Selected quad for the lemma: ground_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
ground_n church_n faith_n pillar_n 2,322 5 10.2633 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A81812 The fulnesse and freenesse of Gods grace in Iesus Christ; declared in the point of election, by a middle way betweene Calvin and Arminius, and different from them both, in an uniforme body of divinitie. By Francis Duke.; Fulnesse and freenesse of Gods grace in Jesus Christ. Part 1. Duke, Francis. 1642 (1642) Wing D2501; Thomason E146_23; ESTC R22338 174,028 185

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to the glory of Angells by his receiving Christs righteousnesse the object of life Adam and Eve now remained alone to possesse this day of Grace namely this world as a day of Grace for only with them remained the Oracle of eternall life that is a Promise of the seed to breake the Serpents head therefore this Oracle or object of justification as the ground of all true Religion to discend to posterity was altogether unsetled by reason of Abells ascent to blessednesse and Cains abiding under cursednesse as cut off from Gods presence of Grace for saith hee from thy face shall I be hid so went out from the presence of God therefore Cains Posterity as borne and bred remote from the pillar of truth and life of Religion under their Fathers exemplary concision were carried as a streame to all ungodlinesse wherefore when God gave Eve the next man-childe Gen. 4.25 she called his name Seth that is setled sure as saith Reverend and Learned Broughton in his Treatise upon the first ten Fathers And saith Moses Adam knew his wife againe and shee bare a sonne and called his name Seth for God said shee hath appointed me another seed ●nsteed of Abel whom Caine slew Againe Gen. 5.3 the Text saith Adam begat a sonne in his owne likenesse and called his name Seth implying the production of this Childe every way answered the image of A●ams desire that is to enjoy issue which might stand in the same image or likenesse that himselfe did to enjoy this day of grace as a day of grace to convey the Oracle of life to ensuing posterity and therefore hee joyned with Evah in this childes name and called his name Seth So leaving his minde to posterity in his sonnes name that the conveyance of the pillar of truth was setled sure to future generations Againe also to Seth was borne a sonne and hee called h●s name Enos Kings translation addeth that then men began to call upon the name of the Lord that is Seths posterity began to multiply being the visible Church containing by tradition the pillar of truth or object of Faith once given to the Saints Yet learned Broughton saith the letters of the name of Enos in the appellative signifieth sorrowfull-grievous that is then beganne corruption touching the calling on the name of God The truth is this ground also is good The Kings translation and Bro●ght●ns ●econciled for then began the multiplication of Cains posterity as in number so in corruption by concision touching the calling on the name of the Lord For by their exemplary evill it came to passe that those which were the sonnes of God in the profession of this object of Iustification fell away by affinity with them and this is implyed Gen. 6. where it is said it came to passe when men began to multiply upon the face of the Earth and daughters were borne unto them then the sonnes of God saw the daughters of men that they were faire and they tooke them wives of ●ll that they chose implying not what God liked c. Wherefore Seth seeing the beginning of this evill hee in the appellative letters of his sonnes name left by tradition his minde to the world telling them this was sorrowfull and grievous unto him and all godly men for so it was to En●s wherefore he named his sonne Cainan that is to lament saith reverend Broughton and yet he whose name signified Lamentation named his sonne Mahalaleel that is as the same Broughton saith a praiser of God implying notwithstanding this lamentable object yet to man believing truth there was remaining a two-fold ground of praise to God First for the light of eternall felicity which shined in his guift of Christs righteousnesse imputed the Lambe figuratively slaine from the foundation of the world and all included in the promised seed as the object of Faith once given to the Saints Secondly to praise God for his firme truth in the certaine destruction of the power of Satan although then it remained in a world of sinfull men for it shall breake thy head wherefore this Praiser of God also leaves his minde to the world by tradition in the name of his sonne calling him Iared that is descending saith Broughton foretelling the worlds descent in ungodlines to misery as without hope of returne wherefore this hopelesse man names his Son Enoch as saith Broughton signifying dedicated or consecrated to God implying he would dedicate him and his to God according to truth though the stream of the world run a contrary way following lying vanities forsaking their owne mercies And God answered this happy resolution in his sonne for hee by Faith in the faithlesse world that then was walked with God and he was not saith the Text for God tooke him away that is he never died but in soule and body joyntly ascended to the glory of Angels by which figure being the seventh from Adam God condemned the faithlesse world that hee really and mercifully prepared that glory in eternall felicity for them But they cast it away by their Apostacy from him and gave themselves up to fleshly and terrestriall contentments implied when God saith My spirit shall not alwayes strive with man for that hee also is flesh Therefore Enoch the seventh from Adam prophesied of the destruction of that world saying Behold the Lord commeth with ten thousand of his Saints to execute judgement and to reprove all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against them Jude 14. Wherefore this man leaves his mind by tradition to the world in the name of his sonne also for he called him Methusalah that is as saith Broughton God sends that is his certaine judgement upon the wicked of the world And Methusalah therefore named his son Lamech as saith the same Author signifying striking implying Gods finall stroke to the destruction of the world did now draw neere Againe Lamech prophesied that God would after that destruction by Christ give a comfortable restauration of the world and left it by tradition in the name of his sonne whom he called Noah which signifieth comforter or restorer as saith Broughton Againe by Noah God prepared the Arke which in a figure was Christ implying that although now God set up his flaming sword turning it every way that none could escape namely the flood signified by Noah's building the Arke Yet by this Arke so long a building was farther signified that God would rather glorifie his mercy in their salvation then his justice in their deserved destruction Wherefore Gen. 6. although he saith My spirit shall n●t alwayes str●ve with man for that be also is flesh as the bruit beast for that is implyed yet then he saith his dayes shall be an hundred and twenty yeeres implying so long time he would give them to returne to be accepted in his beloved sonne the Arke of salvation And this
be on an eighth day by his bodies resurrection and therefore then on an eighth day precisely Infants were to be admitted visible members of Christs mysticall body on earth in the Kingdom of grace implying their right by him to his glory (b) Then Infants have much more right to be ●eceived into the Church Militant by Baptisme triumphant in Heaven From which ground when people brought little Children to Christ that he might blesse them hee was angry with the Apostles which kept them from him and commanded them to suffer little (c) Notwithstanding the males onely were admitted to be visible members of Christs body by circumcision yet not onely the women but all the female Infants were then members of Christs body though they received not the seale of the Covenant they being not capable of it in their flesh yet the Grace of the Covenant in Christ received them to be visible members and the ground why that signe of the Covenant was precisely related to the males was to figure that the Lambe of God of the seed of the woman was not to be a female but a male therefore this hinde eth not but that the Infants of believing parents under the Gospel much more may be admitted visible members by baptisme and from the beginning of the world as appeares in the practice of the ten fathers before the flood they esteemed their Infants visible members of Christ for in their infancy they stablished upon their persons by their names the conveyance of the Oracle of life or the object faith once given to the Saints variously to ensuing posterities as appeareth at large in the fifth Chapter of this Treatise Children to come unto him and renders this as a reason of his command for of such is the Kingdome of Heaven therefore so departing this world they ascend to that Kingdome which so belongeth unto them Quest Now the question may be whether circumcision was onely intended to mankinde as in Infancy Answere It was not onely intended unto mankind as Infants but also to men as capable of reason as is Baptisme now for to them it did not ●nely prefigure that the nature of Divels became not totall and the imputed damnation of the Covenant was cut off by Gods mercy in Christ but also to men capable of reason it did prefigure that they submitting in beliefe of truth to receive Gods guift of Christs righteousnesse imputed the●r sinne should not onely be cut off in the habite of sinne in them against Christ weakned in this world and in the next world none (d) Hence it is God adding the law to the promise gave this one law viz. that the Paschal Lambe must be eaten with sowre herbs Exod. 12.8 to remaine but also that they in glory with Christ should ever remaine therefore God to Abraham called the sharpe cutting of the fore-skin of the member of Generation his Covenant meaning that to man believing truth that sharpnesse was a seale of Christs imputed righteousnesse which they received by faith including their vivification and mortification and the ground of all happinesse for so it was to Abraham being circumcised at a full age as Rom. 4 And therefore saith Christ hee that believeth in mee hath eternall life Againe although God cut off the fore-skin of the Member of generation yet but the foreskin for hee left the next innermost skin uncut off this implicitly told men capable of reason that although the grace of the Covenant did cut off the serpentine nature yet hee left a seed to remaine to let men understand that as Abraham could not be justified by workes having this serpentine seed remaining in him therefore in this life man must submit to God guift of Christs righteousnesse imputed as did Abraham for justification and his rule for imitation therefore saith the Apostle being justified by faith meaning men capable of reason we have peace with God through our Lord Iesus Christ by whom also we have accesse by faith into this grace wherein wee stand and rejoyce in the hope of the glory of God Rom. 5.1.2 But the question may be here Quest whether mens sins which themselves commit be against the law naturall as supernaturally related to Gods Covenant with the first Adam I answer no for in the second Adam onely after the fall Answ this law of nature in it's perfections was inherent and was related as a meanes to attaine that supernaturall end and then given to us imputatively for justification in him and a rule for imitation for us and therefore all our sinnes are against that law of righteousnesse so manifested to us in him by the Covenant of grace and not as the law was in the first Adam a Covenant of workes and man capable of reason stands bound so to receive it by beliefe of truth in Christ Iesus or the rejection of this rule cuts him from Christ for be that believeth not is condemned already and that by just consequence because he that is guilty of sinne in one is guilty in all for hee that rejects it in point of justification rejects it also as his rule in point of sanctification and from this ground Moses pronounced that man accursed which did not doe all things contained in the Law that is as not intentionally ayming to doe all things contained in that Law as leading to Christ as hereafter in due place will appeare Yet if man did then or now doth but at least intentionally respect this object of Faith as the truth is in Iesus hee is guilty of none although hee actually sinne in many things wherein we offend all Iam. 3. ● and the ground of the point is this that in Christs righteousnesse imputed and by beliefe of truth received as the truth is in Iesus this man wants no righteteousnesse which in heart hee desires to have in Christ nor is guilty of no sinne which in heart hee desires to be freed from Rom. 7.22.25 and Rom. 8.1 Quest Againe another question here to be resolved will be this that in regard Gods mercifull imputation did remove from all mankinde that imputed damnation of the Covenant for Adams sinne then how farre forth doth it also extend to take off the guilt and punishment of mens owne sinnes individually committed against the Law of grace as it is in Iesus Christ Answ It extends exceeding farre in this case also even to any man submitting by beliefe of truth to receive this gift of righteousnesse as the truth is in Iesus for then it takes off all manner of sinne committed against him one sinne onely excepted for saith Christ All manner of sinne and blasphemy against the Sonne of man shall be forgiven unto men but the sinne against the holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men Mark 3. And the ground why God thus foreappointed Christ before the world was to be ready as the Ram in the bush in that point of time to enter the worke of the Covenant to take off the just
You are not my people they shall be called the children of the living God The Apostle citing their owne Prophet against them implicitly refels their precedent errors in divers respects as first because the Gentiles were not Abrahams seed of Isaack and Iacob and yet were to be children to the living God This therefore proved that Abrahams naturall line after the flesh was not Gods ground of electing Children unto him but the election must be in Christ as before Againe because these Gentiles were to be Children of God which had not Moses Law to obey no not so much as in works conversant about the object of faith and yet were to be Children unto God consequently their works of righteousnes to the Law was no ground of their Election but the election was of him that called them from their Idolatrous denne and gave them the election in the promised seed Againe the Apostle cites the Prophet Isay against them saying though the number of the Children of Israel be as the sand on the Seashore but a remnant shall be saved And because the Apostle referres salvation but to a remnant consequently their discent from Abrahams flesh was no ground of their election for if so then not a remnant but all Israel must have bin saved but being referred to a remnant therefore the election must be as before And saith the Apostle the same Prophet saith God will make a short cut in righteousnesse and except God had left a remnant they had bin as Sodome and like unto Gomorrah implying Gods impartiall proceedings ordinarily with this elect spouse of Christ as betweene Abell and Caine and as to Abraham in the Covenant for cursednes and blessednesse Therefore to this elect Spouse God was no respecter of persons Againe Verse 30. the Apostle saith What shall wee say then that the Gentiles which followed not after righteousnesse have attained to righteousnesse even the righteousnesse which is of faith by force of Gods precedent predestination with Abraham for that 's implyed but Israel which followed after the Law of righteousnesse saith hee hath not attained the Law of righteousnesse and then hee gives the prime reason wherefore because they sought it not by faith but as it were by workes of the Law And he saith they stumbled at that stumbling stone as it is written Behold I say in Sion a stumbling stone and a rocke of offence and whosoever shall believe on him shall not be ashamed these words imply three things First that Israels glory as Gods Israel was grounded onely upon Christ the Stone laid as a pillar of truth on Sion hill Secondly that by remisnesse Israell fell to pride and so from this stone to Abrahams flesh and their own works of the law to be the ground of all their glory and so stumbled at the Pillar of truth Christs righteousnesse imputed to their own destruction Thirdly to those of this Nation that in right beliefe did submit to the righteousnesse of God that is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed the ground of all their glory them God would uphold in honour for saith the Text hee that beleeveth shall not be ashamed So much for opening the ninth Chap. to the Rom. And here by the way observe that this Chapter giveth no ground to Reverend Calvins error namely that God before the world was did personally reprobate the greatest part of mankinde to unrecoverable damnation and personally elected the rest to unavoydable salvation Againe to goe on against their works of righteousnesse to the law about the object of Faith the Apostle opposeth Abrahams example who by Faith in the object of Faith by this Pillar of truth terminated in it as the onely ground of all felicity Rom. 4. Of him he saith What shall we say then that Abraham our Father as pertaining to the flesh hath found for if Abraham were (a) The ground of mans Iustification in this fourth estate is Gods guift of Christs righteousnesse reckoned or imputed to man yet the Iustification of a Sinner is this v●● Gods pardon of his sin guilt and punishment for that Righteousnesse so reckoned or imputed as to all mankind upon our fall in Adam as new to all Infants departing this World but when Iustification is reckoned or imputed to Mans Faith it is because that act of right belief is more connexively related immediately to the object of Iustification then any other act of a beleever And when sometimes Iustification is attributed to Faith it is because a right beleeve●s submissive receptive instrument of Faith is opposed against the pride of mans supposed wo●ks of righteousnesse and in this sense S. Paul Rom. 4. br●ngs in that text Gen. 15. saying it was imputed to Abraham for righteousnes justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God for what saith the Scripture Abraham beleeved God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse Implying hee beleeved all his good from Gods gift in the righteousnesse of the seed imputed and so was that righteousnesse imputed to him to the remission of his sinnes which was his justification and the ground of all felicity Therefore saith the Apostle Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace as it was to Abraham but of debt but to him that worketh not but beleeveth on him which justifieth the ungodly his Faith is counted for righteousnesse Implying that God was Abrahams exceeding great reward only by his gift of the righteousnesse of this seed imputed in the object of Faith which Abraham by beliefe submissively imbraced even as David describeth the blessednesse of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without works saying Blessed are they whose iniquity is forgiven and whose sinnes are covered blessed is the man to whom thee Lord will not impute sinne from verse 1. to the 8. Againe to goe on the Apostle in divers passages of his Epistles shewes this elect Spouse what absurdities do spring from her conceit of the worth of her works conversant about the object of Faith in the Law First as if hee should say suppose you doe believe the Law to be Gods Law and therefore to the Judiciall Laws are obedient to live in some orderly manner Suppose also from the same grounds you are at paines and costs to bring your Sacrifices to the Priests and Levites for your offerings the Law commanding it Also suppose you love God for the wealth of Canaan and love each other being joynt inhabitants of that land yet in all this to you these Laws are not of Faith because you by beliefe rest upon your deed done to be accepted of God as did Cain and terminate in sensuall delights for you are not led from the letter of the Law in right beliefe to rest in Christ his acceptable righteousnesse the proper end of the Law for righteousnesse to man rightly beleeving truth * The same is ●he Gospel now ●o man not rightly beleeving truth for the Law and the Gospel for substance was one