terms that it stood in the Covenant of works certainly we must either quite the Scriptures or acknowledge that nothing can be more destructive to the Christian Faith revealed there than such Doctrine Qu. Is there no infallible Rule and Judge to determine herein on whose decisive sentence we may securely rest in the greatest controversies Ans If we own ourselves Christians this can be no debate that the Scriptures contained in the Old and New-testament are the supreme Judge The Oracles of God committed to the Church Rom. 3 2. to give Answers in every dark case The Type and forme of sound Doctrine Rom. 6 17. Unto whose sentence we are in all matters both of Faith and Practice expresly referred by the Lord Isaiah 8 20. To the Law and to the Testimony if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them SECT II. Qu. SInce the Rule of Faith must be plain and intelligible can the Scripture be such which according to the Popish Doctrine is a Masse of dead and dark Characters untill their Church put a sense thereon Ans It s own witnesse is clear 1. That it Is such as maketh the simple wise Psal 19 7. And a Light shining in a dark place to which we are called to take heed 2 Pet 1 v. 19. A Lamp to our feet Psal 119 105. 2. We see what is written there was for our learning Rom. 15 4. and given us for that end that it might be understood 3. It is clear the promise of the Spirit to lead us into all Truth Joh. 16 13. doth belong to every Believer as well as to the greatest Doctors of the Church who can pretend no extraordinary Revelation for leading of them 4. We know the Fathers and Ancient Church did still prove their Doctrine from the Scripture as not only of more authority but more clear than their Comments 5. Though some Scriptures be not so plain as others and several Prophecies sealed up until their taking place in the event yet nothing can be more plain than the fundamentals of Christianity and those Scripture Truths necessary to Salvation But the World may see it is not obscurity against which their true quarrel is but a too clear evidence before which their interest cannot stand Qu. Yet is this a sufficient ground for the Scriptures being translated into our own Language so as every Man may read and have access thereto which the Romish Church so expresly forbids as the cause of Error and Heresie Ans We know 1. The command is express for all to read and teach their children Deut. 6 11. 2. That under the Law the Jewish Church had no restraint and should the Church now be in a worse case and live in more darknesse 3. Upon this account were the Bereans so highly commended for examining the Apostles Doctrine by the written Word which they could never have done if any such restraint to read the same had been upon them 4. It is a strange cure to keep from the Light for fear of going wrong and when Christ saith You erre not knowing the Scriptures Maâ—t 22 22. That ignorance thereof should be the way to keep us right Qu. Is it not evident 2 Pet. 3 v 16. How there are things hard to be understood in Paul's Epistles which the unlearned and unstable wrest to their own destruction Ans It is there shewed 1. Some things are more dark in the Scripture which none do deny 2. We see those who thus stumble are such as wrest the Word and not of a humble sober and serious Spirit by whom none will judge the Apostle here means the whole of Believers within the Church except the Doctors thereof Nor hath it more weight to forbid Christians use of the Scriptures and to read the same than the necessary use of meat because some unsober abuse the same to their hurt Qu. Whâ—t inducement should the Romish Church have to restrain Christians in this if it be so visibly cross to the Rule Ans They have I confess this plea for necessity since their case so stands they must either ruine their interest and be discovered in the greatest imposture that ever was known in the World or have the Bible shut up though to ruine the Souls of many Millions of the poor People nor is it strange such hate the light whose deeds are evil lest they be reproved SECT III. Qu. IS it not to the Church and to no private person That the supreme Authority and power of interpreting the Scripture and to be judge of the true sense thereof doth belong Ans The Scriptures is the alone infallible Rule for interpreting it self And to none but to the Holy Ghost speaking to us there can such Authority be ascribed 1. Because Scripture is the supreme standard by which we are called to prove all things 1 Thes 5 21. and to know the Spirits whether they be of God or not 1 Joh. 4 1. Yea thus must the Doctrine of the Church be known 2. The sense of the Scripture is the Scripture it self which thence only can be sought and understood by the same Spirit that indited it 3. We see by innumerable instances that where in one place it speaks more darkly it doth explain it self in another and thus refers us to its own interpretation yea how with a greater light and plainnesse Truths are opened up in the New Testament which more darkly and as under a Vail were held forth in the Old Qu. But the Scripture is of no private interpretation therefore to the Church only it must belong Ans This only shews the Scriptures Interpretation can be subjected to no humane Comments nor hath its Authority of men and from their private judgements whatever place they bear in the Church but must be sought from the Scripture it self and according to the Analogie of Faith but no ground in the least to deny accesse to private persons to know and seek after the true sense of the Scripture Qu. What assurance can any have that such is the true sense of the Scripture without some authoritative decision of the Church Ans We know 1. That the promise Joh. 7 17. stands good to every one of the Saints If any man do my will he shall know my Doctrine whether it be of God or not And such who object this dare not I am sure restrict the giving of the Spirit for that end to their Church-Doctors onlie 2. If the sense of any thing written can be understood then it is sure the most weighty and necessarie truths of the Scripture are so obviouslie plain as they can bear no other sense and meaning except men quit the very use of Reason and Judgement 3. Where the Scripturâ— is more dark there want not peculiar helps and means for a Christians attaining the true sense thereof such as serious prayer the knowledg of the original languages and repairing to these fountains themselves advertency to the scope and intent of
Traditions whether by Word or Epistle delivered to us 2. Thes 2 15 Ans It is there shewed 1. That the Apostolick Authority whether in speaking or writing was the same and that to both the Church was to give the same credit 2. That what was taught from the Apostle by word was the very same delivered by Epistle but thence can be no ground for receiving of Traditions of the Church of Rome which are not only different from the Scripture but visibly conâ—rary thereto when neither Scripture Reason nor Antiquity discover their being delivered by the Apostles Qu. Is not Oral Tradition such as cannot possibly deceive whereby the Christian Faith and true sense of the Scripture hath been delivered down from hand to hand and from one age to another Ans To this of late doth a part of this of late doth a part of the Romish Church fly though nothing more visibly repugnant to Scripture and Reason if men but open their eyes to see 1. That no more sure and plain delivery of the Truth can be to us by speaking than by writing nor can it be possibly judged how a certainty of the sense of their traditional Doctrine should be more than that of the Scripture 2. This were to resolve our Faith not on the Testimony of God in his Word but on what the Father Forefathers have told to the Children and in effect to pass from all certainty of the Christian Faith and to deny that Doctrine of Christ and way of being eternally saved which with most convincing evidence is delivered to us in the Scripture 3. We see how far Tradition in a few Ages differeth from it self and hath been the rise of such fabulous Romances the World is full of about matters of fact from former times yea how oft the Church hath been almost swallowed up of ignorance and errour so that if one would trace back the Divinity of Christ by Tradition they should go near to lose the scent when it came to Athanasiâ—s's time whilst the whole Christian world seemed to be Arrian Qu. Is there no necessity of Tradition when the Scripture is not sufficient to refute all Heresies in the Church Ans Can it be possible to understand Heresies but as they are against the Scripture or how to have another conception thereof and yet that not sufficient for their refutation this is I confesse a Doctrine meet for such who can make contradictions meet and agree at their pleasure SECT VIII Qu. HAve we not safe and unanswerable ground from the Antiquity of the Romish Doctrine and its long continued succession to found an infallible assurance of its Truth Ans None can deny these 1. That the Scripture is the truest Antiquity and what is not according to this is a novelty brought in on the Church 2. That the rise and pedegree of the Man of Sin must be trac'd back to the very times of the Apostles in his beginning to work whose gradual breaking-up did then hasten to a more full appearance 3. But it is most clear also that the Primitive Church for some Ages knew no such thing as Popery in so horrid a corrupâ—ing of the Christian Doctrine that after followed nor what an Universal Bishop and his Infallibility meaned Qu. But can any evidence be found from these first times of the Christian Church that will import a contradicting of the Popish Doctrine as it is now professed Ans There are no accidents where the thing it self hath no being nor could these possibly write against Poperie in such heads as the Romish Infallibility the worship of Images and Saints c. before they were once brought to light but by undeniable consequence it is clear they held the Scripture to be the alone Rule and foundation of the Christian Faith therefore not the Romish Church and that the Counsel of God was clearly revealed in the same therefore not to be shut up as the fountain of errour Yea that there are but two places after death without the least touch or mentioning such a thing as Purgatory This also was the known Doctrine of the first times that Faith in Christ was the alone way of Salvation therefore not by oâ—r own merit SECT IX Qu. IS not the Doctrine of Merit for which the Romish Church so much contend agreeable to the Scripture and such as we may securely rest upon That men by their own Righteousness and the merit of works may be saved Ans It is clear we must go to Heaven by Merit though not our own yea upon the exactest terms of Justice it is due to him who hath paid the price to the utmost value that none of his purchase be lost but to us it is only of Grace Nor can such Works be meritorious where 1. We owe all and do nothing which is not a debt upon us being Not our own but bought with a price 1 Cor. 6 17. 2. Where no equality proportion or suitablenesse can be betwixt the Work and the Reward as is clear 2 Cor. 4 17. Rom. 3 28. 3. Which at the best have some spot and stain cleaving thereto and come so short to answer what the Law requires Isa 64 4. But we are all as an unclean thing and all our righteousness as filthy rags 4. It is most directly contrary to the Scripture Rom. 11 6. If by grace it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace Rom. 4 4. Nâ—w to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt but to him who worketh not but believeth in him who justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousness and chap. 3 28. Wherefore we conclude that we are justified by faith without the deeds of the Law Qu. Yet may not some in an unconverted state deserve a conferring of Grace upon them by putting themselves forth to the utmost for their own conversion which the Romish Church calleth the Merit of congruity Ans From the Scripture it is clear that before renewing Grace all are the Children of wrath who of themselves cannot frame their thoughts to that which is good nor have an active concurrence for such a change 2 Cor. 3 5. And that the alone cause which maketh one to differ from another is that Rom. 9 vers 15. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy Therefore no plea for Merit by any improvement of mens natural abilities Qu. But do not the works of the Regenerate which follow Justification deserve eternal life not from the Imputation of Christ's righteousness but from their own intrinsick worth and proportionableness to the Reward which is called the Merit of condignity Ans This were to subvert the whole contrivance of the Gospel which is a judicial transferring our sin as a debt on Christ the Surety and of his Righteousnesse and Merit to be imputed to us for our Justification without any respect to works and layeth down the very same way of life which was in the Covenant of Works as
is clear 2 Cor. 5 21. Qu. Is not Heaven held forth is a Reward so as our works do merit by bargain and covenant Mat. 20 12. Ans No reward of debt can be found there as that which is in strick Justice due but to shew it is only of Grace and no proportion betwixt that which is given and their working We see these who came in at the last hour had the same measure with them who had wroâ—ght all the day Math. 20 9. Nor can any Merit be in that claim and reckoning the greatest labourer must still say when he hath done all that he can That he is but an unprofitable servant Luke 17 10. Qu. Is it not promised Rev. 3 4. That some shall walk with Chrest in white because they are worthy Ans There it is clear the Lord doth account them so whom he hath accepted in his Son and for whose sake alone it is 1 Cor. 4 7. For who makes thee to differ from another and what hast thou which thou hast not received then if thoâ— didest receive it why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received Qu. Is there no necessity of works here even in order to salvation Ans We know 1. This is the way in which God hath commanded us to walk for our attaining Salvation 2. Though they be not causes of our Justification yet they are necessarily required in the subject and person justified as the inseparable fruits of justifying Faith by which it is made evident to others Jam. 2 16. 3. They are of singular use for a Christians comfort and assurance 4. They bring much honour to God Joh. 15 8. But it is sure nothing can be more clear than the Doctrine of the reformed Church is in asserting this SECT X. Qu. IF there be no humane Satisfaction and Merit what safe adventuring can be on the overmeriting of some for others and that Treasure in the Church of Romes hand from the works of Superrogation whereon their Absolutions and Indulgences depend Ans So horrid an Imposture may let us see what it is to be given up unto strong delusion When it is so clear 1. That the wise Virgins could spare no oyl out of their lamps to others Matt. 25 9. 2. That Every one must prove his own work and bear his own burthen Gal. 6 6. 3. If we credit the fulnesse of Christs Satisfaction and its Infinite value as the Scripture holds it forth Heb. 10 14. Who by one offering hath perfected for ever those who are sanctified and Heb. 7 25. That he is able to save to the utmost then no use can be alledged for this supply of humane Satisfaction 4. Let men but exercise Reason and consider how this possibly can be known that such an overplus of Merit is sure or more than they need themselves and where any Rule can be found which the Scripture never shewed how to apply the same or in whose hand this trust is to be put Qu. Is not the Satisfaction of Christ only for the guilt of mortal sins and to free us from eternal punishment but not of temporal therefore we see a filling up of what is behind of the Sufferings of Christ for his body which is the Church Col. 1 24. Ans 1. It is clear that Jesus Christ made a perfect reconciliation for sin Dan. 9 24. John 1 29. And no mite left for us to pay by him who answered the full price 2. What the Apostle there shews none can aver was of Christs expiatory sufferings but to shew that as his sufferings were the price of our Redemption so were they a seal and witness to the truth Joh. 18 37 In which respect the Saints also have their share in all following ages to fill up the sufferings of Christ in his body which is the Church as a testimony to the Truth which the great Witness himself did seal and confirm with his Blood who before Pontius Pilate gave a good Confession Qu. Yet may not this warrant such plenary Indulgences and Absolutions of the Romish Church and a power to apply the Merit of others which is so express Joh. 20 23. Whose soever sins ye remit shall be remitted Ans It is a sad commentary destroying the Text which here hath respect to Church-Censures and is to shew what Authority the Ministers of Christ are cloathed with and impowered by their Masters commission to declare sinners bound or loosed from their sins according to the validity of that declarative sentence thus ensured as they follow that rule for the same in the exercise of Church Discipline but not the least ground is here for such plenary Indulgences they pretend or to absolve and relieve Souls out of Purgatory SECT XI Qu. IS there not clear ground for the Doctrine of Purgatory whereon a great stress of many of the Romish principles visibly lyes that though there be an acquittance from eternal death for the truely penitent yet is there a place after this life where they must for a time be tormented and suffer these pains of Purgatory to expiate venial sins which their Prayers and Pennances here could not do Ans The Scripture hath revealed no such thing but thence it is clear 1. That sin by the Blood of Christ only can be expiated and is his alone work who hath purged our sin himself Heb. 1 3. 2. That forgiveness from the Lord to those who repent is with no reserve of venial sins or a temporal punishment for such to satisfie justice Ezeck 18 22. All his transgressions which hath committed shall not be mentioned Heb. 8 12. I will be merciful to their unrighteousnesse and their sins and iniquities I will remember no more 3. From the Scripture we can know only a two fold state of men after this life Joh. 3 36. And two wayes that accordingly lead thereto Matth. 7 14. Strait is the way that leadeth unto life and the way to destruction broad The Apostle sheweth that no middle place is betwixt the Saints being vncloathed and cloathed upon 2 Cor. 5 1 2. 5. The unconverted Theif found no Purgatory by the way who had no Pennances nor Church Indulgences to lead him by the same if the Infinite Merits of Christ were not sufficient for all In a word this doth manifestly charge God with Injustice as exacting double satisfaction for sin one from Christ the other from the sinner Qu. But doth not the Apostle shew there is a being saved yet so as by fire 1 Cor. 3 15. Ans Nothing can be more plain if any read that Scripture than that there is a figurative expression and the same with verse 13. The fire shall try every mans work Which none can expound to be Purgatory but that not without temporal loss so as to have their work burned these shall escape Qu. Are not some venial sins which a temporal punishment may be sufficient to expiat and therefore such paines do follow sin here as might evince a Purgatory after this
to put a handsome shape on this device or how the World can know upon any sure gronud 1. How Peter was at Rome or that he was setled in a peculiar manner Bishop in that See which neither Scripture nor the most ancient records of the Church gives the least shadow of ground for 2 How the Pope becometh his Successor or upon what warrant yea that this should be an Article of mens faith where the Scripture is wholly silent 3. How that pretended succession to Peter in that particular Diocess of Rome should have a Catholick Power and Headship over the whole Church annexed thereto so as all who succeed in in the one must also in the other 4. How a warrantable Succession of each particular Pope can be made sure to the Apostle upon this pretended right and that he hath lawfully succeeded since if this be nul and the election be unlawful they have then with their own consent no promise of Assistance nor obedience in this case due 5. When it is so clear that the Power of the Keyes were given no less to the rest of the Apostles then to Peter as is express Matth. 18 18 19. yea that Peter claimed no such presidence amongst the rest of the Apostles as may be seen Act. 15. upon what ground can they thus refound so great a claime as this Oh what an amazing infatuation are those in who should take this upon trust the very recital whereof is so obvious a refutation of it self And that on such a pretended Power and Supremacy of Peter the whole weight and superstructure of the Romish Hierarchy must leane yea which is of a higher concerne that on this by undeniable consequence must be rolled over a weight no less than the eternal interest and perishing of many millions of souls who upon this Plenary Power and Infallibility of the Pope thus founded upon such a ground do adventure with such an Acquittance and Absolution as their security into another World 5. That notable device of Purgatory may be a convincing witness to the horrid imposture of Popery than which nothing could have been more subservient to that great designe of a lucrative interest and to keep the people under a continued aw and terror yea what improvement for so many ages they have made of this for their own private gain that it may be seen the Romish Church should lose one of the greatest revenues it hath if purgatory were not kept up amongst them is beyond reckoning by themselves what continued income this hath had quantum haec fabula profuit Romanae Ecclesiae But Oh! such as will thus adventure hereon may have saddest cause to feare that this Purgatory on their immediat parting with time be found a real hell whence no release or Possibility thereof can be though all the treasures of the earth could be given for the same and then shall know this sad verification of this truth 2 Thes 2 11 12. Which so expresly points at Antichristian Popery for this cause God shall send them strong delusion to believe a lye because they received not the Love of the Truth that they might be saved that they all may be damned who believe not the Truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness 6. What strange account do their legends give of their pretended Miracles as the most effectual way to gain câ—edit to these Doctrines which they see can have no possible founding 〈◊〉 the Scripture such as that we may judge those who are but in the least knowing amongst them wonder how Credit could be expected from any thereto such as they tell us of S. Francis how he was greater then John the Baptist and better then all the Apostles who in Vision received the Wounds of Christ suffered the same griefs in whom all vertues of the Saints as well under the Old as under the New Testament ar put unitivè conjunctivè and after most blasphemously puts him in the same roome with our most blessed Lord by reason of a scedule which they say Leo the Friar saw descend from Heaven and fell on the Head of Francis whereon was write this man is the grace of God and example of all perfection c. This Book wherein these yea where more horride blasphemies are written called liber conformitatum impressis Bononiae Fol. 3 250. is called by them their golden book with this express clause underneath by a general consent of the Chapter of that Order â—ye have searched this book and found nothing worthy of correction Such an instance also is he whom they call St Dominick of whom they shew that Christ raised three only from the dead but S. Dominick three in one City that he had the Angels at his Service but it may be easy to judge what Angels they were how the Elements did obey him and the Devils trembled at him how he had a star in his forehead when he was Baptized and restored fourty strangers to life that where over whelmed in a ship and long under the water with much more of this kind published to the World by Anthony an Archbishop of his Order Anthon. Arch. Pag. 3 23. but with these famous instances may be sitly joined two Nunes no less known and publick who if they had lived in one time and their order could have allowed it might have been suteably matcht with other the one is Magdalena de Cruce Abbess of a Monastery of Franciscan Nunnes who by the Power of the Devil appeared to Mariners in a storme at sea when invocate and the storme calmed was sometimes lift up into the air and the Sacrament went up visibly out of the Priests hand that said Mass through the air before all that look on unto her was of such repute that not only many ladies in Spain but the Queen also when she was near to be brought to bed sent the mantles wherein the Child was to be wrapt for her to bless yet at length upon clearest discovery and her own confession found to be a witch in express compact with the Devil since she was nine Years old so as the Spanish Inquisitors could not get shifted some forme of Sentence against her Anno 1540. A passage the truth whereof the Romish Church will not offer to disown the relation being so publick and known by their own writers And indeed she was well suted to be an Abbess of S Francis Order The other Instance is that relation set forth by one Stephen de Lusignan dedicated to the French Queen of the great Miracles in the Year 1586 which hapned to the Prioress de le Annonciado of Lisbon in Portugal approved by the greatest Church men there whose names are set down how usually Christ appeared to her and talked with her and had the impress of his five wounds put upon her with many such strange things so as severals were incited through the fame of her to become Nunnes yet at last was by a mervellous providence from the Lord
this we appeal our adversaries to produce one essential difference betwixt the one and the other from the Records of these times or any Writings of the Fathers 3. That no evidence can be given in contending for the Christian Faith against Heathens and to hold forth the certainty thereof which doth not undeniably answer to confirm the Protestant Religion 4. That in the writings of the greatest Adversaries their bitter invectives against Christianity who in the first times did oppose themselves to the same Doctrine the Protestant Church now owns and professeth such as Câ—â—sus Tryphon Porphyrie Lucian c. There is not the least mention of Popery in any of these Articles against which the Protestant Church contends nor of the Romish Supremacy and Infallibility where they could have had so great advantage to object against the Christian Cause and call its Truth in question Nor did the Jews who objected all they could against the Christian Faith in the least once mention any such points as are now controverted betwixt them and us 5. It is clear from unquestionable Historie and confession of our Adversaries that a continued succession of Orthodox Doctors who did confesse and teach the same Doctrine for the substance that we own have in no times been wanting to the Church nor some visible partie to withstand Poperie and keep up a witnesse to the Truth even in the greatest darknesse as the Romish Writers are forced to confesse That the Protestants now are the same which the Waldenses were of old and the Berengarians before them Qu. Doth not the Popish Religion found on such grounds and Principles as can bring a sufficient certainty therewith of its Truth when it hath the Decrâ—es Canons and infallible Decisions of their Church to warrant the same and of the Pope as Supreme Head Ans According to their Doctrine Principles they can have no possible certaintie of their Religion nor of that they pretend to found on When 1. They are not agreed nor ever like to be who that infallible Judge is or in whom such an Infallibilitie as they claim is seated whether in a General Council or the Pope alone So as they are in greatest contradiction to other about the very foundation of their Faith nor is this a controversie amongst a few but one part of their Church with greatest heat is opposing the other therein 2. They can have no assurance if they have any Church at all and whether most of their Popes Bishops and Priests be not without Baptism and still laicks without Ordination when their Doctrine and the Council of Trent so expreslie hold the efficacie of all Sacraments of which they reckon Ordination as well as Baptism to be one to depend on the Intention of the Priest who officiates of which none possiblie can be sure 3. Such have no rational certaintie of what they professe to believe who are with their own consent shut out from all proper knowledge of the Scripture and on the testimonie of men must resolve their Faith 4. Is it not on a matter of fact and most doubtful Relation they ground their Faith and adventure their immortal soul where scarce a Shadow or School-problem is to bear up the whole Fabrick of Poperie which is an alledged Presidence of Peter amongst the Apostles while no demonstration can ever be given that Peter was at Rome or that he was Bishop there or if the same priviledges be intailed to his Successours and how these should be chosen in after-times 5. According to their Principles they have no Bible nor any such Authentick Record to prove Religion but what is a Masâ—e of dead unsensed Characters that hath no articulate voice or intelligible sound until the Romish Clergie put a sense thereon So that the verie Letter of the Scripture is most evidentlie past from For my self I dare say before him who knoweth all things that I would tremble and stand in a we of any deceit or mistake in the matter of Religion and have in greatest earnest sought to be perswaded of the Truth without respect to interest party or education as that wherein I know an eternal salvation is concerned but can see no way to embrace Poperie except men turn Atheists yea quit all Religion and Reason at once Qu Is not Rome the Catholick and Apostolick Church out of which there is no Salvation Ans We know there is a Catholick Church under the Gospel that consists of all who imbrace the Christian Faith whether bond or free Jewes or Gentiles and is to no particular Nation People or language restricted as under the Law But that the Romish Church can have no possible claim here is unanswerable 〈◊〉 Because no Institution is in the Scripture of such a Church as consisteth of all Christians subjected to one humane Head and Supreme Governour under Jesus Christ on the Earth or where subjection to the Pope is made a condition to Salvation 2. It is clear that in the Apostles time and for many Ages after the Christian Catholick Church had a being when it had no dependence on the See of Rome nor was known by any such Test as to own the Pope and his Supreme Jurisdiction except it be averred that there was one Catholick Church before the setting up of Papacy and the other since essentially different from the former 3. There is no accesse to deny that they are more and of greater extent in the world who embrace the Christian Faith and have no communion with the See of Rome or their Doctrine than such who are subjected thereto 4. As there is on Faith and one Lord Jesus Christ so is there but one body which is his Church united to him as her Head Eph. 4 3. 4. Which is the prorogative of the Son of God alone and incommunicable to any to be the Head thereof but he who for this end died and rose that he might be the Lord of the dead and of the living Rom. 14 9. Qu. Yet is not still the same Christian Religion at least for substance held forth in the Popisâ— Doctrine which the Protestant Church owns Ans Whatever in words such pretend their Principles and the known Doctrine of the Council of Trent can too visibly resolve this that these do not retain the Christian Faith in the essentials thereof but have razed the very foudation who resolve not their Faith on the Scripture and its Divine Authority but on a humane testimony and deny religious worship to be due to the true God alone but give it unto Angels and Men also who lay another foundation to build on than Jesus Christ another Purgatorie than his blood to purifie us from all sin another Propitiatorie Sacrifice to expiate sin than his Death who was once offered to bear the sins of many Heb. 9 28 another merite than his obedience by which we are made righteous and thus make void the great intent of the Gospel laying down a way of Life and Salvation on the same