Selected quad for the lemma: ground_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
ground_n call_v church_n pillar_n 2,921 5 10.5182 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A41790 A sigh for peace, or, The cause of division discovered wherein the great Gospel promise of the Holy Ghost, and the doctrine of prayer with imposition of hands, as the way ordained of God to seek for it, is asserted and vindicated, as the interest and duty of Christs disciples in general : in answer to a book intituled A search for schism / by Tho. Grantham ... Grantham, Thomas, 1634-1692. 1671 (1671) Wing G1548; ESTC R39437 69,616 172

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

doctrine of Baptism and of laying on of Hands Of the Resurrection of the dead and of Eternal judgement And what though it be said that other foundations can no man lay than that which is already laid which is Jesus Christ doth this prejudice that use of the word foundation He● 6. 1. not at all Or at least not any more than the Church being called Christ 1 Cor. 12. 12. and the pillar and ground or foundation of the truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. doth prejudice the Son of God his being called Christ or the foundation And are not the Prophets and Apostles called the foundation Ephes 2. 20. of which Christ in the same place is said to be the corner stone And yet surely Christians of ordinary capacity do understand that these sayings do not contradict but agree very well with that saying of Paul other foundation can no m●n lay c. So long as Christ is held to be the Head the all and in all to the Church of God But sith the Searchers do grant and say to my knowledge that they did ever grant that laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. to be a principle of the doctrine of Christ and a part of the foundation which I take to be a good b●sis for a happy composure of our unhappy d●fference It remaineth that the only or chief point of difference lyeth in this what laying on of Hands it is that is called a part of the foundation Heb. 6. 2 Whether laying on of Hands with prayer for the Spirit of promise or some other kinde of laying on of Hands We affirm the first they imagine the latter But now ask them what laying on of Hands they will assign to be meant Heb. 6. 2. and then they either answer nothing at all or else so flatly contradictorily one to another or with such hesitation in themselves as it is to be admired but more to be lamented that such Leaders in Israel as they pass for and to give them their due might well pass for such IF c. should not be able to digest the milk which Babes must feed upon nor can they assign to Babes their Portion therein But instead of Milk they sometimes set before them strong meat even that imposition of Hands which pertains to Bishops in the Church and this as one of the Babes principles which is far from being fit nutriment for them And now that the Searchers may sufficiently shew themselves to be in the dark about that laying on of Hands which they confess to be a principle c. They number up six or seven sorts of laying on of Hands and then puts it to the question Which of all these laying on of hands is intended Heb. 6. 2. and is that which we call a Doctrin● of Christ By which unwary demand no doubt they have led many a simple meaning Christian into a Maze and there left him nor can they possibly give him relief sith they cannot extricate themselves from the same meander and as an addition to their folly they demand that seeing divers men are differently perswaded concerning that laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. Whether this be not a sufficient ground for them to doubt whether that laying on of hands practised by us be instituted by God Which if it be then they have sufficient ground to doubt of all things which they as well as we do hold for Gods institutions For certainly divers men are notwithstanding their interest diversly perswaded of most places of Scripture on which they ground their faith and practise But to leave them in this mist till they being weary shall desire to return to the Lord in this part of his will I shall endeavour to shew plainly what laying on of hands it is which is called a principle of Christs doctrine and a part of the foundation And though the Searchers are pleased to trouble their Readers with a large enumeration of layings on of hands yet they seem at last to be content That that laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. should be one out of two namely either that which was for healing the sick or else that which was for the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit But they rather incline to the first and as for the latter we have shewed there is no such thing nor ever was being a thing out of the reach of mans understanding to whom such gifts do belong and consequently they know not on whom to impose their hands That the laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. should be that on the sick is no way congruous to truth or reason For how should this be one of the first principles of the Oracles of God and Milk for Babes seeing it is more blessed to believe without a miracle than with one but it is not more blessed to be without a principle of Christs Doctrine than to have it and those who would not believe unless they saw them are upbraided for the hardness of their hearts Certain it is That that laying on of hands to heal the sick if necessary yet is prerequisite to faith signs being for them which do not believe and not for them that do But the laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. is subsequent to Faith yea it follows Baptism and that as it is a principle of the Oracles of God therefore it cannot be that which was for the working of miracles Again laying on of hands on the sick is most proper if not only proper for those that are without and therefore not milk for Babes in the Church and consequently not that laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. As for sick persons in the Church of God they are not bid to have hands laid on them but are bid to send for the Elders of the Church that they may pray over them anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord c. And they have a promise that the prayer of faith shall save the sick And what though the healing of the woman Luke 3. 17. and the diseased people of the Island Acts 28. 9 10. may be teaching to all yet this doth not prove that it is a principle appertaining to the beginning of a Christian and to follow his Baptism Nor do I see that it is properly teaching to a Believer as such for what doth it add to the Faith of a Christian who believeth already that Christ hath one far greater things than the healing of a disease For he believeth that he hath overcome death and brought life and immortality to light by the Gospel Indeed to those that doubt whether Christ be the Son of God such a sight may be some way convincing to them But still this is for the begetting of Faith and so not the fourth principle of a Christian We see then that laying on of Hands on persons which are without to work miracles can with no shew of truth be said to be that laying on of hands He● 6. 2. Especially if we consider how it is joyned with
Priscilla and Aquilla having been left there who taught such as were ignorant the way of the Lord more perfectly Apollos also mightily convinced the Jews by the Scriptures that Jesus was the Christ we cannot now reasonably think that Paul would settle those certain Disciples Acts 19. in a Church distinct from the Church at Ephesus already much less in a way or practise contradistinct from the Church and if not then it follows that the Church at Ephesus were also in the practise of prayer with the laying on of Hands as well as those certain Disciples who were now to be laid into the building with the rest which yet is the more considerable if we note that passage in Ephesians 1. 13. which was spoken of the whole Church at Ephesus and shews plainly that they had received the Holy Ghost or Spirit of Promise after they believed the Gospel of their salvation which fully agree with the order wherein the certain Disciples also received the Spirit And here let us not omit that passage Acts 22. 10. 9. 17. Whence it is observable that Paul the elect v●ssel must be sent to Damaseus to be taught the principles or rudiments of Religion by Ananias and particularly in the Doctrine of Baptism and laying on of Hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost not only in repect of the miraculous gifts of Tongues c. For it is a doubt among Christians whether he spake with tongues by vertue of any proper gift or by means of his education But the spirit of love power and of a second mind which he affirms God had given him 2 Tim. 1. 7. And though it is true there was some variaiton in the order of things in Paul's case that is no prejudice to the truth in general there being an emergency which might occasion it and a special allowance from heaven for it at that time Nor may this variation be a president for us to vary in things of this nature having no such occasion for it any more than the Israelites eating the Passover without being cleansed according to the purification of the Sanctuary when an emergency called for it and the Lord allowed it gave them ground to do so again when there was neither the one nor the other nor is it material against ought that we have said that Ananias was no officer in the Church and therefore imposed Hands on Paul by vertue of his gift only For unless we imagine the Church to have greater power than God we cannot deny Ananias to have authority for all that he said and did to Saul Seeing he had immediate mission from heaven which is equivolent to the Churches mission at least Nor is it ●easonable to think that power to act in Gospel Ordinances is so tied to the Church as that God may not anticipate that Order when it pleaseth him And as this chosen vessel was taught the ●udiments of Christianity so he instructed others in the same as we have seen in part and may see yet further in his writing to ●imothy who being under some fears and ●emptations he labours to comfort him from the consideration of the Spirit which God had given him which was the Spirit of love power and of a sound mind which he reminds him of by mentioning the means used for obtaining it which was the putting on of Paul's hands See and consider 2 Tim. 1. 4 5 6 7 8. We are now come to the great Charter of the Church for this point of Faith I mean ●hat Epistle which Paul wrote unto the Hebrew Church who as he himself had learned and taught others concerning the laying on of Hands as we have seen before so he ●uts the first of Gospel Churches in mind of that which they who were to be as a standard to the rest had been taught in respect of their principles as Christians Heb. 5. ●2 and particularly concerning laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. Concerning which particular as I shall have too much occasion to note the differing opinions among the Baptized Congregations so I shall first set down those things wherein they do generally agree or rather that which is granted by the Searchers And first They grant that the doctrine of the Holy Ghost I suppose they mean the Promise of the Holy Ghost was frequently taught as a principle of the Christian faith and they give us no reason why it ought not with like frequency to be taught as a principle of the same Faith now Secondly they grant That that laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. is a principle of the doctrine of Christ and a part of the foundation Now either they must grant that these two to wit the promise of the Spirit and laying on of Hands with prayer to obtain it makes but one principle of Christianity or else they fall into that which they condemn viz. the making seven principles But to say the truth they seem to make these two to be but one yet so as that they would destroy the practick part For they demand whether laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. may not be figuratively understood for the Holy Spirit which was given thereby But the Answer is easie and tells them plainly that ●his is the way to have such a figurative foun●ation as Babes in Christ could never under●tand and then will come in a figurative Bap●ism only Yea a figurative Resurrection too ●ould creep into the Church at the heels of ●he other figures till at last the truth of all ●he principles would stand only for a Cyber But the instance which the Searchers bring ●o strengthen this their figurative interpreta●ion very providentially overthrows it For ●hough the Cup is taken for the Wine and the ●read and Wine for the Body and Blood of Christ ●et we know that the sign and thing signi●●ed do both remain for the use and com●●rt of the Church and why then should ●rayer with the laying on of Hands which 〈◊〉 the sign be made void by the promise of ●he Spirit which is the substance These ●hings premised the Searchers twenty fifth ●emand and the discourse thereon depending 〈◊〉 discerned to be frivolous Because whatso●ver they are pleased to write it is certainly ●nown that their opinion is contrary to that wri●●ng Otherwise it were easie to shew not only the Novelty of their conceit in the said Question but the vanity of such an interpretation of the word foundation as th●re they bring might be discovered For evident it is that the same which is called the first principles of the Oracles of God and milk for Babes vers 12. is called the principles of the doctrine of Christ which pertain to the beginning of Christian men which now the Author would intermit and the foundation which he would not lay again which foundation when he comes to set down in its parts which principles when he comes to enumerate are thus set forth of Repentance from dead works and of faith towards God Of the
advantage And whereas it is much doubted whether laying on of Hands was ever taught or commanded by authority from heaven me thinks this should not be hard to be understood Unless we can be so void of reason as to dream that Peter and John when they came among the Disciples went preposterously from person to person praying and putting their hands upon them and that without telling them what they meant by it Which to do were enough to amaze the Spectators and i● contrary to the glory and gravity of Gospel performances which as they must be acts o● subjections of Faith if they do please God so the faith of such acts or subjections mus● come by hearing with understanding wha● they must do or to what they must submit and to what end And this hearing must be from the Word of God else there i● no ground for Faith or practice in matter of Religion so as to please God But Go● was well pleased with the Apostles acting an● the Samaritans submission in the case of prayer with laying on of Hands and bore witness from heaven that he approved it Therefore their obedience was of Faith Therefore they heard with understanding that what they did was their duty therefore the Lord taught them both concerning the duty and the end thereof That the Apostles should practise with such frequency this service of prayer with the laying on of Hands upon Disciples generally That it should be recorded among the chief of their Acts in promoting the Gospel and setling of Churches that it should be placed among the principles of Religion and all this without authority from heaven is unworthy the followers of Christ or his Apostles to imagine But forasmuch as divers have laboured to satisfie the contrary minded in this point whose works are extant unanswered I shall not insist farther save that I do briefly shew that our Brethren are not consistent with themselves in this particular For they do that themselves which they will not allow themselves to do for they practice laying on of Hands on Officers for which there is as little by way of precept as for the laying Hands on Disciples or rather less For since they do now acquit that Text 1 Tim. 5. 22. as not having any thing to do with the business of Ordination and to strengthen a contrary interpretation do bring the Suffrages of Dr. Hammond Victor Cyprian and the Council of Carthage sure I am they have no Text which hath so much as the face of a precept I mean in so many words for laying hands upon Officers although it is beyond doubt with me that that way was ordained of God to depute his servants in the Ministery to their works respectively wherefore I will conclude this discourse with this Enthememe There is sufficient ground in Scripture for laying on of Hands on Officers in the Church Ergo there is sufficient ground in Scripture for laying hands on Members of the Church And whereas our Brethren do make a shew by their actions out of some ancient Authors as well as Modern as if Antiquity were on their part in this Controversie I will therefore put in something by way of evidence to the contrary as I finde them partly from the Authors themselves and partly from such as have gathered certain sentences out of the works of the Ancients concerning this matter Tertullian to this effect That like as in Baptism the flesh is washed that the soul may be made clean so in laying on of Hands the flesh is overshadowed that the soul may be illuminated by the Holy Spirit In the Constitutions of Clemens there is said to be this passage viz. We must all hasten to be born again to God meaning by Baptism and at length to be signed by the Bishop that is to receive the seven fold grace of the Spirit otherwise a person cannot perfectly be a Christian if carelesly and willingly and not of necessity he remain without it Cyprian speaking of the Samaritans receiving the Holy Ghost by laying on of Hands saith Which also is done with us that they which are baptized in the Church must be presented to those who are set over the Church that by prayer and laying on of Hands may obtain the Holy Ghost Jerom according to Andreas Willet touching laying on of Hands hath these words viz. It hath ever been the Custom of the Church Eusebius hath a passage concerning Novatus who lived about the middle of the third Century how he slighted the imposition of Hands these are his words after mention made of his being baptized he saith He obtained not that which he sh●uld have done according to the Canon or rule of the Church to wit Confirmation by the hands of the Bishop Insomuch then he obtained not that how came he by the Holy Ghost See also to the same effect the seventh book of Eusebius c. 2. For Modern Writers Erasmus in my opinion as he is most clear without mixture in most of his Expositions and particularly in this point he is most clear These are his words upon the principles Heb. 6. 1 2. The first degree unto Christianity is to be repentant of our former life and to forsake sin Next of all it is required that we be taught that true innocency and soul-health is to be hoped for of God Then forthwith that we be purged by Holy Baptism from the filthiness of our sins and rest●red again to the state of innocency then that we receive the Holy Ghost by laying on of Hands and believe the resurrection of the dead to come and also that last judgement that shall award some to eternal felicity and other some to everlasting pains and damnation Diodate hath these words Laying on of Hands was a Ceremony joyned to Baptism for a sign of Blessing and Consecration to God And he calls these principles the first grounds of Christian Catechism and the heads of Christian Doctrine As in Baptism the outward Ministery or mystical washing doth regenerate wash away sins cleanse and purge us from our filthiness so doth the imsition or Laying on of Hands give us the gift of the Holy Ghost but the outward and mystical washing doth onely represent unto us that in Christs Bloud our sins are clean washed away c. From these Testimonies it appeareth that what the Churches of Christ now contend for touching the practice and the subjects and the end of prayer with Laying on of Hands is no novel thing but as the institution of that Ordinance is found in Holy Writ as we have shewed so it hath continued in use as necessary in place the next to holy Baptism among Christians generally AN APPENDIX MEeting lately with a very worthy Brother at East Haddon in the County of Northampton he did much importune me to admit of a short dispute with him about the principle under consideration to whom I consent and he laid down this Assertion That Laying on of Hands