1700. BEING The Seventh for the Year 1700 of the LECTURE Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle Esq By OFSPRING BLACKALL D. D. Rector of St. Mary Aldermary and Chaplain in Ordinary to His MAJESTY LONDON Printed by J. Leake for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1700. St. LUKE XVI 29 30 31. Abraham saith unto him They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them And he said Nay father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead VVHEN I first began to Discourse on these Words I proposed to speak to these three Points I. To shew that the present Standing Revelation of God's Will contain'd in the Books of the Old and New Testament is abundantly sufficient to persuade Men to Repentance if they are not unreasonably blind and obstinate They have Moses and the Prophets I add they have also Christ and his Apostles let them hear them II. To shew that having already such good Grounds of Faith such full Directions for Practice and such strong Motives to Repentance it is an unreasonable Request to desire more Nay Father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And III. Lastly To shew that in case God should condescend to gratifie Men in this unreasonable Desire working every Day new Miracles before their Eyes or sending their deceased Friends to them from the dead to assure them of a future State and to warn them to prepare for it 't is highly probable that very few or none of those who do not believe and are not brought to Repentance by the Preaching and Standing Revelation of the Gospel would be persuaded by this means If they hear not Moses and the Prophets nor Christ and his Apostles neither will they be persuaded tho' one rose from the dead The first of these has been the subject of several former Discourses the second I design to speak to at this time viz. II. To shew that having already such good Grounds of Faith such full Directions for Practice and such strong Motives to Repentance as I have shewn we have in that Standing Revelation of God's Will which is contained in the Holy Scripture it is an unreasonable Request to desire more Nay Father Abraham but if one went unto them from the dead they will repent And the Unreasonableness of the Request which the Rich Man here makes in the behalf of his Brethren viz. That God would be pleased to send one from the dead to preach to them or in general how unreasonable it is for men now a-days to desire or look for more means of Conversion or Motives to Repentance than God has been pleased to afford us in the Standing Revelation of the Gospel will appear if we consider these following things 1. That the Principles of Faith and the Motives to Repentance which we have already being well grounded upon Matters of Fact which have been once already sufficiently prov'd and attested 't is altogether needless that any fresh or further Proof should be given of them and 't is what we never think reasonable to desire in other the like Cases That when God requires us to believe or do any thing and sends a special Messenger to acquaint us with his Will he should grant to this Messenger such Testimonials as are sufficient to satisfie reasonable Men that he is no Impostor but a Teacher sent from God is indeed a thing that may fairly be expected And if God should not do thus we should be excusable in not hearkning to such a Messenger because we could not know whether he was a true or a false Prophet and God does not require neither indeed is it reasonable that we should believe every Pretender to Revelation And the clearest Proof of any Man 's being sent from God to teach us any thing being a Power of doing such Miracles and Mighty Works as are manifestly above the skill and strength of a Man to do it was therefore highly requisite and what might reasonably be look'd for that God should grant such a Power as this to all those whom he has ever inspired with new Light and Commission'd to make any new Revelation of his Will to Mankind And this he has always done He gave this Power to Moses in a large measure because the Matters that Men were to trust him for were many and very considerable He gave it also to some of the succeeding Prophets but in a less measure because their Business for the most part was only to Interpret or to press the Observation of the Law of Moses which had been sufficiently prov'd before And he gave it in the largest measure of all to our Saviour and his Apostles because the Revelation made by them was of Truths very mysterious some of them above the Reach and Comprehension of Humane Reason It was also a Revelation in a manner wholly new even to the Jews themselves and much more to the Gentiles And besides it was a Revelation in many Points to appearance contrary to a former Divine Revelation inasmuch as it ordered the Abolition of many things which had been before enjoyned by divine Authority viz. all the Ritual and Ceremonial Law of Moses And therefore to gain Credit to their Testimony that they were inspired and sent by God to teach such things it was very requisite that they should produce more and more plain and undeniable Testimonials of their divine Mission than Moses himself had done And such Testimonials they had such they did produce working more Miracles and those as I may say more wonderful and Miraculous than Moses and all the Prophets together had wrought before But when these Testimonials had been once fairly produced and examined and by all reasonable Men allowed to be true and sufficient and when Christ and his Apostles had made and published all that Revelation which they were Commissioned to make And when to prevent all misunderstandings of it or mistakes concerning it they had committed it all to Writing and the Men that lived in those times and were capable of enquiring into the Truth of it were well assured that the Books said to be written by the Apostles and Evangelists were indeed theirs and contain'd in substance all the same things and no other which they had before declared by word of Mouth and confirmed by Miracles After this I say when the Divinity of the Revelation was thus once at the first Publishing of it so fully confirmed there was no need that it should be proved any more and all other Proof thereof would have been superfluous because the whole Matter both Doctrine and Proof being once faithfully recorded and those Records well attested there could afterwards be no reasonable Cause to call it again in Question So that the Reason of working Miracles being then ceased it was reasonable that the
Power of working Miracles should cease too at least till such time as God should think fit to make some Alteration in or Addition to his former Revelations which we have good Reason to think he will never do or 'till he should please to undertake the Conversion of those Nations to the Christian Faith to whom the Knowledge of the former Miracles that had been wrought for its Confirmation could not be so well communicated by credible History as it is to us For as was hinted before Credible History is all the Proof and Evidence that we ever think reasonable to require in other Cases of the like Nature As for instance When a new Law is made concerning any Matter it is requisite according to the Custom of our Country that it should pass both Houses of Parliament and that the King should ratifie and confirm it and that afterwards it should be some way so published and promulged that all the Subjects that are then alive should have sufficient Assurance given them that such a Law is made But after this Law has been once so passed and ratified and promulged it is passed and ratified and promulged for ever and no Man is so unreasonable as to expect that every Parliament that is called afterwards should read and pass over again all the Laws that have been made before their Time or that every King that succeeds to the Throne should afresh ratifie and publish all the Laws that were made by all his Predecessors But all the Proof that we ever require of the Authority of any ancient Law is a true Copy of it and a good History or Record of its being made at such a time by such a King confirmed by the Tradition of all the intermediate Ages to our Time which have allowed of its Authority by citing it as a Law of the Land by Pleading from it and by giving Judgment according to it And he who will not allow of the same Proof and Evidence of the Authority of the Christian Institution so many hundred years ago established but would needs have new Miracles and new Revelations to confirm the former is every whit as unreasonable as that Criminal would be who being Indicted upon some Ancient Statute should refuse to plead to his Indictment upon Pretence that he knew not whether there was any such Law or not it being made if ever it was made long before his Time and there being none now alive that were present at the making of it Shew him the Law in the Statute Book why how does he know he 'd say but that the Printers had a mind to put a Cheat upon the Nation by Printing a Law of their own making as a Law made by some of our ancient Kings nay shew him the Original Record still he 'd say There have been abundance of Forgeries in the World and how does he know but that this is one The Record he 'd own perhaps looks like an Ancient Deed and has all the Marks of such Antiquity as it pretends to but after all 't is possible it may be and therefore he cannot be sure it is not a Forgery and 'till he is assured of this he will not plead to an Indictment that is grounded upon it But if the King and Parliament that now are will be pleased to declare that this is a good Law and if he himself may be allowed to be by when they shall declare it or if at least two or three Witnesses that he can trust shall testifie upon Oath that they were present when it was passed into a Law then he will allow it to be a good Law and after that will be content to suffer the Punishment of it if he shall ever again be a Transgressor Now what Man is there that would think this a reasonable Demand Or what Judge or Court would ever allow of such a Plea And yet as unreasonable as it is it is just the same with theirs who pretending to be more wise and cautious than their Neighbours will not allow of the same sort of Proof tho' indeed much better in its kind of the Truth of the Christian Religion but tho' we have as Authentick Histories as any are in the World such Histories as the greatest Adversaries of Christianity have not been able to say any thing to invalidate the Truth of which declare that Christ and his Apostles taught such and such Doctrines and wrought such and such Miracles to confirm the Truth of their Doctrine yet will not believe that the Doctrine of Christianity is true and Divine unless they may have special Messengers sent to them to declare a-fresh all the same things which the Apostles once did and those endued with a Power of working in their sight and presence the same Miracles over again that are said to have been formerly done by Christ and his Apostles to confirm the Testimony that they gave 2. The Unreasonableness of that Request which the Rich Man here makes in the Behalf of his Brethren viz. That God would make a new Revelation for their particular Conversion or in general The Unreasonableness of our now desiring fresh Revelations new Miracles or Apparitions of Men from the dead to confirm the Truth of those things which are already sufficiently proved to us by the Standing Revelation of the Gospel will further appear if we consider That to us who live now in Christian Countries other Grounds of Faith or stronger Motives to Repentance than we have already in the standing Revelation of the Gospel might be inconsistent with the Excellency of Faith might destroy the Virtue of Believing and might be too great a Force and Constraint upon us such as would in a manner take away our Liberty of Choice For there is no Virtue at all in Believing what we see there is no Praise or Thanks at all due for doing what we are driven or forced to do and for us who have already abundantly sufficient Grounds to believe and embrace Christianity to have fresh Miracles wrought every day before our own eyes such Miracles as we could not possibly doubt the Truth of to confirm those Doctrines which are already sufficiently confirmed would not be to persuade us but to force us to be Chistians so that then the State we are now in would not be as God designed it should be a State of Trial for the Trial of Wisdom is when there are some Reasons on both sides and he is the Wise Man who in that Case gives Judgment on that side on which the Reasons are strongest But against what I have now said perhaps it may be objected That the Evidence which we desire of the Truth of Religion is no more than we are told has been already given to some Men particularly to those who lived in our Saviour's and his Apostle's times and we can't see why it would be more inconsistent with the Nature of Faith and Religion now than it was then or how it would more destroy our Freedom
mention as briefly as may be the Answers that have been usually given to these Objections And 1. Whereas 't is said that of some of the Books of the New Testament the Authors Names are not certainly known as namely of the Epistle to the Hebrews and that of others the Authors have been doubted particularly of the second and third Epiâ—tles of St. John To this it hath been answered 1. That the Credit and Authority of a Book depends many times much more upon the good Assurance that we have of the time when it was written and of the Character of the Person that wrote it than upon the certain Knowledge of his Name It is therefore a Matter of no great Conseâ—uence whether the Epistle to the Hebrews was writâ—en by St. Paul himself as is commonly and upon â—ery probable Grounds believed Or as some have â—onjectured by St. Luke his constant Companion Or as others by St. Clemens his Fellow-labourer â—hose Name was in the Book of Life Phil. 4.3 Or as others â—y St. Barnabas his Assistant in Preaching the Goâ—pel Acts 14.14 and who is dignified by St. Luke with the Tiâ—e of an Apostle And so neither is it very maâ—erial whether the Epistles called the second and third Epistles of St. John and commonly believed to be written by the same Person that wrote the first were indeed written by St. John the Apostle and Evangelist or as some have thought by another â—ohn who was made Bishop of the Jewish Christians â—t Ephesus by him For it is sufficient that the Writers of these Books which soever they were of the Persons before-mentioned were of good Ability and Integrity and well instructed in that Doctrine and Religion which they wrote about And of this besides the Testimony of the Ancients there is good Evidence enough in the Writings themselves 2. In Answer to this and to all other Objections of this sort against these or any other Books or Chapters or Paragraphs of the New Testament it hath been farther truly said that there is nothing singular in these Books that there is no Doctrine of Christianity taught in any Part of the New Testament of the Author or Authority of which there hath ever been any Doubt in the Church which is not taught in some other undoubted and uncontroverted Part of the same Book So that if it were granted that those Parts of the New Testament of which there has been formerly any Doubt were still of uncertain Authority our Christianity would suffer no real Loss thereby Only giving up these controverted Places we should sometimes want a good Help to enable us to understand readily those other uncontroverted Places of the New Testament wherein the same Doctrines are but perhaps more briefly or obscurely delivered 2. Whereas 't is said that some Parts of the New Testament have been rejected in ancient Times This is granted But then it hath been shewn that considering by whom they have been rejected and under what Notion and for what Reasons they were rejected this Objection is of no force to invalidate the Authority even of those Parts of the New Testament which have been so rejected and much less of the rest of the Book which has been allowed by all Thus some Portions of the New Testament have been rejected by Hereticks because they contradicted their private and singular Notions Some by Judaizing Christians as the Two first Chapters of St. Matthew because they were not found in that Hebrew Copy of that Gospel which they used and all the Epistles of St. Paul were likewise rejected by the same Persons but not as not written by St. Paul but only because they were written by him whom they looked upon as an Enemy to their Nation because he levelled them with other Nations and as too averse to that Religion which had been introduced by Moses which they continued so wedded to even after their embracing Christianity that they could not but suspect him to be a false Apostle who had so plainly taught the Abrogation thereof And for the like Reasons some other Parts of the New Testament have been likewise rejected by some few Men that is not because they wanted the same Attestation which the other Parts of it had or because it appeared by credible History that they were Spurious but only because they contradicted too plainly some Notions which their former Prejudices or Education had made them fond of So that this Argument against the Authority of the New Testament taken from the Rejection of some Parts of it by some particular Men or Sects is manifestly of no Strength unless there was some good Reason for their Rejecting them And that there was good Reason for it has not yet been shewn but the contrary has been shewn very plainly by the ancient Writers of the Church in several Books written by them in Confutation of those Sects and Heresies which are still extant And 3. Whereas it is further said that some Books which are now receiv'd as Parts of the New Testament were not universally receiv'd in the most early Times when their Authority if they were authentick might have been asserted upon more certain Grounds than it can be now viz. the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of St. James the 2d of St. Peter the 2d and 3d. of St. John the Epistle of St. Jude and the Book of the Revelation This is likewise granted But in Answer to it it is said 1. That there is good Evidence from Antiquity that these controverted Books were receiv'd in the most early Times by those who had the best Opportunity of satisfying themselves of the Authors and Authority thereof viz. by those to whom they were sent and in general by the whole Greek Church 2. That it is no Wonder that these Books being written either to Christians dispersed and consequently only published by giving out Copies thereof to some to be communicated as there was Opportunity to others or else to private Persons living perhaps at great Distance from the Places from which they were sent were not so easie to be attested and upon that Account were not at first so generally receiv'd as the others were which were either written to particular Churches to which the Authors Hands and the Messengers that brought them were well known or which were first published and receiv'd in the same Places where they were written And 3. That even those Churches which did for some time doubt of the Authority of these Books were persuaded at last to receive them as the Authentick Writings of the Apostles or other Inspired Men. If therefore it be supposed that while they doubted of these Books they had Reason for their Doubt that is that they did it because they were not as yet fully satisfied that they were Apostolical Writings which the Objectors I believe will readily enough grant it may be very reasonably presumed that they had afterwards greater Reason to lay aside their Doubt and that when they did receive
Matters of Fact which they have recorded And 3. That if the Matters of Fact related in the New Testament are true they are sufficient Proofs of the Truth and Divine Authority of all the Doctrines that are therein taught And I hope enough was said the last time to shew that we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of the New Testament were written by those Persons who are said to be the Authors thereof What I am next to do is 2. To shew that there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to these Authors in their Relations of those Matters of Fact which they have recorded And I hope none of you that hear me whom I presume to be all Christians will take Offence at it if now while I am arguing this Point I sometimes speak of the Holy Evangelists with the same Freedom that might be used in speaking concerning any other Authors and if I sometimes Plead for no more Credit to be given to them in their Relations than is fit and reasonable to be given to any other Historian that was naturally as well furnished and qualified to write a true History as they were and whose Fidelity and Veracity is as well attested and confirmed other Ways as theirs was For you will consider I hope that my Business is now with Infidels with whom we can argue only upon the Principles of common Reason And tho' we who are Christians already do believe as one of the first Principles of our Religion that these Sacred Writers were divinely and supernaturally assisted in their Work and that upon that Account they deserve much greater Credit in what they have written than other Historians do yet this is what those who are yet Infidels will not allow And in Disputation nothing is to be presumed on one side but what will be readily allowed by the other Party So that the divine Inspiration of the Evangelical Writers and the supernatural Assistance which we believe they had in their Writing cannot as yet be regularly insisted upon as an Argument to gain them Credit But it is what will easily be granted afterwards when the Truth of their History shall be well established upon other Grounds as I hope it will be in the following Discourse and 't is what may then serve to procure a religious Respect and Reverence to these Sacred Writings 1 Thess 2.13 and to ingage us to receive them not as the Word of Men but as they are in Truth as the Word of God But this one thing nevertheless I suppose I may presume viz. that if the Books of the New Testament the Historical Parts of it in particular were written by those Authors to whom they are ascribed which has been already proved the Matters of Fact recorded by the Evangelists in Writing are the same which they and the other Apostles testified by Word of Mouth in their Preaching For it cannot I think with any Reason be suspected that their Preaching and Writings were disagreeable to each other because such Disagreement would most certainly have utterly destroyed the Credit of them both And this being supposed I hope it will clearly appear that there is abundantly sufficient Reason to give full Credit to these Writings if these following things be considered 1. If we consider the Nature Conditions and Circumstances of the Matters that are recorded in the Historical Books of the New Testament and of the History its self 2. If we consider the good Capacity that the Authors thereof were in to know the Truth of the things they have related 3. If we consider the strong Obligations they were under to write nothing but the Truth according to the best of their Knowledge or Information 4. If we consider the good Evidences that we have of their Honesty and Faithfulness And 5. Lastly If we consider the Confirmation that was given to the Truth of their History by God himself 1. I say the Evangelical History will appear to be highly credible if without any Regard as yet had to the Ability and Integrity of its Authors we only consider the Nature Conditions and Circumstances of the Matters therein recorded and of the History its self Concerning which there are two things especially that may be observed 1. That the Matters recorded by the Evangelical Writers are such as might be certainly known And 2. That they are such and in such manner related by the Evangelists that if their History of them had been false it could never have gained Credit in the World 1. First I say the Matters recorded by the Evangelical Writers are such as might be certainly known I mean either by the Historians themselves or by those from whom they had their Information For 1. They are for the most part plain Matters of Sense which those who were present at them could have no doubt of without Distrusting their own Faculties of Hearing or Seeing and which those who testified them might be as certain of the Truth of as we can be of any thing that we hear with our own Ears or see with our own Eyes For thus whether our Saviour gave out himself to be the Messias foretold by the Prophets whether he said that he was the Son of God and whether he uttered those other Speeches which the Evangelists have recorded as spoken by him could not but be certainly known by the People who often heard him and especially by his Apostles who constantly attended him And so likewise whether he did those many wonderful Works which the Evangelists have recorded of him could not but be known by those that were present with him They might be certain either that he did them or that he did not do them Thus for instance it might be certainly known to those that first affirmed that he gave Sight to the Blind whether those Persons had been once blind and whether afterwards they â—aw and to those that witnessed that he gave Strength â—o the Cripples whether the Men whom they said he wrought this Cure upon had been Lame or disabled â—n their Feet Hands or Body before and whether â—fterwards they walked and had Strength like other Men and to those that testified that he raised the Dead whether the Persons said to have been raised by â—im had been truly dead and whether afterwards â—hey lived But above all his own Resurrection which the preâ—ent Season as well as the Wonderfulness and Imporâ—ance of the thing obliges us to have a special â—egard to was a thing that might be most certainly â—nown to those that pretended to be Witnesses of it This Sermon was Preached on the Monday in Easter Week â—hey might be certain whether he had been once dead â—nd whether he shewed himself alive after his Passion â—y many infallible Proofs and was seen of them forty Days Of this they might be rather more certain than â—f any other of his Miracles because it was a thing â—ot to be judged of by one sense only as some of the â—est were
of the Apostles or else in after Times And if they were destroyed by the Christians this must have been done either soon after they were written or else after they had been for some time receiv'd and allow'd as true Histories by the Adversaries of the Christian Faith Now if it be suppos'd that these Books were not written till a good while after the Apostles had preach'd and the Evangelists written the Gospel they were written too late to be of sufficient Authority to weaken the Credit of the Gospel-History For how could those that were not born when the things recorded in the Gospel were said to be done pretend to contradict the Testimony of those who were living at that time and who testified either that they saw them with their own Eyes or that they receiv'd that Account of them which they publish'd from very credible Persons who said they had been Eye witnesses thereof But if it be supposed that these Books were written sooner even as soon almost as the Evangelists wrote or the Apostles began to publish by their Preaching the Gospel History then I say 't is impossible they should be suppress'd and destroy'd by the Christians either then or afterwards Not then for tho' we grant that Christianity from the very first Preaching of it made a very swift Progress in the World and from a Beginning no bigger than a Grain of Mustard-seed grew up quickly to be a goodly Tree shadowing many Nations under the Branches of it yet it did not spring up like a Mushroom in a Night it did not grow to this Bigness all at once And what were the Christians in the weak and infant state of the Church but an Handful of Men in Comparison with their numberless Opposers and those too without Wealth without Power of no Interest or Esteem in the World that they should undertake to corrupt or stifle the Evidence that was given against them which was supported by the Secular Power and gladly receiv'd and embrac'd by all other Men but themselves What were they that they should be able to call in all the Books that had been written against them and to suppress and destroy them at their pleasure and that too so fully and effectually as that with the Books themselves which they destroy'd all Memory of them should likewise perish A powerful and prevailing Party with the Government on its side may indeed do much in this kind and yet hardly so much as this But they that believe the Christians to have been such a powerful and prevailing Party early enough to hinder the spreading and dispersing of any Books that were written against them believe without any Ground or Warrant from History a more unaccountable and incredible thing than any that is recorded in the Gospel But if this could not be done then it might perhaps be done afterwards For in progress of Time 't is certain it may be said that the Christians did come to be of very great Power and Interest and able to bear down all their Opposers and 't is likely enough that then they might set themselves to destroy all those Monuments of Antiquity whereby their fabulous Gospels had been contradicted and disprov'd And 't is not incredible that they should so far succeed in their Attempt as to leave no means to Posterity to discern how weak and sandy a Foundation their Religion was built upon But this Supposition taking it altogether involves a greater Difficulty and supposes a greater Miracle than the former did For whatever the Christians might attempt to do or whatever they might be able to do after they had attained to such great Power and were become the most numerous and prevailing Party 't is utterly incredible that they ever could have attained to such great Power that they ever could have become the most numerous and prevailing Party if indeed the Gospel History had almost from the very Beginning been opposed and contradicted by other Histories that were more credible than the Gospel History was For it must be and is granted by all that at the first Preaching of Christianity all worldly Power and Interest were on the other side and engaged most strongly to hinder the Growth and spreading of it Now when Truth is on one side and Power and Interest on the other 't is not impossible that Truth may at last prevail against Interest and bring the Power also to be of its side But if Truth I mean that which hath most Appearance of Truth I say if Truth and Power and Interest are all on the same side from the Beginning as it must be allowed they were by those who say that the Gospel History was quickly prov'd false by other Histories written and publish'd about the same time than I say it is utterly impossible that an Imposture quickly discover'd to be an Imposture and which serv'd no worldly Interest should ever have so gained ground as Christianity did against that apparent Truth and mighty Power and Interest that were on the other side So that whatever Progress Christianity might have made for a short time at first by reason of the Boldness and Confidence of its first Preachers it must needs be that immediately from and after the Time that the Anti-Gospel Histories of better Credit and Authority than the Gospel History was were publish'd it must have declined much faster than it had before increased and in a very few Years have so dwindled to nothing that 't is like in the Age in which we live there would hardly have been so much as any Remembrance of it left And now if nothing more could be said upon this Subject for I have not time at present to take into Consideration the other Proofs before hinted at of the Truth of the Gospel-History I think what has been said already is enough to shew that there is sufficient Reason to give full Credit to the Evangelical Writers in their Relations of those Matters of Fact which they have recorded This I 'm sure of that upon much less Evidence and Assurance of Truth than we have in this we generally give Credit to other Histories For we believe other Historians in their Relation of such Matters as they could not have so certain Knowledge or so good Assurance of as the Evangelical Writers might have of those plain Matters of Fact and Sense which they have related in their History And again we believe other Historians giving an Account of things which they do not pretend to have had a personal Knowledge of which were done in Countries far Distant from them and in Times long before them which their Readers had no Means to enquire into the Truth of which were done in secret or when but few were by and which if they were falsly related none were engaged by any Worldly Interest to be at much Pains to disprove And lastly If two Historians of the same Antiquity give different or contradictory Accounts of the same Matter we do not for that Reason
our Freedom of Choice and with it the Virtue and Excellency of Believing for 't is not Faith to believe what we see and feel and 't is no Commendation to a Man to be good and Virtuous if his Virtue be not the Fruit of a wise Judgment and a free Choice which it would not be if his Judgment was over born by irrefragable Demonstration And if that farther Proof and Evidence that is desired of the Truth of Religion be no other than such as will leave us a Freedom of Choice and a Possibility of Doubting then I say 't is not likely it should be more convincing to us than that which we have already in the Standing Revelation of Holy Scripture For it may be considered further in the second Place 2. That the Proof and Evidence already given us of the Truth of Religion is such as cannot fairly be excepted against and that there is no Proof thereof that could be given us unless it be such as is not resistible and consequently such as is not fit for God to give us while we are here in a State of Trial but what is liable to foolish Cavils and unreasonable Exceptions so that consequently the same Temper and Disposition of Mind and the same unwillingness to believe which now disposes Men to Infidelity and prompts them to make Exceptions to the present Grounds of the Christian Faith would work the same Effect in case other Proof and Evidence were given of the Truth of it I say first That the Proof and Evidence already given us of the Truth of the Christian Religion is such as cannot fairly be excepted against To shew this has been the Design of several former Discourses Serm. III IV V VI. And therefore to what has been said I shall only adde that if the Exceptions that are made to the Evidence already given us of the Truth of the Christian Religion were fair and reasonable they would be allowed by Mankind to be so in other Cases of the like Nature which yet they are not Nay if they who make these Exceptions in the Case of Religion did themselves think that they were just and reasonable they ought to make the same in all other Cases that are equally liable to the same Exceptions and in all other such Cases they ought to live and act as if they had the same Doubts and Scruples upon them which they say they have in the Case of Religion But we see the quite contrary every Day we live For that same Infidel who will not allow of the Testimony which was given to our Saviour by his Apostles tho' they gave the best Assurance that it was possible for Men to give both of their Knowledge of what they testified and of their Honesty in relating it yet readily allows that in all other Cases the Testimony of two or three Credible Persons should be received without any collateral Evidence of the Truth of their Testimony and thinks it reasonable that all Disputes and Controversies among Men concerning their Civil Rights their Estates nay and their Lives too should be thereby determined And he that questions whether the Books of the New Testament were written by the reputed Authors yet makes no Question but that other Books of as ancient or older Date and of the Authority of which there is not half so much Traditional Evidence were written by those Persons to whom they are ascribed and he would think those very unreasonable Men who when he was arguing any Point of Learning with them upon the Authority of Virgil or Cicero or Seneca should refuse to admit his Argument till he had first undeniably and demonstratively proved that the Aeneids were written by Virgil or that the other Pieces that have been allowed in all Ages ever since to have been written by Cicero or Seneca were not falsly Fathered upon those Authors The Infidel who doubts of the Truth of the Gospel-History at the same time has no Doubt at all of the Truth of other Histories as ancient and much more possible to be false and of the Truth of which there is not the hundredth part of thâ—t Evidence that there is of the Truth of this And he that pretends to be uncertain whether there ever was such a Man as Jesus of Nazareth and whether he said and did the things Recorded of him by the Evangelists and whether by the Preaching of his Apostles he did spread his Spiritual Empire over all the Countries of the World An Empire which is still kept up in most of the Countries over which it was first extended and of which there are evident Marks and Memorials still remaining even in those Countries that have since revolted from it He I say that doubts of these things altho' witnessed by the Writings of those who were Eye-Witnesses thereof yet makes no Doubt but that there was such a Man as Alexander the Great who lived above three Hundred years before and that he translated the Empire of the World from Persia to Greece and he also gives full Credit to the other things which he finds related of him by Curtius Plutarch and Arrian altho' none of these Authors were Eye-Witnesses of his Wars and Greatness but either Copied what they wrote from former Histories or took it up from Report and altho' there are perhaps no Remains of that Empire now left in the World And if he was but as sure of a good Estate as that the History of Alexander's Expedition and Conquests is in the main a true History he would not I believe give the Hundreth Part of its Value to ascertain his Title to it Those therefore are manifestly unreasonable Exceptions to the Proofs of Christianity which no Man will allow which even those that make them in this Case do not think reasonable to make in other Cases of the like Nature so that it is not at all likely that any Person that is not convinced by these Proofs should be convinced if more were given For as I farther noted there is no Proof that could be given us of the Truth of the Christian Religion unless it be such as is not resistible and consequently not fit for God to give us while we are here in a State of Trial but what is liable to foolish Cavils and unreasonable Exceptions This I think is so self-Evident that nothing plainer or more undeniable can be said to prove it For tho' the Demonstration of the Truth of Religion were as plain as Demonstrations in the Mathematicks yet even these may be cavil'd at by such as will allow of no Postulata's nor grant the Truth of the clearest Axioms Nay there have been Scepticks in the plainest Matters of Sense and some have denied Motion at the same time that their own Tongues were moving to deny it Not that I think the Demonstration of the Truth of Religion is as clear as any Propostion in Euclid or as the shining of the Sun at Noon for that can't be and I have