therefore they despise all Antient Doctors of the Primitive Church and I think in Tertullian's Words against Montanus we may say it to be the Socinians opinion Truth waited for their Coming without which it had been quite lost yet according to their Principles we must all be Scepticks and Pyrhonians always doubting of every thing and never sure of any then in the Word of God is no Truth that we can be certain of we know no Man hath dominion over the Faith of another nor ought to impose his Opinion upon others neither could they who went before us be Masters of our Faith nor we of the Faith of those who are to come after You see I make use of your own Expressions but withal I must tell you that if any one would in former or present times offer to force things of their own upon us to believe we would reject it by their own we mean any thing different from or contrary to the Word of God 't is not their offering to us or of us to others can bind the Consciences but the things offered do if they be the Word of God no human Authority doth per se and of it self tye my Conscience but God's Word doth therefore if any thing be proposed as an Article of Faith we must see whether it be contained in the Word of God which bears Record of it self and so stands in no need of the Testimony of Man 't is not the hand that gives Alms which can make Gold to be Gold or Silver to be Silver nor the Lawyers quoting the Law that can make it to be Law 't is so in it self so is Gospel Gospel in it self without any human help or else you make the Gloss and Interpretation more than the Text and as according to your Principles you may alter your Interpretation one to day and another different from it the next what a Confusion would you leave us in when you are so sickle and cannot agree with your own selves as indeed you make an Alteration in the Questions from what they were in Socinus's days By what they say of Doctrines which according to circumstance of times may be convenient or inconvenient I find them inclined to blame the times to excuse themselves but the Faults which too often are committed the Times are not to be accused of but the Malice or Weakness of Men there being no Season so troublesome as can keep a good Judge from doing Justice or a good Divine from giving a good Interpretation of Scripture so Mens Faults ought to be chastised and not the Times which are as Men govern themselves to be complained of but good and holy Laws ought to be enacted by those whom it belongs to having the Glory of God and the Good of the People before their Eyes new Distempers require new Remedies and new Laws are necessary against new Crimes wherefore I lay hold on this new occasion and once more make bold to both Houses of Parliament humbly to commend the Cause of God and of his Son the Lord Jesus according as I formerly besought them in my Epistle in earnest to mind it or else with David I say Arise O God plead thine own Cause However as to Faith and Practice they give a good Character of themselves as to the first they believe all the Articles of the Apostles Creed but still they reserve unto themselves to give what Interpretation they please but sure we are 't is not that contained in the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds Still there is a Jesuitical Jugling Equivocation and Mental Reservation Ask them which is the true sense of the Words in Jesus Christ his only Son they will not say 't is of his own Nature and Substance and from Eternity which Creed say they was heretofore thought a full and sufficient Summary of Faith till some Men perverted the true and Orthodox Meaning and brought false Glosses upon 't contrary to the plain and natural Interpretation received by the Universal Church then indeed to refute unsound and Anti-scriptural Expositions and wresting of the true Sense to explain and enlarge was found necessary 'T is their Principle thankfully to lay hold on the Message of Redemption by Jesus Christ This seems fair but is very defective for according to them Christ came into the World as a bare Messenger a meer Man to declare the Will of God unto us which others tho not so fully and plainly had done before to die only for our good but not in our stead nor to purchase us by the Merits of his Death So they say the Lord Jesus is God by Favour not by Nature robbing him thus of his Divinity When we seriously come to the matter they are full of Quiblings and Cavils As to the receiving the Message of Redemption 't is according to them by strength of Reason and not of Faith for no true Faith in Christ except Men believe him to be true God as well as true Man As to Practice this Character they give of themselves They fear God walk humbly before him hold no Correspondence with any known Sin c. This is well but not enough for the moral Virtues of the Heathen carryed some of them as far as this But a sound Knowledg in the Mind is required and no sound saving Knowledg of Christ except one knows him for such as he is that is God and Man or else he is but half a Christ an imperfect Mediatour whole Christ is the true Object of Faith These things are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God as well as the Son of Man I am glad to find something like the Matters in question in the first Letter we are told what ground they go upon concerning their Opinions Scripture they own to be the Rule of Faith but unto themselves they reserve the Interpretation which is as bad as what they condemn in Papists to depend upon the Authority of their own Interpretation and so can turn it which way they please so may every Socinian as well as every Quaker have their private Interpretation but to say that Protestants for the interpretation of Scripture do rely upon their own Reason is without warrant and doth not consist with Truth except by Protestants they mean Socinians if this were a fit place I could shew that they have not the same regard as we for Scriptures tho they assert it for they dispute the Truth and Authority thereof but I must come to human Reason which in one page is twice asserted to be the onely Guide God hath given us in matters of Religion for under that head I reduce the three he there mentioneth about Revelation but this is not the Judgment of true Protestants if a Man hath no other Guide but his own Reason 't is a blind one and very defective 't is but one part of three and the least too for to the end that human Reason may be a fit
already setled by Law you thereby introduce Confusion into the Church which may soon become Anarchy in the Government which to prevent in my humble Address to the Parliament I thought the Laws now in being about such things might be executed and if in their Wisdom they thought fit new ones be enacted What Papists believe or do as to Authority about Interpretation of Scriptures is no Rule nor Precedent for us there is a sad Experience in the World of the nature of the Spirit which they are acted by and of the Methods they have taken to support their spiritual Tyranny over the Consciences and Souls yea Lives of Men they made themselves Parties and Judges and would admit or hear of no Reasons contrary to theirs which were grounded not upon God's Word tho' in some things they pretend it but their own Traditions and Practice to their Church Now among us you find no such thing the Law is open for you if you take Scripture to be it whereof you sadly wrest the Words contrary to their natural Sense without giving any good Reason for it and you stand by your selves in defiance and opposition of the general Consent of the Universal Church which condemned those unsound Men when they appeared against the Person of our Saviour and Lord. And here I must say we no more than you receive the Authority of Antiquity or of Fathers upon their own bottom for we agree they were fallible when they said so and so but whether in so saying they spake truth is well worth enquiry into I will compare them with Scripture and if they agree with it I will agree with them And this is to me a strengthning Evidence that I am not singular seeing others as well as I could in the Word of God find those Truths which I do believe Wo be to him that is alone abounds in his own Sense and thinks he knows more than all the World besides for the application of Scripture Truths it may be every ones Right to direct himself by his own Reason enlightned by the Spirit as to the Explication a very great care ought to be had and still according to the Rule of God's Word with all the help he can get besides but when they have Opinions which they find are generally opposed People so modest so quiet and of the Character they give of themselves not to disturb others should keep it within themselves and not be so servent as ye are to spread it abroad whether your Zeal be without or against Knowledg And if every one who pretends to be a Member of the Church be so busie as ye are to promote their Opinions and no Curb be put upon Interpretations then no end of Heresie Blasphemy or of all sorts of the worst Opinions But before I proceed I think fit to pull down that Strong-hold of theirs as they take it to be tho' rather Sandy Foundation of a free liberty for every one to make what interpretations they please and that I shall the more willingly do tho' as briefly as I can because 't is a Matter controverted between them and us which I had no occasion to meddle with in my Book To begin I say as there is a Right so there is a false Interpretation of Scripture The Right is that which gives the true sense and meaning the False on the contrary Now if every private Man might Interpret Scripture what monstrous Interpretations would there be as we see it too much in the World and this is the ground of Heresy Blasphemy and Fanaticism which to prevent the Lord Jesus as St. Paul saith in those two places where he mentions the Offices in the Church hath settled Prophets and Teachers Every private Man may Read but not Interpret Scripture which in this Case is the first thing to be known For saith the Apostle knowing this first that no Prophecy of the Scripture is of any private Interpretation so the Interpretation must come from whence the Revelation came 't is but one and the same Spring therefore in the next Verse he clears the Matter For Prophecy came not in old time by the Will of Man but holy Men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost which doth exclude as humane private Revelation so also humane private Interpretation And herein Paul joineth with Peter when he puts this Question Do all Interpret Which contains an Exclusive how all do not no more than all are no workers of Miracles Furthermore we must know how Scripture hath a binding Power not only directive but also decisive over the Conscience so that thereby the Conscience far from having that free liberty is tied and bound to the determination of the Word or else no Man that believes an Opinion contrary to sound Doctrine and never so heretical and blasphemous could be guilty of Sin But we are assured of the contrary for they who wrest the Scriptures do so unto their own destruction tho' a man must be very cautious not to go against his Conscience yet where there is a Competition between God and Man the Word of God and the Judgment of Man when each challenge of us a Consent we must give it the Word which certainly is true and infallible preferably before the Conscience which may be seduced and erroneous which happens often when 't is guided by humane Reason In Scripture is in matters of Faith a convincing and constraining Power which in Conscience we are bound to submit to in Humane things the Judge is not properly Judge except he Judges according to the Law for he hath no power to alter or corrupt but to declare the true sense of it The Interpretation of the Divine Law which the Question is now about may happen to be mistaken but the Law never for 't is Infallible as being the Word of the True and Infallible God hence is derived its Divine and Undisputable Authority beyond that of any thing else and it should work upon men more than Miracles even than raising from the Dead which may be called the greatest of all for they that hear not Moses and the Prophets will not be perswaded tho' one rose from the Dead The reason is because therein the Spirit of God speaks and thereby leads us into all Truth And indeed if Scripture was not the end of Debates in matters of Religion our Conscience could never be settled nor quiet for that same thing no Humane Reason Power or Judgment is able to effect but we aquiesce to rest and depend upon the Word of the God of Truth and if at the Bar of Conscience there was no such binding Rule but men were left to their own private Judgment none would be bound to believe Scripture but always live amidst Doubts Difficulties and Conjectures not to say singular Notions Fancies and Dreams and so we could never be at a certainty Besides that after this there were no Sin in any man to receive any
Guide it must be first subordinate to Revelation which is the prescribed Rule and from which it ought not to recede no more than a Judge from the Law as Paul told Ananias or else he is in danger of falling into Precipices that 's the Light it must follow and as the Soul is guided by Reason so must Reason be by Revelation neither can Reason and outward Revelation do the Work without inward Revelation whereby Reason is supernaturally endowed and this is Faith a Gift of God this is the ground of our Blessed Saviour's giving his Father thanks for revealing the Mysteries of Faith and Salvation unto Babes that is those who as yet in his Sense were not capable of Reason and plainly tells Peter that if he knew and confessed him to be the Son of the living God Flesh and Blood or his natural Reason had not revealed it unto him but his Father which is in Heaven When the Lord Jesus was upon leaving this World he promised his Disciples a Guide what their own Reason no such thing but the Holy Ghost the Spirit of Truth who should teach them all things and bring to remembrance whatsoever he had said unto them and he was to abide with them for ever this Spirit of God is the right Guide whom true Protestants own to lead and guide us in the way of Salvation and this he doth not according to human Fancies or private Inspirations but according to the Rule of the Word for saith our Saviour he shall receive of mine that is my Word and shall shew it unto you for he shall not speak of himself he teaches and applies the Word and his working is by the Apostle called the Spirit of a sound Mind which God hath given us so that a sound Mind an Orthodoxy in the Faith is an Effect of God's Gift not of our Reason or of any thing else in us wherefore David saith give me Vnderstanding according to thy Word But these things Socinians have been told over and over and in the Preface and latter end of my Book I think I said enough to satisfie unbyassed Persons so have others too this is the sure and infallible Guide which God hath given us and not any human Authority different from or contrary to it the Pope we cannot own for he is a Party and sets up for himself nor the antient Writers if they deviate from the Rule but 't is a good Argument for the things wherein they follow it Men must not be so selfish and wilful as to despise others who may have the Spirit of God as well as themselves and being Witnesses of those Times are able to inform us how things stood in their time and cannot be partial for this wherein we live The Author of the first Letter hath a touch upon the matter and that 's all 't is about the interpretation of what S. John saith the Word was made Flesh I confess there is a great difference in the interpretation we say according to the natural Signification the Word or Son of God took upon him our human Nature they say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate the Word signifies Reason rather than Word and they infer that the Reason or Wisdom of God was communicated unto Jesus Christ this is a very much forced Interpretation and fetch'd afar off for all along the Word is spoken of as a Subject and they would make a shift to turn it into the Predicate Now what shall we do of these two Opinions to find out the true one for if every Person or Party be allowed such a Latitude as to interpret things after their own Fancy there will be no end of false Glosses and wrong Interpretations how doth the Goldsmith do to know true Gold or Silver from that which is false he brings it to the Touch-stone so must we in this case between them and us is a Difference the Party must not be the Judge 't is not just they should be Judges in their own cause nor we in ours then we must agree about a Judge such as is impartial and infallible and none but God is such now God doth not immediatly speak from Heaven for he doth it in his Word that is his Will and ought to be our Law and Rule in matters of Faith I will believe no Man's Assertion except out of Scripture he proves it to me the like he may justly expect from me but in case of that Text of Scripture he and I give different Interpretations what 's to be done we ought still to keep in the same Court and wait for a Decision from the same Judge then I must prove my Interpretation by some other place of Scripture or else he must not believe me nor I him except he doth the like and if Men will but lay aside Prejudices and be acted by a real and sincere desire to find out the Truth God will not leave them but therein afford such Helps as shall answer their Good for all Scripture is given by Inspiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction for Instruction in Righteousness that the Man of God may be perfect Now let us come to our Point and reduce the Rule to a Practice the Question is Whether by the Word is meant a Person as we say or a Quality as they would have it there is a great Difference between Persons and Things now to find out the Truth this Text must be compared with others we need not to go far for in the first Verse of the Chapter we read thrice the same Name in the beginning was the Word was signifieth existed had a Being which relateth to a Person and not to a Thing the same Word was with God and was God what a Quality with God and a Thing God doth the Evangelist begin his Gospel in so high a strain only to tell us how Reason was in the beginning how Reason was with God and Reason was God or in plain Words that God was Reasonable which is a Truth known to every one so no need to tell it but he would acquaint the Readers with things before unknown to them besides doth this hold any proportion with the Nature and Excellency of the Gospel and great Tidings of Salvation this indeed is to exalt Reason and because they make a God of their Reason therefore for Name 's sake Reason must be deified then according to their Principle this Reason must be an efficient Cause of all for all things were made by him and without him was not any thing made that was made to create and make things is the Property and Act of a Person and not of a Thing in him as in a Person and not as in a Thing was Life and the same Apostle calls him the Word of Life that Life which was manifested and that Eternal Life which was with the Father first and then was manifested unto us as if
he had said the living God according to an usual way of speaking in Scripture when the Abstract is put for the Concrete thus God is called the Lord our Righteousness that same Word that was God was made Flesh and dwelt among us to dwell denotes a Person and we Beheld his Glory not the Glory of Reason or Wisdom but the Glory as of the only begotten of the Father here is a Relation of a Son to a Father and surely a Son is a Person not a Thing and of this same John bare witness of him saying this was he of whom I spake he that cometh after me is preferred before me read on till ver 19. all along the Word is spoken as of a Person and in ver 17. he declares who that Word is by a Comparison between Persons the Law was given by Moses but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ This Jesus Christ he hath been speaking of all this while and his Design is to shew that Jesus Christ is the Word so often by him mentioned and to that effect he speaks of John's Evidence about him if the Word be a Thing and not a Person Christ was so and so Moses who was a Person and Christ after he was made Flesh is compared to him O the Perverseness of some Mens Judgment who read Scripture not to find out Truth or be guided by it but out of it to wrest some things to support their Prejudices Papists to set up the Pope's Supremacy think after much seeking to have found a Text to serve their turn he that is spiritual judgeth all things yet he himself is judged of no Man with them the Pope is that Spiritual Man the Socinians whose Design is not to set up one as Papists do but to pull down and destroy the great Work of Incarnation say because it serves their turn no Word or Divine Person but only the Reason of God was made Flesh Out of what I have said I think it plainly appears how the Scope of the Place and the Design of the Evangelist is to speak of a Person and not of a Thing But to prove our Interpretation let us further search into Scriptures Paul speaks to our purpose for as John saith the Word that was God was made Flesh so he declares that God was manifest in the Flesh which he calls the great Mystery of Godliness and the whole Verse tho in different Branches as preached unto the Gentiles believed on in the World received up into Glory do plainly demonstrate the Lord Jesus to be that God or Person of the Godhead manifest in the Flesh and in another Place he saith when the Fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a Woman that Person which in another place is called God in this is called the Son of God and in another God's own Son or proper Son in these several Texts mention is made of an Incarnation or of being made Flesh manifest in the Flesh made of a Woman and God sent his own Son in the Likeness of sinful Flesh and the Subject is called the Word God Son of God God's own and proper Son is there in all this any Metaphor or any Ground to say that the Word made Flesh signifieth Reason communicated to Jesus all this proves that our Interpretation is according to the Analogy of Faith and shews a sweet Harmony of several Texts of Scripture to demonstrate the adorable Mystery of the Incarnation of the Son God Thus far we proved our Interpretation of that Text of Scripture we do not perceive they are in a Condition to do the like for theirs for if they could we should hear of it they have not one Text to do it Magister dixit is no Reason with us the Vnitarian may say but that is not enough what he saith he must prove upon true Grounds and to the purpose well for want of Scripture the Author of the Letter gives a Reason of his own which is this And we all know that Divine Wisdom may be communicated to Man without the Incarnation of God Did ever any one read such a pitiful coming off in so weighty a matter as this is how sawcy with God are some Men in the World in setting out their foolish and wandering Fancies and where is a due Respect for his Holy Word hath not God made foolish the Wisdom of these Men if ever they had any doth this Interpretation hold any proportion with that high and noble Idea which the Evangelist would give us of the Person whose History he writes first of all we defy them to shew that this is the Sense of any Text concerning this Matter Secondly suppose they could yet it being against the usual Meaning they ought to shew reason why in this place it should be taken otherwise and then must such a silly Reason weigh down the Authority of so many Texts of Scripture what will become of all the glorious Attributes and Prerogative of the Lord Jesus over Angels and Men what of that Name which is above every Name God's own only begotten Son in whom he is well pleased if all comes only to this God's Reason and Wisdom were communicated to him which God in a high degree did to Solomon and to others of his eminent Servants whereby he must make them equal with his Son and he with them we all know that God if he pleases can create another World must we conclude therefore he hath not created this God if he had pleased could have delivered his People out of Egypt otherwise than by the hand of Moses must we say therefore he delivered them not by his hand Out of what God can do we must not infer that he hath not done what he hath done because God can communicate Reason to Man therefore the Word the Son of God was not made Flesh Ye great Logicians is this a good Consequence risum teneatis I could almost say if the thing in question was not of the highest importance Before I leave this Point I shall skip over to another place of the Letter for tho' he there speaks not to me but to another whose Notions I am not concerned for yet what he saith relating to the Cause I ought to take notice of the more because it belongs to that Text of John which hitherto we were upon 't is said Tke Incarnation of God is no where expressed in Scripture it can be no more than meerly a deduction from thence 'T is well you are so kind as to grant 't is in 't in some way As to the first part if you say in so many Letters according to your cavilling way we know 't for the word Incarnation is Latin and so none of the Books of Scripture being originally written in that Language we must not think to find it in 't but we say a word altogether equivalent and which signifies the same thing is in 't Doth not to be made Flesh
we do whence we conclude he is because he said so which if he were not he had asserted a Lye spoken Blasphemy and the Jews had been in the Right but seeing he said he was the Son of God he spoke the Truth which Socinians denying they bring the Lye and Blasphemy upon themselves and as good as say as the Jews did to Pilate He ought to die because he made himself the Son of God John 19 7. The other Text to prove how the Name Son of God when spoken of Christ signifies God is this Lazarus's Sickness was for the glory of God that the Son of God might be glorified thereby We may see how the word God is explained by that of Son of God So that whether the name God be taken Essentially or Personally still the Person of the Son is God for therein is but One Glory of God and of the Son of God the Father is glorified in the Son if they have one equal and common Glory then they have a common and equal Nature for we know the true and eternal Almighty God hath said My Glory will I not give to another In my Book I at large have asserted this Divine Filiation of the Lord Jesus with the manner of it and thereunto expected an Answer if they had been willing and able to give it That Divine and Proper Sonship and his Godhead John in several places of his Gospel and Epistles both as his own belief and in the very words of our blessed Lord in those Comparisons which he so often makes between himself and the Father lays it so clear that for an unprejudiced mind there is no ground left to doubt of it the Pronoun possessive My in the Singular number joined with Father which so frequently he makes use of doth denote the Singular Nature of his Sonship and distinguish it from every other Kind I shall mention only what when he was but Twelve Years old upon the occasion of his being found in the Temple asking the Doctors of the Law Questions and Mary having said Son why hast thou thus dealt with us He answered Wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business The meaning of which they understood not as the Evangelist observes he thereby signified another kind of Filiation that what had any relation to Mary As according to the Flesh he was her true and proper Son because begotten of her own Substance so in relation to the Spirit and Deity he is God's own and proper Son because begotten of the Substance of the Father If there be any such as certainly there is and in the Chapter about his Eternal Generation I sufficiently proved it then ye Socinians cannot deny the Lord Jesus to be He and if he be not the proper Son of the Father as the Apostle affirms he is then God the Father is not properly a Father for the works of Grace do not properly make one a Father but it must be the work of Nature of Humane in Men of Divine in God Humane Nature may receive some Divine Gifts but only thus much as it is capable of within certain bounds and degrees or else it were to make Humanity to be Deity But Christ hath not the Spirit by Measure or by Grace but by Nature and Infinitely in him which no Finite being such is every Creature is capable of the reason is because in Christ dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily Thus he must necessarily be God primarily and not derivatively or in part only for Divine Nature is indivisible either wholly God with all Attributes of the Godhead or no God at all No Creature Man Angel or Arch-Angel can have all the fulness of the Godhead dwelling in him because none of them is the Infinite God But since all the fulness of the Godhead dwelleth in the Person of Christ he must needs be God Infinite for all this fulness of the Godhead is a fulness of Nature of the Essential Attributes of that same Nature of Immensity Power Eternity and of any thing else proper to that Nature If in the whole Word of God there was no other Text but this to prove the Godhead of our Saviour it were sufficient to do 't it being so positive so full and so plain All is an Absolute word to be taken without any restriction or limitation whatsoever All Fulness What more can be said Of the Godhead What more Divine and Expressive But what upon the matter remains in the same place is this Whether a God and a God and a God do not amount to more than One God To take the thing as I ought and not as some others do I say that your Arithmetick in this doth fail and deceive you wherefore believe Revelation before your Reason which indeed may tell you how in humane and finite things One One and One make Three but Revelation which contradicteth not it self calls the Father God the Son God and the Holy Ghost God the same also saith there is but One God A Divine Nature common to Three Persons doth imply Three Persons but no more than One God which is One Divine Nature subsisting in Three Persons and Three Persons existing in One Nature Must I with Scripture conclude that Father Son and Holy Ghost are but One God or with your Arithmetick and Reason that they are Three Gods make but your Reason first agree with Revelation and then you and I shall agree so that the Dispute is more between your Reason and Scripture than between you and me But surely with me Gods Word is of greater Authority than your Reason ye must not suffer your Reason that Ignis fatuus to wander from the Rule Do you know what Solomon saith He that trusteth in his own heart is a Fool if you know it not I tell you and your Partner he speaks to you when he saith Cease from thine own Wisdom or Reason Now having done with this I must go back where I left and there shall find things of another nature you call Enemies to the common Rights and Liberties of Humane Nature Those who permit not every one a free liberty to make Interpretations and Inferences for themselves from Scriptures and this you ground on a false Supposition that Both the Word of God and the best means of understanding it are Originally and Vncontroulably given to every Man For Scripture and Experience convince us that every Man hath not the Word not Means to understand it and therefore 't is neither Originally nor Uncontroulably given to every Man this is a truth which elsewhere I made good and shall by Gods grace be ready again to do upon occasion But besides that it would require some time this is no place to do 't and I ever avoid going from the Question However this I say that ye go upon a Principle destructive to Order if every one must be allowed to believe and profess what he pleases tho' never so
still lay under the Lash for it is a silly Calumny as you say yet 't is no Calumny but a Truth and that no silly one I shall anon take notice of your Stile Deism is not only an absolute denial of all Revelation but also 't is a giving the preference to Humane Reason before Revelation which is done when you set up your own Reason to be a Judge of Revelation and here I hold you fast for else you would give the Slip. Tho' you have not the face to deny Christian Religion to be of Divine Institution yet your own Reason which your Brother calls the only Guide which God hath given us to Judge and Interpret that Revelation you exalt above it Is not this to set up a Tribunal over and above the Word of an Infallible God and to make your poor silly Humane Reason the Oracle or Revealer of the true Sense of that Revelation So I leave you to refute this Charge of Deism as well as you can the Racovian Catechism shall afford you no help except you mince it as you use to do other things which by and by I shall by the Grace of God take notice of A Deist we call him who makes a God of his own reason as you do that is sets up a false God now between such a one and an Atheist there is not the direct opposition which you imagine for in these Times Deist is taken in an ill Sense and in a way of Reproach but to believe a God is no Reproach and ought to be taken in a favourable Sense so 't is the use of the words that shews their signification Besides as there are two sorts of Atheists the one in Theory the other in Practice for as there is a Fool whom David speaks of who saith in his heart there is no God so there is a Fool that saith so in his Actions and lives as if there was no God The like we say of Deists some are Speculative such as believe as you do their own Reason to be the only guide in Matters of Religion others are Practical Deists who accordingly own no other Sense of Scripture but what is their own Interpretation And others through-paced I may add who are both Practical and Theorical Deists and I make no doubt but that ye know well where they live tho' you question much whether we have any of these Socinians in England Profaneness and Immorality follow next Profaneness I call a handling of Holy things without a due Respect which in a high degree is the guilt of Socinians as in several places of my Book I made it plainly appear how bold and sawcy are they with God's Word How contrary to the analogy of Faith the design of the Spirit of God and the natural usual and proper signification of the Words do they wrest Scripture to make it serve their own turn They irreverently use it as a Stalking-Horse to answer their ends and by forcing unusual and far-off-fetch'd Interpretations as much as in them lieth would make it contradict it self This and prefering Humane before Spiritual and Heavenly things like Esau whom Scripture calleth a profane person for selling his birth-right for a morsel of meat I brand with the name of Profaneness and shall not I call so the Preference which you give your Humane Reason above Divine Revelation when you make it to be the Judge of it In some places of your Letters your own Example is a proof of Profaneness attending on Socinianism let the particular of your Jesting at the Name of Christ's mystical Body to signifie the Church serve for all you cannot be but wilfully ignorant how in several places of Scripture an express mention is made of the Body of Christ whereof we are said to be the Members and Christ is called the Head of the Church and the Saviour of the Body This cannot be spoken of his Natural Body which now is in Heaven so it must be of another Body of his and that 's our being in him by Faith and he in us by his Spirit which Scripture calls a Mystery so in Scripture Phrase we may call that a Mystical Body without giving profane Men cause to Jest at it as you do God's Name saith David is Holy and Reverend but ye make bold to profane it As for Immorality it consists both in Words and Actions Carriage and Conversation so that tho' one was not an Immoralist either in every Kind or in every Degree if it be but in one 't is enough to denounce him an Immoralist As for Me who neither have nor desire to have any Society with the professed Enemies or false Friends of Christ I do not meddle with their Actions for 't is not my business but leave every one to God besides that I ever avoid as much as I can making or medling with Persons only with Things But I say that Profaneness is usually attended with Immorality for commonly Sins go by couples and he who is so profane as to Jest with God and his Word is soon drawn to that jesting foolish talking and filthiness which the Apostle joineth together And you may know how Paulus Samosatenus Bishop of Antioch one of your first and great Ringleaders kept young Wenches and allowed his Clergy to do the like Tho' the Persecuting Accuser as I am call'd have not the Wit of Machiavel nor of his Villains yet he hath Truth on his side which is better And the Negative Argument how neither the Racovian Catechism nor Socinian Author hath written so cannot put off the Blow indeed Men must wholly have forfeited common Sense and Reason who in their Writings and in the face of the Sun will set up for Champions of Profaneness Immorality Atheism Impiety Blasphemy or Idolatry But what they do not plainly express is often drawn by good and lawful Consequence in any of your Books you do not say ye are Profane but out of what you say in your Two Letters how that as to your selves you are the Judges of Scripture and that your Reason is your only Guide in giving such Interpretation as ye think fit is not this to make bold with Holy things Tho' I had no other Evidence which yet I am full of I say that only is a sufficient ground for me to conclude your Principles to be Profane which make you prefer your own Reason before the Teaching of the Holy Ghost out of that same Scripture and those who embraced your Principles are thereby led into Profaneness What you say about the Means used by some Men to promote Heresies by high pretences to Piety and Vertue may be true and what I say too every Bait is not proper for every sort of Fish so Men have several ways to get Proselytes according to the several Tempers of those whom they would draw to themselves do but find the predominant Passion of a Man and except God be pleased to strengthen him ye