of their aduersaries to impugne their Aduersaries withall there is no doubte but that it hath in it selfe exceding muche light and force of truth as a thing hauing so litle need of proofe that it may be made and taken for a probation of other matters that be doubtefull and vncertaine Practise of priesthod in remitting sin vsed for a grouÌ„d of faith in argumeÌ„t The matter which we haue now in hand is of that sort For the authoritie and power practised of Priests in the vertue of the holy Ghoste hath euer ben in it self both so plaine and so firme that the holy Fathers haue vsed it as a ground to proue against heretikes of Eunomius and Macedonius secte the Godhead of the holy Ghost the third person in Trinitie S. Bernard is to yong good man to name amongest these old fathers of our new Church els perdie with the vertuous his words souÌ„d ful sweetly Thus saith he to proue the equalitie of the holy Ghoste with the Father and Sonne Sicut in nobis interpellat pro nobis Serm. 1. Pentec it a in patre delicta donat cum ipso patre vt omnino scias quòd remissionem peccatoruÌ„ spiritus sanctus operatur Audi quod aliquando audierunt Apostoli Accipite spiritum sanctum quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur eis In English thus Like as in vs he maketh sure for vs so in the Father he pardoneth sinnes with the Father and that thou maist vnderstande that the holy Ghost worketh remissioÌ„ of sinnes heare that which the Apostles once heard receiue you the holy Ghost whose sinnes you doe forgeue thei are forgeuen Thus he And S. Ambrose his auncient to proue the holy Ghost to be God allegeth that he remitteth sinnes by the Priests ministerie which he could not in anie wise doe if he were not in al points equal and omnipoteÌ„t God with the Father and Sonne Let vs see saith he whether the holy Ghost doth pardon sinnes and he answereth himself thus Sed hinc dubitari non potest Lib. 3. de Spirit S. Cap. 19. cum ipse Dominus dixerit accipite spiritum sanctum quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur ecce quia per spiritum sanctum peccata donantur homines autem in remissionem peccatoris ministerium suum exhibent non ius alicuius potestatis exercent It is thus much to say There can be no doubt hereof seing our Lord said receiue you the holy Ghost whose sinnes you doe forgeue they shal be forgeuen loke ye that by the holy Ghost sinnes be forgeuen men doe but exercise their seruice and ministerie and claime not the right of power and principalitie therein And S. Basill vppon this assured ground frameth in ful fourme against Eunomius this argument Lib. 5. Dominus sanctis Apostolis insufflans inquit accipite spiritum sanctum quorumcunque dimittetis peccata dimittentur eis si ergo nullius est peccata dimittere nisi solius Dei dimittit autem spiritus sanctus per Apostolos Deus ergo spiritus sanctus Our Lord breathing on the Apostles said take ye the holy Ghost for whose sinnes so euer you shal pardon they be pardoned therefore if it be the oÌ„ly property of God to forgeue sinnes and the holy Ghost so doth by the Apostles Ergo the holy Ghost is truelie God Thus you perceiue that the ground of this our faith and assertion was of olde accompted so sure that it was a singular aide and fortresse of faithe against the vnfaythfull attemptes of moste wicked persons in diuerse ages The onelie practise that Priestes did vse by the Sacramente of penance to pardonne sinnes was a full proofe that the holy Ghost was God by whose authoritie and propre power they did alwaies since Christes word was spoken remitte the same The which being true as it can not be false that is so agreeable both to scriptures and to all our Fathers faith the Heresie of our time must needs directly impugne the vertue and power of Gods own spirit For as the proofe of mans ministery in this foresaid function induceth the true and euerlasting Godhead of the holie Ghost by whom they practise that power so the denial thereof and robery of Priesthoode of this their moste iust claime doth directly spoile God of his honour and of the euerlasting right that he hath in remission of sinnes oÌ„temp of mans ministeri is conteÌ„pt of Gods authoritie So whiles these good men seeke to abase man vniustlie they blaspheame God highly and together with mans ministerie they bring vnto vtter contempte Gods owne authoritie But for the Readers case and more light of our cause I ioyne thus in argument with them againe vppon the second parte of Christes own woordes and action had in the authorising of his Apostles what soeuer the holie Ghost maye doe in this case by the proper power of his Godhead that maye the Apostles and priestes doo by seruice ministerie throughe the power of the holie Ghost but the holie Ghost properly rightly doth remitt sinnes therfore the Apostles doe rightly and truely remitt sinnes by their ministerie in the said holie Ghost All partes of this conclusion stande vppright and feare no falshod they be guarded on euery side by Christes action by woordes of scripture by the doctours plaine warrant and by al reason with all which whosoeuer is not contented but wil needes extinguere spiritum extinguish Goddes spirite 1. Thes 5. and violently take from the Church the greatest comfort of all mans life that in this infirmitie of our flesh standeth in moste hope by his gifte in remission of sinnes for which especiall cause the said spirite was mercifullie breathed vpon the Apostles peculiarly before the more common sending of the same from heauen aboue if al this reason and iust demonstration of trueth wil not serue them I wil chardge them with this graue coÌ„clusioÌ„ of S. Augustine vttered partly agaynst the Nouatians especially against the desperate that would not seeke for Gods mercie by the Churches ministerie in the sacrameÌ„t of penaunce To be brief I wil speake it in English Cap. â—3 Enchir. who so euer he be that beleueth not mans sinnes to be remitted in Goddes Church and therfore despiseth the bouÌ„tifullnes of God in so mightie a work if he in that obstinat mind coÌ„tinue til his liues end he is giltie of sinne against the holie Ghoste in which holy Ghost Châ—ist remitteth sinnes The power to remitte sinnes is further proued to be giuen to the Apostles by these woordes of Christ Whose sinnes you doo forgiue cet by the doctours exposition of the same and by conference of other woordes of scripture of the like sense The Fourh Chap. HOwe the priestes of Christes Churche haue defended their right and calling for remission of sinnes as wel by the commission that Christe firste receyued of his Father afterward bestowed vpon them as by the assured receiuing of the spirite of God from Christes blessed breath
God the Father to his only Sonne from him again to such as he hath sent and made the messengers of his blessed mind and disposers of mysteries he hath no feelinge at all of the wayes that he wrought for mans redemption he can not atteyne to the intelligence of Christes vnction wherby he is made our head and prieste he in the middest of the glorious light of the Churche can not heholde the practise of so heauenlie ministeries In Epist sua Canoâ—â—ca therefore such thinges as he knoweth not he blasphemeth sayth S. Iude. But to wooâ—k all in light order I wil build vpon the forsaid the intended conclusion that the Aduersaries maie see and beholde the force of our faith and the singular weaknes of their assertions I thus ioyne with them in argumentes barely and playnly without couert That power and Commission which was giuen to Christe by his heauenlie Father concerninge remission or reteining of sinnes was geuen to the Apostles at his departure hence but Christe him selfe did truelie effectuallie and in proper fourme of speach by his Fathers sending and commission remitte sinnes Ergo the ministers of Christ may and doo truly perfectly remitte sinnes Or thus more brieflie As Christ was sent of his Father so are the Apostles sent by Christ but Christ was sent to forgeue sinnes Ergo the Apostles be sent to forgeue sinnes also The second part of the reasons which is that Christ had power of his Father to remit sinnes was sent for the same purpose is sufficientlie proued in the chapter before The first part of the argumeÌ„t standeth vpoÌ„ the sure grouÌ„d of Christes owne woordes which be these Like as my Father sent me so I doo send you Which woordes were so plaine and so deeply noted for this intent of S. Chrysostome that with admiration of the dignitie and excellent calling of priesthod he thus trimly difcourseth vpon them I will report his saying in Latin De sacerdot lib. 3. as Germanus Brixius hath translated it all that he speaketh for that purpose hereafter shall be reciâ—ed but nowe no more but this Quid hoc aliud esse dicas nisi omnium rerum coelestiuÌ„ potestatem illis à Deo esse concessam Ait enim quoruÌ„cunque peccata retinueritis retentae sunt Quaenam obsecro potestas hac vna maior esse queat Pater omnifariam filio potestatem dedit caterum video ipsam candem omnifariam potestateÌ„ à Deo filio illis traditam Nam quasi iam in coeluÌ„ translati ac supra humanam naturam positi atque nostris ab affectibus exeÌ„pti sic illi ad principatum istum perducti sunt And in English thus it is What els canst thou make of this or what lesse then that the power iurisdiction of al heauenly things is by God graunted vnto them For it is said Whose sinnes so euer you do hold or reteine they be reteined For Gods loue what power can be geueÌ„ in the world so great the Father bestowed al maner of power vpon his Son I find the very self same power of al things to be deliuered to the Apostles by God the Son For now as though they were already translated out of this life to heauen and there promoted aboue mans nature and discharged of al our feeble affections they are aduanced to the princely soueraigntie wherof we now haue said Thus farre Chrysostome So doth this woorthie Father helpe our cause and so doth he thinke of the excellent authoritie geuen by the Father to his Sonne and deriued froÌ„ him to the ministers of his holie will testament in earth Whose iurisdiction so highly holden so truely obteined so nerelie ioyned vnto Christes honour and so daily practised no otherwise but in his right and name whosoeuer shal comtrolle or contemne they not onely irreuerentlie touche Gods annointed but they sacrilegiouslie laie handes on ipsum Christum Domini euen on him that is annointed aboue all his fellowes Lib. 1. de PoeniteÌ„t Cap. 7. Wel I conclude vp this matter with these few woordes of S. Ambrose Vult Dominus plurimum posse discipulos suos vult à seruis suis ea fieri in nomine suo quae faciebat ipse positus in terris Our Lordes pleasure is that his disciples should haue great prerogatiue he will haue the same things wrought by his seruantes in his name that him selfe did in his own person when he was in earth The power of priesthod touching remission of sinnes is proued by the solemne action of Christ in breathing vpon his Apostles and geuing them therby the holie Ghost The third Chap. THE commission power that our maister Christ receiued of his euerlastinge Father beinge in most ample maner communicated with the Apostles made great proofe and euidence for the right that they claime in remission of sinnes but the present power of Gods Spirite breathed by Christ vpon them and geuen vnto them for the ministerie and execution of that function helpeth our matter so much that who so euer nowe denieth this authoritie of the Apostles concerning the pardoning of our offenses doth not so much sinne against the Sonne of man which of it selfe is greuous inoughe as he doth controll the worke of the spirite of Christ which is the holie Ghost in whome both he and his Church doth remitte sinnes The more plaine and more exact our master Christe was in the bestowing of that power to remitte and reteine sinnes the more is our contempt in the disobedience deniall thereof He sendeth them forth with his owne authoritie in this case he geueth them the very spirit of God by whose diuine power they maie execute the function to which he called them he geueth them the expresse warrant of his own woord that sinnes they might pardon and punish and yet we make doubt of their vsurpation But howe they mighte forgeue sinnes by Christes sending we haue alreadie said Nowe for the holie Ghostes power prerogatiue in the same action which was breathed on the Apostles we must further conferre with suche as call in question matters so plaine And firste I am in good hope that no man will denie but Christ gaue them the holie Ghost for no other purpose so much as to remitte sinnes secondly I doubt not of their faith and beliefe in this point but they wil confesse the holy Ghost to be of power by nature and propriety to forgeue sinnes Thirdlie I claime of their sinceritie thus muche more that Christ being as wel God as man was well able for the furniture of their calling to geue them the holy Ghost all which being confessed of al men and denied of no Christian aliue how the coÌ„clusion so besette with al proofe on euery side standeth not vpright let the Aduersaries tel me In the Apostles there can be no lacke touching that office for the execution whereof they receiued both Christes commission first and the holy Spirit of God afterward In Christ there
may pardon or reteine mans sinnes of all sortes as wel in the sacramente of penance al that be confessed as in publike iudgment what soeuer is by witnesse proued And as in this they maye at their pleasure where iustice requireth correcte the open offender by moste graue censures of Goddes Church so may the priestes giue due penaunce in the sacrament for the chastisment of suche sinnes as be to them confessed and for the satisfying of Goddes iustice by sinne violated The other text of holy scripture coÌ„teining Christes woordes to S. Peter seuerally A more peculiar prerogatiue geueÌ„ to S. Peter than to other Apostles by certayne notable circumstances of the letter and by woordes of great graunt spokâ—n singularly to him giueth the chief of all his Apostles in more ample termes and beneficial clauses this power and prerogatiue also To him it was onely said thou aâ—t Peteâ— which is as much to say as a rocke for oure Maister gaue him that name newe at his firste calling Ioan. 1. in significatioÌ„ of further intent and purpose which he here vttered and vpon this rocke will I sette my Church and hel gates shall not preuaile agaynste it That so sayd he thus spake in playne termes Et tibi dabo claues regni coelorum Et quodcunque ligaueris super terram erit ligatum in coelis quodcunque solueris super terram erit solutum et in coelis And to the wil I giue the keyes of the kingdome of heauen and what soeuer thou shalt binde in earth it shall be bounde in the heauens And what thow loosest in earthe it shal be loosed in the heauens Ibid. 21. This promise made vnto Peter and performed no doubt after his resurrection when he committed to him the feeding and gouernement of all his deare flocke both yong and olde doth excedingly importe a wonderfull incomparable soueraygntie and iurisdiction ouer mens soules For a mortall man to receiue the keyes of Christes kingdom by them to binde loose to locke out and lett in Keies of heauen vvhat they be before our maister Christe who had the full iurisdiction therin it was neuer heard of And when the holy Propheces doe meane to sette out the greate and passing power giueÌ„ by God the Father to his onely SoÌ„ne in earth they vse to expresse the same ofteÌ„ by the termes of keyes as when the prophet Esaie saith I wil lay the keyes of the house of Dauid vpon his shoulder he shall shutte and ther can none be hable to open and he shall open so that none can shutte agayne And Christ him selfe speaking to his beloued Iohn in the Apocalipse saith Cap. 22. I am the first and the last I am aliue and was dead before Apocal. 1. 3. and I haue the keyes of death and hell The keyes therfore euer signifyng power and gouernemeÌ„t of the houshold was giueÌ„ to Christ as to whom being the principall most excellent rectour of his own Church that he bought so dearly they most duely belong But he coÌ„municated vnto Peter as to his speciall steward that vse of the same for the gouernment of our soules with exceding much preheminence both in binding loosing Yet I do not remeÌ„ber that any of the olde writers doe put any greate differeÌ„ce betwixt the authorities of Peter the rest of the Apostles coÌ„cerning the remitting of sinnes which is a thing perteining indifferently to the whole order of priestod therfore no more proper to the Pope or Peter then to priestes Apostles thoughe Origen noted well that the iurisdictioÌ„ of Peter semed by those woords to be enlarged aboue the residue by that that our Sauiour sayde to him that what soeuer he bounde or loosed in earth it should be loosed or bound in the heauens wher to the rest he spake of heauen only in the singular number I speake only of this latter clause of binding loosing with the keyes therunto belonging For there is no doubt but great preheminence of rule iurisdictioÌ„ is promised before in the same text now recited elles where actually giuen vnto him more then to the rest of his brethern Neuerthelesse eueÌ„ this power of bindig loosing coÌ„mon to all the holy order was in him first seuerally planted for the coÌ„meÌ„datioÌ„ of vnitie order De simplicitatâ— prelatorum as S. Cyprian saith so the same authoritie geuen to other might yet after a sort be deriued from his fullnes of power and prerogatiue as from a founteyne But we wil not stand hereon nowe nor yet to put difference betwixt these woords and termes loosing or remitting binding or reteining nor to dispute whether these two textes more proprely signifie the authoritie and iurisdction geuen to the spirituall Magistrates for punishing by temporal pain enioyned and releasing by mercie as they see occasion the same appointed penance againe or els it proprely concerneth the very release of sinne it self or reteining the sinne which they vppon iust causes wil not forgeue These things would grow to ouer tediouse a tale and ouer curiouse for the simple whoÌ„ I would most helpe in these matters and I shal briefly touch so muche hereof as is necessarie hereafter when I shal dispute of pardons For in deede these two textes of binding and losing as wel spoken to Peter as to the residue afterwarde shall be the ground of our whole discourse there and therefore til then we must touch these textes no farther but as in common perteineth to remitting or reteining sinnes For they are brought indifferentlie of the holy Fathers with that foresaid words of S. Iohn in which as I haue declared the very institution of penance and Priestes iudgement of our soules and sinnes be most proprely grounded Therefore that by al these woordes so often vttered by our Sauiour you may wel perceiue the very litteral and vndoubted meaning to be that Priests haue authoritie by Christes warraunt effectually to remit and reteine sinnes I wil recite one or two notable places of most auÌ„cient Fathers that they ioyning with such plaine woordes of sundrie places of scripture may make all most sure to such as can by any reasoÌ„ be satisfied First I alledge the saing of S. Maximê° an old author a blessed saint Homil. In natali Petri Pauli He doth by conference couple together these textes wheroÌ„ we now stand thus he speaketh very pithely therefore you shal heare his own woords Ne qua vos fratres de creditis Petro clauibê° regni more no straruÌ„ clauiuÌ„ cogitatio terrena ê‘moueat clauis caeli lingua est Petri quam singulorum merita censendo Apostolus vnicuique regnum caelorum aut claudit aut aperit Non est ergo clauis ista mortalis artificis aptata manu sed data à Christo potestas est iudicandi Denique ait eis qnorum remiseritis peccata remissa erunt quorum detinueritis detenta erunt Thus he saith in our tung Least
Christian to coÌ„fesse his sinnes either to his own ordinary Parochian or to some other Priest that hath by him or otherwise authority and iurisdiction ouer the Penitent that Protestants affirme albeit very falslie that Confession was first instituted in the said Councel and this was more then three hundreth yeares since And foure hundred yeares before that in a Prouincial Councel kept at Vormacia Can. 7. there is a Canon made coÌ„cerning the qualities of the Priests that are constituted to be CoÌ„fessours Penitentiaries where it is commaunded that they be such Qui possunt singulorum causas originem quoque modum culparum sigillatim considerare examinare that can particularly trie out and examine the causes of euery offeÌ„der the manner and grouÌ„d of their faultes Which decree is borowed woord for woorde almost Can. 102. out of the last Canon of Constantinople Councel called the sixth general whiche was long before all the foresaid Synodes Their discourse is long vpon the Priests dutie which should siâ—te on confessions whoÌ„ they instruct by these woordes Oportet qui facultateÌ„ absoluendi et ligandi à Deo receperunt peccati qualitatem speculentur et peccatoris promptitudinem ad reuersionem vt sic medicamentum admoueant aegritudini aptum ne si de peccato sine discrimine staâ—uant aberrent à salute aegrotantis Those that haue receiued of our Lord power to loose and binde must trie out the qualitie of euery fault and the readinesse of the offender to returne to vertue that they may prouide a medicine meet for the malady least if they should without distincte knowledge of their sinne geue iudgemeÌ„t they should erre in prouiding health for the sick person By which Councell keâ—t in Constantinople you may easelie gather that neither Confession was euer omitted by lawe nor the common Penitenciarie long abrogated out of CoÌ„stantinople Churche And when I name these decrees of so many general Councels in diuerse ages I doe not only cal them generally to witnes for my cause which were enough seeing euery determination there passeth as by the sentence of the holy Ghoste and Christes owne iudgemente of whose presence such holy assemblance is assured but I appeale to euery holy Bisshop Vvhat it is to allege a general Councel Priest and Prince of the world that agreed to the same and were there assembled euery of which was of more experience learning and vertue or at the least of more humility then all our Aduersaries aliue But now if you go to trye other the learned writers of all times for the practise of this point then our labour shal be infinit but our cause more strong our Aduersaries soner confounded I need not for that practise name the learned Schoolmen of excellent capacitie in deepe mysteries because they were so late and because Heretikes can not denie but they are al vndoubtedly against them and euerye one for vs Thomas Aquinas is oures Dionysius is oures I meane the Carthusian If any man doubt of S. Bernard lette him reade the life of Malachie whom he praiseth for bringing into vre the most profitable vse of Confession In vitam Malach. in the rude partes of Ireland S. Bede is proued before Super 5. ca. Iacob not only to haue allowed confession to the Priest but to haue expounded S. Iames woordes of Confession for the sacramente of Penance and vttering our sinnes to Gods Ministers And he recordeth that in oure Countrie of England before his daies S. Bede sheweth examples of CoÌ„fession to a Prieste vsed in England Cap. 25. Confession was vsed to a Priest Whereof as also of Penance and satisfaction there is an exaÌ„ple or two in the fourth booke of his Ecclesiasticall Historie of oure Churche Before him S. Gregorie so well liketh and knoweth this practise of sacramental Confession In Prasprali Gregorij that in his Pastorall he prescribeth the Priestes of Gods Church many wayes howe to seeke out the diseases of their peoples soules and according to the variety of the same to admitte or put backe to pardon or to punnish De â—oen dist 6. Cap. de Sacer. S. yea so plaine he is in this matter that he chargeth the Priest to be exceding grieuously punnished that in any case shall vtter the Penitentes confession or anye parte thereof Againe farre aboue these holy Leo and Great amending the hard custom that in some places of Italie and Campania Epist 80. was vsed touching publik confession of priuate sinnes he saieth Reatus conscientiarum sufficiat solis sacerdotibus indicari confessione secreta Quamuis enim plenitudo fidei videtur esse laudabilis Vide euÌ„dem ad Theodor. Iuli. â—orens qua propter Dei timorem apud homines erubescere non veretur tamen quia non omnium huiusmodi sunt peccata vt velint in poenitentiam ea publicari remoueatur tam improbabilis consuetudo ne multi à poenitentiae remedijs arceantur dum aut erubescunt aut metuunt mimicis suis facta sua reserare quibus possint legum constitutione percelli Sufficit enim illa confessio quae primùm Deo offertur tunc etiam sacerdoti qui pro debitis confitentium precator accedit Tunc enim demum plures ad poenitentiam potuerunt prouocari si populi auribus non publicetur conscientia confitentis Yt is enough Mark the reasons of this holy Father for auricular confession that the gilt and offences of mans conscience be opened to the Priestes alone in secreat Confession For though the feruoure of faith be verie laudable which is contente for Gods sake to be ashamed before man yet because the sinnes of euerye man be not such that the penitent woulde gladlie vtter openly let so reprobable custome be abolished least many be holdeÌ„ from the remedies of penance whiles either they are ashamed or feare to opeÌ„ their deedes to their ennemies by whome they might by order of lawe be punnished For that confession is sufficient which is made first to God and then to the Priest also who wil be an intercessour for the sinnes of them that confesse For then might moe be prouoked to penance if the secreat conscience of the confessed be not published to the eares of the people Thus saieth S. Leo a man of that time and credite as our Aduersaries would wish Let them say now that priuate confession began in Lateran Councel ConfessioÌ„ vsed before Laterane Councel as vvel as the receiuing of the B. Sacrament because that thing which euer was counted and vsed as necessarie was there decreed for the ameÌ„ding of the peoples slouth to be done euery yeare once at the least before they receiued the blessed Sacrament As truely may they say that the Euchariste and receiuing thereof was begon in the same Councel and by the very same Canon For as ther is charge that euery maÌ„ should be confessed so there is commaundement geueÌ„ that euery man shal receiue once a yeare the
earnest vnfained teares proceding of loue deuotioÌ„ haue purchased many one a pardoÌ„ Peter wept bitterly loued hartely therfore he was restored to grace and mercy after Christ had punished as in way of penaÌ„ce his thre denialls with a triple demaunde of his loue as though he had doubted of his harte towardes him as S. Hilarie S Cyrill other doe interpreet it Super Ioan vlt. he not only gaue him a pardon of al that was past but made him his substitute in earth and chiefe pastour of al his flock If it staÌ„d thus therefor with the party penitent then the Popes Pardon shall vndoubtedly be beneficiall vnto him otherwise either not at al or els nothiÌ„g so muche as they seeme to sounde For althoughe it be an olde saying quòd indulgentiae tantum valent quantum sonaÌ„t that Indulgences be of as greate force and valour as the forme of their woordes doe importe yet that is not otherwise to be vnderstand then there wher ther may seeme iuste cause of graunte to the geuers and not euill disposition in the receiuers Adrianus For as Adrianus that once was Pope him selfe reasoneth If the Magistrates of the Church may not without iuste cause giue dispensation concerning vowes othes fastes mariages or suche like nor dispose the teÌ„poral treasures of the Churche without reasonable cause then may not surely the Bishopes be lauyshe of the treasure of Gods House which is muche more pretious wherof there can be no man partaker that is an vnprofable meÌ„ber of the body Neuer the lesse the causes of geuing indulgences may be more or lesse reasonable according to the state and varietie of thinges which to the wisdom of Gods Vicar in earth is best seeÌ„ whom Christ so ruleth in that case that he maye be most beneficiall to his holie houshold in so muche that it is not to be doubted but in these dayes and in this greate contempt of deuout and religious exercises the mouing onely of the people to prayer to holy peregrinations to the obedieÌ„ce of the Church may be a sufficieÌ„t cause why ther should be to prayers sayd vpoÌ„ books or beads sanctified creatures for suche pourpose annexed great remissioÌ„ The thinges that heretikes doo hat must most be reuerenced For look what thinges be most condemned of Heretikes those thinges must Christian men be induced to reuerence with moste singular zele religioÌ„ Neither caÌ„ therebe any thing in the world so necessary for vs christiaÌ„ meÌ„ of these times that be so voide of good workes as by deuotion entier zele to ioyn with our elders that in the holy coÌ„munioÌ„ of SaÌ„ctes we may be partakers of their vertuous deedes The ende of the Popes pardoÌ„s And that is the very ende of al the Popes PardoÌ„s to make vs in oure lacke of satisfaction for oure sinnes felowes and coparteners of the abundaÌ„ce that was in Christ first and then by him in oure holy brethren departed before vs. VpoÌ„ all which it is very plaine that euery man can not beneficially receiue the fructe of a Pardon this at least being requisite in euerie man that listeth to attein benefite therby that he be in state of grace and in earnest intent to continue in the knotte of Christ his Church Thus he must nedes be qualified that vvil take benefite by a pardoÌ„ with loue and liking of the holy workes of his christian brethren and accomplishing at least that small work which commonly now is ioyned to the Pardon for encrease of christian deuotion The continuance of which deuotion that more and more decayeth maketh the Pardons to be more coÌ„mon at this day and of late years then they were in the primitiue Church when moste men in the springe of christian religion and feruoure of faith sought to satisfie exactly the debt of the penance or ells which was a common case theÌ„ recompensed it by Martyrdom though S. Gregori the first of that name more then nine hundred yere since Vide cronica PaÌ„dalio Lutherani in the ordering of the stations at Rome is knoweÌ„ to haue geuen pardons for yeares or dayes in like fourme as now is vsed And cleare it is that the thing it selfe being founde lawfull and no Protestant aliue caÌ„ euer be hable to shew me the first vser thereof much lesse that it was euer controlled by any man that euer was compted Catholike it maye be measured according to the necessitie of the time and so as the Church may be moste edified And thankes be giuen to God the effecte of the loue of Indulgences and the contrarie issue of the contempt therof doe well proue the Churches good meaning therein For if you viewe both parties well you shall perceiue more profitable deuotion more christian charitie more furtherance of common wealthes causes in that side that feareth paynes for their sinnes with the Prophet Dauid euen after they be remitted and therefore seeke for all meanes moste humbly by mans ministerie to receiue mercie in one yeare you shall see in these deuout persons more fructes of repentaunce then in a whole old mans life can be found in all the other side that contempteously disdayn or scornfully deride the most profitable vsage both of penaunce and Pardons in Goddes Churche Therefore in so great proufe of the benefite that procedeth from this kinde of remissions for so Alexander the thyrde aboue foure hundreth yeares since termed Pardons vsed then to be giuen in Dedication of Churches and vpon moste assured groundes Vide tit de poeniten remis that it well agreeth both with Goddes woorde and practise of the primitiue Church and neuer condemned of any but of suche as be them selues worthely condemned of other greate heresies and errours the Magistrates will shewe mercy still in Christes behalfe and all the holy Bishopes succeding laufully the Apostles of Christ will giue peace and benediction to suche as humblie aske it at their handes Math. 10. and if the parties be worthie their peace by Christes promise shall rest vppon them if they either contemne it or be vnworthie of it then no harme doone it will returne to the giuers again Treuly that holy peace which Christ gaue to the Apostles at his coÌ„ming in to them at his departure from them â—oan 20. and ells as he entered vpon any holy action signified nothing ells but an agreement and peace of mans soule with God and did no doubt purge theÌ„ from their dayly infirmities which we call Venial sinnes and the bonde of all paine as it may be thought due for the same that in the presence of Gods maiesty sinne might cesse the parties appere cleane afore his face that had no spot of sinne in him selfe at all as by the sayed peace yet giueÌ„ to the worthy receiuers by holy Bishops ministerie Bishops blessyngs some lâ—ke effecte doth surelie ensue I vse this terme of peace wheÌ„ I speak of pardoÌ„s not because they are precisely meant