God is created in righteousness and true holiness Let no man deceive you with vain words for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience Be not ye therefore partakers with them * For ye were sometimes darkness but now are ye light in the Lord walk as children of light * For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth * Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord * And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather reprove them * See then that ye walk circumspectly not as fools but as wise * Redeeming the time because the days are evil * Wherefore be ye not unwise but understanding what the will of the Lord is If ye then be risen with Christ seek those things which are above where Christ fitteth on the right hand of God Set your affection on things above not on things on the earth * For ye are dead and your life is hidden with Christ in God * Mortifie therefore your members which are upon the earth fornication uncleanness inordinate affection evil concupiscence and covetousness which is idolatry * But now you also pâ—t off all these anger wrath malice blasphemy filthy communication out of your mouth * Lie not one to another seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds * And have put on the new man which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men Teaching us that denying ungodliness and worldly lusts we should live soberly righteously and godly in this present world * Looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ * Who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purifie unto himself a peculiar people zealous of good works Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses let us lay aside every weight and the sin which doth so easily beset us and let us run with patience the race that is set before us Looking unto Jesus the Author and Finisher of our faith who for the joy that was set before him endured the Cross despising the shame and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God * Follow peace with all men and holiness without which no man shall see the Lord * Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you and thereby many be defiled Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth that we should be a kind of first fruits of his creatures Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness and receive with meekness the ingraffed word which is able to save your souls * But be ye doers of the word and not hearers only deceiving your own selves Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises that by these you might be partakers of the divine nature having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust And besides this giving all diligence add to your faith vertue and to vertue knowledge * And to knowledge temperance and to temperance patience and to patience godliness * And to godliness brotherly kindness and to brotherly kindness charity * For if these things be in you and abound they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. * But he that lacketh these things is blind and cannot see far off and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind be sober and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ. As obedient children not fashioning your selves according to the former lusts in your ignorance * But as he which hath called you is holy so be ye holy in all manner of conversation * Because it is written Be ye holy for I am holy Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree that we being dead to sins should live unto righteousness by whose stripes ye were healed The indispensable necessity of a good life represented in the following Scriptures WHosoever breaketh one of these least Commandments and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven but whosoever shall do and teach them the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven And why call ye me Lord Lord and do not the things which I say Ye are my friends if ye do whatsoever I command you I beseech you therefore brethren by the mercies of God that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your reasonable service And be not conformed to this world but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind that ye may prove what is that good that acceptable and perfect will of God Who will render to every man according to his deeds To them who by patient continuance in well-doing seek for glory and honour and immortality eternal life * But unto them that are contentious and do not obey the truth but obey unrighteousness indignation and wrath * Tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man that doth evil of the Jew first and also of the Gentile * But glory honour and peace to every man that worketh good to the Jew first and also to the Gentile Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandments of God Therefore my beloved brethren be ye stedfast unmoveable always abounding in the work of the Lord forasmuch as you know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new creature For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but faith which worketh by love For we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them And this I pray that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgment That ye may approve things that are excellent that ye may be sincere and without offence till the day of Christ * Being filled with the fruits of righteousness which are by Jesus Christ unto the glory and praise of God Furthermore then we beseech you brethren and exhort you by the Lord Jesus that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God so ye would abound more and more * For ye know what Commandments we gave by the Lord Jesus * For this is the will of God even your sanctification As you know how we exhorted and comforted and charged every one of you as a Father doth
our infirmities for we know not what we should pray for as we ought but the Spirit it self maketh intercession for us with groanings that cannot be uttered c. From whence the Conclusion that is inferred is in the words of S. Paul that we must pray with the Spirit therefore not with set forms therefore ex tempore Sect. 13. THE Collection is somewhat wild for there is great independency in the several parts and much more is in the Conclusion than was virtually in the premises But such as it is the Authors of it I suppose will own it And therefore we will examine the main design of it and then consider the particular means of its perswasion quoted in the Objection Sect. 14. IT is one of the Priviledges of the Gospel and the benefit of Christs ascension that the Holy Ghost is given unto the Church and is become to us the fountain of gifts and graces But these gifts and graces are improvements and helps of our natural faculties of our art and industry not extraordinary miraculous and immediate infusions of habits and gifts That without Gods spirit we cannot pray aright that our infirmities need his help that we know not what to ask of our selves is most true and if ever any Heretick was more confident of his own naturals or did evermore undervalue Gods grace than the Pelagian did yet he denies not this but what then therefore without study without art without premeditation without learning the Spirit gives the gift of prayer and is it his grace that without any natural or artificial help makes us pray ex tempore no such thing the Objection proves nothing of this Sect. 15. HERE therefore we will joyn issue whether the gifts and helps of the Spirit be immediate infusions of the faculties and powers and perfect abilities Or that he doth assist us only by his aids external and internal in the use of such means which God and nature hath given to man to ennoble his soul better his faculties and to improve his understanding ** That the aids of the Holy Ghost are only assistances to us in the use of natural and artificial means I will undertake to prove and from thence it will evidently follow that labour and hard study and premeditation will soonest purchase the gift of prayer and ascertain us of the assistance of the Spirit and therefore set Forms of Prayer studied and considered of are in a true and proper sence and without Enthusiasm the fruits of the Spirit Sect. 16. FIRST Gods Spirit did assist the Apostles by ways extraordinary and fit for the first institution of Christianity but doth assist us now by the expresses of those first assistances which he gave to them immediately Sect. 17. THUS the Holy Ghost brought to their Memory all things which Jesus spake and did and by that means we come to know all that the Spirit knew to be necessary for us the Holy Ghost being Author of our knowledge by being the fountain of the Revelation and we are therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taught by God because the Spirit of God revealed the Articles of our Religion that they might be known to all ages of the Church and this is testified by S. Paul He gave some Apostles and some Prophets c. for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the Body of Christ till we all come in the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect man c. This was the effect of Christ's ascension when he gave gifts unto men that is when he sent the Spirit the verification of the promise of the Father The effect of this immission of the Holy Ghost was to fill all things and that for ever to build up the Church of God until the day of consummation so that the Holy Ghost abides with the Church for ever by transmitting those revelations which he taught the Apostles to all Christians in succession Now as the Holy Ghost taught the Apostles and by them still teaches us what to believe so it is certain he taught the Apostles how and what to pray and because it is certain that all the rules concerning our duty in prayer and all those graces which we are to pray for are transmitted to us by Derivation from the Apostles whom the Holy Ghost did teach even to that very purpose also that they should teach us it follows evidently that the gift of prayer is a gift of the Holy Ghost and yet to verifie this Proposition we need no other immediate inspiration or extraordinary assistance than that we derive from the Holy Ghost by the conveyance of the Apostolical Sermons and Writings Sect. 18. THE reason is the same in Faith and Prayer and if there were any difference in the acquisition or reception faith certainly needs a more immediate infusion as being of greatest necessity and yet a grace to which we least cooperate it being the first of graces and less of the will in it than any other But yet the Holy Ghost is the Author of our faith and we believe with the Spirit it is S. Pauls expression and yet our belief comes by hearing and reading the holy Scriptures and their interpretations Now reconcile these two together Faith comes by hearing and yet is the gift of the Spirit and it says that the gifts of the Spirit are not extasies and immediate infusions of habits but helps from God to enable us upon the use of the means of his own appointment to believe to speak to understand to prophesie and to pray Sect. 19. BUT whosoever shall look for any other gifts of the Spirit besides the parts of nature helped by industry and Gods blessing upon it and the revelations or the supplies of matter in holy Scripture will be very far to seek having neither reason promise nor experience of his side For why should the spirit of prayer be any other than as the gift and spirit of faith as S. Paul calls it acquired by humane means using divine aids that is by our endeavours in hearing reading catechizing desires to obey and all this blessed and promoted by God this produces faith Nay it is true of us what Christ told his Apostles sine me nihil potestis facere not nihil magnum aut difficile but omninò nihil as S. Austin observes Without me ye can do nothing and yet we were not capable of a Law or of reward or punishment if neither with him nor without him we were able to do any thing And therefore although in the midst of all our co-operation we may say to God in the words of the Prophet Domine omnia opera operatus es in nobis O Lord thou hast wrought all our works in us yet they are opera nostra still God works and we work First is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gods grace is brought to us he helps and gives us abilities and then
they are by way of punishment depriv'd of the glorious face of God must needs have a horrible anguish of soul to eternal ages And this argument besides the reasonableness of the thing hath warrant from the words of S. Austin Si hoc eis non erit malum non ergo amabunt regnum Dei tot innocentes imagines Dei Si autem amabunt tantum amabunt quantum innocentes amare debent regnum ejus à quo ad ipsius imaginem creantur nihilne mali de hâc ipsâ separatione patientu◠Here the good man and eloquent supposes the little babies to be innocent to be images of God to love the Kingdom of God and yet to be sentenc'd to Hell which it may be he did but I do not understand save only that in the Parable we find Dives in Hell to be very charitable to his living brethren But that which I make use of for the present is that infants besides the loss of Gods presence and the beholding his face are apprehensive and afflicted with that evil state of things whither their infelicity not their fault hath carried them 25. II. But suppose this to be but a mere privative state yet it cannot be inflicted upon infants as a punishment of Adams sin and upon the same account it cannot be inflicted upon any one else Not upon infants because they are not capable of a law for themselves therefore much less of a law which was given to another here being a double incapacity of obedience They cannot receive any law and if they could yet of this they never were offer'd any notice till it was too late Now if infants be not capable of this nor chargeable with it then no man is for all are infants first and if it comes not by birth and at first it cannot come at all So that although this privative Hell be less than to say they are tormented in flames besides yet it is as unequal and unjust There is not indeed the same cruelty but there is the same injustice I deny not but all persons naturally are so that they cannot arrive at Heaven but unless some other principle be put into them or some great grace done for them must for ever stand separate from seeing the face of God But this is but accidentally occasion'd by the sin of Adam That left us in our natural state and that state can never come to Heaven in its own strength But this condition of all men by nature is not the punishment of our sin for this would suppose that were it not for this sin superinduc'd otherwise we should go to Heaven Now this is not true for if Adam had not sinned yet without something supernatural some grace and gift we could never go to Heaven Now although the sin of Adam left him in his nakedness and a mere natural man yet presently this was supplied and we were never in it but were improv'd and better'd by the promise and Christ hath died for mankind and in so doing is become our Redeemer and Representative and therefore this sin of Adam cannot call us back from that state of good things into which we are put by the mercies of God in our Lord Jesus and therefore now no infant or idiot or man or woman shall for this alone be condemn'd to an eternal banishment from the sweetest presence of God But this will be evinced more certainly in the following periods For if they stand for ever banished from the presence of God then they shall be for ever shut up in Hell with the Devil and his Angels for the Scripture hath mentioned no portions but of the right and left hand Greg. Naz. and his Scholiast Nicetas did suppose that there should be a middle state between Heaven and Hell for Infants and Heathens and concerning Infants Pope Innocent III. and some Schoolmen have taken it up but S. Austin hath sufficiently confuted it and it is sufficient that there is no ground for it but their own dreams 26. III. But then against those that say the flames of Hell is the portion of Adams heirs and that Infants dying in Original sin are eternally tormented as Judas or Dives or Julian I call to witness all the Oeconomy of the divine goodness and justice and truth The soul that sins it shall die As I live saith the Lord the Son shall not bear the iniquity of the Father that is he shall not be guilty of his crime nor liable to his punishment 27. IV. Is Hell so easie a pain or are the souls of children of so cheap so contemptible a price that God should so easily throw them into Hell Gods goodness which pardons many sins which we could avoid will not so easily throw them into Hell for what they could not avoid Gods goodness is against this 28. V. It is suppos'd that Adam did not finally perish for that sin which himself committed all Antiquity thought so Tatianus only excepted who was a heretick accounted and the father of the Encratites But then what equity is it that any innocents or little children should for either God pardon'd Adam or condemn'd him If he pardon'd him that sinn'd it is not so agreeable to his goodness to exact it of others that did not For if he pardon'd him then either God took off all that to which he was liable or only remov'd it from him to place it somewhere else If he remov'd it from him to his posterity that is it which we complain of as contrary to his justice and his goodness But if God took off all that was due how could God exact it of others it being wholly pardon'd But if God did not pardon him the eternal guilt but took the forfeiture and made him pay the full price of his sin that is all which he did threaten and intend then it is not to be supposed that God should in justice demand more than eternal pains as the price to be paid by one man for one sin So that in all sences this seems unjust 29. VI. To be born was a thing wholly involuntary and unchosen and therefore it could in no sence be chosen that we were born so that is born guilty of Adams sin which we knew not of which was done so many thousand years before we were born which we had never heard of if God had not been pleas'd by a supernatural way to reveal to us which the greatest part of mankind to this day have never heard of at which we were displeas'd as soon as we knew of it which hath caused much trouble to us but never tempted us with any pleasure 30. VII No man can perish for that of which he was not guilty but we could not be involv'd in the guilt unless some way or other our consent had been involv'd For it is no matter who sins or who is innocent if he that is innocent may perish for what another does without his knowledge or leave either
philosoph c. 2. Concupiscere 〈◊〉 concupiscere mentiri non mentiri quaecunque talia in quibus consistunt virtutis vitii opera haec sunt in nostro libero arbitrio B. Macarius Aegyptius hom 15. Caeterúmve semel omninò resonet permanea◠delectus arbitrii libertas quam primitus homini dedit Deus ea propter dispensatione suâ res administrantur corporum solutio sit ut in voluntate hominis situm sit ad bonum vel malum converti Marcus Heremita lib. de Baptismo ultra medium speaks more home to the particular question Haec similia cum sciat scriptura in nostrâ potestate positum esse ut haec agamus nec ne propterea non Satanam neque peccatum Adae sed nos increpat infra Primam conceptionem habemus ex dispensatione quemadmodum ille perinde ac ille pro arbitrio possumus obtemperare vel non obtemperare Julius Firmicus de erroribus profanarum religionum cap. 29. Liberum te Deus fecit in tuâ manu est ut aut vivas aut pereas quia te per abrupta praecipitas S. Ambros. in exposit Psalm 40. Homini dedit eligendi arbitrium quod sequatur ante hominem vita mors si deliqueris non natura in culpa est sed eligentis affectus Gaudentius Brixianus tertio tractat super Exod. Horum concessa semel voluntatis libertas non aufertur ne nihil de eo judicare possit qui liber non fuerit in agendo Boetius libro de consolatione philosophiae Quae cum ita sint manet intemerata mortalibus libertas arbitrii Though it were easie to bring very many more testimonies to this purpose yet I have omitted them because the matter is known to all learned Persons and have chosen these because they testifie that our liberty of choice remains after the fall that if we sin the fault is not in our Nature but in our Persons and Election that still it is in our powers to do good or evil that this is the sentence of the Church that he who denies this is not a Catholick believer 15. And this is so agreeable to nature to experience to the sentence of all wise men to the nature of laws to the effect of reward and punishments that I am perswaded no man would deny it if it were not upon this mistake For many wise and learned men dispute against it because they find it affirmed in H. Scripture every where that grace is necessary that we are servants of sin that we cannot come to God unless we be drawn and very many more excellent things to the same purpose Upon the account of which they conclude that therefore our free will is impaired by Adam's fall since without the grace of God we cannot convert our selves to Godliness and being converted without it we cannot stand and if we stand without it we cannot go on and going on without it we cannot persevere Now though all this be very true yet there is a mistake in the whole Question For when it is affirmed that Adam's sin did not could not impair our liberty but all that freedom of election which was concreated with his reason and is essential to an understanding creature did remain inviolate there is no more said but that after Adam's fall all that which was natural remained and that what Adam could naturally do all that he and we can do afterwards But yet this contradicts not all those excellent discourses which the Church makes of the necessity of Grace of the necessity and effect of which I am more earnestly perswaded and do believe more things than are ordinarily taught in the Schools of Learning But when I say that our will can do all that it ever could I mean all that it could ever do naturally but not all that is to be done supernaturally But then this I add that the things of the Spirit that is all that belongs to spiritual life are not naturally known not naturally discerned but are made known to us by the Spirit and when they are known they are not naturally amiable as being in great degrees and many regards contradictory to natural desires but they are made amiable by the proposition of spiritual rewards and our will is moved by God in wayes not natural and the active and passive are brought together by secret powers and after all this our will being put into a supernatural order does upon these presuppositions choose freely and work in the manner of Nature Our will is after Adam naturally as free as ever it was and in spiritual things it 's free when it is made so by the Spirit for Nature could never do that according to that saying of Celestine Nemo nisi per Christum libero arbitrio benè utitur Omnis sancta cogitatio motus bonae voluntatis ex Deo est A man before he is in Christ hath free-will but cannot use it well He hath motions and operations of will but without God's grace they do not delight in holy things But then in the next place there is another mistake also when it is affirmed in the writings of some Doctors that the will of man is depraved men presently suppose that Depravation is a Natural or Physical effect and means a diminution of powers whereas it signifies nothing but a being in love with or having chosen an evil object and not an impossibility or weakness to do the contrary but only because it will not For the powers of the will cannot be lessened by any act of the same faculty for the act is not contrary to the faculty and therefore can do nothing towards its destruction III. As a consequent of this I infer that there is no natural necessity of sinning that is there is no sinful action to which naturally we are determined but it is our own choice that we sin This depending upon the former stands or falls with it But because God hath super-induced so many Laws and the Devil super-induces temptations upon our weak nature and we are to enter into a supernatural state of things therefore it is that we need the Helps of supernatural grace to enable us to do a supernatural duty in order to a divine end so that the necessity of sinning which we all complain of though it be greater in us than it was in Adam before his fall yet is not absolute in either nor meerly natural but accidental and super-induced and in remedy to it God also hath superinduced and promised his Holy Spirit to them that ask Him SECT IV. Adam's Sin is not imputed to us to our Damnation 16. BUT the main of all is this that this sin of Adam is not imputed unto us to Eternal Damnation For Eternal Death was not threatned to Adam for his sin and therefore could not from him come upon us for that which was none of ours Indeed the Socinians affirm that the death which entered into the
clear ready and a prepared will he dies and disputes not 2. An animal man or a mere moral man that is one under the law one instructed and convinced by the letter but not sanctified by the Spirit he sins willingly because he considers and chuses it but he also sins unwillingly that is his inclinations to vice and his first choices are abated and the pleasures allayed and his peace disturbed and his sleeps broken but for all that he sins on when the next violent temptation comes The contention in him is between Reason and Passion the law of the mind and the law of the members between conscience and sin that weak this prevailing 3. But the Regenerate hath the same contention within him and the temptation is sometimes strong within him yet he overcomes it and seldom fails in any material and considerable instances Because the Spirit is the prevailing ingredient in the new Creature in the constitution of the regenerate and will prevail For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world and this is the victory that overcometh the world even your faith that is by the faith of Jesus Christ by him you shall have victory and redemption and again Resist the Devil and he will flee from you for he that is within you is stronger than he that is in the world and Put on the whole armor of God that ye may stand against the snares of the Devil that ye may resist in the evil day and having done all to stand for All things are possible to him that believes and Through Christ that strengthens me I can do all things and therefore in all these things we are more than conquerors for God is able to do above all that we can ask or think he can keep us from all sin and present us unblameable in the sight of his glory So that to deny the power of the Spirit in breaking the tyranny and subduing the lusts of the flesh besides that it contradicts all these and divers other Scriptures it denies the Omnipotency of God and of the Spirit of his grace making sin to be stronger than it and if grace abound to make sin superabound but to deny the willingness of the Spirit to redeem us from the captivity of sin is to lessen the reputation of his goodness and to destroy the possibility and consequently the necessity of living holily 34. But how happens it then that even the regenerate sins often and the flesh prevails upon the ruine or the declensions of the Spirit I answer It is not because that holy principle which is in the regenerate cannot or will not secure him but because the man is either prepossess'd with the temptation and overcome before he begins to oppose the arms of the Spirit that is because he is surpris'd or incogitant or it may be careless the good man is asleep and then the enemy takes his advantage and sows tares for if he were awake and considering and would make use of the strengths of the Spirit he would not be overcome by sin For there are powers enough that is arguments and endearments helps and sufficient motives to enable us to resist the strongest temptation in the world and this one alone of resurrection to eternal life which is revealed to us by Jesus Christ and ministred in the Gospel is an argument greater than all the promises and inticements of sin if we will attend to its efficacy and consequence But if we throw away our arms and begin a fight in the Spirit and end it in the flesh the ill success of the day is to be imputed to us not to the Spirit of God to whom if we had attended we should certainly have prevailed * The reliques and remains of sin are in the regenerate but that is a sign that sin is overcome and the kingdom of it broken and that is a demonstration that when ever sin does prevail in any single instances it is not for want of power but of using that power for since the Spirit hath prevailed upon the flesh in its strengths and hath crucified it there is no question but it can also prevail upon all its weaknesses 35. For we must be curious to avoid a mistake here The dominion of the Spirit and the remains of the flesh may consist together in the regenerate as some remains of cold with the prevailing heat but the dominion of one and the other are in every degree inconsistent as both cold and heat cannot in any sence be both said to be the prevailing ingredient A man cannot be said to be both free from sin and a slave to sin If he hath prevailed in any degree upon sin then he is not at all a servant of that portion from whence he is set free but if he be a captive of any one sin or regular degree of it he is not Gods freed man for the Spirit prevails upon all as well as upon one and that is not an infinite power that cannot redeem us from all our slavery But to be a slave of sin and at the same time to be a servant of righteousness is not only against the analogy of Scripture and the express signification of so many excellent periods but against common sence it is as if one should say that a man hath more heat than cold in his hand and yet that the cold should prevail upon and be stronger than the heat that is that the weaker should overcome the stronger and the less should be greater than that which is bigger than it 36. But as the choice of vertue is abated and as the temptation grows more violent and urges more vehemently is made less pleasant in the regenerate person so is the choice of vice in the Moral or Animal man The contention abates the pleasure in both their choices but in the one it ends in sin in the other it ends in victory So that there is an unwillingness to sin in all but in the impious and profane person in the far distant stranger But the unwillingness to sin that is in the Animal or Moral man is nothing else but a serving sin like a grumbling servant or like the younger son of the Farmer in the Gospel he said he would not but did it for all his angry words And therefore that the unregenerate man acts the sin against his mind and after a long contention against it does not in all cases lessen it but sometimes increases it Nec leviat crimen eorum magis verò auget quòd eos diù restitisse dixistis said Pope Pelagius To resist long and then to consent hath in it some aggravations of the crime as being a conviction of the mans baseness a violence to reason a breach of former resolutions a recession from fair beginnings and wholly without excuse * But if ever it comes to pass that in the contention of flesh and spirit the regenerate man does sin he does it unwillingly that is
sins are pardon'd by those ways and instruments which God hath constituted in the Church and there are no other external rites appointed by Christ but the Sacraments it follows that as they are worthily communicated or justly denied so the pardon is or is not ministred And therefore when the Church did bind any sinner by the bands of Discipline she did remove him from the mysteries and sometimes enjoyn'd external or internal acts of repentance to testifie and to exercise the grace and so to dispose them to pardon and when the penitents had given such testimonies which the Church demanded then they were absolved that is they were admitted to the mysteries For in the Primitive records of the Church there was no form of absolution judicial nothing but giving them the holy Communion admitting them to the peace of the Church to the society and priviledges of the faithful For this was giving them pardon by vertue of those words of Christ Whose sins ye remit they are remitted that is if ye who are the Stewards of my family shall admit any one to the Kingdom of Christ on Earth they shall be admitted to the participation of Christs Kingdom in Heaven and what ye bind here shall be bound there that is if they be unworthy to partake of Christ here they shall be accounted unworthy to partake of Christ hereafter if they separate from Christs members they also shall be separate from the head and this is the full sence of the power given by Christ to his Church concerning sins and sinners called by S. Paul The word of reconciliation For as for the other later and superinduc'd Ministery of pardon in judicial forms of absolution that is wholly upon other accounts of good use indeed to all them that desire it by reason of their present perswasions and scruples fears and jealousies concerning the event of things For sometimes it happens what one said of old Mens nostra difficillimè sedatur Deus faciliús God is sooner at peace with us than we are at peace with our own minds and because our repentances are always imperfect and he who repents the most excellently and hates his sin with the greatest detestation may possibly by his sence of the foulness of his sin undervalue his repentance and suspect his sorrow and because every thing is too little to deserve pardon he may think it is too little to obtain it and the man may be melancholy and melancholy is fearful and fear is scrupulous and scruples are not to be satisfied at home and not very easily abroad in the midst of these and many other disadvantages it will be necessary that he whose office it is to separate the vile from the precious and to judge of leprosie should be made able to judge of the state of this mans repentance and upon notice of particulars to speak comfort to him or some thing for institution For then if the Minister of holy things shall think fit to pronounce absolution that is to declare that he believes him to be a true penitent and in the state of grace it must needs add much comfort to him and hope of pardon not only upon the confidence of his wisdom and spiritual learning but even from the prayers of the holy man and the solemnity of his ministration To pronounce absolution in this case is to warrant him so far as his case is warrantable That is to speak comfort to him that is in need to give sentence in a case which is laid before him in which the party interested either hath no skill or no confidence or no comfort Now in this case to dispute whether the Priest power be Judicial or Optative or Declarative is so wholly to no purpose that this sentence is no part of any power at all but it is his office to do it and is an effect of wisdom not of power it is like the answering of a question which indeed ought to be askt of him as every man prudently is to inquire in every matter of concernment from him who is skill'd and experienced and profest in the faculty But the Priests proper power of absolving that is of pardoning which is in no case communicable to any man who is not consecrated to the Ministery is a giving the penitent the means of eternal pardon the admitting him to the Sacraments of the Church and the peace and communion of the faithful because that is the only way really to obtain pardon of God there being in ordinary no way to Heaven but by serving God in the way which he hath commanded us by his Son that is in the way of the Church which is his body whereof he is Prince and Head The Priest is the Minister of holy things he does that by his Ministery which God effects by real dispensation and as he gives the Spirit not by authority and proper efflux but by assisting and dispensing those rites and promoting those graces which are certain dispositions to the receiving of him just so he gives pardon not as a King does it nor yet as a Messenger that is not by way of authority and real donation nor yet only by declaration but as a Physician gives health that is he gives the remedy which God appoints and if he does so and if God blesses the medicines the person recovers and God gives the health 52. For it is certain that the holy man who ministers in repentance hath no other proper power of giving pardon than what is now described Because he cannot pardon them who are not truly penitent and if the sinner be God will pardon him whether the Priest does or no and what can be the effect of these things but this that the Priest does only minister to the pardon as he ministers to repentance He tells us upon what conditions God does pardon and judges best when the conditions are performed and sets forward those conditions by his proper ministery and ministers to us the instruments of grace but first takes accounts of our souls and helps us who are otherwise too partial to judge severe and righteous judgment concerning our eternal interest and he judges for us and does exhort or reprove admonish or correct comfort or humble loose or bind So the Minister of God is the Minister of reconciliation that is he is the Minister of the Gospel for that is the Word of Reconciliation which S. Paul affirms to be intrusted to him in every office by which the holy man ministers to the Gospel in every of them he is the Minister of pardon 53. But concerning that which we call Absolution that is a pronouncing the person to be absolved it is certain that the forms of the present use were not used for many ages of the Church In the Greek Church they were never used and for the Latin Church in Thomas Aquinas his time they were so new that he put it into one of his Quaestiones disputatae whether form were more fit the Optative
he did his best and his most innocent endeavours And this I say to secure the persons because no Rule can antecedently secure the Proposition in matters disputable For even in the proportions and explications of this Rule there is infinite variety of disputes And when the dispute is concerning Free will one party denies it because he believes it magnifies the grace of God that it works irresistibly the other affirms it because he believes it engages us upon greater care and piety of our endeavours The one Opinion thinks God reaps the glory of our good actions the other thinks it charges our bad actions upon him So in the Question of Merit one part chuses his assertion because he thinks it incourages us to doe good works the other believes it makes us proud and therefore he rejects it The first believes it increases piety the second believes it increases spiritual presumption and vanity The first thinks it magnifies God's justice the other thinks it derogates from his mercy Now then since neither this nor any ground can secure a man from possibility of mistaking we were infinitely miserable if it would not secure us from punishment so long as we willingly consent not to a crime and doe our best endeavour to avoid an errour Onely by the way let me observe that since there are such great differences of apprehension concerning the consequents of an Article no man is to be charged with the odious consequences of his Opinion Indeed his Doctrine is but the person is not if he understands not such things to be consequent to his Doctrine for if he did and then avows them they are his direct Opinions and he stands as chargeable with them as with his first propositions but if he disavows them he would certainly rather quit his Opinion then avow such errours or impieties which are pretended to be consequent to it because every man knows that can be no truth from whence falshood naturally and immediately does derive and he therefore believes his first Proposition because he believes it innocent of such errours as are charged upon it directly or consequently 7. So that now since no errour neither for its self nor its consequents is to be charged as criminal upon a pious person since no simple errour is a sin nor does condemn us before the throne of God since he is so pitifull to our crimes that he pardons many de toto integro in all makes abatement for the violence of temptation and the surprizal and invasion of our faculties and therefore much less will demand of us an account for our weaknesses and since the strongest understanding cannot pretend to such an immunity and exemption from the condition of men as not to be deceived and confess its weakness it remains we inquire what deportment is to be used towards persons of a differing perswasion when we are I do not say doubtfull of a Proposition but convinced that he that differs from us is in Errour for this was the first intention and the last end of this Discourse SECT XIII Of the Deportment to be used towards persons Disagreeing and the reasons why they are not to be punished with Death c. 1. FOR although every man may be deceived yet some are right and may know it too for every man that may erre does not therefore certainly erre and if he erres because he recedes from his Rule then if he follows it he may doe right and if ever any man upon just grounds did change his Opinion then he was in the right and was sure of it too and although confidence is mistaken for a just perswasion many times yet some men are confident and have reason so to be Now when this happens the question is what deportment they are to use towards persons that disagree from them and by consequence are in errour 2. First then No Christian is to be put to death dismembred or otherwise directly persecuted for his Opinion which does not teach Impiety or Blasphemy If it plainly and apparently brings in a crime and himself does act it or incourage it then the matter of fact is punishable according to its proportion or malignity As if he preaches Treason or Sedition his Opinion is not his excuse because it brings in a crime and a man is never the less Traitour because he believes it lawfull to commit Treason and a man is a Murtherer if he kills his brother unjustly although he thinks he does God good service in it Matters of fact are equally judicable whether the principle of them be from within or from without And if a man could pretend to innocence in being seditious blasphemous or perjur'd by perswading himself it is lawfull there were as great a gate opened to all iniquity as will entertain all the pretences the designs the impostures and disguises of the world And therefore God hath taken order that all Rules concerning matters of fact and good life shall be so clearly explicated that without the crime of the man he cannot be ignorant of all his practicall duty And therefore the Apostles and primitive Doctors made no scruple of condemning such persons for Hereticks that did dogmatize a sin He that teaches others to sin is worse then he that commits the crime whether he be tempted by his own interest or incouraged by the other's Doctrine It was as bad in Basilides to teach it to be lawfull to renounce Faith and Religion and take all manner of Oaths and Covenants in time of persecution as if himself had done so Nay it is as much worse as the mischief is more universal or as a fountain is greater then a drop of water taken from it He that writes Treason in a book or preaches Sedition in a Pulpit and perswades it to the people is the greatest Traitour and Incendiary and his Opinion there is the fountain of a sin and therefore could not be entertained in his understanding upon weakness or inculpable or innocent prejudice he cannot from Scripture or Divine revelation have any pretence to colour that so fairly as to seduce either a wise or an honest man If it rest there and goes no farther it is not cognoscible and so scapes that way but if it be published and comes à stylo ad machaeram as Tertullian's phrase is then it becomes matter of fact in principle and in perswasion and is just so punishable as is the crime that it perswades Such were they of whom Saint Paul complains who brought in damnable doctrines and lusts S. Paul's Vtinam abscindantur is just of them take it in any sense of rigour and severity so it be proportionable to the crime or criminal Doctrine Such were those of whom God spake in Deut. 13. If any Prophet tempts to idolatry saying Let us goe after other Gods he shall be slain But these do not come into this Question but the Proposition is to be understood concerning Questions disputable in materia intellectuali which also
acts of their own promote the hope of their own Salvation which men of reason and choice may by acts of vertue and election it is more agreeable to the goodness of God the honour and excellencey of the Sacrament and the necessity of its institution that it should in Infants supply the want of humane acts and free obedience which the very thing itself seems to say it does because its effect is from God and requires nothing on man's part but that its efficacy be not hindered And then in Infants the disposition is equal and the necessity more they cannot ponere obicem and by the same reason cannot doe other acts which without the Sacraments doe advantages towards our hopes of heaven and therefore have more need to be supplied by an act and an Institution Divine and supernatural 7. And this is not onely necessary in respect of the condition of Infants incapacity to doe acts of grace but also in obedience to Divine precept For Christ made a Law whose Sanction is with an exclusive negative to them that are not baptized Vnless a man be born of water and of the Spirit he shall not enter into the Kingdom of heaven If then Infants have a capacity of being coheirs with Christ in the Kingdom of his Father as Christ affirms they have by saying for of such is the kingdom of heaven then there is a necessity that they should be brought to Baptism there being an absolute exclusion of all persons unbaptized and all persons not spiritual from the kingdom of heaven 8. But indeed it is a destruction of all the hopes and happiness of Infants a denying to them an exemption from the final condition of Beasts and Insectils or else a designing of them to a worse misery to say that God hath not appointed some externall or internall means of bringing them to an eternall happiness Internall they have none for Grace being an improvement and heightning the faculties of nature in order to a heightned and supernatural end Grace hath no influence or efficacy upon their faculties who can doe no natural acts of understanding And if there be no externall means then they are destitute of all hopes and possibilities of Salvation 9. But thanks be to God he hath provided better and told us accordingly for he hath made a promise of the Holy Ghost to Infants as well as to men The Promise is made to you and to your children said S. Peter the Promise of the Father the Promise that he would send the holy Ghost Now if you ask how this Promise shall be conveyed to our children we have an express out of the same Sermon of S. Peter Be baptized and ye shall receive the gift of the holy Ghost So that therefore because the Holy Ghost is promised and Baptism is the means of receiving the Promise therefore Baptism pertains to them to whom the Promise which is the effect of Baptism does appertain And that we may not think this Argument is fallible or of humane collection observe that it is the Argument of the same Apostle in express terms For in the case of Cornelius and his Family he justified his proceeding by this very Medium Shall we deny Baptism to them who have received the gift of the holy Ghost as well as we Which Discourse if it be reduced to form of Argument says this They that are capable of the same Grace are receptive of the same sign But then to make the Syllogism up with an Assumption proper to our present purpose Infants are capable of the same Grace that is of the Holy Ghost for the Promise is made to our children as well as to us and S. Paul says the children of believing parents are holy and therefore have the Holy Ghost who is the Fountain of holiness and sanctification Therefore they are to receive the sign and the seal of it that is the Sacrament of Baptism 10. And indeed since God entred a Covenant with the Jews which did also actually involve their children and gave them a sign to establish the Covenant and its appendant Promise either God does not so much love the Church as he did the Synagogue and the mercies of the Gospel are more restrained then the mercies of the Law God having made a Covenant with the Infants of Israel and none with the children of Christian Parents or if he hath yet we want the comfort of its consignation and unless our children are to be baptized and so intitled to the Promises of the new Covenant as the Jewish babes were by Circumcision this mercy which appertains to Infants is so secret and undeclared and unconsigned that we want much of that mercy and outward testimony which gave them comfort and assurance 11. And in proportion to these Precepts and Revelations was the practice Apostolicall For they to whom Christ gave in Precept to make Disciples all nations baptizing them and knew that nations without children never were and that therefore they were passively concerned in that commission baptized whole Families particularly that of Stephanas and divers others in which it is more then probable there were some Minors if not sucking babes And this practice did descend upon the Church in after-Ages by tradition Apostolicall Of this we have sufficient Testimony from Origen Pro hoc Ecclesia ab Apostolis traditionem accepit etiam parvulis baptismum dare and S. Austin Hoc Ecclesia à majorum fide percepit And generally all Writers as Calvin says affirm the same thing For nullus est Scriptor tam vetustus qui non ejus originem ad Apostolorum seculum pro certo referat From hence the Conclusion is that Infants ought to be baptized that it is simply necessary that they who deny it are Hereticks and such are not to be endured because they deny to Infants hopes and take away the possibility of their Salvation which is revealed to us on no other condition of which they are capable but Baptism For by the insinuation of the Type by the action of Christ by the title Infants have to Heaven by the precept of the Gospel by the energy of the Promise by the reasonableness of the thing by the infinite necessity on the Infant 's part by the practice Apostolicall by their Tradition and the universal practice of the Church by all these God and good people proclaim the lawfulness the conveniency and the necessity of Infants Baptism 12. To all this the Anabaptist gives a soft and gentle Answer that it is a goodly harangue which upon strict examination will come to nothing that it pretends fairly and signifies little that some of these Allegations are false some impertinent and all the rest insufficient 13. For the Argument from Circumcision is invalid upon infinite considerations Figures and Types prove nothing unless a Commandment goe along with them or some express to signifie such to be their purpose For the Deluge of waters and the Ark of Noah were a figure of
added to Baptism be of use either to men or children unless there be a character upon their spirits imprinted when or before they come to the use of reason by the Holy Spirit of God but therefore as the Anabaptists would have our Infants stay from the Sacrament till they can understand the word so also might the imprinting of a character on the flesh of the Jewish Infants have been deferred till the word should be added that is till they could understand the word or declaration of the meaning of that character without which they could not understand its meaning The case is equal In the Jewish Infants the character was before the word in the Christian Infants the word is before the character but neither that nor this alone could doe all the work of the Sacrament but yet it could doe some and when they could be conjoyned the office was compleated But therefore as the Infants under Moses might have that which to them was an insignificant character so may the Infants under Christ have water and a word whose meaning these shall understand as soon as those could understand the meaning of the character So that these pretended differences signifie nothing and if they did yet they are not certainly true but rather certainly false for although the Scriptures mention not any form of words used in the Mosaick Sacraments yet the Jews books record them And then for the other that there is no character imprinted in Baptism it is impossible they should reasonably affirm because it being spiritual is also undiscernible and cometh not by observation And although there is no permanent or inherent quality imprinted by the Spirit in Baptism that we know of and therefore will not affirm but neither can they know it is not and therefore they ought not to deny much less to establish any proposition upon it yet it is certain that although no quality be imprinted before they come to the use of Reason yet a Relation is contracted and then the children have title to the Promises and are reckoned in Christi censu in Christ's account they are members of his body and though they can as yet doe no duty yet God can doe them a favour although they cannot yet perform a condition yet God can make a promise and though the Anabaptists will be so bold as to restrain Infants yet they cannot restrain God and therefore the Sacrament is not to be denied to them For although they can doe nothing yet they can receive something they can by this Sacrament as really be admitted into the Covenant of Faith even before they have the Grace of Faith as the Infants of the Jews could and if they be admitted to this Covenant they are Children of faithfull Abraham and heirs of the promise All the other particulars of their answer to the Argument taken from Circumcision are wholly impertinent for they are intended to prove that Circumcision being a type of Baptism cannot prove that the same circumstances are to be observed all which I grant For Circumcision was no type of Baptism but was a Sacrament of initiation to the Mosaick Covenant and so is Baptism of initiation to the Evangelical Circumcision was a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith and so is Baptism but they are both but Rites and Sacraments and therefore cannot have the relation of type and antitype they are both but external ministeries fitted to the several periods of the Law and the Gospel with this onely difference that Circumcision gave place to was supplied and succeeded to by Baptism And as those persons who could not be circumcised I mean the females yet were baptized as is notorious in the Jews books and story and by that Rite were admitted to the same Promises and Covenant as if they had been circumcised so much more when males and females are onely baptized Baptism must be admitted and allowed to consign all that Covenant of Faith which Circumcision did and therefore to be dispensed to all them who can partake of that Covenat as Infants did then and therefore certainly may now So that in short we do not infer that Infants are to receive this Sacrament because they received that but because the benefit and secret purpose of both is the same in some main regards and if they were capable of the blessing then so they are now and if want of Faith hindered not the Jewish babes from entring into the Covenant of Faith then neither shall it hinder the Christian babes and if they can and do receive the benefit for which the ceremony was appointed as a sign and conduit why they should not be admitted to the ceremony is so very a trifle that it deserves not to become the entertainment of a fancy in the sober time of the day but must go into the portion of dreams and illusions of the night Ad 4. And as ill success will they have with the other Answers For although we intend the next Argument but as a reasonable inducement of the baptizing Infants by way of proportion to the other treatments they received from Christ yet this probability notwithstanding all that is said against it may be a demonstration For if Infants can be brought to Christ by the charitable minsteries of others when they cannot come themselves if Christ did give them his blessing and great expressions of his love to them when they could not by any act of their own dispose themselves to it if the Disciples who then knew nothing of this secret were reproved for hindring them to be brought and upon the occasion of this a precept established for ever that children should be suffered to come to him and though they were brought by others yet it was all one as if they had come themselves and was so called so expounded and if the reason why they should be suffered to come is such a thing as must at least suppose them capable of the greatest blessing there is no peradventure but this will amount to as much as the grace of Baptism will come to For if we regard the outward Ministery that Christ did take them in his arms and lay his hands upon them is as much as if the Apostles should take them in their arms and lay water upon them if we regard the effect of it that Christ blessed them is as much as if his Ministers prayed over them if we regard the capacity of Infants it is such that the Kingdome of Heaven belongs to them that is they also can be admitted to the Covenant of the Gospel for that is the least signification of the Kingdome of Heaven or they shall be partakers of Heaven which is the greatest signification and includes all the intermedial ways thither according to the capacity of the suscipients if we regard the acceptance of the action and entertainment of the person it is as great as Christ any-where expresses if we regard the Precept it cannot be supposed to expire in the persons of
Disciples But he told it to the Jews and yet it does not follow that they should all be baptized with the Holy Ghost and with fire but it is meant onely that that glorious effect should be to them a sign of Christ's eminency above him they should see from him a Baptism greater then that of John And that it must be meant of that miraculous descent of the Holy Spirit in Pentecost and not of any secret gift or private immission appears because the Baptist offered it as a sign and testimony of the prelation and greatness of Christ above him which could not be proved to them by any secret operation which cometh not by observation but by a great and miraculous mission such as was that in Pentecost So that hence to argue that we may as well conclude that Infants must also pass through the fire as through the water is a false conclusion inferred from no premisses because this being onely a Prophecy and inferring no duty could neither concern men or children to any of the purposes of their Argument For Christ never said Vnless ye be baptized with fire and the Spirit ye shall not enter into the Kingdome of heaven but of water and the Spirit he did say it therefore though they must pass through the water yet no smell of fire must pass upon them But there are yet two things by which they offer to escape The one is that in these words Baptism by water is not meant at all but Baptism by the Spirit onely because S. Peter having said that Baptism saves us he addes by way of explication not the washing of the flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God plainly saying that it is not water but the Spirit To this I reply that when water is taken exclusively to the Spirit it is very true that it is not water that cleanses the Soul and the cleansing of the body cannot save us but who-ever urges the necessity of Baptism urges it but as a necessary Sacrament or Instrument to convey or consign the Spirit and this they might with a little observation have learned there being nothing more usual in discourse then to deny the effect to the instrument when it is compared with the principle and yet not intend to deny to it an instrumental efficiency It is not the pen that writes well but the hand and S. Paul said It is not I but the grace of God and yet it was gratia Dei mecum that is the principal and the less principal together So S. Peter It is not water but the Spirit or which may come to one and the same not the washing the filth of the flesh but purifying the conscience that saves us and yet neither one nor the other are absolutely excluded but the effect which is denied to the instrument is attributed to the principal cause But however this does no more concern Infants then men of age for they are not saved by the washing the body but by the answer of a good conscience by the Spirit of holiness and sanctification that is water alone does not doe it unless the Spirit move upon the water But that water also is in the ministery and is not to be excluded from its portion of the work appears by the words of the Apostle The like figure whereunto even Baptism saves us c. that is Baptism even as it is a figure saves us in some sense of other by way of ministery and instrumental efficiency by conjunction and consolidation with the other but the ceremony the figure the Rite and external ministery must be in or else his words will in no sense be true and could be made true by no interpretation because the Spirit may be the thing figured but can never be a figure The other little 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is that these words were spoken before Baptism was ordained and therefore could not concern Baptism much less prove the necessity of baptizing Infants I answer that so are the sayings of the Prophets long before the coming of Christ and yet concerned his coming most certainly Secondly They were not spoken before the institution of Baptism for the Disciples of Christ did baptize more then the Baptist ever in his life-time they were indeed spoken before the commission was of baptizing all nations or taking the Gentiles into the Church but not before Christ made Disciples and his Apostles baptized them among the Jews And it was so known a thing that great Prophets and the Fathers of an Institution did baptize Disciples that our Blessed Saviour upbraided Nicodemus for his ignorance of that particular and his not understanding words spoken in the proportion and imitation of custome so known among them But then that this Argument which presses so much may be attempted in all the parts of it like Souldiers fighting against Curiassiers that try all the joynts of their armour so doe these to this For they object in the same number that the exclusive negative of Nisi quis does not include Infants but onely persons capable for say they this no more infers a necessity of Infants Baptism then the parallel words of Christ Nisi comâ—deritis unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his bloud ye have no life in you infer a necessity to give them the holy Communion c. With this Argument men use to make a great noise in many Questions but in this it will signifie but little First Indeed to one of the Roman Communion it will cause some disorder in this Question both because they think it unlawfull to give the holy Communion to Infants and yet that these words are meant of the holy Communion and if we thought so too I do not doubt but we should communicate them with the same opinion of necessity as did the Primitive Church But to the thing itself I grant that the expression is equal and infers an equal necessity in their respective cases and therefore it is as necessary to eat the flesh of the Son of man and to drink his bloud as to be baptized but then it is to be added that eating and drinking are metaphors and allusions us'd onely upon occasion of Manna which was then spoken of and which occasioned the whole discourse but the thing itself is nothing but that Christ should be received for the life of our Souls as bread and drink is for the life of our bodies Now because there are many ways of receiving Christ there are so many ways of obeying this precept but that some way or other it be obeyed is as necessary as that we be baptized Here onely it is declared to be necessary that Christ be received that we derive our life and our spiritual and eternall being from him now this can concern Infants and does infer an ordinary necessity of their Baptism for in Baptism they are united to Christ and Christ to them in Baptism they receive the beginnings of a new life