Selected quad for the lemma: grace_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
grace_n free_a gift_n offence_n 2,391 5 9.5104 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A63766 The great propitiation, or, Christs satisfaction and man's justification by it upon his faith that is belief and obedience to the gospel endeavored to be made easily intelligible ... in some sermons preached, &c. / by Joseph Truman Truman, Joseph, 1631-1671. 1672 (1672) Wing T3142; ESTC R187555 130,713 376

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of things and I hope you will easily be convinced what are the terms 1. There are the same terms and conditions of Justification and of Salvation Whatsoever is the condition of the one is also of the other For the Apostle argueth in the same manner against salvation by works as justification by works Yea it is apparent in the nature of the thing for Justification passively taken as I told you before is nothing else but right to salvation and we need no more for Heaven than right to it Do but get and keep right to Heaven which is Justification and we need no more on our part As for possession that is God's work by his Angels carrying away souls raising bodies Many worthy men have said That Repentance sincere Obedience are only for Possession and not for Right But we are not to work for Possession at all we need not get upon a Hill when about to dye to save the Angels a labour of carrying our souls too far Do but get and keep Right and to deny Possession to us if we have right to it by Promise would be unfaithfulness in God which we need not to fear Therefore if you will grant that all the things I have spoken of are required necessary to salvation then they are also to justification Only still it is here as in all other things of like nature Consent hearty consent to the Gospel-terms immediately instateth us in Justification and right to Heaven But if we would have continuance of our Justification and right to Heaven we must continue to consent to those terms as to the sincerity of our hearts and endeavours else we should lose our Justification and right to Heaven and the reason why we cease not to be justified is because God keeps us from departing from him by keeping in us care and watchfulness Thus we see whatsoever we may lawfully do for Salvation the same we may lawfully do for Justification 2. Whatsoever duty there is that if we do not we should have no right to salvation or justification that is a condition of our salvation and justification It is too common a saying and a great upholder of the Antinomian way Do but believe say some and by believing they do not mean as I do the whole of Christianity but some one act as believing my sins are pardoned or reliance or accepting Christ for my Saviour and such acts as accepting Christ for Lord and sincere obedience will follow but they are not conditions of Justification and Salvation but put that one act and they will naturally and inevitably follow But ask them Suppose they do not follow They will answer You must not suppose it they will for they dare not ordinarily say That if they do not follow it you will yet have right to Heaven I will shew you the vanity of such talk This is virtually to say God never made promise to these as conditions never suspended salvation on them but they will follow faith naturally This is to say Godliness hath not the promise of this life or however not of that to come else it would be a condition of the promise The instance that is usually brought of it is this There cannot be a seeing-eye without the body yet it is the eye that only sees So Faith only is the Condition only attains right but cannot be without works Now I will bring this to make it like the case in hand Suppose one promise you such a reward if you bring him and give him the seeing eye of such a Beast we are sure if the meaning be according to the words you would have right to the reward if you brought him a seeing-eye without the body though indeed you cannot yet we are sure if you did you would have right and he would be unjust in denying you the reward though you brought not the body And on the contrary Suppose we be sure this is a truth If you should bring him a seeing-eye it would not attain right without the body Then we are equally sure that we mistook his words or meaning he spake synecdochically for then it is equally a condition that the body be brought as that the seeing-eye be brought and it is equally influential into right for come to those things that do naturally and universally accompany and follow one another and where but one of them is made the condition and the other not the absence of that which is not a condition would no way hinder right and so not right to Justification and Salvation If a man become a Christian indeed it naturally and inevitably follows he shall be hated of wicked men but God never suspending Justification and Salvation upon it never making this a Condition we may truly say If a man be a sincere Christian it would not hinder his justification and salvation though the wicked did not hate him So if it be true that a man cannot be a true Christian but he must eat drink and breathe these are natural Concomitants yet these not being made Conditions though he did never eat drink nor breathe he shall be saved If you can say of any Grace or any measure of Grace as Assurance or Joy That it is not necessary to justification and salvation Then only you may say They are not Conditions of these If any one beloved sin knowingly and wilfully continued in would hinder a man's pardon justification or right to Heaven then a sincere desire and endeavour according to his ability to get rid of that beloved sin is a Condition of his Pardon and Justification 3. All Conditions of Justification and Salvation are equally Conditions equally influential into right If only an accident or mode of a thing be made a Condition with the thing it is equally a Condition with the thing it self If one promise to bring me a white Horse and you shall have such a reward It is equally a condition and as much influential into right that it be White as that it be a Horse so in any instance you can bring either in fact or fiction If I promise something upon condition you bring me a Hundred and you bring only Ninety-nine you have no more right than if you brought none and the odd one is as much a Condition as Ninety-nine If any shall say The Condition is a working Faith then that it be working is equally a Condition and equally influential into right as that it be Faith 4. There is no such thing as receiving Righteousness or Justification or Pardon Many make this their great strong hold Repentance and sincere Obedience are not receptive receiving Graces as Faith is and so cannot receive Justification and Righteousness Now this falls for there is no act of receiving these Justification Right to Heaven Righteousness cometh on Men. The free gift came upon all to justification As by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation As condemnation cometh upon men without any act of receiving it
not by the same natural person and if any Laws do lay any stress on the person of the Debtor so that it shall be judged as no payment except paid in person such are hard Laws and against natural equity so that though payment should justly according to such Munucipal Laws be refusable from another yet it is not fairly tefusable But it is quite otherwise in all Law and natural Equity in the case of obedience and punishment for here the Laws do justly and equitably determine the very person that shall obey or suffer and allow not any delegation as doing or suffering by another so that if another suffer it is not the same in Law if the penalty be suffered by another natural person it is suffered by another person in Law And here Dum alius solvit aliud solvitur therefore such suffering of another contrary to Law may be a satisfaction that the Rector may with hono●r not execute the Law but cannot possibly be an execution of the Law the idem the same threatned I will make all plain to you thus Suppose the Law-threat had run thus If any man sin he shall dye be damned or another for him he or another thus disjunctively either of these would have been the very thing threatned the same in Law as the Principal and Surety are and then all these after-mentioned inconveniences would have followed First In this case had God provided one to dye for us here would have been nothing of pardon Here indeed would have been grace and favour in thus procuring one but nothing of pardon remission of sin for it would not have been a refusable payment either of their deaths would have been the same in Law and so no act of Pardon or Grace to acquit upon it whereas God for Christ's sake forgiveth We have by Eph. 4. 32 his blood the remission of sins This would have been like proper solution and then the strictest Justice cannot deny an acquittance and justification to the party for whom it is paid and there need not be there cannot be in this case any such thing as pardon pardon and full satisfaction may stand together but not pardon and solution or payment e. g. If a Law be made that threatens That for such an offence the Delinquent shall sit in the Stocks or another for him thus disjunctively here would be grace and favour in the Prince to procure one to sit for the offender but nothing of pardon or remission for the utmost rigour of Justice could not refuse to acquit upon it here is no remitting any thing the Law requires no pardon at all for the Law never required the offender himself should suffer but he or another indifferently Secondly It would also in this case be injustice to inflict the least part of the penalty threatned upon the offender when the other hath suffered because it would be to inflict what was never threatned by the Law and so what is not due for the utmost Justice requires no more than the suffering of one of them Thirdly It would also in this case be non-sense or injustice to prescribe the Delinquent terms or conditions on which he should have justification the benefit of the other's death or of the other's sitting in the Stocks or else to have no benefit by them for the offender would have right without performing such conditions And therefore as a plain denying the offender the thing he hath right to would be injustice so to reduce back his absolute right to a conditional would be injustice in part To threaten damnation if men believe not repent not would be something of injustice being a partial denial Fourthly Also in this case the offender would be justified immediately by the other's death by the Law that threatned by the very Law of Works there would need no Covenant of Grace or Gospel-promise it would be injustice to prescribe terms of benefit by it as Faith Repentance as in the other case the Delinquent would have right to impunity for his offence by the other's sitting in the Stocks by the very Law that threatned it There needs no Law of Grace for requital for it is the idem in Law the very thing threatned and so not refusable by the strictest Justice to promise here would be to promise that which we have right to without promise and such promises would not be of Grace but meer Nullities But this death of Christ was a satisfaction much like a refusable payment for the threat was The soul that sinned should dye be damned not he or another The death of Christ was a satisfaction a refusable payment for God might have refused if Christ had interceded as Moses Blot me I pray thee out of the Book of Life for the people and save their souls their lives God might have answered Those that sin against me I have only threatned and those only I will punish but of thee will I require nothing and from thee will I accept nothing For the threat was not If a man sinned he should dye or some other for him for then either of them would have been the idem the same in Law and so not refusable but it was that the offender himself should dye so that whatsoever else than the offender's sufferings could be offered was refusable and so could be but a Satisfaction And then these things will suit and agree 1. Here is pardon and remission in accepting and acquitting for he might have refused to accept of Christ's death and to acquit us upon it It is plainly a not standing to his threat a dispensing with his Law notwithstanding Christ's death for him not to execute the Law upon us though an honourable dispensing with it 2. Being a Satisfaction a refusable payment God may take off what part of the penalty He and his Son agreed from the offender and leave on him what part they please and as long as they please and judg meet And indeed though they did agree and God hath promised for Christ's death-sake that they who perform the Gospel-condition shall not perish but shall have eternal life they shall not undergo eternal sorrows Hell-sorrows yet they never agreed and God never promised that Believers should not be afflicted for their sins in this life or that they should not dye temporally or that the ground as to them should be freed from that first curse or that believing Women should not undergo pain in Child-bearing for these things God doth inflict therefore the Son in paying the ransome and the Father in accepting never agreed they should be freed from them in this life though yet they did so to moderate and help in them and sanctifie by them that a Christian life in this World is worth living Phil. 1. 22. To live in the flesh is worth while 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 operae pretium And it is contrary to all Scripture to say Believers afflictions are not for sin and if they were not for sin they
it is a resultancy from the Law upon disobedience so Justification Right to Heaven is a resultancy from a Law-promise the condition being performed I know you may object that place turned from darkness to light that they may receive remission of sins But one of an ordinary capacity may perceive it is a figurative expression because in natural things where there is giving there is receiving for if once men be turned from sin to God Pardon comes by virtue of God's Promise and Right to the Inheritance cometh on them And we may figuratively say Adam received his condemnation by eating And so we read in Scripture of receiving condemnation but there was in propriety no act of receiving it If I make a promise upon such a condition as soon as the condition is performed Right to him results without any act of receiving it Right comes upon the Felon that reads Right to have his Life spared Justification Pardon to Life comes upon him by the Law by reading without any act of receiving it Many tell us of applying Christ's Righteousness to Justification and this is all It is an obscure speech and it is you see by this impossible there should be any such thing properly I will tell you what I guess they mean by the word apply viz. Meditating upon any Truth you believe And they mean the same by acting faith viz. Meditating upon Truth we believe This is a great duty to meditate on his Death to act Faith upon his Satisfaction and the fulness of it to draw our hearts to consent and chear our hearts after consent But if once they understand it is Meditation they mean they will not surely pretend it is the only Condition of Justification You may say indeed That Faith receiveth Christ But then you must not mean by Faith Assurance or Reliance for Why doth not Love or Fear or Hope as much receive as reliance But you must mean the moral receiving performed by the natural act of consent acceptance As one receives morally such a man to be his Master that desires his service by consenting and if you will say Faith is Consent why is not Consent to be ruled by him giving up our selves to be ruled by him as much a receiving Christ as Consent to be saved and pardoned by Him And then if you will but grant this this is to grant all I am pleading for For Consent to have him for Lord and Saviour is to consent to be Christians indeed to consent to perform the whole duty of man which is as comprehensive a word as can be spoken to be made the condition of salvation and justification and if consenting to the whole duty of man to the best of our power and knowledg be the condition of begun-Justification and Salvation then you will readily see that continuing this Consent continuing to be Christians indeed and to perform the whole duty of Man to the best of our knowledg and power in the integrity of our hearts and wherein we fail to lament it is the condition of our continued justification and right to salvation If a King grants a Pardon to Rebels on condition they will become Loyal Subjects Consent is enough at the first to attain right to all the benefits of it But continued Consent and continual loyal carriage in the main towards him is the condition of their continued right to Impunity and every moment of continued Loyalry is in order of nature before their continued Right So whereas before we consented to the Gospel-terms our Pardon and Justification and Right to Heaven were only offered to us upon condition and were not actually existent at all now when we have heartily consented they are really existent and actual not meerly conditional so that should we dye in that moment we should be saved whereas had we dyed before we should have perished But yet the continuance of our Justification and pardon of future sins is still conditional 5. It is a gross mistake that many take up with thinking it would be a more gracious liberal and free speech and promise to say Only believe rely accept Christ for Saviour and you shall have right to Heaven and be justified and I will require nothing else of you for right to Heaven This believing shall only be influential into your right but yet except you repent turn from sin to God and obey you shall have no right shall not be justified than to say Turn from sin to God repent believe obey and you shall have right to salvation For such a speech as the first instead of being a more noble free promise is non-sense is untruth and a contradiction in the very words It is to say and unsay it is to say All shall be equally influential into right all shall be Conditions and yet they shall not all be Conditions and equally influential into right For a Condition is that which if we do not we shall have no right to the thing promised This is a Condition as much as any Condition and as influential into right as any condition in the world that is not the whole condition for every condition is only a sine qu● non and altogether only sine quibus non cum quibus And therefore for any to speak thus is weakly to lye for God pretending to keep up the honour of God's free grace ignorantly thinking that if God require us to repent return or no mercy then it is not free then we merit our pardon it is not of grace contrary to all Reason and Scripture God hath made the Condition required from us as little as small a matter as he thought would stand with his Honour Wisdom and Government in the World and they that would make the conditions of Grace Mercy and Salvation through Christ less than God hath made them what ever good intention they have to honour God by it do really dishonour him as an unholy God for God thought it would not stand with the honour of his Holiness to accept unto favour and life any but they that should return from sin unto God Ministers are to tell the whole terms that men may sit down and consider the cost and if men will be offended and say it is a hard saying and like not Christ and Life on these terms Let them be offended they have their choice to let him alone but they shall know they had life and death set before them on gracious easie terms and they have rewarded their own souls evil for good Again if a necessity of Repentance and sincere Obedience to Justification would hinder it from being free then such as say thus and tell us these things are only for possession do virtually grant that possession of Salvation is not free But what Christian-ears can endure this that Possession is not equally free with Right that both are not of free-grace 6. They that say There is only one act to be done by us for Pardon Justification and Right to