IT is not misapplyed that of Prov. 9. 1. Wisdome hath built her house she hath hewen out her seven pillars c. But of this enough Now I come to the greatest and last title of the Church The ground of the Trueth Now I am to treate of the Church IV Title The ground of the truth under this notion and because this is most materiall I must insist a little on it And the rather in that the Moderne Jesuits affirme that wee Protestants abhorre to reade this and that this TEXT is so pungent that wee flee from the literall sense of it Therefore this shall be my Method First I am to cleare the words of this Title II. To propose that grand question that falls pertinently 1. The Title is explained here to bee discussed which is Whether this ground can make a ground or grounds III. I must cleare some other doubts proposed here that by way of vindication Then IV. Some vses to be made of this assertion That Gods Kirk is the ground of the trueth As to the first The greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by some is rendered Fundamentum by others better Firmamentum in latine As Whitak Contr. 4. q. 5. Criticks distinguish between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus That the first is properly rendered a ground the second properly a seat applying the word ground to the trueths existing and revealed and applying the word seat to the Church according to what wee reade Matth. 22. 2. of Moses Chayre or seat Of the which Criticisme P. Bayne gives this reason in Comment on Ephes 2. 19. 20. That which so supports all as that it is not supported in a right and strict notion is a ground so Maimonides call his booke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that which so The ground of grounds supports as that it is supported is properly a seat and receptacle or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but improperly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a ground Yet wee shall vse it as it is here in the English rendered Theophylact. Beda P. de Aliaco Chaloner explicate this TITLE thus The Church is the ground of trueth because supernaturall divine trueths are in it we lean to the Church as to the seat of trueth but not to it as to the lowest and chiefest ground why these trueths are trueths D. F. Whyte 3. Conf. p. 4. clears this well thus The pure Apostolick Church was the pillar and ground of trueth simply intierly fully in all things but the subsequent and the Moderne Churches is onely so with limitation that is conditionally that is in so farre as they deliver Apostolick doctrines the Apostles were exempted in all their decisions from all errours but the Fathers and Councels are onely so in so farre as they adhere to the trueths written by Prophets and Apostles And indeed what hee sayes is all granted by the more moderate PAPISTS as by Occam Cusanus Picus Gerson IT was the old doctrine Ground 1. Personall 2. Doctrinall 3. Ministeriall of CHRYSOST Homil. 49. on Matth. Let no man beleeve Churches but in so farre as they lean to the Scriptures if thou wouldst know where is the true Church then flee and run to the Scriptures But yet further to cleare this NOTE as Davenant well observes That there is a threefold ground of trueth 1. Is Personall and that is Christ I. Cor. 3. 11. Isai 28. 16. 2. Is doctrinall and that is the Scriptures see Ephes 2. 20. 3. Is Ministeriall and that is Pastors Fathers Councel-determinations and all their right Superstructures that is so farre as they are conforme to the scriptures I. Cor. 3. 10. Let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon As for the second I answere this question negatively Whether II. Can the church mak or creat grounds 1 Reason the Church can make Fundamentals that is if it can produce and procreat that to be a fundamentall now which before was never received as such Now the Reasons of my deniall are these 1. I ground on the judgement of these WRITTERS wherof the first is Vincentius Lyrin who in his book anent profane Novelties chap. 3. hath these words The Church addes nothing diminishes nothing changeth nothing cuts not off necessars proposes not superfluous things losses not her own usurpes not that which belongs to others but every way cares to polish what was informed of old to cōfirme what is expressed and revealed and to keep what is defined and confirmed yea this the Church still intends that whatever was simply beleeved before should afterwards be more carefully beleeved And after him G. Occam in his Dialogues Neither sayes he the whole Church nor a Generall Councell nor the Pope can make an Article of faith Bellar. also lib. 2. de Concil cap. 12. The Councells when they define do not make any point defined to be of infallible trueth but they onely declare it to be so To all which three worthy sentences we subscribe If the Church could make fundamentalls then it could unmak 2 Reason them but the more moderate of the Papists deny this upon this ground that it belongs to the same power both to creat and annihilate And so they reject that non obstante of the Councel of Constance grounding on that of Scotus 1. dist 11. q. 1. Trueth was of faith before heresie had a beeing so that the determination of the 3 Reason Kirk doth not make a trueth though it define against an heresie 3. That which the Kirk declares is either extra or intus If it be without the nature of the thing declared then its declaration of the thing is false and so it cannot be fundamentall if it be within the compasse and nature of the thing declared then it is yet onely in that kinde fundamentall seing the declaration whatever it be is posterior to the nature of the thing That is but a sillie Evasion of some to wit that the declaration of the Church maketh a point fundamentall quoad nos nay it doth not that as the same F. White well proves ibid. p. 9. For no respect to us can varie the foundation if the thing be not fundamentall in the nature of it the Kirks declaration doth not make it so to us Since then the Kirk hath no reall detracting power no more as said is can it have any reall 4 Reason adding power since both are alike forbidden Deut. 4. 2. 4. All credible points are at last resolved into Scripture therfore it is it that makes fundamentalls CYPRIAN speaks appositly to this purpose lib. de Bapt. All Ecclesiasticall discipline hath its rule frō the Scripture here it is bred and borne and hither it must returne Camerarius lib. 1. Sent. d. 11. q. 1. Theologicall principles are the very trueths of the sacred Canons because the last resolution of Theologicall discourse is made unto them and out of these trueths firstly each Theologicall Proposition is deduced
QUEST What to judge of Creeds and Confessions Here a needfull question comes to be solved as What are we to judge of the Creeds confessions declaratios formes of faith synodal-conclusions both of the Antient and Moderne Kirk for since they containe the summe of credenda agenda petenda speranda that is of what we are to beleeve to do to aske and to hope for which are the Synopsis of all Christian duties the Question is If these are to be looked upon as fundamentalls or grounds of Answ Faith and trueth To answere this aright let us avoide these two extreams 1. None of these are so to be looked upon as Scripture or of equall authority to it It was an idol and idle word that of GREGORY to exequat the first foure generall Councells to the foure Evangelists 2. Avoid that other 1. of the vile Swenkfeldian who in disputing as they reject the Scriptures so also all Church determinations pretending though falsely that they are opposite to Christian liberty 3. That of the ARMINIAN Who though they admitt the reading of such Confessions and declarations yet they will not ascribe the least authority to them The pure Antient Kirk and our Orthodox present kirks oppose both these and have published very needfull and worthy vses of these formes as 1. They are looked upon as the Expositions of the true Catholick Faith 2. As strong barres both to hold out and to remove heresies 3. As a ready Catechisme containing the grounds of both what we are to beleeve what to do 4. They are a singular Meane to beget preserve a good understanding between kirks and to foment Peace unitie and concord amongst them as by the harmonious Confessions of the Reformed Churches is now seen as when that which indeed is an Orthodox ground is received and the Heterodox tenet is rejected That axiom of Lyrin was much esteemed Quod semper quod ubique quod ab omnibus creditum est which ever and everie-where and by all is beleeved In Ignaetius his Epistles it is often remarked and inculcated That whosoever will not joine to the abridged doctrines of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee is corrupted III. Vindication But passing this I next offer to vindicate this place from the false inferences of the Rhemists Bellarmine Becan Tirinus Valent Gretzer If the Church bee the ground of trueth then all Christians may should at last acquiesce to its determinations 1 Ob. answered so safely resolve their faith into it at last To which I answere first by denying the Consequent because the Churches Authority is not the formall cause of our assent to divine trueths as shal be shewen in the Answere to the third Objection 2. Giving but not granting what is in the illation yet I deny that to appertain to the present Roman Church which is the maine aime of these Sophisters 3. I propose to them this question which they force us to startle which is What is that Christian Society into which all credible Objects are vltimately resolved into Is it the Antient Catholick Kirk or is it the lawfull oecumenick Councells or is it the concurrent judgement of the Antient Fathers or is it the present RomaÌ„ Kirk To these the late Jesuits answer far otherwise theÌ„ the Moderate Schoolmen did I shall succinctly repeat some of their most absurd answers to this I meane of the Iesuits Bellarm. lib. 4. de P. R. chap. 1. affirmes every successour of Peter to be the rock and foundation of trueth Gretzer lib. 3. cap. 10. defens by the Church wee interpret the Pope D. Bann 2. secundae The authority of the universall Kirk that of the Pope are the same The Cannon Law lib. 6. Extravag tit 14. The Rescripts of the Pope are Canonicall scripture D. John Whyte in his way c. Digress 16. p. 36. collects out of their Writers this to be their judgment 1. say they The Catholick Church is the Rule to be followed in all points as the rule infallible 2. The Roman and the Catholick Faith are all one 3. By the Kirk we mean her Head saieth Valentia tom 3. d. 1. p. 24. so that this Catholick Church wherof they so much brag is no other but the Pope Now this Valentia finding the bed to be shorter then that he can stretch himself upon it as wee have Isai 28. 20. down right maintains that neither Antient Councells nor the antient Kirk nor old Decretalls nor the present Roman Kirk but the Pope is that whereunto at last we must resolve our faith of which rule to resolve unto he saieth Analys fidei lib. 8. cap. 7. Stante hac regula rationali animata infallibili omnes fidei articuli ultimatè resolvuntur in ipsam tanquaÌ„ in rationem formalem So that according to this new doctrine of the Roman Kirk Alexander VII now Pope is that ground of trueth whereon all are to lean so that the Pope now as D. Clerk wittily observes is growen so bigg that hee is both Head and whole Body yea the whole Church both holy Father and holy Mother both Husband and Wife nay the Pope is God as one Felinus Sandeus blasphemes This compendious way that they are fallen upon puts me in minde of a like foolish conceit one S. Cornaeus a late Iesuit hath fallen on who to reject Bellarmins 15 notes of the kirk falls only upon one as sufficient to confirme truths confute errours which is the Miracles of the RomaÌ„ Church Now to shew the folly of Valentia such flatterers heare what to the contrar says J. Picê° in concl It may happen that the Pope the vicariaÌ„ head be sick and as the naturall head sends down noxious humours into the body so also this Vicarian corrupt doctrines into its body But Puteanus a late Iesuite is now more plain and bold in his CoÌ„m on 2. 2. q. 1. a. 6. That the present Pope to wit Paul V. is Christ his true vicar successour is not not absolutely belonging to faith for this Proposition presupposeth two other Propositions 1. That Paul the V. is baptised 2. That Paul V. was Canonically elected to be pope but so it it that none of these two Propositions belongs to the Catholick faith thus he out of which I forme this syllogisme Whatsoever Alexand. 7. hath defined that is infallible the ground of trueth but he hath defined this or that Here grant that the Proposition wer true which yet is most false yet its AssumptioÌ„ can be no more then probable For how can he be certain that this Pope was lawfully ordained or at all baptised Of these there is no more then humane assent grounded upon probable conjectures or what certainty is there to all and every one subject to him that he hath published this or that definition Of these and the like is no divine certantie It is excellently well proven by S. V. LYND That in the Roman Church which they so farre extoll above Scripture
there is neither safety nor certanty whether we understand the Essentiall or the Representative or the Virtuall or the Consistoriall Church nor that Individuall Church barbarously so called which wants both personall and true doctrinall succession see his Via devia p. 513. and 452. And whereas Fisher and some others account it more safe to resolve into the Councell of Trent now I say this can be of no credit at all because this Councell was neither lawfully called nor was it free nor was it generally received by the Romanists themselves see Innoc. Gentill on it and Sess 12. see Chemnitii examen see Calvini Antidotum see the History of the Councell of Trent lib. 4. p. 319. see Whyts 3 Conf with Fisher Since the Nicen Creed hath I beleeve in the Church Therefore Ob. 2. primarly properly it is the pillar and ground of trueth wherupon Stapleton hath this assertion against WHITAKER I beleeve whatsoever the Church beleeveth lib. 1. cap. 9. and this indeed is the true ground of their circular argueing or the COLLIARRS faith and of that brutish assertion of Cajetan That the obedience of a Brute is the most perfect obedience of any But to speake to what is alleadged of the Nicen symbol I answere 1. That preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not at all in that Creed it is a false quotation of the Rhemists like many more 2. In the Symbol of Constantinople we reade it indeed and our Divines clearly shew that it was spuriously foysted in there 3. Make it to bee the reall composure of that second generall Councell yet Drusius that great Critick makes it to maintain no more then I beleeve the Church But 4. August Tom. 10. p. 311. de expos Symboli is of a farre better sounder judgement when he said there because the Church is not God therefore wee beleeve not into it or in it Faith its credere as to the Trinitie sayes hee is considere but Faiths credere as to the rest or secundarie objects of faith it is but agnoscere August knew nothing of that late Iesuit-opinion I may beleeve in the Kirk as I beleeve in the Virgin Mary neither of these is true Though all the superstructures of this Church were most true yet all its decisions are to be tryed and examined That even in Augustins judgement to whom Protestants appeale Ob. 3. so often The Church is the ground of trueth when contra epistolam fundamenti he sayes I would not have beleeved the Gospell unlesse the authority of the Church had moved mee Now to cleare August and to satisfie as farre as may bee the Papist I answer 1. If it be well considered against whom and for what August disputes there which both our Divines have shewen and Papists knew well enough this testimony can make nothing either against us or for them 2. Some schoolmen as Scotus Gabriel Canus judge that Augustine is to be understood of acquisite historicall faith and not of infused 3. Others of them thinke that Augustin there is speaking of the Authority of that Church which the Apostles governed not of the succeeding Church But passing them I answer by this distinction of the meane of Distinguish between by which and for which the principall cause It is well marked by Baron Apod Cathol p. 628. h. 9. q. 4. That wee ought to use these two Prepositions warily Per and Propter that is by which and for which I beleeve The first imports the vse of means without which faith is not ordinarly produced but this other relats to the principall ground and formall cause of our assent And so I apply the Churches testification is a meane to beleeve the Gospell but the principall ground of my assent to its trueths is because God hath revealed Distinguish between the Morall proofe the Divine proofe it I make it yet more cleare by distinguishing between a Morall proofe and a Divine proofe the Testimony of the Church is a morall proofe motive or inductive of Faith but the Authority of the Holy Ghost speaking in the scriptures is that Divine proofe causing assent whereunto at last I resolve Altisiedorensis thus explains it It is with the beleever ordinarly as it was with the Samaritans Ioh. 4. 42. that is after her discovery to them by the light of grace they perceive the Divine Majesty Wisdome efficacie and trueth of Christs doctrine and resolve into them and as when a faithfull Preacher delivers Apostolick doctrine though by his preaching wee receive these trueths yet we resolve not our faith principally and finally into his Authority who preaches to us but into that divine truth that is preached by him Heare the same learned Baron yet clearing this As the principall effective cause of our assent is the Holy Ghost by inward illumination of the minde and effectuall moving of the will so the word of God it selfe revealed by its innate light vertue and Majesty manifesting its Divinity is the principall objective cause or ground of our assent to the trueths of the Gospell And after him D. Owen anent the divine Originall of Script p. 33. The sole bottome and foundation or formall reason of our assent to the Scriptures as Gods Word and submitting our hearts and consciences to these Scriptures is the Authority of God the supream Lord of all the first and only absolute trueth speaking in and by the the pen-men of the Scriptures evidenced singly in and by the Scriptures c. As for the innate Arguments in the scriptures that is The Power and Majesty of the Word the simplicity of the style the ingyring light the consonancie in it and in the Writters of it the divine trueths contained in it c. These and many the like shew what a ground it is to faith in so much that the Antient Kirk Traditor libri was judged Abnegator fidei But the Papists by attributing so much to Church-Authority and detracting so much from the Divine-Authority of the Scriptures and not resting in them have fallen into a miserable and an unextricable Circle STAPLETON maintaining in his Triplicatio fol. 188. That the last ground of Faith is the Authority of the Kirk Then the question is By what authority beleeve ye that the Kirk hath Divine-Authority His answere is The Scriptures say so Question againe By what beleeve ye this Answers hee The Church sayes so Marke the words of one H. Holden an Englishman and Parisian Doctor lib. 1. cap. 9. Div. anel fidei as they are cited by R. Baxter in his safe Religion p. 284. confessing the trueth of the cōmon labyrinth circular shift in which Divines cōmonly wont to be involved For when they asked how they know then Scripture to be the revealed Word of God They answere by the assertion of the Vnversall censenting Church And if they be againe asked how they know that this unanimous assertion of the Catholick Kirk is free from errour or infallible They answere by
the Word of GOD thus they unavoydably slide into the Circle most filthily dauncing in a ring The faith c. But as for our beleefe to close this point it is thus resolved Wee beleeve the Christian doctrine to be true because the true God is the Authour of it We discerne that God is the Authour of it both by his intrinsicke and extrinsicke seals or attestations of it in that it bearech his Image and Superscription and is confirmed by his undoubted uncontroled Miracles and other effects which leade us to the Cause O but say the Rhemists and Bellarm. and others The Presence Ob. 4. the Promise the Prayers of Christ to and for the Church the assistance of the Holy Spirit to and with the Spouse and Body of Christ and former experiences towards his inheritance may make us conclude that in a proper and strict sense the Church is the ground of trueth so infallible that it cannot erre in the decisions of trueth else to what end are all these its Priviledges Ans Answer Let us yeeld all these priviledges to and of the Church but what is that to the present Roman Church which is their aime what a slight including argument were this O Timothy know how thou oughtest to behave thy selfe in Gods house the kirk of Ephesus because the Kirk of ROME is the ground of trueth because to it ar the promises because to it is given infallibilitie Is not this a meer begging of the question The point here is never proven One particular Church hath no more particular priviledges then another Ephesus is now an Apostate so hath Rome also apostatised To cleare my Answere yet further I propose these two queries 1. How can the present Roman Kirk be a ground of trueth since Quer 1 it disagreeth so much with it self anent both the nature number of fundamentalls neither dare its Doctours define either of these My second querie is Where is the seat of infallibilitie Quer 2 Who it is that is the infallible Judge The papists of France hold that a Generall Councell is above the Pope that it is it that is infallible so do these WRITERS Cusanus Cameracensis Garson Almain Florent Panormitan c. The Italians maintaine the flate contrare and most of the Jesuits O but sayes BELLARM Christs prayer for Peter was for faiths infallibilitie both to him and all his successours in that Chayre but that is flately denied no more is in Luk. 19. but a prayer and promise to Peter against heart-unbeleefe but not a word anent the words of his mouth nothing anent his pretended successours But here yet they object this against vs Can that be a true Church or a safe Religion or way to walk in which is fallible but the Protestant Church is such according to our confessed tenet I Ans 1. by these distinctions 1. I distinguish between a man that may be deceived and a man that is deceived 2. between infallibilitie in the Object in the Subject 3. between infallibilitie in the absolutely necessar points and in some inferiour smaller matters as is well marked by Baxter p. 43. 44. Therefore wee say 1. Suppose wee should deviat yet wee have an infallible Rule the Word though there be much weaknes in the Recipient yet there is still infallibilitie in the Object the Scriptures 2. I affirme all Churches to be infallible that they cannot erre in fundamentalls in sensis composito that is while they remaine true Churches and deny no essentiall of Faith but the same in sensis diviso are fallible that is when they leave the Objects infallibilitie that is the holy Scriptures as the Rule of trueth 3. Wee make a difference between that Cui subesse potest falsum and that Cui actu subest falsum A man may be deceived who yet is not deceived None is falsus or actually deceived when he beleeves the doctrine of the Protestant Religion that is the holy Scriptures A man may be actually not mistaken when he is not absolutely infallible But lastly here they object a passage of August who in his Epist 162. sayes that in Romana Ecclesia semper viguit Apostolicae Cathedrae principatus To which I answere 1. Distinguish between what Rome now is when it was sound Then was no Supremacy then no visible Monarchie then no power of both the swords then the Principalitie was in the profession of a sound faith in the practise of piety in in prayers in charity in tears c. So that this makes nothing for the establishment of the tyranny of the present Roman Church Now of what I have said I give these generall Observes and 1 Observe vses And the first shall be this 1. Wherever this divine trueth really is and is sincerly professed there is a true Kirk Boyd in his Comment on Ephes pag. 335. hath a note apposite to this Trueth is the forme informing of the Church and the Church is the matter informed even as the Candlestick holds out the Candle so its light so doth the true Church hold out the light of trueth And no lesse hath Hensius a pertinent note on the place to this Where God is there is trueth where trueth is there is the ground of trueth Our God is a God of trueth psal 31. 5. and Christ is trueth Ioh. 17. 14. 6. and trueth comes by him Ioh. 1. 17. and the gospell is the gospell of trueth Gal. 3. 1. and all Worshippers should worship Him in spirit and in trueth Ioh. 4. 23. and where men are begotten by the Word of trueth I am 1. 18. there I say we may warrantably conclude is a true Kirk Then let this be the first use wee make of this point IT is incumbent to all the true Members of this true Kirk to be for 2 Vse the Trueths holden out and professed in it II. Cor. 13. 8. For this end follow these precepts and practises of holy men here mentioned As 1. Choose the trueth with DAVID psal 119. 30. 2. Love the trueth with ZECHARY chap. 8. 19. 3. Buy the trueth with SOLOMON prov 23. 23. 4. Pray for its propagation with CHRIST himself Ioh. 17. and 17. psal 43. 3. 5. Speak the truth with PAUL Eph. 4. 25. 6. Walk in the trueth as GAIUS Ioh. 3. 3. and psal 86. 11. 7. Pray with David to be lead in the trueth psal 25. 5. 8. Execute the judgement of trueth ZECHAR 8. 16. 9. Beare witnesse unto the trueth as John Baptist did Ioh. 5. 33. 10. Have your loines girt about with the girdle of trueth Eph. 6. 14. 11. And be yee established in the present trueth II. Pet. 1. 12. 12. Teach the way of God in trueth Matth. 22. 16. II. Cor. 4. 2. Therefore my third vse is Let Ministers learne to divide the word of trueth aright in this do as Paul bids II. Tim. 2. 15. and in this do as Paul did see 3 Vse II. Cor. 4. 2. and II. Cor. 6. 4.