Lord Jesus Christ Fourthly That man solâ Fide onely by Faith is accounted righteous before God Although we understand nothing else by the word solâ but what the Apostle saith 4. Of Justification onely by Faith that he is justified by meer grace through Faith onely for Christs sake without the works of the Law and as some ancient Fathers interpreted it Yet we desire not to impose and inforce that word as necessary upon any man in regard that by many it may be abused and mistaken as if we could be justified and saved by such a Faith which is onely without any good works If that likewise the Papists did not inforce upon us their own expressions and doctrines concerning the merits and satisfaction of works which are yet lesse warrantable by Scripture But as long as they stick fast to this Tenet and opinion of theirs that we are justified also before God by merits of our good works They cannot finde fault with us if we do reply to them by way of retortion that the justification is done by Faith alone and not by merits 5. The true meaning and declaration of Christs words in the Holy Communion Fifthly The declaration and meaning of Christs Word that he called the Bread his Body because it did signifie and represent his Body or because it is a signe of his Body Although we for our part acknowledge this exposition to be agreeable both to the words and very end of the Institution and to all the Articles of Faith and that some ancient Fathers Tertullian Augustine Theodoret and others have expounded it thus As the Papists and Lutherans themselves do not deny the blessed Bread and Wine to be signes and seals of the Body and Blood of Christ given and shed for us Yet we desire not to inforce and presse upon any man such interpretation as necessary unto salvation or as the Word of God it self Whereas many of ours vide inprimis Wolfang Musculum in 26 Matth. pag. 552 554 555. confesse openly that this exposition though it be not erroneous in it self yet is not sufficient unlesse it did shew and expresse withall the sort and nature of those signes viz. not bare naked significative and representative signes nor bare historical symbols and tokens of remembrance but signa exhibitiva exhibiting and certifying pledges and assurances whereby the things signified by them namely the Body of Christ which hath been given for us the Blood of Christ that is shed for us are really and verily by vertue of his promise though not for the nourishing of our bodies but to the cherishing and quickning of our souls delivered and appropriated unto us and likewise really and verily received by us though not corporally and carnally by our mouth but spiritually by faith As the Papists and Lutherans themselves do not deny such spiritual partaking as hath been said before but acknowledge it to be the onely saving Communion Wherefore we for our part teach thereby no new Doctrine as necessary unto Salvation but onely teach that very same they themselves must allow and approve of If but they reciprocally do not inforce upon us their own particular Interpretations as hath been mentioned oftentimes already nor judge and condemn us therefore but give us liberty to adhere to the Words and Declaration of Christ and the Apostle Paul But as long as they intend to obtrude unto us their pretended carnal supernatural eating for a necessary Article of Faith we cannot but contradict it by a more solide exposition and illation grounded upon the Word of God Sixthly Concerning the Doctrine of Gods absolute purpose and decree of election and reprobation we acknowledge and receive it thus far as our adversaries commonly construe our meaning thereof not onely for no necessary Doctrine of Faith but also not for the proper Doctrine and Opinion of our Churches Being that such a term is not expressed in any general Confessions but onely used by some Divines which yet others do rather absolutely forbear because of the misapplication and abuses with all sorts of calumnies that may arise from them And although we finde many disceptations and different Interpretations concerning the eternal Predestination and Reprobation not onely betwixt our Divines but also betwixt the Romish-School Authors amongst themselves and no lesse between the said Lutherans Yet we cannot receive either theirs or our particular opinions for necessary Doctrines which are professed of all Christians without the manifest Word of God and unanimous consent of the Primitive Church not onely because very few men are capable to comprehend the depth and profunditie of those Points but also because it is sufficient for us unto salvation to know onely of the Elect and Predestinated as much as the Apostle expresly teacheth Ephes 1. vers 4 5 6. That God hath chosen us in Christ before the foundation of the World that we should be holy and without blame before him in love having predestinated us unto the Adoption of children by Jesus Christ unto himself according to the good pleasure of his Will To the praise of the glory of his grace wherein he made us accepted in the beloved Ephes 2. vers 8 9 10. 2 Tim. 1. vers 9. For by grace are ye saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of works lest any man should boast For we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them Contrarywise concerning the Reprobates it sufficeth us to know onely that what Christ himself saith He that beleeveth not is condemned already because he hath not beleeved in the Name of the onely begotten Son of God John 3. vers 18. So that the fault and defect can no wayes be imputed to God who himself taketh no delight in the death and destruction of a sinner but will that he may repent and live not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance Exod. 18. vers 23 32. and 33. vers 11. 2 Petr. 6. vers 9. But the fault and defect lieth absolutely and totally in themselves who loved darknesse rather then light and therefore receive not the love of the Truth that they might be saved John 3. vers 19. So that we are elected not out of any consideration and respect in our selves but out of meer grace in Christ Jesus both unto salvation and the means ordained thereunto through sanctification of the Spirit and beleef of the Truth whereunto he called us through the Gospel 2 Thessal 2. v. 13 14. But the Reprobates are cast away by Gods just judgement because of their sins unbeleef and impenitency unto the just punishment and condemnation of sins according to the Word of the Lord O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self but in me is thy help Hos 13. v. 9. Moreover all other Disputes and Controversies of the predestinate and reprobates which may be moved and debated on as Why God to one
of Monks and Nunnes but in stead thereof we teach that the revenues of Monasteries ought rather to be converted to the use of miserable poor wretches that are not able to work or employed for the maintenance of Churches and Schools That we give liberty for Marriage both to Ecclesiasticks and Laicks nor use the Confirmation and Extreme unction or the holy Orders for making Ministers in such a manner as it usually is amongst them That we permit no Temporal Jurisdiction or Dominion to our Spiritual Pastors nor will have them submit to a Supreme and Universal Pope neither exempt them from the jurisdiction and judicature of civil Magistrates and such like observations and assertions of their exteriour Worship Will they therefore I say judge and condemn us as hereticks it is fit then to prove first by certain and undeniable Arguments and Warrants and such which we may understand and satisfie our consciences withal that the said Points are necessary to the saving Faith and Obedience of Christ Except they would yeeld and confesse that they do condemn us for unnecessary things But now the Papists themselves will hardly affirm the aforesaid Points the Images the Invocation of the Saints the Indulgences c. to be directly and in themselves necessary unto salvation They commend and extol onely their singular good use and benefit but do not enjoyn their necessity Or in case they would in one or other point as in the Auricular confession Adoration of the consecrated Hostia c. intrude a necessity yet they cannot make it appear so upon any pretence nor ground But we may have evident proofs from the Word of God to the contrary that they are not necessary because they were not used by the Apostles and Primitive Christians Likewise in Points of Controversies and articles of Faith and Doctrine That we have the affiance and assurance to be justified and saved before God not through our own merits and satisfaction but onely through meer mercy and grace by a true and lively faith in the onely perfect Sacrifice of propitiation and merits of our Lord Jesus Christ That also in the whole work of our conversion and salvation we ascribe nothing at all to our own natural strength of free-will but all to the meer grace and assistance of God without which we are able to do nothing that is good how can they then condemn us as hereticks for it whereas they must at length confesse themselves Bellarm. lib. 5. de Justificat cap. 7. Propos 2 3. this to be the safest and surest way not to confide and trust in our own strength works merits but onely in Gods meer grace and mercy and the precious merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ If this be the surest way we must certainly and necessarily conclude that our Doctrine in this point is not heretical nor damnable and their Doctrine of own merits and strength not necessary unto salvation but rather that our Doctrine is the surest and safest whereby all honour and praise is denied to man and attributed to God alone and their Doctrine dangerous and pernicious ascribing all honour to man and denying it to God Moreover that we cannot be induced to believe the transformation of the bread or Transubstantiation as they call it in the Supper of the Lord or a true Sacrifice though without blood of the transubstantiated Body and Blood of Christ both for the quick and the dead or the Purgatory They cannot condemn us for unlesse they do convince us first that such Doctrines are necessary unto salvation so that Christs Sacrifice upon the Crosse and the Spiritual eating thereof profiteth us nothing and the Blood of Christ cannot cleanse us from sins except we believe also the Sacrifice of Masse and the Purgatory which neverthelesse I hope they will not assert or never be able to prove since they partly confesse themselves that they could not have been assured in those and such like points onely by the words of our Lord Jesus unlesse the declaration and determination of the Church had given to them satisfaction therein And this is their main Objection Whether such Points of Doctrine though not necessary in themselves are yet necessary for all Christians by reason of the determination of the Church That the afore-mentioned and such like Controversies of their Doctrine and Religion though they be not directly and in themselves necessary unto salvation yet are necessary even for this reason Because they have been thus taught and ordained by the Catholike Church which ought to be believed and obeyed in all things But here we ask first the question What they mean by the Catholike Church If they understand the Universal Christian Church which since the Apostles hath been at all times and in all places dispersed as the word Catholike doth imply it then we confesse as we have already declared it heretofore that whatsoever it teacheth with one accord as necessary unto salvation to be undoubtedly necessary But they themselves will not assert this of most of the aforesaid Points and though they should assert it of some yet can they not prove it neither from the Word of God nor by the true and undoubted Writings of the Ancient Fathers Whereas by this very same ground we can rather make appear the contrary that the most and principal points thereof must be either false and erroneous or at least unnecessary because they have not been taught thus in the Primitive Church Neither hath the Primitive Church ever presumed and taken upon it self such a power as if it might or should teach or ordain some new Doctrine unto salvation and so impose on the Christians a heavier yoke and prescribe them a narrower way to salvation then it hath received from Christ and the Apostles Whereby also consequently is made void whatsoever they object concerning the Vnwritten Word of God being not able to produce any certain ground or warrant that it was received by the Primitive Church Although otherwise we do not absolutely reject the Traditions of the Church which either are grounded upon the Scripture or are counted onely as Useful Ordinances of the Church and not as necessary unto salvation Constat omnem doctrinam quae cum illis Ecclesiis Apostolicis matricibus originalibus fidei conspiret veritati deputandam id sine dubio tenentem quod Ecclesia ab Apostolis Apostoli à Christo Christus à Deo suscepit reliquam verò omnem doctrinam de mendacio praejudicandam Tertull. de Praescr c. 21. Ex ipso ordine manifestatur id esse Dominicum verum quod sit prius traditum id autem extraneum falsum quod posterius immissum Id. 32. Viderint qui Stoicum Platonicum Dialecticum Christianismum protulerunt nobis curiositate non est opus post Jesum Christum nec inquisitione post Evangelium Cùm credimus nihil desideramus ultra credere Hoc enim prius credimus non esse quod ultra
words if we do examine the Coherence by the precedent and subsequent Verses the Apostle collecteth for us Two most necessary Rules 1. What and why we ought not to judge one another especially in matters of Religion and Conscience 2. What and how far we may and are bound in conscience to judge Whereof as I have heretofore given a publike Exposition to the Christian Assembly I intend at this present upon the request of some Well-wishers to Truth and Unanimity to impart to them a more ample Treatise with an Application to the Modern Differences not affecting Contention but Peace and Unitie As the Apostle himself doth sufficiently intimate and imply that this is the most exact Rule for Peace and Edification when he addeth Vers 19 Let us follow after the things which make for Peace and things wherewithal one may edifie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another Chap. 2. The Father of all Mercie who is also a God of Judgement and Peace grant to me and all that shall peruse this present Treatise to set before our eyes his Judgements and Mercie that we his children in all our Judging may exercise Mercie Love and Peace to the end that in the Great day of Judgement we may not be judged by him according to the severitie of his Justice but according to his Grace and Mercie CHAP. II. Wherein we ought not to judge one another in matters of Religion IN the beginning of the Fourteenth Chapter to the Romanes the Apostle admonisheth them Him that is weak in the faith receive you but not to doubtful disputations The Greek Text hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Vulgar Version Non disceptationes cogitationum Beza Non ad altercationes disceptationum that is not to a debate of disputes or as some expound it more properly with Augustine Not to judging of thoughts that is to say Do not set your selves as judges over his thoughts to reject him because of his weaknesse of faith Which afterwards he applieth chiefly to those who though they had received the Gospel of Christ and believed to obtain salvation by his grace yet did observe the distinction of days and meats or made a scruple whether they might eat such meat without sin and offence which God himself had forbidden in the Law Though some will have understood thereby the meats offered to Idols concerning which 1 Cor. 8 he teacheth almost the very same Doctrine Where the Apostle exhorteth those that were strong in faith who had sufficient knowledge that such distinctions of meats and days in the Law were now not any more requisite according the Gospel in Christ but were a meer indifferent thing that they neverthelesse should not contemn or condemn such as were weak in faith who had not yet the knowledge of their liberty or were doubtful of it nor should judge their thoughts why they did abstain from such meats but receive them in love and charitie Moreover he giveth to them both this Rule Vers 3. Let him that eateth understand every thing by reason of the libertie of the Gospel not despise him that eateth not and let not him that eateth not every thing by reason that he thinketh the difference of meats according to the Law to be necessary or doubteth thereof judge him that eateth For God hath received him in the Gospel Who art thou that judgest another mans servant To his own master he standeth or falleth Which he repeateth over again in the Tenth verse But why doest thou judge thy brother that eateth every thing or why doest thou set at nought thy brother that eateth not We shall all stand before the Judgement-seat of Christ where every one of us shall give account of himself to God Whereupon these words follow Let us not therefore judge one another any more viz. in such a manner whereby we should reject one another and not receive one another in things that are not necessary and indifferent and notwithstanding are accounted to be necessary by some out of their weaknesse of faith Out of which words and discourse of the Apostle we frame this general Rule and Doctrine That in those things A General Rule wherein we ought not to Judge one another which in themselves are not necessary for salvation though by some they are counted to be necessary none shall judge or condemn the other but one ought to tolerate and receive the other in love and charity as brethren that are weak in faith And this Rule is of great force and validity as well in matters that we ought to believe as practise For both were called into question by the Primitive Christians in the Apostles times Some believed that it was requisite to make a distinction of meats and therefore did not eat every thing Others believed and counted it unnecessary and therefore did eat every thing promiscuously Both did also herein rely upon the Word of God Those upon the bare and simple letter of the Law These upon the liberty of the Gospel according to which they did declare the true meaning of the Law which they had received from Christ and the Apostles And although those did greatly erre in the letter of the Law which was not intended for the times of the Kingdom of Christ among the Gentiles but had its reference onely to the Old Testament Yet the Apostle will that none shall judge despise or reject the other neither in their faith nor works but receive him as a weak brother in faith Whereunto this Observation ought to be annexed That the Apostle doth speak onely of those who out of meer weaknesse and fear to transgresse the Law made it a matter of necessity or at least a scruple of it to whom it would have been sin if they had eaten of the forbidden meat against their own though erroneous consciences according to the doctrine of the Apostle Verse 23. He that doubteth is damned if he eat viz. against his own conscience because be eateth not of faith for whatsoever is not of faith is sin But those that rather out of malice and obstinacie then out of meer weaknesse and fear did make it necessary after such a manner that they not onely for themselves believed and did it but also enforced it upon the believers among the Gentiles as necessary to their own and other mens salvation without any true ground from Gods Word and consequently besides the distinction of meats and days did presse upon them the necessity of the whole Ceremonial Law Circumcision Sacrifices c. and therefore condemned and reviled the Apostle Paul and others as enemies to the Law who did faithfully maintain and defend the liberty of the Gospel Those I say the Apostle by the vertue of his Apostleship hath very earnestly judged reproved and condemned yea stigmatized and branded with an Anathema especially in his Epistle to the Galatians Chap. 1. vers 8 9. If any man though an Angel from heaven preach any other Gospel unto you then that ye have received
as they do the Second Commandment concerning Images will they judge us therefore Should we not have the liberty to teach and to learn the Commandments of God as God himself hath spoken them from heaven and with his own finger graved them in the Two Tables of stone Whereas we tolerate the Omission of the Commandment of Images in them that hold it not absolutely necessary for Children and Ignorants though we cannot approve thereof nor excuse it especially seeing what great Idolatry it hath bred in Popery and that the said Commandment doth extend as well to the Children and Idiots as to the Priests and Levites yea we conceive it to be most necessary for those being naturally bent to Images and Idolatry Also in the differences in Doctrine of Faith that in the holy Communion by eating Sacramentally the blessed bread and wine we believe onely a Spiritual partaking or communion and presence of the Body and Blood of Christ and not a carnal and corporal Neither believe Vbiquity or Omnipresence of Christs Body but the Omnipresent power vertue and raigning of Christ true God and Man even in those places where his Body is not present Nor an Vniversal reconciliation and propitiation by Christs death whereby indifferently all men whether they do believe or not believe repent or not repent have remission of their sins already But whereby principally Repentance and Faith is required from all in general and withal forgivenesse of sins and life in Christ is faithfully offered and promised and consequently really and effectually conferred and given to those onely who effectually believe and repent Nor also an Vniversal Election of all men unto Salvation but onely of the Believers and yet so that they are not elected by and according to their faith or works which God hath foreseen in them before the election much lesse that they should be saved without faith or without good works But so that they are elected out of a meer special grace in Christ even to this end that they through faith might be converted from the bondage of sins to be adopted unto children of God and to good works and made fit for to walk therein and obtain everlasting Salvation Will they for these or other such like points of Controversie in Doctrine for the most part arising from thence judge and condemn us as Hereticks as most of them use to do then they must first prove that their opinions and manner of expressions in those points which they so fiercely insist upon and whereon commonly all the controversie dependeth are not onely agreeable to Truth but also absolutely necessary unto Salvation But we shall sooner prove those not to be warrantable by Scripture then they shall make them good to be necessary seeing we cannot finde any wherein the Word of God the truth much lesse the necessity thereof For what is then that is necessary unto salvation We agree already both in this against the Papists namely that whatsoever is necessary unto salvation is plainly and expresly taught in the holy Scripture but whatsoever are onely bare words of men and Humane Traditions and Doctrines ought and must not be necessary unto salvation though otherwise they are not repugnant to truth Wherefore they must first prove that such opinions and manner of expressions of theirs which they esteem to be necessary are expresly taught in the Scripture and yet so that we also may certainly and undoubtedly conceive them to be grounded thereon as a necessary point of saving Faith and obedience to Christ They will say That they have proved it already sufficiently and abundantly if not by words of the Scripture it self at least by equivalent words and by a necessary consequence drawn out of them And that we therefore onely will not receive and condescend unto it because it is contrary and repugnant to our natural reason As for Example When the Lord speaketh of the Bread Take eat this is my Body they make it to be equivalent as if he had said Eat my Body in and with the bread and that he meant a natural corporal and carnal eating Likewise when the Lord said I am with you till to the end of the world they infer that his Body also is present with us because Jesus Christ or his Godhead is nowhere without his Body or separated from it But although this may seem to them in their Reason to be a clear and plain Exposition or a necessary Consequence yet we examining and comparing not onely our Reason but also the words of Christ himself and not the Five words by themselves alone but all the words of the whole Institution together yea of the whole Scripture we finde the Contrary a great deal clearer and plainer that the words of Christ are not agreeable to their Interpretation nor their Consequence of any validity much lesse of necessity For indeed this is plain and manifest that Christ saying to his disciples Take eat spoke of the bread which he took brake and gave to them and that he meant there a corporal carnal visible and natural eating of the bread And it is also manifest and evident that he spoke of that bread This which I have broken and given This bread which ye take and eat This is my Body which shall be given for you But that this is to be understood after a carnal and corporal manner so that his body who sate with them at Table and reached to them the bread hath been Invisibly in and under the bread and eaten though supernaturally with their carnal mouth is no ways clear and manifest But they themselves and the Papists also notwithstanding they adhere and insist both upon the literal sense yet they cannot agree among themselves in their pretended literal meaning and besides they both must confesse that they are words of peculiar Mysteries which ought to be Mystically and Sacramentally understood Wherefore it is yet more clear and manifest since Spiritual things must be compared with Spiritual 1 Cor. 2.13 that these words also after the na ure and propriety of other Sacraments must have a Spiritual meaning as the Lord himself saith of the eating of his Body and the drinking of his Blood The words that I speak unto you they are Spirit and they are Life Joh. 6 63. As both Papists and Lutherans must acknowledge that in the Lords Supper is principally required a Spiritual eating We have also many pregnant motives which are not onely grounded upon Natural Reason but upon the words of the Institution it self upon the undoubted Articles of the Christian Faith and upon many other manifest places of the Scripture and therefore binde not onely our Vnderstanding but our Consciences that we cannot receive by any means their Interpretation concerning the Invisible body in the bread and the carnal eating thereof which may be common both to the unbelieving and ungodly Hypocrites and also to the believing because it doth more evidently appear to be repugnant to these words of God
grounded upon the Word of God or at least that it should not be necessary unto salvation for us who do not acknowledge and receive it But when he will absolutely have his word parallel with Gods Word even in those points which we cannot but judge to be evidently repugnant to the Word of God and so in stead of Christ will be a Lord over our souls and consciences and of the Universal Christian Church on earth Certainly those can no ways be blamed who not onely give him no credit therein at all but by reason of that proclame him to be the Antichrist Now since we may not grant this power to the Popes at Rome although they had entangled by their perswasion and kept in subjection during many hundred yeers in the Western Church so many Emperours and Kings yea all Doctours Bishops and Prelates how much lesse may we impart it to any other Pastor and Teacher of Gods Church of what name soever And he that should ascribe perhaps to Luther or Calvin Jerome Austin Abuses of mens particular opinions and interpretations amongst the Evangelical c. or to any particular Convocations as to the Authors Formulae Concordiae Sax. as also to whole and National Synods that their own particular Interpretations Consequences Iâ—lations Manner of expressions were as certain and infallible or as necessary unto Salvation as the word of God it self what is it else but to make of Luther of Calvin and the rest so many Popes of such Convocations and Assemblies so many Popish Councels yea to prefer in some manner mens words and opinions before the holy Scripture as if they in some points had expressed themselves better and with more perspicuity and circumspection For my part I confesse that Dr Luther and Calvin have in the principal and most Points though not in all well truely and profitably expounded the Scripture because they have compared and declared for the most part Scripture by Scripture I acknowledge also that the Doctrine of the Confession and Apologie of Augspourg with other Confessions of the Reformed Churches Also the Doctrine of the Synod at Derdrecht is true and agreeable in it self to Scripture in those Articles that have been handled and concluded therein though withal I doubt not but some other Teachers of our Churches have yet expressed themselves better and more perspicuously in some one or other point of the holy Scripture But that we should hold their declarations and particular opinions and expressions as indubitable and necessary unto salvation as the Word of God it self and presently judge and condemn those for Hereticks who do not fully receive them They themselves as much as I know have never yet required it But those who under the name of Lutherans addict themselves to the profession of the Formulae Concordiae Saxonicae when they not onely binde and tie their Ministers to it by a solemn Oath but also us who do not receive in points of Controversies their expositions expressions and inferences contained therein for thorowly agreeable to Scripture what is that then but to judge and condemn us as Hereticks From whence must necessarily follow that their expressions and opinions ought to be as certain and undoubted and as necessary unto salvation as the Word of God it self which indeed would be a plain New Popery They use to accuse us Who are those that make the natural reason to be the foundation and rule of their Faith that we make our Natural Reason the foundation and rule of our Faith Whereas we principally insist thereupon that we ought not to ground any Article of Faith upon humane Reason but meerly upon the plain manifest and undoubted Word of God We make use of our Reason having been enlightned and brought unto the knowledge of Christ as of a requisite means whereby to learn to understand the holy Scripture for without Reason it cannot be understood How far the Reason may be used in matters of Faith That we also ought to infer out of the Scripture whatsoever by a necessary consequence dependeth from it and is agreeable to it as much as we by Gods grace are able to comprehend it or to refute and to reject whatsoever is repugnant to it And that we ought reverently to apply the holy Scripture unto Doctrine Consolation and Admonition yet so that we do not oblige and binde any man in his conscience further to those Interpretations and Inferences we in our understanding derive out of the Scripture then himself together with us is able to understand them to be warrantable by it and the Word of God doth binde thereunto But those who cry up their own Interpretations Inferences and Expressions not onely for True Doctrines but even for Necessary Articles of Faith insomuch that they judge and condemn as Hereticks all others that do not acknowledge them to be agreeable to Scripture They are those who make their Own reason and understanding to be the foundation and rule of their Faith and yet not onely of their own but of other mens Faith and of the Universal Christian Church They are those who make themselves new Popes and Infallible Judges in matters of Religion and Conscience Which honour we cannot give to any man living on earth but to God alone and his undeniable Word contained in the Books of the Old and New Testament as also all the Protestant Churches in whole Europe have Unanimously always against Popery referred themselves thereunto Neverthelesse we do not reject all consequences and interpretations How far we may make use of Consequences and Interpretations in matters of Faith nor all mens expressions though they are not verbally and literally set down in the Scripture as also we do not disapprove the Translation of the Scripture into other Languages We rather confesse that many Inferences and Interpretations may be very good profitable sound and necessary in themselves and that we may many times of necessity use them for the confutation of several Errours But we cannot ascribe further to any mans Interpretations and Consequences an Vniversal necessitie unto salvation for all Christians then we have declared already namely when they are so clear and manifest that they may be understood and received for certain and undeniable of all Christians or of those for whom they shall be necessary especially when they have been acknowledged and taught undoubtedly and with one accord in the true Primitive Church and therefore may be called true Catholike expositions Now those that do not acknowledge our Expositions to be such How far those that dissent are to be tolerated we may not therefore on our part judge and condemn them as Hereticks but we must receive and tolerate them as weak in faith according to the Doctrine of the Apostle Neverthelesse upon this condition that they reciprocally do not enforce upon us and others as necessary their own Interpretations and Inferences to the contrary nor we being willing to forbear and tolerate their
Bread and the Wine in the Supper of the Lord to be bare signes and Seales whereby the Body and Blood of Christ is but Signified and not really given That we defend Absolutum decretum that God freely without any respect of Faith or Unbelief good or evill works of men hath decreed in his eternall Councell to elect and choose some unto Salvation others the greatest part to cast away and reject as Reprobates unto damnation Also That we understand by Christs going down into Hell the hellish paines and torments Christs Soul suffered Lastly that we hold the Pope at Rome to be the great Antichrist Which Articles of Doctrine are neither plainly expressed in the Scripture nor by the Ancient Doctors of the Church The true Doctrine of the Reformed Churches 1. Of Free-will We Answer First that we do not deny the free will in man in that sence and meaning as some and all the Ancient Fathers have taught out of the Scripture For we confesse 1. That the Naturall man hath a Free-will in many Naturall and Temporall Free indifferent matters 2. In Celestiall Spirituall things to many Outward sins either to commit or to avoid them 3. Yea also to many Outward good works 4. That the Regenerate man hath a true Free-will or which is made Free by the grace of God to true Spirituall works which are acceptable to God Yet so that not onely the beginning but also the continuall help and assistance of Gods grace is required unto it 5. This onely we deny That the Naturall unregenerated man hath naturally without the preventing gracious help and operation of the holy Ghost any Freewill to true Spirituall inward works which are acceptable to God as to Saving Faith Charity Hope and consequently to the true Spirituall outward works which arise from those inward Which also the holy Scripture hath unanimously taught against Pelagius That the Naturall man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishnesse unto him neither can be know them 1 Corinthians 2. verse 14. And that we are not sufficient of our selves to think any thing as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God 2 Corinthians 3. verse 5. For it is God which worketh in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Philipp 2. Verse 13. He that hath begun a good worke in us will also performe it Philippians 1. Verse 6. Without him we can do nothing John 15. Verse 5. For we are by nature the Children of wrath dead in sins Ephesians 2. Verse 5. And he that obeyeth sin is the Servant of Sin Romans 6. Verse 16.20 2 Peter 2. Verse 19. But if the Sonne maketh us free wee shall be free indeed John 8. verse 34.36 And faithfull is he that calleth you who also will doe it 1 Thessalonians 5. verse 24. But if there be besides any other controversie of mans Free-will or Gods gracious help we hold neither theirs nor our particular opinions to be necessary unto Salvation especially for all Christians who oftentimes understand but little or nothing at all of such subtil questions and therefore ought not to judge nor condemne one another Like as amongst the Papists themselves the modern Dominicans and Jesuites cannot agree about these questions nothwithstanding the prohibition made by the Pope not to accuse and condemne one another for errours in Faith 2. Of merits of good works 2. Nor do we deny the merits of good works in that sence as the ancient Fathers use the word Meritum desert or Mereri to deserve viz. That we obtaine thereby temporall and eternall remuneration by grace for Christs sake in vertue of his promise Which we confesse unanimously with them by warrants of the Scripture But we deny onely Meritum de condigno as the Papist School-authors and Divines principally the Jesuites do teach that such in themselves are condigne meritorious works of eternall life so that God is bound to give everlasting life not onely by reason of his truth and mercy for Christs sake but also of right and debt though he had not ingaged himself thereunto by any promise Which condigne meritorious works were never taught either by the Scripture or by the ancient Fathers but are rejected of many Schoole-authors and Divines yea by many moderne Roman Catholicks themselves As the famous Jesuite Vasques confesseth that many Catholickes dissent from us calling us Hereticks but in words but most agree with us in the matter it selfe and condiscend of necessity unto our opinion And the Jesuits themselves are not as yet agreed wherein properly the Efficacy and worthinesse of such Condigne merits of works consisteth Vide Bellarm. de Justific lib. 5. c. 17. Suarez in 3. Thom. Tom. 1. quest 19. art 3. disp 39. Vasq. in lib. 2a. quest 114. disp 214. c. 2. 4. 3. Concerning the Sacrifice of the Masse 3. Of the Masse it is sufficiently evident and manifest that there is nothing plainly and expressly taught and declared thereof either in the Institution of the Lords Supper or in the whole volume of the Scripture And although some or all the Ancient Fathers had taught it yet it could not be received for an Article necessary unto Salvation because they had not taught it out of the word of God and because Faith love and obedience of Christs Commandments and Institution may very well subsist without the Masse But it is certaine that even the Ancient Doctors of the Church never have taught such Sacrifice of the Masse as now a dayes in Popery is professed and held for the Soveraigne Worship and chiefest part of Religion For although they called the Administration of the Lords Supper Missam and that from thence because the Catechumeni those that were not yet Baptized were usually dismissed from it with these words Ite Missa est And although they have attributed the name of Sacrifice to the Holy Communion it selfe yet they did it not in such a sence and meaning that the Priest should offer againe the real and essentiall body of Christ in his hand and mouth and also performe a new Propitiatory Sacrifice both for the quick and dead and for other necessities as for sicke Cattell for good weather as it is taught and expressed in the Councell of Trent Sess 22. c. 2. v. 9. Canon 1.3 But that it is Sacrificium Eucharisticum a Sacrifice of Thanksgiving partly because the faithfull gathered and collected the Bread and Wine upon the Lords Table for the Holy Communion and necessitiy of the poor from whence the Germans retain still the name of Oblateâ— partly because the Holy Communion it selfe is a Commemoration and Representation of the perfect Oblation and Sacrifice of Christ finished upon the Crosse as the principall Roman â—chool authors and Divines themselves do expound it by calling it Sacrificium commemorativum representativum So that we also may say as much not of their Masse but of the Holy Communion as it hath been Instituted by our
therefore tumultuously rise when they maintaine and use the like libertie for themselves and them that are of the same confession and Faith Being the Lutheran Divines and confessours have hitherto not as yet attributed to themselves the power and as I hope will never do it to absolve and discharge the Subjects from their Oath of Allegiance towards the Magistrats who have renounced the Obedience of the Popish See and Supremacy as is sufficiently evident by the examples in France and England Besides it would be thought in it selfe an unheard of injustice if Subjects should not suffer their Magistrats to have as much liberty of conscience and Religion as they themselves enjoy under their protection Neverthelesse if the Christian Magistrats might but so much obtaine of the Lutheran Divines and Congregations of their Jurisdiction that they might not calumniate or condemne the Doctrine of our Church but receive us also as fellow-brethren and Christians in our Faith and Confession unto the Ministery of the Word of God and use of the Holy Sacraments in their Assemblies I willingly then confesse that men should not rashly undertake such a particular Reformation in Ceremonies whereby a Division may be occasioned but rather tolerate such defects because of the Ignorant and weake in Faith who do little apprehend and discerne the Discrepancy of the Doctrine and at the alteration of Ceremonies presently imagine a quite new Religion whereas they should insist upon the found information of Doctrine till they at length without offence and division either might be corrected with an unanimous goodly consent or each one enjoy his owne libertie therein To which purpose it conduceth also what Augustine saith of such like alterations Ep. 118. Ipsa mutatio consuetudinis etiam quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat That many times the alteration doth not profit and edifie as much as the Division doth hurt and destroy CHAP. XII Whether or how far we may judge or condemn the persons in matters of Religion BY all this what hitherto hath been declared of judging the matter it self in different and controverted Doctrine and Religion and of Separation and Reformation which ariseth from it We may easily now understand whether and how far we ought to judge the persons For as far as we must discern the matter what is sound and true or false and erroneous Doctrine or Worship So far we can and must also extend our judgement to the persons according to the Word of God which of them teacheth true or false Doctrine to the end that we may know whom and how far we ought to follow lest they become not to us or others a stumbling block or an occasion to fall seeing that that judging of the Doctrine cannot be performed without this judging of the persons who maintain the Doctrine yet so that we ought not instantly to condemn the erring persons because of their errour though it be damnable in it self but rather alwayes hope for their amendment as much as is possible As First Those that maintain ignorantly such an errour which by a necessary consequence is repugnant to the saving fundamental Doctrine and yet stand steadfastly to the fundamental Doctrine it self and build not their salvation even upon such an errour and therefore do not condemn us and our Churches which maintain the very same ground Those I say no doubt notwithstanding their errour they may be saved if they do but labour to testifie also their Faith in Christ by the works of Christian charity and godly conversation And that such an errour which would be damnable unto us that have the knowledge of it if we should receive it against conscience yet is not damnable to them by the grace of God who will judge them according to their Faith and works and not according to their ignorance Secondly Those also which condemn us yet if they do it not out of malice as those false Apostles Gal. 1. and 3. and 4. but out of humane weaknesse and meer ignorance either because they are not truely informed of our Doctrine and Faith or esteem it to be repugnant to the Word of God and the Doctrine of the Primitive Apostolical Church Those I say we ought not to condemn although they condemn us with indiscretion but rather pray for them and hope the best of their salvation as long as they hold fast the ground of Faith and the love of Christ which we presume not without reason the greatest part of them do Thirdly Those likewise who ground and build their salvation upon erroneous and false Doctrine and Religion which in some manner all those are enforced to do who account them for necessary fundamental Doctrine and indeed sufficiently testifie that they do not condemn us meerly out of infirmity but out of an uncharitablenesse and malice and also retain not the true ground of Faith nor the love of Christ Those we may judge by the Word of God as all other men who passe their life in notorious sins and vices without true repentance that they are in a damnable condition which is to say That God could condemn them of right in their blindnesse and malice and shall undoubtedly condemn them unlesse they repent Finally we may proceed also with them after the rule of Christ and the Apostles A man that is an Heretick reject let him be unto thee as an Heathen man and a Publicane Matth. 18. v. 17. after the first and second admonition knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himself Yet we ought not therefore utterly to condemn them but rather still pray for them hoping God may convert them yet before their last gasp For although the Apostle saith 1 John 5. vers 16. There is a sin unto death for which we shall not pray Yet he saith not that we shall not pray for the sinner much lesse condemn him unto death we being not able exactly to know nor ought to judge whether he hath committed the sin unto death viz. the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost or in other sins is given over to a hardned and an obdurate unbeleef and impenitency With one word We must absolutely resigne and commit the judgement of eternal damnation to God alone being the onely Law-giver who is able to save and to destroy Jam. 4. v. 12. Who art thou that judgest another mans servant to his own Master he standeth or falleth yea he shall be holden up for God is able to make him stand Rom. 14. v. 4. Which we now may easily apply to our often-mentioned twofold Adversaries God forbid that we should condemn all Roman-Catholicks much lesse all Lutherans in general or even one single and particular man For first concerning the Papists Whether and how far the Papists may be saved in their Religion like as a twofold Doctrine and Religion is maintained amongst them viz. partly the true Primitive Catholick Apostolick Doctrine wherein they with us and we with them do agree partly the new Popish
Doctrine and Ceremonies which they have added in the latter hundred yeers without and against Gods Word Also there are two sorts of people amongst them The One who in their Christianity onely and principally cleave to the indubitable universal Apostolick Creed which they with us are baptized unto so that they seek onely 〈◊〉 salvation in Jesus Christ the crucified as their own Mediator and Saviour and testifie such beleef of theirs in the effect by Christian charity and godly conversation who also consequently will not condemn us as Hereticks who are united in spirit with them in such universal saving Faith working through love much lesse persecute us with hostility unlesse it were out of meer ignorance because they have no true information of our Doctrine and Faith How should we then condemn them Much more reason have we to account such Catholicks for true Evangelical and not for Popish Christians because their salvation is grounded not upon their own merits and satisfaction or upon other Popish traditions and Auxiliary concomitant means but onely upon the meer grace of God and the precious Redemption of our Lord Jesus Christ And that there hath been at all times a great number of such people and are still at this present even in the midst of Popery not onely the experience of them that live amongst them but their own Books before and after Luther's times do testifie it As Bernardi Anselmi Gersonis Tauleri Thomae de Kempis Erasmi Cassandri Feri Cardinalis Contareni Hosij Pighij Coloniensium in Anti-didagmate Enchiridio and of a great many more Especially their ancient Manuals concerning Meditations upon death which were commonly used a great while before Luther's times wherein the dying persons from all meritorious works and satisfaction and from all other humane means of salvation are onely directed to the precious merit and intercession of the onely Mediator and Redeemer Jesus Christ Formulae interrogandi infirmos inter Epistolas Anselmi Ars benè moriendi Monachi cujusdam Cisterciensis Hortulus Animae Georg. Cassander in Append. Opusc Joh. Roffensis Hosius in Confess Petricov cap. 73. Sacerdotale Roman Edit Venet. Ann. 1555. fol. 116. Sacra Institutio baptizandi Edit Paris Ann. 1575. fol. 35. Ordo baptizandi cum modo visitandi Edit Venet. Ann. 1575. fol. 34. In which Book the Spanish Inquisitors have ordained in their twofold Indice Expurgatorio Annis 1584. 1612. to deface and omit these Questions and Answers following Sacerdos Credis non propriis meritis sed Passionis Domini nostri Jesu Christi virtute merito ad gloriam pervenire Respondeat infirmus Credo Sacerdos Credit quòd Dominus noster Jesus Christus pro nostra salute mortuus sit quod ex propriis meritis vel alio modo nullus possit salvari nisi in merito passionis ejus Respondeat infirmus Credo By the Omission of which words they testifie against themselves that those amongst them who examined the dying persons upon this beleef wherein the principal fundamental Doctrine of salvation consisteth and died upon it have been verily addicted to our Evangelical Faith and Doctrine of the Church and not to their Popish beleef and doctrine And although such men have also adhered in their ignorance to some erroneous opinions according to the common course of those times out of want of better information yet they cannot be condemned or accounted for non-Evangelical because they fixed their comfort and hope of their salvation not upon such erroneous Doctrines not upon merits and invocation of Saints not upon Masses for the souls of the deceased 〈◊〉 â—pon Indulgences not upon Monastical orders and such other like things but onely upon Gods meer grace and mercy in Christ Jesus the crucified To the Objection that may be made That they neverthelesse went to Masse which we count Idolatrie and consequently must condemn all those as meer Idolaters We answer That such men went to Masse in the simplicity of their heart not even according to the new Masse-doctrine which but in the Councel of Lateran Ann. 1218. and after in the Councel of Trent was canonized but according to the pure ancient and simple beleef of Christs words in the holy Communion wherein even yet the moderate Papists so far must agree with us that it is Sacrificium commemorativum A Commemoration and Remembrance of Christs Sacrifice finished upon the Crosse and a spiritual meat of our souls Wherefore there is no doubt but many religious and pious hearts have at all times understood and eaten it after a spiritual sort who heard little or nothing of the Scholastical disceptations of Transubstantiation and had not yet known the depths of Satan as was said of those in Thyatira Revel 2. v. 24. Or have expresly rejected them and beleeved nothing else concerning the Holy Communion but what next to Augustine and other ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church Bertramus or Ratramus in the times of Carolus Calvus when the disputes of this subject had their first beginning hath declared in his Book De Corpore Sanguine Christi who at all times was accounted for a true Catholick Teacher And though some had beleeved the real and corporal presence and oral manducation of Christs Body in the Masse Yet we should have as little reason to condemn them as the Lutherans if they have but grounded the principal comfort and hope of their salvation not upon the carnal but spiritual eating of Christs Body as being the onely Sacrifice and Propitiation for their sins Likewise though they have much declined in the Ceremonies of the Masse from Christs first Institution and have added thereunto many humane partly superstitious partly idolatrous Ceremonies Yet all those cannot presently be accounted for damnable Idolaters who in those times and places where the Supper of the Lord was not otherwise to be had nor the errour made yet so apparently evident went to the common Masse in their simplicity because of the remnant of Christs Institution therein to the end that they might be made partakers of Christs Body and Blood for the quickning of their souls Like as they used the Holy Baptism for to cleanse and wash them from their sins notwithstanding the superstitious humane Ceremonies that were added thereunto Who also though they kneeled down before the consecrated bread and wine being a Sacramental token of remembrance and exhibitive signe of Christs Body and Blood like as the Lutherans also at the administration of their Communion and the Reformed Protestants in England use to do Yet have not fixed the Adoration and confidence of their hearts on the bread and wine but on Christ himself sitting on the right hand of his Father in Heaven And therefore are much lesse to be esteemed Idolaters then for their kneeling and bowing down before painted 〈◊〉 carved Crucifixes which Christ never ordained for signes of remembâ—◠〈◊〉 instead of adoring Jesus Christ in Heaven Though we must confesse that all such things have been used in Popery at