ordinance of the Christian Sabbaoth Therefore it is according to the will and ordinaunce of God The proposition is grounded on 1. Cor. 10. 11. 15. 14. 32. Mat. 13. 11. Dan. 12. 3. Psal 107. 43. Io. 5. 20. Io. 7. 17. The assumption is confirmed on the euidence and truth of such effectes in all the godly of all places and times since the Apostles to our times And the serious and iudiciall Considerer shall obserue them both Ministers and people among us in this Land to go no further to be the most religious zealous conscionable and faithfull Christians and most of all profiting and growing in all grace and knowledge that with conscience delight and diligence doe effectually sanctify the Lords day 2. Again That ordinance tending to Gods publicke seruice and glory and mans instruction and building vp in godlinesse and is grounded on Gods word the which is disliked disputed against cauilled at withstood broken and profaned by the most carnall vngodly irreligious corrupt and vaine persons must needs be most agreeing to the wisdome will of God Such is the ordinaunce of the holy obseruation of the Lords day Therefore it is most agreeing to the wisdome and will of God The Maior or first proposition is grounded on 1. Cor. 1. 18. and 2. 14. and 3. 19. Mat. 13. 11. Io. 3. 3. Rom. 8. 5. 7. The assumption or Minor is grounded on Psa 92. 1. 2. 6. and confirmed by experience For he that shall vnpartially obserue this truth shall finde that the Sabbaoth euery where is onely disliked withstood disgraced disputed against rayled at scorned profaned by the most profane carnal couetous Atheists libertines men of no conscience holiness◠or truth in them and such as eyther liue in vnlawfull callings or vnlawfully in their honest callings such as fidlers stage-players beare and bull-baiters gamesters drunkards vsurers papists families of loue theeues vagrantrogues wearers oppressors coseners Epicures and voluptuous liuers 3. Againe That doctrine practise and perswasion the vvhich is grounded in the Scripture and is most agreeable to godlines peace of a good conscience and fits a Christian best to appeare with security of hart ioy before the iudgemēt seate of Christ that doctrine perswasiō must needs be more agreeable to Gods wil then contrary such is the doctrine practise and perswasiō of keeping holy the Christiā Sabbaoth or Lords day therfore the keeping holy of the lords day togither with the doctrine and perswasion of the same is most agreeable to the will of God 4. And last of all that doctrine practise and perswasion differing from the practise of the Apostles and all Apostolicall Churches and teachers yea from the doctrine practise of the Church wherin they liue the which is most agreeable to the will of man the wisdome of the fleshe the manners of the wicked the state of ignorance and sinne and of an euill conscience the hindrance of the Gospell the the breach of all good Discipline and order in the Church and the very high way to Atheisme carnall liberty and all impious licentiousnesse and confusion and so by consequence procuring and increasing the wrath and iudgement of God or euen but tending therunto or any part therof is impious and vngodly Such is the iudgement and practise of the deniers or disgracers or opposite disputers or omitters or profaneners of the Lords day and of those also that teach a liberty of breaking or omitting of the Lords day Therfore such iudgement practise or perswasion is impious wicked And so much of the second Quaestion 66 The third Quaestion and the last concerning this Controuersie of the Christian Sabbaoth is this VVhether the Church of GOD might haue chosen at the first another day or hath yet authority or Christian libertie to abrogate or alter the Lords day into any other certaine or vncertaine day or whether it be not of necessity to be obserued to the end of the World 67 This Quaestion because it dependeth on the former therfore the affirmation and proofe of the former prooueth also the negation of the former part hereof and the affirmation of the later the which I therfore will the more briefely handle as a point sufficiently confirmed 68 The first Reason The Church hath no Christian liberty to alter any day the which hath absolute Commaundement in the Word The Christian Sabbaoth or Lords day hath absolute Commaundement in the Word as alreadie hath been proued Therefore the Church hath no Christian liberty to alter the Lords day into any other 69 The second Reason The Church could neuer alter any part of the Morall law or of the lawe of Nature nor cannot alter the morall ordinances and constitutions of the inspired Apostles The obseruation or keeping holy of one day of euery seauen is of the Morall lawe and law of Nature and besides the keeping holy of the first day of the weeke is a constitution and commaundement of the inspired Apostles Therefore the Church coulde not nor cannot alter the keeping holy of one day of seauen vnto God nor the keeping holy of the first day of the weeke to Christ 70 The third Reason whatsoeuer Christ ascribeth as his owne and proper to himselfe no Church or Christian ought or may ascribe vnto themselues But Christ ascribeth as proper to himselfe that he is the Lord of the Sabbaoth Therefore no church or person may ascribe the Sabbaoth of Christ to himselfe and so by consequence may not profane nor alter the Lords day into any other 71 The fourth Reason By whatsoeuer onely power the Iewish Sabbaoth was abrogated the Christian Sabbaoth instituted by the same power and none other can it be abrogated againe But by the only power of Christ his Consummatum est or sacrifice was the Iewish Sabbaoth abrogated and by vertue of his resurrection the Lords day originally instituted and by Apostolicall power and authority the one relinquished and the other practiced Therefore by the only power of Christ and his Apostles and by none other can the Lords day be abolished againe 72 The fift Reason If there cannot come so long as the world lasteth so great a cause of changing the Lords day as the Apostles had of ordaining it Then the Church cannot abolish the Lords day to the end of the world But so great cause of abolishing the Lords day the Church can neuer haue as the Apostles had of ordayning namely the resurrection and rest of Christ Therefore the Church cannot abolish the Lords day to the end of the world 73 The sixth and last Reason If the Church haue no farther aucthority then by the word of God either in generall or speciall to appoint or alter any thing established then the Church can neuer alter the Lords day nor appoint any other in the steade thereof But the former is true and therefore also the later For there is no shadowe of authority or ground eyther generall or speciall in the word touching the alteratiō of
1. Why not also with the Sabbaoth or day of holy rest seeing he ascribes it to himselfe Matth. 12. 8. And as Christ is called the Lord. Io. 20. 18. 25. 28. and 21 7. 15. 16. 1. Cor. 11. 23. and the phrases are proper that runne after this tenor the Lords Table 1. Cor. 10. 21. The Lords Supper 1. Cor. 11. 20. The Lords Cup. 1. Cor. 10. The Lords body 1. Cor. 11. 27. 29. The Lords death 1. Cor. 11. 26 So it is not vainly but most properly said The Lords day Reu. 1. 10. as properly ascribing it to Christ the Lord of Lords 56 The third Reason A Matori If the rest of God the Father were the cause of sanctifying of a day It followeth that where a greater and more excellent rest is there must of necessity followe a more ample sanctification But the rest of the Sonne of God is a greater and more excellent by how much the worke of Redemption is greater and more excellent then the worke of creation Therfore the rest of Christ from his worke is the cause of a more ample sanctification of the day of his rest or Resurrection which is our Lords day Apoc. 1. 10. Againe If there be the same cause and reason of sanctifying that day on which our Sauiour Christ accomplished our Redemption and restitution of the World as there vvas of sanctifying the day in vvhich the Lord rested from the creation of the World then a day in memoriall of the later ought as necessarily to be obserued and sanctified as the day was in memorial of the former But the same cause or reason remaineth whether wee respect the rest of Christ as well as the rest of the Father Heb. 4. 10. Or whether wee respect the glory of Christ as well as the glory of the Father Io. 5. 23. Therfore the day of Christ his rest or resurrection which is our Lords day is no lesse necessarily by vs to be obserued then the former Sabbaoth of the Iewes Briefly thus If the very rest of God the Father bee alleaged as sufficient Io. 15. 15. and 16. 13 14. 26. Act. 20. 20. ♌ Vide supra §. â—0 Num. 4. Hooper on the 4. Com. fol. â—5 Piscatâ—r in Genes 2. 3. fol. 52. cause to ty the Iews coÌ„science to the sanctifying of the Iewish Sabbaoth Then the very rest of Christ may be alleaged as a iust cause to tye the Christians conscience to the sanctifying of the Christian Sabbaoth but the former is true as Exod. 20. 11. Therefore the later is also true 57 The fourth Reason The Apostleâ— ordinances coÌ„mandements and constitutions are the coÌ„mandements of Christ Act. 15 24. 28. 29. 1. Cor. 14. 37. 7. 17. 11. 16. 2. Thess 3. 6. 7. Luke 10. 16. For besides the Apostles in matter of Gods seruice were led by the holy Ghost into all truth and coulde not erre But the Iewish Sabbaoth in practise was altred and the first day of the weeke established and ordayned for the Christian Sabbaoth by the ordinance constitution and commandement of the inspired ♌ Apostles 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. As I haue ordayned so do you which words say BB. Hooper and Piscator do plainly imply a commandemeÌ„t as the words I haue ordained do imply an Apostolical ordinance Therfore the Christian Sabbaoth or first day of the weeke was in practise ordained and commanded by Iesus Christ himselfe 58 The fift Reason Is drawne from the euidence of scriptures plainly declaring that the Lords day was both ordained and practised by the Apostles Apostolicall Churches to whose examples our Churches Christians are and ought in all godlinesse to be coÌ„formed The places are a Chrysostom â—edâ— Gualter Aretius Beza Geneua note Lyra Erasmus Vatablus Emmanuel Sa. Rhemâ—sts in hunc locum Chemmnit Martyr Zanchius Vrsinus Piscâ—tor Iunius Pezâ—lâ—us Fulke Babington Perkins Zepperus in locâ—s citatâ—â— Marlorati Enchiridioâ— Tit. dâ—es dominicus Bucholch Chron. â— proleg f. 22. Bellar. vbi supra cap. 11. Act. 20. 7. b Chrysost Ambr. Hierom. Reâ—â—g Prâ—masius Theophilact in hunc locum August epist 119. cap. 13. Beza Bullinger Martyr Aretius Pezelius Gualter Geneua note Lyra. Erasmus Vatablus Emmanuel Sa. Rhemists in hunc locum Chemnitius Zanchius Vrsinus BB. Hooper Piseator Zepperus Iunius Bucholcher Marlolorati Enchir. Fulk Booke of Homil. Babing Bellar. Felisius Cathec Rom. locis citatâ— Sutcliffe inâ—tit fideâ— fol. 11. 1. Cor. 16. 2. c â—lemens â—an Apostol Ignatius Iustinus Tertullian Clemens Alexand. Orig. Athan. Ambr. Hieronym August Gregorius Magnus Leo. Hylarius Occâ—â—neâ—ius Primasius Ansâ—â—â— Martyr Bulling Beza Iunius Chemnitius Zanchius Sadeâ—l Vrsinus Pezelius Heming Piscator Aretius Bucholcher Marlorati Enchirid. Book of Hom. Fox Fulke Babington Perkins Sutcliffe Geneua note Lyra Bellarmine Cathech Rom. Emmanuel Sa. Rhemists locis citatis Reu. 1. 10. Interpreted all of them of the Lords day by all few or none at all besides expositors 1. Fathers Greekes and Latines 2. Later writers Protestant and Papist without disputation or deniall The conclusion of this reason is Therefore the obseruation of the Lords day is no Tradition or vnwritten verity or doubtfull ordinance but hath cleare ground and warrant of the word and so dooth tye the conscience So also doe the duties and circumstances that out of these places may clearely bee concluded As namely 1. That it was named by an inspired Apostle the Lords day which is as much to say as the Christian Sabboth Reu. 1. 10. 2. It was ordeined also and established by an inspired Apostle not lightly vainly or erroniously but coÌ„mandingly with Apostolicall authority 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. 3. It was the first day of the week Act. 20. 7. 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. 4. This assembly was weekly 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. 5. It was vsuall to other places and times viz. the Churches of Corinth and Galatia 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. of Troas Act. 20. 7. of Pathmos where Iohn was and that aboue 40. yeares after Reu. 1. 10. 6. That day the word preached the Sacraments administred Praier Act. 20. 7. 10. 16. 7. That day the works of mercy and collections for the poore Act. 20. 10. 12. 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. 8. That day they rested from the ordinarie labors of their calling 1. Cor. 16. 1. 2. 59 The sixt Reason Is drawne from the enumeration of circumstances notably falling out yet not in vaine but to some necessary purpose nor yet by chance but by Gods singular prouidence and appointment as may appeare by the greatnesse of the works vpon this day 1. The resurrection Rest of Christ vpon this day Luk. 24. 6. Heb. 4. 10. 2. Christ his first apparition to his Disciples vpon this day Io. 20. 19. 3. Christ his second apparition to them that same day seuen-night Io. 20. 26. 4. The holy Ghosts apparition to them on that day Act. 2. 1. 2. 5. The Apostles teaching ministring the Sacraments on the same day Act. 20. 7. 6. The Apostle Iohn his
the Lords day or appointing of any other in the steade thereof And finally vnlesse the Church hath the same infallible warrant to bee led into all truth as the inspired Apostles had which the Papists falsly affirme but wee constantly deny the Church can neuer haue equall power in abolishing the obseruation of the first day of the weeke as the Apostles had in ordayning and so by consequence can it neuer be lawfully accomplished for want of due power to performe the same So that it followeth by ineuitable consequence that the keeping holy of the Lords day or first day of the weeke must vnremoouedly stand vnto the end of the World And so an end of this third and last question 74 Now touching the obiections that are alleaged against the keeping holy of the Lords day they are of sundry sorts as are the various apprehensions and opinions of men erring on the right and left hand of the truth The which their differing cauillations albeit it were not quite amisse to haue cōfuted on either side yet I haue thought it fitter at this time to let them passe least the Reader might be rather tyred then instructed the rather because the most of them in very deed are but of froathy feeble nature and are not able to stand or to maintaine themselues the day reuealing them to bee but false and the fire but stubble being grounded on an euill conscience maintained by more subtilty then truth or art answered by sundry others and are aboundantly confuted by the former reasons Only I purpose to take notice and giue answere vnto the cauillations of our present times vvhich beare the greatest shewe both against the things alleaged for the truth as also for establishment of their owne errour 75 Against the places of Scripture alleaged for the Christian Sabbaoth They say that the reasons drawn from Act. 20. 7. 1. Cor. 16. 2. make nothing for the confirmation of the Lords day For that the Greeke word soundeth in both places one of the Sabbaoths which being literally vnderstood must needs haue reference to the Iewes Sabbaoth not to the first day of the weeke which is our Lords daie To vvhich obiection first I oppose the maine streame of all Interpreters that euer vvere both olde and newe that vnderstand them for the first day of the vveeke and doe so translate them Secondly I say it is an Hebraisme or Hebrewe kinde of speech vsuall in the Scriptures to set downe One insteade of the first as Gen. 1. 5. Mat. 28. 1. Mark 16 9. Luke 24. 1. Io 20. 1. And the word Sabbaoth for a Weeke As Leuiticus 25. 8. Luke 18. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thus doe Caluin Martyr Beza B B. Hooper and euen the learned Papists Erasmus Iansenius Bellarmine Emanuel Sa and sundry others obserue vpon these places And further for the place of the 1. Corinth 16. 2. It is very euident out of the Fathers Iustinus Tertullian and others that from the ordinance of the Apostles grounded on this place the primitiue times did make collections for the poore on this very day vvhich vvas the first day of the vveeke celebrated by them to the honour of Christ his resurrection and publique vvorship of God as Zanchius that most learned and iudiciall Diuine doth soundly conclude Besides ther want not ancient manuscripts to make this place more manifest by adding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Text as Beza noteth and Cryspine in his greeke Testament together vvith Wechelus in his edition of the Septuaginta doe expresse Touching the place of Apoc. 1. 10. vvhich maketh cleere mention of the Lords day the obseruation whereof is seconded by the Primitiue Fathers and Churches immediatly succeeding the writer of that book they haue nothing to alleage but that they holde it doubtfull whether that book be Canonicall or not Which cauill albeit it bee vnanswerably confuted by Beza and sundry others yet I iudge it sitter to be decided by a cudgell of the Magistrates owne faggot or the hatchet rather then to be notized or vouchsafed the peaceable or quiet answere of sober men for that it must needs be an opinion of insolent and palpable lewdnesse that cannot stand but by calling the vndoubted Scriptures of canonical authority and principles of the Christian faith in quaestion 76 For the confirmation of their most weake and bad opiniō they brokenly alleage certaine Scriptures from which they draw euen by the eares against their wils three seuerall conclusions The first conclusion is this The fourth Cōmandement is meerely Ceremoniall and therfore vtterly abolished and is Iewish to obserue To this I say in generall it crosseth all mens iudgemens that euer were of any note as in parte appeareth These 20. and therfore is actually absurde and a very Nouel and is besides the doore to Atheisme carnall liberty and all profanenesse a manifest disabling of the other 9. Commandements occasion of neglect giuen to them especially that care for none For further answere to this bare Assertion Look Thes 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. But for the Scriptures they alleage for the ground of this their Conclusion as Exodus 31. 13. 16. and 35. 2. Ezechiel 20. 12 They are too short for their position for these places prooue the Iewish Sabbaoth to haue in it something ceremoniall transitory and as the shadowe abolished by Christ the substance Coloss 2. 16. 17. in that parte wherein it was ceremoniall which was meerly proper to the Iewe but by this they disproue not the Sabbaoth dayes politicall respecte of rest of the bodies of ourselues our seruants and our Cattell Exodus 20. 17. with Deu. 5. 14. and morall part therof which is the publick worship of God Exo. 20. 9. 10. which are perpetually to remain as the other laws of like equity nature being especially by Christ confirmed and by his Apostles and Primitiue Churches continued and by vs therefore to bee practised to the Worlds end VVherefore the stricte obseruation also of a holy rest or Sabbaoth vnto God in the new Testament is not a Iewish thing For seeing the Iewe did rest by a mixt reason Iunius de polit Mosis cap. 8. partly morall partly politicall and partly ceremoniall We rest in no sense for the later but the former two Namely first for the Morall and then for the politicall respect which seeing they are commaunded vs as strictly and concerne vs at neerely as they did the Iewes wee ought with no lesse conscience to obserue them then the Iews And seeing the actions of men are really distinguished by their ends for which they are done and wee proposing not the Ceremoniall or end proper to the Iewe but onely the Morall common to vs vvith them our stricte obseruing of the Lords day cannot bee counted Iewish though hereby also wee forbid the verie gathering of any sticke or kindling of anie fire that shall hinder the seruice of GOD in our selues or others 77 The second Conclusion that they frame