of tumult which perhaps may come to passe without his fault For unlesse the Highest Power could doe this the Common-wealth were not sufficient to secure it selfe The last errour is of those that think it belongs unto the same Person to elect and to remove For the Highest Power may interdict not only publick acts but private too to which it electeth not the Persons namely in negotiation and conduction as above is said when we spake of Jurisdiction and is manifested by Examples For eight or more Roman Bishops it is certain have been depos'd by Emperours sometimes with a Synod sometimes without whereof a good part were elected by the Clergy and people of Rome CHAP. XI Concerning offices to the Church not alwayes necessary IT is of much concernment for the keeping of peace in the Churches vtâ— distinguish accurately between the
a Presbyter is ordain'd the Bishop blessing him and holding his hand upon his head let all the Presbyters also that are present hold their hands upon his head by the Bishops hand For the confirmation hereof I dare not bring that of Paul concerning the laying on of hands of the Presbytery because I perceive Jerom Ambrose and other antient and the Prince of all recent writers Calvin interpret Presbytery in that place not the consistory but the Office to which Timothy was promoted And truly whosoever is versed in the Councils and the writings of the Fathers cannot be ignorant Presbytery as Episcopacy and Diaconacy to bee names of Offices And seeing it is certaine that Paul laid hands on Timothy it seemeth neither necessary nor convenient to joyn fellows with him for an Apostolicall act and Collation of miraculous gifts In the meane time I doe not see how this can be refelled even among the Schoolmen Antisiodorensis long since granted it where Bishops are not Ordination may be rightly made by Presbyters For the things that are observed for order sake admit exceptions So in the antient Councill of Carthage it is permitted Presbyters in case of necessity to reconcile penitents and in another place to lay hands on the Baptized Moreover as we have said above it is doubtfull whether Presbyters that neither have Presbyters under them nor a Bishop over them are neerer to Bishops or more Presbyters For of Timothy also Ambrose argues thus He that had not an other above him was a Bishop And we know to take an instance in the Common-wealth many things are lawfull for a Senate having not a King which to a Senate under a Kings Power are unlawfull For a Senate without a King is as it were a King This is our third Assertion The causes were not light why in this age in some places at least for some time Episcopacy was omitted That the causes are temporary Beza himself seems to acknowledge when he saith He is not the man to think the old order were not be restor'd if the ruines of the Church were once repair'd Of these causes the first might be the penury of men sufficient for so grave an Office for if that were a cause just enough while the Church was yong to omit in many places the Episcopall eminence as we heard Epiphanius say why then at the Churches Rise out of the thickest darknesse might not the same cause take place especially in those places where was found not one of the old Bishops that would yield up himself to truth and open his eyes to see the light held forth Another cause of this omission might be the long and inveterate depravation of the Episcopall Office Socrates of old complains some Episcopacies of his time had exceeded the bounds of Sacerdotall purity and were corrupted into Domination Hierax complains in Pelusiot the Dignity of lenity and meeknesse was advanced into Tyranny Nazianzene complains of the ambition of Bishops and for that reason wisheth if not Episcopacy yet at least that perpetuall right of Cities in retaining Episcopall dignity were changed Would to God there were neither Presidency nor preeminence of place nor tyrannicall power that we might all receive our estimate by vertue alone The Fathers of the Ephesin Synod long since professe themselves afraid lest that under the colours of the Sacred Function should commence the pride of secular power And it is easy to find the like sayings in the African Councils But verily never did Ecclesiastical ambition from the Apostles age unto those times advance to such a hight as it hath done since those times to the memory of our Fathers So that now without cutting off the part wherein the cause lyeth the disease seems almost impossible to be cur'd It is true good things are not to be condemn'd because some men abuse them yet the abuse being turn'd into a custome an intermission of the things themselves is not infrequent The Mosaicall Serpent might have remained without Superstition if the thing it self were considered but Ezechiah respecting the grown vice of the people that he might take away the Superstition took away the Serpent I am loth to say that the name and eminence Episcopall by their fault to whom it had fallen had lost all its reverence and was come into the odium of the common people to whom even when they are in errour somewhat sometimes is to be yielded The Romans being evill intreated by the Tarquins took an oath they would no more endure a King at Rome A third cause may be added that in those most infestious times the Preachers of the truth being hated for the truths sake were obliged to acquit themselves not only from the crime of ambition but from all suspition too which when by taking away the Episcopall dignity they sollicitously endeavour'd for all this they escaped not the calumny of their adversaries What reproaches should they not have heard had the change of Doctrine been joyned with the acquisition of preferment I will adde one cause more why in the beginning of the Repurgation Episcopacy was not very necessary God had raised up excellent men of great wit of great learning of great esteeme both among their own and the neighbouring people few indeed in number but such as were able to beare the weight of many businesses Their high reputation amongst all easily supplyed the defect of Episcopacy But if we will with Zanchy-confesse the plaine truth none were indeed more truely Bishops than they whose Authority although this was not their design prevailed even to the overthrow of Bishops Nor is that here to be omitted which we have said already more than once The Ecclesiasticall Government for the most part receives some impression from the Civill In the Roman Empire the Bishops were correspondent to the Dukes the Metropolitans to the Presidents the Patriarchs or Primats to the Vicars or Deputies of the Emperour What marvell is it then if people more accustomed to an Optimacy than Monarchy would have the Church affairs committed rather to the Clergy than the Bishop And these are the causes wherefore I think the Churches may be excus'd which have no Bishops whilst yet they abstaine from a disapprobation of the most Sacred order and withall retaine what Beza judged in no wise to be omitted That was Essentiall saith he which by the perpetuall ordainance of God hath been is and shall be necessary that in the Presbytery some one both in place and dignity the first oversee and governe the action by that right which God hath given him Let us come unto those Assessors whom in many places we see joyned to the Pastors out of the people by an annuall or bienniall Office They call them Presbyters when yet they neither Preach the Gospell to the people nor exhibite the Sacraments Concerning them this is our judgement First we say Those temporary Presbyters are strangers to the Apostolicall and antient Church nor have I seen any that
the Rulers is supplyed by the reverence of those that obey To return to the Christian discipline that the Institutes thereof were never reckoned as Lawes Divine appears by this because 't is not in the power of man to give a Dispensation or Indulgence then but it hath been alwayes in the power of Bishops with respect had to the life of the Penitents either to prolong or shorten the time of their penance Yea and generally men in danger of death were received to Communion Which the Nicene Synod calls an antient and Canonicall Law which agrees also with the custome of the Essences in Josephus And among those that by Divine Law are forbidden to be partakers of holy things to wit the impenitent some are by the Canons kept only from the Communion of their own Province others the Clergies Communion being interdicted them are admitted to the Communion of Laicks and for the same crime a Lay-man is Excommunicated a Clerk put out of office Besides Austin teaches that Excommunication must be forborn if the contagion of sin hath invaded and o'respread the multitude Which exception were not to be admitted were Excommunication grounded only on Divine Law It appears therefore many things were added out of Humane consent which as long as they were destitute of Imperiall Authority had not only no force of compelling but saving by consent obliged no man unlesse perhaps by that Naturall Law which commanâ—s offences to be avoided In the same manner as the Canons themselves did the Judgements given according to the Canons oblige every one for as to the debate of meaner businesses the Laicks were appointed by Paul the Apostle's counsell for composing of differences so in the more weighty affairs the Clergy were the Judges unto which judgements pertains that admonition proceeding from naturall equity Against an Elder that is a man of approved faith an accusation is not to berecerved without two or three witnesses But after the Emperours embraced Christianisme then at length to Pastors as men that perform'd a publick office was some part of Jurisdiction given This was threefold by ordinary Law by consent of parties by delegation By ordinary Law the Bishops were allowed to judge of things pertaining to Religion The first that seemeth to have made this Constitution was Valentinian the first whose rescript Ambrose cites Other Emperours did the like Justinian by his Constitution exempts Ecclesiasticall affaires from the Cognizance of the Civill Judges and leaves them to the Bishops In other causes both Clearks and Laicks pleaded not before the Bishops but by their own consent Which Jurisdiction by consent the Bishops receiv'd from Constantine with so full a Right that the Cause which the Bishops had once decided should be carryed on no further that is there should be no appeal from the Bishops sentence Afterward by the Synod of Chalcedon it was made unlawfull for Clerks against Clerks to run forth to the Secular Tribunal but first the action was to be examined before him whom by the advice of the Bishops the parties should have chosen And yet if the Clerks did otherwise the secular Judge wanted not Jurisdiction but the Clerks were lyable to the penalties of the Canon First of all the Emperours Justinian circumscribed the rights of the Secular Judges and commanded that Clergy-men whether by Lay or Clergy in Civill Causes should only be sued before the Bishop yet so that the Bishop might remit the difficult Controversies to the Civill Judges and he might also appeal to the Civill Judge that would not rest in the judgement of the Bishop But the punishmen of the Clergy for Crimes not meerly Ecclesiasticall at that time and long after remained in the hand of the Civill Judges That which wee have said of the nonappeal from the Sentence of the Bishop chosen Judge by consent of parties the same Arcadius also Honorius and Theodosius doe shew in the Epistle to Theodorus Manlius Praetorian Praefect Let the Bishops sentence be firm for all that have choâ—en to be heard by Priests and wee command the same reverence to be given to their judgement which must be given to yours from whom it is not lawful to appeal For from the Pratorian Prafects was no appeal but if any one said he was oppressed 't was lawfull for him to Petition the Emperour Whence the Praetorian Praefects are said to Judge in the Sacred place that is the Imperiall which may be as rightly said of Bishops judging by consent of Parties The same right is attributed to the Patriarks to whose cognizance the causes Ecclesiasticall were deferr'd which with Inferiour Bishops could find no end Against the Sentence of these Prelates saith Justinian speaking of the Patriarks there is no place for an Appeal by the Constitution of our Ancestors The third kind of Jurisdiction wee have called that which ariseth from delegation whether of the Highest or the Inferiour Power in this kind of Causes was alwayes granted an Appeale unto the Emperour if Judgement were given by the Emperours command or to the Judge whosoever he was if by the Judges Precept In the name of Jurisdiction we comprehed the right of citing Witnesses of imposing on them an Oath and binding the party overcome by Sentence unlesse Appeal were made upon whom also execution was done not truly by the hand of the Bishop that was not becomming but by the hand of the Civill Judge Hence was the Jurisdiction properly called Audience because the Judge himselfe executed not the Sentence Wherefore above that which the Pastors and the Church had by Divine right and by the meer Canons much was added by Humane Law and the grant of the Highest Powers The people now had not only right to avoid an unfaithfull Pastor but such a Pastor by vertue of a Sentence pronounc'd against him lost his Pastorall right and whatsoever he ascribed to it and if he attempted any thing against the Sentence was punisht with relegation So the Pastor now had not only right to deny the Sacraments and every one to deny familiarity to the brother of an irregular life but it was also unlawfull for him to approach unto the Church Nor ought we to wonder this Right by Christian Emperours was given to Christian Pastors when the same indulged thus much to the Jewes that none should be admitted into their Sect nor be reconciled to it without consent of their Primates And so the Pagan Emperours of old as Ulpian saith Imposed such Commands upon the Jewes which might not offend their Superstition but the Christian Emperours gave them this farther privilege that the Masters of their Synagogues and other Presidents of their Law were free from personall and civill offices and if two Jewes by agreement referr'd their Controversies to the Jewes the Judges should execute their Sentence So much favour did the Christian Emperours bestow upon the Jewes for the beginning Truth had among them and for hope of their future
Election inferrs thus Yet I will not thence conclude that the right of electing Bishops is to be reduced to the promiscuous Votes of the common people for whether it be better that the Bishop be design'd at the meeting of the whole Church or by the suffrages of a few no right Constitution can be prescribed to all Churches for severall Countries have severall Laws Customes and Institutes If any in whom the right is abuse it by Tyranny they are compelled into order by the Holy Magistrate or the right of designing Ministers may be transferr'd from them to others for it is sufficient that some Elders performe that office of Electing upon command of the King or Magistrate by the advise and Counsell of men who understand what the function of a Bishop is what is the condition of that Church or People over which a Pastor is to be appointed who also can judge of the endowments the learning and manners of every one By this right Justinian as we have said Constituted a manner of Electing somewhat receding from the former usage and the antient Canons by this right after the Nicene Canon were many Bishops elected by the Clergy and the People The Lawes of Charles the Great and other Kings are extant containing divers wayes of Electing so that Bucer said most truly The form of Election is prescribed by pious Princes Let us now consider whether the Highest Power it self may make Election the question is not whether it ought to make it nor whether it be alwayes expedient to doe so but whether if it doe make Election it commit any offence against the Law Divine We say with the excellent Marsilius Patavinus The Law-giver or Prince is not by any Law of God prohibited from the Institution Collation or Distribution of Ecclesiasticall offices Whosoever affirm the contrary doe accuse of impiety innumerable pious Princes of antient and of this age which truly is a point of great temerity when no Divine Law can be produced to prohibit it as hath been abundantly by others and by us in some part demonstrated Although this might suffice for whatever is not circumscrib'd by Divine Law is within the sphere of the Highest Power yet for the desending of our sentence both reasons and examples are in readinesse The first reason is taken hence that all actions even those that naturally belong to others not having causes determined by nature we see are rightly exercised by the H. Power Naturally men choose teachers for their children and give them Guardians sick persons make use of what Physician they please Merchants elect the Curators of their Company Yet in many places Guardianship is appointed by Law alone or the will of the Magistrates Physicians are constituted by publick Order and Informers of Youth too with interdiction of others from the practice of those faculties and to the Commanies of Merchants are fit Curators also appointed by the Highest Power without blame of any any But if this right be competent to the Highest Power over those things which did belong to every one much more over those things that belong unto the People because the power of the people is devolved upon it as all men know that have any knowledge of the Lawes That sometimes there may be just causes why the H. Power should challenge to it self the Election of Pastors no wise man will deny For often errours introduced into the Church against the word of God cannot be rooted out by other means often there is no other way to avoid Schism often the suffrages of the Clergy are disturb'd with factions popular election with seditions whereof are extant many examples even of the purer times Adde in the last place that the times are now and then so boisterous that the King will hardly keep the Crown upon his head except hee have a care the Pastors may be most obedient and faithfull to him Verily all Histories doe witnesse how dearly the German Emperours paid for their abdication of this Imperiall Right That we may come to Examples it hath been shewed afore that before the Mosaicall Law and afterward among the Nations without Judaea Kings themselves enjoyed the Priesthood the Divine Law not then forbidding it at which time there can be no doubt the Priesthood might also have been committed by them to others as we read the Pontifs and Flamens were created by the Kings of Rome But among the Hebrew people after Moses Law no man except of Aarons family could be admitted to the office of a Priest nor to the service of the Temple unlesse he were a Levit. Hence is Jeroboam justly blam'd for choosing Priests who were not Levits for the Law did not allow it nor was it in the King to command Sacrifices to be offered in any place but the accustomed which after David was Jerusalem Other Functions or the places for them the King might assigne to the Priests and Levits So were some Levits appointed by David for preaching others for singing And that there should be Singers with Harps and other Instruments was God's precept by the Prophets as the application of persons to the severall offices is every where attributed to David under the name of King and after David to Solomon and Jehoshaphat the King not the Prophet by name electeth Priests and Levits whom he might send forth to the Cities of Juda to instruct them The very same thing that is here debated For as some Fathers were of opinion the right of blood in the Moisaicall Law is correspondent to the Imposition of hands in the Christian Law As then the Hebrew King may apply certain persons to a certain office and place but only such as were of Aarons family and Levits so the Christian King rightly makes a Presbyter or Bishop of a certain City but of them which are ordain'd or to be ordain'd And so did Nehemia's Lieutenant to the Persian King leave some Levits in the particular Cities others hee called forth unto Jerusalem Yea the High Priest attained not that dignity by Succession but Election of the great Synedry yet confined unto certain families which Election seemeth to have been the regall right when the Kings reigned the most learned of the Hebrews Maimonides hath observed But let us proceed with the Christians Before Constantine no man will wonder that no Christian Pastors were elected by the Emperours when the Emperours either were enemies to the Church or had it in contempt and accounted it not worthy of their care Constantine gave the force of a Law to the Nicene Canon of Election to be made by Bishops other Emperours after him did the like either by renewing the Canon or not abrogating of it And 't is manifest this manner of Election was long in use the Empire being of greater extent than that the Emperours diligence could provide for all the Churches Notwithstanding this it was lawfull for the Emperours if they pleased to Elect by themselves For seeing it
the Primacy that method was alter'd by a Councill providing that merit not seniority should Create a Bishop ordained by the judgement of many Priests to the end an unworthy person might not unadvisedly usurp the place and so become a scandall to many Hee saith the primacy of Timothy among the Presbyters is acknowledged by the Apostle Whereas some learned men would hence set up a certain circular praesidency herein they are opposed by all the antient Monuments that are extant nor doe the words of Ambrose help them for receding is all one with dying or departing And whereas the Courses of the Priests are brought hither to establish this Interpretation any one may see with half an eye how impertinent it is when those Courses make nothing toward presidency which was alwaies in the High-Priest and other Chief of their Classes But the alleged Writer his meaning is that Seniority in age or rather in Function was valued in the making of Bishops Wherein although none of the Antients be on his side yet if wee understand him of certain Churches what hee saith is not incredible For also the Archimandrits or chiese of Hermitages at the Commencement of Monachism were elected according to that Order To believe him of all Churches Jeroms testimony of the Alexandrian Custom will not permit The same Writer concerning Timothy Timothy now Created Bishop he institutes by epistle how he ought to govern the Church Concerning Titus Titus the Apostle Consecrated an Apostle and so admonisheth him to be sollicitous for the well ordering of the Church No other are the judgements concerning Titus Timothy of Epiphanius Eusebius Chrysostom Oecumenius Theodoret Theophilact Primasius as by producing their words hath been demonstrated by others Yea the Oecumenicall Synod of Chalcedon saith After S. Timothy untill now have been made xxvii Bishops all ordained in Ephefus For Antiquity did not believe what of late some with confidence aflirm that they who were Evangelists could not be created Bishops As long as they walked about the Provinces they did the office of Evangelists but when beholding in one place a plentifull harvest they thought fit to cherish it with their longer Presence doubtlesse being presidents to the Presbytery they performed all offices Episcopall Upon which reason Antiquity believed that the Apostles also were truly Bishops of certain Cities namely in those places where they made longer stay or to speak more properly where they sate by which word Luke hath very emphaticully expressed Paul's abode with the Corinthians Besides Timothy and Titus we read of others advanced by the Apostles into the Episcopall throne Concerning Evodius thus to the Antiochians writes Ignatius He first by the Apostles hands was promoted to our presidency What presidency that is is not left doubtfull by Ignatius who every where distinguisheth the Bishop from the Presbyters and preferrs him above them You must doe nothing without the Bishop but be subject to his Presbytery And in another place The reverend Presbytery being dear to God is so fitted to the Bishop as the strings to the Harp And again in another place What is the Bishop but the Prince and the Presbyters but his Counsellours This is that Ignatius who saw Christ in the flesh who lived with the Apostles who next after Evodius was Bishop in the Church of Antioch A question may be made when as their office who were over the Presbyters by a certain perpetuall dignity is so antient and approv'd by Christ himself by what name was that Honour entitled before the common name of Bishops began peculiarly to be ascrib'd unto this Presidence which as Jerom thinks began about the viii year of Nero. The antient Fathers are of opinion that those Princes of the Presbyters were stil'd Apostles And truly there remain in Cyprian and other Authours not a few obscure prints of this locution Yea Paul himself when he saith Hee was nothing lesse than the chiefe of the Apostles seems to intimate there were some other Apostles of lesser mark That the name of Angel was antiently given to him who afterward began to be called Bishop the Apocalyps evinceth For it appears the word was taken as of common use because those Letters are popularly written and the Mystery of the Starrs is explained by the appellation of Angels as being very obvious but the most simple and plain denomination seems to have been that of President for by this name Justin Martyr calls the Bishop in his second Apology Another question may be By what example Episcopall Eminence was brought into the Churches It is certain there were degrees of Priests among the Heathens that the Custom was not new to the Grecians and such as sprang from Greece we learn by the most antient discipline of the Druids One saith Coesar is President to the Druids who hath amongst them the chief Authority And how antient the Emmence of Mother Cities in matters of Religion is we learn out of Thucydides where he speaks of the Corcyreans a Colony of the Corinthians upon which passage the old Scholiast notes It was the Custome to receive High Priests from the Metropolis Strabo names one Priest of the Catti who was we make no doubt the highest and among the Burgundians the greatest Priest is mention'd by Marcellinus This custome God himself approved by the legall Constitution of the Judaical Republick when hee set up One with highest Authority over all the Priests Who although in some acts hee was a Type of Christ yet the whole Institution of this Pontificate is not to be referr'd to this end alone This eminence of one Priest served for Order also as well as the Regall Power which did also in its way adumbrate Christ Although then this example might suffice yet to me the Constitution of the Christian Church seemeth not so much expressed according to the pattern of the Temple at Jerusalem as of the Synagogues For the Synagogues were in many places without any Commanding Power as neither the Church of Christ hath any by it self Adde hereunto that wheresoever the Apostles came they found Synagogues well enough ordered even from the times if the Babylonian dispersion which if they would receive the Faith of Christ as to them the Gospel was Preached before others there was no cause why they should depart from that Government that the experience of many ages did commend nor was it any burden to the Gentiles in such a matter to accommodate themselves to the Jewish institutions Now in every Synagogue it is certaine there was one who by the Greekish Jews was call'd the Ruler of the Synagogue which name occurs frequently both in the Gospell and the Acts and every where the Prince of the Synagogue is designed by it Only one place is excepted where the word being taken in a larger sense in one Synagogue are named more Rulers that is both he who as the Hebrew Masters teach us was the Prince who answers to our Bishop
certaine neither the Apostles nor the Church had any coactive power granted to them I come unto the name of Presbyters which many think in the new Testament was given to the Assessors of Pastors which is not clear to me In the Testament I find three significations of this word â—one which pertains to age as when the Presbyters or Elders are oppos'd to the younger another which belongs to Power and Empire as when there is mention of those that sate in the great Synedry or in the lesse a third which agrees to the Preachers of the Gospell a fourth I doe not find A question may be made why the Apostles call'd the Pastors ordained by them by the name of Presbyters Was it because scarce any other but old men were called to that Office or because in the Synagogue also the Masters by an excellency had that appellation or which I like as well by a similitude taken from the Jewish Magistrates For Christ himself in the constitution of his Church that he might shew himself a King and withall by degrees might abolish the hope of an earthly Kingdome composed his Church though destitute of all externall power to a certaine Image of the Judaicall Kingdome and so erected the minds of his Disciples to the hope of a Kingdome Celestiall There was one King among the Hebrew people He also acknowledgeth himself to bee a King In that Kingdome were twelve Princes of their Tribes Christ constituted to himself so many Apostles and that it might not be doubted whether he had respect promiseth to them twelve thrones whereon they should judge the twelve tribes of Israel In the Kingdome were LXX Senators of the Great Synedry so many Evangelists are constituted by Christ The third dignity in the Kingdome was of the City Judges called Presbyters or Elders in the Church also the Presbyters follow the Apostles and Evangelists in the third place The chief of those Judges were called Bishops or Overseers and so in the Church the Princes of the Presbyters are the Bishops Lastly They that waited upon those Judges were Deacons or Ministers so are they called in the Church who are Ordained below the Presbyters What the Office of Presbyters is in the Christian Church the Apostles in sundry places teach us Paul having sent for the Presbyters of Ephesus to Miletum gives them to understand that they were made Overseers over the flock to feed the Church of God James biddeth the sick call for the Presbyters of the Church to pray over them and anoint them with Oyl in the name of the Lord. Peter exhorts the Presbyters being himself a Co-Presbyter that is a Colleague in the Office It appears therefore they were Pastors Neither were they otherwise ordain'd but by imposition of hands as of Timothy it is recorded In other places where without any character Presbyters are barely mention'd to understand any other Presbyters but those who in so many places are most clearly describ'd is the part of a temerarious conjector unlesse the Context compell us to depart from the certain and receiv'd signification In all the new Testament only one sentence of Paul is extant which is speciously brought to confirme those Presbyters non-Pastors Let the Presbyters or Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour especially they who labour in the word and Doctrine From this word especially is infer'd that there were in that time certaine Presbyters who ruled only and did not labour in the word and Doctrine But first if that were true at least somewhere else would appeare this new kind of Presbyters never spoken of before by what Author by what occasion it began as the Originall of Deacons is recorded and not so on the By and in passage in a single place where the speech was not concerning Offices Ecclesiasticall this necessary part of Ecclesiasticall Government should not I say so slightly be insinuated Againe the Fathers next to the Apostles times would have told us somewhat of it at least the Greek Fathers who could not be ignorant of their own tongue would have left us this Interpretation which some suppose to follow from the very series of the words Now when as before the last age not one of the Interpreters hath taken the words of Paul in that sense we have reason to see whether they admit not another interpretation more consonant to other places of the Scripture Let us then consider the scope of the Apostle He would have double honour given to Presbyters What hee means by honour may be understood by the words afore Honour Widows Where to honour is nothing else but to maintaine them honestly for his will is that the Widows should be honour'd who are Widows indeed that is as appears by the opposition such as have not believing kindred by whose help they may be relieved for if they have such he forbids to be burthensome to the Church After he had finished his discourse of susteining Widows he shews the Presbyters also must be supplyed with honest maintenance That this is noted by the word honour the reason annexed proveth For it is written Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne. This same testimony of Scripture he had produced elsewhere to the same sense who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges who planteth a Vineyard and eateth not of the fruit thereof or who feedeth a flock and eateth not of the milk of the flock Say I these things as a man or saith not the Law the same For it is written in the Law of Moses Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne. And afterward If we have sowen unto you spirituall things is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnall things Well is it noted upon the place we handle by Chrysostome Jerom Ambrose Calvin also and Bullinger that the Apostle here speaks of supply of maintenance necessaries That our Assessors should be susteined by the Churches allowance is not seen at this time nor was ever seen Neither is it credible that the Apostle who every where spares the Churches burdened enough with poor people would lay an unnecessary burden on them Wherefore if ever in this place especially those Assessors had been unseasonably mention'd where a discourse of maintenance is commenced The words of Paul have been commodiously interpreted many wayes by others The plainest Interpretation is Maintenance is due indeed to all Presbyters that rule the Church that is feed the Lords flock but especially to them that wholy neglecting their private affairs apply themselves to the only care of propagating the Gospel and spare no labour in it Here then are not set down two sorts of Presbyters but it is declared that the labour of all is not equall All acknowledge even Beza too that the word translated to labour notes not every labour but that which is most painfull In
and then the Pastors which Office and name remains in the Christian Church and the Elemosynaries which are like unto our Deacons Wherefore in that one place the Pastors joyned to the chiefe of the Synagogue are call'd the Rulers So in the new Testament often the High Priest with those next unto him are called the chief Priests and in Jeremy the antients of the Priests These Rulers of the Synagogues had others over them which were called Primates in either Palestine one and others in other Provinces And thus much be spoken by the way to illustrate the originall of Bishops Our fifth Assertion is Episcopacy hath been the spring-head whence many commodities have flowed into the Church The History of all times proclaims it but I will againe use him for my witnesse who in all Antiquity was the least friend of Bishops that is Jerom In the whole world saith he it was decreed that for the taking away of Schisms and divisions one being elected from among the Presbyters should be set above the rest In another place The Churches safety consisteth in the dignity of the chiefest Priest that is the Bishop to whom if there be not given a Superiour power over all the rest there will be made so many Schisms in the Church as there be Priests Nor is it any thing else which Cyprian doth so frequently inculcate Whence have Schisms and Heresies arisen and doe still arise in the Church but while the Bishop which is one and the Governour of the Church by the proud presumption of some men is contemned And elsewhere Heresies have no other Rise and Schisms no other beginning but hence that obedience is not given to Gods Priest nor is one Priest and Judge for the time in the steed of Christ elected Not only single Assemblies by the presidence of one were guarded against Schisms but as the same Cyprian saith The Universall Church was coupled together by the chaine of Priests linked to one another and united For the whole Christian world was preserv'd in concord by commerce of those Letters which were call'd formate And so much for Episcopall eminence To proceed On behalf of the equality of Pastors we have these things to say not repugnant to those afore First The Episcopall eminence is not of Divine precept This is prov'd enough because the contrary is not prov'd For Christ is no where read to have commanded it Indeed he approv'd it in the Apocalyps but it follows not Because he did approve it Therefore he did command it Episcopacy is of Apostolicall institution because it appears in some Churches Bishops were ordained or approved by the Apostles but the Apostles never commanded that such Bishops should be in every Church By which distinction we separate Jeroms case from the case of Aerius Jerom saith The Bishops became greater than the Presbyters by custome rather than by the Lords dispose As also Austin Episcopacy is greater than Presbytery according to the titles of honour which the Church hath used When the Fathers speak of Custome they exclude not Apostolicall institution yea as Austin saith What is observ'd in the Universall Church nor is instituted by Councils but hath bin alwaies kept is most rightly believ'd to have been deliver'd by no lesse Authority than Apostolicall But as we have elsewhere said it is not presently of Divine precept whatsoever is instituted by the Apostles for many things are instituted with reservation of a Liberty to make a change That the people should with a clear voice say Amen at the end of prayers That the Preacher should be uncover'd was a Constitution in the Apostolicall Church Which in many places now we see is not observed Moreover the Apostles so appointed Bishops that they left certaine Churches without Bishops as Epiphanius acknowledges There was need of Presbyters and Deacons for by these two the Ecclesiasticall Offices may be compleat but where none was found worthy of the Episcopacy the place remain'd without a Bishop but where was need and they were worthy of the Episcopacy Bishops were ordained Those Churches therefore as Jerom speaks were govern'd by the common Counsell of the Presbyters This we shall adde in the second place It was not universally observ'd that one Bishop should be over every City Of the Apostles time we suppose it is already prov'd And afterward more Bishops than one were in the same City in imitation of the Jews who had as many chief Rulers as they had Synagogues but in one City often times were many Synagogues or as Philo cals them Proseuche places of prayer So at Jerusalem was one Synagogue of Libertines another of the Cyrenians a third of the Alexandrians And at Corinth about the same time were named two chief Rulers of Synagogues Crispus and Sosthenes Epiphanius declares it was instituted first at Alexandria that in the whole City should be but one Bishop At last in the VIII Nicene Canon we see it was defin'd That there should not be two Bishops in any City yet so that withall it appears the Canon was sometimes dispenc'd with For the Canon permits that Bishops returning from the Sect of the Cathari to the Catholick Church should retein Episcopall honour next to the Catholick Bishop So the Ephesin Synod after the Election of Theodorus grants that honour to Eustachius as appears by an Epistle to the Synod of Pamphilia and in the conference before Marcellinus the Catholicks offer the same unto the Donatists if they would returne unto Communion Every one of us receiving an associate of his honour may sit with greater eminence the peregrine Bishops sitting by as a Collenge Valerius also in the Church of Hippo assumed Austin to himselfe Which although Austin saith 't was done through ignorance of the Canons appears yet to have been a thing not unheard of afore much lesse believ'd repugnant to the Law Divine Moreover the Episcopall Chairs in many Cities were often void not for some months only but many years together all which time The Churches that I may againe speak with Jerom were govern'd by the Common Counsell of the Presbyters or as Ignatius saith The Presbyters fed the flock untill God should shew them one to governe them To the Roman Clergy we see Cyprian wrote many Letters and the Clergy answer'd him concerning all things pertaining to the State of the Church Furthermore all the antients doe confesse there is no act except Ordination so proper to the Bishop but it may be exercis'd by the Presbyter Chrysostome and Jerom are very clear in this point And although in the judgement of these Fathers the right of Ordination is denyed Presbyters which may be seen in the constitutions of many Synods partly Universall partly topicall yet why may not this be understood that the Presbyters could ordaine none in contempt of the Bishop That they did in some sort concurre to Ordinations with the Bishop seems to appeare by the IV. Synod of Carthage When