voluntarie but originall sinne is not voluntarie therfore c. An 1. We may not leape from one science See Chap. 13 quest 2 obiect 6. to an other which is done in this argument whiles in defining what is sinne the Aduersarie goes from Divinitie to Philosophie to fetch the definition thereof from Aristotle 2 And so here is a confusion of distinct principles and seuerall artes and a fallacie of manie questions as but of one 3 Originall sinne though it be not voluntarie in vs now in respect of the present corruption which wee draw by nature from our Parents yet it was and is voluntarie in respect of the beginning principle and cause therof Adam and all his posteritie in his loynes coÌ„mitted the first sinne of disobedience against God willingly and thence issued Originall corruption And this is sufficient even in reaâ—on and philosophie to make an action sinâ—ull For a drunken man though hee knowe â—ot what hee dooth yet if hee kill a man in â—is drunkennesse is by the Ciuill Lawes of men guiltie of murder because himselfe was the cause of his drunkennesse See more in the place of Renouation Cap 13 quest 2. QVESTION 3. Of the workes of infidels The Question is whether the good workes or vertues of infidells be so devoide of all fault that the doers thereof do deserue grace The Papists affirme they bee wee denie it for these reasons Without Faith it is vnpossible note that hee sayth it is vnpossible to please God Hebr 11 6 but infidells want faith otherwise they should not bee called infidells therefore c. Without Christ there is no saluation noâ— eternall life no favour or acceptance with God Iohn 17 2 3. Acts 4 12. Matthew 3 17. But Infidells are ignorant of Christ therâ—fore c. The end of the workes which Infidellâ— doe is not for the glorie of God but most vsually for their owne glory or couetousnes or ambition or pleasure c. 4 If the person that doth the workes be not accepted of God then neither can the workes be how glorious soeuer they bee So God had no respect to the sacrifice of Cain not because for that the sacrifice was not of it selfe good but because God hated Cain for his impietie See more heereof in the 12 Cap quest 1â— Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 Vertuous actions in infidels are not of themselues Simil Wine that is of it selfe very good if it bee kept in a corrupt vessell becommeth so distastful that it may breed loathing or cause vomiting in them that drinke of it euill therefore they may not bee reckoned amongst sinnes An. What vertues are of themselues wee are not heere to dispute but howe they are to bee esteemed by reason of the faultinesse of them in whome they are 2 It is therefore a fallacie making moe questions where there should be but one for these two are confusedly shuffled together what vertues are in theÌ„selues what in respect of the maÌ„ in whom they be It is also a fallacie from that which is spoken in some particular respect to the same taken absolutely and simply for these actions are in the former place taken absolutely and in the later as they are considered in respect of him that doth them 2 Vertues in infidels are the gifts of God therfore they are not to be accounted for sinnes Ans 1. As they are the gifts of God so they are no sinnes but heere they are considered not as they proceede from god but as the good and holy gifts of God are polluted in corrupt instrumeÌ„ts 2. Ther are some gifts of god which sanctifie the receiver and some which doe not of these later sort are all the gifts of God in infidells 3. A good thing by abusing of it may become to be not good 3. God hath sometimes rewarded the vertues of infidels therefore they haue pleased him and haue not beene counted for sinnes Ans God hath commanded outward honestie and civility and doth bestowe temporall rewards on it but our question is not of temporall but of spirituall rewards therefore this is nothing to the purpose The Iesuites in the Article of Iustification doe expound the word Grace for a gift or habite infused into the soule of man from heauen vvherby he is moved or stirred to worke righteously and by the which his workes are accepted with God and this Grace they deuide into the first and seconde Grace or into a preventing Grace whereby a man may prepare himselfe to the grace of Iustification and a subsequent grace whereby a man is actually and habitually made iust and so they goe about to shift of by this their explication al the sayings of the scripture concerning the free instification by faith But we in the Article of Iustification acknowledge no signification of the word Grace but such as excludeth all merits of men and that for these reasons Because the word Grace in the article of iustification is opposed to Merits workes and debt 1 To him that worketh the wages is not accounted by fauour but by debt Rom 4. 4. 2 If it be of grace it is no more of workes or else grace were no more grace Rom 11. 6 3 Hee hath saued vs not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace which was giuen to vs through Christ Iesus before the world was 2 Tim 1 9 4 By grace ye are saued through faith that not of your selues it is the gift of God not of workes c. Ephes 2 8 9 Because it is opposed to the law which causeth wrath we are not vnder the law but vnder grace Rom 6 14 Because the Scripture declareth the same by equivalent termes or words of the same value and signification 1 They are iustified freely by his grace Rom 3 4. 2 When the bountifulnes and loue of god our sauiour toward man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which wee had done but according to his mercy he saued vs Tit 3 4 5 3 Let vs goe boldly to the throne of grace that we may receiue mercy Heb 4 15. Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe dispute 1 The word grace is oftentimes in the Scripture taken for the gifts of the holy Ghost as 1 Corin â—â— 4 there are Diuisiones Gratiarum diuersities of graces Ans 1 The propositions of this reason are meere particulars and therefore no conclusion followes 2. Whereas Saint Paul in that place treateth of miraculous gifts not of iustification and our question is only of iustification the argument is frivolous and not to the present purpose 3. Though wee denie not but that the worde grace is sometimes in Scripture taken figuratiuely for the free gifts of God bestowed vpon men for only we deny it to bee vsed in that signification in the article of Iustification any where in the Scripture yet neither in this place alledged is the word Charis vsed which properly signifieth grace but Charisma which signifieth a gift freely bestowed
power receaued from God 3 The word heere vsed translated by the Latine Interpreter potuisti signifieth to be able to do any thing somtime to be of strength or to be strong in doing any thing the meaning of the prophet is the they kept no measure but with all their strength and power committed sinne 9 The just man might offend and hath not offended and do evill and hath not done it Eccl. 31. 10. Therefore c. Ans 1 There is more in the conclusion than in the premises For all that follows is this that the righteous man might reframe from transgressing but it doth not hence follow that he could doe it of himselfe 2. The Author speaketh of an outward matter name ly the outward vse of money Therefore it is nothing to the purpose 3 If it be meant of spirituall matters never so much yet the argument followes not from a righteous and regenerate man whose will is freed by the Holy-Ghost to a man vnregenerate 10 I will sacrifice freely vnto thee c Ps 54 6. Answere 1 Againe this argument proceedes from a regenerate man to an vnregenerate 2 and that this willingnesse and voluntarie service was not in David of himselfe it is plaine because he could not of himselfe acknowledge his sinn of adulterie and manslaughter vntill he was admonished therof by the Prophet 11 Cornelius could of his owne accord prepare himselfe to the grace of God and dispose himselfe to the acknowledgement of saluation Act 10. 4 c. Ans Cornelius was before amongst the lewes instructed out of the Scriptures concerning the Messias so that onely hee did doubt of the person of the Messias therefore it is sayd of him that hee was a deuoute man and one that feared God c. and prayed God continually Verse 2 therefore this argument proceedes from a regenerate man to an vnregenerate For Cornelius did alreadie believe the sayings of the Prophets concerning the Messias but did not yet know that those things were fulfilled in Iesus Christ of Nazareth 12. Euerie Man that hath hope in God pargeth himselfe 1 Iohn 3. 3. Answere 1 Hee speakes of the regenerate which have hope and trust in God by faith 2 Neither dooth hee speake of their conuersion but of their renouation or sanctification which followes conuersion and hath his growth and increasing in the regenerate vntill the end of their lives This argument therefore hangeth not together but hath foure termes 13. If anie man open the dore vnto me I will come in vnto him c. Revela 3. 20. Therefore a man may aforehand dispose himselfe vnto grace by his free-will Ans There is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent For this onely is sayde what the Sonne of GOD will doo to him which openeth the dore vnto him but there is never a worde sayde by what power the heart of man is opened whether by his owne or such as he hath received frō an other 14 Hee that standeth firme in his heart that hee hath no neede but hath power over his owne will c. 1 Corinthians 7 37. Ans Hee speakes of things meerely externall of marrying or not marrying Therfore this is impertinent 15 Euerie man as he hath determined in his heart c 2 Corinth 9 7. Ans 1 The speech is of the regenerate 2. And of externall matters that is of giving of Almes There are therefore fiue termes 16 Yet not I to wit haue wrought but the Grace of God as the Papists expound it hath wrought with mee 1 Corinth 15 10. Therfore our strength doth worke in our conversion and not God alone Ans 1 Paul speakes not of his conuersion but of the labour of his Ministerie by which GOD did worke 2. The text speakes of Paul being regenerated 3 Paul disables himselfe in respect of all things even those that concerne his ministerie and ascribes them to God alone in the wordes going before where hee sayth By the grace of God I AMTHAT I AM and his grace which is in me was not in vaine c. yet not I but the grace of God which is with me Heere is therfore made a great confusion of the tearmes or words 1 with mee that is I and God by ioynt working 2 with mee that is in mee 3. the regenerate 4 the vnregenerat 5 conuersion 6. Ministerie 17 We are Gods Cooperarii fellow-workers 1 Corinth 3. 9. Ans 1 He speakes of his ministerie not of his conuesiron 2 And if it could be racked to his renued state yet were it then an argument from the regenerate to the vnregenerate 3 The Latine and Greeke phrase is ambiguous and may either signifie that we are fellow workers with God or we fellow workers amongst our selues are the workemen of God This later is the plaine meaning of the place and therefore to avoyde ambiguitie it is rightly translated we together are Gods labourers 18. If man be so enthralled vnto sinne that hee cannot conuert of himselfe he cannot iustly bee accused of sinne vnles God will accuse nature Ans 1 God doth accuse nature not simply as it is in it selfe but in some respect as it is corrupted 2 The first man before hee fell had the power of his free-will which hee should haue preserued Man therefore is neverthelesse iustly accused of his corruption There remaine yet besides this first now ended three other questions moe in this matter of free will which wee must needes discusse 1 of Originall sinne 2. of the works of infidells 3 of Grace QVESTION 1. Of Originall sinne The Iesuites at this day doe denie that Originall sinne in vs is truly and indeede sinne which they doe least they should be constrained to acknowledge the great and horrible corruption of the power of mans nature Wee on the contrarie side do affirme that Originall corruption is a sin that no little or light one but a verie great one and that for these reasons Because the holy Scripture giveth plainly the name of sinne vnto it 1. Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sinn hath my mother conceived me Psalme 51 5. 2. Thou hast set our iniquities before thee and our secret sinnes that is originall sinn in the light of thy countenance Psalm 90 8 3 I knew not sinne but by the Lawe for I had not knowne luste except the law had sayd c. Rom 7 7. 4. Now if I doo that I would not it is no more I that doe it but the sinne that dwelleth in me Rom 7 20. Because seeing it is the fountaine well-spring of all actuall sinnes Originall sinne by reason of which all the rest are sinns shall much more be such it selfe Because Originall sinn or concupiscence rebelleth against the Lawe of GOD and is not subject thereto Romans 7 23. and 8. 7. But sinne is the transgression of the Lawe 1 Iohn 3 4. See more hereof in the 13 Chap of Concupiscence Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason thus 1 Sinne is not sinne vnlesse it bee
and therefore the place is fitly and properly translated There are diuersities of gifts 2 Wee haue receiued grace for grace Iohn 1 16. 1 This is a Doctour like exposition made of their meere Doctour like authoritie without reason wee haue receiued grace that is the grace of iustification for grace that is for the first preuenting grace but the meaning of Saint Iohn is because the sonne of God was in highest grace and fauour with his heauenly father therfore the father doth embrace vs also with his grace and louing kindnesse for his sonnes sake in whom we beleeue 2. That grace in this place is opposed vnto merites the wordes next following doe declare for the law was giuen by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Heere Christ and Moses are opposed betwixt themselues as it were in the proper differences of their offices that is of wrath by the lawe and of grace by the Gospell 3 Grace is the gift of God Ephes 2. 8. therefore it is an infused and inherent habite Answere 1 It is a fallacie of composition and diuision arising from the construction of the words for the word gift is not simplie and alone construed with the word grace but with saluation by grace which if it might should haue been expressed in one word Brieffely plainely the Apostle saith not Grace is the gift of God but that ye are saued by grace that is the gift of God 2 and for the same cause the gift in this place is not a habite for gift is opposed there to workes and merites as being a thing that is bestowed of meere fauour 4 It is a good thing that the hart be established with grace Heb 13 9 Answere 1 It is a begging of the question because this is controuersed whether Grace doe in these wordes signifie an infused habite 2. In that very place the Apostle opposeth Grace to the vaine confidence of workes against them who put confidence in meates drinkes c. Therefore by the nature of contraries it appeareth that the worde grace is heere taken for the free fauour and mercy of God so the argument hangeth not together for in the Antecedent Grace is taken for the fauour of God in the consequent for an infused habite CHAP. 10. Of Iustification SEeing our aduersaries doe diuerse wayes wrâ—p and inuolue this disputation let vs devide it into certaine and distinct members and questions Question 1. And first of all whereas the word Iustification wrested to a wrong signification by our aduersaries as if to iustifie were of an vniust man to make one iust habitually or by a habite infused and seeing they hisse at imputed righteousnesse let vs consider the true signification of the word which is no other but to be absolved from the guilte of sinne that it bee not imputed but pardoned which appeareth to bee so by the reasons following Because the word Iustification is a borowed word from the court and place of iudgement which in his proper and naturall signification is vsed in the Scripture for to absolue acquitte from fault and guilte as 1 Wo to them that iustifie the wicked for a reward Isai 5 23. 2 The righteous shal bee iustified and the wicked condemned Deuter 25 1 3 Euerie man that hath a matter might come vnto me that I might iustifie him as the originall hath and is translated agreeable to the sense more plainely that I might doe him iustice 2 Sam. 15 4. 4 He that iustifieth the wicked and hee that condemneth the iust euen they both are abomination Note that the whole acte of Iustification is very liuely described in the scripture as a kind of iudiciall acte processe the person guilty is called to the barre is accused witnesses are brought he is condemned or acquitted c. to the Lord Prov. 17 15. So doth the same word keepe the same signification borowed from the court and iudicial proceedings in the Article of Iustification in the Scripture 1 Who shall laie any thing to the charge of Gods chosen It is God that Iustifieth who shall condemne c. Rom 8 33 34 heere yee see words and phrases borowed froÌ„ the court and Iudiciall proceedings to accuse to condemne to iustifie c. The equivalent termes of iustification or other words vsed to signifie iustification doth proue the same 1 Reconciliation is taken for Iustification Rom 5 9 10 2 Corinth 5 19 2 Remission of sinnes is taken for Iustification 1 Blessed is he whose wickednesse is forgiuen Psal 32 1 2 Iesus shall saue his people from their sinnes Matt. 1 21. 3 To giue knowledge of saluation vnto his people by the remission of their sinnes Luke 1 77 3 To cover sinnes is vsed for Iustification Blessed is he whose sinne is couered Psal 32 1 4 The holy Scripture doth describe Iustification by the words imputation reckoning accounting c as 1 God was in Christ and reconciled the world vnto himselfe not imputing their sinnes vnto them 2 Corinth 5 19. 2 Blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord imputeth not iniquitie Psal 32 2 3 As Dauid declareth the blessednesse of the man vnto whome God imputeth righteousnes without workes Rom 4 6 4 Abraham belieued God and it was counted to him for righteousnes Rom 4 â— 5 To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom 4 5. 6 It is not written for him onely that it was imputed to him for righteousnes but also for vs to whom it shall be imputed for righteousnes which beleeue in him c. Rom. 4. 23 24 Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason 1 To iustifie by force of grammaticall composition of the word is all one as to make a man iust of one who before was not iust therefore to iustifie is to make iust Ans 1 Heere be foure termes in the Antecedent the signification of the word iustificatioÌ„ is taken grammatically in the consequent it is taken according to that signification which belongeth properly to Diuinitie 2. The true signification of the word is to be sought for in the proper science wherin the question is contained 2 By his knowledge shall my righteous seruant iustifie many Esai 53. 11 therefore hee doth iustifie them by an infused habite Ans It is a fallacie called ignoratio elenchi for the necessarie determination or limitation is omitted which followeth in the next words for he shal beare their iniquities which wordes declare that iustification is to bee vnderstoode heere by imputation for they are iustified by his bearing their sinnes as if themselues had borne and wyped away their owne sinnes 3 Holinesse shall preserue and iustifie the heart that is shall cause that the heart bee made iuste Ecclesiastic 1. 17. Answere 1 The booke is not Canonicall and therefore in a point of such moment his authoritie is not sufficient â— in the Greeke text the word iustification is not found 3 Neither if to iustifie in this place
hath beene sufficiently declared in the article of Iustification and the sayings of Scripture Acts 4 12. 1 Ioh 1 7. 2 1 2. doe witnesse 2 Errour They appoint a certaine measure to contritiâ— on and do teach that vnlesse it be sufficient there is no remission of sinnes granted We reiect this doctrine of sufficient contrition Because it breedeth a perpetuall doubting of the remission of sinnes the repentant sinner being alwaies in suspense and neuer knowing whether he be so contrite and sorrowfull as the measure of his sins do require therfore will alwaies be in doubt and anxiety whether his sinns be forgiuen Neither can his Confessor free him from this doubt For how shall he know certainly that the penitent mans contrition is sufficient for the greatnes and multitude of his sinnes And so at length he should thrust his penitent into the depth of desperation because he sendeth him to his owne sufficient contrition and not to the all-sufficient satisfaction of Christ By this doctrine of sufficient contrition the soule of maÌ„ is led to a thing simply impossible For how is contrition for all sins possible seeing the knowledge of all and euery sin in particular not only contrition for them is impossible and vnknowen vnto vs 1 Who can vnderstand his faults clense me from my secret faults Psal 19 12. 2 Thou hast set our secret sins in the light of thy countenance Psal 90 8. 3 Error They require satisfaction in their repentance or penance not the satisfaction of Christ but their owne which the priest receiuing confession must lay vpon him that confesseth that heereby satisfaction may be made to God by the sinner for his sinne Which same also cannot stand with the one alone satisfaction of Iesus Christ nor with the article of free iustification nor with the imperfeâ—tion of our good works Add heereto that those workes of satisfaction are for the most part works of their owne deuising which for that very respect are hatefull to God Which seeing they haue beene sufficiently handled before in their proper place it is not needefull now to repeate the same Let it suffice onely to note and reckon vp their errours The explication thereof the Readershall finde before in their due place 4 Errour In reckoning the parts of repentance they omit faith and take awaie as it were the soule or life of true Repentance For Contrition without faith is desperation as wee are taught by the most woefull examples of Cain and Iâ—das Iscarioâ— Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinn Rom 14 23. Therefore Repentance without faith cannot please God that sinnes may beforginen Repentance without faith profited Esau nothing Heb 12 17. 5 Errour Mens Consciences also with our Aduersaries are most miserably tormented while they driue them that confesse to a particular rehearâ—ing of all and euery of their sinnes and that with euery circumstance of the facte fondly affiâ—ming that this same particular confession is meritorious by reason of the shame that is ioyned with it which vexing of mens consciences in the Church of God is not to be borne with for these reasons â— Because it hath no precept nor example of Christ or his Apostles Such auricular confession as they call it hath no promise of grace in the Word of God The Gospell is turned into the law whiles the desert of remission of sinnes is placed in the reckoning vp of offences as it were out of the tables of the law The Conscience is brought into perpeâ—uall doubting and at length into desperation on while a man feareth lest he haue forgotten some of his sinnes or lest he haue not rehearsed his sinnes with all circumstances necessarie to the remission of his sinnes And therfore he must alwaies doubt of the remission of his sins which how terrible a tormeÌ„t of Conscience it is men of conscience may easily iudge Hence it came to passe that superstitious men in Popery coulde scarse euer make anie end of confessing and yet still there arose new prickes of conscience Agaiâ—â— mens workes which cannot stand in Gods iudgment are placed in the roome of Christs satisfaction and the free forgiuenesse of sinns whileâ— such confession is made meritorious The doubtfull consâ—ience is driâ—en to an impossibility as before was cited out of Psal 19 12. 90. 8. Contrariwise our Aduersaries do dispute 1 In the Primitiue Church publike confession of â—innes by circumstances was required Answere 1 It was a part of ecâ—lesiasticall discipline which was woont to be performed before the whole Church by such persons as had grieuously fallen before the Church had any Christian Magistrates But that popish auricular confession was vnknowen to all antiquity There are therefore foure termes 2 God exercised priuate confession in Adam when he sayd Adam where art thou in Cain when hee asked where is Abel thy brother Gen 3 9 4 9. Answ 1. Those places prooue nothing lesse For Neither did Adam nor Cain reckon vp their sinnes but endeuour to cloke them But to preaâ—h to the impenitent the acknowledging of their sinnes to receiue confession in the care are things very far different 2. Neither did either Adam or Cain deserue anie thing by that confession which was with much a doe wrunge from them For Caine despaired and Adam belieuing on the promised seede of the woman was saued by faith not by the confession of his sinne The Argument then hangeth not together 3 Hee that hideth his sinnes shall not prosper but hee that confesseth and forsaketh them shall haue mercy Prou. 28 13. When I held my tongue my bones coÌ„sumed Psal 32 3. If we acknowledge our sinnes c. 1. Ioh. 1 9. therefore Auricular confession is grounded on the Scripture Ans 1. Seeing there is not one onely manner of confession but diuers they argue from that which is spoken indefinitely to the same taken definitely from a particular as from an vniversall for there is a confession before God there is a generall confession there is a particular before the Ministers before the Church before our brethren whom we haue offended c. All these things our Aduersaries do fondly confound together 4. The Iewes were baptized of Iohn and confessed their sinnes therefore he speaketh of Auricular confession Math. 3 6 Answer 1 There is more in the conclusion than in the Premisses for it followeth not they confessed themselues to be sinners therfore they confessed every one of their sinnes on the Popish manner 2 The text saith that Ierusalem all Iurie all the region about Iordan went out vnto Iohn c. of how much time then and how many tenne yeares had Iohn neede of if hee would haue heard the particular and secret enumeration of all and every their sinnes nothing therefore followeth 5. Christ saith Whosesoever sinnes yee remit they are remitted vnto them and whosesoevers sinnes yee retaine they are retained Ioh. 20 23. That it may therefore bee knowne what sinnes ought to be retained what not