Selected quad for the lemma: ground_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
ground_n	believe_v	faith_n	reason_n	4,345	5	5.9961	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A26960	More reasons for the Christian religion and no reason against it, or, A second appendix to the Reasons of the Christian religion being I. an answer to a letter from an unknown person charging the Holy Scriptures with contradictions, II. some animadversions on a tractate De Veritate, written by ... Edward Herbert, Baron of Cherbury ... / by Richard Baxter.	Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.; Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691. Reasons of the Christian religion.	1672 (1672)	Wing B1313; ESTC R4139	63,611	190

ye for I know that ye seek Jesus which was Crucified he is not here for he is risen as he said Come see the place where the Lord lay and go quickly and tell his Disciples that he is risen from the dead and behold he goeth before you into Galilee there shall you see him so I have told you And they departed quickly from the Sepulcher with fear and great joy and did run to bring his Disciples word and as they went to tell his Disciples behold Jesus met them see Mat. 28. 1 5 6 7 8 9. v. Whether I say was this which is written in St. Matthews Gospel that I have here Transcribed said to the Women and that the Women returned from the Sepulcher to tell the Disciples before that Mary M●gdalen said to him that she supposed to be the Gardiner If thou hast born him hence tell me where thou hast laid him and I will take him away John 20. 15. or whether there be any error of Transcribers Translators or Printers in those Texts if not how may I understand them to be true reports Sir I shall trouble you with no more but these few places which I have proposed in three Questions or Particulars although there are several other Texts that I do not understand how they may be reconciled but if you shall by strength of Argument Grounded upon sound Reason make appear that it was nothing but Ignorance hath made me to think that those Testimonies agree not but are contrary one to the other and that they may be so understood as that no such thing will appear in them then I shall be ready and will with you conclude and say so too and for the future suppose that other places of those books which are received for Scripture as seem to be contrary to one another may be Reconciled though I do not understand how But on the contrary if you do not endeavour by such sound and plain Arguments to make it appear that these Texts here Transcribed by me may be understood so as that no contradiction is in them I must think that it was nothing but Ignorance that made you say that which you have said in answer to that and some other objections Therefore I humbly and earnestly pray and beseech you both in defence of your own writings as also in defence of those Books in which you say you think that no one error or contradiction in any matter can be proved to make it appear in truth and plainness If you judge I have erred from the truth I hope you will endeavour to to convert me from the error of my way if any such be which if you shall do no doubt but it will be a good work see James 5. ult Sir It is your advice that in such kind of Scruples the doubtful should apply himself for satisfaction to some Minister therefore do I write to you and if you shall not give me a gentle and plain Answer I shall be discouraged to make my Scruples known to any other therefore in expectation of your plain Answer I Remain Your Loving Friend in the Bond of Peace SIR TWo sorts of persons use to trouble me and others with their Objections against the Christian Religion First Some Papists who profess to believe it but in designe do act the part of Infidels that they may loose men from all Religion in hope to bring them over to theirs when they have taken them off all other For he that can make another man believe that he was hitherto totally misled is likest to become the Master of his Faith For men are apt to think that none can so easily and certainly shew them the truth as he that hath shewed them their error And when men once think that according to the Grounds of the Reformed Churches they can have no certainty of Faith they will the easilier be brought to the way of those men who promise them that certainty which they make them believe that others want Secondly The other sort are Infidels who of late are grown numerous and audacious and look so big and speak so lowd as to acquaint us that it is not they that are silenced in their speaking place nor driven five miles from every City and Corporation Which sort you are of I know not I read your name and that you are a Sojourner but finding that you write not as a tender Doubter who desireth to be concealed but as a Confident gain-sayer of the Christian Verity and not knowing how safely to send a Letter to the place where you say you sojourn I have thought that it will be most pleasing to you to come to you by the same way as the book did which you except against which was written upon the provocation of a paper Scattered among the Schollars of Oxford when the Oxford Oath and Act were made in the time of the great Plague as by one that was unsatisfied in the Grounds of Christianity but I strongly suspected was written by a Papist it was made so suitable to their designs In two things you have not dealt righteously and ingeniously with me 1. In that you have not answered the Grounded Proofs of the Christian Verity which I have laid down but nibble at the Answer to some Objections which is not the way of a Lover of the truth 2. In that you take no notice of or make no answer to the second part of my answer to that same objection about supposed Contradictions in the Scriptures where I shewed you at large that if that which you object were granted it would not overthrow the certainty of the Christian Faith Both those should have been done by an impartial man The method which the nature of the Cause requireth me now to use in my answer to you shall be in the manifesting these following Propositions Prop. 1. That if it could not by us be proved that every word of the Scripture is true nor the pen men infallible or indefectible in every particle yet might we have a certainty of the Christian Religion Prop. 2. That yet all that is in the Scriptures as the word of God is certainly true and no error or contradiction can be proved in it but what is in some Copies by the fault of Printers Transcribers or Translators Prop. 3. That he that first proveth the Truth of the Christian Faith by solid evidence may and ought to be certain of that truth though he be not able to solve all soeming contradictions in the Scripture or answer all objections which occurre Prop. 4. The true method of one that would arrive at certainty and not deceive himself and others is to lay first the fundamental proofs and examine them till he is thereby confirmed and afterwards to try the by-objections as he is able And not to begin first at the answering of such by-objected difficulties and judging of all the cause thereby Of these I shall now speak in order And whereas you bespeak Plainess and

doctrine of the Gospel Ergo it is true as attested by the spirit of God I said before the first is a natural Verity The second proposition is partly of sense and partly of internal and partly external experience as is largely manifested Now as to the Question First No doubt but our Natural faculties must be used in trying supernatural Truth Secondly No doubt he that disputeth with or preacheth to an unbeliever so as to prove what he delivereth to be true must deal with him upon some common principles which both parties are agreed in or else there is no room for proof or for dispute Thirdly But some persons are so ignorant of those certain principles which infer the truth of Gospel revelation that they have need first to be convinced of them which must be done by inferring them from the first truths or some principles which they do confess Fourthly And as a man would convince others by the same method and arguing he must convince himself and try the truth which he is in doubt of Fifthly But if any should mean First That nothing is true in the Gospel but these common principles of nature Secondly Or that nothing else can be proved true Thirdly Or that it would prove any pretended prophesie vision or revelation true so be it they do not contradict the common truths All these are palpable untruths VII Quest Whether these common Verities inferre not the truth of Christianity Answ This is sufficiently answered in the last Perhaps the few Verities mentioned by the Author are not enough to prove Christianity by But that it hath true evidence in sense and reason is manifested heretofore And I believe that he that will by just argumentation follow on the Christian cause with an unbeliever if he can hold him to the point from rambling and suppose him capable of Historical evidence may drive him to yield or to deny common principles yea to deny that God is God and that man is man and consequently that there is any being But the evasion will be by denying notorious matter of fact which therefore must be proved by its proper evidence IX Quest Whether they are necessary conditions of the certain knowledge of a divine Revelation First That it be made immediately to my self Secondly And that I feel a divine afflatus in the Reception as is said Page Answ No A Revelation made to others may be certainly notified to me else if an Angel from Heaven should appear to all men in the Town and Country save one or if all save one saw a thousand miracles to confirm a Revelation yet that one could not be sure of it But I have by abundance of arguments in a peculiar disputation in a Treatise called the unreasonableness of unbelief long ago fully proved the negative And again in my Reas of the Christian Relig. therefore I will not weary the Reader with repetions X. Quest Whether any concurrence of moral evidence at least such as Gospel Revelation hath do truly amount to natural or certain evidence De Rev. Verisim Answ. This Question too I have plainly decided in the Reas of Christian Relig. I now add First The name of moral evidence is here taken by those that use it for that which dependeth on the credit of a voluntary Agent as such And the name of natural evidence signifieth that which dependeth on the nature of the Object in it self considered But I somewhat doubt whether all that use the distinction do commonly understand the difference or what they say Secondly Note that the All or effect of a voluntary Agent hath nevertheless a natural Evidence when it is done or existent If I voluntarily speak or write or go my Action is naturally evident to those that see and hear it as present sensitive Witnesses of it If I freely build a House it is nevertheless naturally Evident when it is built Al things existent in the universe were made by God as a free Agent and yet are nevertheless naturally evident Thirdly Every thing that is when it is if corporeal is naturally Evident to those that have their faculties in those conditions that are necessary and have the object in its necessary magnitude cognation detection site distance medium and abode Fourthly The judgement that is made upon sense it self faileth as this noble Author hath well opened when either the Object the Evidence the Sense or the Intellect want their necessary conditions or qualifications else not Fifthly The Fountain of all Freedome and Morality is the Will of God And yet the moral Evidence of truth which is in Gods word when known to be his word is as sure as any natural Evidence of the thing There being the surest natural evidence ab effect is at least that there is a God most perfect that cannot lie Sixthly The Essences of all things are but imperfectly evident to us The existences of corporeal things that are present and duly qualified are fully evident The existence of things absent beyond the reach of sense is evident only to the discursive intellect not by the immediate natural evidence of the things themselves but by a borrowed evidence from Causes or Signes Discourse improving the Fundamental common truths for the knowing of the rest by proving a certain connexion between them The Praterition of things and the Futurition are both like the distant existence unknown to sense and the immediate apprehension of the intellect And therefore must both be known also by collection as conclusions in discourse or not at all Seventhly Man was not born to know only things present in their existence by sense but also to know things absent things as past and things as future And herein he chiesly differeth from a Bruit Eighthly Though the understanding is most confident of things sensible present yet about things absent past and future it oft doubteth more and is less satisfied in its own conclusions from natural principles than from moral Because sometimes the natural Principles themselves though not the first yet the second or third may be so obscure as to leave the mind unsatisfied Secondly And the connexion among many particulars may be obscure and doubtful Thirdly And in the long Series of collection or arguing the understanding suspecteth its own fallibility so that when Conclusions are far fetcht though from natural Principles the mind may be still in doubt about them And on the contrary when in the way of Revelation the grounds are clear and the understanding hath fewer Collections to make and a shorter journey to go it may be far better satisfied of the truth Ninthly Man 's own necessity is the reason why God doth give us supernatural Revelation and call us to know by the way of Believing For First Most men are naturally dull Secondly Few have leisure by Learning to improve their intellects Thirdly And fewer have leisure disposition to exercise them by long searches argumentation upon every thing that they should know Fourthly And