the very same time But I have given some Arguments to prove the contrary upon XL Exod. 17 18. And the meaning of these three Verses 10th 11th 12th of this Chapter may be not that they were Consecrated at the same time but with the same Oil. For first he says Moses took the anointing Oil and shows how it was employed after a different manner upon the Tabernacle and its Utensils upon the Altar and upon Aaron on whose Head it was poured whereas the former had it only put upon them with the finger or were sprinkled with it But though they were not Consecrated together yet their Consecration immediately followed one another For seven days being spent in sanctifying the Tabernacle and the Altar then immediately began the sanctification of Aaron and his Sons during which time Moses may be supposed to have received the foregoing Laws about Sacrifices in which they were to be employed as soon as they were Consecrated And the seven days for the Consecration of Aaron and his Sons immediately succeeding the other seven days which were spent in the Consecration of the Tabernacle and the Altar it may be the reason why they here are succinctly mentioned both together and neither of them mentioned before For if the account we have in the XLth of Exodus concerning these things be well attended to it will appear that nothing is there said of the anointing of the Tabernacle or any thing else but only that he set it up the first day of the Month as he was commanded v. 2 c. and 17 c. And he is commanded in like manner to take the anointing Oil and anoint the Tabernacle and all therein v. 9 c. and then to anoint Aaron and his Sons v. 13 15. but he relates nothing of his doing either of them till now when he executed those commands Ver. 13. Verse 13 And Moses brought Aarons sons and put coats upon them and girded them with girdles c. See XXVIII Exod. 40 41. XXIX 30. XL. 14. As the LORD commanded Moses He commanded him also to anoint them at the same time XXVIII Exod. 41. XL. 15. but it is not here mentioned because they were not anointed as he was by pouring Oil upon their Heads but sprinkling it on their Garments with the Blood of the Sacrifice offered for them And that he did afterward as he had been ordered v. 30. See XXVIII Exod. 41. XXIX 7. Ver. 14. Verse 14 And he brought the bullock See XXIX Exod 1 10 c. For a sin-offering So it was designed to be XXIX Exod. 14. And Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin-offering See XXIX Exod 10. I Levit. 4. Ver. 15. Verse 15 And he slew it XXIX Exod. 11. And Moses took the blood and put it upon the horns of the Altar round about with his finger As he had been directed XXIX Exod. 12. And purified the Altar It was purified before but this was a further purification of it that it might be the more fitted to be a place to make reconciliation upon it as it follows in the conclusion of the Verse And poured out the blood at the bottom of the Altar and sanctified it c. The vulgar Latin I think gives the true interpretation of these words rather than translates them in this manner It being expiated and sanctified he poured out the blood at the bottom of the Altar c. Fort. Scacchus hath taken a great deal of pains to prove that this Expiation as the Vulg. Lat. calls it went before the Anointing or Consecration of the Altar in his Myrothec P. II. cap. 34. But his Arguments seem to me of no force to overthrow the Opinion of Abulensis and Philo That these words do not speak of a proper Expiation of the Altar but that it was only hereby more particularly set apart as the word sanctifie signifies to be the place where Sin-offerings might be made that Men who had committed Offences might be expiated by these Sacrifices Ver. 16. Verse 16 And he took all the fat that was upon the inwards and the caul c. See XXIX Exod. 13. Ver. 17. Verse 17 But the bullock and his skin his flesh and his dung he burnt with fire without the camp as the LORD commanded Moses See XXIX Exod. 14. Yet we do not find that the Blood of this Sacrifice was carried into the holy place and therefore it did not fall under the Rule in the VIth Chapter of this Book v. 30. but might have been eaten by the Priests as is there allowed v. 26. Some think it sufficient for the solution of this to say that Aaron and his Sons were not yet compleatly Consecrated and therefore had not a right to eat of the Flesh of this Sin-offering But such Persons do not consider that Moses who now acted as a Priest could not be debarred of that benefit by this reason And therefore it is better to say that no High-Priest whether ordinary or extraordinary such as Moses now was might eat of any Sin-offering offered for the Priests themselves although the Blood of it was not brought into the Sanctuary From whence we may draw this Consequence that although the Sins of the People were taken away by the Priests who by eating of their Sin-offering plainly showed that they bare their sin as the phrase is X. 17. yet the Sins of the Priests themselves could not be taken away by any Sacrifice they could offer for sin of which they might not eat But they were to expect as an excellent Person of our own speaks Dr. Jackson Book IX upon the Creed cap. 26. a better Sacrifice made by a better High-Priest the Son of God But these Legal Sacrifices in the mean time were offered in such a place as prefigured the place where this better Sacrifice should be offered viz. without the Camp as when they came to their rest without the City of Jerusalem where our Saviour's Body was offered for our Redemption Ver. 18. Verse 18 And he brought the Ram for the burnt-offering and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the Ram. According to the direction given to Moses when he was with God in Mount Sinai XXIX Exod. 15 16. where all that follows here to the end of the 21st Verse is explained this being nothing else but the execution of what was before ordered Ver. 22. Verse 22 And he brought the other Ram. For he was commanded to bring two v. 2. and XXIX Exod. 1. The Ram of Consecration So it is called XXIX Exod 22 31. for the reason there given Ver. 23 24. Verse 23 24. And he slew it and Moses took of the blood of it c. These two Verses are explained XXIX Exod. 20. where order was given for what was now done I shall only add a Remark of R. Levi ben Gersom upon the order wherein these Sacrifices were offered which was most rational For first there was a Sacrifice
XL Exod. 34 35. openly showed it self to them all v. 23. and declared his Grace and Favour towards them by consuming their Sacrifice as an acceptable Oblation to him v. 24. Whereby a particular Honour also was done unto Aaron who was hereby most illustriously owned to be God's High-Priest and all other Persons deterred from pretending to his Office Ver. 7. Verse 7 And Moses said unto Aaron Go unto the Altar and offer thy sin-offering and thy burnt-offering One of them after the other in the order wherein they were directed viz. his Sin-offering first to make his Burnt-offering accepted Make an atonement for thy self and for the people First for himself as the Apostle observes VII Hebr. 27. that then he might be capable to offer for the Sins of the People This was the great imperfection of the Aaronical Priests that they were Sinners like other Men by reason whereof they were bound as for the people so also for themselves to offer for sins V Hebr. 3. And offer the offering of the people and make an atonement for them After he had offered both the Sin-offering v. 8. and the Burnt-offering v. 13. for himself then he was to begin to offer for the People For his own Sins being expiated and his Burnt-offering being accepted he was fit to procure Remission and Acceptance for them Ver. 8. Verse 8 Aaron therefore went unto the Altar That he might be ready to perform his part of the Service which was to sprinkle the Blood after he had first of all offered the Morning Sacrifice See v. 17. And slew the Calf of the sin-offering which was for himself Ordered it to be slain for this was no part of the Priests work as I showed upon the first Chapter v. 5. Ver. 9. Verse 9 And the sons of Aaron brought the blood unto him They received it in Basons as it run from the Calf when it was killed See I. 5. and brought it unto him who stood at the Altar to receive it and do what follows And he dipt his finger in the blood The fore-finger of the right hand which had been sanctified to this Ministry by putting the Blood of the Sacrifice of Consecration upon the thumb of the right hand VIII 23 24. whereby we grasp all things and cannot hold them strongly nor perform any thing well if that be wanting And put it upon the horns of the Altar c. See IV. 25. Ver. 10. Verse 10 But the fat and the kidneys and the caul above the liver See IV. 8 9. He burnt upon the Altar as the LORD commanded Moses Laid or disposed them upon the Altar to be burnt by the heavenly fire v. 24. as most understand it And the LXX justifie this Opinion who though they here translate it He offered it on the Altar yet v. 13. where there is the same phrase they expresly translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he laid the Burnt-offering upon the Altar and again v. 17. in the same manner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. he laid it upon the Altar besides the burnt-sacrifice of the morning For common fire it is supposed was no longer to be used when Aaron's Sacrifice began as it had been all along before But there is no certainty in this and we may as well take the words in their proper sense that Aaron burnt this and the following Sacrifice as Moses had done before VIII 14 21 28. until the Burnt-offering for the People came to be offered which God consumed by fire from himself and then followed those other Sacrifices mentioned v. 17 18. For all these Sacrifices for Aaron and for the People could not be laid upon the Altar at once but one after another in the order here directed and consequently this Sacrifice here mentioned was actually burnt upon the Altar to make way for those which followed it Ver. 11. Verse 11 And the flesh and the hide he burnt with fire without the camp See VIII 17. Ver. 12. Verse 12 And he slew the burnt-offering and Aaron's sons presented to him the blood c. See I. 5. Ver. 13 14. Verse 13 14. And they presented the burnt-offering unto him with the pieces thereof c. All that is contained in these two Verses is explained in the first Chapter v. 8 9. where the Law about burnt-offerings is delivered Ver. 15. Verse 15 And he brought the peoples sin-offering c. Having offered all that was necessary for himself now he became fit to make Supplication for the People And offered it for sin as the first In the same manner as he offered the foregoing Sin-offering for himself v. 8 c. Ver. 16. Verse 16 And he brought the burnt-offering Here being no express mention of burning it some from thence conclude that this was the Offering which alone was consumed by fire from the LORD See v. 24. And offered it according to the manner Laid it upon the Altar as Moses had directed in the first Chapter of this Book Ver. 17. And he brought the meat-offering c. Which attended upon Burnt-offerings XV Numb 2 3 4 c. Beside the burnt-offering of the morning This shows that Aaron began his Priestly Function with the Morning Sacrifice which preceded all other and was never omitted for the sake of any other Sacrifice that was to follow it and it had always a Meat-offering waiting upon it XXIX Exod. 39 40. Ver. 18 19. Verse 18 19. He slew also the Bullock and the Ram for a sacrifice of peace-offerings These two Verses are explained in the third Chapter which treats of such kind of Offerings Ver. 20. Verse 20 And he put the fat upon the beasts c. That it might by elevation and waving be presented unto the LORD and then burnt upon the Altar See VII 30. Ver. 21. Verse 21 And the breasts and the right shoulder Aaron waved for a wave-offering before the LORD The Fat being burnt upon the Altar as God's portion these were the portion of the Priests who feasted upon God's Meat for they were solemnly presented unto him before they had them See VII 34. Ver. 22. Verse 22 And Aaron lifted up his hands towards the people Imploring the Divine Blessing upon the People which he afterwards pronounced At this day they that are of the Family of Aaron going up the steps which lead to the place where the Book of the Law is kept lift up their hands as high as their heads and pronounce a Blessing in their Synagogues upon the Assembly And they say the ancient Custom was which is still observed not only to lift up and spread their hands but then to joyn them together by the thumbs and the two fore-fingers dividing the other from them in that Figure which is represented by an eminently learned Person J. Wagenseil in his Commentary upon Sota cap. 7. p. 672. and 1132. And blessed them We read of no order for this but natural Reason taught them from the beginning that the Priestly Office consisted in praying
Verse 5 And he shall take of the Congregation of the Children of Israel The former Sacrifices v. 3. were for himself these for all the People Two Kids of the Goats for a Sin-offering These two Goats made but one Sin-offering which is described more largely and particularly v. 8 9 10. The former perhaps which was sacrificed to the LORD was to procure those good things which they had forfeited by their sins and the other the Scape-goat as we translate it to avert those Evils which they had deserved For the name that is commonly given it by the Greeks signifies its power to turn away Punishments Or the simple reason of it might be that the Israelites by this double Sacrifice for both were presented before the LORD might be the more fully satisfied of the Expiation of their Sins There is the like example before of two Birds appointed for the cleansing of a Leper's House one of which only was killed the other let fly away but both of them are said to cleanse the House and to be for atonement XIV 49 52 53. In which some of the ancient Fathers thought they saw a notable Type of our LORD Christ Whose Sacrifice as it was prefigured by all the Legal Sacrifices for the Paschal Lamb it self was a Type of him sacrificed for us 1 Corinth V. 7. so by this more especially on the Day of Expiation Which was of greater and more universal efficacy than all the rest and therefore represented him more fully than the other did Insomuch that these two Goats joyned in one Sacrifice may be thought to represent one Christ consisting of two Natures For since it was not possible as Theodoret expresses it to adumbrate both the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which was mortal and that which was immortal in Christ he commanded two to be brought 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the Goat which was offered in Sacrifice might prefigure the passible Nature of his Flesh and that which was let go might show the impassible Nature of his Divinity Quaest XXII in Levit. And St. Cyril Discourses to the same purpose in his ninth Book against Julian And one Ram for a Burnt-offering Which was no more than was appointed for Aaron himself v. 3. who herein is equalled with all the Princes of the People in whose name this Ram seems to have been offered Ver. 6. Verse 6 And Aaron shall offer his Bullock of the Sin-offering which is for himself Not by killing it which was done afterwards v. 11. but only by presenting it before God to be sacrificed which was done with a solemn Prayer wherein he beseeched God to be propitious unto him and his The form of it is set down in Massechet Joma cap. 3. sect 8. He laid his hand upon the head of the Bullock and said I have done amiss and been rebellious and sinned before thee I and my House I beseech thee now O LORD remit my Rebellion and my Sin which I have committed and my House c. And make an atonement for himself and for his house For his Family as I said v. 3. and for all the Priests who are called the House of Aaron CXV Psal 10 12. CXXXV 9. And I do not see why all the House of Levi should not also be understood For they are not comprehended under the name of the Congregation of the Children of Israel mentioned in the Verse before and therefore must be contained here under the name of the House of Aaron See I Numb 49. Ver. 7. Verse 7 And he shall take the two Goats Mentioned v. 5. which were to be of equal stature of the same colour and the same price as the Hebrew Doctors say in Joma cap. 6. both designed to the same end the Expiation of their Sins And present them before the LORD at the door of the Tabernacle c. All the Sin-offerings which were made for the Congregation were presented either by the High-Priest or by the Elders IV. 15. and by them devoted to God to be sacrificed on his Altar For this presenting of the Goat is the same with his offering of the Bullock in the Verse foregoing in which was nothing else but his solemn Consecration of them as I said to be sacrificed According to which pattern our blessed LORD and Saviour a little before he suffered upon the Cross and made himself a Sacrifice for us voluntarily offered himself to die for our sins Which is the meaning of those words of his XVII John 19. where praying for his Apostles he saith For their sakes I sanctifie my self that is offer my self to die as an Expiatory Sacrifice for them For that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes signifies as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dr. Owtram hath demonstrated Lib. II. de Sacrificiis cap. 3. And so St. Chrysostom here expounds these words I sanctifie my self by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I offer thee a Sacrifice or consecrate and devote my self to be sanctified And it is not an improbable Conjecture of another very learned Friend of mine now also with God Dr. Spencer that the appointing of two Goats to be both presented to God at the same time and with the same Rites was to preserve the Jews in a belief that there is but one principle of all things who both bestows good things and inflicts evil Contrary to the opinion of the Gentiles who made two Principles one good and the other bad which was the ancient belief of the Chaldaeans and other Eastern People and from them propagated to the Greeks and Romans Most of whose Sacrifices as another very learned Man of our own Country hath observed had respect to these two Principles to one of which they offered in the Morning and to the other at Night See Dr. Windet de Vita Functorum statu sect 3. where he observes that there are plain footsteps of this old Error at this day through all the East as far as China for there was an endeavour to infect Christianity with it by Manes the Persian in the Reign of the Emperor Aurelian nor was there any Heresie that spread so far as this Dotage did Ver. 8. Verse 8 And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two Goats The manner of it is described in the same Treatise Massechet Joma cap. 3. sect 9. The High-Priest went to the East-part of the Court on the North-side of the Altar having the Sagan his Vicar on his right hand and the head of the House of the Fathers on his left There stood two Goats with an Vrn or Box which they call CALPI the very same name which Lucian and the Scholiast upon Aristophanes give to the same thing as our learned Sheringham upon that Book and Bochart in his Hierozoicon have observed Into this Urn the two Lots were cast which were made of Box-wood as the Misna here says and in after times came to be of Gold But Maimonides in his Treatise on this Subject saith they might be made either of Wood or Stone
others by making Expiation for them when they deserved to perish For so I am commanded These Orders as hath been already observed he received in the holy Mount So Aaron and his sons did all things which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses This was necessary to be added that all Generations might be assured whatsoever was performed by their Ministry would be effectual to the end for which it was appointed they being exactly Consecrated to God's Service without the least omission of any thing that he had required In like manner our great High-Priest was Consecrated to his Eternal Priesthood by fulfilling all the Will of God and that in a far more Solemn and Publick way than Aaron's was it being performed by Suffering such things as nothing but a perfect Filial Obedience to his heavenly Father could have moved him to admit because it was accomplished by shedding his own Blood in a lingring Death CHAP. IX Ver. 1. Verse 1 AND it came to pass on the eighth day He doth not mean on the eighth day of the Month but on the next day after their Consecration which was seven days in doing VIII 33 35. Then it was that the Fire fell down from Heaven and consumed the Sacrifice which Aaron offered and this seems also to have been the first day of unleavened Bread which fell upon the fifteenth day of this Month for on the fourteenth in the Even which was the last day of the Consecration of the Priests the Passover was kept IX Numb 2 5. That Moses called Aaron and his sons and the Elders of Israel Just as he had done before VIII 2 3. that the Rulers and as many of the People as could meet together to behold what was done might see the Glory of the LORD which appeared at this time v. 6. Ver. 2. Verse 2 And he said unto Aaron take thee a young Calf This is the first Sacrifice that was offered to God by the Priests of the Order of Aaron It differed from that which was offered by Moses for Aaron and his Sons as Egel a young Calf doth from Par a young Bullock by which his Sin was expiated at his Consecration And Maimonides saith that the former signifies a Calf of one year old the latter one of two Others say a Calf was called Egel till his Horns budded and then it was called Par. For a sin-offering For his sins in general not for any determinate Offence like that IV. 3. which therefore was something different from this The Jews fancy that a young Calf was appointed for the first Sin-offering to put Aaron and the People in mind of the Golden Calf which they worshipped So Maimonides reports the Opinion of their Wise men in his More Nevoch P. III. cap. 46. Where he also hath this conceit that it was to expiate that Sin And a Ram for a burnt-offering For none but Males were accepted for Burnt-offerings I. 10. There is no Peace-offering ordered for him as there is afterward for the People v. 4. because it was not fit he should have all the Sacrifice as he must have had according to the Law of such Sacrifices being both the Priest and the Offerer between whom and the Priest after the Fat was burnt all was to be shared Ver. 3. Verse 3 And unto the Children of Israel thou shalt speak saying Unto all the Elders v. 1. who were to bring the following Offerings in the Name of all the People of Israel and that by Aaron's direction who was now to act as God's High-Priest and gave out this Order Take ye a Kid of the Goats for a sin-offering The Hebrew word Seir signifies a He-goat Concerning which Maimonides in his Book concerning Sacrifices delivers this opinion That all Sacrifices for sin whether of private Persons or the whole Congregation at their three principal Feasts New Moons and the Day of Expiation were He-goats For this reason because the greatest Sin and Rebellion of those times was that they sacrificed to Daemons who were wont to appear in that form For which he quotes XVII 7. They shall no more offer their Sacrifices lasseirim which we translate unto Devils but the word Seirim is but the Plural Number of the word Seir which signifies a Goat And further he adds That their Wise men think the Sin of the whole Congregation was therefore expiated by this Kid of a Goat because all the Family of Israel sinned about a Goat when they fold Joseph into Egypt XXXVII Gen. 31. And such reasons saith he as these should not seem trifles for the end and scope of all these Actions was to imprint and ingrave on the Mind of Sinners the Offences they had committed that they might never forget them According to that of David LI Psal 5. My sin is ever before me This Sin-offering was different from that IV. 14. being not for any particular Sin as that was but in general for all the Offences that the High-Priest might have committed A Calf and a Lamb both of the first year c. When they were in their prime Ver. 4. Verse 4 Also a Bullock and a Ram. These also were no doubt to be without blemish as is prescribed in the two foregoing Offerings And the Hebrew word Sor which we translate a Bullock often signifies a well grown Ox as in XXI Exod. 28. XXV Deut. 8. As Ajil a Ram the Hebrews say signifies a Sheep of above a year old These made very large Peace-offerings and consequently a liberal Feast upon them For peace-offerings The very same order is here observed that was at Aaron's Consecration First Sin-offerings then a Burnt-offering and then a Peace-offering was offered to the LORD VIII 14 18 22. And a meat-offering mingled with oil Which was to compleat the Peace-offerings on which they were to feast that Meat might not be without Bread to it For to day the LORD will appear to you Give you an illustrious Token of his Presence by sending Fire from Heaven or from the Brightness of his GLORY to consume the Sacrifice v. 23 24. Whereby they were all assured that both the Institution of this Priesthood and the Sacrifices offered by it were acceptable to the Divine Majesty Ver. 5. Verse 5 And they brought that which Moses commanded Both Aaron v. 2. and all the Congregation v. 3. brought all the Offerings which Moses required Before the Tabernacle of the Congregation Where these Sacrifices were to be offered And all the Congregation drew near and stood before the LORD Approached to the door of the Tabernacle and stood there by their Sacrifices looking towards the Holy Place and worshipped the LORD Ver. 6. Verse 6 And Moses said Unto the Congregation This is the thing which the LORD commanded that ye should do I require this of you by the commandment of God who will demonstrate by a visible Token his Presence among you And the glory of the LORD shall appear unto you That Glory which filled the Tabernacle when it was erected
and then prayed for all that should believe on him i. e. the whole Congregation of Christian People from v. 20. to the end Immediately after which he went to the place where he was apprehended and led to be Condemned and Crucified XVIII John 1. See Dr. Owtram de Sacrificiis Lib. II. cap. 3. n. 3. Ver. 18. Verse 18 And he shall go out unto the Altar that is before the LORD These words before the LORD seem to restrain this to the Golden Altar where Incense was offered in the Sanctuary and so I find it is generally interpreted even by the Jews themselves in Joma cap. 5. sect 5. as well as Christians But the words he shall go out plainly signifie his coming from the Sanctuary where the golden Altar was and had been cleansed we may well suppose together with it v. 16. into the outward Court to the Altar of Burnt-offering which was also before the LORD XXIX Exod. 11. though at a greater distance from him and which one would think stood in need to be cleansed as much as the Altar of Incense Now unless it was ordered to be cleansed in these words I can see no care taken about it at all In XXX Exod. 10. there is express mention indeed made of making an atonement upon the Altar of Incense once a year and nothing said of the other and if we will so understand it here then the words he shall go out must have respect to his going into the holy place mentioned in the Verse before And make an atonement for it This is generally understood as I said of the golden Altar because such express mention is made of its Purification yearly in the place now mentioned XXX Exod. 10. And no doubt that which is here commanded was done there when he made Atonement for the Table where it stood But there being the same need as I said to expiate the other Altar where no fewer Errors had been committed than here and which stood nearer to an unclean People who incompassed it I cannot but think that it s here included And shall take of the blood of the Bullock and of the Goat He put the Blood of the Bullock and of the goat together and then poured them into another Vessel that they might be well mingled For here is no command in this place that he should go round the Altar twice and tip the Horns of it first with the Blood of the Bullock and then of the Goat separate one from the other as the Misna in Joma observes cap. 5. sect 4. And put it upon the horns of the altar round about He began at the North-east corner and so went to the North-west and from thence to the South-west and lastly to the South-east and as he came near to each corner he put the Blood upon it So the Jews describe this matter in the same place sect 5. Ver. 19. Verse 19 And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times Not upon the middle of the Altar but nigh the corners viz. in the place where he ended when he put the Blood upon the horns of the Altar So the Jews say in the place above-named sect 6. And I do not see why the Particle upon should not be expounded here as in v. 15. if their interpretation be true to signifie that he sprinkled the Blood before the Altar which he did not touch And shall cleanse it and hallow it from the uncleanness of the Children of Israel The Jews refer this cleansing to his taking the Coals and the Ashes from the Altar that he might sprinkle the Blood in a clean place And then the words are to be translated He shall sprinkle the blood c. having cleansed and hallowed it But the conclusion of the Verse determines us to another fense which is That by sprinkling the Blood he cleansed and sanctified it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel whereby it had been defiled the Priests having either come in their uncleanness thither or not performed their Service as they ought there and the People thereby remaining in their Impurities Now when the High-Priest had done all this the Jews say in the Misna before-named he poured the rest of the Blood of the Bullock and Goat at the bottom of the Altar of Burnt-offerings where I conceive he concluded this Atonement for there was a conveyance to carry it away as I observed upon IV. 7. And they make account also that if every thing was not done in this order it was ineffectual and was to be done over again For example If the Blood of the Goat was sprinkled before the Blood of the Bullock contrary to the directions v. 14 15. he returned and sprinkled the Blood of the Goat after that of the Bullock c. Ver. 20. Verse 20 And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place Making it fit to continue God's dwelling place v. 16. And the Tabernacle of the Congregation By this I think is meant the Sanctuary and every thing in it particularly the golden Altar And the Altar Of Burnt-offerings where he ended his Atonement for the whole House of God He shall bring the live Goat Two had been presented to the LORD v. 7 10. that is solemnly consecrated and devoted to be expiatory Sacrifices one of which having been slain the other was now brought to be made an Expiation for Sin after another manner And he was brought no doubt to the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation where they were wont to lay their hands upon other Sacrifices I. 3 4. Ver. 21. Verse 21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live Goat Laying of the hand upon the head of the Beast was a Rite used in all sorts of Sacrifices whether Burnt-offerings Peace-offerings or Sin-offerings See I. 4. III. 2. IV. 4 33. In which places mention is made only of laying on his hand But here the High-Priest is commanded to lay on both hands as he and his Sons did in the Sacrifice of the Bullock and the Ram at their Consecration VIII 14 18. The meaning of which was the more solemnly and intirely to devote the Sacrifice to the uses for which it was designed which in this Sacrifice was to bear all their Sins For they were all laid upon this Sacrifice unto which the punishment of them was transferred This Rite signifying as much as if they had said Whatsoever we have done amiss let not us but this Sacrifice be charged with it that is let it bear the punishment which we deserve Such phrases there are 2 Sam. I. 16. IX Esther 25. VII Psal 16. and other places And confess over him This must have been understood if it had not been expressed for imposition of hands was always accompanied with Prayer of one sort or other according to the occasion of it Insomuch that the Jews say Where there is no Confession of Sins there is no Imposition of Hands for
Cloth was tied to the Gate of the Temple and if it turned white when the Goat was sent away as they pretend it usually did there was great joy among the People because it was a sign their sins were forgiven according to that of the Prophet I Isa 18. Though your sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow c. But if it did not change its colour into white they hung down their heads and were full of sorrow they looking upon it as a Token of God's anger Which I relate only for this purpose that I may take notice how the same Authors who tell this story confess that for forty years before the destruction of the second Temple that is from the time of our Saviour's death this shred of Cloth never changed its colour at all Which if it be true was a notable Token of the Wrath of God coming upon them for their crucifying the LORD Christ Ver. 23. Verse 23 And Aaron shall come into the Tabernacle of the Congregation All that the High-Priest did about the Scape-goat was performed at the Door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation where he laid his hands upon him and confessed over him all their sins See v. 20 21. which being done and he having sent the Goat away he is now ordered to come into the Sanctuary it self And shall put off the linen garments which he put on when he went into the holy place See v. 4. The Jews say there were two sorts of white Garments which he wore on this day One in the Morning which were made of fine Linen of Pelusium which was a third part of greater value than those he wore in the Evening which were of Indian Linen Now here he speaks only of the Garments that he wore in the Morning wherein he had hitherto officiated but is ordered after he had done all this to put them off there being many other things to be still performed upon this day yea he was to go once more into the holy place in order to which he put on other Garments as will appear in what follows And shall leave them there Never to be used more either by him or by any body else But they were laid up when they were left and new ones made against the next year as the Gemara upon the third Chapter of Joma relates And the same is affirmed by Maimonides R. S. Jarchi and others mentioned by Braunius L. II. de Vest Sacerd. cap. 25. n. 9. R. Levi Barcelonita also gives the same Exposition of it Praecept 99. and see Mr. Selden Lib. III. de Synedr cap. 11. p. 143. Ver. 24. Verse 24 And he shall wash his flesh with water in the holy place Either in the Laver which stood in the outward Court or in a Room in the Tabernacle which in after time was called Happervah where the Priest they say washed himself upon this day every time he changed his Garments And this agrees well enough with the words of Moses which here follow that when he had put on his Garments he should come forth that is from this Chamber to perform such Offices as are after mentioned The end of this washing in this place seems to have been that he might purifie himself after he had touched the Goat which bare all their iniquities v. 21. as the Man that carried him into the Wilderness was to wash after he had done that business v. 26. Though others will have it that it was in token he had now finished the Expiation Certain it is here is another washing distinct from that mentioned v. 4. when he put on the white Garments Which in part justifies what the Misna saith in Joma cap. 3. sect 3. that the High-Priest washed five times upon this day all in the House Happervah except the first which could not be in the Court of the Tabernacle because he was to wash before he entred into it For there were five Ministeries to be performed upon this day at each of which he changed his Garments and between every Ministry when he changed his Garments he washed himself There is a long Discourse about this and about washing his hands and his feet in Torah Cohanim quoted by our learned Country-man Mr. Sheringham in his Annotations upon Codex Joma p. 57. c. which they endeavour to ground upon the very words of this Verse Now as the leading of Christ into the Wilderness upon the Day of Atonement was fore-shadowed by the Ceremony of the Scape-goat so his Baptism on the same day was as expresly fore-shadowed or prefigured as any event concerning him either was or could be by the Legal Ceremony here mentioned of Aaron's washing his Body in the holy place They are the words of Dr. Jackson in Christ's Answer to John's Question sect 64. where he endeavours to make out this And put on his garments Viz. His other Garments wherein he officiated upon other days which the Jews call his golden Garments to distinguish them from the white Garments which alone he wore when he went into the most holy place And the Jews call by this name of golden Garments all the eight Garments of the High-Priest four of which were common to him with the lower Priests and were made only of Linen yet they never call them by the name of white Garments which they appropriate to those in which he went into the most holy place the other four which gave the name to all the rest were proper only to the High-Priest himself viz. the Robe which had Bells of Gold at the bottom the Ephod the Breast-plate and the Golden-plate upon his forehead which being put over the other four common Garments made him appear as if he were all clothed in Gold For they either consisted of solid Gold as the Plate on his forehead or had solid Gold appendant as the Robe had or had Gold interwoven as the Ephod and the Breast-plate Now he put on these after he had put off the Linen Garments mentioned v. 4 23. which were never used but when he ministred in the Holy of Holies where he did not appear with the Breast-plate of Vrim and Thummim and the rest of the golden Garments as some learned Men have imagined particularly Corn. Bertram in his Book de Republ. Hebr. cap. 7. where he saith Hujus Sacerdotis erat semel in anno adytum sanctuarij adire indutus ipso Ephode It belonged to the High-Priest to go once in the year into the most secret place of the Sanctuary clothed with the Ephod Which is directly contrary to v. 4. of this Chapter But many other great Men have fallen into the same mistake See J. Braunius de Vestitu Sacerdot Hebr. Lib. II. cap. 20. n. 29. cap. 25. n. 9 10. And come forth From the place where he put on his golden Garments unto the Altar of Burnt-offerings And offer his burnt-offering and the burnt-offering of the people I take this for the daily Evening Sacrifice which usually was