Selected quad for the lemma: hand_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
hand_n bishop_n church_n presbyter_n 4,517 5 10.4419 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A52993 Palæmon, or, The grand reconciler composing the great difference and disputes about church-government and discovering the primitive government of churches, built upon the Word of God, and the practice of the apostles / compiled by one who labours for the peace of the church. T. N. 1646 (1646) Wing N77; ESTC R30734 20,310 32

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

discipline of the Church were exercised upon them they should not communicate with the people of God till the Church were satisfied of their correction and amendment This also would give satisfaction to the tender consciences of those good Christians who like to those in St. Cpyrians time are scandalized when they see them admitted to the Communion who live without any the least amendment in a constant practice and profession of sinne There being then so much good Cypr. Ep. 551. and the prevention of so much ill contained in the Discipline of penance let it be the hearty desire of all knowing and well-affected Christians towards the State and Church that the Discipline commended to us by our Saviour and practised by the Apostles may be with all care and speed reformed and brought againe into use SECT IX HAving thus unfolded the nature of that power wherewith Christ invested his Apostles and from them derived it to his Church and that is the power of the Keyes whereof there be two appendixes Excommunication and the Discipline of Penance Mr. Th. proceeds to the discovery of the other part of the Churches Office and that is the constituting and ordaining of Ministers of which there be some vestigia or footsteps left for our imitation in the holy Scriptures as when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away Act. 13.3 Act. 14.23 1 Tim. 4.14 Neglect not the gift that was given thee by Prophecie with the imposition of the hands of the Presbyterie which words are expounded 2 Tim. 1.6 by imposition of my hands so likewise 1 Tim. 5.22 To which we may adde the choice of Matthias Act. 1.23 and that passage in the choice of the seven Deacons Act. 6.3 Looke ye out among you seven men of honest report and verse 5. and 6. They chose Steven and the rest and set them before the Apostles and when they had prayed they laid their hands upon them Which place is alledged by St. Cyprian to prove that the people have an interesse and ought to have a share in the ordination of Ministers And that this was the custome and practice of the Primitive Church to publish the names of those persons who were to be ordained that so the people discussing their lives and manners might by their approbation ratifie the ordination of such whom they knew to be men well gifted and of an holy conversation This appeares by a remarkable passage in the life of Alexander Severus by an excellent saying of St. Cyprian to this purpose Ordinationes Sacerdotum sub populi assistentis conscientia fieci Cypr. and by the 6. Canon of the Councell of Chalcedon By all which it is evident that the people did not nominate but onely approve by their common suffrage and consent the persons who were to be ordained And that the Bishop did advise with his Presbyters about the nomination of those who were to be ordained Deacons or Ministers this is cleare by those words of St. Cyprian Ep. 54. where he excuseth himselfe to his Clergy that he had ordained Saturus and Optatus alone without their consent and approbation By this we may collect what was practised in that age of the Church First there was a nomination or publication of the persons names to the people Secondly upon their knowledge and approbation of the persons to be ordained there followed imposition of hands wherein consisted the accomplishment of the whole work which is therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek Concerning the Ordination of Bishops onely this may be averred out of Saint Hierome who hath recorded that in the Church of Alexandria the Presbyters were wont to choose a Bishop out of their owne Classis or rank yet we must not deny that the first constitution of a Bishop there who was Hanania was made by Marke the Euangelist as we may see in Eutichius lately set forth by Mr. Selden And it is evident out of many other Authors that they nominated the person to be approved of by the people and to be ordained by the neighbour Bishops This too is maintained by Saint Ambrose in his Comment upon Ephes 4.2 Where wee must understand by those words Multorum Sacerdotum judicium Non ordo sed meritum creabat Episcopum multorum Sacerdotum judicio constitutum c. Vi. Can. 19. Concil Antioc as well the judgement of the Presbyters by whom the Bishop was elected as of the Bishops of other Churches by whom he was ordained and with whom he was to preserve the unity of the Church And unlesse three Bishops at the least were present it was not usuall to ordaine one Thus without consent of the Bishops all proceedings of the Clergy and people were quite disabled and to no purpose in the Primitive times And although the Bishops in some Churches usurped the power of Ordination of Ministers without the consent of their Presbyters Vi. Chrys Hom. 2. in 1 Tim. It. Hieron in Ep. ad Euagr. however it is manifest by the joynt consent of the Fathers who witnesse that the Presbytery was a Bench assistant to the Bishop without advice whereof nothing of moment was done or acted by the practice of the Apostles that the Presbyters ought to have a share with the Bishop in the imposition of hands 1 Tim. 4.14 2 Tim. 16. Timothy received imposition of hands from Saint Paul and the Presbyters of Autiochia This last Thesis may be confirmed by the authority of Saint Cyprian who oft expresses himselfe in this particular That he would never ordaine any without the advice of his Presbyters and consent of the people which advice implyes that they concurred with him in the Ordination of Ministers And as for imposition of hands that the Presbyters also conjoyned with the Bishops in this it is evident by the 22. Episcopus sine Concilio Clericorum suorum Clericos non ordinet ita ut civium assensum testimonium quaerat Canon of the fourth Councell of Carthage and by the aforesaid Epistle of Firmilianus Bishop of Cesarea Cappadocia as also by Ignatius his Epistle to Hero By all these authorities it evidently appeares that the Presbyters concurred with the Bishops in the act of Ordination assisting them by their prayers gracing them by their presence and countenancing their act by a joint consent in their Suffrages The like is affirmed in the fourth Councell of Carthage c. 3. where it is provided and appointed that when the Bishop giveth imposition of hands the Presbyters also shall impose theirs by his which they did to argue their consent to what was done by the Bishop In which act the people had no share And this joynt act of the Bishop and Presbyters in laying their hands upon the heads of the Ministers signified the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost which they then prayed might light upon them who are to be ordained As for the constituting and ordaining of Bishops the advice of
their Quarters SECT I. TO illustrate the truth of these foure Positions and withall to prove that the Churches were at first governed by Bishops and Presbyters he begins with the first Church the Church of Jerusalem Mother of all Churches from whence the sound of the Gospel went out into all the world This Church was under the charge of Iames the sonne of Alpheus one of the Apostles and his Presbyters No doubt by the consent and appointment of the other Apostles providing for the Church there before their departure into other coa●●s This is comirmed too by Ignatius Clem. Alexandrinus This appeares by many pregnant passages of the Scriptures as Galar 1.18 Gal. 2.9 Act. 15.1 13 19. Gal. 2.12 All these places prove that Saint Iames had the charge of that Church as being the chiefe of that first Councel held there of which we reade Acts 15. and * And when James Peter and John c. nominated by S. Paul in that fore-named Epistle to the Gal. 2.9 before the rest of the Apostles some of whose names wee finde there recorded To denote his preheminencie and precedencie in that place And that he had Presbyters for his Assistants appeares by the second verse of the fore-cited Chapter of the Acts. ch 21. v. 19. where we find that S. Paul at his last comming to Jerusalem Acts 15. went in to Iames where all the Elders were present to advise with him that had the care of that Church about the great businesse then in hand how to behave himselfe towards those of the Circumcision who beleeved Of the Colledge of Presbyters at Jerusalem and of their concurrence and assistance with S. Iames in the Government of that Church we have two unreprovable Arguments in the Acts of the Apostles Act. 11.30 Act. 15.4 6 22 23. SECT II. THis pattern thus setled in Jerusalem the Apostles followed in other Churches which they converted to the Faith by preaching to them the Word of Life These Churches were first founded in Cities as appears by * Tert. lib. de Praescrip c. 20. Ac proinde Ecclesias apud unainquamque civitatem condiderunt Tertullian which is most worthy our observation For because they could not bestow their paines equally in all places reason required they should labour most to plant the faith of Christ in the most populous From whence it was propagated through the Townes and Countryes which were adjacent to those Cities which therefore in time became and were called the Territories Parishes or Dioceses of such or such Churches Now the form of Government estated by S. Paul over these Churches is pointed out to us Act. 14.23 where we reade that Paul and Barnabas ordained them Presbyters in every * Viz. in Lystra and Derbe Cities of Lyconia and in Iconium Church i. e. Colledges Bodies or Companies of Presbyters to order with common advice and joynt consent the Churches planted by them in severall Cities This appeares too by the 20. of Act. 17. where we find that there was a Bench of Elders at Ephesus for which Paul sent to Miletus Philip 1. Thus in the Church of Philippi you shall find that the Apostle directed his Epistle to the Bishops and Deacons there which must be to the Colledge of Presbyters next above the Order of Deacons So when the Apostle writeth to the Thestalonians 1 Thes 12. And we beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord The multitude whereof he speaketh is to be understood like wise of the body or company of the Presbyters And in all Church Writers you shall find continuall remembrance of these Presbyters whensoever there is speech of Mother Churches in Mother Cities Now the Presbyters being styled in the holy Scriptures by the name of Bishops Quest a Question will arise from hence Whether the Apostles from the beginning ordained Bishops over the Presbyters Wee must needs answer Negatively Resp And the truth of this will appeare out of Act. 20.17 where the Apostle using these words to the Presbyters of Ephesus Take heed to your selves and to the whole flocke over whom the holy Ghost hath made you EPISCOPOS Bishops or Overseers Where as he giveth the name of Bishops to the Bresbyters so he addresseth his instructions to none befides From whence we may probably infer That at that time there were no Bishops If there had been any S. Paul would have mentioned them with respect to the eminencie of their office So we finde none at Philippi Phil. 1.6 as is evident by the Epigraph or Inscription of that Epistle to the Philippians None in the Church of Corinth as is collected by S. Ambrose and others from the many and great disorders which the Apostle sharply taxeth 1 Cor. 11.21 All which happened Vide Tert. de Praeserip c 36. where he calls the fore-named Churches Apostoloram Cathedras By which it appears that the Apostles sate there as chiefe because there was no Bishop to compose the differences of that Church in the Apostles absence It seemes then that the Apostle himselfe had taken the chiefe charge and oversight of those Churches wherein he had planted bodies of Presbyters This appears by that place in the 2 Cor. 11.28 Besides those things which are without that which commeth upon me daily the care of all the Churches See Acts 15 36. 1 Cor. 5.4 where he proceedeth in the sentence of Excommunication against the incestuous person and requireth of the church i.e. the Presbyter to see it satisfied And the whole frame of his Epistles containes the Acts of his Spirituall Government which he reserved to himself in chiefe over the Churches which he himselfe had planted The like may be asserted of Saint Peter in respect of those Churches committed to his charge Vid. 1 Pet. 5.1 where he directeth his exhortation of feeding the flocke to none but Presbyters which St. Hierome long since has maintained out of the 13. to the Hebrewes 17. where the Apostle writeth in the plurall number Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves c. SECT III THings being thus setled when the Apostles by reason of that multitude of busines had not leisure to attend in person upon the Churches which they had planted they appointed certaine Heads or Superintendents over the company of Presbyters which Heads ever since have retained the name of Bishop Thus were Timothy and Titus made Bishops over the Churches of Crete and Asia Whose Mother Church was Ephesus when it was revealed to the Apostle S. Paul that from thenceforth he was to make the Westerne parts of the world his Diocesse vid. Act. 19.21 And it was at Ephesus where S. Paul thus bespake the Elders Act. 20.25 And now behold I know that all you among whom I have gone preaching the Kingdome of God shall see my face no more And knowing by revelation that hee was to serve God no more in those Easterne
parts Vid. Tit. 1.5 hee appointed those two Disciples Timothy and Titus to be in his stead over those Churches And that their charge was as great as that of Bishops is not questioned by those who are versed in the most ancient Records of our Church Quid est Episcopus nisi primus Presbyterorum sayes St. Augustine Therefore if Timothy and Titus had a full power and authority to ordaine Presbyters and Deacons and to fit them with instructions to manage their severall offices we may not doubt out of a ●ond nicety to stile them Bishops or Overscers for that they were the Heads of their severall Presbyters and had a directive and coercive power over them in their particular charges which might be proved by many places in the holy Scriptures Wee may conclude then that S. Paul in that hee placed two of his prime Disciples in two principall Cities * Of Crete and Ephesus in which there were Presbyters and gave them in charge to ordaine Presbyters in every City as there should be need Hence I say we may inferre that our Apostle thus setling the Easterne Churches and appointing them their Heads and Bodies of Ecclesiasticall Governours Rev. 2.3 chap. This is also manifest by Ignatius his Epistle who was S. Johns Disciple who likewise makes often mention of Bishops and Presbyters intended to leave a patterne which afterwards should be followed in all Ages And that this Government was setled in Asia under Timothies charge it appeares by S. Iohns seven Epistles sent from our Lord to the 7. Churches directed to the Angels there who no doubt were Bishops And that act of his in directing his Epistles to one in the name and behalfe of the whole Church argues the eminencie of the Head fit to answer for the body it representeth SECT IV. ANd that the same forme of Government which was setled in Hierusalem and the forenamed Churches was likewise established in the Church of Antioch may be proved by that Text in the 13. of Acts where we read Act. 12.2 that there were in the Church of Antiochia certaine Prophets and Teachers and as they ministred unto the Lord and fasted the Holy Ghost said Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the worke whereunto I have called them and when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands upon them they sent them away It is safe to affirme that these Prophets and Teachers were no other then that ranke and order of Presbyters because we reade that they ministred unto the Lord and gave imposition of hands which was the worke of ordinary Ministers though that particular imposition of hands upon Paul and Barnabas was not an ordination of Paul and Barnabas but a separation of them v. 2. and destinating them to distinct Countries The Heads of the Church were S. Paul and Peter as appeares by Ignatius in his Epistle ad Magn. where wee have these words For at Antiochia the Disciples were first called Christians Paul and Peter founding the Church But to untwist a doubt which some may make that is How it came to passe that there were two Heads of that Church Gal. 2.9 10. Wee may answer that there were two severall congregations at one and the same time there the one of the Gentiles called by the Apostle Uncircumcision the other of the Jewes the care of the one was committed to Peter the other to S. Paul These two Apostles being called away by their imployments in other parts tooke the same course with this Church which before was done by S. Paul with those which he commended to the care of Timothy and Titus For both congregations being by that time united together in a sweet harmony of Love and Peace he commended them joyntly to the care of Euodius the Bishop who was predecessour to Ignatius To maintaine yet further the truth of the position we are assured by the authority of Dionysius Bishop of Corinth that Dionysius the Areopagite S. Pauls Convert was Bishop of Athens In Alexandria Act. 17.34 from Mark the Evangelist who was first set over that Church there was a continued succession of Bishops and Presbyters even untill the times of Heraclas and Dionysius as Saint Hierome witnesses in his Epistle to Euagrius SECT V. HAving proved that the Apostles ordained Presbyters to governe the Churches planted by their care and paines the Heads whereof after their departure were Bishops from this proofe we may easily draw this influence That the government of the Churches was for a long time upheld in common by Bishops and Presbyters as from the beginning the Presbyters governed joyntly with the Apostles This inference Mr. Th. confirmes at large by many demonstrative and undenyable arguments viz. p. 69 70 71. where out of Ignatius his Epistle ad Tra●●ianos and the Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1 Tim. 5.1 he proves what has been asserted Nothing was done in the Churchly the Bishop without his Presbyters advice and consent S. Ambrose his words are these Apud omnes utique gentes honorabilis est senectus unde Synagoga postea Ecclesia seniores habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesiâ This likewise is confirmed by S. Hierome upon Titus 1.5 and by the Authority of S. Cyprian Ep. 6. And by reason of this concurrence of the Presbyters with the Bishops in the Government of the Church it is that the most ancient Church Writers comprized both Bishops and Prebyters under the same titles entitling the Bishops Presbyters not because there were then no Bishops as some fondly deeme but because both concurred as hath been said in a joynt care of managing the affaires of the Church That their names were confounded Mr. Th. proves out of the Epistle of Clemens vide p. 54. and out of Ignatius his Epistle to Hero his Deacon Vi. Euseb Ecc. Hist p. 3. c. 23. where one and the same is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and also out of Tertul. de praescrip c. 3. The Apostle S. Peter stiles himself an Elder 1 Pet. 1.5 of which no other reason can be given but this that he so termes himself both in regard of his age in regard of his office which was common in the care of the Church with the Presbyters To evince farther that there was ever a cōmunity of names though a distinction in the order and office of Bishops and Presbyters he cites a place out of Tertull in his Apol. c. 39. Praesident probati quicque seniores c. where by the name of Elders or Presbyters is to be understood the order of Bishops With this of Tertullian accords that of S. Ambrose in his 1. Book de Offic. vid. c. 20. and of Irenaeus l. 4. c. 43. both which authorities you may reade at large in Mr. Th. book p. 77 78 79. And that both rankes or orders of Bishops and Presbyters were comprized under the name of Praepositi and Praesidentes
Mr. Th. is most observable and waighty He advises in the first place that with all circumspection and providence great care be used in ordering the choice of them His meaning is that if the people in the primitive Church had an interesse or share in giving consent to those who were to be ordained Presbyters much more must we think it very just and fit that the votes of the Presbyters and consent of the people should now precede and concur in the designing of such persons under whom and with whom they are to guide and be guided in spirituall affaires such persons are Bishops who should be men most holy in their life and most eminent for learning Most happy would this Nation be if all our Prelates were such and if that prescribed method were duly observed in the choice such would there alwayes or for the most part be who should fit at the Helme of this poore distracted Church now like to that Ship in which Peter was tossed and ready to sink for want of good Pilots SECT X. LAst of all because this Apostolicall government by Bishops and Presbyters is chiefly exercised in Ordination Penance a question may arise Whether it belongs to the Bishop alone without his Presbyters to censure the offences whether in doctrine or manners of those persons who have received holy orders Mr. Th. clearing first that place in 1 Tim. 5.19 20. answers the question Against an Elder receive not an accusation but under 2. or 3. witnesses c. That without all doubt it was the practice of the primitive times for the Bishop with his Presbyters to take the examination of offending Ministers whom being convicted of their offence by the mouth i. e. the asseveration of 2. or 3. witnesses he in the presence of his Presbyters did rebuke before all in the sight and hearing of the congregation that others thereby might be strucken with feare to offend God and his people by their scandalous conversation If this course had been taken formerly with Ministers and Deacons it might have so pleased God that the Church should not now have layen bleeding and gasping in this fatall ruine Neither would there have beene given to our enemies so just an occasion of relating sad truths in Gath and Askelon Thus following the method of that most learned Gentleman I have cast his larger Modell into a lesser frame that the cmmon people may hereby be better instructed and advised not to thinke of destroying Bishops but rather labour and wish for the restoring of their Presbyteries which forme of government being set downe and delivered in the holy Scriptures is commended and countenanced by the agreement of historicall Truth and primitive practice as of the Apostles and other succeeding ages And seeing that the Bishops succeeded the Apostles in place and function I cannot but wonder that those should endeavour to destroy them those who are Sons of the Apostles Faith and Doctrine S. Hierom of all Church Writers least favorable to the Order of Bishops is neverthelesse most large in acknowledging that without it the peace of particular Churches could not be preserved In witnesse whereof we may appeale to those many and happy dayes which our Church since the Reformation by means of it hath enjoyed without such ruptures and factions which have happened in a neighbouring Church whose people were alwayes observed to be of all others most daring in matters of Religion to innovate opinions and break the bonds of peace by which the good and welfare of Church and State is promoted To re-establish which blessed peace after which we groane in our prayers with panting desires it could be wished that wee might see the Heads of our Church the Bishops stand as Mr. Th. expresses it well in their right places being set over Bodies or Colledges of Presbyteries which should consist of men conforme to the Church both in Doctrine and Discipline To the want of which government although some have attributed those many inconvenciences wherewith the Church is cumbred yet most of the Clergy-men that are versed in the affaires of the Church wishing its prosperity and peace doe acknowledge and confesse with a protestation against it That there is one in conveniency now setled in the Church which has done much mischiefe and cannot be redressed without a publique Act of Parliament It is the committing of Jurisdiction at large even that which by the power of the Keyes received from Christ is proper and essentiall to the Church to Lay persons as Chancellors and Commissaries c. who may still retaine that office and ranke they hold in regard of those other points of Jurisdiction in charitable causes annexed by the favour of Princes and Lawes of Commonwealths to the Church As the probat of Wils c. which is fittest to judge and determine in such cases yet may be nonplust sometimes for want of knowledge in the Civill Law and therefore may and must have need of such assistants who if they moved onely in the lower Sphere of the Law and medled not with that Primum mobile the great wheele of the Church the discipline of penance but did leave the execution of this to the Bishop and Presbyters If this were once amended and officers duly censured by the B ps their Presbyters openly in the Church or in any publike place of Justice And besides the exercise of this discipline if they enjoined their joint pains parts in the tryall examination of persons who come for Ordination providing that none be ordained but those who are either Assistants of and are presented to Cures according to our Lawes if this were faithfully done and Ministers without connivence censured who should offend either in life or doctrine then should we see Righteousnesse run downe like a streame in our streets and Peace would flourish within our wals and Plenty in our palaces This is my daily prayer and it is the desire of all good Christians Da pacem Domine in diebus nostris Give peace in our time O Lord. O pray for the peace of Jerusalem FINIS Kinde Reader The Authors of this Book being by multiplicity of imployments detained from meeting together to revise the whole before the impression was finished the Errata swell to a greater number then may stand with the credit of the Book but if thou pleasest before the reading of it with thy pen to correct these ensuing we hope it will tend the more to thy satisfaction PAge 1. line 5. 1 Joh. 5.22 read Joh. 5.22 p. 5. l. 26. blot out is p. 6. l. 22. in some Copies comparing r. conforming p. 52. l. 19. three r. two and l. 20. blot out these words 3. It is an exercised power p. 73. l. 6. in margin potentissima r. potissima p. 75. l. 7. serve r. swear p. 82. l. 3. conventies r. conventions and l. 34. essentiall r. severall p. 84. l. 14. subject r. directly and properly subordinate p. 85. l. 33. essentiall r. severall p. 87. l 4. seeing r. preaching p. 95. l. 36 37. blot out those words God hath not given us the spirit of feare but of power Tit. 1.7 p. 96. l. 25. 1 Cor. 19. r. 1 Cor. 14. p. 103. l. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 111. l. 1. to 5. blot out the sentence from supposing to the period and l. 10. perfect r. profest p. 111. l. 7. because in no. r. but a. p. 115. l. 5. blot out joyntly p. 118. l. 3. blot out these words 3. He that sheweth mercy i. e. such as were to entertain strangers relieve the sick c. ver 8. p. 121. l. 10. blot out yet p. 123. l. 34. blot out well p. 169. l. 11. 1 Cor. 4.21 r. 1 Cor. 4.20 p. 172. l. 17. blot out of the Church p. 195. l. 5. a multitude r. multitudes p. 214. l. 28. blot out greater and l. 29. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Other literall faults will be pardoned of course